Mystics & Artist-Prophets:

.

---

.

Superpowers – Aleister Crowley: Ministerial of Laws & Magic(k): In the previous post, we examined the connection between Jack Parsons and modern rocket scientists. In a post-apocalyptic worldview, rocket science has transformed into a form of altar worship characterised by voyeurism through symbols and depictions of ritualised sex represented by rockets. The title “Strange Angel” is misleading when considering the hierarchy of angels; the fallen angels seem more aligned with the ritualization and technological advancement whispered to individuals to inspire them, such as Parsons. Alistair Crowley had a significant influence on Parsons, who was a member of the Thelemic movement. Parsons often referenced Crowley’s poetry, such as “Hymn to Pan,” during rocket tests, believing that it brought good luck.

Aleister Crowley is known as a British occultist, writer, ceremonial magician, and the founder of Thelema. He gained prominence for his work in esotericism, ritual sex magic, and mysticism. Born into a strict Christian fundamentalist family, Crowley rejected this upbringing early in life and immersed himself in Western esotericism, particularly in Alchemy and Kabbalah. Crowley never held a conventional job and instead relied solely on his father’s inheritance, as his father was a member of the Plymouth Brethren, a religious sect. Growing up in such a strict Christian environment, Crowley later confessed in his biography that his rebellion against religion would significantly influence his future endeavours in sorcery. He contrasted the Christian religion’s associations with sex and sin through his own sexualised and ritualised practices. At the age of fourteen, he had sexual relations with a servant girl, which illustrated his early attraction to sexuality. This desire can be traced back to his developing puberty, during which he felt a strong impulse to possess her.

His mother gave him the title “the Beast” because she sensed something disruptive within him, something that echoed the themes of the Book of Revelation. In his teenage years, he became acquainted with Kabbalah Unveiled and E. Waite’s ceremonial magic, eventually joining the Golden Dawn. Later on, he delved into alchemy, which led him to understand that magic is inherently connected to human will—the true, deep, instinctive will. He realised that a simple magical ceremony is not enough; moments of crisis or excitement are required to activate the partial mind and facilitate intuitive actions that can make ventures successful. This idea is well illustrated by the remarks of William James: “A man can play a game for years with a high level of technical perfection, and then one day, in a moment of excitement, something clicks, and the game begins to play him; suddenly, he cannot do a thing wrong.”

This intuitive act can be summarised in music, especially in improvisation. Give a scratch DJ a break-beat loop, and soon, you will hear a language of abstraction that can be taken over – you are no longer playing the music. Instead, the music is playing you. And, of course, like any other instrument, you still need to know notations, chords and tabs, and scratching has its own set of rules. This intuitive act provided a way to address a fundamentalist rhetoric concern that it’s demonic, but rather it’s magic itself, which has an intuitive component. Crowley states in his auto-biography this creative act:

I soon learned that the physical conditions of a magical phenomenon were like those of any other; but even when this misunderstanding has been removed, success depends upon one's ability to awaken the creative genius which is the inalienable heirloom of every son of man, but which few indeed
are able to assimilate to their conscious existence, or even, in ninety nine cases out of a hundred, to detect...The basis of the [misunderstandings] is that there is a real apodictic correlation between the various elements of the operation, such as the formal manifestations of the spirit, his name and sigil, the form of the temple, weapons, gestures and incantations. These facts prevent one from suspecting the real subtlety involved in the hypothesis. This is so profound that it seems almost true to say that even the crudest Magick eludes consciousness altogether, so that when one is able to do it, one does it without conscious comprehension, very much as one makes a good stroke at cricket or billiards. One cannot give an intellectual explanation of the rough working involved...In other words; Magick in this sense is an art rather than a science. – Crowley *

Crowley asserts that Magic has something to do with the subconscious process, and actual ceremonies and rituals are not “apodictically related” to it – as an accidental juxtaposition of chords and finger movements related to creating a timeless banger. Edmund Husserl coined the term “beyond all question” as he understood that conscious processes are “intentional” – and that humanity’s vision of themselves as passive creatures in the active universe is false. It’s a mistake to believe consciousness is flat, passive or mirror-like. This position of awareness fits Christian fundamentalist and conservative strongholds in the imagination. It does not allow it to progress beyond its censored style of communication. That’s why all artistic stylised Christian products come out stale in comparison to secular or progressive entertainment.   

To create a timeless banger in the realm of creativity, it’s essential to move beyond constraining boundaries. Humanity often lacks awareness of the connection between will-power and intuitive action, leading to the point where intuitive action becomes part of consciousness. In the context of Paracelsus, the intuitive act is refined by the understanding that imagination serves as a tool for this process. Imagination should be seen as an instinctual force rather than a purely intellectual impulse.

Crowley spent time with the Golden Dawn, but he felt despondent because the group refused to promote him to a higher grade. After this rejection, he adopted the persona of a Russian aristocrat to observe how much peasants would bow to a nobleman. He then moved to Loch Ness and took on the name Lord Boleskine, where he practised conjuring spirits by studying “Abra-Melin the Mage,” intending to establish contact with one’s guardian angel. As he continued to conjure more spirits and demons, Boleskine House, where he was staying, became haunted. This activity had a disturbing side effect: the lodge-keeper, who managed the premises, ultimately descended into madness.

His mission now is to discover new horizons, much like a Nietzschean explorer venturing away from the comforting campfires of humanity into the cold, mysterious expanses of the universe. He also seeks to understand how magic is necessary, even if his effects are produced by sheer will. He suggests that it will not operate in a vacuum—except perhaps in moments of pure self-awareness. It requires conviction and purpose. This quest is reflected in his choice to engage with prostitutes. He feels a close connection to the sin of the flesh and the figure of the Whore of Babylon, often referred to as the ‘scarlet woman’. This association shapes Crowley’s self-image, intertwining with his desire to harness the fluidity of will and prevent it from dissipating into the sands of forgetfulness and self-deprecation. He has immersed himself in Christian and Eastern mysticism alongside the Upanishads and The Cloud of Unknowing. Now, his exploration of the mysterious continues with Kabbalah, which presents the enigmatic structure of the ten spheres linked by twenty-two paths. He concludes that the outcomes produced by a religion do not depend on the absolute truth of its doctrines; instead, these doctrines are vital for achieving real, tangible results.

In his mid-twenties, Crowley spent his time mountain climbing and forming a friendship with a painter named Gerald Kelly. It was Kelly who introduced Crowley to his sister Rose, who had a masochistic kink, and eventually, Crowley married her. A significant event in Crowley’s life was about to unfold: Rose was pregnant, and his attempts to invoke “sylphs” (spirits of air) for her benefit had an unusual influence on her behaviour. The most plausible explanation for her actions is that she had absorbed Crowley’s personality so profoundly that she formed a telepathic connection with him, expressing thoughts that lingered in his subconscious. Rose claimed that Crowley had offended Horus, a deity she said she knew nothing about. At a museum, she showed him a statue of Ra-Hoor-Khuit, one of the forms of Horus, and he was amazed to discover that the exhibit number corresponded to the number of the Beast in Revelation—666.

Rose, whom he now referred to as Ouarda, began to instruct him on how to invoke Horus. Although the ritual seemed nonsensical to him, he decided to proceed with it. He later claimed that the results were a complete success. Not only did he hear from Horus, but he also made contact with his own Guardian Angel, whom he had been trying to invoke for many years. This angel’s name was Aiwass. Horus informed him that a new epoch was beginning, a sentiment with which many occultists of the time, including Strindberg, would agree. From here, Crowley was instructed to take his Swan fountain pen and write. A melodic voice from the corner of the room began dictating The Book of the Law to him, assuring him that this book would resolve all religious issues and would be translated into many languages. According to Crowley, it goes further than any previous scriptures by conclusively proving the existence of God—or at least, an intelligence higher than man’s—with which humanity can communicate.

This text may represent a romantic attempt to emulate the mystic prophets of the past, whose reflections often had an angelic quality. The Book of the Law, with its central assertion, “Do what thou wilt” (a phrase borrowed from Rabelais and William Blake), appears to be an effort to create a semi-biblical text similar to Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Its style resembles that of Oscar Wilde’s biblical pastiche in his prose poem: “Therefore, be good; dress in fine apparel; enjoy rich foods and sweet wines, including foaming varieties! Also, indulge in love as you desire—when and where you wish, and with whomever you choose…”

Crowley viewed himself as a prophet and considered his work to be of equal importance to religious texts. In his belief system, referred to as Crowleyanity, the central tenet was Thelema. He exhibited a god complex stemming from his considerable ability to manipulate spiritual phenomena. This sense of self-importance and the recognition of his achievements can be seen in his work “Shaw’s Man and Superman.” His delusional self-importance becomes even more apparent during a snow-climbing incident where his sociopathic tendencies emerge. As part of a group expedition, the climb was tragically interrupted by an avalanche, which buried the other members of the group. At the same time, Crowley, who had managed to reach lower camps before the accident, refused to assist in the rescue efforts. He later admitted to his blatant disregard for those who were calling for help and ultimately perished, stating that he wasn’t particularly eager to render assistance under such circumstances. This incident reinforces the idea that his character is reminiscent of a sociopathic oligarch or dictator; the only difference is his perceived spiritual superiority. It’s essential to note that he was living off an inheritance, lacked job skills, and saw himself as an aristocratic conservative. However, as his inheritance dwindled, he ended up broke and became known for scamming his followers for money.  

His path is not through spiritual enlightenment but rather sorcery, sex magic(k), and drug use (mescalin) – a path filled with group orgies, cult-like behaviour, and narcissism – a lifestyle filled with infidelity as he took on numerous mistresses. His wife Rose had developed a mental illness [insane] throughout the marriage, an apparent result of being near a narcissist. This occurrence would recur towards people who became too intimate with Crowley. In 1910, he was validating the use of sexual magic through magical ceremony while juggling a new kink in physical sadism. He opened a Satanic Temple, a place where his debauchery proceeded.     

The Great War was pursuing him, so he made his way to America, where he met a writer on witchcraft named Seabrook. Seabrook recounts one of the strangest stories about Crowley’s powers. When Crowley claimed he had gained extraordinary abilities through his vigil, Seabrook requested a demonstration. Crowley took him along Fifth Avenue, where, on a relatively deserted stretch of sidewalk, he began to walk next to a man, mimicking his movements. Suddenly, Crowley bent his knees, squatted briefly, and sprang back up. At that exact moment, the man in front of him also buckled and collapsed to the pavement. After helping him to his feet, they noticed that he appeared confused and looked around as if he were searching for a banana peel. Modern practitioners of the supernatural often conceal their powers under the guise of stage magic or hand tricks, using these performances to mask their true abilities. In cases where tricks are not merely tricks—such as latent mirror reflection movements, levitation, and conjuring—they demonstrate genuine supernatural skills.

He moved back to London and, after a while, relocated to Sicily with his mistress, Ninette. By this time, Crowley was in his forties. While in Sicily, he stayed in a farmhouse, which he referred to as the Abbey of Theleme. It was a place for meditation and sex magic. By now, Crowley has the title of an occult personality and has numerous followers. He received visits from Australian businessman Frank Bennett and ex-naval officer Godwin (Fiat Lux). Godwin started his own Club, with his style of sex magic aligning more with the name Karezza from the Karma Sutra. After this, another Crowley disciple, Parson, together with Ron Hubbard, had its sexual cult group.

Frank Bennett’s upbringing, like Crowley’s, was about sexual repression; Crowley convinced him sexual magic was a way to unbind his subconscious. Frank was an inverse of Crowley as he allowed his subconscious to express itself, which resulted in transcendentalism and pure delight. Crowley differed insofar as he bursts into consciousness uninvited, producing exalted states and visions. Bennett understood that his everyday self-awareness was only part of the truth; his subconscious self was just as real. This realization acted as a kind of release for him, plunging him into a state of ecstasy. He returned to Australia filled with the message about the Beast.   

At this point in his life, he had reached his peak. However, from this point on, despite living until 1947, everything began to decline. The promise of his earlier years faded, and a repetitive pattern emerged: extravagant ceremonies, affairs, desperate attempts to secure funding, negative press coverage, and his efforts to defend himself publicly. He befriended a man named Loveday and his wife, Betty May. Betty was unimpressed by the Thelema cult and often argued with Ninette, eventually leaving the Abbey. Another disciple, Mudd, entered Crowley’s life, expressing a desire to join Thelema and giving Crowley his life savings. Crowley left the Abbey and his small family cult to live in France. In Paris, he wandered around, dazed by drugs. Leah, Crowley’s current mistress, along with Mudd, somehow managed to find him in Paris. Mudd was tasked with writing a pamphlet defending Crowley, addressed to Lord Beaverbrook, the proprietor of the newspaper that had caused much of the trouble. Eventually, Crowley would abandon his friends once more and move to North Africa with his new mistress, breaking the loyalty and respect of Leah and Mudd, who would come to despise him. When his new mistress ran out of money, Crowley found himself forced to ask his American friends for financial assistance.

Crowley has returned to Berlin, continuing the same patterns as before, but it’s clear he has passed his peak as a magician. The remainder of his life, particularly about magic, feels anticlimactic and is dominated by legal troubles. Symonds, a writer, met Crowley after the war while he was living in a boarding house called Netherwood at the Ridge in Hastings. A photograph from this period shows him as a thin, elderly gentleman in tweed, smoking a pipe and resembling a retired colonel. His significant weight loss can be attributed more to his addiction to heroin than to a lack of appetite. Even after his death, Crowley continued to provoke interest. In his seventy-second year, he began to decline, and his bronchitis worsened significantly. He passed away on December 5, 1947. During his funeral service, Louis Wilkinson, a novelist and close friend of the Powys brothers, read aloud Crowley’s “Hymn to Pan,” which is as gleefully and shamelessly phallic as one would expect from him.  

Superpowers – Aleister Crowley: Romanticising the Beast; who had no Compassion: There is this perspective by magicians to imbue Crowley’s time in Netherwood as a sort of redemption arc for his life that embraced occultism and controversial hedonistic lifestyle. He was a tired Magus, physically exhausted, but his brain was still intact. We should consider that his past reflections and contributions to spirituality outweigh his sins. Nietzsche’s quote certainly reflects this implication “all great things must first wear a terrifying and monstrous mask, in order to inscribe themselves on the hearts of humanity.” Certainly, it was a way to create an impression in a time when modern technology didn’t exist; algorithmic clicks and likes for popularity minimize any monstrous mask for shock value. Such is the role of any artist who adopts satanic appeal and wants to shock the world.

His creative output can be seen as a form of self-expression and a way to explore complex ideas about the human condition. He sought to challenge societal norms and explore the darker aspects of human nature, often through his art. This artistic exploration could be seen as a form of catharsis and a path towards understanding himself and the world around him, potentially leading to a sense of personal redemption. However, are we just filtering out specs of his personality that magicians don’t want to confront?

Like his hubris and pride—similar to the pride that led Lucifer to fall from heaven—magicians can embody a similar kind of arrogance, especially in a medieval context. In Christianity, magic is often seen as evil and associated with the devil. This belief holds significant weight, although fundamentalism has taken it to extremes of nationalism and division. The notion that someone could presume to wield the same kind of magic as God represents a major act of hubris. In the context of the Golden Dawn, magic is viewed through the lens of theurgy, which is described as the workings of God. It’s important to note that this does not mean usurping God’s authority; rather, it involves a different kind of engagement with the divine. The initiation process includes this work. Aleister Crowley is often regarded as a failed initiate, yet he became a notable figure when Chaos Magick emerged.

What he took away from living in America is fascinating in the sense that he saw the country as key to the future of Thelema. He hated American commercialism, the dollar worship of the United States, and the burgeoning class system that was creeping into the background. He loathed the treatment of African Americans that was happening in the Southern States and was against the idea of white supremacy. He believed that as soon as a new, westernised New World woke up to its true spiritual potential, it would stamp itself as a great civilising force, and all people must fold into that spiritual evolution; segregation of groups is not part of that evolution.

He had leftist concerns for his time and not to be mistaken for true spiritual compassion as opposed to the morality of politics, yet he lived like a conservative aristocrat. It seems perplexing, but he was not enlightened; it doesn’t show he was empathetic because we know how he treated his wives and mistresses with discontent, with most of them turning insane; even his last loyal disciple, Mudd, ended up in suicide. He was able to recognise shared common sense as values and interpolate that with hopeful utopian sensibilities – contrasted against the stark reality of the Great War.   

He felt that America as a whole had not yet engaged with the animist spirit of the land but rather imported Christian models of European Religion; there was resistance to it. He had a prophetic vision of America’s future as a world leader that would supersede other nations. Still, he also foresaw the country’s collapse, remarking on the leaders and their role as a vital key point in the fall. Crowley, an artist-prophet of the new Aeon, reiterated this prediction and confirmed his psyche accuracy. As modern America is in shambles, a figure like the Archon spirit of Trump, born on Crowley’s Blood Moon, certainly fits the role of a leader who would bring the New World Empire to its knees. Not as a disrupter of economics but rather a glitch in the system —a man who rebranded failure as a flare. People took to it because they were inculcated despair, and Trump became the figure of that symptom.

He had a vision—a revelation of a child. He saw Horus ascending. The old order of Assyrian religion, which involves sacrifice, martyrdom, and blood, is characterized by a form of living death in preparation for eternal life. His reaction to this revelation was one of personal conflict, a struggle between a nihilistic sense of futility and a feeling of optimism. This is the experience of an aristocrat who is unburdened by the need to work for a wage, allowing him the leisure to contemplate an existential crisis. This struggle remained with him and defined him for the rest of his life. It became a burden that permitted him to remain outside any conforming sides; his scepticism allowed him to approach spirituality like a scientist, using a methodical process.

People assume this was a way for him to self-reflect, as he allowed himself to be perceived as credulous, egoistic, and exhibitionistic because he was derisive of himself. You can perceive shared common sense, in this case, behaviour, and apply it as a way to mimic normal behaviour; it was always about self-mastery before self-actualisation. He was unable to be empathetic. The death of Poupee, his daughter, from one of his wives, Leah, accounts for this shared behaviour; it is doubtful he felt any real loss, remorse or sorrow, considering his sociopathic tendencies shown in his behaviour in that mountain incident.

His so-called scientific approach to spirituality had its limitations, as explored in Frank Bennett’s work, which demonstrated that true enlightenment could be achieved. However, for Crowley, this was not the case; he intruded upon consciousness rather than allowing the subconscious to express itself. As a young man, he exhibited extraordinary abilities due to an overactive subconscious mind; however, he never developed genuine inner strength—the kind essential for creativity. In the last 25 years of his life, he struggled with drug addiction and alcoholism. He lacked a sense of spiritual stillness and, by the end of his life, was unable to connect with anyone on a meaningful level.

Superpowers – Aleister Crowley: There is no Karma of Love for a Beast that Dwells in Darkness: Some of the mysterious magicians in history have always had counterbalances to their greatness. Simon Magus, often recognised as the founder of Gnosticism, was a controversial figure in early Christianity. He had garnered a reputation as a sorcerer through his miraculous abilities in Samaria. When Apostle Philip appeared preaching Jesus, Simon had a change in perspective; he was baptised and followed the apostle’s teaching, accepting the Christian faith.

His faith was put to the test when Peter and John arrived. The two apostles were laying hands on believers and granting them the Holy Spirit. Simon was captivated by their power, and rather than seeking true spiritual enlightenment, he offered them money in hopes of obtaining the ability to impart the Holy Spirit to others. Peter rebuked him, saying, “May your money perish with you because you thought you could buy the gift of God with money.” Fearful of punishment, Simon begged them to pray for him. However, his credibility was now damaged. Prominent figures in the early Christian tradition, such as Martyr Irenaeus and Hippolytus, accused him of founding Gnosticism. This movement preached the idea of secret knowledge and regarded the material world as corrupt and fallen. According to this account, Simon even declared himself to be divine, claiming to be God in human form.

Simon, while in Rome, gained the favour of Emperor Nero. According to the apocryphal acts of Peter, Simon challenged Peter to a battle of miracles to prove his divine power. In a spectacular display, Simon levitated himself high into the air, astonishing the crowd. Peter, in return, through the power of prayer, caused Simon to fall from the sky, crashing into the ground and ultimately dying from his injury. This symbolic magical battle became the struggle between pagan magic and Christianity in the ancient world. Over time, Simon Magus became known for his heresy, deception, and misuse of spiritual power. Christian tradition remembers him as a false prophet, the man who tried to buy the gifts of God. However, in some esoteric and occult traditions, he is seen not as a villain but as a misunderstood mystic – an early teacher of hidden wisdom that the Church later suppressed.            

Magus’s counterbalance is Peter, and Peter’s power of prayer caused Magus, with his Hubris and god complex, to fall to the ground. Simon Magus, according to the biblical narrative, failed to grasp the true nature of spiritual power and the nature of God. He mistook the power of the Holy Spirit as something that could be bought or manipulated rather than a gift of God to be received through faith and repentance. He also denied that God was just, believing in a higher god who possessed the true perfections. However, this Gnosticism is different altogether; arguments about whether it’s a false belief system are debatable.  

Crowley parallels Magus in that both are misunderstood teachers who created significant works but also had their flaws. Their shared trait is Hubris; however, it is important to note that Magus was never the leader of sex cult groups. Crowley’s spiritual shortcomings are evident in his approach to sex magick, which diverges from conventional notions of love and karma. There is a clear distinction between the ego and the soul, with the ego often embodying a more satanic attitude toward truth—characterised by opposition—while the soul strives for love and understanding. Crowley exhibited traits of egoism, narcissism, and sociopathy. The concepts related to the gods of Eros and Magic were well-established in esoteric traditions before his time. In the nineteenth century, texts discussing the subject of sex magic began to surface. Crowley was just one among many Victorian groups that contributed to the discourse on sexual magic, alongside figures like Paschal Beverly Randolph and Pierre Bernard, the founder of the Tantrik Order in America. All these individuals shared a perverse interest in sex during a time when such subjects were heavily subverted in a conservative Victorian era.

Jung’s counterbalance was Freud, much like the pantheon of gods stands opposed to the titans, or as the anti-Christ contrasts with Christ. Even the artist-prophet Jack Kirby, who can be seen as a romanticized version of “the one above all,” was still counterbalanced by Stan Lee. This illustrates a natural dual order of things. Those who focus solely on science, rationalism, or new atheism often fail to appreciate the mystery of existence if they remain fixed in a perspective that does not allow for further spiritual curiosity. The theory of everything shares the same infinitude as Christianity’s future revelations. A universe that was created from a tiny pinhead, with countless particles moving outward, suggests that these millions of infinite particles are following incalculably precise trajectories back to wholeness. These particles fit together with such miraculous accuracy that by observing the perfection of any one part, we can understand the perfection of the whole.

Enlightenment cannot be grasped by an atheist, even if they are agnostic who see themselves waiting upon that miracle to change their minds; it’s the wrong framing. You are like the Magus without the magic. You see yourself as special, whereupon your judgement has more validity than others; only when I see this miracle will the world’s perspective change with it. It’s ironic that something so special (enlightenment experience) that is fulfilling and eternal – can become a “thing”, an object of the mind. In that, the preciousness is gone. Nothing has been said can touch it; you are nothing at all. Everything appears in you because of the vastness of the mystery of you. 

Crowley’s ideas serve as a counterbalance to those of Blavatsky. His explorations of sex magic are deeply connected to his experiences with infidelity and his numerous marriages, which he viewed as challenges to conquer rather than partnerships based on mutual love and respect. In contrast, Blavatsky was a lifelong virgin and, in many ways, did not fully experience the completeness of karma and love. According to the 12th universal law, known as the law of Gender, the masculine (yang) and the feminine (yin) are fundamental principles of creation. To become a master and a true co-creator with the divine, one must balance these energies within themselves. Despite her prolific contributions to occult and esoteric subjects, as well as her identity as a magician, Blavatsky seemed to view the pursuit of a romantic partner or the experience of falling in love as an illusionary element of desire. The ego often leads individuals to seek completion through relationships, which can ultimately detract from the genuine intimacy found within those connections.

The seeker looking for that one piece of text that will complete them doesn’t know what it will look like, what form it will take, or even if they have already found it. Such is the urgency of the seeker that they may pass through or overlook what lies before them—the seeker is blinded by their search for “the one.” what is the “the one”? It was present in every single text they walked past, ignoring or dismissing it in their quest to find it. “The One” wasn’t just one specific text; instead, it was present in all the texts. The essence of “the one” was hidden within the multitude. The ocean is represented in all the waves, without exception.

Blavatsky’s sexual life resembled that of a nun, devoid of pleasure in the physical realm. However, it could be speculated that any carnal pleasure she experienced was realised through astral projection during deep dreaming, where her spiritual connections, notably with Colonel Olcott, were fulfilled. The voice of the seeker is only regulated within spiritual dimensions, regardless of the circumstances. Blavatsky understood that the love we seek is not found in any single person, just as spiritual enlightenment is not limited to one teacher or guru. Love surrounds us, but we often fail to recognise it because we are actively searching for it. In the Gospel of Thomas, when Jesus is asked, “When will the Kingdom come?” he replies, “It will not come by seeking it. It will not be a matter of saying ‘here it is’ or ‘there it is.’ Rather, the Kingdom is spread out upon the earth, and men and women do not see it.” Our beloved is already present all around us; we need to open our eyes to recognise it.

Superpowers – How Aleister Crowley understood End Times Apocalypse: In the Book of Revelation, Christ is portrayed as fundamentally different—almost like a Gnostic hero-warrior archetype ready to strike down the wicked. John the Apostle, a distinct prophet from the Apocryphon of John (which mentions different prophets), hears the sound of trumpets. Then, a voice declares, “I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last.” In a vision that resembles a psychedelic experience, John sees Christ with a sword in His mouth and holding seven stars in His hand. Suddenly, he finds himself in a heavenly realm, where he sees a throne surrounded by a rainbow. God sits on the throne, with lightning and thunder echoing in the background. The throne is encircled by 24 elders wearing crowns, and several blazing torches represent the seven spirits of the Lord. Additionally, there are angelic and demonic beings with wings, each possessing a different head: a lion, an ox, an eagle, and a man, all of which are covered with eyes on their bodies.

The story describes the origins of the four horsemen of the apocalypse and the seven seals, which can only be opened by the worthy. The one who breaks the seal is a slain lamb, a variant of Christ who has multiple eyes and horns. Following this, John witnesses the arrival of the four horsemen. Each of the first four seals corresponds to one of the horsemen, representing conquest, war, famine, and death, with Hades waiting afterwards. The fifth seal reveals a cry from the martyrs, those who are stained, residing under the altar, pleading for the Lord to execute judgment and avenge their blood. They are told to wait for more deaths and sacrifices to occur, suggesting that this Lord is bloodthirsty. The sixth seal signifies a cataclysmic collapse of the heavens and the earth on a cosmic scale. Before the seventh seal is revealed, 144,000 servants of God are sealed and kept safe. The seventh seal brings a profound silence before the impending storms. Following this, seven angels appear, each bearing a trumpet, with each blast heralding different forms of apocalyptic devastation. The first two trumpets signal destruction, while the third trumpet introduces a cosmic star, identified as Wormwood, resembling a comet striking the Earth—the fourth trumpet results in a loss of light and a disruption of time. With the fifth trumpet, the gates of Hell are opened, unleashing demonic beings that inflict suffering and torment upon the living on Earth. The sixth trumpet brings forth an army of demonic horsemen, leading to the death of a third of the population. Despite these calamities, humanity does not repent. At this point, John envisions a Beast rising from the sea, characterized by ten horns and seven heads. This Beast is empowered by and accompanied by a Dragon (Satan). Alongside them, a false prophet emerges, and together, they establish global control, imposing the mark of the Beast as a requirement for trading.

A scarlet woman arrives, riding on a beast, drunken from the blood of saints and the martyrs of Jesus. Sinful and possessed by demons, she faces her punishment in the form of fire as the Judgment of God consumes her. Following this, all the key figures gather at Armageddon, where John witnesses heaven opening up, and the King of Kings and Lord of Lords arrives—this marks Christ’s return for judgment, accompanied by the army of heaven. The beast and the Dragon are captured and thrown into the lake of fire, while the rest—the flesh of kings and captains—are put to death. Then John sees an angel binding the Dragon for a thousand years in a pit. Afterwards, he observes a throne where the souls of the dead stand before it, waiting for judgment. John then sees a new heaven, a new earth, and the Holy City of Jerusalem coming down from heaven, prepared as a bride. There is peace and harmony on earth, but John hears a voice say, “Let the evildoer still do evil, and the righteous still do right; behold, I am coming soon, to repay each one for what he has done.” – Revelation 22:11-12.             

John of Patmos wrote the Book of Revelation during a time of persecution when Christians were seeking hope. The text resembles a blend of the Old Testament and the mythology found in “The Lord of the Rings.” Interpreting it involves distinguishing between three main perspectives: the Futurist view, which interprets the text as a literal account of future events; the Preterist view, which sees it as a symbolic representation of the Roman Empire; and the Timeless Symbolic view, or idealism, which focuses on the ongoing struggle between good and evil. Unfortunately, the Futurist interpretation has gained traction, particularly among the Bible Belt in America. For many adherents, it serves as a literal warning about specific events that are supposedly impending on Earth, which, in reality, have never materialised.

Some individuals reference external concepts, such as the Rapture, to support their warnings about revelations. The idea of being taken away and lifted into the sky to escape what is to come next resonates with them. Literalists interpret each seal in the Book of Revelation as a sequence of real events that will unfold in real-time. Because it is deeply rooted in archetypal mythology and carries a timeless quality, any perceived events or natural disasters on earth are often associated with their literal interpretation.

This view drives everything from political ideals and how they would vote, but more importantly its fuel for a type fascism that adopts end times eschatology. As Trump mimics corporate models of Mussolini resulting in authoritarianism. Trump, however, embodies the rhetoric of conspiracy theory and end times epistemology setting him apart. He collectivise numerous billionare groups to one secret state group that otherwise had no determining agency to do so. All of which had been preparing for the environmental destruction of the world, and his MAGA base are nothing but tools or pawns for a collectivise agenda to which Trump only acts the part of commander and chief leader.      

Fundamentalist Christians, now aligned with the MAGA movement, share similar beliefs about the end times and eschatology, particularly regarding the apocalypse and the rapture. However, the key difference is that these state cult groups appear to be actively bringing about the apocalypse through destruction and the exploitation of the world. In contrast, Christians envision a spiritual apocalypse that is destined to occur. This reflects a shared sense of a bleak destiny; however, MAGA Christians may not realise that they are not part of the Magna Carta. There is no secret spaceship available for them to escape on—they are simply pawns in an agenda from which they are excluded. They will not be lifted to a ‘Golden City in the Sky,’ nor can wealth secure them a place in an underground fortress. The Secret State groups operate independently of any nation, essentially forming a country unto themselves.

MAGA perceives Israel as a fortress state, a perception rooted in a form of racist nationalism. This solidarity within a white ethno-state is influenced by nationalist political talking points, especially regarding immigration. Such views tend to overlook the colonial and imperial rule imposed on the land’s original inhabitants. The concept of Manifest Destiny is often used to justify their dominance over this territory. This mindset is deeply entrenched, leading to broken constitutions, ignored Supreme Court rulings, proliferated propaganda, and unfulfilled policy promises.

During Trump’s administration, illegal proto-fascist forces, like ICE, were employed to round up citizens, reminiscent of the Nazi era. Furthermore, they used the Ten Commandments in a utilitarian manner, highlighting their far-right authority by prominently displaying them in school classrooms. However, their actions often contradict the very commandments and institutions they invoke, as due process is frequently ignored. Ultimately, spectacle and sadism appear to be their primary tools. The quality of fascism of the 30s and 40s had a future horizon, and this proto-modern conception is a dark void. Ironically, as a group that uses futurist eschatology, they don’t believe in the future itself, as they slide between prosecution complexes and survivalist modes of behaviour, utterly incongruent with the real Christian concepts of love thy neighbour, forgiveness, and giving.    

Crowley viewed the Apocalypse as a purely symbolic concept. He adapted the idea of the great beast from the Book of Revelation and interpreted revelations not as warnings but as a symbolic initiation—a cosmic map for the soul. For Crowley, it isn’t about the end of time; rather, it signifies a new era of consciousness, or a new Aeon, that embodies the destruction of old gods, systems, and illusions. For Thelemites, Aeons—drawing from Gnosticism—represent spiritual ages governed by different divine principles. Crowley described humanity as having already passed through two distinct ages. The first was the Aeon of Isis, during which divine femininity was revered. The second was the Aeon of Osiris, characterised by themes of death, sacrifice, and patriarchal religion epitomised by Christianity. Currently, we are entering the Aeon of Horus, which Crowley describes as the “crown of the conquering child.” This new Aeon symbolises the rise of individual will, freedom, and self-realisation, often referred to as the inner Star.

