Occultism and Post-awakening Natures:

.

.

---

.

Darwin Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Creationism) [Posted initially on 03rd June 2021]: Science misrepresents itself by excluding other notions that don’t match their rigid interpretation, resulting in a transfixed interpretation that hinders the intellectual development of undecided people. The last post raised a question regarding how one acquires memory files [images] or states of consciousness for the quantum world – given we can only describe it but not see it. This invokes faith, but in the scientific world, they call this a ‘theory.’ This is essentially a play on words; the false-to-fact referent is similar to calling ‘Man’ a ‘Person,’ which are similar but distinct.

To them, science theory is the highest-level form of referent because it’s supposedly well-supported and open to refinement. What if their foundation and support are proven wrong? Would they change their mind? Are they open to refinement? The answer is ‘no’ because their support is found in self-referentialism, which is always tunnelled through specialisation and privileged access to truth. Incidentally, this is not for them because that’s for science, but they’ve adopted it as scientism—man as Persons, Science as Scientism, and scientism as truth.     

The levels of foolishness and prejudice among the self-appointed guardians of reason are the most vocal people in the media. However, they’ve become less vocal since the Epstein case. In a philosophical sense – the paradigm of thought that doesn’t fit a rigid interpretation has no long-standing fixture (not permanent), as it shows through history; paradigms of thought and even myth are fluctuating concepts or transience.

We develop states of consciousness by understanding the best way we can about consciousness itself, and we will then have a clearer understanding of evolution. What is consciousness …if it’s not energy and not matter? Matter, substance, and all objects are concepts that arise in consciousness. These are things we conceptualise (we created) within the matrix of our consciousness; we think matter, and we think energy. Energy itself is a difficult concept to pin down; the fact is that these are concepts that arose from consciousness; it is the primary source of reality, and it is the fundamental aspect of existence. It is the one thing that was never born and is the one thing that never dies, and essentially the fundamental element of everything. Of course, explaining consciousness as an absolute is impossible; it’s like trying to look at your eyes without a mirror [the seen and not seen as it were]. We can, however, determine through excitation and experience of consciousness to that of reality because reality is experience. Consciousness is that which thinks, observes, speculates, creates models, and generates explanations, and by modelling patterns and regularities through experience, it can be determined within the laws of nature and laws of psychology, which are similar aspects of the Jungian archetype.

Any notion of idealism that consciousness reflects a process of evolution is unattainable because there is evidence to conclude that the universe formed before consciousness life arose. It is to assume consciousness arises out of biology and is therefore circumscribed by biology, so before biology arose, there was no consciousness; therefore, evidence of the universe existing before biology denies idealism and reinforces a secular argument by assuming materialism for the argument. When, in actuality, life is the localisation of consciousness, it’s a disassociation of consciousness; living beings are a disassociation alters, alter egos of the one mind behind all reality. Consciousness does not need to depend on biology for it to exist; biology is just certain images in the processes of consciousness.

There was a social movement in the late 1700s and early 1800s, a movement of liberation from the controlling system of religion, which focused on superstition as the focus of its control over the people. At the same time, the industrial era was present, with the combination of the two people turning to science to explain the truth. Constricting consciousness has led to many systems being categorised into a box labelled “mysticism/superstition.” This classification unfairly places fundamental concepts like consciousness, intuition, human connection, and paranormal phenomena within the realm of superstition. Doing so creates the assumption that empirical data and evidence are the sole foundations of proper thinking. Secular groups support such reasoning in this fallacy to uphold materialism.

Reinforcing the false assumption that consciousness is just part of the brain, even though they have no idea how it works. Even more frustrating is that the scientific process, especially in Noetics and the works of biologist Rupert Sheldrake, has proven that mass consciousness exists and is separate from the brain. Still, people seem to disregard this because to do so would be taboo, as well as one’s reputation and other scientific factors.