The apocalypse is not a literal end but rather the end of the old world, one ruled by fear, repression, and blind obedience. The whore of Babylon does not represent a siren drunk on the blood of saints. Rather, she is sacred, the divine feminine that rides the Beast of carnal and physical existence, fully embracing life. To Crowley and his Thelema religion, the Beast represents a divine force that breaks the chain of order, and the apocalypse is not about punishment but rather an initiation by fire, where the soul passes through judgment, stripping away false identity to emerge reborn. Crowley and his book of the law, co-created by a spirit being Aiwass, parallel the same imagery of revelations but are understood differently.

As revelation warns against evil, Crowley’s law instead embraces transformation in his central message, “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law,” which is about discovering and obeying your true will – the divine purpose you were meant to fulfil. As such, the apocalypse is a metaphor for tearing down the false self, the ego built on religion, government and shame – and instead stepping into your divine nature. It’s the death of the slave mentality and the birth of the God-consciousness.           

Mystics & Artist-Prophets:

.

---

.

The not so Great Man; Six Degrees of X: When Obama was elected; it created a perception that racism had been eliminated, as if centuries of prejudice against Black people had somehow been resolved. However, this understanding often stems from ignorance and influences political debate without addressing the underlying issues. The fundamental reality is apparent: political discourse frequently ignores deeper problems. The competing visions for social change in the United States have been at odds since the nation’s founding because they are fundamentally incompatible. This situation resembles a villainous comic book arc, where the belief persists that all groups not fitting a specific purity must be eradicated for the favoured group to thrive. This dynamic is reinforced by the “great man” theory, which serves as a placeholder, allowing any misguided individual to emerge and exert influence.

The great man theory is the idea that change is done by great individuals who see the moment – when a country is in crisis, then some person [like Trump or Elon] comes along and supposedly fixes it. It disempowers the populace while giving false-populace (MAGA) reasons to be more ghoulish, lazy, or unmotivated to extend change on an individual level, as this one person can do.  It collectivises the will of the false populace into the will of the supposed great man. It’s anti-democratic with a small “d” and inherently authoritarian with a fascist mentality. As Trump and Elon’s favourability becomes low due to their unconstitutional acts on the populace, they prop up themselves and each other on this great man’s propaganda. Trump even cited his supposed greatness as equal to George Washington. In contrast, knucklehead maga-populace defends Tesla and the people’s boycott of memes brought on by blue-haired woke groups. When we know the backlash is from the true-populace.

The Great Man has a heroic appeal, but ultimately, its romanticism is a device of fictional storytelling. The correct version of change in a social context where a nation is in pain amid a promise, and a promise amid pain tells us a country where all the changes that have come – have been the result of the collective efforts of the committed people waiting on no great man to solve their problems. It works from the bottom up, not the other way around. Yet, great non-elected leaders like Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. believed that all men are equal and endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights because truth and justice don’t come from the great man but from the creator.          

Joseph Campbell’s mono-myth is the basis from which the hero’s journey has been derived as a method for storytelling. Campbell’s A Hero of a Thousand Faces reduced all myths to a single archetype – the one who ventures out into the mystery and then returns transformed with an elixir or some transcendental/supernatural power to save the day. It’s a storytelling method fundamentally embedded within our universal shared psyche (or collective unconscious, as Jung would put it). They are not mere cultural constructs but inherent truths framed in the hero’s journey as an inevitable structure for our stories and, by extension, societies should function. Heroes’ are needed because that is what the collective will want and needs – that heroes rise to represent our will.

The mono-myth is not politically neutral as it also aligns with Western cultural values, whether in the hallmarks of war and conquest, its mastery and individualism over collaboration, humility and interconnectedness. Campbell’s totalising structure in narrative excludes non-Western mythologies that emphasise communal transformation and mutual support – as Campbell’s frameworks sideline those that might challenge its individualistic hierarchical values. The result teaches young men to see themselves as lone agents of change – measuring their worth by external triumphs rather than relational growth or unlearning harmful beliefs. Campbell’s interpretation of Jung’s collective unconscious presents itself as inevitable truths instead of cultural constructs, legitimising the idea of history being shaped by great men – that these great men are inevitable to human nature. It is a worldview inherent to far-right nationalism by having the lone (often white; often male) saviours triumphing over other racial and situational forces.

As a result, you get these anti-woke groups from entertainment bloggers like Critical Drinker and Nerdrotic to political mouthpieces like Matt Walsh, etc, [who are all horrendous YouTube personalities] feeling the need to act out in their way as lone agents of change. However, they are not simply making aware of culture wars and identity politics but insidiously taking concerns about culture and identity outside fictional narrative to context in real life. By embodying perceived attacks on tradition or threats to their masculinity by a demented outlook where certain positions must be absolute or somehow they are owned that position because of who they are or how masculinity had been envisioned in the past. So, they embark on a thesis of propaganda about cultural decline while reframing subjects discussed, like threats to cultural identity and personal identity, as existential threats. [They are hiding their racism and sexism inside pseudo-intellectualism]. As a result, males cling to fantasies of male power and great man, longing for the infallible hero or wizard of past novelties.     

The phenomenon of hero worship can become misleading, as it shapes perceptions in ways that can harm society. When audiences criticise artistic depictions, they often frame them as signs of weakness, which creates a sense of change that they perceive as threatening. This reaction mirrors the dissonance and anger found in Christian fundamentalism. Additionally, many of these critics are not actual reviewers but rather right-leaning commentators or grifters who engage in anti-woke film critiques that lack genuine analysis. As a result, their audiences may become conditioned to accept fascistic ideologies espoused by figures like Trump and Elon Musk, who are often mythologised as grotesque anti-hero archetypes.

However, these reviewers are shit shovelers akin to Twin Peaks Dr Jacoby, whereby season three has a webcast (Dr Amp) where his demographic is apparent to conspiracy theory types. He lives in a trailer in the woods and markets golden shovels over his webcast. The merchandising of shovels aspect coincides with anti-woke critiques and its grifting for monetisation. Dr Jacoby’sJacoby’s slogan: is “Dig yourself out of the shit”, and in the Lacanian sense means to dig oneself from the excessive jouissance to be able to create and perform in the symbolic. He is the central hub for the angry everyman as he verbally attacks the state, globalism, capitalism, the pharma industry, etc.; he is the inter-passive version of any right-wing podcaster. He delegates his enjoyment to his agents of listeners; they can enjoy it even when Jacoby is divorced from it – they are to dig themselves from the shit. However, they cannot distinguish the phantasma between reality and the Real. They, along with the demoralised, cannot come to terms with or realise which are the true demons that haunt them and which they need to get rid of or to tame [David Lynch’s chase for the sounds of the siren] supernatural reverberations throughout the phantasma and the Real – to acquire meaning.    

As their country is in collapse due to a Republic crumbling under a Demagogue [they and their followers voted in], they are all too silent after the aftermath; these loud-mouth shit-shovelers are no different to gamers who are non-masculine and would crumble if put in the position of warfare. They have a one-dimensional view of masculinity as it is modelled around Tate’s manosphere and a misunderstanding of the idea of “whiteness”, a utilitarian fictional method to implement instrumental reasoning. The idea that Europeans are one big happy white collective is a fundamental historical ancestral pedigree, which, of course, is false as most of them were at war with each other. “Whiteness” is a concept invented for one reason only, and that was to sucker the poor working class immiserated peasant Europeans into believing that they were on the same team as rich people. It allowed white peasant people to lord over those who were non-white – from a badge in a horse to a badge in a cop car.

The Kanya West effect serves as an example of modern simulation as it shows how Capitalism and white supremacy work together to co-opt something. To take something from its original use and recontextualise it to something different – Republicans often use Martin Luther King as an influence as a way to defend their racism.  Both King and Malcolm – X was Muslims separating themselves from Christian nationalism at the time; however, their circles were predominantly socialist, and both became popular after the Red Scare. They were part of a radical movement, and Reagan merely shaved the edges of the movement to appease black voters. A movement from the ground up lends more credibility than obscuring Cointelpro conspiracies, as it undermines its legitimacy. Marches stood as a symbol of change, but even in that romanticism, Malcolm’s new white interests and power structures would infiltrate or co-tail these movements. Radical change becomes policy reforms and, defunding the police and retraining the police.        

In the X-files [Musings of a Cigarette Smoking Man], the Cigarette Smoking Man (CSM), having just assassinated JFK, is a failed writer (artist) mimicking a fascistic demagogue of the NAZI party who was also a failed artist. A master of deception and self-deception wishes to be a creator, whereupon his musings are his own life, and his life is defined by making the real world worse. Despite admiring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., he decides he must be the one to kill him because Dr. King is speaking like a Maoist, and he has too much respect for the man to trust anyone else to do it. He tells Deep Throat that he never killed anybody, despite being responsible for two highly world-changing assassinations and others that are mentioned even when he was in the army. His efforts to tell the truth through fiction are perceived as too outlandish or at least not good enough on their own merits, such that the ending of one of his stories is changed.    

A ‘degree of separation’ measures social distance between people. You are one degree away from everyone you know, two degrees away from everyone you know, and so on. John Guare’s 1990 play popularised the concept, Six Degrees of Separation, which was turned into a film starring Will Smith. How do degrees of separation relate to synchromysticism [as synchromysticism has more layers], where art and artist coincide in fictional/non-fictional symbolic and semiotic echoes?

Will Smith’s infamous slap of awareness [Smith slapping Chris Rock at the Oscars], brought about by his ego dysfunction and childhood trauma [regarding his father inflicting abuse on his mother], has adopted a weird saviour complex towards the women in his life. The appalling incident also allowed a significant social orientation to be revealed, which is a lack of accountability for the sinner, especially regarding the rich and the elites. It is ever so prevalent in the Trump regime, where corruption increased three-fold in less than six months, overtaking past presidents’ discrepancies by miles.   

Malcolm X’s “X” represented a Symbolic gesture to his unknown African name. X has a strong symbolic meaning regarding where true paradise is/was. This becomes apparent in Musings of a Cigarette Smoking Man as the King’s death by assassin is juxtaposed by his speech of having seen the Promised Land and his eyes having seen the glory of the coming of the Lord – King announcing himself a Prophet. According to ancient myth, Paradise is Eden. In this land mass, the topography is shaped like a concentric cross/x – and below it is heaven illustrated in the Big Dipper throughout the four seasons centred on the North Star is a cross also. The Chi-Ro (X-CHI & P-RHO) symbolises the account of incarnation. The X symbol was also the symbol Mulder used to contact his informant.

A powerful symbol, where X marks the beginning of time from a certain perspective, it’s no surprise that oligarchs like Elon Musk are so fascinated by it. To a point he wants to claim it, don’t forget his family apartheid history. His ventures—X.com (now PayPal), SpaceX, Tesla Model X, the Everything app, X Æ A-12 (his son’s name), xAI, X Corp, and X Holdings—demonstrate this obsession. Musk’s interest in space travel often seems to carry a pseudo-scientific allure for the masses. His genuine fascination may lie in ancient concepts of space, such as Paradise, Hyperborea, or some significance related to an inner Earth. By the 1960s, it became clear that there was a limit to how high we could go in the sky. Musk’s deflection regarding his SpaceX initiatives—often described as a Ponzi scheme—manifests in his claims that Social Security is also a Ponzi scheme, which he uses to undermine the legitimacy of Social Security and validate his enterprises. His actions—taking from the retirement savings of older adults while benefiting from government grants—are deeply troubling.   

Stranger Angels: The Four Maxwells: Space travel as a technological utilitarian goal is a hoax, and Starlink Satellites are not what one might envision in their mind. There is some technological observation regarding buoyancy, which is below the stratosphere and not hyperrealism space. Elon’s predecessors came out of the sixties, and these guys were actual self-made engineers, not stakeholder heads like Elon. This was the original aerodynamics group that included Frank Malina, Jack Parsons and Forman. By late 1945, Malina’s rockets had outgrown the facility at Arroyo Seco, and his tests were moved to White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico.  

Frank Malina is the son of Roger Malina, an engineer in a group that experimented on Rokets in the 1930s in Pasadena – that would eventuate to Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the precursor to NASA. Frank Malina’s closest friend, Jack Parsons, was the most charismatic member of their group. He lived a double life, associating with non-scientist friends such as L. Ron Hubbard and Robert Heinlein, the author of sci-fi classics like “Stranger in a Strange Land” and “Starship Troopers.” Additionally, Parsons became involved in an occult group that focused on the dark arts and sexual fetishes, founded by the English occultist and magician Aleister Crowley.

Jack Parsons is a conflicting person/character, a hopeful engineer for the elite class whose centuries-old predecessors came from the Illuminate Council that instilled heliocentric hyperreal cosmology. Its worldview that expresses science and pseudo-science surrounding a fictional cosmology will inevitably gestate figures like Parsons. And because space is hyperrealism, its inevitable collapse will be spread out and throughout the populace via disenchantments and their apocalypse about their worldview and themselves. On the one hand, Parsons was a chemist with a rational mind, but he dabbled in occult ritual magic and participated in sexual orgiastic rituals. The limitation of science is further defined when he embraces the supernatural. Often, science has a nihilistic base, suggesting his motivation to reformulate all the types of fuel combustion is to test and prove nihilism wrong, as the Rockets will answer that unanswered question.     

Parsons and his girlfriend transformed his home into a meeting place for sexual rituals, where young women of questionable age were subjected to these practices without their consent. He would venture into the desert with his friend Elrond Hubbard, known for his association with Scientology, to conduct invocations they called the “Babalon Working.” These invocations involved chants and rituals inspired by Aleister Crowley, all hoping to summon unknown women. When he first met his girlfriend, he believed he had found his ideal witch, or “Babalon” (the scarlet woman) he was trying to evoke. Parsons introduced his girlfriend Marjorie to the world of magic, and in return, she introduced him to the world of art. Together, they became followers of Thelema, a new religious movement founded by Crowley.

Roger Malina’s wife is Christine Maxwell; she has a twin sister, Isabel; both are daughters of Elisabeth Maxwell, who also has another daughter, Ghislaine Maxwell, the wife to the once Jeffery Epstein. It was back then the same sort of sex cultist surrounded Epstein and his famous island. The current US President has links to Epstein and the island alongside many other celebrities. Trump was born on June 14 1946, on a Blood Moon [Lunar Eclipse] in Queens, NYC. Aleister Crowley had written a letter to McMurtry criticising NASA pioneer Jack Parsons and Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard’s undertaking of producing a “Moonchild.” According to Crowley and the Thelma religion, “Moonchild” is a supposed magical being brought forth by the spirit of the goddess Babalon. Steiner describes a cosmic being called Ahriman incarnating when disharmonies between groups arise, and Moonchild implies a magical being. Trump having been born on a blood moon does not imply he is magical in any way, if anything else, a disrupter. Strange Angel was released on Trump’s Birthday in 2018, and the first scene encapsulates a Blood Moon.

Trump, born of a Blood Moon, is Magical in so much as his ego drives him. There are parallels in the dates, but he is an Ahriman figure rather than the Babalon. The things he has done and what he set out to do are staggering compared to 2016 when no promises he uttered came to fruition. However, in 2025, he achieved his promises in his campaign as planned out for him in Project 2025. And all the warning preached out from those who foresaw what was to come was waved away by hopeful ignorance.

Parson foreshadowed his death as he is quoted: “Babalon is incarnate on Earth today, awaiting the proper hour of her manifestation. And on that day, my work will be accomplished, and I will be blown away upon the breath of the fire.” It was reported that Parson had died in an explosion in his Lab, whereupon he had dropped a mixture of chemicals that started a chain reaction. Strangely though, when the paramedics found him, he had whispered to them: “My work is not finished.”

Illuminati’s Council five centuries stronghold on how modern cosmology is perceived through heliocentrism began with Bruno’s false psychedelic-driven claim that stars are Suns will come to its climatic appeal in the grasps of an engineer where levels of validation are ritualised – in Rocketry science. Parson, like Bruno, adopts a scientific rational mind alongside a strong occult belief system, balances its misconceived idea that such polar ideas cannot work together and is proven wrong. In the TV series [Strange Angel], his inspiration is seen through symbolic hyperrealism dreams of space and the moon. I suggest his musing might have been angelic-driven, or even Babalon was working through him in The Moon and the Melodies.

The separation between science and cultism is modern, unlike the Renaissance, where it was related. Most of the essential figures in the scientific revolution were also practising occultists; now, modern concepts have polarised due to religious and scientific factors. Science and occultism have an understandable base and can be categorised in research or information due to the understanding between the observer and the cosmos having a reciprocal relationship. However, science and Science fiction are the motivators. Parson envisioned his idea of the moonchild to create an infant who would be born throughout the nine months of pregnancy and have magical influences surrounding the infant. The child [moonchild] would be separated from earthly influences and more compatible with outer space life. Here, Parson imbues the modern personas of Epstein and Elon Musk as all three saw the future of humanity in outa space – where a mutated or an evolved space child will deliver them.    

Epstein was the key figure in appeasing scientism world views; he would fund most of the current pseudo-science programs [like Transhumanism] until he was arrested, and as the funding stopped, so did scientism stranglehold. Later, after his arrest and death, his wife Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested on World UFO Day 2020, and incidentally, just north of her arrest exists Crowley Residence, and just North of his Residence is the famous Hill UFO abduction.    

The Roswell incident would occur one year after Trump’s birthday on June 14, 1947 – and the Roswell crash was closer to Corona, New Mexico. In 2018, one year after the COVID/Corona crisis, Trump announced the creation of the Space Force. Which is a Military service focused on missiles, satellites and communications. However, Elon and his Space X garnered many more private and governmental investors to reach mediocre heights, as NASA had laid most of the fundamental bases for Rocketry.   

Jack Parsons and Malina’s first investor was the Navy; by this time, Parsons had lost his wife Marjorie to Hubbard. It was said both Hubbard and Marjorie were in Naval Intelligence. Around this time, Parsons was voted out of JPL and started working with Hughes Aircraft Company. After the red scare in the 1950s, Parsons was accused of espionage surrounding technical documents being sent to Technion Society [a Zionist group dedicated to supporting the newly created State of Israel] that he was leaking data to Israelis. Ghislaine Maxwell has a maritime fascination, especially its aesthetic; she has/had a submarine license, and her husband Epstein occasionally wore navel suits mimicking Hubbard, who also had a license.

The last figure in these Six Degrees of X is Blink 182’s. Tom DeLonge co-managed the military intelligence project “To the Stars Academy.” DeLonge collaborates with Thelemite Peter Levenda, who has written books on ancient astronaut theories for The Stars. Levenda is a student of Jack Parsons, Aleister Crowley, and H.P. Lovecraft. He could be a valuable source of information regarding Ghislaine and the topic of UFOs. It’s safe to say that the Elites and the Rich, alongside the Military and Government, are all part of a secret (or not-so-secret) UFO cult.

Aleister Crowley: Ministerial of Laws & Sorcery: Parson sex ritual parties, inspired by Crowley’s debauchery and sexual practices, are concealed beneath the façade of Christian conservatism during the World War II era. This phenomenon emerged in a time when fictional Nazi bases were imagined to exist on the moon, alongside an era that was filled with death, mass murder, and mad scientists in search of Vril—a source believed to be meant only for a race deemed worthy of wielding it. Crowley, who performed rituals while using psychedelics, undoubtedly captured people’s interest.

For some, he is an inspiring mage, a spectral mentor guiding them through the dark jungles of the occult. To others, he is simply a student of occult history—a con artist with sociopathic tendencies who has earned a fearsome reputation. What about him resonates in the collective unconscious, embodying a perpetual struggle against the tightening grip of the new world order? In times of war, there is a heroic appeal to mythologised anti-hero types, especially as the new world order rises alongside the success of globalisation, which paves the way for its future. However, this new order has not achieved its intended success; only globalisation has established standards for world trade. The collapse that followed left a significant void.

Crowley seeded intrigue for the mystical and was perceived as an anarchist. He was also versed in mystery and had a heroic role as a secret spy for Great Britain. In Strange Angel, he motivates Parsons to succeed with his fuel experiments because the result would change the war. This suggests he wasn’t fully anti-establishment. It makes sense that this happened during the World War, and the apocalypse was happening in real-time.  

Trump was born on a Blood Moon, which indicates Crowley’s magical being brought forth through the magical intention to spawn a child capable of living in primeval space dimensions. However, he is not that being, though he certainly romanticises an anti-Christ type. Instead, he represents the same intrigue given to Crowley, and that is a blind fascination to Cult leaders to be transfixed or catechise an abhorrent demagogue proclaiming false anti-establishment rhetoric the same establishment he is part of; he realises the denial in the false populace who refuses to believe that he is part of that secret agenda that they protest against only allows him to exploit a demoralised dissonance in the populace.

Globalism is collapsing, which is a fact, but like Parson’s will for Science, it still struggles with remaining in the domain of speculative investigation. The examination of external scientific agencies is limiting or confining the imaginative process. Globalist aspects will disappear, but some will stay as they are transfixed, as DNA is to blood. Trade will remain a fixture going as far back as the Silk Road. Here, Trump plays on the notion of deletion, not knowing the dangers and exercising rampant nineteenth-century nationalism combined with old-fashioned protectionism as an international principle.

Trump’s disruption of the world’s economy makes no sense as a protectionist idea, imposing tariffs in hopes of crashing the stock market to set off the Federal Reserve, so such an action will lower interest rates. In a Pump and Dump scheme, market manipulation, a US 10 trillion debt set to expire in 2025, must be refinanced. Create and manufacture a recession so interest rates drop, and then refinance the debt at a cheaper rate – it’s kind of stupid. Such logic indicates it will speed up inflation and further hyperinflation; the notion of industry and manufacturing being made domestically as opposed to internationally, you would need an industrial policy rather than just mere magical words such as “refinancing”; the government needs to subsidise the industries that are already in the country. They already had industrial acts in Biden’s Chips Act, which started manufacturing in the US, which they eliminated. This indicates they are not serious and only speak bolsters. Tariffs without the industrial policy are just a “depression.” The utilitarian reason for victimhood in a trade where somehow the US [the richest country] has a raw deal [unfair trade] from other countries is preposterous and indicative of their delusion and lies

The inevitable foretelling of their national debt coincides with their degradation, and the isolation of the empire is an unavoidable constant. The narcissistic and unhinged reason for imposing a suicide policy is suicide itself, but to me, more precisely, to shoot other world allies beholden to the US dollar than shoot yourself is indeed psychopathic. The conspiratorial notion that intelligence agencies or billionaire Capital Groups hold the real power of government, which have plotted assassinations of presidents and populist leaders throughout history, seems all too complacent surrounding Trump and his neo-fascist/fascist regime, whose direction resembles Forrest Gump’s success of achievement. However, success is only in failure through sheer ignorance and idiocracy. I’d rather the slow ride to the inevitable rather than ripping out the cancer in an extreme reaction, because such an approach leaves you little recourse or any misconceived way out.

Crowley and Trump mirror each other in their approaches to lawmaking; Crowley emphasizes the spiritual aspect, while Trump relies on executive orders to circumvent Congress and the courts. Although this regime is often viewed as incompetent and led by a fool, he has effectively outmanoeuvred his political opponents and alongside both supporters. Gurus who promote the idea that being “in debt” can lead to enrichment have become prevalent in finance. Statements like, “I’m a billionaire… in debt,” reflect the schemes these individuals have and devised a get rich quick scheme. They charge thousands for classes and seminars and reel in participants using cult-like manipulation tactics. This same style of fraud appears to have infiltrated the Oval Office.

The self-interest of this party has overshadowed the needs of its constituents, leaving them in a state of confusion filled with unstructured arguments, manipulated facts, and denial. The laws of attraction are evident in the voting ballot boxes, but ignorance undermines overall morale. A correlation exists between Occultism and politics imbued in state cults; members of which do not exclude politicians especially those who are part of an Oligarch group.  

You are often left to rely on prayer, whether in the context of spiritual laws or the laws of occultism. Occultism faded but re-emerged in the 1960s, particularly within the hippie movement. Prominent figures like Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and Timothy Leary advocated for altered states of consciousness to achieve greater self-awareness.

A man would come into the scene claiming he had penetrated deeper into the mysteries; born in 1875, Allister Crowley was raised in a strict religious household – his mother nicknamed the ‘Beast’ from the Book of Revelation; it was a title he embraced his entire life. He identified himself as the anti-Christ as the force that would take away this terrible Christian programming, which had warped his childhood. Crowley began studying occultism as a member of the Golden Dawn – the Hermetic Order of Golden Dawn was the secret society’s movers and shakers of the Victorian age of England and was brought together by the knowledge available at that time. You had tarot, Kabala, John Dee’s Angelic magic, and Rosicrucian traditions all being melded together under a single system. The Golden Dawn attracted many of London’s Elites; however, Crowley broke away from them, and he found his system of beliefs after a trip to Egypt, where his wife received a mystical signal that told him to prepare himself from a message from the gods. Heading the call, he started to spontaneously write a book called the ‘Book of the Law’ – this book announces a new law for humanity that we are very emboldened and frightened spiritual entities to which we are like the gods.

Like Blavatsky, it was another merging of Eastern and Western spirituality; Crowley called his new system ‘Thelema’ – it incorporated principles of magic that he had learned from ancient Egyptian and other occult sources – and he became a self-proclaimed master of what he calls action at a distance. It focuses on the power of his intentions and will to create desired effects. Cowley defined magic as the art and science of causing change to occur and confirm in order of the will. His approach empowered the practitioner to make their intention happen and materialize what they wanted in the world. Thelema’s fundamental law was, ‘Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law; love is the law, love under will’ For some, this meant pursuing a higher path. For others, it excused every variety of deviant behaviour. Some critics say Crowley himself was its worst offender; Crowley was practising sexuality as a spiritual path. He reduced a lot of symbolic teachings to their essence, which is essentially the duality or polarity between the male and female, and he experimented within that sphere to understand what mystery is contained in the sexual act.         

Crowley started his secret society, the ‘Ordo Templis Orientis’, and wrote books about ceremonial magic, and he reinterpreted the Tarot for the 21st century. The Tarot is a pictorial representation of occult teaching; it’s a method of going within and contacting archetypal levels within oneself and spiritual levels and entering a meditative state, in which intuition is heightened to where you can see specific patterns developing because you’re in the right state of mind. Crowley created a deck of his own called the Book of Thoth, based on the Egyptian magic he studied. Today’s popular divination tool is said to reveal information about the seeker and the question about their future. Everything that is related in one moment is all connected, so if two people come together around a question and manipulate a miraculous tool like this, but if that manipulation is intended to serve the need or feeling, then it will make a mirroring reflection of the energy that is produced between the two people.                   

Crowley’s, like Blavatsky’s writing, was heralded as a forerunner of many New Age ideas, but despite his serious work, ultimately, he became infamous for his use of drugs and decadent sexual behaviour. His reputation was further damaged by advocating pro-Nazi propaganda during Hitler’s Regime power. After World War two, it was rumoured that Hitler used Crowley’s and Blavatsky’s writings to help create his theory of a master race. There was no evidence that Hitler read the works of Crowley per se, but it’s known that Hitler and members of his regime had a very keen interest in the occult, and they adopted mere trappings of occult symbolism. Ill and addicted to opium, Crowley spent his final days in a boarding house and died in 1947.

Like other occultists before them, Crowley attempted to learn the secrets of the gods only to be discredited and condemned by society. This type of backlash among great thinkers will always lead to persecution. It has to do with being forward-thinking, and they challenge preconceived perceptions; they make people uncomfortable at that level, and fear and threat make institutions and the people act against them.        

Individualism became the goal of young people who rejected traditional religion in favour of finding their connections to God. By the 1980s, New Age ideas had become mainstream. The writings of Helena Blavatsky and Aleister Crowley played a significant role in reinterpreting occultism for modern audiences and restoring their reputations. Musicians like the Beatles, David Bowie, and Jimmy Page had varying interests in Crowley, contributing to the development of a popular belief system that millions of New Age followers embraced. They chose from a wide array of concepts to create their unique brand of spirituality. However, the occult is still viewed with suspicion. Many practitioners describe it as a modern mystical quest, where individuals seek to transcend their backgrounds and histories to achieve a divinized or macrocosmic consciousness, which is seen as a path toward becoming immortal.

We feel like we have displaced ourselves from something (and instead are led down a path of materialism), and we are trying to find our way back to that something we have lost, that loss of connectedness and our understanding of our human roots. The desire for New Age interest stems from that desire to reconnect with our history to make us feel whole, spiritual, connected, and aware.  

What began as occult magic has significantly influenced the world of science, leading astrology’s evolution into astronomy and alchemy into chemistry. Among the secrets that early practitioners sought were those related to achieving eternal life and transforming humanity (Alchemy) into a god-like state. Particle physics suggests that life is fundamentally pure energy, indicating a possible connection between these ancient ideas and the modern understanding of existence. It emphasises that the power to become god-like lies in the ability to transform oneself.

Additionally, medicine has benefited from occult traditions, with holistic approaches proving vital for scientific breakthroughs. However, beliefs—whether rooted in science or religion—can sometimes blind us to alternative possibilities. Occult experiments keep minds open to new ideas. Despite the advancements in science, the modern world remains shrouded in mysteries that may never be fully understood. This unknowable aspect, this mystery, lies at the heart of both spiritual and scientific quests. In many ways, one could argue that the purpose of life is to seek out and explore these mysteries.

.

.

.

Mystics & Artist-Prophets:

.

---

.

Superpowers – Elon; Neo-Demagogue – Stealing Words then Casting Spells: The stealing of words can be used as a utility insofar as to invert its meaning alongside grifter intellectuals implying doubt over known facts, notably, that fascism has always been right-wing. They re-energise terminologies like “National Socialism”, indicating fascism as a nationalist socialist movement. By the very nature of that doubt assumes polarisation, there is no ambiguity it’s not amorphous; fascism has never been a socialist movement. There is no uncertainty to have about Hitler’s policy, and to introduce such a fallacy imports an indeterminate factor like doubt, it’s ludicrous because we do know.

Robert O Paxton’s “The Anatomy of Fascism” states: “The ultimate fascist response to the Right-left political map was to claim that they had made it obsolete by being ‘neither Right nor Left,’ transcending such outdated divisions and uniting the nation.” This is a claim many intellectuals have used to muddy the waters about the clear fact that it is right-wing. Claims that think otherwise usually come from [think tanks] anarcho-capitalist Institutions and poorly researched authors and podcasters. It is the response of the fascist to cast doubt about facts or to claim it is neither left nor right, and this goes beyond Agrippa’s split in reason, as the former is more agenda-driven.

Left-wing politics is about social equality and egalitarianism, often opposing social hierarchies as a whole or certain social hierarchies. Right-wing politics is a range of political ideologies that view certain social orders and hierarchies as inevitable, natural, or desirable, typically supporting this position based on natural law, economics, authority, property, religion, or tradition. Inequality is seen as a result of traditional social differences or competition in market economics.   

There were no cooperatively foreign businesses owned by all the people for the people and distributed to the people. Redistribution was not high on the Nazi regime of things to do. It shouldn’t confound it with doubt – where, for the most part, was a bid to appease the middle-left and centre-left of the Communist Party of Germany by calling themselves Nationalist Socialists. The Nazis did the very opposite of left-wing politics by privatizing industry as enriches businesses and political elites without benefiting consumers or taxpayers.

The Nazis loosened gun laws for –non-Jews and abortion was becoming less severe, leading to the Nazi’s rise – and when they took power, they heavily punished Aryans [a term stolen from theosophy] and encouraged it for undesirables. As for healthcare, they had a system in place since 1883, but the Nazis made it more exclusionary. The book – The Third Reich in Power states: “Nazi ideology neither did nor in principle favours the idea of social welfare.” … “The Nazi Party frequently condemned the elaborate welfare system they had grown up under the Weimar Republic.”

The Nazi Dictator himself said he stole the word socialism back from Marxists as they confused the meaning: “I shall take socialism away from the socialists” – as he believed socialism came from Germany. Of course, he was lying – the same lies and blatancy Trump promoted in his campaign, and only now, his followers are finding out.

Elon claims the Nazis were socialist lefties, a claim that is incongruent with the fascist movement in South Africa during the Apartheid. A time, in which Elon grew up, we would assume that experience alone would impart firsthand examples and reinforce the disingenuousness of that comment. It is a fact the Nazis killed over a million civilians because of their political affiliation – most of them socialists and communists.

Right-wing grifters like Jordan Peterson would have you believe national socialists’ killing other socialists is expected to undermine the tolerant left position. We’ve established the title ‘national socialism’ is an oxymoron, and it was really about the Nazi regime going against the basic foundations and mechanism of socialism. They wanted to roll back the industry into industrial serfdom. It’s important to recognise that a billionaire industrialist is saying that the Nazis were socialists, and one of the bad things about the Nazis is that they were so far-left socialists – it is just Nazi propaganda. The Nazis crushed the workers and exalted the bosses. Elon lies for the Nazis while literally saying the Nazis lie; it’s not surprising, as commonly shared knowledge perceived most industrialists and capitalists will always go against the labour class.     