At least three concurrent processes are working in nature that humanity is subject to and participates in physically, mentally, and spiritually. Current evolution theories need to explain the higher faculties of the human being, such as self-consciousness, intuition, and inspiration. Esoteric philosophy has value to offer here; for instance, the sacred language of consciousness can be equated to the sacred geometry of life.

Consciousness moves through different states of being, constantly moving closer and closer to divinity to phi; every time consciousness moves towards a different stage, a rapid biological change occurs, changing into something new (ancient Egyptians called this resurrection). We are in the process of conscious spiritual evolution, and within those biological changes that follow, there is evidence that modern science has evaluated concerning DNA. A child was found to have three DNA strands rather than two, going from a double helix to a triple helix; this is not relatively new …the study has been around for two decades or so.

There was also a convention in New Mexico around the early 2000s, and the main topic of that day was genetic mutation; science acknowledges that we are changing, but with all the rhetoric aside, the result of such genetic changes is unknowable. From what hidden history tells us and also through sacred geometry, we can determine that humans once had 12 strains of DNA activated, but due to some event, ten have been turned off, which we call junk DNA. 97% of our DNA is unused, leaving us with 3% active. Still, those junk DNA are slowly being activated, going from two to three, and by imagining the possibility of getting back to 12 strands of DNA being activated (a crystalline being as opposed to carbon-based) that coincides with the 12 Chakras, the possibilities are limitless. The Bible mentions the coming of Christ, which happens to be the name of the third level of consciousness called Christ-consciousness; we are moving to Christ-consciousness, and some people are already there. We are moving to the level of understanding that Jesus had, which is the Christos to the human species.

Epigenetics and the Environment: The study of cloning stem cells opened up a lot of debate surrounding ‘genes.’ Those genes that control life, ‘genetic determinism,’ have been uprooted when considering the environment. When exposed to different environments, a test on the same genetic material produced different results. This means that genes don’t control life, but the cells’ fate depends on the environment.

New science delves into epigenetic control based on genetic control (control by genes). In this model … it’s essentially a victimization philosophy. This means you’re not responsible for your genes; you become victimized by your heredity. The new science of epigenetic control, which is about control above the genes – determines in response to your environment – as you change and respond to your environment, you change the fate of your cells. This gives you the choice to master your perceptions and, therefore, your perceptions and responses to your genes.       

This is fascinating because it is like biology’s version of the observer effect (and its waveforms) or magic’s language-based world that can engage with us. All of these are modes to answer the prevailing eschatological end-time scenario. In this model, however, the contention lies in misperceptions; if our misperceptions are wrong, like our simulated social structure, they can be detrimental to our health. This means there is nothing wrong with your biology, but our misperception of it causes brain signals to produce undesired outcomes that manifest physically. What are those misperceptions that relate to this topic?

Contention	The belief that ‘matter’ is all that matters (Newtonian / materialism)
Response	Quantum physics says; it’s not the physical matter that is most important, it’s the invisible stuff; fields, energies that shape matter – as the same way magnets shape iron filings. Which the mind plays a factor in. which shapes the world depending on what we believe.
Contention	The belief that genes control our lives.
Response	A disease in the body causes irresponsibility, if it can’t be controlled ‘genes’ why should people care. It’s not the genes, but the mind that controls hereditary.
Contention	The world is based on the struggle for survival (Darwinian model).
Response	Evolution is based on a corporation, a balance, as opposed to a struggle.

.

The Dialectical Timeline Discrepancy: Christians were unable to counter the emerging scientific findings (alleged evidence) that challenged the Bible-based view of creation. Dialecticism arises between a rigidly materialistic science, which tells us that the earth is billions of years old, and Christian theology, which insists the world was created 6000 years ago.

Darwin’s method (theory) makes us a chance creation with no divine intervention, an accident that relies on extremely long events. What they do when they have a theory they can’t prove is extended periods (distances) in a way that makes it difficult for you to comprehend in your mind (millions and billions of years). While introducing secular arguments that are impossible to argue against, for instance, the notion that an infinite number of monkeys in an infinite number of typewriters will eventually write Shakespeare’s plays. You will notice that they have mentioned that humans are just intelligent apes; being just animals, we can be ruled over, which is what it’s all about). All this is weaved around the Darwinian myth alongside cosmic, chemical, stellar, organic and macro; all centred on evolution that propagates this falsity.

Geological Conundrums: There was dialectical debate over Radiohalos or pleochroic halos, and they are evidence to conclude that Earth is indeed 6000 years old, as stated in Genesis. These halos are spherical shells of discolouration within minerals such as biotite that occur in granite and other igneous rocks. Including minute radioactive crystals (zircon, apatite, or titanite) within the host crystal structure results in circular shells (zones of radiation damage). This gave them enough to conclude that rocks didn’t form from molten but by creation, with more tests concerning halos of Po-218 to that of U-238, that these polonium inclusions decayed with a half-life of three minutes, reaffirming this notion.

Geological Conundrums: There was dialectical debate over Radiohalos or pleochroic halos, and they are evidence to conclude that Earth is indeed 6000 years old, as stated in Genesis. These halos are spherical shells of discolouration within minerals such as biotite that occur in granite and other igneous rocks. Including minute radioactive crystals (zircon, apatite, or titanite) within the host crystal structure results in circular shells (zones of radiation damage). This gave them enough to conclude that rocks didn’t form from molten but by creation, with more tests concerning halos of Po-218 to that of U-238, that these polonium inclusions decayed with a half-life of three minutes, reaffirming this notion.

The opposing view is that discolouration alpha particles emitted by the nuclei cause discolouration; the radiuses of the concentric shells are proportional to the particle’s energy (Henderson & Bateson, 1934). [Critics of Gentry, including Thomas A. Bailieu (Baillieul, 2005) and John Brawley (Brawley, 1992), have pointed out that Po-218 is a decay product of radon, which as a gas can be given off by a grain of uranium in one part of the rock and migrate to another part of the rock to form a uraniumless halo. Many radon atoms are caught or absorbed at a particular point. This phenomenon has not yet been observed experimentally but is supported by Gentry’s “polonium halos”, found along microscope cracks in rocks containing uranium halos (Wakefield, 1998). (Wikipedia)]

Fundamentalists often rush to support claims that lack solid evidence. For example, there was an incident in which they asserted that a specific Buddhist text states that the supreme enlightened one will prophesy a saviour 500 years after his passing. They further claimed that overcoming sin is akin to wiping a marble clean, where the time taken to wipe it determines that time and practice have no bearing on the redemption of sin. This alleged text was copied and displayed on a Fundamentalist Christian website. However, it was refuted by Buddhist monks and historians. This raises the question: Why would Fundamentalist Christian groups misrepresent themselves in this way? The answer may lie in their emphasis on “faith over spirituality” rather than “faith and spirituality.” This significant fallacy is often present in Kent Hovind’s teachings, notably lacking any references to consciousness.

[Back to the subject] Iron meteorites consist of iron, nickel, and alloy; 95 per cent contain iron-nickel metal, which means the metal is mostly iron but contains 4 or 30 per cent nickel, as well as a few tenths of a per cent of cobalt. Nickel is a metal rare on Earth, and it displays a unique feature that is never found in ordinary terrestrial material, which gives it an otherworldly perspective; mainstream science claims it is found on Earth. Possible hoaxes invented by mainstream geologists to misinform society of a grand designer, meteorites suggest a hyperreal space. Therefore, the notion of fragments of something otherworldly has merit, but not in the hyperreal sense, but in a flat and transfixed kind. Moreover, it could be a longer time frame for our Earth’s existence.

Epistemology Revisions: The false fact that we live in a physical universe governed by immutable laws is highly questionable; scientists have figured out that the speed of light is not constant; it changes and is in a state of flux. The notion of immutability disregards the quantum model, also consciousness being the crown of all beings, and the holographic reality. Instead, it reaffirms rigid interpretation, and science is the authority. In the previous essay, “The Only Way Out is In”, I mentioned that scientism is a form of magic; what is missing from that statement is that they are run by elite groups who practice that magic. Scientists under the thumb of agents practising magic, but not ordinary magic as nature-loving neo-pagans would have it, but magic(k) for gain, power and control. That has sinister connotations towards the four tenets of Satanism. ‘Satanism’ is understood as moving against God and not its early mythical etymology.  