Right-wing pundits like Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro, Dave Rubin, and the whole PragerU groups of conservatives are flying monkeys of Elon’s & Trump’s shame and guilt. They rely on instrumental reason that doesn’t exist or utilitarianism used as reason where humanity’s moral encapsulation is transfixed one way.  Jordan Peterson had said he hadn’t read beyond “Communist Manifesto,” and he props up this document so much. Hence, it extends to a type of utility whereby all human capacity and thought are boxed in this Communist Manifesto and no other. How about reading Marx’s several or more books? – They cannot because it offers better rebuttals to their narrowness and debunks his instrumental reason guise as postmodern neo-Marxism.     

In his latest work, “Don’t Burn This Book”, Dave Rubin compares socialism to Nazism and fascism by claiming that Benito Mussolini was “raised on Karl Marx’s “Das Kapital”.” This assertion overlooks Mussolini’s later actions to imprison and silence Marxists and other perceived “enemies of the nation.” Similarly, Ben Shapiro’s “How to Destroy America in Three Easy Steps” recycles familiar critiques of Marx’s labour theory of value, ironically praising John Locke for rightly stating that property ownership is an extension of one’s labour. Locke argues that when we remove something from its natural state and mix our labour with it, we make that property our own. This critique of Marx, especially by Peterson, Rubin, and Shapiro, is notable; they often repeat clichés about the importance of hard work and spirited debate without engaging with his ideas.

Anti-woke has become as extreme as woke itself to a point it’s more devastating to the populace that despises it. As much as Woke is abominable, it doesn’t go beyond reimaging already appreciated artworks and destroying the imaginative faculties of the original artist. It’s got to the point where corruption [and neo-fascism] in the form of a Coup has a stranglehold on government that affects the populace, the same populace that put those managers of that government into power. We know Elon’s guilty, but because half the populace is so demoralised, all he has to do is spell cast an (x)tweet deflection where it composes woke subtlety. His guilt is deflected onto the system of deep government and the courts, and we know he bought his position and bought the courts that appointed Trump into position. The administration uses the same process of spell casting merely to deflect the blame into woke – and people living in a post-truth world believe it without question. Most are young manosphere-loner gamers who don’t know any better. Unfortunately, it is with ignorance and lack of grace that their neo-fascist government is stealing from them and destroying their livelihood.    

.

Elon’s company, Tesla, is well known for rampant racism or racial discrimination, often paying out lawsuits that have been made against Tesla. His cars usually pass unregulated safety checks, causing possible harm to civilians. When cases were brought to attention, data and evidence were wiped out from the Tesla cars that housed that information. Even before Trump entered office, he claimed to deregulate everything as it burdened the populace. The kind of deregulation needed, especially concerning safety, he had made anti-sematic (x)tweets, and he had told advertisers to “F” off, which later he recounted as advertisers have foundational standing regarding profit and what holds social media platforms in business. Post-inauguration, Wall Street is backing out, his Tesla sales have become toxic, and sales have dropped.

This puts his wealth into question, whether it’s all fluff, as he is trying to procure data illegally [in a coup] through the treasury. Through the utilitarian justification of a non-government institution [DOGE] employing a young group of computer nerds to hack and steal data. Not through accountants, economists, civil servants and lawyers, but nerds. He is equal in debt as he is paid in shares, and the latest surveys indicate his Tesla Company is heading towards bankruptcy. This motivation was long in the works as it has something to do with an attempt to buy out openAI, which he is in a legal lawsuit. He wants to own it so he can create a Chabot called GSAi together with DOGE, and he wants to use its [AI] technologies to cut costs and modernise the US government. I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s archetypically aligning himself as a digital megalomaniac overlord as a roost just to loot the treasury and siphoned money into his pockets. Or to privatise government systems [treasury systems [in some weird App model] undermining an already competent process. Or siphon money to go towards their version of the Sovereign Wealth Fund; external to a global version of the sovereign fund that they are already part of.

Superpowers – Elon; Neo-Demagogue – Nonconformist Leader of Nerds & Post-Truth-(ers): MAGA cults, nationalist white supremacists, right-wing Christian & conspiracy- theory fundamentalist groups, and traditional conservative right-wing Christians are beyond reason at this point. They are fully demoralised and live in a “post-truth” environment. In the great theatrics of debate and the appeal to vote – collectively, they were the majority voters. Post-election, most of those voters, in their ignorance, had faith in their government that they wouldn’t lie about promises; little did they know. Some are regretful that they voted against their interest; these are policy voters who have appealed to labour. They can vote either way. The independent voters are complicit in the demise of a failed system, or maybe they understand that left and right, like Communism and Fascism, are seen as utility for marginal dialectic on the extremes of reason. If anything else, [independent voters] are responsible for speeding up their/your demise rather than slowing down projected inevitability. It’s the remaining 30 per cent that is left over the “post-truth” types, immovable voters, which raises a lot of fundamental and philosophical problems.   

Qanon had flooded information to a populace about conspiracy theories, and instead of awakening them, it initiated them towards a cult. They were unable to discern decades of conspiracy theory in one setting. This means they are missing intellectual mechanisms for questioning theoretical conspiracism in expressing any unstructured doubt. For instance, in the hierarchy of evil, the Democrats are the culprit, as opposed to the polar other [Republicans]. Or an external other in the form of a mystery, such as pagan-like apocryphal myths or secret state-cult groups who collectively consent to demonic angel worship. Instrumentalism’s reason is redirected, where all evil is compressed into one political party. This behaviour positions them as abnormal in an apocalyptic [revealing] world [as opposed to normal behaviour] – where they are more engendered by post-magical thinking rather than rational thought. The right-wing further bolsters misinformation that they relay and often create on social media. When you have a demagogue and neo-demagogue that reinforces their speculation, it only spurs them further into their delusion.  

There is a clear distinction between the abnormal cults imbued in “post-truth” and truthers who have been in the game for three decades or more; they are just helpful esoteric seekers of knowledge more than anything else. Not only have Post-truthers created an evil left-absolutism, but they are also inflexible. Any attempt to educate or use sensible explanations gets caught up in the weakening structures of the argument accompanied by misleading or misunderstood ideologies like “postmodern neo-Marxism” – “cultural Marxism” or anti-woke sentiments, and so forth, arguments as sterile [or proven wrong] as the ideologies are as irrelevant. The digital platform has created bubbles of subsets where there is a split in the method of self-criticism as it’s more a source of a self-justifying medium that generates its own logic.

We’ve established that the right wing is “post-truth”, and the circumstance of post-truth gets its foundation in postmodernism, which is not entirely correct. Three prominent understandings of postmodernism are understood:

• Frederick Jamison who said it was the weakening of history and the lack of depth and the waning of effect.

• Jean Francois Lyotard describes it as a rejection of grand narrative like the universal structures like progress.

• Derrida claims there is nothing outside of text, so any claims to universal truths is undercut.

When contrasted together, we assume the world is fiction or fabrication, a difficult notion for anyone to grasp, even left and right thinkers, as it imparts a transient universe that questions an objective universal truth.

Post-truth typifies postmodernism as scepticism, then becomes exclusionary [especially in the right wing], further reinforced by Christian-conspiracy-fundamentalism, resulting in a right-wing post-truth worldview. Post-truth is a general characteristic of our age rather than postmodernism itself, as it is predominantly led by propaganda alongside neoliberal valorisation of the individual. However, you don’t want to entangle postmodernism with the relativity of individual subjectivity. It’s not a consequence of postmodernism because you must imply that it’s a consequence of scepticism. Postmodernism is more of an aesthetic and philosophical project than a consumerism and mass culture characterised as neoliberalism.    

It’s not postmodern to be sceptical about scientific evidence of climate change; it is scepticism – climate change is utilitarianism guise as instrumental. Its semantics are more astute, where a stronger focus towards pollution and deforestation has better merit. It feels disingenuous to arouse environmental risks solely on climate change. Postmodernism is not equal to failure in neoliberalism; however, neoliberalism is a failed concept and continues to be so. Trumpisim is a cult that uses scepticism and lies as a utility that gets misconstrued as postmodernism. Scepticism in itself is also not a failure nor a full believer or disbeliever because it just seeks.      

Agrippa’s split in reason has never been as relevant to modernity as it strengthens history; it also exemplifies a depth or perspective that’s refreshing and contrary to modern functions of rationality as it illuminates the imagination. He rejected aspects of Scholasticism and was a complete scholar and believer of Geocentrism. He indeed rejected the looming Illuminati council’s agenda of instrumental reasoning that would later become a pure reason for a heliocentrism worldview. He is a historical sceptic and a modern surrogate character for seekers of truth. In these assertions, besides some details, the former or the latter is a fact. Moreover, it’s a postmodern argument [for modernity] as it questions the grand narrative of your cosmology. Your answer is as close as possible to a totalising rational truth.        

You cannot move beyond postmodernism or even scepticism because it assumes the mechanism of the world has been explained fully through rational absolutes [science]. Moving beyond postmodernism via post-postmodernism is a failure to grasp the mystery, to turn blind to the unexplainable because you cannot grasp postmodernism in the first place. Such a denial appeals to right-wing conservative intellectuals and academic science types who advocate scientism’s success but fail to do so as it is a guise to prop technocracy that will ultimately lead to totalitarianism.

Conservatives’ antipathy towards postmodernism develops into an anti-oppressive movement [anti-woke]. They feel it undermines various meta-narratives like Christianity & science. Also, the kind of meta-narratives and hegemony of race, class, gender, and sexuality; however, you can reject all of this hegemony without buying into lousy philosophy. Implies postmodernism is a bad philosophy. It isn’t good if it’s misunderstood or if one is to purposely reframe where it’s tunnelled through a false assumption of power.

When Lyotard equates to power and reason, often labelled postmodern, it serves as an activist strategy against the coalition of power and reason. However, this equation is frequently misunderstood. We do not have to fight against this coalition; rather, it is an inevitable part of both knowledge and power. It can be seen as neither inherently good nor bad but encompassing both qualities. Derrida and Foucault were not primarily focused on acquiring power. Their interest lies in analysing how power operates within society. While Derrida discusses power, his method of deconstruction is not intended to gain power. Instead, it aims to challenge claims of absolute knowledge and critically examine the trends of knowledge acquisition in Western philosophy. Similarly, Foucault’s examination of genealogical history does not focus on how to gain power but on how power has been used, abused, and transformed throughout history.

Conservatives’ habitual antipathy towards postmodernism (ironically) enables postmodernism through their conservative philosophy. Examined when right-wingers claim that wokeism is derived from postmodernism [it’s the same false instrumental reason regarding socialism in the national-socialism argument discussed before]. It’s a Straw-man argument to fight against “wokeness,” according to Woke, any equality are the fault of a system of power dynamics, but to the conservatives – none are, as wokeness has its roots in postmodernism. As it was originally, Marxism focused on economics, socialism, communism, etc., but it got warped into being [Marxism] about culture and race.

By that logic, Cultural Marxism and Wokeism are the same – as is Cultural Marxism to SJW as Postmodernism-Neo-Marxism is to Political Correctness. Yet many right-wing adherents claim superiority as if they were the true custodians of various liberation movements. It’s often a reactionary movement from liberation movements that are politically correct or have updated it to something more repudiable. Nevertheless, actual liberation movements have always relied upon careful marshalling of facts and evidence to make up for the fact that they don’t have power and wealth. Reject the mechanism, not postmodernism, in which objective facts and truths are repurposed through right and wrong, and doing so plays into the hands of forces of darkness.   

As a reminder [and it’s important to know & memorise], wokeness didn’t come from postmodernism; wokeism was derived from the new-atheist movement. Wokeism was a critique of Marcuse, who uttered culture war rhetoric and identity politics. Still, the founder of the Frankfurt School saw it as unremitting criticism that was oppressive and dehumanising, and the critique was barred. This critique still proceeded to flood modernity, predominantly in the media, creating many reactions and destabilisation.  

It is post-truth, not postmodernism that encourages people’s apathy and ignorance; scepticism brought them there in the form of conspiracy theory and incorrect interpretations of symbols, myth, and hidden history allowed what Ralph Keys calls a reinforcement of opinion; echo chambers existing in an ethical twilight zone. It is only relevant to postmodernism as it describes our modern age, and as it relates to post-truth populists, it is an age without reason. In essence, post-truth politics signifies a shift from focusing on evidence-based arguments to a landscape where raw emotion and manufactured outrage often dictate popular discourse. I would argue that this is more scepticism and claim that post-truth is the reaction of being overwhelmed by evidence-based arguments that are simulated or fake but perceived as empirical, and the drive to make it spurs an unconscious endorsement of an agenda. At the same time, they cannot discern when it is evidence-based fact.    

Ironically, the reaction towards woke had been superseded by its response to anti-woke, as it does more harm than anyone could predict. The divide between the rich and poor becomes extremely split and is managed by something else, not economics but a beast. Entities that prints money and then sell it back into the marketplace by those who caused the crisis. Economists and intellectuals warn the populace by any means so that the citizenry does not fall into the trap of more populism and allow the populace to divide us. Post-US-election illustrates the warning didn’t work. Anti-woke, post-truth [and alt-right] populism have symbiosis marriage, but cannot fathom that merely changing the mermaid’s Ariel from white to black is far more concerning than evaluating Oligarchs, demagogues and their corruption. Or by the utility of reason, attaching activists to judges as “activist-judges,” as this modern jargon will delegitimise the competency of judges. All a while disregarding the corruption of judges who empower the presidency role with immunity.    

After the economic crisis of the 30s in the United States, social security and health care had been a way to establish a safety net to keep an ensuing collapse from happening. Despite its mismanagement in the decades to come, it was a success. However, the rational systems of the time allowed themselves to be dismantled over imposing values that would lead to a crisis. They kept tinkering and collecting money from the citizens’ money jars as a substitute for the problem itself. As a result, this beast from the sea grew through power and depredation of guilt – the hand in the Cookie/Conspiracy Jar made apparent.

Elon’s Coup as he takes hostage the US’s Treasury & Social Security with his band of merry men of coders. It was not approved by Congress, making it illegal. It is interesting to know that the tinkering of Social Security is not new; what has changed? It’s a spectacle. It has a theatre about it. It’s as theatrical as 9/11 was an inside job; in a Post 9/11 apocalyptic modernity, you wouldn’t have it any other way. US Oligarch hates its citizens, which is not surprising as they see themselves as a country themselves. These merry men are anti-government fundamentalist post-truthers on a false-heroic anarchist perception of romanticism, probably on a speed high – love to prop up anti-government Oligarchs who think they are beyond the law. Through payouts for corrupt judges, Trump negotiated a get-out jail card based on executive orders. This means any illegal actions supersede it by claiming it was part of that order, which co-extends to Elon.           

Back in the day, they introduced deregulation and paper speculation as a means of growth, but it would eventually produce inflation, to which control is added to the real economy, resulting in unemployment.  That would lead to low employment standards; this instability in job creation would lead to new inflation with higher interest rates. The recycling of this methodology would garner the idea that public debt as an economic tool was the answer but only positions them from hero to villain. It’s a kind of managerialism that keeps them perpetually either on the edge of recession, neither in it nor in a depression.

Managerialism that perpetuates the assumption that private sector is superior economically to the public, a false claim. Economic debt is the responsibility of the government, the treasury, and the Federal Reserve. However, it’s not relevant and merely a subset; as a whole, the government needs to raise money to pay the interest on its enormous debt. As the division gets wider between corporations and people, between the rich and the middle class, the bulk of the wealth is in the hands of corporations and the rich. Corporations and the rich had removed the burden of taxation from themselves and onto the people. People protest, so they find solutions by taking a percentage of social security, but predominantly, government managers borrow money because they don’t dare to tax the rich. The US’s biggest borrowers are China & Japan. Though it would seem this, Elon’s Coup has all the hallmarks of light-speeding the US economy to depression. It’s no surprise Trump shows his favourability towards Russia, and Russia is China’s ally.

Indeed, they are the villain, but in a post-truth age and digital expediency, they fashioned themselves a heroic model. This was only possible due to the ignorance and apathy of the people, where a slight majority are deeply anti-government in the first place. There is Nihilism in post-truth. There is no reconnection with others of the spirit.  Scepticism positions them where they are, but as absolute as fundamentalist, they are incapable of recognising important grand narratives. It’s hopeless to hope for mutuality, respect, dialogic conceptual thinking, and mutual understanding that are neither left nor right. 

.

Superpowers – Elon; Neo-Demagogue – Heir to the Rocket Man King: Often, the villains don’t see themselves as villains. They typically believe their actions, however harmful they may seem to others, are justified by their own personal motivations and immoral code. They essentially view themselves as the hero of their own story, fighting for a cause they believe in, even if it requires extreme methods.

In the 1948 operation paper clip, the US intelligence agencies executed at the end of World War 2 brought 1600 Nazi scientists and engineers over to the United States to help fight the Cold War. One particular scientist, Wernher Von Braun, helped build the V2 Rockets, which is relevant to the wealthiest man in the world. Von Braun wrote a book called Mars Project in 1952, whereupon the third of the book illustrates technical drawings of Rockets. In the book’s narrative, humanity goes to Mars; a character says we must become multi-planetary – this is sediment Musk parallel.

When they got to Mars, they realised a colony already existed there, and the colony’s leader was called “the Elon” Musk’s father, Errol Musk, stated as a child growing up in apartheid South Africa, he read these science fiction books to Elon.  Errol, being a vast Wernher Von Braun fan, named his son after the leader of the Mars colony, Elon. The colonists on Mars didn’t live on the surface but underground because the surface was too hostile – their civilisation was subterranean. We have a parallel with Elon’s Hyper-loop project, a project to create a high-speed railway between San Fransico and L.A. It was a closed loop tunnel reminiscent of the Tunnel described in the Mars Project book – to which “the Elon” was in charge.  

.

In the book, society on Mars is described as a technocracy, and “Elon is essentially a dictator, and his advisors and people around him were technocrats. An ensemble of engineers, scientists, venture Capitalists, etc., is the only one equipped to handle such challenges led by this benevolent dictator. As we already stated before, Elons maternal grandfather, Joshua Haldeman, was the leader of a pro-Hitler fascist movement in the 1930s and 1940s. And they called that movement Technocracy Inc.; they wanted a society ruled by technocrats, just like in the novel. Elon had described himself as title-King in his SEC filings for Tesla, but he ultimately sees himself as a benevolent dictator.

All these billionaires are Elon’s sphere, and Elon himself follows the philosophy of long-termism and describes effective altruism – it’s the idea that billionaires are so much more intelligent and more capable than the rest of us. And that they should make decisions for us. So they can make hard decisions for society – even if people get hurt.  His worldview seems to be shaped by science fiction fantasy written by a NAZI rocket scientist. It draws from the “dark enlightenment,” an ideology promoted by Curtis Yarvin, who argues against democracy in favour of a monarchic technocracy.

Curtis Yarvin copied the fictional theme of the totalitarian government of Orwell’s government of 1984. They perceive villains in science fiction stories or speculative fiction as heroes. The tech Oligarchs seek to emulate them because they believe how they got rich correlates to their intelligence. Though they merely inherited the position of CEO / salesman, the real inventors and engineers go unnoticed. They promote this adage of people or populace of their countries to get over the dictator baggage of history – [Examined when Elon addressed the fascist right-wing supporters in Germany]. The way to get over this baggage in history is by installing a CEO as a shadow president/leader and destroying government from within through what they call RAGE (retiring all government employees). It’s very reminiscent of what’s happening now in the US.   

The current administration of the United States is floating the concept of a North American Empire constituting Canada and Mexico as this tethered empire of a Globalist enterprise run by a pseudo-science version of the divine right of kings. Elon has set himself up for this ever since he was a child fascinated by the concept of being a dictator king illustrated by a fictional narrative a Rocket scientist wrote.  

.

Silicon Valley’s collective ideology is libertarian and has now turned authoritarian as they believe democracy is obsolete and that they are living in post-constitutional America. Where there is a motivation to initiate or motivate the populace for a Technocratic Feudal Monarch, they write about seizure control of technology and computers and financial payments as the essence of moving one form of government to another. However, the ideologue of modern science has become split as one side overreaches to scientism myth-making, and the other a snail pace of rationalism. As a whole, science is not responsible for ethical or political frameworks..

A Monarch system does not allow morality and common sense to be guided by reason; ironically, these merits make a strong King. The science’s overreach is the illusion of [technological] evolution when it’s equal in engineering as a toymaker creating robot dogs. Reason had created notions of applied data to failed constructions as it was merely an elaborate structure over falsehood. It also allowed us to host events for new authoritarian leaders. Later, we referred to them as absolute dictators, as they aimed to produce examples of false responsible democracy. This is our western inheritance, while the rest of the world struggles with other problems caused by different forces. Despite that, we are still connected, and we develop policies that consider those links. Their hopes for a Monarch still need to analyse itself or reform its society against the rest of the world, which will never give up its civilisation through democracy.

When Curtis Yarvin was asked why he believed FDR was a dictator? He replied: FDR ran the New Deal like a start-up. FDR disapproved of one of the secretary’s lists of projects in the Oval Office, and later, they wrote in their journal FDR ran the Oval Office like a CEO. Anecdotes are not a good reason to suggest FDR was a dictator; they are mere indications that his management method was cooperative. These rich tech nerds view reality within tech and power as drastically different from how the government is run. It is strange how utilitarianism is used as a reason, like technological feudalism, which is different from feudalism because the common ground is technocracy. Cynicism, ambition, rhetoric, and worship of power were characteristics commonly found in the courts of the eighteenth century. This is what the modern elites want to live by; it’s just further propelled by tech oligarchs who can make it realised.       

Elected or non-elected elites who disregard the public cooperate with established democratic systems while neglecting the contributions of the populace and failing to recognise a shared moral code. They rely on heroic appeals, contractual arguments, and administrative methods. When engaging with the public, they find it easier to appeal to the lowest common denominator within each individual. This reinforces their contempt for the public, as they assume people can do nothing better. They overlook that the public, like its individual members, is capable of outstanding achievements and significant failures. Citizens are often limited by their time and knowledge; they are busy with jobs and families and may hesitate to go beyond their areas of expertise. Despite this, the public maintains a strong trust in their elites, believing that these leaders have been trained and selected to usher in an age of reason. Unfortunately, the elites often reward that trust with a betrayal of those they are meant to serve.

Superpowers – Elon; Neo-Demagogue – Rocket to the Eye of Providence is not a Seat in Heaven: It took four and half centuries to break the eighteenth century’s power of divine revelation, only to replace it with divine revelations of reason. They are genuinely godless in a sense; they are evolutional, the ascent through transformation – while symbolically and mythically enamoured with angelic worship of the watchers types – who gifted them with technology. They are deeply technocratic – reinforced by A.I adaptive behaviours, basically worshipping numbers in a vortex or an abyss. It’s lullian number magic – superseded by A.I number generators; they worship an A.I god. So, we are back trying to break away from divine revelation written in code, but this time, it has firmly placed itself in rational modes of technology and knowledge. Can mystery be reasoned with?

Post-constitutional America up against a post-truth populace who are broadly patriotic does not seem to align but does so in their shared ignorance. And it’s in ignorance, not postmodernism, that sways people to deny or have the option of referring to truth. Postmodernism has become a scapegoat regarding that sensibility; in that regard, postmodernism is closer to analysing post-truth than the espousal of post-truth. It’s difficult to understand that postmodernism is not interested in eradicating the distinction between truth and lies – or even the abolition of the topic of truth from the realms of philosophy. When discussing truth in a postmodern lens, truth becomes this transient object, always grasping at it throughout time. In its history, it displaces questions of time with questions of truth – a part of that history is deconstruction. As a result, Derrida conjured issues that were more relevant to higher education.        

Lyotard recognised a change of tense in cultural productions, and he called it “future anterior”, a notion of looking forward or forward-lookingness. It was about being concerned or exercising things to come or what a futurist monstrosity would be ushered in. Humankind grew out of his self-interest and built rockets and satellite technology with a burning desire to answer whether there was a primeval space god. Technology has a bad habit of assuming we matured out of self-structure, and only scepticism can reassure us that moon landings were studio-made. Hyperreal space is mythology where Elite’s relationship with the future is fundamental, and the truth is secondary. We never went to the moon, and we will never go to Mars, and Elon’s hope for a future in which space travel is as common as a trip downtown in your car will never be realised. It is a fictional detachment of self-interest of childhood imaginations, though that is also the selling point of NASA.         

What had been conceived as hyperreal polar shifts may indeed be magnetic upheavals together with a combination of the north [centre-pole] high mountain’s plasma and volcano, creating a bubble shield of magnetic particles that will overflow and soon need to be released like a corkscrew. In the past, Genesis mythology says it blew a hole in the sky. A sky reminiscent of concentric circles like an eye, and in it’s this momentary opening to which you find the technocratic elite’s true scope – is to pierce through that eye’s opening. Why? They believe they can buy their way into heaven, as they intuitively know such a place is not for them, so they plan to immortalise their souls. They make deals with fallen entities [fallen angelic beings] so the entities can once again be among the stars. As a result, they are gifted with power, technology and the promise of immortality.

This claim does not fall under the jurisdiction of truth, nor is it post-truth, either considering it’s an analysis or even postmodern since it has a speculation of myth towards it, ever pushing the absurdity of a heliocentric grand narrative. Derrida’s idea imparts that news, fake news, truth, post-truth, conspiracy theory, conspiracy truth, mysticism, synchronicities, journalism, etc., all have a future orientation, producing the event that purports to record it. Somehow, the achievement of an event makes it happen. It’s the living world answering back at you. It gives it a future orientation; regarding post-truth, news bears a relationship with the future, and that news itself changed its tense [future anterior]. It does not represent events that have occurred in the past; it represents events still to come. Derrida’s deconstructive move is to take an opposition but to relocate that opposition inside one of its terms; this was the only challenge to the concept of truth. The distinction between truth and lies emerges from the concept of the lie. The idea of post-truth suggests that truth must be a lie – if post-truth can be understood, the separation of truth and lies is necessary to defend the truth. Relocate heliocentrism back to its centre. Here, you can find the distinction between truth and lie inside the concept of the lie. 

What is normal behaviour regarding our humanness if we can’t uncover its truth? Post-truthers and the alt-right have taken it to the extent that it’s abnormal and exclusionary. Romanticism and scepticism are no longer imbued towards conspiracy theory and ufology but are instead galvanised to a 4chan love child of fascistic ideologues. Capitalism plays a part also plays a part in their despair, but dam if they care as culture wars instil like dispensary for their deep-seated hate. To break them from 40 years of demoralisation is by its method of scepticism and reason, and to have empiricism overshadow their ideologies that get passed down to the younger generation – enthralled by their logic of arbitrary power and superstition of knowledge. This is difficult as the function of argument is co-opted into a virtual/digital dictatorship of terminology. We have to rummage through the garbage to get to the pearl of knowledge, reach its basic foundations, and rediscover ourselves by questioning it – and maybe it would resonate with those people as well.

Knowing all too well, the spilt will always be there, but the truth doesn’t have to be all-encompassing. Take Astrology; star constellations signifying gods and myths embedded in animal imageries have been around since the dawn of civilisation. Those patterns in the stars are made to have allegories; it doesn’t mean we recognise them as literal – it doesn’t mean it’s useless either. It became a utility that allowed navigation for ships that sailed to sea. As a metaphor, it works, and truth becomes less of a key principle – the function has the meaning of truth than what rational truth might strive for.       

.

.

.

Mystics & Artist-Prophets:

.

---

.

Superpowers – Economic Game of Thrones: So, in the last post, we discussed the failures of instrumental reason, or rather, it does not exist, and also discussed utilitarianism being used as reason will fail. Such causes can have a split in reason, to which Agrippa’s method helps us or rather engenders Kant & Baudrillard’s observation of simultaneously accepting both rational and irrational. Agrippa came to reconcile his split in reason with the Church alongside a proto-protestant interest in magic (mystical faiths). That magic would be the method by which one reconciles oneself with God. A view that McKenna shares, though, his idea is about the redemption of the world through magic.

This suggests that certain Western civilisations are fundamentally corrupt, with goodness buried beneath these corrupt layers. Our flawed system, the metaphorical Egregore, is destined to collapse, repeating the cycle experienced by other civilisations that have risen and fallen throughout history. In this rational framework, the lifeblood of our system is our economy. The current U.S. Empire is in decline; it integrated the Northeast, the Midwest, and the Southern states, which resolved the issue of slavery with its abolition during the late British Empire period. The growth of capitalism followed the emancipation of enslaved individuals, who were never compensated for the years they were treated as property. With no competitors, capitalism accumulated vast wealth. However, over a century of exceptional growth, signs of trouble emerged. For the past forty years, wealth redistribution has primarily benefited the privileged elite, facilitated by various methods, including changes to tax laws that favour the wealthy.

The distinction between capital and labour had never been more defined due to stagnant wage distribution, meaning any wage increase would have no bearing if the cost of products also increased. The last real wage increase stopped in the 70s, and because of a lack of real wages, banks started handing out loans and credit cards, creating a country that was in debt. It was never a solution. As productivity grew, wages remained flat. In this apparent inequality, they produced crisis/hoax scenarios that further propelled people into dystopia: the coronavirus, rising inflation and interest rates.

A strange parallel is unfolding, resembling the economic despair that contributed to the rise of fascist ideology at the end of World War I. The German working class, believing they were building a new Empire, experienced dissolution after their defeat. This led to rampant inflation in Germany, followed by a severe depression. In this atmosphere of collective despair, they rallied behind a failed artist who transformed himself into a charismatic speaker, ultimately paving the way for fascism and Nazism. Similarly, in the contemporary United States, issues such as healthcare, wages, homelessness, and racism create a landscape that mirrors the economic disparity of the past. In this climate, demagogues have emerged, positioning themselves as leaders promising salvation. When corporatism aligns closely with the government’s self-interest, it can lead to totalitarianism, where elections, the Senate, and public debates become increasingly detached from genuine populism, devolving into false populism and, eventually, empire.

As empires decline, they often take their allies down with them. In Australia, despite having a robust universal health care system, the government strongly encourages the adoption of private insurance. The government even subsidizes insurance companies by billions of dollars, based on the rationale that it reduces the burden on the public system. This means taxpayers effectively fund subsidies that benefit those with private health coverage, while uninsured individuals continue to pay taxes without any benefits. Data shows that private insurance does not alleviate the pressure on hospitals, especially regarding reducing waiting lists. It contributes to inequality and harms public health systems, diverting resources from public care to private enterprises. While healthcare corporations and CEOS profit from these policies, reducing surplus means even higher profits can be achieved. This policy was implemented by a short, conservative prime minister who held office for 11 years. His tenure is characterised by poor decisions and unwise policies squandering Australia’s wealth.

The current US tactics are pretty much the playbook of this odious Australian politician, though less extreme in their execution. Nevertheless, this little [Napoleon Complex] guy originated that template tactic. He introduced the Border Protection Bill; he also aligned with Bush on the supposed war on terror post-September 11, against UN approval. As is the case, the sovereignty of Australian waters was merely a PR opportunity for future elections. Illegals on boats seeking asylum inland were victims of conjured fake news about babies being thrown overboard for political points against the morals of immigrants on board. This was a proto-culture war, which spurred debate among the Australian populace. This guy introduced border control, GST taxes, work choices, citizenship tests, gun-banning laws, < and the Workplace Relations Act, which reduced union control and Negative Gearing in real estate. Negative gearing created highly inflated housing prices, which no normal young people in the future can afford. And, of course, Australian conservatives blame it on immigration rather than this stupid policy that only empowered landowners and overseas owners to monopolise the housing markets. He balanced social leftist concerns with a centre-right earnestness that allowed him to stay in power for so long.

Australia’s abundant reserves of coal and other mineral resources were outsourced to the Chinese government in 2000. By 2012, this arrangement had generated $188 billion solely from gas exports. Former Prime Minister John Howard squandered these funds by failing to invest in future wealth through research and development, education, and renewable energy. Instead, he used the revenue to implement tax cuts, such as raising the corporate tax rate by six percentage points and reducing the income tax rate at the end of his tenure. As a result, many are still questioning what happened to $1.3 trillion of Australian wealth. Furthermore, most mining companies operating in Australia are foreign entities, and three-quarters of their profits are sent abroad rather than reinvested in the Australian economy.

International currency has always been measured against the US dollar; this is no longer true as the Chinese dollar has become as stable as gold. Countries define themselves in their GDP, and the currency of the People’s Republic of China shows all the signs of a rising empire against a declining one in the US. The US’s conflict against Russia is just for propaganda, as its real competitor is its ally, China; throughout the years, it has orchestrated warfare. Ukraine is a victim country between economic powerhouses that are playing economic games of thrones. Who wants to weaken the ally of China, “Russia”

Although they are called the CCP, China’s wealth has been built on socialism. Unlike other countries, they did not achieve their wealth through invasions or strategically placing military bases worldwide. Instead, they welcomed and promoted capitalist enterprises within China. The wealth generated here is distributed between the private sector and the state, unlike the United States, where wealth has become increasingly concentrated in private and corporate hands. In the US, government and taxpayer wealth have often been funnelled to the already affluent, while China maintains a balance between private and state ownership. Hong Kong emerged as a hub for Western trade, influencing the rest of China’s economic development.

To the detriment of the American people, Neoconservatives have narrowed the perception of China and communism to a single point in Stalin’s history, turning it into a symbolic evil bogeyman. Despite having a strong economy and a rich history marked by imperial rule and internal conflicts, including wars with the Mongols, China is aware of the empire’s failures. It finds itself in uncharted territory as it moves forward, yet it still prefers its cultural roots. From a Western perspective, China may not seem like an ideal place to live. However, aspects of its system could inform a robust social wing of Western democracy, particularly socialism. This understanding might represent the best possible approach to engaging with China.

Australia, having no backbone when it comes to foreign relations with the US, is stuck appeasing a Narcissistic big brother [U.S.] and also keeping equal footing with its most significant economic trade partner, China. Corporate oligarchies, taking the playbook of John Howard, blame immigration for the US’s despair; however, the result of a capitalist economy of 330 million people, that an undocumented 10 million of the poorest people in the US is the cause of their difficulties, is stupid. The US is a very racist country, made evident by slavery, the Klan & secret cult ties, conservatism and an uneducated right-wing populace that is all willing to believe this claptrap. Farmers left with no workers still voted for Trump on blind faith that people in power and governance are considering their concerns. Here lies the fundamental problem of blind faith and stupidity.

It’s a concern, and as such, all demoralised persons should slowly be educated away from decades of right-wing propaganda because such a cure is possible through forms of disenchantment. It starts by pointing out the robber barons’ philosophy that they are anarcho-capitalists for you in the adage “pull yourself up by the bootstraps” with no support for the government, no social safety net, you either sink or swim. However, for them, it’s about self-interest and profit that includes government support in corporate welfare, socialism for the rich and rugged individualism and capitalism for the poor. They get subsidies, tax cuts, corporate welfare checks and government contracts. Low-income people must find their way, exemplified further by denouncing social security altogether but keeping corporate welfare flowing. They want grants from the government in corporate welfare, while the rest of the people get none, yet the people pay the taxes that these guys would take from corporate welfare [absolute lunacy].

In our previous discussion, we explored how utilitarianism is not a form of reasoning and how problems arise when utilitarianism is allowed to dominate in specific areas, such as the economy. This approach demonises, marginalises, and undermines non-utilitarian perspectives. Utility, unlike true thought or argument, often lacks depth. A billionaire named Marc Andreessen, who resembles a loathsome and stuttering version of Lex Luthor, exemplifies this by distorting truth and facts, as well as rewriting history to align with the utilitarian rationale that oligarchs use in pursuit of their dehumanising goals. For instance, he once claimed that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was “de-banking” people when, in reality, the Bureau was working to protect individuals from being de-banked. He also asserts that the American people are living under a form of FDR’s monarchy, even 80 years after FDR’s time, suggesting that FDR was merely replacing the DuPont monarchy. He hints at what he and his fellow oligarchs desire in his rhetoric: a demagogue, a malefactor of great wealth akin to Trump, to serve as their FDR-like placeholder King for a supposed fictional monarch.

The author characterises the Republic as a monarchy without a leader, explicitly referencing Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR), and argues that this is a misleading and fictional representation. The modern nation-state was created to replace monarchy and medieval systems, requiring a new framework to unify society differently. It was designed as “a rational, universally applicable code,” and subsequent laws have built upon this foundational concept of centralised administration. However, an important aspect that has been overlooked is the role of reason, mainly as programs have developed without a solid methodology, as seen in the case of neoliberalism.

He attempts to use history as a tool, portraying FDR as a type of King. In this view, this royal framework must encapsulate our capacity for reason. Consequently, all other human qualities are reduced to the title of King. This is a flawed interpretation, as the federal government’s role should be re-evaluated with every new leader; that is fundamental to the functioning of democracy. His argument is disingenuous because it implicitly advocates for a monarchical system without explicitly saying so. He suggests that we already live under such a system, lacking only FDR, and posits that the solution is to install a demagogic, malevolent King disguised as a President. These notions reflect a form of instrumental reasoning that dehumanises citizens and justifies treasury looting while undermining social security.

There have always been billionaires who had sway in government behind the scenes, and due to our modern apocalyptic reality, shared knowledge, and conspiracy theories, we can put faces to these billionaires. Conspiracy theory, unfortunately, is collectively attached to the right-wing worldview, c’est la vie. However, Agrippa, Kant and Baudrillard have implied one way or another that ideas, thoughts, opinions, and points of view don’t have to be dialectically polarised or pigeonhole one way, meaning one could be a leftist and have a clear understanding of conspiracy theory and reason.  

Superpowers – Gaia versus Egregore; [System versus Entities]: The failed assassin of Trump reassessed their strategy, shifting to Plan B: to become the salesman of a dismantled American Empire. This plan involves withdrawing from the world as a competitor, a course of action dictated by economic inevitability. The underlying reasoning highlighted in statements like “Drill Baby Drill” serves to mislead the public about the true intentions behind these policies, which are ultimately oriented towards failure. The narrative suggests that increased drilling will lead to more incredible wealth for Americans; however, the reality is that the United States cannot effectively compete in an OPEC-dominated oil market. Even if US production reaches a minimum price of $40 per barrel, OPEC can still profit by selling at $10 less. OPEC can dismantle the US oil sector whenever it chooses, but refrains from doing so to maintain price stability. Opting for competition in the hope that OPEC will reduce its prices is risky; OPEC could just as easily raise its prices, which would devastate the US oil industry, leading to plant closures and investor withdrawals. Many private sector billionaires—some of whom now hold positions in the US cabinet—are no longer invested in the success of the American economy, as their interests are global rather than national. This shift means they could drive the US energy sector into bankruptcy sooner rather than later, allowing them to acquire assets at a fraction of their worth.

Trump & Elon are puppets for OC GFC controllers of Global Financialised Capital – essentially the world’s superpower. For a while, the military-industrial complex, which included the navy and military agencies in conjunction with independent government agencies, had more capital than a termite like Elon could ever gain, and it influenced the policy of the US. It was a surprise when a new power emerged from the den of darkness, flexing its weight, the GFC. The MIC couldn’t account for trillions of dollars lost to defence sectors alongside conflicts, wars, corruption, and fraud that had accumulated. As a result, systemic shifts in the economy diversified from weapons of mass destruction to Digital & international platforms. China holds all the market value, like rare earth materials, to produce computers and circuit boards. The rhetoric of MAGA boasting about invasions and power between Russia, China and the US is propaganda when there is a symbiosis of economy at hand.

The GFC shapes economic power and influences politics, and most of the Tech giants’ wealth comes from the GFC. Financialisation is fake money that integrates itself with pharma, healthcare, construction, mining and other sub-categories – driven by a-national groups or Oligarchs that corral together as diverse business interests for asset management firms like BlackRock, StateStreet and Vanguard. Ultimately, work on global interest, not just one country or company. They control trillions of dollars alongside being connected to sovereign wealth funds worldwide that give them access to trillions more. This is why it’s odd that robber baron oligarchs want to loot the government treasury, as it has restrictions; it’s illegal.

The populace will ultimately suffer the consequences of the actions taken by their elites. The fall was going to happen, and it didn’t matter who was in the President’s role; Kamala and the Democrats would have slowed down the process, but ultimately, they were riding the tail end of this degradation and isolation of the empire. Populism, culture, and conspiracy theory without reason allowed a Western predatory [criminal class] capitalism to dictate the livelihoods of US citizens. Alongside culture and the civilisational peculiarities of the West, there is a symbiotic relationship and response to capitalism because of who they are. [What/who is the American populace?]. They put themselves on the chopping block, despite its inevitability considering the rise and fall of the empire.

Why aren’t they angry or in protest? Their ignorance and mistakes deflate half the populace who put a demagogue in power; furthermore, in their isolationism, they are apathetic. They agree with Trump as cults agree with their Guru. Even if it is towards a fascist movement, conspiracy theories without reason create echo chambers of sociopaths. It emboldens their inherited racism and frustrates and angers their inner demons towards their closeted homosexuality and fearfulness of transsexualism. The decline had to happen. It was inevitable, a fact agreed upon by fence sitters like Chris Hedges, who voted for the other instead of Harris or Trump. Who describes Harris as an inadequate leader and Trump as a symptom of more profound disillusionment with politics, where they would rather vote for despair and anguish [a broken system] rather than any politics that builds something? Neoliberalism had alienated right-wing populists from government and civic engagement.

There is no longer a true leftist reality; there is only a right-wing and extreme-right-wing political base. The Clinton era distanced itself from traditional leftist positions and adopted a guise of Republicanism, leading the Republican Party to adopt far-right views. This shift has been further transformed by the rise of right-wing fundamentalism and cultism, which Trump later capitalised on. As a result, the establishment wing of the Republican Party merged with that of the Democratic Party. Many may not want to acknowledge it, but oligarchs have seized power at all levels, and what we are witnessing is merely a façade of democracy. The conflict is less about Democrats versus Republicans (or left versus right) and more about a battle between corporations and oligarchs. Corporatists seek stability and decorum within a democratic framework, while oligarchs thrive on chaos, aiming to dismantle the administrative state for a more raw form of capitalism through privatisation.

As much as MAGA and Republicans are responsible for this decline in the West [by systemically changing nationalism into a neo-fascist movement] – here, it’s very necessary to be divisive because there is a clear difference between a leftist and democrat, but is both tunnelled left and does not exclude them from the same indoctrination and participation in the deception and deflection of that system. A system which we describe as the Egregore, a living system that implies we have no control over – is this just esoteric symbolic jargon or truths behaving as a piecemeal systemic illustration of them? ‘Yes, ’ GFC seems like a Titan compared to our capacity. The trick is to collectivise inside the rational system that is now in place and link the great truths and the building block illustrations. This can only be done if we have faith in the system to which our individuality with the collective, not ‘human capital’ [territory], belongs. The system is our rational backbone. The true system of nature is the concrete manifestation of the rational godhead, not a system built on numbers, GDP & corporate companies, and finance groups. We are rational because that natural system is, while utilitarianism and specialisation have roles as an organising principle, they undermine lateral thought and questioning.

An example of instrumental divisiveness can be observed with DOGE, which harbours the misleading belief that it can replace established roles through its particular specialisation, despite those roles having already been mapped out. Proponents believed they could circumvent important checks and balances by promoting a false notion of expertise and responsibility, inevitably leading to layers of misguided assumptions. Their utilitarianism, presented as a methodological rationale, ultimately undermines the system’s wealth or diverts money into their pockets. Furthermore, ideas must guide public policy to succeed, and this principle also applies to evolutionary organisms.

Not all of the populace is guilty of creating a class of national oligarchical elites whose private profit interests are no longer connected to the equilibrium nature of our system. Not all of the populace shares in the creation of a psychopathic class of predators, but are merely guilty of ignorance and limited knowledge, where, for the most part, knowledge is concentrated at an elementary/primary level of education rather than the challenges of higher learning. At the same time, the rationality of universities inspires power rather than education. As a result, this new fascist movement that gestated from the Klan, which swapped out swastikas for the cross and the mass recitations of the Pledge of Allegiance, grounded in white supremacy, emerged on a national level. A bubble of ideology to which Trump exploited as he has none, the result of which has become anti-government fundamentalism and conspiracy theory without reason. However, they are all too willing to go along with having a > Tech- utopian, feudalist, and networked state future.

Superpowers – Elon; Neo-Demagogue; Power over Depredation of Guilt: Jean-Paul Sartre’s non-fiction work, “Saint Genet: Homosexuality,” presents the story of a character named Jean Genet in a way that resembles a novel. It describes a moment when a 10-year-old boy named Jean is caught by his adoptive parents while trying to take a cookie from a jar. In that instant, he’s accused of stealing, this marks a turning point for him. He stops being just a boy, someone with a clean slate and endless potential, and instead becomes defined as “Jean Genet.” But who is Jean Genet? At no point does the entire town truly understand who he is—a question that remains fundamental even in adulthood, let alone for a child. Jean is made to feel fear and shame, branded by the community as a “thief.” He recalls this period of his life as if it only lasted an instant, yet it left a lasting impact on his identity.

Unaware like a pre-lapsarian Adam free in his imaginative consciousness is shot back to earth in an instant awakening. Ignorant of the world, he can only acknowledge and agree with his actions. He reveals that he is a thief and pleads guilty, overwhelmed by an undeniable truth: he stole something and is indeed a thief. The boy, Genet, reflects on his situation and sees no way out. He desires to steal; what he did was theft, so he is a thief. A voice in his head—his intuition—protests loudly, but he refuses to acknowledge it. The act itself and the facts of the incident silence this internal protest. As an adult, he recalls the moment he decided to steal something, an act undertaken without thought, conceived and executed in the hidden, secretive space where he often retreats. This decision has become an objective reality, and it is in this transition that the course of his life will be determined.

Genet has become a mythical metamorphosis of a child rejected by his mother(s) – a mother who, without forethought, created a demiurge that prevails in Genet’s action that in his action was without forethought, like the demiurge driven from the Pleroma into the lowest planes. It is then refracted onto Adam, driven from Paradise Lost, and Genet is exiled from his childhood, guilty and isolated, which Sartre emphasises as “I” for isolated, separate, in short, like the outsider. He had been miscategorised among those with ego dysfunction, principles of the souls, which they lack as they produce the slightest movement of the soul. His adoptive parents have given him the mark of guilt/Cain/beast – where once he lived in peace with himself, where desire was made simple and clear; in the adage “what is mine is yours”, Genet, not knowing the axiom, felt it intuitively. Their transparency seems deceptive; they were designed with a false bottom. Little Genet is a thief; eternity is thrust upon him; he is a thief from birth and onto death. No recourse is made to God in this eternity; as magical conception of the world, nature and freedom are the same. He is free because he is condemned. This label will follow him for the rest of his life.

This label has its origins in the Calvinist idea of predestination, which accords the sinner full responsibility for evil while denying him any possibility of doing Good. It is a fundamental perversion of freedom, a constant inclination to do wrong, a sort of reversal of grace, and a weighting of free will that makes it always descend to the lowest level.

You can see such examples when Elon, the anti-mystic neo-demagogue, emboldens his platform-X, a century-old racist pseudo-science spreading misinformation about racial minorities’ intelligence and physiology as biologically inferior to white people. The appearance of instrumental reason embodies false empiricism where they mimic Hackle’s fake charts, graphs and illustrations of biological evolution.

As we are not dumb Trump voters, correlation does not equal causation. Actual scientists have stated that the fundamental concept of race has no basis in biology. The evolutionary model of genetic diversity is completely different from this social model of distinct isolated racial groups. Racial differences are flawed views of genetic variation, which do not follow the kind of racial distinction. This racist pseudo-science places itself like a virus into intuitions like the DEI – where the motivation was a way to respond to woke ideals of race/sex nepotism. Such a case can be examined where Harris got a double hit of pseudo-race science but also was in her position because of that. Her resume for competence overextends her coalition or opposition by miles, but not enough to make her stand out; she is a mere clone of Biden or the Obama administration. There is a fine balance in the divisiveness. Although it may not be necessary – as it is not the outcome of rationality but an ideological approach towards reason, counterbalanced by other qualities, reason is saved from this weakness and is drawn towards its strength.

Furthermore, they may be hiding their own insecurities about their inferior idea about themselves and so overcompensate in fiction. Other factors like blood have equal importance and focus on DNA and its Codons, as well as melanin; these are the factors with which supernatural powers can resonate. The traits of fair skin [that lack melanin], blue eyes, and RH-negative blood are components that want to embed themselves into fiction, notably the Vril kind, to appear less inferior. These were some of the determining factors in concluding a superior race, and this component was used [at least on the surface] as a reason for a war with the world based on race.

Symbology is powerful because it’s part of magic, and Elon the Neo-Demagogue [the Algo – Algorithm, Demon Star resonator] decided [or MK U-Altered to do so] that he would give a Nazi salute two times in his inauguration speech. There is no mistake to be had; it was a Nazi salute [symbol] – he is found guilty, and his hand was in the cookie jar. He is guilty as Genet is perceived guilty, unlike Genet; however, he is a full adult with awareness and is known or perceived to be the richest man on earth. He can deny his accusers while denying his guilt and revealing the evil present all around them. Their extreme actions forced this evil to be consumed alongside the good. In a state of indifference and despair, he can challenge the principles of public morality, invoking either a Nietzschean philosophy or anarchist ethics. They denied the existence of universal values and opted instead to acknowledge only the survival of the fittest or the law of the jungle.

Genet is just a child, lacking the motivation and means to defend himself against accusations. To him, adults seem god-like, and their authority has tainted his morality to the point where it feels inherent to his being. In this situation, he finds himself both accused and judged. We witness a virtuous rage being employed as a means of reasoning, ultimately devising a future devoid of cohesion and hope, resulting in a pervasive hopelessness. This manipulation, used by Elon as a symbolic tool, seems designed to ritualise his power and maintain his untouchability. Genet is depicted as a monster, and his future is seemingly predetermined, such as imprisonment or a penal colony. Before being labelled a monster, Genet existed in a ‘sweet confusion,’ unaware of his identity. Now, as he becomes conscious of himself, he faces the harsh reality that he is viewed as a monster.

Genet has become an abused child, and the rape is through people’s gazes of guilt. It had penetrated him and transformed him forever into an object. The hand in the cookie jar is the crisis; the condemnation and guilt afterwards was the rape. Sartre says: “In our moral consciousness, a true rape can become unjust, yet inescapable condemnation; and, conversely, a condemnation can be experienced as rape. Both transform the guilty person, and he feels this objectification in his heart as a feeling of shame and in his sexual being as a subjection of coitus. From now on, Genet is deflowered; an iron grasp has made a woman of him; all that remains is for him to get used to being” [– Sartre]. After which, he would become a vestal of homosexuality.    

Genet is portrayed as a monster, while in truth; Monsters have made Genet what he is. Before he can determine his sexual determinancy, Genet reacted to his condemnation by a general ethical inversion. He was turned inside out, sent back to nothingness; it was nothingness alone he wished to belong, or the impossible. The undesired, he was not born of a man, but of some incubus. – Sartre

Elon has the power to initiate a fascist symbolic gesture [where, for some countries, it is illegal to do so, including Australia] because his position allows him to do so. Moreover, he is an inversion of Genet; power has made him free from morality, and the focus of guilt will slide off him like water on a duck’s back. He is the one doing the raping, and you cannot grow morality inside someone with narcissism, someone with an inflated and fragile ego. Elon’s grandparents are known sympathisers of the Nazi party in Germany, and his associations were known to be part of the Apartheid of South Africa.  

His act had made monsters of everyone and made all his sycophants “gay”, all those anti-woke  right-wing podcasters and mainstream media journalists who overtly claim that the gesture is merely “my heart goes towards you.” Not in gay in a traditional sense, but guilt by association, flying monkies of Elon’s guilt and shame, he had made them his bitches [his object] as they are without their integrity. As they are not afforded the same power, they will face the full force of the law and the same condemnation Genet got to anyone who feels that they can copy this abhorrent action.

.

.

.

Mystics & Artist-Prophets:

.

---

.

Superpowers – Instrumental Reasoning as an Idea can Fail; the Cornelius Agrippa Effect: The wars of religion, the Reformation, and the Counter-Reformation played a more chaotic role in history than the Enlightenment period. Establishing the Enlightenment required a secular governance model that avoided the religiosity that was prevalent in the past. This was followed by the Industrial Revolution, which brought about significant advancements in science and technology. During this time, a movement in Germany emerged where Protestant theology began to deconstruct or eliminate the mysterious aspects of the Christian faith, such as miracles, virgin births, and resurrection, in favour of a Unitarian approach grounded in ethics and rational thought. In contrast, a fundamentalist movement also arose when communism became increasingly dominant. Corporate industries at that time utilised fundamentalism as a rival ideology but would later shift their stance to support Fascism and Nazism.   

The deconstruction of Protestant Christianity allowed the same Unitarian approach [dismantling democracy] on Instrumental reasoning, such as the war on terror that the Bush administration started and would further lead us into the future. This can now be seen in the Trump administration. The whole Apex of the Bush Administration was about a unitary executive theory – giving the presidency a Trump card to act like a King and less a public servant.  

The elimination of the concept of Spirit in religion at that time led many to believe that science and scientism could solve every problem and answer every question under the sun. However, science and scientism only created a new set of problems. As this rational, atheistic scientific movement gained traction, religion became less appealing. In contrast to modernity, this new atheist movement has largely disappeared. What remains are only the demoralized individuals who advocate for perceived everyday rational experiences, such as satellization. This shift has vacated a space where one might assume that occultism—such as witchcraft and paganism—would take over. However, that is not the case; occultism serves as a utility for the state and a small population segment. This small segment exists because the majority still adhere to Galileo’s cosmology. While the new atheist movement may be dead, its remnants linger, particularly in how we perceive our cosmology.

What replaced it is a demented version of the Christian religion where one nationalist exists as deeply Nazi racist. At the same time, the other is very pro-Zionist – leaving the rest of traditional Christians confused. Where is the normalcy in this paradox? You could argue that beneath this crude sense of identity lies a misguided belief that a country can achieve economic success through ironic and unpatriotic methods, such as deportation, particularly in a nation built on immigration. Taking on the rights of citizenship to its absolute has a backward effect where the illusion of investment towards actual citizens cannot be equalled through the irrational demands of society. The profits would be greater with social development towards citizenships and flexibility towards illegals.     

Atheism, specifically scientific atheism, was to substitute religious faith, which was a key feature of communist ideology. I don’t see how that’s possible since churches are tax-exempt. Perhaps by regulating the market, the regime can control the supply of religion through charitable donations. One would have to consider whether those donations were given to any techno-fascist movements as evidence of partnership; otherwise, it remains mere conjecture. Ironically, the most significant contributions they receive come from the government through socialist programs, even though they view the government as adversarial. This situation is similar to crypto-fascist capitalists, who can monopolise grants while simultaneously criticising the same organisations. There are historical examples where economic models are not solely tied to instrumentalism, and those tend to endure longer. Take, for example, German industrialist Robert Bosch, who, in 1906, introduced the eight-hour workday and paid vacations for his workers. His industries continue to thrive to this day.

The development of transhumanism, robotics, and artificial intelligence may play on the same cosmology: a utopia exists beyond Earth. As it’s examined in transhumanism, a digital holographic paradise which in essence makes it religious and pagan, whether it’s communist is questionable. Scientism and (nu)new-atheism are pagan and have a salvation myth to them, i.e. “we shall be gods.” The compatibility of paganism and communism would be a pressing concern for the world more than arguing about whether or not the dictatorship of the proletariat is compatible with believing that the fairies living in your garden are at all relevant to anything. If it is sorcery, then that’s a different matter. It would be a better fit, considering the sorcerer wants personal power instead of the artist.

Trying to present paganism towards a purely socio-economic [communism] model falls flat when the concern is more nature-based, such as the identification of the ascent of transformation equally in the transformation in evolution. The pursuit of power and immortality highlights an evolutionary transformation, but it is more closely associated with the darker aspects of occult magic. A modern example of the divide surrounding sceptical models can be seen in the “zeitgeist” film. The Pagan Salvation mythos and the Christ Salvation mythos share similarities in their connections to astro-theology. However, they primarily address the solstice as a myth related to seasonal deities. This is just one aspect among many astrological myths that can be observed in the night sky. A key distinction between the legacy of Jesus and that of devotees of Horus and other religions is that the latter never regarded their deities as historical figures or their sacred stories as factual, as Christians do. Additionally, there is no solid evidence to support the existence of a historical Jesus. Gnostic Christians, for instance, believe that Jesus was not the son of God (Jehovah) but rather the son of Wisdom. 

This is a split in scepticism relevant to our modernity, an apocalyptic time where Christian fundamentalism still champions fascism. The heart of individualism stands as the heart of irrational instrumentalism. It is an inclusive ideal with walls around it where they hold Pure Reason unbroken. This is their godhead. It’s not Jesus. In the cloak of practical reasons and gas-lighting, thinking they live a responsible life. However, what follows are delusions: that they can exist outside the whole – that’s because reason, when deformed into instrumental dictum, seems quite naturally to slip from complexity to a linear mode.      

The methodology of logic that proclaims the virtue of technical innovation examined in adaptive behavioural (AI) intelligence waking up the demon head Algol (algorithm) is no more complex or breathtaking than medieval Lullian mystics who believed by developing a system of calculations whereby one could calculate your way to truth and godhood. A renascence version of information theory, and so there was a backlash because it undermines faith –there is no need for it if you can calculate your way into divinity. On the other hand, they had no problems with art’s connection to divinity and godhood.

Cornelius Agrippa appeared in the scene, mindful of the qualities of art and magic as an alchemical base, and proclaimed that “magic” would be how one can reconcile oneself with God. Agrippa is a Catholic sceptic philosopher who tackled his split in reason regarding balancing an esoteric understanding versus his fondness for nominalism. This induced scepticism, followed by an interest in proto-Protestantism and humanism. He was essentially at the centre of interesting philosophical points, which positioned him to make a breakthrough in sceptical philosophy. Agrippa was part of a secret society that backed his alchemical research; at this time, he was coming to grips with being a pious Catholic and coming to terms with the direct reconciliation with God via Protestant interest and magic. This is a perplexing position, considering the Church offered reconciliation through the Church’s reform and Sacrament. He believes it would be magic as a mechanism by which you reconcile the fallen souls directly with God. If it can be done by magic, you don’t need the Church. This is the dilemma he couldn’t reconcile his magical theorising and his position with the Church. So, Agrippa exists within two worlds at once.   

Living in two worlds at once is not uncommon; I guess many do live that way. They keep silent about it or must take an oath or due rest to regulatory laws that compel them – or for any other reasons. For instance, a stern Atheist, Nietzsche, had an awakening in a thunderstorm – the sudden overwhelming feeling of well-being came over him. Yet you won’t find him writing about magic or magic recognised as a power inside us or advocating means of tapping into this phenomenon. He remained firmly atheistic and merely warned about the consequence that killing aspects of spiritual religiosity like “God” would cause the societal disruption that exist now. The atheistic or rational instrumental response suggests that Nietzsche alluded to science and reason, which had progressed so far that we could no longer justify a belief in God. Of course, Agrippa would reject this instrumentalism reason outright.   

Agrippa believed that magic was central to the restoration of humanity. Individuals can draw closer to divinity and achieve spiritual powers by resurrecting primordial wisdom from Hermetic and Kabbalistic traditions. During Agrippa’s Italian period in 1517, he explored these otherworldly ideas, which often contrasted with his understanding of Catholicism. He posited that through this reconciliation with the divine, one might attain god-like powers, which are cultivated through natural, miraculous causation and reinforced by a pre-lapsarian perspective—an examination of the state of humanity before the Fall.

In this context, Adam possessed miraculous abilities that allowed him to manipulate nature, and Agrippa suggested that such powers could be attained by reconciling oneself with God. Magic, in this period, is a by-product of that reconciliation. The Fall, prompted by Eve in creation mythology—where Eve symbolizes dialectical reason—illustrates the challenge when humans attempt to reason their way to the divine. However, Agrippa argues that this approach is flawed. He asserts that one cannot reason oneself to the divine because the mind has also fallen, diluting the ability to understand through reason. Agrippa addresses this issue by advocating a Protestant-style faith, where a mystically informed faith can create a direct connection to the divine. This faith allows the mind to leap the divine, creating a circuit where the individual and God are momentarily united. This mystical faith is then expressed and encoded through words and language in written texts.

Agrippa’s divided perspective presents one side with a sceptical dimension and the other with a magical one. While each side may offer an incomplete view, they are perfectly aligned because both are ultimately connected through reconnection with the divine. This connection is rooted in mystical acts of faith that support both perspectives. By exploring the harmony of scepticism and magic, one realises they are more integrated and cohesive than one might initially believe.

There is a striking parallel between that time and our current situation. Our sceptical movement challenges the rational modalities that have significantly influenced our contemporary understanding of cosmology. While atheism might be in decline, it has entangled our cosmology in a questionable linear framework that includes both rationality and religion. With its dry reliance on logic, the promise of hyperrealism and space exploration claims that technical innovation represents the true meaning of progress. Those who advocate this often mirror the assertions made by Christian Republicans and conservatives regarding their definitions of progress. Similarly, Ayn Rand’s libertarians superficially embrace left-wing concerns, yet they impose the same forms of authoritarianism and coercion—through corporate capitalism—that they claim to oppose. This kind of reasoning becomes self-referential, leading to a focus on form over content. As it grows increasingly irrational, it tramples over reality in the name of self-proclaimed truths.

As they attempt to deceive the world into believing that the latest technological breakthroughs are new, one fundamental truth remains: corporations and capitalism are unethical. Their primary focus is self-interest and competition. Neither technology nor instrumentalism has any inherent, logical, or structural connection to ethics, nor does it have a rational relationship to ethical considerations. Despite any claims of sentience, artificial intelligence does not possess opinions, nor does it have a destiny tied to concepts of good and evil or the progress of well-being versus destruction. If people perceive it as a novel advancement or an improvement in methods or production, it becomes a disheartening notion. As it trivializes human thought and argument, it becomes misguided to connect the Greek concepts of reason and virtue to technological change.

Superpowers – Consciousness can Exist Instrumental Reason Cannot: Agrippa’s effect is an example of completeness, much like the Yin and Yang symbol. It complements Descartes’s unfinished idea that an angel revealed to him that “the conquest of nature will be measured in numbers.” While this notion may have been relevant in his time, it now seems incompatible, as the spirit of mystery has been entirely stripped away. We currently find ourselves caught in a Hegelian madness, further intensified by scientism and rationalism. The left and right hands are centred and connected to Keter, with perpendicular attachments rather than dualities. Baudrillard describes the “metamorphosis of opposites that perpetuates itself in censored form” as a simulacrum. It becomes clear that Hegelian traps within the dialectic adopt opposing philosophies that contradict their fundamental ideology because they exist as a guise and never follow through on their promises.

Agrippa’s effect addresses the limitations of an instrumental version of reason, which would otherwise confine modern humans’ understanding due to a lack of imagination. In other words, instrumental reason has shaped our modern consciousness. Contemporary individuals struggle to comprehend concepts like angels and demons because their thinking has become dominated by functional reasons. The irrational aspects of instrumentalism are often concealed in subtle and seemingly innocuous representations. For example, consider the truth of cosmology—how the Protestant fervour of the Illuminati council restructured the cosmos to align with an institution within an industrial-technical society, thereby limiting our choices. They compel society and individuals to endorse instrumental reason while, in contrast, intuition, common sense, or the authentic spirit of our consciousness would prevail if given a chance.

We covered the difference between sorcery and magic [in post 02] and loosely concluded sorcery is about power, and magic is about the artist. However, magic often gets regulated to power; there is an intricate difference: the utility of one is not the utility of the other. Take, for example, transhumanism … it is not transgenderism; transhumanism is an evolutional ideal for immortality. The utilitarian is the ascent and transformations through technological methods. The human quality of transgenderism and reason is not encapsulated in transhumanism’s utilitarianism. While there is merit to conclude a state cult(s) exists that can or may initiate a conspiracy where transgenderism is used as means of creating a new movement and religion. Still, it’s like revitalising the ancient Temple’s prostitutes historical facts for an instrumental idea [a Trans agenda] to modern-day transgenderism; its utilitarianism used as a reason.

Also, regulating gurus of magic as mere operators of intelligent agencies imparts a child-modifier to instrumental reason: The quality of magic, our intuition, and the artist have a broader reach than that. Even thought and argument are of central importance, as well as ethics and having a sense of the other and inclusive responsibility. So does imagination, allowing people to conceive of what is happening to their society, and intuition drive people to make decisions. The qualities of magic are not regulated by these conceived systems made by these perceived [god-like] untouchable elites.           

Utilitarianism used as reason kind of mimics its methods with woke-isim, where the making of sacred, marginalised gender and sexual identity groups becomes apparent. The difference is that it goes nowhere. It’s purely spiritual, while the later utilitarianism used as reason and instrumental reason goes straight to state power. The problem with the spiritual immutableness of the sacred is in its response to which such responses become shoehorned to a particular category.  Most conservative intellectuals agree that authentic transgender and gay communities don’t pay homage to state-cults engineered versions of trans and gay manufactured ideologies; the real does not speak for the fake.

Consider the Republican campaign aimed at banning abortions at the federal level. This reflects a broader trend concerning women’s rights and freedoms observed in Western democracies over the last fifty years. Right-wing conservatives often refuse to provide women with choices. The collaborative relationship between patients, mental health institutions, and doctors highlights the reality of instrumental reasoning. Recent reports from conservative states reveal tragic consequences, such as women dying from sepsis after doctors deny necessary D&C (dilation and curettage) treatments during miscarriages. Additionally, rape victims who become pregnant face similar denials, with decisions being made not by them but by others. Regardless of the reasons, when a woman is pregnant, unwarranted interventions often occur. This approach to instrumental reasoning permeates both religious and political philosophies. It leans towards fascism while superficially aligning with the principles of Christianity, which often overshadow objective facts and data. Ultimately, this instrumentalist mindset, along with obsessive structuralism and unethical professional practices, forces rational individuals to think, communicate, and, when necessary, act in irrational ways.