					1.	The worship of the Ego (or self)
					2.	Moral Relativity (situational ethics),
					3.	Social Darwinism (survival of the fittest)
					4.	Eugenics (I decide who lives or dies)

.

Basic Darwinism is the survival of the fittest in a social context; only the species can get the most resources and fight. Genetic homeostasis is a scientific fact that can mutate and breed a species to the point that it becomes sterile or goes back to its original shape, but it can go outside those parameters; to make evolution a fact is to break homeostasis, which is undoable. The elite class needs Darwinism in order for social Darwinism to occur, so the guy who can manoeuvre around business is the guy who can make his way. The survival of the ruthless (corporatism) allows psychopathy to rule the world, and they need Darwinism as a model for social Darwinism as an implementation.

Basic Darwinism is the survival of the fittest in a social context; only the species can get the most resources and fight. Genetic homeostasis is a scientific fact that can mutate and breed a species to the point that it becomes sterile or goes back to its original shape, but it can go outside those parameters; to make evolution a fact is to break homeostasis, which is undoable. The elite class needs Darwinism in order for social Darwinism to occur, so the guy who can manoeuvre around business is the guy who can make his way. The survival of the ruthless (corporatism) allows psychopathy to rule the world, and they need Darwinism as a model for social Darwinism as an implementation.

New Age and the Accelerating Evolution: The sacred Geometry, the language of consciousness that employs the spiritual evolutional change from second to third levels of consciousness, coincides with the many dimensions of the New Age. The New Age holds much of its existence to the conventional current thought, especially with the human potential movement, which centres on personal transformation, which is that individuals can accelerate the evolution of humanity. This idea is removed from the Darwinian notion of natural selection, which states that an individual can do nothing to further the development of a species; one gene will prove advantageous to survival.

There is also a link between emotion and genetics; a researcher […] put photons in a scattered vacuum, and a DNA sample was inserted. They measured the photons and found them aligned with the axis of the DNA. Then, as they removed the DNA, it remained present, also known as the phantom DNA experiment. Science has bridged the gap between the physical and ethereal (or spiritual), and our emotions affect our DNA, which directly shapes the physical world we experience every day. Which mirrored the change in the heavy bodies; astrological motions serve as a clock to map changes and transitions, which reflects the changes in existence (as above, so below).

Evolution concerning the human potential movement bears more resemblance to French naturalist Jean-Baptise de Lamarck (1744-1829), who preceded Darwin by half a century. Unlike Darwin, Lamarck believed acquired characteristics can be transmitted to one’s progeny. Creative evolution is intriguing (whether you believe it or not), and it embraces the progress of the species more actively than a mere sac of genes. It was further elaborated by Friedrich Nietzsche ‘Overman’ or ‘Superman’ he wrote:

I teach you the overman. Man is something that shall be overcome. What have you done to overcome him? All beings so far have created something beyond themselves; and do you want to be the ebb of this great flood and even go back to the beasts rather than overcome man? What is the ape to man? A laughingstock or a painful embarrassment, and man shall be just that for the overman. (Nietzsche, F, Thus Spake Zarathustra n.d)

.

So this implies a distinguishing aspect of man and Superman, but man can enhance himself to be closer to Superman; Michael Murphy, co-founder of Esalen, states: “Meta-normal capacities…seem to develop best in conjunction with love for other living things.” He lays out the importance of love, and that love transcends and reveals fundamental unity with others. He also outlines that this new evolutionary domain is both spontaneous and transformative practice and is not limited to exceptional feats of physical prowess or paranormal abilities but includes transcendent empathy and altruism.