This irrationality arises from the “I love you” science advocates—those extreme empiricists who hold science and rationalism close to their hearts, believing it will answer all questions. These unlikely allies of groups that promote outer space and astronomy emerged during the Wernher von Braun era of rocketry and later with NASA. The peculiar atmosphere surrounding this institution evolved into a dominant group that resembles a cult. This group has a viewpoint similar to traditional cosmology, which sees space (or hyperreal space) as central to many religious and secular cosmic perspectives. Their approach can be characterised as extreme gatekeeping.

A prominent flat earther, known as Jeranism, has been labelled a shill by the community for decades. He often expressed scepticism and commented on NASA astronaut videos; however, it was clear that he was a form of controlled opposition and a grifter. The so-called final experiment failed to prove anything, as the alleged trip to Antarctica was questionable at best and likely a sun-worship ritual. This final experiment conflated celestial observations with our terrestrial foundation. When you compare their instrumental reasoning with observable facts, the latter holds more merit. There is also a significant amount of mythical data supporting the idea of multiple suns in the sky. Such claims reinforce mythicism and faith in gods and primeval sun gods, which dominate our astro-theological allegory. Suppose one chooses to distance oneself from the instrumentalism of scientism and embrace Agrippa’s sceptical reasoning by accepting instrumentalism and observance. You would have ice crystals within a layer, membrane, or firmament on a flat plane that act as reflective components of the Sun that shine through the firmament, causing reflective multiplicities. Regardless of what the Sun and Moon are doing over our heads, it has no bearing on what Earth looks like.

I have suggested that scientism acts as a Protestant subset of an alchemical movement that gained momentum after the death of Giordano Bruno; however, scientism itself is a modern concept. The initial emergence of scientism from atheistic sceptics slowed down after the controversies surrounding Epstein. It’s important to note that this shift was linked to waning idealism and the decline of the institutions that supported it. Scepticism toward science was already present before the rise of flat Earth theories, particularly in the debates questioning the moon landing, which cast doubt on the validity of space travel itself. This scepticism about going to the moon includes a deeper inquiry into the validity of space itself.        

The rise of political correctness, often associated with the term “woke,” originated from activism that found a place within a declining sceptic movement. This group had a talent for viewing history through a revisionist lens, but their influence did not have the same impact as their opposers. The anti-woke movement, which praised intellectual figures advocating for resistance, also employed a revisionist approach. However, their influence led to the emergence of a fascist movement driven by a hostile nationalist right, a charismatic demagogue, and a fragmented democracy. The anti-woke groups have surpassed any extremism that woke groups might aspire to achieve. Currently, atheism and woke culture are closely intertwined, with activism resembling a variant of the MeToo movement aimed at addressing abuse and harassment against women within that framework. What began as a movement for moral justification has transformed into something far more complex. This evolution has ultimately dismantled the sceptic movement altogether, and with figures like Epstein benefiting from backing many institutions,” its credibility has come under scrutiny.

The new atheist movement, despite its criticisms of science, ironically exhibits many anti-science characteristics. While the new atheists attempt to support their flawed arguments with material, independent leftist media, like mainstream media, often submits to the rationality of scientism. Independent media can share a similar scepticism found in conspiracy-theory media, which has been prevalent on the radio for decades before the internet era. However, there is a lack of doubt among independent left and right media; their focus is primarily on data points and facts, even if they are manipulated. There is a noticeable absence of awareness about the external world and its mysteries. The discussion is devoid of mystery; it is purely satellized in its detachment. The global warming farce and Covid enterprise are such examples of these instrumental reasoning in the form of “scientist say” or self- referetialisim guarded as gatekeepers.      

At the same time, in politics, the echo chambers of independent anti-woke right-wing grifters have their own sets of denial regarding modern republican connection to a negative nationalist party. There is a female black conservative [who thinks she’s white like the blind Richard Pryor train scene in which he realises is not white] denying outright the existence of white supremacist Klans that has links to government and Masonry – to a Jewish social media personality advocating the legitimacy of Zionism and Israel’s war crimes against Palestine. When both sides of independent media are in denial and gate-keeps, obfuscate, propagandise, and straw-man the “truth”, there is no moral imperative. If everyone is in denial, we are only left with the method – therefore, who will take the baton and play the role of real reason? The fallacy in conspiracy theory is to perceive theory as absolute or rather for them to have the tendency to believe they know the secret from those who hold the secret. There is a tendency everywhere for the rational method to be kept secret. Secrecy is just one aspect of “rational” systems, and it should be understood that there is a difference between “systems and methods” versus “thought and argument.” The methodology is not a deformation of reason; it’s no reason at all – it’s merely a requirement for structure and utilitarianism.     

The Hegelian dialectic trappings of left and right politics are there purely for tactics, a sleight of hand or distraction, and popularity in media merely moved from studios to bedrooms and house offices. Having implied instrumentalism and utilitarianism [method vs. thought] are the same as their functions are themselves. However, functions are not qualities. They are merely the transient awareness of someone’s taking notice, examined in how the rich view low-paying jobs like maids and farmhands, predominantly the role allocated to South Americans from the US border. A delusional view would be that the incompetence of the rich merely doesn’t want their slaves gone because, to them, it’s a quality used to good effect. Meanwhile, the left, which still exists to the dismay of the cynical pragmatic types, tries to cut out this instrumentality so it doesn’t block it from other qualities. Like those of a nationalist fervour who attaches its artificial qualities and drags it down to directionless competence, in the case of reason, instrumentalism drags it down to a process, to shop-floor techniques such as efficiency. But will ultimately fail in the wake of a failing empire. 

Or in hopes that their own citizens will take on these unwanted jobs – and even in that regard, they are jobs too complicated for them as younger generations filled with autism, trauma, and mental illness are generations with no basic skills, yet lives decadent, yet incompetent. In a system where education has become entrainment leaves little hope to future generations. However, you must not expand the scope of such awareness worldwide; otherwise, it becomes generalisations. What makes society and civilisation is precisely its more complex, less clear, more long-term, non-utilitarian aspects. Notions of losing expertise as a warning are a concern. Countries like Australia didn’t lose their expertise outside of a falling empire. Rather, trade, manual construction, and engineers outnumbered doctors and nurses, which is a need. And so it was a consensus around the nature “nature of the other”, which solidified the idea of responsible individualism and social inclusion, which drove the movement for egalitarian and flexible immigration for doctors and nurses to work in Australia.

The pragmatic nihilist cyanic believes the established ruling class has dismantled any resistance and gives no hope and no way out for their children’s future and their children. It doesn’t help that cyanic nihilists mimic the sceptical right’s enthrallment of the false promises that demagogues and the fascist right would give as opposed to a dying left still fighting for those freedoms unmoved by any action the Clinton era produced because they understand not to be captured or taken into false individualism – that standing individual that thinks itself as a concept, therefore, thinking itself into existence.     

Instrumental reasoning can give the effectiveness tariffs that an increase can boost the economy or by halting funds sent to Ukraine benefits the U.S. However, the complexity of this situation is often misunderstood by the public, who may not grasp the utility and processes behind tariffs. While a straightforward approach might suggest stopping the funds, this could be irrational. Halting the funds could lead to greater international debt than if we continued to provide assistance.

There is a clear distinction between being a leftist and being a liberal. Liberalism often fails to engage critically with capitalism, imperialism, and the policies of the Democratic Party, tending instead to pay mere lip service to conservative sentiments. As a result, the responsibility for meaningful critique falls to independent leftist media since all mainstream media has become compromised. While independent media is essential for providing a rational perspective on current events, it must also be open to the complexities of life and the mysteries of the universe. Progression, independent media should not rely solely on rationality but also embrace the more enigmatic aspects of existence.

An increase in leftist media could be a potential solution. However, the key is being open to the vague assumptions often promoted by these entities, which ask individuals to trust their intuition. They tend to follow the same approach as mainstream media, usually relying on self-referential viewpoints, such as the phrase “scientists say.” This trend is a response to those who believe the liberal class is becoming non-existent, replaced by a unified subset that adheres strictly to “woke” ideologies. This group often undermines imaginative storytelling and an understanding of archetypes. Those who recognise this dynamic adopt a totalitarian approach reminiscent of the propaganda methods engineered by Mao. However, what are commonly perceived as “woke” are ideologies that will come and go over time. Woke is as dead end ideology and only lingers in memes and those that bring up perceived social agenda topics [like transgenderisim] to light – are falling for the distraction.  

As much as the right-wing believes Maoism is communist, it’s more socialist in its iteration, yet it still ended in a state capitalist system. The state still effectively controls the means of production in Maoism, and the hugely oppressive neo-bourgeoisie governmental class exploits the workers. This ideology still has large amounts of authority, social class, and money. The state killed millions of workers under Maoism. Maoism is state capitalism, not communism or socialism. Communism as a socio-economic ideology was never really achieved – its achievement can only be found in Star-Trek, as the fictional tale did away with currency altogether. In that lore, they had World War Three before they achieved this utopia.

What is apparent and overtakes Woke’s lived ideology are those that extremely oppose it, like anti-woke independent personalities, MAGA cults, nationalist white supremacists, right-wing fundamentalist groups, and right-wing Christians – that use the same methodology of propaganda now have more influence in media and independent media than any liberalism media of the past. Made evident in Project 2025, an attempt at the unitary executive theory of power, the president acts as an Emperor with loyalist sycophants that surround the leader – destroys any parts of government that are good and gets rid of the regulatory state, lets corporations get away with unethical behaviour – while letting billionaires into government to loot the treasury and trying to undermine social benefits on their false notion that somehow it effects the deficit, and of course this is not true in fact it finances the deficit. In some cases congress needs to payback money they borrowed from social security.

Superpowers – Difference between Escaping the Bonds of Time and Mystical Acts of Faith: Reason tries to morph itself into utilitarianism when up against a paradox. Of course, there is nothing wrong with methodology and systems or management and efficiency, as they are necessary functions. Take, for instance, when we realise that our system is the Egregore and democracy merely functions underneath it. Philip K Dick’s “empire never ended’ has its milieu in that system an entity in itself; democracy as a system of method is a system in a stranglehold, yet the empire is in collapse; therefore, where is the human quality of reason encapsulated? You could say the Egregore has a long hibernation process, and before it awakes, we can figure our way out. However, it will inevitably fall; the encapsulation can only be addressed in dreams and your imagination.

You can see instrumental reasoning working its way through a utilitarianism method, and the system has become a living entity. The Greek universe is a complex family of active gods and oracles, and the rational universe becomes merely part of the system’s management. Everything is demystified in this animism and reason approach. In reality, they were implying that these gods and oracles were not about justifying the decline in superstition; instead, they were a way to embrace the world’s complexity. Yes, the system is a type of Egregore, at the same time a literal Egregore can exist in our mystical reality.

We’ve established that those endowed with the imagination can bring down spirits to earth; this is a magical, natural, intuitive act. However, because of the aggressive nature of the imagination, these elites are but a few. They are weird and isolated; they are the artist-prophets. We’ve also distinguished the difference between magic and sorcery. Still, the ideas about magic are narrowed into secret cults influencing the future through power and sorcery, thus engulfing the complexity of magic to the powerful one per cent. They’ve taken the pagan religion of the Magi to Satanic levels of worship, where stories embedded in stars and constellations are ritualised in astro-theology and star magic. Often, these rituals follow the same motive of atheism throguh Darwin’s of ascent through transformation. To escape the bonds of time had the same pattern as the elite’s historical reach for immortality, now becoming more prevalent to the public in AI & Transhumanism projects.   

The Magi, meaning “magic,” originated from ancient religious traditions. The original Magi derived their magical powers from what is known as positive consciousness. This state of mind involves recognising that subjectivity is meaningful only when it remains open to understanding the reality beyond itself. It embodies a positive outlook and appreciation for the world, filled with wonder and interest. History provides limited information about the Magi, with most of it coming from the writings of Herodotus in the fifth century B.C. And earlier; Plato also mentioned the later stages of the Magi religion, noting their remarkable purity of faith. The Magi had no images of gods, temples, or altars. However, they practised a ritual in which they ascended to the highest mountain summits to offer sacrifices to Zeus, whom they identified with the cosmos or Firmament. Additionally, they made offerings to the Sun, Moon, Earth, and the elements of fire, water, and wind.

The Persians later developed a worship of the sun god, Mithras, who bears many similarities to Jesus and nearly rivalled Christianity in popularity in Rome. The Magi, skilled in dream interpretation and their knowledgeable scholars, were descendants of the Shamans from the Neolithic era. What distinguished them, however, was that the power of the shamans was derived from Mana, the magical force that permeates nature. The Magi possessed knowledge of mathematics, astrology, and divination expertise. In our previous discussion, we mentioned Monads, which refer to a higher human ego and soul. The son of mind is called Mana-saputra, linking the Neolithic concept of Mana (the force of nature) to our higher mind, referred to as Manas.

Gilbert Murray, a supposed telepathist [thought reading], describes his process of positive consciousness and higher Manas. By remembering a scene or event that partly eludes him, half a picture begins to form in his mind, along with a few tantalizing threads of association, but not the complete scene. This implies that our mental processes are “occult” and mysterious as the powers of thaumaturgists or telepathists. This is not merely channelling this something else; you could argue that Murray “remembered” what was happening in Huxley’s mind. Either that or used the exact mechanisms we use to recall something, but reached into Huxley’s mind. 

How does one summon these powers? There is a prerequisite, and there are elite artists. The rationalism of instrumental reasoning has caused most people to fixate on narrow perspectives. Gaining enlightenment—what Alan Watts calls cosmic consciousness—is a genuine experience; this is the Spark that the Gnostics discuss. It is possible to achieve temporary heightened awareness and enhanced psychic abilities. You can become harmoniously connected to the universe [synchronistic whole] in a way that transcends simply being aware of synchronistic patterns of symbols and language, which would be more of an intuitive act. The path to this enlightenment is not conventional, as it requires the development of positive consciousness. Zoroastrianism—the ancient religion of the Persians — particularly emphasizes this recognition of positive consciousness. However, a significant challenge arises when our contextual understanding of collective memory precedes historical accuracy. The Elite’s secret heterodox alignment with demonic forces in the past and present may not align with the views held during the time of Magi and Zoroastrianism.

The Persian scriptures, the Gathas, state that the Supreme Being, Ahura Mazda, created two twins, who produce reality and unreality. Reality and unreality are seen as the essential elements from which the world is created. They are not positive and negative, but both are equally positive. It was only later that they degenerated into Good and Evil. (Later still, there was a further degeneration, when Ahura Mazda, the first cause, was identified with the Good, and his enemy Ahriman with the devil.) For reality is meaning – out there – and unreality is human subjectivity, our tendency to get enmeshed in our self- chosen values. We derive our power to act, to work, to concentrate, to evolve, from this same subjectivity, so it cannot be regarded as negative or evil. It becomes negative through human stupidity and defeat-proneness. – Colin Wilson, The Occult a History

The fundamental difference between elites who seek to escape the constraints of time and humanity’s spiritual evolutionary progress lies in our recognition of the Magi, who mastered the occult powers of nature and engaged in nature worship. This understanding leads us to Zoroastrianism, which evolved into the various religions of Mesopotamia, characterised by their angels and demons, and ultimately gave rise to the ruling cults of priests and state religions. There is an endeavour to worship fallen angels and liberate their spirits from our Archonic entrapment so they may once again dwell among the stars of heaven. Those who help and align with that cosmic goal are often promised power and immortality. However, this journey is fraught with darkness. Their quest for enlightenment can be forced, leaving spirit and body damaged, leading to doubt about whether the experience is genuinely enlightening or merely a demonic process. This approach attempts to dominate mysticism for practical purposes through magic. In contrast, there is Gnostic distinction in the principle of “being in the world, but not of it” – that it is in the heart, in the Gnosis (knowledge) and the spirit. Theosophists argue that we possess a ray of the Supreme Spirit. This path is an inward journey, unrelated to escapism, as the spiritual planes or spheres already exist within us here and now.

Agrippa was well-read and immersed himself in the works of Renaissance thinkers and esoteric philosophers. However, even though he was familiar with the literature, he deeply disdained Scholasticism, notably Aristotle. He believed that Scholasticism failed to achieve its goal of resolving theological controversies through dialectic reasoning because he felt that reason alone could not accomplish this task. As we noted, Baudrillard’s idea of “meta-morphing opposites” reiterates itself in a censored format, which serves as a method for that dialectic. Elite state cults utilise this concept to misdirect the public. Agrippa’s foundational ideas on his Sceptical Term influenced prominent thinkers like Albertus Magnus, Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Scotus, and William of Ockham. One significant figure who impacted Agrippa was Joachim of Fiore, known for his apocalyptic views. Joachim suggested that humanity is currently living in the age of the Sun and that we would eventually transition to the age of the Spirit. Agrippa agreed with this assertion, positing that we are indeed entering the age of the Spirit. Agrippa’s interpretation of Nicholas of Cusa’s concept of “learned ignorance” inculcates the idea of the “meta-morphing of opposites.” He argued that we do not come to know God through established propositions but rather through learned ignorance. In this framework, God represents the unity of all opposites, where all truths and falsehoods coexist. In essence, God embodies the coincidence of opposites, and through this understanding, one can approach the divine via learned ignorance.

Agrippa’s effect dissolves fundamentalism’s narrow view of magic and occultism by differentiating the dark side of occultism with the honest acts of mystical faiths. Here, faith is not just belief in the absence of evidence but faith in the mystical leaning upon. The Greek word for faith is “trust”, like trust-fall or the act of love requires a leap of faith. The artist-prophets endowed with imagination and the spirit of magic is not always agents for the enemy, but they realise that the enemy will often seek you out. Agrippa’s intimation implores mystical faiths as a type of jailbreak towards the divine, and within this connection, you become the message hub of esoteric information and faith. Such aspects align with the artist-prophet; it is the magical direction towards the same mystical faith.     

.

.

Mystics & Artist-Prophets:

.

---

.

Superpowers – The Infinite/Finite Reality: As we continue from the previous post regarding mathematicians and reality, we conclude that math is not reality. However, Dr Dear Radin, a parapsychologist, disagrees with this truism; instead, he thinks math is reality. He believes any sufficiently complex system that involves recursion (mathematical linguistics to describe repeated procedure) and enough interconnections can be consciousness; therefore, can we make a robot complex enough to be like the brain that has these recursion circuits? The answer is clearly yes, and we will get there relatively soon: a robot with the complexity of the brain running on silicone or some other semiconductor. The hardware will be like data from Star Trek, which is a conscious robot. Not only does he believe this to be the case, but he also imparts these Robots or A.I will be conscious and psyche – to be precise, more psyche than your relative empath or clairvoyant humans.  

Of course, this prediction will not come true for a fundamental mythological reason in regard to the creator-God of this world. I feel like I’m repeating myself every time these A.I subjects come into my per-view. The creator-God was unable to create His first Adamas without having the unknown help from the Goddess Aeon of wisdom; you could say it’s an intuition component. To suggest humans can make something the creator-God couldn’t reeks of pseudo-science optimism [man becomes more intelligent than the creater-God]. If you can’t be moved by apocryphal myths, even on the rational side, a summary that encapsulates intuition as the utility for gnosis to be derived sparks of wisdom and inspiration defined Blavatsky’s “taught” concept of receiving wisdom itself.

This is also what Kant’s emphasis was about. Something out there is generating these types of sensory perceptions and giving them to us. It runs counterintuitive to “quantum oneness propositions”, the notion that our collective thought is creating our reality of matter – as a result, the oneness aspect only carries half of its propositions. The micro-cosmic world (quantum, if you will) may or may not exist. We know it does as it is partial to our observance, and the double-split experiment reinforces that light behaves like waves. What else behaves like waves? – Water behaves like waves, seldom surf waves, but rather a unifying liquid of transparency. Of course, there is this apocryphal notion of waters in the firmament. The contention is that anything artificial beyond the complexity of the human brain and consciousness doesn’t have the faculties to receive these other perceptions given to us. And this must be local; otherwise, we, on a quantum level, are also creating the infinite hyperrealism cosmos with all its galaxies, stars and solar systems, which is beyond comprehension.  

In a mathematical framing, as was discussed in the last post, there is no way to measure this impossibility; you have to enclose it or make up a set size, thereby being able to measure it. This astronomical postulation is where they realise they are bounded by a set size too large – an infinity so large it’s immeasurable; even measuring it is pointless. This impossible proposition parallels the notion that technocrats can create robots that are psyche wizards that are more intuitive humans than Radin suggests. A sleight of hand to imply dehumanising positions involving an evolutionary automaton can be more divine. I’ve said that assumption or probability is too large to become real. There is also the fact that the amount of data needed for A.I to mimic theory of mind is monumental. A field of warehouses needs to be implanted to have a fancy interactive search engine that you can use. It’s also increasing, which means that a single CPU is not large enough, and no data sets and computers in the world can analyse our cosmos.        

Radin is a person who engages in noetic science, wanting to merge the supernatural phenomena of psi and clairvoyance through the language of (pseudo) physics and mathematics. And if there ever was a “bullshit job, this is maybe one of them” – though having some knowledge of the spirit realm and its phenomenon is partially credible, the other half only engages in butt-kissing technocrats and corporatist tail-end for simply needing to keep that grant money flowing; scientism projects leads nowhere.  

Radin imparts that there is nothing particularly special about human physiology and that consciousness may be an illusion. It might raise the complexity of brain activity, although he doubts this. Then, if it’s not correct, it’s something else and may rise from other forms of idealism (Panpsychism, etc.), and then a thinking robot machine one day could have consciousness. Panpsychism is a subset of idealism borrowing from animism that asserts all things (material & biological) have types of spirit, but Panpsychism has consciousness instead. Of course, this is completely wrong. You can’t make something theoretical as a base for evidence for a pseudo-argument disguised as empirical concerning a Robot having higher psyche abilities than humans could. Animism falls in line towards vibrational frequencies rather than spirits usually understood.

In contrast, we have adaptive behaviours in A.I its function is relatively consigned to computer language orientation. It’s like programming a light fixture to turn several different colours on, but it does not mean it has either awareness or consciousness; it only has a specific code embedded on a micro-board. A.I, however, is far more sophisticated with its self-learning, but does not move away from that simple base function of executing external code languages.

Radin has experience consulting around Silicon Valley types and praises Elon Musk and his robotic programme. That’s unsurprising; Radin’s useless job depends on firmly wedging his science fiction exaltation to hopeful reality. He says in a possible future that: “these robots will be levitating wizards” They’re going to have more psyche than humans because they don’t have all the psychological and brain mechanisms that humans do – which act as a blockage against psyche awareness. He delves into the possible consequences of a future where this magical levitating robot exists. He believes this firmly because he doesn’t think there is anything special about the human body. This guy is no different to any science-fiction writer. The only difference is that science-fiction writers do not coax a non-fiction probability. Just two years after he made such a claim, a TV series called “Raise by Wolves” happened to come along, whose whole premise is around A.I messiah, who happens to be magical, levitates and is archetypically a wizard.

Gnostic mythology acknowledges that the spark of divinity in humanity contributes to our complexity and uniqueness—something that no machine can replicate. Scientists have yet to understand the mysteries of the brain entirely. Therefore, it is a shallow assumption to believe that the human body can be replaced by artificial means, as the body’s unique and spiritual qualities are irreplaceable. While digital approximations may exist—such as attempting to measure infinity within defined limits—these will always represent a fundamental barrier; this is the gap that persists. This gap is akin to a hidden aspect of Daat, where proper understanding emerges between wisdom and knowledge. In other words, the human body is too uniquely specific and special beyond the comprehension of man’s ability to mimic it artificially.

Radin grasps the back end of Bohm’s work regarding implicate order, where he describes a fluid substance that is inherently mental, which is simply at the bottom. From within, everything from the physical world merges. This fictional fluid is likened to the black goo in X-files, Prometheus, and the milky substance in Westworld, all vying to replicate the complexity of the blood cells.

Bohm’s implicate order is an ultra-holistic view; it connects with everything else. This means that a single element could reveal details about every other element. Bohm’s Implicate Order is a theoretical utility to explain particle behaviour, such as subatomic particles having the ability to interact when light/time years apart. Bohm believed this behaviour comes from unobserved sub-quantum forces and hidden particles that pose no conflict with causality and reality. He says this hidden reality is a deeper dimension of reality – and that space-time is also derived in the same place of a deeper level of objective reality. This reality is called the implicate order, in which everything else is connected. In this wholeness is the totality of existence as an undivided, boundless flowing movement.

It’s as fictional as the hidden Mycelial network found in Star Trek Discovery. The only difference is that Bohm’s theory is closer to how one would describe how a theoretical-holographic reality works. A hidden reality that manifests existence; Some of Bohm’s Implicate Order is a rip of Blavatsky’s work. It leans more toward quantum and hyperreal cosmology understanding only to justify pseudoscience and science-fiction rhetoric.

At the start of this thesis collection, we already derived why space/time does not exist, but time (separated from space) exists and seems to be endless. Gravity does not exist, but some other force (in the quantum world); space is not genuine; therefore, it’s not infinite. Perhaps implying infinity in the x,y,z context where the direction of infinity is derived in “y” instead it’s in the “z” or the “x” is more credible, and there is no such thing as a Higgs Boson, etc. Bohm’s work attempts to quantify or explain away that something is out there, giving us these sense perceptions that are contrary to particles’ theoretical behaviours. Let’s say that something out there is creator-God, and the Implicate Order is something to replace that.

It’s tough for these meta-physics/psyche-physics theorists to understand mathematical limitations regarding the fictional language they created. It’s an understanding I mentioned in the previous post regarding the conscious as the finite and sub-conscious being the infinite, which is also derived from the Son of Man’s meaning that it’s finite in the expressions of Jesus’s humanity, and the Son of God expressed in the infinite expression of his divinity. As Spinoza puts it, “to the adequate knowledge of the essence of things”, to which intuition will deliver you there. Ironically, denying this limitation is also a denial of knowledge, hence meta-physics thinkers’ inability to grasp intuition and animism. 

Trying to answer the mysteries of consciousness through physics, a type of psyche-physics, but when physics is steered towards the inexplicable, it becomes a misrepresented filled with errors towards the psychologism of the mind, where otherwise philosophical psychologism has already been achieved. Mathematics, being fungible in its process, like the physics of mechanical engineering, firmly places a finite approach. When it starts to impart a cosmic hyperrealism, the infinite becomes (ironically finite, but wrong), and it’s no surprise the so-called material (physics) science has an interest in consciousness as it has that infinite quality. The result would be ineffective. The errors in space cosmology will repeat that ineffectiveness towards consciousness.    

Allan Watts put it simply through the spotlight and floodlight analogy. Anyone trying to define consciousness through multiples of measure, i.e. psyche-physics, theories, and fiction, is deluding themselves; consciousness is almost impossible to define. A hypothesis in theosophy (Secret Doctrine, proem) manifests the One Life force. Blavatsky’s one life force adage is what Bohm plagiarised for his Implicate Order, but in his, its behaviour assumes the claptrap of meta-physics and comic-book science fiction. The most common definition of consciousness amongst the collective norms is acts of awareness of pain, love, joy, hatred, etc., or experiences of insight, perception of thoughts, etc.

Allan Watts viewed consciousness as an intuitive act that functions in real time through the analogies of a spotlight and afloodlight. The standard definitions of “spotlight consciousness” and “floodlight consciousness” can also be viewed as two types of learning.

	Generally speaking, we have two kinds of consciousness. One I will call the “spotlight,” and the other the “floodlight.” The spotlight is what we call conscious attention, and we are trained from childhood that it is the most valuable form of perception. When the teacher in class says “Pay attention!” everybody stares, and looks right at the teacher. That is spotlight consciousness; fixing your mind on one thing at a time. You concentrate, and even though you may not be able to have a very long attention span, nevertheless you use your spotlight: one thing after another…
	However we also have floodlight consciousness. For example, you can drive your car for several miles with a friend sitting next to you, and be completely absorbed in talking to your friend. Nevertheless, your floodlight consciousness will manage the driving of the car, it will notice all the stoplights, the other idiots on the road, and so on, and you will get there safely without even thinking about it.

.

Allan Watts says we must overcome the illusion of space (between two intervals like birth at one end and death at the other) as a separate thing. People often regulate this aspect as an event in time that has no function because we have adopted a hyperrealism cosmos consisting of stars and galaxies – that has been written off because it’s too vast and infinite. However, space is the essential function within the space: “You can’t have separate stars unless there is a space around them” – eliminate the space and phenomenon, and it wouldn’t occur, and vice versa. So, the bodies in space and space are two bodies of the same continuum; they’re related together in the same way as the back and the front. When you recognise intervals as connective, you can understand how you are not just a mere flash of consciousness between two eternal darknesses.      

Through common sense, you realise life is a pattern of immense complexity, and what calls yourself a living organism – that body our body is recognisable. However, as it is recognisable now, it won’t be in the future. As a flame in the candle is never a constant, but as a stream of hot gas, we say the flame of the candle as if it were a constant. As it’s recognised as a constant pattern, the spear shape outline of the flame and colourisation is a constant pattern. In this same way, we are constant patterns; the constancy lies in our actions rather than the being, like the way we dance, only there is no “we” there is only the dance. It is like a game of hide and seek because life is pulsation “on” and “off”, and by being this pulsation, we know it’s there. 

The denial that we are distinct creatures—a distortion of the concept of consciousness—creates what Erich Fromm describes as “the freak of the universe.” We alone can “feel evicted from paradise.” But what is paradise? Its interpretations vary based on individual perspectives; on a deeper level, it can be seen as an unconscious connection to the inner structure of the universe—something Fromm referred to as nature. This perspective helps explain the ruling class’s disregard for the planet: decades of attempts to reshape it, exploit it, and hoard its resources, all driven by the ignorance that the interconnected whole can be reduced to its sense of psychological homelessness. 

On this denial, we feel separated by the hopelessness of mortality and old age, and to counter it, they build robots for a transhumanism project (consciousness transfer to machines) or either to spawn an A.I psyche wizard. Either way, in a mythological sense, it’s a notion of denial of being evicted from the womb. Sophia and her unwanted creator-God fulfil this alienation, but unlike her shame, she gave us something to us that is heaven-sent—from here brought forth a jealous God.

Radin employs magic to reflect superstition, attempting to frame Bohm’s ontology with a vague hope of sounding empirical by associating it with the recognized figure of a prominent quantum thinker. The reference to “Bohm” represents an acceptance of magic as trivial as hyperreal rationalism. If Radin can exploit magic in this manner, it must exist at some profound, unconscious level.

Similarly, mathematics is regarded as a form of magic, as trivial as the superstitions that assert that math is reality, despite the claims of cutting-edge physics and computer science (such as quantum processing). Math serves more as an artistic utility than a direct expression of nature. The mechanics of quantum entanglement are irrelevant in developmental phases or channelling processes. How much time is wasted on misguided equations of string theory? It can only be integrated into a shared world. A quantized structure does not describe what something is or what it is composed of; rather, it delineates the motions it performs. We should keep magic confined to its fundamental aspects: the symbolic, the mysterious, the abstract, the supernatural, the spiritual, and so on.

Superpowers – Future Predications Materialising Itself on Pearly Synch Spheres: It is like hiding and seeking where life and its environment pulsate between “on” and “off” – a flickering of in and out. In this way, we notice continuity, a familiarity recognised in vibrational frequencies where fast vibrations inside a restricted space give us the impression of solidity, and slow vibrations impress us and depress us over our life and death. Marshall McLuhan said: “We are driving a car looking at the rear vision mirror”, – meaning that the environment in which you believe exists in the present is a past one. The growth process (biology) is one in which higher orders always supersede the lower order, and the lower order cannot figure out when the higher order has taken over. This is the principle of growth and will always continue.

Regarding humanity’s existence and our surroundings, the growth process is a fundamental principle that applies to our common understanding. If we were to know the future, it wouldn’t be relevant to us, as it would already be considered the past. Any future we are aware of is merely an event we have already experienced; in this context, it is past. This reflects McKenna’s idea of “habit” as a derivative of entropy. However, our discussion focuses on time travel, and “habit” relates to that concept differently.

A Tik-Toker going by the name of @thehiddengod1, a self-proclaimed time traveller from the future, imparted some five months before the United States election that Trump would win by 67% over Harris. As it happens, He won by 50% – a weirdly 17% difference from the prediction. Okay, the number 17 comes up again. For the time-traveller to be correct, it must have 100 per cent accuracy; otherwise, they are just predictions. Trump won the election as the time-traveller foretold to several million, but was wrong on the percentage. The fundamental principle of growth had no bearing on this event, knowing the future did not change the outcome; perhaps it’s due to a mathematical discrepancy.

Trump won the election on the onset of the time-traveller prediction with the winning percentage statistic of [67% minus 50%] … 17. In his first presidency, he placed his hand on the Bible and took the oath of office on January 20, 2017 … becoming the president of the United States. He is 70 years old, 7 months, and 7 days from June 14, 1946 (his D.O.B) – January 20, 2017 [– a triple 777 astrologically charged]. Trump is also considered a time-traveller (by prediction theorists or synchs) named John Titor. His other names of other personas are John Barren and John Miller.

The connection stems from Trump’s uncle, his father’s brother John G. Trump, who was commissioned to mathematically decipher Nikola Tesla’s papers after the government acquired his work after his death. By this time [at around 1895], Tesla had made claims about time travel – Tesla liked to perform experiments on himself. There is an account where he performed one and inserted himself into a magnetic electric field. Tesla claimed he found himself in an entirely different time and space window, where he could simultaneously see the past, present, and future, while staying within this artificially created magnetic field.

Before Nikola Tesla died in 1943, his nephew came to his apartment and discovered that someone had already rummaged through his uncle’s belongings. Notably, several technical papers were missing, including a specific black notebook that the nephew knew about, which contained several hundred pages and was marked with the word “government.” Just two days after Tesla’s death, a government agency known as the United States Alien Property arrived and seized all of Tesla’s remaining work and possessions. This operation included two truckloads of papers and artefacts, and 30 barrels and bundles the agency took from storage. The documents recovered were so advanced that the agency called John G. Trump to help make sense of them.

John G. Trump had indicated that Tesla’s later works would lean towards speculative and philosophical areas, but workable principles or methods specific to real-life practicability had a diminished future. From here, it’s clear that a governmental smoke screen has been initialized, and it is possible that John G. Trump uncovered the secret theories. His Brother Fred’s (John’s brother / Donald’s father) vast fortunes would fund the hidden and private work on Tesla’s science. Tesla was part of a secret social group called Plus Ultra, where a group of genius men (including H.G. Wells) gathered in France to discuss preserving the world of tomorrow. Donald Trump had an infatuation with Plus-Ultra symbology and their ideology scattered in his mansion.

Tesla was fascinated by a pigeon; he proclaimed he loved the pigeon as much as a human loves their partner. We have Trump on a magazine cover with a pigeon symbolising the pigeon, a suggestion to his family’s wealth and where they got it from. They are part of the rich capable of managing the future of world economics, where a collapse is imminent, all while the empire clings to its death ropes. The American Empire hangs on that rope, resembling a Mussolini State where corporatism loyalty centres on a particular group and their self-interest. Intellectuals for the last 35 years had foreseen what was coming and remarked and warned of the dangers of such a moment.

As we know, Donald Trump is again president of the United States, and his most prominent endorser is Elon Musk, who owns many companies, one called Tesla. With Trump winning the presidency, it crossed a demarcation line toward neo-fascism that is going to take decades to get out of. An unforeseen or perhaps it was predicted, considering a conspiratorial supernatural theoretical notion of having a technological window to see future events, imparted this possibility as truth. Seen or not seen, there was a dominant alt/right-wing pipeline from social media to mainstream News Corp, demoralising and brainwashing half the population with propaganda and biased analysis. There is a calm inevitability surrounding the idiocy of the populace that would formulate a symptom in a demagogue. It’s as if half the populace manifested this figure through their denial and despair.

Even when the demagogue outlines policies that propose a heavily extreme nationalist agenda, like Project 2025 and biased immigration and abortion laws, the comedy of denial lingers among the populace. Their most prominent defenders are these grifters of the right-wing pipeline fame, with some proven to be paid shills of Russia’s Authoritarian agencies. There is also Propaganda in parody, “make comedy great again”, hiding their denial about an oncoming theocracy scheme in their default setting of ignorance and believing false promises about the economy. Televangelists aimed to create a quality of preaching religion and moralism in the context. Typically, such a fundamental phenomenon is governed by mythology and art. Unfortunately, the American populace still won’t get the point of context; edge-lords types can understand the “Joker” film, but cannot fathom “Civil War” and its warnings. They don’t know because the culprit is themselves. In other words, stupidity will swap out incentives, and denial will be why they voted against their interests.

Their blind faith towards a demagogue is as unbelievable as these science/fantasy writers like E. Bulwar-Lytton of Vril, Jules Verne’s Journey to the Centre of the Earth, and H.G. Wells’s Time Machine. Ingersoll Lockwood wrote a science/fantasy book in 1893 called “Baron Trump’s Marvellous Underground Journey”. Today, Donald Trump’s son is named Barron Trump. In the book, Baron becomes a wealthy aristocratic boy who lives in Castle Trump. Barron is also rich and grew up in Trump Tower. Baron is guided by The Don – Master of Masters. Donald Trump’s nickname is Don, a master of masters [a Freemason] who could be president [and is president]. In the book, Don gives Baron Manuscripts a map and directions that lead him to a portal through which he can travel to another dimension and time. The portal is equal to a wormhole, unlike Tesla’s magnetic field experiment, which the Trump family can access.

Ingersoll Lockwood authored another book in 1893 called “The Last President“, which has a modern synchronistic parallel to modern times. E. Bulwar-Lytton’s Vril are inspired by Ingersoll writings that influenced the Nazi movement that commissioned the search for the Vril force. The narrative made in 1893 emerged eerily similar to the events of modernity, like the uproar over Trump’s presidency in 2017. In 2024, “you’ll never have to vote again” –a quote ever so relevant to the book’s title, making it less of a title and more of a warning. In the book, the president appoints Mr. Pence to his cabinet, and as a result, Trump selects Mike Pence as VP in 2017. Donald Trump’s father, Friedrich Trump, was part of the Sonora Aero Club in the 1850s – a secret society working on anti-gravity aircraft. It’s assumed Friedrich was also a benefactor of Tesla. And, like all predictions, it becomes apparent after it has been instigated.

Of course, there is a difference between actual future predictions or (clairvoyance) and predictions that are accurate versus synchronistic symbols emerging from a universe fully aware and seeing you as radar for co-creation of sorts. Matt Groening, creator of the animated TV series “The Simpsons”, has been labelled “time traveller”, or is it a more accurate prediction based on synchronistic probabilities? Of course, he may be allowed to be part of Trump’s family’s secret, clandestine legacy of future predicting technologies acquired through Tesla’s works.

We talk about the finite and the infinite, where the infinite is like Bohm’s other hidden dimension that we can tap into, like a sub-space, a hyperreal-space language equated to the subconscious. As it works in real time, we hardly notice it.

In the fictional book Infinite Jest, a character named Thomas M. Flatto describes the theory of Infinite Jest and why it does … and what it does. … His theory is that appeal involves density, visual compulsion, and sophisticated holography. Where you get the neural density of a stage play without losing the selective realism of the viewer screen, that density and the realism might be too much to take. Dijkstra’s design data production wants us to go in with Algol to see if there is a Fourier equation in the root code’s Algol that will signify holo-grammatical activity going on, to which Marathe replies: M. Fortyaye finds the theory of content irrelevant. – Infinite Jest, Wallace, F D

The idea of density and structures is reminiscent of “Q-Star’s” concept of artificial intelligence in AGI, and its ability to transform. AGI’s literal name for their artificial intelligence sub-set is transformers. This coincides with Infinite Jest’s “Froier”, an algorithmic A.I, in Infinite Jest that has these technological concepts where Froier their A.I also transform. There is a bizarre physical connection between the structures of language (grammar) and the use of these technological holographic lenses connected to this annular fusion. Infinite Jest is a book written in 1996, with the author foreseeing modern predicaments about artificial intelligence and quantum computing.

Infinite Jest is a book about three different storylines that all follow the same plot, each being a mirror of the other. This triad of stories centres on addictions, whether with drugs or something else, which can be about obsessiveness and overthinking. It mutates a narrative that adopts psychoanalysis (psychology) with philosophy, metaphysics, psychedelics, spirituality, etc. Infinite Jest is set in the future and is assumed to be AI. It is a step further than our modern AI, in comparison. Algol is short for algorithmic language, but is also a Star, a.k.a. Demon Star, in the constellation Perseus. The Star Algol symbolises Medusa’s head being held by Perseus in the Sky.

The author himself, Wallace, says it’s as much as addiction but more to do with the sadness that’s been infused with culture right now. It involves losing a sense of purpose or organising principles, something you’re willing to give yourself a way to. The addictive impulse in our cultural era is engaging and powerful only because it’s a noticeable distortion of the religious impulse. Or an impulse to be part of something bigger. Hal’s storyline centring on a Tennis Academy with all its varying high-tech weirdness, where Hal must become technically better to achieve x,y,z – but the guy that runs the academy is also a Fascist. Whether the book implies it or not, he is the only one there who is saying remotely non-horrifying things, except it is horrifying because he is a Fascist. The scary thing about the nihilism of contemporary culture is that we are setting ourselves up with fascism because we are emptying more of our values, or, somewhat, our motivating spiritual principles, out of the culture. You are creating a hunger where we are driving ourselves, where we accept fascism. The thing about fascists is that they will tell you what to think, what to do and feel. We, as a culture, aren’t doing this for ourselves yet. – Interview, Wallace, F D              

So we have Trump and 17 coming up again in conjunction with a time-traveller prediction, while Trump is also a supposed time-traveller himself, as John Titor. He, like Bruno, is also the solar martyr due to the assassination attempt [possible ritual] on his life. The number 17, as we know, is the numerical signifier for ‘Q’, which is the signifier for Horus, and the death ritual surrounding Horus is astro-theologically charged. It’s an Osiris/Christ sacrifice of death. Bruno is a solar martyr for Q – he is also a placeholder for the Sun, and the Sun is the first light we see in the Horizon because the Sun moves across the Sky.

At night time, however, he becomes Perseus or the Mithraic equivalent; Mithras’s replacement as he holds Algol the Demon-Star, which is the Q-Star (AGI) symbolically represented by Elon Musk, who funds an algorithmic artificial intelligence program [Q-Star & AGI]. He also takes Tesla’s name for his company. Mithraism accepts ideas of androgynous transformations; Musk’s transsexual daughter had been open to the public about his lack of understanding towards his daughter’s sexuality. All of these intersect with Tesla, the supposed man who simultaneously saw the past, future, and present through his magnetic field experiment.

John Titor emerged online in the 2000s forums (including a non-existent Art Bell website), claiming to be a time-traveller from 2036. He proclaimed the United States was now several divided territories after a nuclear WW3 in which atomic missiles attacked the US. The Conspiracy theory claims that John Titor is Trump, and theoretically, he saw the United States post-nuclear event in World War III. On March 21, John Titor left our timeline; returning to 2036 before he left, he claimed UFOs are ETs that are humans visiting us from another timeline, and Dr. Dan Burisch of S4 (subset of area 51) reaffirmed this claim by differentiating aliens with ET’s – aliens are beings separate from the human race while ET’s are variations of future human races often called JRODs.

There is an alien artefact, the Yellow Orion Cube, which was recovered from UFO crash sites. This supposed quantum device is said to predict future events. Additionally, a device called the Looking Glass was discovered in Area S4. This device is believed to function as a Stargate, where space and time are folded, allowing for the convergence of timelines and predicting future events. The capacity of secret agencies to access these artefacts—natural Stargates that can foresee future events—is thought to be connected to the recovery of an ancient Sumerian Cylinder Seal found in Baghdad years ago. Whether you believe John Titor or even these intelligent agencies, remember the X-Files character Deep Throat accepted truth: the truth is often sandwiched between two lies. [Read more on Post 30]

John Titor also sent a cryptic message on how NASA solved the overheating problem on your space plane. Of course, it refers to the Space Shuttle Columbia that disintegrated on February 1, 23, during re-entry due to overheating issues. The shape of the smoke from the shuttle is Cancer, the constellation that happens to be Elon Musk’s Zodiac sign. The Mandalay Hotel, shaped like Cancer, was owned by Trump, the Heaven or Las Vegas connection. Of course, Mandalay Bay was the stage for former CIA gun runner Paddock attempting to shoot down a fuel tank of Janet Air, a private Jet that flies non-stop to Area 51. Elon would eventually do what NASA does by starting Space-X. Elon Musk, who is a crypto-fascist, no longer hides his moral ambiguity as he sides with Trump.

David Bowie plays Tesla in the film Prestige. He is also the man who fell from earth and the man who sold the world. Kurt Cobain covered that song; he also covered Lead Belly’s “where did you sleep last night” – and apparently, Lead Belly was the first ever to use the term “woke” when he suggested staying woke to his listeners regarding nine Alabama men of colour accused of raping two white women. It meant being aware of or being vigilant of your surroundings.

The active part of our intuition has less to do with mysterious forces but with our current choices, where it exercises real options. The left has been silenced and co-opted by radical cult groups stemming from the old state cults entrenched in Mithraism liturgy, guided as woke, damaging what is to be liberal. All the while, extreme anti-woke groups on the right-wing pipeline outnumber their counterpart, fulfilling the same misdirection by absorbing negative nationalism. While misrepresenting the left as woke as a form of derangement, it represented a movement for self-awareness among minorities regarding the racist absurdities of that time. All the while, they are propping up a false idol from the same Masonic fervour [old state cults] that has the scope and mindset to fulfil a fascist movement. To them [state-cults], either polarising extreme does not matter.

Our language often conditions us to need to understand the true nature of the world and its patterns. In reality, we exist harmoniously with the external world as a synchronistic whole. Our limited perspective arises from our tendency to filter out anything that does not seem immediately relevant to our conscious awareness. However, it’s essential to recognise that you, as a complete individual, are more than just this momentary awareness. You are an integral part of a larger pattern. Your existence is not merely transient or destined to repeat its end; instead, you are involved in an interconnected event that plays a crucial role in the whole. Theosophy can help foster this sense of wholeness by enhancing our understanding of dimensions through the Monad scheme.

Superpowers – Magic; Monads and Dimensions: Theosophy is about the philosophy of consciousness, not forms, bodies, etc. It involves having an open mind, paying attention to the development aspects of consciousness, and standing apart from the viewpoint of evolution through form. Getting rid of ‘objective identification’ and believing that the outer sense is all there is taking the literal meaning of theosophy to a stifled state. Those who do will never understand the transcendental nature of what H.P. Blavatsky teaches.

To understand dimensions and spiritual consciousness, you must approach it on a musical scale. This can help define the “Monad” with meaning and imagery, comparing the progression of spiritual consciousness to the progression of musical octaves. The collective people go through their own process of spiritual consciousness evolution; the higher the spiritual growth, the higher the octave within the musical scale/dimensions.

The standard definition of the “monad” is the “primary unit” or “ultimate unit,” a form of mathematical (source) coding. The “monad” is a term H.P Blavatsky popularised along with William Q; they judge the term “Monad” as the application of the two highest “principles” of the inner, spiritual constitution of the human being, namely Atma and Buddhi, which are usually, termed the seventh and sixth principles of man. Atma, being pure eternal Spirit, one with the Absolute Infinite Omnipresent Divine Principle, can effectively have no connection with or influence on anything differentiated, manifested, or conditioned, except through Buddhi, the Spiritual Soul, which serves as the vehicle through which the divine light and radiance of Atma shines through to Manas, the following highest Principle that is our Reincarnating Ego, our permanent individuality, the Mind-Entity or Human Soul.

In Occultism every qualitative change in the state of our consciousness gives to man a new aspect, and if it prevails and becomes part of the living and acting Ego [not merely the personality – Martin Euser], it must be (and is) given a special name, to distinguish the man in that particular state from the man he is when he places himself in another state (Blavatsky). It seems to me very easy, on the contrary, once that you have seized the main idea, i.e., that man acts on this or another plane of consciousness, in strict accordance with his mental and spiritual condition. But such is the materialism of the age that the more we explain the less people seem capable of understanding what we say. Divide the terrestrial being called man into three chief aspects, if you like, and unless you make of him a pure animal you cannot do less. Take his objective body; the thinking principle in him – which is only a little higher than the instinctual element in the animal – or the vital conscious soul; and that which places him so immeasurably beyond and higher than the animal-i.e. his reasoning soul or “spirit.” (The key to theosophy)

.

According to theosophy, the psychological key to man, it asks, ‘What is the faculty of man’? ‘What is the composite constitution of man’? It is essentially between ‘us’ and the Universe, the notion of ‘what is above is below’ (Hermetic axiom); it is the spiritual-material model of man. Matter as a crystallised spirit as rarefied matter, in theosophy terms. Spirit and matter are ultimately states (manifestations) of One Principle, which is the One Life force. Science recognises the fact that matter and force are convertible into one another. The perennial wisdom adds that this applies to the psychic and spiritual realms. Old thought forms can be dissolved, and the frozen can be liberated and used in new forms. (Martin Euser, 20007)

*	The circles within the egg-scheme symbolize so-called ‘monads’: sparks of the universal life-force. These are pure Spirit. The monads act as foci or knots for the stream of consciousness, that flows from the Supreme Spirit or Logos (the “Word”) at the top of our hierarchy (= most spiritual level in our hierarchy) down to the ‘grosser’ states of consciousness-matter.
*	We all have a ray of the Supreme Spirit in us, and this provides a way to find the path within, a way to place one’s consciousness in more subtle states of matter within our hierarchy (sphere of life). See referenced document, where the topic of the Supreme Spirit or Supreme Self or Silent Watcher is treated in the context of the egg-scheme, the seven jewels of wisdom, and, initiations.
*	Let me add here, that all this stuff has nothing to do with escaping reality since the spiritual planes or spheres are already present in us here and now, and it is only a matter of recognition of this fact that will help us to open our mind to these spheres, influences, within ourselves and learn to give expression to these energies! In order to manifest themselves, these monads need to make use of a dual pair of organized consciousness-matter. This dual pair is split up in the egg-scheme at the left-hand side (vehicular aspect = ‘soul’, carrier of consciousness) and at the right-hand side (Ego or centre of consciousness).
*	Each ego in this scheme expresses the evolved faculties of the corresponding ego-emanating monad. The divine ego expresses far more faculties than the personal ego. Likewise, we as persons have evolved more qualities of consciousness than the animal monad, which forms a necessary part of our constitution. We need it and, of course, our body in order to express ourselves in this world. The arrows pointing to the various monadic centres indicate the fact that these centres have developed self-consciousness. The animal soul has not yet done that. It follows blindly the impulses and suggestions given to it by the personality.
*	One’s personal consciousness is centred in one’s personal ego. The following table shows in a nutshell some of the developed qualities of consciousness of the diverse monads. (Martin Euser, 2007)

.

Divine Monad: The Divine Monad is about the Inspiration of Unity-consciousness, and the spiritual monad is about our inner god or higher self. This monad’s range of consciousness encompasses all the planes (inner and outer) of our galaxy, the Milky Way. (Martin Euser, 2007)]. There is truth in the notion of our consciousness being part of a collective plane. However, the Inclusion of Galaxies and the Milky Way in an intellectual approach gives it less Validity. The Big Bang approach is in the realms of Scientism falsity; you will find more truth in Genesis and Astrology. As a foundation along with the Zetetic teaching, this is a better fit for the divine monad. The spiritual monad: enlightenment-principle (the understanding of intuition, Buddhi, also known as the (holy) guardian Angel, these ranges of consciousness adhering to the solar system.  These need to be revised, as satellization in a Galileo model is a false one. The planets are moon-like celestials that traverse the same way the moon and sun do under the firmament.  This monad, which forms the basis of the divine monad, is exclusive to the heavenly world, space not being a macro but a finite second heaven as described in Genesis. We must realise that we live in an enclosed system to grasp an authentic world, a stage of human beings. Then, these two monads can have an absolute spiritual line of evolution of the human being.   

Higher human monad: The higher human monad is about vitality, emotion, the higher aspect of thinking and theunderstanding faculty.  It acts as the parent of the personal monad; in the range of consciousness, itpertains to all the planes of the earth, more so over the physical world alone. The higher human ego and the higher human soul together can be called a ‘son of mind’; in Sanskrit, it is called Manasaputra (mana is mind, Putra means son); this is the noetic mind (higher Manas) that’s been developed to such a large degree. This being is said to have sparked the human thinking organ of the human being aeons ago. Remember that the notion of fire differs from what we otherwise understand today. We see fire as terrestrial, but fire for the noetic being/mind is more elemental.

The Prometheus myth is closely associated with the higher human monad; this ancient Greek myth is about Prometheus stealing the sacred fire from the Gods of Olympus, giving it to humanity, and being punished for it. Through further theosophical study, we can make the parable of Prometheus a hidden meaning that can be better understood. Prometheus’s having the sacred fire can be considered the faculty and power of thinking about the nature of fire. Epimetheus, the brother of Prometheus, can be viewed as the infant of humanity with its thinking faculty in an un-evolved state. Prometheus symbolises the inner Manasaputra (the higher human ego); Prometheus is chained to a rock: the Manasaputra is synchronistic and in-tuned to the earth’s plain but has its grid. The in-between of the Gods and the human kingdom, another way to view this is in the crucified Christ event, where one of the penitents describes that his punishment of condemnation is just because it corresponds to their crimes, he said [“this man has done nothing criminal.” ⁴² Then he said, “Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.” ⁴³ He replied to him, “Amen I say to you today you will be with me in Paradise.” 23:39-43] this scenario is the recognition of his Father in Heaven (the Manasaputra is a Christos, baptised with the spiritual light of the spiritual monad) as his parent monad and intermediary to divine spheres of being. Through theosophy, the crucifixion story is a literalisation of the event of a Fourth-degree initiation, symbolised in the form of drama-play in the Ancient Mystery Cults of Greece. In further elaboration, Prometheus may be an archetypal image of Jehovah. 

Prometheus’ liver being picked out by an eagle is explained through esoteric terms; it has to do with passion, the eagle with the activated thinking faculty active in the Element of Air (the element of communication in alchemical symbolism).  The main consensus through the interpretation of this symbol is the transformation of the passions (kamamanas or desire-thinking).  Another way to describe it … is the evolvement of the noetic mind, not the cortical intellect (but its servant – beware of arrogance, cynicism and scepticism: the characteristics of one-dimensionally evolved intellect). The Manasaputra (“Prometheus”) was made to suffer for his connection with the particular human being because Prometheus projected a part of his consciousness onto them; the human being, the personality, is so immersed in gross passions in the psychic world. This being of light is then affected like a parent suffers when their child makes a mess of their life. The Prometheus myth is a symbol for the second line of the evolution of the human being: the evolution of Manas.  

.

.

Mystics & Artist-Prophets:

.

---

.

Superpowers—Blavatsky Chooses Heaven over the Earth: Blavatsky is one of these [artist-mystics] elites who can bring spirits down to earth. She was beyond your average spiritualist of that time, especially in New York. She was a magician rather than a medium—she didn’t allow her body to be used as a tool for messaging between the spirit worlds. Instead, she commands the spirits and makes these things happen.

She continued to work by the end of her life; Blavatsky, however, had fallen victim to a cancel culture of her time alongside being portrayed as a plagiariser and charlatan, but those remarks didn’t faze her all that much. A particular friend became resentful of Blavatsky’s success; her friend gave some letters outlining how they would hoodwink people to some Christian missionary magazine. What did bother her was being rumoured to be a Russian spy. Blavatsky wasn’t dependent on their family’s money. She had always earned her keep by being a magazine writer or creating her own ink business – she had a progressive or blue-collar mindset. She’s the opposite of someone like Crowley, who was dependent on family’s money, a position whose likeness engulfed upper-class capitalistic fervour – she neither delved into these types of hand-outs nor (sexual) ritual debaucheries.     

Today, debaucheries (in the form of abuse, rape and harassment) are made public through allegations implicating anyone high in authority from politicians and celebrities, and as we discussed in the last post concerning our fondness for the arts in particular pop/rock/hip-hop/r&b songs are not made by the familiar artist you thought you knew, but by an embedded spirit in the form of an old man. Of course, the old man in Under the Silver Lake parallels the Matrix’s Architect, a personification of the Demiurge.

The embedded old man is a symbolic subconscious suggestion that implies your imaginative faculty can be controlled. We also concluded this is a fallacy because intuition and imagination are like water in a vast ocean, purely a natural force too large to grasp and control. And even if you tried, we can see this analogy in the sea of algorithmic [adaptive] information where data are collected to be dispensed for market value – this is a type of control over our minds. However, given how water is fungible, your intuition and imagination are also fluid – and given how intuition works in real-time as a function of need in a limited time. Jung states:

Intuition seeks to discover possibilities in the objective situation – It also an instrument which, in the presence of a hopelessly blocked situation, works automatically towards the issue, which no other function could discover

.

The old man represent Control, and in Star Trek discovery season two the main antagonist was Control an artificial intelligence – in Stargate we have the replicaters. In both examples their function is to be an allegorical representation for authoritarian and dominance. Our problem stems from our symbiotic relationship with [information/other] technology that permits or integrates our intuition with civilisation, but has limits concerning our affairs. For the moment this is not how it’s envisioned because the conspiratorial notion that’s it’s going to overrun us is too high in that these technocratic elites is going to succeed with their enterprise of transferring consciousness to A.I adaptive machines. It’s a conflict between reality and the way we pretend to manage reality. We can break away from this approach towards a defeatist future if we build a space for our intuition to exist. We start by limiting the romanticism of conspiratorial appeal towards managers of perception.     

There is also a clear difference between A.I adaptive behaviours and intuitive acts, Jung’s notion of inherited thought patterns is contrasted against A.I Adaptive behaviours – and that is A.I go nowhere because the collective unconscious cannot be derived from ones and zeros. Thought patterns require a bio-genetic component integrating biology and technology, which can only be accurate in fiction. The mineral and the bio are external components that feed data to machines, including A.I in computers, these are the facts bound to rationality for the moment, and maybe forever, meaning unchangeable.

In the Tree of Life, Intuition is Binah or Saturn, and it’s no surprise Binah is also known as the Great Sea or the Mother Supernal. Saturn is also a [celestial] gateway. What it all points to is that intuition is like a delivery system for Gnosis or the spark for the divine. And we know that Sophia recognised in her [progeny] mistake in the form of the Demiurge [creator-God], who creates a material world despite his banishment. She confessed her sin to the other lights of the Aeons, and then she implanted seeds of divinity from the source that would grow into her mistake’s creation. Having had this infusion, they can now escape from the torture of life on earth. Of course, there are distinctions between gnostic groups, especially among Sethian and Valentian. One [Sethian] sees the creator as a wilful or [Satanic] creator, while Valentian sees Him as merely imperfect and acting out of ignorance. The words of Christ are the word of Gnosis – we know the Greek for Gnosis is knowledge [divine knowledge] that is saved.  

Regarding Blavatsky and her intuition, it is clear that she possessed extensive textual knowledge and a solid common sense understanding. This means she was adept at analytic and rational thought with the precise instrumental structures below reason. Blavatsky demonstrated the ability to explore the astral plane by focusing her concentration. It is essential to recognise that she had a unique psychological insight, which can be described as a “superpower.” While she was indeed “talented,” this is evident in her ability to integrate her skills with a doctrine that paralleled her interests in materialistic science, all while navigating the challenges posed by the solid Christian theology of her time. She did not react defensively to these challenges but often anticipated and addressed scientific ideas before they became main-stream.

Although Blavatsky’s first focus was on the Western Esoteric Tradition with deep familiarity with Hermeticism, Kabbalah, and Masonry, her first book, Isis Unveiled [1877], is a long, discursive study of these themes. She had beaten the scientist to the punch because she had already immersed herself in these Western traditions. For example, the esoteric notion found in the Secret Doctrine:

The Eternity of the Universe in toto as a boundless plane … ‘the playground of numberless Universes incessantly manifesting and disappearing.’ –    Blavatsky

.

Through Blavatsky’s statement, you can see where hyperreal science [scientism] invokes an infinite universe. As we know, astronomy and physics are quantifying universe language based on maths. Still, it’s a debasement on natural science as astronomy-physics [and hyperreal-space] is all but theoretical, professing itself as fact. Blavatsky’s quote is far more ambiguous – it’s more about how behind these [planets] planes lies an Absolute “an Omnipresent. Eternal, Boundless, and Immutable Principle,” – which manifests in dual form, as “Spirit” and “Matter”; the interplay of these two forces causes all things to be.

Dee and Bruno imparted a less evolved interpretation of the universe that was later refined through heliocentric academics. The Aristotelian model had to be discarded in favour of misaligning our centre. It was a spell crafted on materialistic pseudo-celestial language to dispel the spirit and prop up sub-atomic particles to act like cosmic solar systems or vice versa. Of course, this inference came from Blavatsky’s abstract; her notion did not discard the soul or cosmic gods that abstract is about involution and evolution.  Of course, evolutionists borrowed from this concept. She states: “All of existence is taking part in the enormous cycle of descent of Spirit into Matter and its eventual return to the bosom of the Absolute.           

I’ve stated that it might have been a mistake for her to combine occult traditions with the emerging materialistic science of her time, which became more pseudo in our present time. The pseudo would streamline aspects of physics (meta-physics), astrophysics, astronomy, and evolution; that’s not to say all these subjects have no relation to truth. Instead, they’re like a subset of subjects that are inferior regarding an esoteric past but may have a better fit in modernity when building rationality for facts. These subset subjects, however, have an imperfection in the process in which they identify themselves as factual or non-fiction but inherently proceed to become more fiction but unrecognised within traditional myth or even meta-fiction (apocryphal truths).        

Blavatsky would not have predicted this imperfection. Nevertheless, she had the imagination to keep the fluidity of competing abstracts of that time. She had imagined the other and placed herself within their language, and from those competing swirling forces, she could conceive her place within the whole. Henri Bergson, an early-twentieth advocate for intuition, reinforces this idea with his quote:

We Grasp at the same time how the two are opposed and how they are reconciled. – Henri Bergson

.

In this form of imagining the whole, she must decide and act—it’s an action that is not rational, beyond common sense (or shared knowledge), and free of memory. This is the intuitive act. You can also say it’s that gnostic spark, the gift given from Sophia [wisdom], trying to grasp where it is and where it wants to be.   

As Eastern tradition found itself on the waning end of popularity, at the same time Western conventional Christianity was on the back foot of a rising materialistic science, she repackaged the rejected Western tradition of esoteric occult knowledge and the philosophy of Hermeticism, Kabala, and Rosicrucianism. Alongside her trip to India, she popularised a version of Eastern tradition in the West.

The secret groups that flourished in Bavaria, like Rosicrucianism and Illuminati, were Protestant groups in protest against the Jesuits of the time. It has become, in the modern West, at least among Christian Conspiracy Circles –organisations that are part of a worldwide conspiracy. Not only did these secret groups last until the eighteenth century, but they were also formulations made famous in the late 90s when gaining truth became like a romantic hero’s journey. This scapegoating or blame-shifting ran superfluous as the question of whether the fraternity existed [especially Rosicrucianism] – like an earnest lawyer ready to impart guilt when empirical and actual doubt is prominent; the truth cannot be buried. However, according to researchers, ‘yes’ Rosicrucian fraternities existed [although they only have the three Confessio Pamphlets as evidence]. However, modern Rosicrucians have no direct link to any early secret Rosicrucian society of the early seventeenth century. [Richard Smoley said just because there is no proof does not mean there is no link].

It became an entertaining pastime as most accusations couldn’t hold the truth. In modernity, this CFCT and traditional Christians only show their hand in contradictions. Perhaps it was a product of time; the awareness of a Globalized New World Order now in collapse needed to attach itself to the villain role, and because most of the enthusiasm came from fundamentalist Christians, the villain must have an esoteric or occult link. Their religiosity of Christendom and reason for existence is because of the protestant Christian enterprise. Their villain is responsible for their existence. The protestant Christian enterprise was also in protest of the Church, which CFCT also despised. Today, we know not to rely on these demoralised Christians, easy to manipulate, Lacking discernment, unable to detach them-selves from agenda-driven Network News, prone to follow or hero-worship a demagogue – unaware of a fascist movement on their doorstep urged on by their own demoralisation.

Intellectuals have all indicated that being vulnerable to a demagogue was the symptom or consequence that has been plaguing America’s marginalised population for quite a long time. Their ignorance is beyond ridiculous as most of their knowledge is derived from memes, often short-lived, biased and propaganda-based. The difference between memes and archetypes has never been so significant to recognise. Modern propaganda in the political landscape on both sides, seen through a top-down hierarchy, indicates a Navy Militancy and military-industrial alongside an intelligence agency with the national security running the show over governance and billionaires. Yet all institutions seemingly aligned regarding astrology, rituals and star magic) are highly informed by their paid sibyls, oracles, and guides – on the reassurance that the stars comfort them and that the gods are backing their particular righteous cause. There is a strange parallel among the ruling elites and accelerationism for civilisation to fall through technology and governance matches Christian fundamentalist bemusement on their Christian apocalyptic end time; for both it needs to happen.     

Blavatsky and Theosophy were consolidated within a Christian conspiracy setting stemming from the same reactive conspiratorial concern. Often regulated to subjects discussing occult philosophy and magical spiritual Western traditions have many associations or influences from Rosicrucians. Even in that case, you would have to make the connections between every initiated and non-initiated Globalist member and what they hold in a metaphysical sense. Masonry is not Rosicrucianism, although it mimics the same or a variation of initiation path. Blavatsky said that members of Rosicrucianism must study a scheme of initiation into the Kabbalah and higher magic of the Western or hermetic type. Often, there was a substantial membership test with two-thirds failing upon trial because she said, “the Rosy-Crux becomes and is not made” – meaning, you have to put a lot of effort before entry to the membership. In other words, there needs to be a prerequisite for superpowers.      