Alien Intervention Moment: There is a place in Africa called the Adams calendar where an unsupported truism is mentioned—not the place but the myth. It is assumed that a group of beings named Anunnaki artificially genetically created the Adamu, the human species that has links to Egypt.

The research that supports Zecharia Sitchin’s Annunaki concept of history needs to be more consistent with Gnostic and Genesis teaching. The notion of Adamski was developed to conjure enslaved people to mine monatomic gold by taking out part of the rib of the Adamski to manipulate the DNA, then implanting it in a woman for the woman to give birth to a genetically modified human. It is a retelling; according to Arcanum’s teaching, such a similar event occurred, and Sitchin possibly incorporated parts of those teachings into his myth (agenda). Some scholars claim Annunaki and Elohim are the same beings of people. Backed by numerology, Elohim = 31, Adam’s Calendar (Zimbabwe) is 31 degrees East longitude of the Great Pyramid, although I need to find out how much truth that is in a flat Earth model.

According to esoteric wisdom teachings Gods were androgynous, Shiva – Ardhanareshvara, and the Aztec God – Ometecuhtli. In the beginning, God created Elohim (meaning male/female, gods/goddesses); Elohim means the governors of creation, who were both male and female and were also known as angels. Genesis 2:7 states: “Jehovah Elohim formed man from the dust of the earth. He blew the breath of life into his nostrils, and man became a living being.” In Genesis 1:27, “God created man in his own image; in the image of Elohim created he them: male and female created he them.”   In Genesis 2:8, “Jehovah Elohim planted a garden in Eden, in the east, and placed there the man he had formed.” This man is what we know as Adam, along with the Garden of Eden existed in the 4th dimension. According to Esoteric teachings, seven fundamental dimensions exist: 1-2-3, 4-5-6-7/0 (illustrated in the Tree of Life symbol); angels traverse these realms and are represented as Jacob’s Ladder. 4th dimensions that exist as vital energy in Hebrew is known as the Yesod. Humans (Adam) needed to grow spiritually. And so Jehovah Elohim took the hermaphrodite man’s rib then closed up the flesh, then Jehovah made a woman from the rib he took out of the hermaphrodite man. Then, Jehovah said, “She will be called woman,” and since that time, man and woman have existed, seeking each other’s anima and animus.

.

So, within this narrative, it is easy to formulate that Sitchin took the notion of Angels and swapped it with Aliens/Archons, which brings his notion into question. Angels were clearly in some human form originally. DNA evidence could link human ancestors to common ancestors. So, one can conclude from apocryphal texts that those ancestors are from Adam and Eve and Kane (this is a heavy subject and is for another thesis). In Gnostic groups, ‘Jehovah’ is something of a bad word; it is believed that Jehovah does not want a man to be a reflection of him, the creator, and not a reflection of the Supreme God.

The Theosophical Option (for consideration purpose only): Blavatsky gave a third option in her Secret Doctrine (1988); she claims Earth is millions of years old and one of the countless universes ceaselessly out of the Absolute. The Secret Doctrine has an extended commentary on a cryptic text called The Stanzas of Dzyan. Some Scholars suggest that this work forms part of the Kanjur, the immense cannon of Tibetan Buddhist scripture, although sceptics follow such claims.

The doctrine suggests “the Eternity of the Universe in toto as boundless plane… ‘the playground of numberless Universes incessantly manifesting and disappearing’” (Blavatsky, 1988). [The book teaches that behind the generation of numberless worlds lies the Absolute, “an Omnipresent, Eternal, Boundless, and Immutable Principle,” which manifests in dual form, as “spirit” and “Matter”; the interplay of these two forces causes all things to be. (Hidden Wisdom, Smoley, R. Kinney, J 2006)]

[Furthermore, all souls are fundamentally one with a cosmic Oversaul, which is itself, but an aspect of the Absolute; hence, the “Esoteric philosophy admits no privileges or special gifts in man, save those won by his Ego through personal effort and merit throughout a long series of … reincarnations.” (Hidden Wisdom, Smoley, R. Kinney, J 2006)]

This alludes to the central idea of Theosophy: the doctrine of involution and evolution. A far more comprehensive teaching than the Darwinian method, Theosophy ascribes to the progressive development of everything, including atoms. All existence is taking part in an enormous cycle of the descent of Spirit into Matter and its eventual return to the bosom of the Absolute. Evolution is not a blind or mechanical process but is guided by conscious forces, personified as the seven Dhyan-Chohans, “Cosmic Gods”, who rule over nature.

[The Secret Doctrine teaches evolution although differentiated by the concept of seven root races, of which ours is the fifth. The first race, known as “the lords of the moon,” had only begun the descent into the matter; they did not have solid matter (Blavatsky jokingly describes them as “pudding-bags”); the second race is the Hyperboreans, named after the country in ancient Greek myth located beyond the North Pole. The third race was the Lemurians; the fourth was the race of Atlantis; the fifth was ours, the Aryans (not a particular ethnic group, but a particular human race that began a million years ago). We are the race firmly embedded in materiality, and we will be followed by two more Root Races, who will again become less material and more spiritual in substance. Eventually, we will reach Dhyan-Chohans. In the Secret Doctrine, there is a subtle dynamic between collective and individual evolution; throughout the gestation of universe cycles of races, each being, indeed each atom, is given to attain cosmic consciousness. Evolution takes place through karma, as played out in reincarnation. Although these two concepts have become deeply embedded in the popular mind, they must be clarified. (Hidden Wisdom, Smoley, R. Kinney, J 2006)]

Conclusion: The Darwinian evolutional method that changed the paradigm of human perception acts as an absolute authority, which may seem progressive, but in actuality, it is backward. Anyone who follows such a notion is misled. Moreover, for the most part, this is everyone because of the indoctrination of such theories to young children in our school systems. The result of such misleading intellectualism forms an excuse or myopic viewpoint that does not get challenged. Intelligent design questions the dialectical contention towards the Darwinian evolution method. The truth is … to the surprise of the majority collective whole, it tends to lean towards intelligent design and, therefore, also creationism, but it must include evolution’s micro-evolution variations as it explains an aspect of consciousness mutation changes; anything beyond micro-evolution is dogma, such as cosmic, chemical, stellar, organic and macro-evolutions.

Evolution is the movement from within to manifest certain “inborn” principles; the idea that a DNA molecule’s existence is formed through chance is wildly refuted by esoteric philosophy. There are ordering factors in the development of a cell; scientists (outsiders to scientism) have formulated through their calculations the formation of a molecule through mechanical and molecular forces and are astronomically small, let alone the formation of a cell. Biologists will realise there are deeper organisational forces of life at work beyond what they understand now, for instance, the biogenic radiation coming from a cell when it divides. Aside from the current scientific idea about evolution, there are more levels to evolution, and separate lines of evolution are coming together into the human being.

There is, however, a place for natural selection in esoteric philosophy (or teachings), the correct parts of Darwinism, like the ‘principles of natural selection,’ but the transformations of forms as a Darwinist theory is not a fact in nature. It is a ‘theory in transformation’ (more explanation can be found in Purucker, G. ‘Man in Evolution’). Reductionists, including Darwinists, fail to acknowledge subtle factors at work in the human race and in this world, many have shortcomings. Stephen Meyer’s book Darwin’s Doubt outlines Biological and Paleontological evidence that can convey the failure of Darwin’s approach. A respectable Dutch magazine reported that Palaeontologists discovered fossils in the layers of the earth that contradicted mainstream evolution theories. Instead of showcasing such findings to the world, they abandoned their excavation and kept silent about their discovery; one must wonder how many other findings are found and kept away from the public.

Nikola Tesla once stated, “The day science begins the study of non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than all the centuries that have come before.” Science should not confine its potential to preconceived theories but should remain open-minded. This idea is explored by asking, “How does consciousness affect biology?”—not just biology, but various other factors.

.

.