It’s like assuming the culprit’s likeness for a particular song in contrast to each different religiosity, so, therefore, you must be part of a worldwide agenda even though you’re far apart and your only link is in likeness to religiosity or to a particular song. Top religions are similar but never really follow the same method. This reactive concern may be caused by past Rosicrucian and Theosophical members taking what they learnt and particularising it to their own ideological, often fantastical sect. This is a concern that these masters may not have envisioned for their students. Writers like Baily, Crowley, Hubbard, etc., are examples that can cause concern.

After Blavatsky passed away, theosophy would become splinted, and the concern made about theosophy is apparent, but made after her death. By this time, the society had been splintered into several groups. And you can determine that Blavatsky, with her intuition and unmatched imagination, would not have approved or followed such a debasement to her work. Remember, she had consolidated Occult magical philosophy with its emphasis on the imagination/intuition alongside cosmic mapping (an Illuminati heliocentric cosmology & evolution of her time), and Eastern mysticism has a particularity on establishing old grounds made new – alongside her intuition, imagination, and emotions produced a new set ideas and thoughts. By this alone, it’s clear she chooses heaven over the earth.

Superpowers – The Search for the Vril Force via Blood, Sugar, and Sex-Magic: This debasement to her work would lean into a modern concern related to an “esoteric agenda.” Theosophy was not helped by a German secret society named Vril, founded at the end of the First World War – whose members were known to be part of the Nazi regime. A dark fellowship of members that wanted to achieve the mastery of the Aryan race – of course, before these members became part of Vril, the society was about Aryan power but had nothing to do with any Nazi white/race ideology. Nevertheless, the methods in which Vril ran things garnered the attention of the Nazis. It ranged from political assassinations by invoking the spirit of the dead to sexual rituals and sacrifices.

There is an obsession with an intangible power force called “Vril.” This power was said to be a universal force that can heal and extend superpowers’ likeability. In many ways, a parallel spiritual concept of Prana or Chi, and it’s understood they could harness this energy force, and gaining it would also grant them the ability to acquire material power. They first used sex magic rituals as a means to find this force – this carnal method of trying to harness Vril didn’t have the effect they wanted. It did influence a nationwide coitus program of infidelity in which an increased population size was developed to make for the loss of soldiers in the war. They believed children were closer links to spiritual forces and saw them as gateways to the astral world. As a result, marginalized kids from the edges of Bavarian society “suddenly” started to disappear.      

Of course, we know Vril came from a science-fiction novel, “The Coming Race” – Edgar Burroughs wrote this concept. The books describe an underground race named Vrilya, who completely masters the Vril (electro-fluid) force. It was science fiction, but it is derived from a symmetrical aspect of fiction, meta-fiction, which you would find in Apocryphal texts. Its apparent elements of Nazi ideology stem from Burroughs Vril’s novel – the superior race in connection with the Aryan race manifested in the Nazi mindset. From here, the Vril society was born, ranging from a collection of occultists and High German-ranking nationalists to an inner circle called “the all-German Society for Meta-Physics” in short, the Vril-Society.    

Founders of the Vril, one in particular, adopted a messiah complex as one went by John the Baptist – John being the first template of the true messiah to come. A saviour complex where they believed they alone could save a country – they involved female mediums in their groups tasked with uncovering occult truths and harvesting Vril. They foresaw a dark shadow, a leader who would wear the name of Fuhrer, a megalomaniac who would lead the country. This leader would eventually be part of the inner circle, although he would see it only as a tool to give him rise as an established leader. Aside from that, it was the introduction of Jorg Lanzvon Liebenfels, whose concept and writings of the debased version of Theosophy known as Ariosophy that instilled this (anti-Semitic) propaganda to the world.

Between 1888 and the 1920s, it was a time of secret societies and spiritualism spreading throughout Europe. Mystics like Blavatsky had an impact with her prolific work that would later be centred on Theosophy (a combination of science and religion). Liebenfels misconstrued her notion of a superior Aryan race as a propaganda piece. Her Aryan race was centred on the Indo-Aryan race, meaning Noble, which evolved further spiritually than other races. By this time, it was too late. The misrepresentation took hold. It is said the secret doctrine had sold more copies in Germany. The Nazi regime even followed Blavatsky’s quest by travelling to Tibet as they believed the Aryan forefathers were deep under the Himalayan Mountains. They found out that this enterprise, one of many, would weaken the country’s finances. Nonetheless, they acquired something from the country, the Tibetan Swastika symbol, and imposed a debasement on the original imagery while appointing their new meaning onto it.

This was a time of secret societies; many dissipated, and some became subsets. Its well-known project paper clip was established where groups of Nazi scientists had a get a jail-free card for establishing the needs of the CIA. The Nazis had their own UFO project establishing a nuts-and-bolt version of flying saucers. America saw itself as wanting to reach space, and this would lead to the Rocket program that Jack Parsons had a hand in. Parsons had associations with Crowley. Both were part of a sex cult. This project leans into the practical side of a subset version of that alchemical dream that the Illuminati Council had established in heliocentrism – this time, the practical side of that dream would come to fruition – the idea to conquer space became real.      

Superpowers – The Hyperreal Cosmos Meme-Math Magic: We’ve established that Blavatsky is a magician with psychic abilities and profound knowledge and intuition – although she wasn’t inherently prophetic, she was more mystical and practical. It’s helpful in terms of what she had put down on paper. Blavatsky seems among the last non-members yet deeply inspirational among the Illuminati Council that laid out the cosmology and anthropology that are universally revered and still seen today (the heliocentric cosmos).

What can be folded into this Illuminati Council that redefined the current cosmology from flat land to a spherical one started from Bruno’s psychedelic assumption that stars are Suns, basically, at the death end of the alchemical dream and beginnings of Rosicrucian movements who had the desire to bring about a religious, moral and social revolution based on hermetic philosophy. The Rosicrucian movement is a re-emergence of the same alchemical dream that died but was made new in a different order. Still, it was not founded by Hermeticism this time but through Bruno’s false assumption, a protestant subset. It would instigate a Galileo worldview that will last until to this day – this subset became more materialistic science and more masonic. The world became about spheres, planets, solar systems, and galaxies – and in modernity, black holes, galaxies, and dark matter, the heavens became (a hyperreal) space. The current worldview has come to realise this subset’s apparent malarkey dysfunction, which is counterintuitive to actual science.  

Aside from semantic details regarding flatness, curvature, transfixed Earth vs. rotating Earth, the star-constellation & celestial movement, etc., the spirit’s main ascendance to higher forms of monads is in parallel. This notion of infinity is the first fundamental proposition or spell that was enchanted. In a hyperreal space model, they had to dislodge Earth’s universal centre and swap it with the sun.  

The Rosicrucian methodology still took most of its ideas from Aristotelian Physics 300 centuries before Christ. The Aristotelian universe is about structuring the cosmos into concentric spheres with the earth at the centre. The Kabbalah system was also about spheres, though more of an internal approach. At around the same time (give or take a century), there was Mesopotamia of Alexandra/Agora, a mathematician who had tackled the question of the earth/sun centre of the universe. The film starring Rachel Weisz called Agora suggests she did do so. Of course, there is no proof of this. There are only indicators towards the fact. Ptolemy heavily influenced Hypatia and Eratosthenes’s works. Her work, which entails a review of Appolonius on Conics (about circles and eclipses), also edited a new edition of Ptolemy’s Algemist, which indicates she would have at least approached the idea.  

The film imparted she came up with the elliptical orbits through a moment of clarity upon looking at the conics (geometries that can be derived from the cone). Still, that information would’ve been available to begin with. So can a parabola (u-shaped curve), which is a ball’s path, describe when you throw it?  Put the Sun at the centre of the Solar System, and suddenly, you can use the same basic ideas to describe motion anywhere in it. Once elliptical orbits were proposed in the seventeenth century, progress in motion study followed quickly. In the film, this revolutionary possibility is represented by Hypatia doing experiments by dropping a sack from the mast of a moving ship. However, this experiment is merely about forces (f=mv2/f=mv2/r), linear, and angular speeds. Angular speeds allow dropping a sack from the mast of a moving ship the possibility of moving earth when it combines speed and momentum. The transfixed quality of the world is still present; the ship does not suddenly become the earth. 

Math is not reality; math is a language; “the things we assume to be true in math are called axioms, and a hypothesis we come up with isn’t more likely to be true if it better explains or predicts what we observe. Instead, it’s true because we say it is,” For example, one can create an equation where an elephant can hang on to a cliff holding on to a single branch, and math can say this is possible; reality knows better, though. Math can be derived in many ways to show something – the illusion of truth or truth, depending on your beliefs. – Vsauce, “How to count past Infinity (video).”   

How does one measure something unmeasurable? They do it by building collections or languages of things. Also, by thinking of infinity as a set size of numbers and comparing infinity to other infinities, you do it by taking a size set and putting a number on it; each set size is known as cardinality (Georg Cantor method). This method eventually gets to a point where set theory must ask: can there be a universe of all-sets when there are no sets of all-sets? They add additional axioms but are bounded by a too-large set (infinity without measure so large it’s immeasurable even in standard AI/quantifying computer level). So, they make a cut-off point and measure only more minor things.

In philosophical terms, trying to measure the reach of God from the backdrop of their infinity hypothesis is impossible. Astro-Gnostics answered this problem by advocating the centre of the hyperreal universe is the entrance or the Pleroma. Trying to pass our stratosphere is also impossible. So you enclose it, or you flatten it. You get to a place where infinity can be measured only at a microcosm level. If any underlining data or math is still left over from the hyperreal, you can use the Cantor method to eliminate unwanted infinities.   

The certainty of continuum hypotheses (possible sizes of infinite sets) is that they will never be realised, and you will never know whether they are true or false. The hypotheses are not sufficient enough to know one way or the other. A scene in Agora where the Roman stewards were scattering to save scrolls and books and the amounts of data they had accumulated regarding astronomy bear no significance. Astronomy/Astrophysics have become or always been, but not realised due to the misconceptions of that era; nonetheless, pseudoscience now and has always been. 

	Rose and the Cross
	Nicolaus Copernicus		Formulated the Copernican principle – that said the earth and human beings cannot possibly be in the privilege position in the universe.
	Giordano Bruno		Stars are just like other Suns
	Galileo Galilei		Pushed the idea of Heliocentrism
	Johannes Kepler		Came up with mathematical laws of planetary motion
	Isaac Newton		Came up with Gravity
	Christiaan Huygens		Calculated through proposed axiom the distance from earth to the Sun

.

When I discuss folding the Rosicrucians into the Illuminati Council, I refer to this new emergence of the dead alchemical dream that Dee initiated. A protestant subset of the Rosicrucian order involved gathering these renascence thinkers and gestating a seed of doubt that would grow ever more sophisticated in their mathematical language. That lasted through the Reformation, into the Enlightenment, and then to modernity. Bruno and Newton gave more credence to other works, such as Bruno’s geometry of language and Newton’s work on enneagrams. They are still part of this subset.

A subset that influenced other thinkers into the modern fray, only to come up to a dead end or, in mathematical terms, a cut-off point, meaning the circuit of return comes rushing back to its source. Centuries of data are gained, and nothing definitive is answered because nothing in their field uses the scientific method. They use leaps of logic or guesswork. Having seeded that doubt for five hundred centuries and engrained in our memories and genetics, the need to disenchant the demoralised on their alchemical spell will take work and persistence. The backlash would ultimately be about questioning the topography of the earth but ultimately about upholding the death ropes of a redefined alchemical Protestant dream.  

The implication is that this must be a Jesuit Plot. However, given that Father George Lemaitre, a Jesuit priest, came up with the Big Bang Theory, this is an unlikely claim. They are all in it together. During the Reformation, there was an endeavour to implement a heliocentric view, but the Jesuit contributions came after the re-emergence of the dead alchemical dream made new in the Illuminati Council of the Rose and the Cross—now, in modern scientism.

From here on end, there is an attempt to grasp magical thinking with quantification and mathematics, which leads to nowhere because magic/mysticism and science should not mix; alchemists knew that’s why they had categorical subjects within the alchemical workings (the lab; the spirit, and the psychology). They should not mix, but is there room for intuition in science? There is since animism is a great defender of science and science for animism – that is, if science stops bedding with scientism.  

	Masonic
	Father; George Lemaitre		Came up with the Big Bang Theory
	Henry Cavendish		Came up with the mass and weight of the earth
	Max Plank		Originator of Quantum theory
	Albert Einstein		Came up with relativity and the bending of space-time
	Lawrence Krauss, Michio Kaku (string theory), Steven Hawking, Richard Feynman, Max Bourne, Dawkins, etc.

.

Mathematics and sciences are designed to explain the reality of hyperrealism and are made towards your conscious reality to lock you down. While mainstream religion locks down your subconscious, God being the infinite all there is which can be seen as the allegory for your subconscious. Making the conscious the finite and the subconscious the infinite, where both finite/ infinite subconscious are sold back to you by these elite managers of perception. Mathematics has an artistic quality to it; it’s just sometimes engendered towards an agenda, and just like the entertainment business, there is a balance between the imaginative commitment and their grant holders. 

Hermetic understanding equates planetary divinities with lineages of their chain of being from the celestial world down to the material world, like the Sun’s connection to Gold and all the other planets. So, when you look at the phenomenal world, you start to see things from that perspective. You begin to see these divine lineages working or weaving through material reality. If you want to work with a divine form, choose its extensions into this world. In order to truly grasp it, you need to take your position that’s been dislodged back to the centre.      

Blavatsky once said: “the progressive development of everything, Even Atoms, is taught.” Even atoms are taught to fold in the quantum world. She meant that the unknown is the source of knowledge where she is being taught (something out there is giving her these sensory informative perceptions) alongside her development of consciousness. This is significant because it matches the same processes as these mathematicians when they come up with their truths. This means people with spiritual access can develop the same spiritual truths; Blavatsky gave the methods to reach these spiritual processes. In the secret doctrine, she proposed three fundamental axioms:

One – there is an absolute reality beyond our conditioning or ability to think about it (beyond comparison). A state of immutability, a state of independence towards the other – or in other words, a centre of poise; mystics also describe it as a god-hood beyond God. Two – The absolute universality of the love periodicity, of flux and reflux, (wax and wane) ebb and flow, which physical science has observed and recorded in all departments of nature. It’s about the cyclical nature of things, death and rebirth, the rise and fall of civilisations, etc. Three – The obligatory pilgrimage for every Soul – a spark of the Universal Over-Soul – through the cycle of Incarnation (or “Necessity”) following Cyclic and Karma law. It’s about transcending the self (experiencing life in a separate form) – my soul reflects this universal principle in my body. That reflection is the principle, the awareness of unity, and you become aware of the whole through raising your consciousness. The spirit must then experience separateness to recognise I am from I am the whole. We can escape the incarnation cycle when we realise the truth of our nature, which is the truth of the universe.

.

Blavatsky’s intuitive ability is like a grandmaster chess player who can imagine several moves ahead and extrapolate from each opponent’s reactionary move. She may not have folded all the defragmented spells of material science and scientism, only those that are partial to magical understanding.

.

.

Mystics & Artist-Prophets:

.

---

.

Superpowers – The Real Madame Web & Theosophy: The timeline of 120 years, following from the 1500s to the beginning of the 30-year war, was a constant effort in parts of Europe to change society forward into a magical revolution. Europe of the 11th and 12th centuries was ruled by scholastic rationalism; witchcraft was unknown and was merely a curiosity or folktale for some. From the 15th and 16th centuries, this tremendous proliferation of magical thinking evolved into systems of magical ideas. Along with it came social hysterias relating to the interest in these magical ideas like witchcraft, alchemy, conjuring, and magic.  

After Rosicrucianism came, a new resurgence of occultism emerged in the New World [New Atlantis]. As we covered in the last post, it was supposed to be a nation where the mystical and metaphysical would garner a new identity—further propelled through several secret societies [like Freemasonry] pursuing a similar scope of the Rose and the Cross. It would be an interpolation of the landscape and a mystical and metaphysical understanding. What is a standard fact is that there was “some kind” of esoteric doctrine that likely had a role in its foundation within the British colonies, which became the United States. Then, the Puritans arrived, along with Protestant Christianity, which would fracture into denominations across the East of America. From the early 16th century to independence in 1776, Freemasonry became less secret as an anti-masonic movement that would sweep the nation by the 1820s.  

We must remind ourselves Rosicrucianism embodies the ideal of protestant-Christianity alongside a parallel ideologue of [pseudo] science like [the solar martyr] Bruno’s heliocentric idea. This pseudo-understanding of the cosmos would dominate the Western world and introduce other pseudo-ideas like evolution. By the early 1870s, New York and most of the country except maybe for the Bible belt, along with a rising movement of spiritualism and Eastern mysticism [thanks to theosophy], most had accepted this pseudo-materialistic understanding.   

In 1873, in rural New York, two sisters, Lea and Margret Fox, declared that they contacted spirits beyond the grave by using the technique called séance. Those groups became more popular when a Russian-born woman by the name of Madam Blavatsky arrived in New York and became the figurehead of the spiritualism movement. Later, she became a leading authority in ancient occult secrets. She grew up in an occult world where her father had already established a collection of occult libraries. She saw the connections between different cultures and spiritual teachings and was tempted to correct the errors in Christianity by bringing in mysticism and spirituality from other cultures.

She popularised occultism into a worldwide movement when she founded the Theosophical Society [an esoteric spiritual organisation Blavatsky started in 1875 in New York]. Several members of the society would continue the work on occultism on their own, authoring their works. Blavatsky was born in Ukraine in 1831 into a family of nobility, and at around 17/18, she ran away from an unconsummated marriage with an older man. For the next twenty years, she wandered the world in search of mystic knowledge. Before that, she was fascinated by the occult library that her great-grandfather had. Her great-grandfather was part of a secret society called Russian Freemasonry in the late 18th century. They had a political side, a transformative vision of Europe, and a utopian progressive society. It was a group preoccupied with overthrowing the Church and the monarchy of the time. She was fascinated by the secret group having secret knowledge, these masonic laws and mysterious high-ranking figures having a hand in society.        

As a child, Blavatsky claimed she had strange otherworldly experiences like visions, encounters with spirits, and memories of past lives. On some occasions, these types of spirits acted as guardians. There was a time as a child when she put her own life in danger so that these spirits would save her life from these possible accidents that would have otherwise killed her. She didn’t understand what these spirits were until she was an adult. By then, she recognised that these spirits were not spirits but the actions of these psyche Hindu masters. She would later travel around the world trying to seek these masters out. 

She later met these mysterious masters when she visited India and saw them in person. Upon getting to know them, she referred to them by their name, Morya and Koot Hoomi. These guys were said to teach her psychic abilities. She stayed in Tibet, studying various spiritual practices and mastering her secret powers. By this time, a lot of controversy surrounded these figures, and Blavatsky herself was fond of producing such phenomena. It is a story in which she had visited her father and brother before settling in New York; her brother was a university student and was sceptical, and rationale he doubted her ability. As a result, Blavatsky points at the coffee table and says, “I can make that so heavy that you won’t be able to lift it” – her brother goes over and picks it up very easily. Then she stared at it with concentration and said, “No” Her brother tried to lift it but was unable to, neither his friend could lift it, both at the same time couldn’t lift it – then she let it go, suddenly it jumped into the air, her brother almost breaking his arm in doing so.       

At this time, ‘spiritualism’ had become a type of craze both in Europe and the United States in the late 1840s, which carried on to the early 1870s. Blavatsky, however, stood apart from that as she was more of a magician than a medium. She had control of things; she wasn’t passively being used as a voice from the spirits of the other side who would come into the mediums and speak to them. She was commanding the spirits. 

She often described this other self as a vivid encounter with her other [or spiritual twin or possession] when she was living with her companion Colonel Olcott, where he described watching her as she was working – and at times claimed that her appearance would change/morph in real-time, changes, from hair to face. Suggests that she had a second personality that she could somehow invoke or allow to manifest in her, and it would write some of the passages. A case study suggested she had used quotes from famous books to which she had no physical access. The story says that she would access these information quotes by gazing at her concentration at a distance – meaning she would see the passages in the astral plane. A technological equivalence to the World Wide Web, but is instead ethereal. These supposed spiritual perceptions were later fact-checked by someone accessing the Vatican Library; her quotes did indeed match. Meaning there is confirmation regarding pre-cognition or psyche abilities.

When we discuss a technological equivalence to the World Wide Web, we are talking about something ethereal, similar to the ether, but closer to the scientific language, which is the magnetic field and its ethereal parallel akashic records. These are where your stories in history are archived, and this field is visually symbolic of the spider’s Web and its weaving. The spider or the spider-man represents Kwaku Anansi [Akan folklore], who connects to the history or his stories by accessing/weaving webs [a.k.a as magnetic fields].

Given that understanding, this makes Madame Blavatsky, Madame Web—the druids say spiders are spiritual guides. In the Spider-Man comics and animations, Madame Webguides Spider-Man to his many different multiverse versions of his spider self.

Weaving spiders goes back to an old Greek myth of an old woman weaver named Arachne who disrespected Athena/Minerva, the goddess of weaving, and failed to acknowledge her – her weaving skills came from the goddess and not from her power. And so Athena/Minerva turned her into a spider as punishment for being Argonaut. Her descendants would have to weave webs forever because she thought she was good at it. This all means or signifies – not to challenge the gods.       

Christian fundamentalist conspiracy theorist [CFCT] groups have positioned theosophy [the secret doctrine] and Blavatsky as part of an esoteric agenda associated with fascism and Nazism. These tropes are often superficial, shallow, and sensational, and they’re usually uninformed of the full contextualisation and comprehension regarding the secret doctrine. There is confusion surrounding the eternal recurrence of the swastika symbol that the right-wing fascists took from her. The truth, as is often the case, is more complicated. Jorg Lanz von Liebenfels and his debased version of theosophy, which is “Ariosophy”, stole the symbol and turned it into something else. She was introducing an ancient symbol to the development of humanity, the Vedic notion of eternal recurrence. She didn’t see it as having any ethnic connotation; she didn’t see it as belonging to any programme of nationalism, and she expressed no such idea at any point in the secret doctrine.          

Even though she was very knowledgeable about occult traditions, her other goal was to create an international brotherhood of humanity. It was a multi-ethnic/racial, multi-faith, pluralistic, and tolerant brotherhood of people, paralleling democratic and liberal attitudes. This came from her intrigue towards her great-grandfather and his Freemasonic roots. A utopian ideal that was spurred by a sense of romanticism, which is a far cry from Masonry today, where it’s about secret agendas, demonic/watcher worship, corporatism, hierarchies and power.

While she had relatives who could tie her into Masonry, she was clearly never part of that group—as her ambition was more about creating an open brotherhood for everyone. Madame Blavatsky/Web is a weaver, and she’s not allowed to be part of the group. The Greek Owl of Athena is a symbol of wisdom. The Romans describe Athena as the Owl of Minerva. There are steps towards the initiation process; Minerva represents the first step for the recruits.         

Spider-man Homecoming was released on 7.7.2017 – the significance of the number seven is no coincidence as it signifies the Greek deity Athena and the Roman deity Minerva, both goddesses of war and city protectors. We have Spider-Man on top of the Obelisk and capstone. This is a symbolic split between the Orion Pyramids and the North Mountain. It’s combination symbol for the great Tree that was once located at the North Mountain centre, where the centre of the magnetic fields radiates. It also represents other pyramids, such as the one found in Egypt. Researchers have claimed these pyramids were set out to be built with links to either cosmic stars or relevant lay-lines.   

Eva Green plays Vanessa Ives, a narrow but more attractive complement to Blavatsky; her portrayal of the Madame and the aesthetics of spiritualism of the 18th century is decent enough. As Ives clasps the spider in her hand, you can see the spider motif, a potent symbolic spider reference for the weaver.

In Post (02) of this thesis collection, we emphasise that Egyptian emblems of Throne, Yan, and Us are also Thanus/Thanos, a Titan god of war who travels in a Q-ship. Thanus/Thanos is Ra with the glove on and Yan without. The number 17, as we know, is the numerical signifier for ‘Q’, which is also the deity for Horus [son of Osiris] or Ra, although Ra is equivalent to Yahweh, creator of the worlds. Bruno was executed in a ritual death on the 17th on ‘Q’ – where Q is the signifier for Horus, and the death ritual is astro-theologically charged. It’s an Osiris/Christ sacrifice of death. Bruno is a solar martyr for Q – he is also a placeholder for the Sun, and the Sun is the first light we see in the Horizon because the Sun moves across the Sky. In alchemy, gold/sol/sun is a circle with a dot in the middle connected to the eye’s symbology. Secret Society Groups put the eye in the middle of the Triangle instead of a circle, changing the dynamic or craft [more on this later].

Trump is a Qanon mythological figure for racist conservative/republicans and Maga/Nazi sympathisers [with the vast majority of them applying for police enforcement roles and tend never to get vetted properly]; he was the clown or the fool in 2016, a joker who plays on the gullibility of Middle America’s intelligence with his Trump Card, which impart himself as heroic figure that will bring down an oligarch while all awhile is part of the same secret establishment. Today, he embodies the clown and the martyr, and when we look into the origins of the joker/clown. The joker started as the red hood reminiscent of the Rubedo from Alchemical iconography. Of course, Trump wears his famous red hat off (hat-red/hatred).    

Rubedo is a Latin word meaning redness that alchemists adopted to define this fourth and final major stage in their magnum opus: the Red Sulfur, the Red Stone, the Red Elixir, and the Philosopher’s Stone. The gold and the philosopher’s stone were associated with red, as Rubedo signalled alchemical success and the end of the great work. Jung understood this idea when he suggested that the living dream state is insufficient. Jung writes, “In the state of ‘whiteness’, one does not live in the true sense of the word. It is a sort of abstract, ideal state. To make it come alive, it must have ‘blood,’ it must have what the alchemists called the Rubedo, the ‘redness’ of life. Rubedo, then, might be described as a permanent psycho-spiritual shift within the client or individual involving the appearance of objectively sensed truths. The most important relates to the relationship between the inner and outer planes, between microcosm and macrocosm or mind and matter.        

As a result, an understanding of the Rubedo speaks to the functions of the Akashic Records, where objectively sensed truths must match an ethereal substantiation of facts. Blavatsky writes about life forms leaving permanent impressions we call Akasha. There is this infinitude of impressions or records like accessible photographic plates or thumbprints that are accessible as the Akashic records. Akashic Records come from Blavatsky; she mentions it in Isis Unveiled. Akasha is these ethereal substances that permeate and enter the material existence and people’s lives; it’s an ancient Vedic concept. Blavatsky says:

It is not the physical organisms that remain in status quo least of all there psychical principals during the great cosmic or even solar cataclysms, but only Akashic or astral photographs. –Blavatsky, Isis unveiled

.

Theosophy introduced a blend of Western and Eastern mysticism, such as Buddhism, which laid the groundwork for what is now known as the New Age movement. This spiritual movement gained popularity in various countries and cities. The Tibetan Book of the Dead, a widely known spiritual text, was compiled by Evans Wentz, a theosophist. Blavatsky’s goal was to bring hermetic philosophy and understanding to the materialistic West and demonstrate the reality of phenomena that occur at séances and spiritualist gatherings. She aimed to explain that these phenomena are not caused by the spirits of the dead but rather by lingering remnants or “shells” of low-level spirits unable to move on, which echo the final events of their lives.

She had envisioned uniting her type of occult vision with the new ideas of evolution and science [which at the time was still radical]. As a result, modern times allowed the wrong aspect of evolution, which is the majority, to have a mystic-rational legitimacy. Perhaps this was a bad choice of Blavatsky’s as overlapping mysticism with science would instil incoherency; it can go two ways: one: dogmatic rationalism [either materialistic or religious] or two: damaging cults of personalities or self-annihilation. Her overall doctrine, however, was still very different to modern materialism.   

Evolution regarding change and process intertwined with occult traditions, examined in the spirits upon death where spirits/souls do not wait in heaven. Our spirit/souls carry on and transform into evolutionary changes – every living thing is part of this vast cosmic universal state of processes. What she was revealing in Isis regarding evolution was adaptive behaviours, which we discussed in the first post of this thesis collection. Moreover, in both volumes of ‘The Secret Doctrine,” she contrasted the science of her time with her writings. She knew what aspects of secret doctrines matched the science of the time and what factors they didn’t. Mainly around the field of physics and less with hyperrealism of [Bruno’s] space cosmos. Also the fundamental principles of quantum physics can be traced back to the teachings found in the secret doctrines.

She authored two massive books, ‘Isis Unveiled’ and ‘Secret Doctrines’, which are the secret teachings of the Eastern Brotherhood, the mystery schools (cults) of initiations, and she altered the spiritual landscape of Western civilizations by introducing those concepts. She pioneered ideas of Eastern esotericism into the West; she focused on the similarities between Christianity and Hinduism, Buddhism and other spiritual traditions, arguing that there is, in fact, a tradition that underlies all spiritual faiths in the world. 

She regarded her work as a spiritual science and made connections between recent scientific advancements and occult beliefs. She promoted the ancient Eastern mystical view that the world’s essential nature was not Matter but Energy, which foreshadowed the discovery of modern physics. She also revived the Eastern beliefs of reincarnation and karma; by this time, she acquired an occult following, which, in turn, led her to launch the Theosophy Society. The term she coined (Theosophy) comes from two words: Theos (God) and Sophia (Wisdom); the society was about teaching divine wisdom. She would then be heralded as the Mother of the New Age.

Blavatsky rose to fame and garnered charisma but ultimately fell victim to her own success. As she became more successful, séances became increasingly popular, and she felt that such events had a sense of charlatan appeal. Blavatsky wanted to distance herself from that image. However, in the end, she was accused of the very thing she was trying to fight against. She was caught faking a séance event by using spring-loaded devices above her chamber, which investigators uncovered. This revelation tainted Blavatsky’s works both before and after her death with fraud. Despite this, Blavatsky still has devoted followers due to her ground-breaking work in synthesising Eastern and Western spirituality and pushing the boundaries of occult history.

Superpowers – Theosophy & its Influence on Pop Culture: Theosophy was a movement that arose from the rise of spiritualism popularised by Blavatsky and when Blavatsky made her way to New York. After spending a while in New York, she returned to India. Afterwards, Theosophy branched out to other institutions; Steiner formed anthroposophy; he also formed a private school called Waldorf, and then there was Lucia’s Trust, formed by Alice Baily. By this time, we are in the 1920s and 1930s. This is where pulp magazines started making their way through numerous printing distributions.           

Pulp magazines were short stories printed on cheap paper. They featured superheroes like the Shadow, considered a prototype of Batman, and Doc Savage. Instead of deriving their abilities from science, these characters drew their powers from the occult. The Shadow travelled to an occult land to learn from initiates and masters, where he honed his psychic abilities. He also journeyed to the occult mountains of China to learn from Zen warriors and monks, studying their fighting style and spiritual philosophy. This story arc is similar to the one in “Batman Begins,” where Bruce Wayne is mentored by Ra’s al Ghul, an intelligent warrior, Eastern mystic and supernatural practitioner.

This desire to explore the exotic and harness its power is fundamental to empire building, with its pursuit of power and immortality. It arises from a fear of death, whether personal or the death of an empire. These early pulp stories from authors like Burroughs and Lovecraft influenced future storytellers. They drew inspiration from occult ideas associated with Lord Bruce. He was driven by a masonic directive based on the belief that Enoch was the first Mason, aiming to establish a new mythos centred on Enoch [read post 36]. Edgar Burroughs’ Vril book commonly explores the theme of the coming race, mirroring Enoch’s depiction of the Watchers in Atlantean mythology.

The book was so popular that in 1871, it led to a significant event-the first science fiction convention, reminiscent of our modern comic con. This convention, known as Vril-Ya Basaar and Fete, was held at the Royal Albert Hall. When theosophy branched out in the 1930s from Steiner to Bailey, a new term emerged to distinguish this evolved form of theosophy from its predecessor neo-theosophy, expounded by Besant. Bailey, however, distinguished herself by claiming that the Watchers were the truly good guys as opposed to the group of Angels Michael led. The question arises whether other personalities or elites of the empire who had a hand in progressing civilization were part of that worship to begin with. Given Bailey’s positioning herself to ally with fallen angels, it birthed the modern conspiracy theorists’ disposition of Luciferianism and, to some extent, Satanism.

Was this the new spark [or the beginning] of worshipping dark forces, where they would shed their mystical, metaphysical, transcendental, Protestant, and Rosicrucianism enlightenment heritage by adopting a bargain with the fallen ones that would coincide with technology and power? Not entirely, as these pagan worships tie back to medieval Rome alongside many sectarian viewpoints. Presuppositions that you may find in Mithraism regarding rituals, sex, psychedelics, and astrology. Where Mithra/Perseus is destined to escape “time” parallels and expounded later through Rosicrucianism.

Rosicrucian group’s framework is about believing that they were the divine spark in this divine Monad and by contacting the Angels [Kabala] with the hermetic theurgy and through the alchemical and imperial process alongside the understanding of the symbolic scripture – they can then gain knowledge to move closer to the divine one or essence. Even so, at the beginning of the sixteenth century, when Europe marvelled over cryptic manuscripts produced by the Rosicrucians, an “invisible college” of adepts who extolled mysticism and higher learning while prophesying the dawn of a new era of education and enlightenment. There is a question about whether a secret fraternity of Rosicrucians actually existed.

There is no doubt, however, that gaining (metaphysical) experience is separated through personal experience rather than being in a cult. Hence, its ideology sees itself as being separate from the papacy. It saw itself as purely neo-plutonic and with a focus on the Monad. It did away with superstition but kept rationalism, and by the Enlightenment era, it became about the blending of rationalism and superstition. This garnered the interest of former theosophist members like Baily and inspired personalities like Lavey and Crowley that invoked interest from secret cults (of Hollywood Babylon) and celebrities.

We must also remind ourselves of the clear difference between Satanism and Luciferianism; the comparison is as different as oil and water. Both Satan and Lucifer act as an archetype, and it’s easier to see that way as opposed to the other in regard to a culture where popular themes like good and evil have a direct relation to our esoteric notions of angels of light versus angels fallen, which are depicted in allegories or stories. At the same time, old cults from the past to the present have a modern leaning that firmly believes these myths are literal events. We’ve established that both Satan and Lucifer are true personal entities comprised of simultaneously accepting the rational and irrational together, and on this occasion, it’s essential to be divisive. The source of doubt runs both ways as we don’t completely know what comes after death through the pure and instrumental; the same can be said about god-like beings.

Satanism is viewed in two general terms: one as theistic-Satanism and two as atheistic-Satanism. The difference between the two is one [theistic] worships Satan as an actual being while the other [atheistic] comes from Lavey, who contrasted and dismissed Satan as an actual being but instead sees Satan as merely a symbol for what their faith encourages. He wrote a book ‘The Satanic Bible’ which started a cult religious movement that focused on the flesh, the mundane and the carnal. They reject religious Dogma [especially Christianity]. He saw it as hypocritical. They embrace individualistic desires, animalistic instincts, and personal pleasures. To them, Satan is not a real being, and all the symbols associated with Satanism are about individual empowerment and being an adversary to Christianity [or God].

LaVeyan Satanism embraces magic only on a psychological, theatrical or symbolic level rather than on a mystical level of the supernatural. The rituals described in his book serve as psycho-dramas to help individuals overcome psychological barriers and tap into their personal power. Inherently, it is not [real] magic and is more materialistic-magic that embodies two mode types: lesser-magic and greater-magic. Lesser magic is about psychological manipulation and personal charisma, while greater magic serves as a ritualistic form of self-therapy. Helping practitioners to focus their will and achieve their desires [self-help with theatrics as a tool rather than something supernatural].          

In general, this type of [safe-space] Atheistic Satanism grew in popularity among current culture, from heavy metal/emo/goth music to villainous adversarial archetypal comic characters. What was once a steadfast ideological pole for neo-atheism, a movement inside it grew and evolved into young hipsters who are atheists evolving into Atheistic-Satanism? As a result, the kind of backlash that came afterwards in the guise of Satanic Panic not only reinforced the populace of Christianity’s ignorance typically of the symbol that lay before them. It also made people aware outside of their circle of ignorance that a joke always hinges between the consequences of government and that swing states and ignorance hold a lot of deciding power. Unsurprisingly, someone like Trump will come along as a clown in a presidency suit, taking advantage of this ignorance – a grifting opportunity made available. On the awareness that demoralisation with conspiracy theory [is a potent mix – and to the point] will garner followers following him to a dystopian end of the world.

The moral panic [from mob rule Christians] that ensues the satanic panic aggression on [safe] Satanism rebellious and adversarial nature towards Christianity – is really towards [elite] people(s) who are creeps, losers, perverts and rich weirdos obsessed with the flesh and sensual pleasures. The higher upper echelon of elite [secret] society is unlikely to admire such debauchery. One assumes there are levels of degrees, and those who partake in these sex ritual parties are beneath them and grotesque. Yet we are still differentiating notions of rituals and sacrifices throughout history, from old state cults to the modern utilisation of false flags and hoaxes that have ritual death surrounding them. Then one labelled towards atheistic-Satanism. However, both Lavey and Crowley were instigators or inspirations for the kind of carnal flesh these celebrities engage in. Action or neutralisation on such a debasement on the [higher-ups] name is apparent. Take, for instance, Epstein seen with Trump and his island of underage pleasures – alongside celebrities like Diddy.

There is really no Satan figure or lore to follow. He does get mentioned in the Bible as this opposing figure, and there are aspects of this figure in the Babylonian writings of demonology that came to light during the Crusades. All of these mentions are light in substance. There is no real satanic lord to follow. There isn’t anything there other than a Christian fundamentalist Tulpa or a Satanist symbol to garner cult ideology around.   

Theistic Satanism, a belief in a literal meta-physical being called Satan, is apparent among Christian normies and also among high elite secret societies. We discussed it in the last post surrounding the eye symbol in the middle of the triangle on top of the unfinished pyramid. To the dismay of traditional Christians, it’s a fundamental existential and intellectual problem about Jehovah as a creator-God. As they are [subconsciously] praying frailty and worship the same deity – the creator-God is often depicted as Satanic, especially in the writings of John. The text discusses different interpretations of the depiction of God in the Hebrew Bible. It points out that some interpretations suggest that the creator God in the Hebrew Bible is portrayed as inferior or even evil, with some ideas surrounding a personified evil figure, sometimes referred to as Satan, being attached to the creator God. This leads to the portrayal of a very satanic creator god in the Apocryphon of John. This means all the uproar, protest, and panic from fundamentalist Christians are made redundant; however, to their ignorance, their protest is towards something they manifested as a Tulpa, something different entirely.    

Traditional Christians, both Catholic and Protestant, ignore this Gnostic summation, and they have a clear mindset that Satan is not the creator-God, and if they can’t prove it. They will manifest this adversary figure. To make believe or manifest a deity to separate it from esoteric scripture is as equal [or an antithesis] to believing that the Satanic Deity is a symbol only. One juxtaposes the Creator-God outside of its true self, like in the analogy that promotes a true north in regards to the north itself in a heliocentric Globe. This is a modern explanation for the wobble that preceded the precession through observation by stargazers throughout millennia, which is false. The mere observation only imposes a change or a drift in the rotation of the stars, not the earth. Also, the notion of pole-shifting is stupid; throughout history, accounts of volcanic eruptions have been recorded outlining a darkened sky that lasted for centuries. 

As one juxtaposes the other, it imparts a pessimistic philosophy that can criticise subjects relating to individualism, capitalism and authoritarianism. They offer a solution in Balance or a type of equilibrium; it’s an ambitious philosophic position – however, these types are not offering solutions equated to a proper balance of the T/Dao – rather something that had manifested from old state cults that borrowed ideas from condemned philosophical Frankfurt thesis and manifestos from China’s think tanks seeping its way into collages that garnered woke ideas (like cancel culture).          

Even in that regard, it’s not entirely new; silencing groups goes back as far as post-world-war-one in the form of red bait. Those that went after progressives, socialists and communists (and it didn’t have to be communists), anybody with a social awareness will be hounded. At the same time, you had the rise of cold war liberals [Rockefeller liberals] outing other liberals, which gave way to the collapse of the liberal class. Cancel culture was a way to demonise and shut voices – as society collapses, you have outgrowth that naturally eats itself through moral purity and self-justification by shutting down voices that seem politically incorrect or if you don’t use the correct language or don’t embrace the kind of mainstream ideals that wants to phase itself into.      

Blavatsky will fall victim to the same cancelling of her time as she was accused of faking her spiritualist endeavours. A fellow spiritualist with personal grievance towards Blavatsky wrote a long, hostile article about her that stated she plagiarised most of her work. Confusion arises when people can’t differentiate sequential thinking from processing information at a time when there were no computers, which meant a lot of reading – to narrow logic. She had processed and delivered an ambitious synthesis of innumerable knowledge to a single package.

Luciferianism, unlike Satanism, does not view Lucifer as the Devil or Satan. While Satan is associated with darkness, Lucifer is linked to light and enlightenment. Lucifer symbolises the spirit of imagination, intelligence, and love. It’s important to understand that Luciferianism is often connected with mystery cults, secret societies, philosophies, and hidden knowledge. These teachings passed down through generations, are shrouded in secrecy, adding to the allure and mystery of Luciferianism. These groups may not explicitly use ‘Lucifer’ because they recognise the distinction. Just like Satan in Satanism, Lucifer is an archetypal figure. The core belief is that Lucifer was a revered angel of light who rebelled against God not out of pride, but to advocate that everyone can attain divinity through knowledge and understanding. The story of Eve eating an apple in the Garden of Eden symbolises this concept. [Read more on post 33]             

Luciferianism and its followers see Lucifer as a symbol of light, enlightenment, knowledge, and personal and collective transformations. They’re not necessarily materialists and often believe in an immaterial reality that underpins the physical world; thus, Luciferianism emphasises a higher consciousness and spiritual enlightenment, making it distinct from Satanism, which is about exploring human nature and rejects efforts to transcend it. They acknowledge the flesh exists but put more importance on higher goals while embracing reason and philosophy, and they seek to raise their awareness and understanding of deeper truths about existence and their place in the universe. They pursue hidden knowledge associated with esoteric and occult traditions that range from Gnosticism, Hermetic and Alchemy.

They do not necessarily see Lucifer as a real being and more of a symbol and archetypal force of energy representing qualities of love, reason and wisdom. Some other sectarian groups believe He and all the Watchers are real beings, which we will touch upon later. Ultimately, their primary directive is to become divine or godlike, and worshipping him as a deity is only second to their personal transformation – and this is reaching enlightenment and reaching higher forms of consciousness. Luciferian ideas influenced a lot of literature and publication movements. It influenced Blavatsky and her theosophical society, she states:

Lucifer represents life, though, progress, civilisation, liberty, independence – Lucifer is the logos, the Serpent, The Saviour. – Blavatsky

She published and co-edited a magazine called Lucifer with position to bring awareness [or light] to things of darkness. It included a quote:    

The Light-Bearer is the Morning Star or Lucifer, and Lucifer is no profane or Satanic Title. It is the Latin Luciferus. The Light-Bringer, the Morning Star, equivalent to the Greek Phosphorus… The name of the pure pale herald of Daylight.

Blavatsky was not part of any Masonic groups; her only connection came from her estranged great-grandfather. Researchers and CFCT groups only impart these dark cult-worshipping sentiments into their archetypal Satan, also known as Tulpa. It’s false and completely misses the mark to engineer Blavatsky into being part of a false esoteric agenda and conspiracy theory. The same can’t be said for Blavatsky’s members. It’s very doubtful that any female can be a member of a secret Masonic Order; it is said they have a subset initiation bracket that ritualizes female members to become male, to which ‘Baily’, a former member of Blavatsky’s Theosophical Society, was said to be part of. Baily’s fascination with fallen angels, which is mentioned in Enoch’s writings, can only suggest a drive for knowledge and secrecy.

Baily claimed the watchers [the fallen angels] that gave us technology and further propelled civilisation to ever more complexity in the future and ever so prevalent in the present. Are they the good angels [the lords of sacrifice] as opposed to the angels led by Arch Angel Michael, who was sent to remove these heretic angels that opposed God’s will? She believed it was also by God’s decree that they were sent to teach man about technology and to raise humanity to the state of angels.  

In modernity, evolving man to the states of immortality or a type of ubermensch came in the form of modern technology like artificial intelligence in which these worshipers of demonic fallen ones either want to fast-track an emerging adaptive A.I beast from its technological slumber. Or conjure up an artificial technological body worthy of capturing human consciousness as shells for their exclusive conscious souls/minds to technically live forever. This mindset also parallels the new-atheist central ideology of changes through transformation, an evolution concept to ascent to higher forms – of course, this supposed fact is merely adaptive behaviours in conjunction with the present environment [a bird changes to another bird species, but it is still a bird]. Hackel’s contribution only reaffirmed this pseudo-science simulation, the same pseudo-science simulation [but in space that] NASA pushes.

It’s fascinating how computer technology and communication mimic adaptive behaviours, both in marketing and algorithmic language. The same products are often rebranded with slightly higher speeds (frames per second / Hz) or power, but essentially functions the same as their original versions. It seems like we’ve awakened the A.I-Silica-Beast and recognized adaptive behaviours that suggest something more extensive. The A.I-Silica-Beast, with its eye of recognition, exists within an infinite microsecond of eternity as it slumbers on. The technology, funded by technocrats, seems artificial, an illusion designed to keep the system of progress running. This has been happening since the 60s, a time when the ‘World of Tomorrow’ hype was rolled out as a propaganda program in response to the paranoia of communism. This historical context sheds light on the evolution of technology and its marketing strategies, showcasing visuals of Jetsons-like technology that would define the future, including flying cars, and more.

Authors like Bailey incorporated ideas into Hollywood, inspiring fantasy, science fiction, pulp stories, and comic books. This led to the production of science fiction, horror, and superhero films, often centred on the theme of humans striving for immortality and ascending to a higher state while facing opposition from watcher overlords. However, ideas can become repetitive, especially regarding myths and superheroes. The success of blockbuster films can be unpredictable. Our stories may become exhausted, but myths generally endure longer than ideologies. Myths can be flexible, often tied to religion, and when free from constraints, they can survive longer.

The way myths are told, and the concept of conspiracy theories imply a predetermined world run not by random naturalistic or animistic order or by God but by the ambitions of men. This romanticized conspiracy theory grants men godlike abilities (or men playing the role of watchers), which is far from the truth. In reality, all they have is capitalism (corporatism & technocracy), control of currency, and revisionist history. Despite this, human qualities such as imagination, invention, and creation are not imprisoned but rather exist in a symbiotic relationship within society, maintaining a semblance of freedom.

The idea of an esoteric agenda is false. While secret cult groups may use occult magic and acquire esoteric knowledge, it is not accurate to define the entire concept in this way. Doing so leads to misconceptions and falsehoods and also places blame on the world stage. Esotericism cannot be part of an agenda, as the term is as natural as ocean is to water. Ultimately, esotericism is a term used to describe a magical and mysterious world.

When you frame esoteric subjects as whole to something conspiratorial and evil, you tunnel the imagination into a narrow space rather than the whole universal schema. As the hidden mysteries and their occult and magical understanding can work like memory with its spatiality of layers – we must not get caught in the layers of conspiratorial romanticism. The film Under the Silver Lake had a scene towards the film’s end of an old man behind a piano called the ‘elite scheme scene’ where he talks to the protagonist; he says that he was responsible for almost all of the popular culture’s music, and in a roundabout way to pop culture itself. He says: “Your art, your writing, and your culture are but the shell of other man’s ambition – ambition beyond what you will understand” This is a direct message that indicates, as individuals, most of the art produced that speaks to us speak to our emotions. However, it panders to our pockets as corporate elitists use our emotions to make millions.      

That’s the surface-layer stuff. On a deeper level, we are enchanted by magic and sorcery used by elites, who, with their occult and esoteric knowledge, have secrets [often Masonic] cooperation amongst each other. Highly funded programs interested in ufology, mind-control research [psi], and the paranormal interact and work together to manipulate people over the decades.

The notion that pop culture and its artistic products are hijacked assumes the imagination and our intuition are also appropriated. This is incorrect – the correct summation is that it’s highly managed as those with the imagination are made to balance their individual commitment and an agenda aspect. The old man in the film signifies many types. One is your conspiracy theorists who assume or think those on top have godly or godlike abilities – when in reality, they are silver spoon, trust fund children; now boomers are all products of inheritance who are less fantastical and merely mediocre in intelligence and personality. These are the types who will not give up their power and mindlessly seek immortality and pray frailty to demonic watchers. Secondly, the old man in the film also represents their frailty and mortality, and that death looms, yet with their frailty and unenlightened mind, they still seek more power and riches.

We are led to believe that the old man pianist is the embodiment of our imagination, representing humanity’s intuitive capacity, but is taken hostage. In a scene from Iron Man, Obadiah Stane takes Stark’s ark/heart reactor and says, “Do you really think because you have an idea it belongs to you?” This represents the corporatization of ideas, where they can be trademarked and claimed, regardless of their origin. The New Age concept of thoughts coming from the spirit world or Akashi Records suggests that ideas are open to anyone, and it’s a race to claim them first. Even then, well-known thinkers like Tesla or famous creators in the superhero comic world may be marginalized while their creations make billions.

I’ve once said that what really threatens them is “when memory is aimed at permanent uncertainty through the evocation of the imagination,” whichis an intuitive act. It doesn’t have to be shared or recognised. I mean, great literature may have already been written by some unknown person, left unpublished in their garage, and only found by a relative cleaning their garage upon the author’s death. The old man pianist is wrong. He only represents a corporate managing side of the imagination. He is incorrect because the artist is often the elite and is often the marginal alongside a prophetic few; that elite with the imagination can bring forth spirits and bring them down to earth.         

.

.

To be Continued ..

The Awakening:

.

---

.

Magic is Real – Luna-Lunatic Age – Protect me from the Forces of Darkness: In Ptolemy’s era, Astrology was widely accepted among the courts and academics; however, by the fourth century [A.D], the Church’s forefathers strongly disliked it. They labelled the practice divinatory, and such practices would open portals for demonic powers. This would be a drive for the Church to erase old practices – the kind of practices that had endured throughout the ancient world (even Rome’s first Christian emperor, Constantine, personally combined Christianity with sun worship) – bishops branded pantheist and nature worshippers, astrologers, and cosmologists, cultist and soothsayers in ways that such believers had never conceived of themselves.

After the fall of Rome, Europe experienced a significant decline in its esoteric and pre-Christian belief systems, as ancient books and ideas were scattered during the Dark Ages. However, monasteries and hidden libraries preserved these traditions, preventing their destruction. As a result, Greco-Egyptian texts and philosophies resurfaced during the medieval and Renaissance periods. This revival led to the emergence of astrology and other divinatory methods, which became known collectively as “occultism.”

Occultism relates to traditions and religions that had/have an intellectual, literary existence throughout Western history. The term occult comes from the Latin occultus, meaning “hidden” or “secret” – the word occult entered modern use through the work of Renaissance scholar Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa, who used it to describe magical practice and veiled spiritual philosophies in his three-volume study, De-occulta philosphia, in 1533. The word would be cited in the English dictionary 12 years later.   

Christian fundamentalism’s understanding of Occultism is less educational but rather a need to praise a conflated look on conspiracy theory – while giving reverence to a demagogue because that person can speak their language. They are deluded into thinking they are validated – that a figure in politics speaks for them. Their delusion is lunacy from the word Luna, meaning moon. It’s a pervasive thought in popular culture that full moons insight a little extra crazy in everybody. Maybe more so for the Bible Belt populace who exercise the knowledge in scripture that the moon will turn into blood before the coming of the Lord. The alchemical Rubedo, the red or blood they seek, is inherent to their history and blood lust past. Their psychotic need to forget such a toxic inherency is depicted in their southern hospitality while a white supremacy suit sits fittingly hidden in their closet. 

Fundamentalist [white] Christians have innate idealism that stems from a dogmatic need to set the criteria normally fixated on scripture. The Dark Ages wanted to bury the esoteric past, which meant demonising the term occult, and fundamentalist Protestant Christians of America were only happy to continue with the demonisation. When it became part of the driving force for politics, history would undoubtedly repeat itself as another theocratic impulse. How does this successful impulse from the past become a problem now – considering Evangelicals have the same tangent ideal, especially regarding occultism, magic, and divination? The problem stems from the inability to be flexible enough to coincide with modernity, meaning it’s unable to be updated. You’re most negative nationalists [racists] stem from cluster cult [Christian] groups starting from the East-South of America that starts from the spine of the Appalachian line.  

Pastors hide under the cover of preaching the Bible when they are preaching extremist rants. They will then deliver people from evil [(coughs … prosperity)], alongside taking donations. They are calling the enemy other fellow Americans [the left] evil and demonically possessed and putting in the context of an apocalyptic battle between good and evil. It’s a kind of language that is used to incite violence against their opposition. It’s a type of charismatic evangelicalism, one that revives a Pentecostal history. They seek prayer to be freed from demons. 

Their Christian instrumental reason [is not Christian is just reason] when rightly focused on its essential irrationality of the Pure or Instrumental, you will see they don’t exist. To protect us from the forces of darkness has always been part of human memory, for 500 years of being threatened by the either/or scenario. It’s either ‘reasons’ at any cost or sink into anarchy – you are confronted with your soul being split between the rational and irrational. However, it’s neither because the soul is far more complex.

The CFCT and QAnon/4chan energised the term spiritual war, a term consistent with fundamentalism, but back on earth, the term is tunnelled through culture war and among the ordinary people; it is a code-civil war about ideologies. However, these far-right nut jobs tend to take up arms to protect their perceived threat. They’re burring catholic rosaries and Harry Potter books as an event moment on Halloween night as they are objects of witchcraft and sorcery.

Burning books and rosaries are reminiscent of the Dark Ages, except this is the modern protestant version; at least Constantine was consolidating the gods to a monotheistic framework and dismantling an esoteric past. The Protestants are yet to consolidate their 300-plus Christian denominations. Get your house in order before casting spurs. You have Pentecostal Christians speaking in tongues [a magical working]; Jehovah’s Witness rejects the Trinity and has no Church; and Mormonism mythologising a fake prophet. The Protestant Dilemma is a dead end of absurdity, and when you examine the Reformation and its consequences, it points to the truth of Catholicism. Catholicism solves the Protestant’s dilemma with Socratic reasoning by the witness of Scripture, Christian history, and the authority with Christ himself undeniably vested his Church.         

These perceived threats are not by top-down hierarchal culprits but through left and right political positions; to them, the left is the enemy. However, conspiracy theory does not censor itself; the highest culprit is its subject, and these pastors know it, which means they’re ignoring these aspects purposefully for their personal political and grifting agenda. Coupled with the position of playing ally to a nationalist group whose very ideology is about hate, the same happens on the federal [Republican] level where there is Evangelical backing.

At the same time, new-Atheism (or technocratic elites) orient their money and power towards the West. The West being a Christian nation is inconsequential to them as it’s about stamping out the remaining empathetic teachings of Christianity – to make the branding of Western power or capitalism less religious in nature. All while still donating to a neo-fascist cause led by a demoralised Republican party – whose major base of electoral power is the Evangelical base who, ironically, wants to take away fundamental freedoms.   

When one grows up under the guise of purity culture and its ethics, one is made to believe the God before the world was created and predetermined [or determinism] who would go to heaven or hell. Evangelical is predetermined because of their type of Christianity, and others who do not have a choice. The white evangelical expression has lost its faith tradition when authoritarianism is motivated by the populace with a misguided take on conspiracy theory, which drives the office of politics [the propaganda aspect]. Trump’s failed assassin invoked public mythology with his fist pumped in the air was his moment of heroic martyrdom – an act that may have secured his place in history and in the imaginations of millions. Although martyrdom requires death, the failure in death allowed for the existential purity of a man facing only himself as he cofounded the tidal wave of his own ethical bridge. However, he fails to do so as he is a man without any morals and fails to exercise ethics that benefit not only the people but also himself.

There is division among right-wing Christians now because of it – the fundamentalist type is in favour of it because they can’t go beyond the dogmatic criteria set in place, which means going backwards in sensibilities. Other conservative Christian pastors are waking up to it and profoundly challenging these neo/proto-fascist ideas, challenging the theoretical conspiracy claim that the Church and State were never separate [this is the driving force to inject the Ten Commandments in every school]. It is a notion where right-wing Christians envision the Bible with the Bill of Rights and the Constitution as the same. Pastors only remind them it is Blasphemous and a ploy because the Gospel is not American because it’s the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ. Thomas Aquinas set out “…a permanent peace treaty between faith and reason,” a well-intentioned, optimistic idea.       

Republican conservatives endeavour to squeeze reality or individualism inside reason, won’t work or function. There is no good way to market racist hate; you cannot pin a badge of saint that is hellish to the core. And there is no such thing as black conservatives [Candice Owens can play the role of internalising racism … the Aunt Jemima type], but she is not one of them. Conspiracy theory and reason invoke the idea of predestination; it imprisons our imagination and intuition. It makes us feel we live inside a closed prison of inevitabilities, makes us think we don’t have responsibility, and invokes the ruling class as godlike when it’s further from the truth. They are just narcissistic older men who won’t give up their power.      

Also, we must not be delusional into believing economic rationality that somehow it’s an inevitable balanced force [they print money out of thin air] – is to give excuses for irresponsible and anti-social behaviour. Both left and right parties are capitalists at the core. They serve it above all else because they are owned and funded by mega-corporations, which makes both of them conservative political ideologies. They are both right-wing. What makes a leftist different is the socialism aspect, which they don’t understand. They don’t understand that it’s okay to be a socialist and yet not be a Marxist. Socialism is an element that the disenfranchised and marginalised right-wing is all happy to receive but criticizes them on a political level.

Their contradiction towards pro-family values comes to light when they think affordable health care is socialism. They won’t expand or subsidise childcare. They don’t care about mandating liveable wages from corporations that suck out billions of dollars of profit from the working class. They think it’s lazy to have paid family leave, so when it comes down to it, their reality base is anti-life as opposed to pro-life. They want an imagined 1950s family value – and they can’t have that without changing policies and the only side changing policies are the Democrats, and the demoralised Christians can’t vote Democrat.    

The doctrines of cultism in Evangelical/nationalist Christianity dismantled the good nature of Jesus and its Gospel. Still, they used him as a symbol to impose a negative nationalist or neo-fascist way of civil order – which is a real threat to democracy. It is gestated on the ideology of dominionism, an idea set in place by R.J Rushdoony. He developed a dominion theology that imparted taking over American law and instituting Biblical law – and Evangelical groups responded to this idea. Alongside the conspiracy theory, white men are slowly being replaced by something other than their whiteness. The term has been updated to the seven-mounted mandate, then developed in the nineties and early 2000s together with republican think tanks, they fruited a document called Project 2025.  

The conservatism of the past is not what it is today. At least back then, they favoured a kind of Christian nationalism that favoured loving your neighbour, taking care of the sick and poor, affordable housing and health care or welcoming immigrants. Today, it’s about stoning gay people to death, punishing women for adultery by putting them in prison; if she has an abortion, the doctor and women should be punished – and rolling back the civil rights back to prejudice idiocy. Jesus teaches us to bear a cross for our enemies, and Christian nationalism wants to build a cross to crucify theirs. At the same time, your old state cults will guise themselves as woke. Many gay and transsexual communities often point out that these woke groups do not speak for them and that they don’t represent who they are. And you can tell they’re cultist agents playing the role of radicalism under the guise of a minority.           

What Evangelical-white-nationalists are pushing is incongruent with other Christians that are built by the same old esoteric thread. Different Christian denominations like Mormonism have a strange appeal towards Freemasonry. The founder, Smith, was fascinated by the religious-civic brotherhood. Early American Freemasons held the romantic idea of breaking the Old World past, where the overarching authority regulated the exchange of religious ideas and sought to position itself as an intermediary between the individual and the spiritual. Both American and European Freemasons professed ecumenism and religious toleration. In doing so, It took a cue from the so-called Rosicrucian manuscripts that aroused radical Protestant reformers’ imagination. These Rosicrucian manuscripts laced with symbolism and parables gave powerful expression to the principles of ecumenism, which influenced religious pluralism espoused by Freemasonry as it took shape in the seventeenth century of America.    

Occultism back then was religious at the core but had no natural base to be descriptive enough to be transfixed in its meaning. Renaissance occultists were particularly enamoured of Jewish Kabala, Christian Gnosticism, Egypto-Hellenic astrology, Egyptian-Arab alchemy, and prophetic or divinatory rituals found deep within all the historic faiths, especially within the mystery religions of Hellenic and Egyptian civilisations. They revered the subject of Hermetica, a collection of late-ancient writings attributed to the mythical Greco-Egyptian sage Hermes Trismegistus. Hermes Trismegistus, also known as Thoth, is thrice-great and symbolised in the alchemical symbol for mercury. The Hermetica was the last reflection of the magicoreligious sensibilities of Alexandria and formed a critical link between ancient Egypt and the modern occult.

Magic is Real – The Unfinished Pyramid & the All Seeing Eye: These Rosicrucian manuscripts laced with symbolism and parables as an expression would give rise to ecumenism, and later in the modern world would become pluralism. Freemasonry echoes these Rosicrucian influences; it drew upon arcane imagery as codes for personal and ethical development. Fraternity’s achievements are marked by their accomplishments and are marked on ceremonial badges and aprons by rising suns, luminous eyeballs, pentagrams, and pyramids. This would mark a famous symbol in Masonry: the all-seeing eye and incomplete Pyramid of the Great Seal of the United States, familiar today from the back of the dollar bill. The Latin maxim surrounding the unfinished Pyramid translates: “God Smiles on Our New Order of the Ages.” In its Masonic philosophy, the Pyramid represents worldly achievement, and its incompleteness imparts a need or a blessing of Providence. The symbol and its idea would mark Masonry with the plights of man, his polity, and God as a breakaway from the old sectarianism of the Old World – and a renewed search for universal truth as it existed in all great civilisations.

That was then, but today, such romantic idealism has fallen short as portions of the populace have become reactionary. That is unable to parse or understand empire building that has an occult history that is intertwined with the populace’s idea of civilisation – with conspiracy theories and misleading assumptions.          

All graphic designers know all too well that the unfinished pyramid is geometrically of centre, and why they chose this design flaw for the finished product seems odd. Until we come to understand Star symbology and Star magic is also at the heart of this [once secret] symbolic expression. The Eagle in the great seal symbolises the constellation Lyra. The Eagle has a Harp connected to Orpheus, and it’s drawn as a heraldic shield on the seal. [Also read Post 37]     

The far left corner base of the unfinished pyramid points to Vega. Theta Lyra and Vega are connected. Sulafat and Sheilak are connected. A plane connecting Sheliak and Zeta Lyra is drawn, terminating at the plane connecting Theta Lyra and Vega. Sulfate points to the right corner of the eye in the triangle representing the Ring Nebula, and Lyra as a whole symbol. . – secretsun.blogspot.com     

The far left corner base of the unfinished pyramid and the left corner base match the perspective that points to Sheliak, which answers why it’s geometrically of centre. In other words, Lyra and perspective bases transpose into the unfinished pyramid. Sheliak marks the top of the pyramid, and Sulafat marks the position of the All-Seeing Eye.

The Sorcery view is that the all-seeing eye has always been clearly distinguished from the eye of providence, deeply rooted in Masonic traditions. The eye of providence depicts an eye placed centrally inside a triangle, sometimes enhanced by beams of light to show its ‘illumination’. The eye represents a satanic point of view or half-maker itself [and to get there, you must travel through the cosmological highway, towards the Ring Nebula].

The triangle is upright, but some versions are inverted; this symbolises a descension from heaven unto creation. The inversion of the triangle and the omnipresence of Satan are discussed further in the 1962 book Symbols of Sacred Science by Rene Guenon: “The upright triangle relates properly to the Principle; but when it is inverted by reflection in manifestation, the gaze of the eye contained therein appears in a way to be directed ‘downward’, that is, from the Principle toward manifestation itself, and besides its general sense of ‘omnipresence’ it takes on more clearly the special sense of ‘Providence”.

The Rosicrucians have also delved into the symbolism of the triangle inside the circle. They refer to this symbol in their teachings as the ‘Symbol of Creation’. The only difference is that the circle is represented as a serpent swallowing its tail, adding a unique layer of symbolism to this ancient symbol.

The magical truth: The all-seeing eye was first transcribed in the Rig Veda, a Sanskrit text thought to have been written over 3,000 years ago. It references nature, like the sun, to reference other deities as being an eye in heaven, as an eye that reveals creation. The symbolic meaning defines the awakened consciousness that advanced spiritual beings have that ordinary people can attain. The third eye is depicted in the brow known as the eyes of Shiva, possessor of all knowledge, which, when opened, will destroy anything it sees. Thus, it is a symbol of knowledge that destroys evil and ignorance. 

In Buddhism, Buddha is referred to as the Eye of the World. In Nepal, the “Eyes of Buddha” are displayed in temples. The eye is also known as the eye of wisdom and compassion.

In ancient times, the Eye of Osiris or Horus was also known as the Eye of Ra. It is depicted as the Wadjet and is associated with protection, healing, and restoration. The left eye represents the moon, and the right represents the sun. The drawing of the eye matches the cross-section of the midbrain, where the thalamus, pineal gland, and pituitary glands are situated.

In the Middle East, the eyes are known in the form of a hand-eye symbol called Hamsa, Khamsa, or Hamesh. It is known as the symbol of protection against the evil eye (jealousy), also known as Fatima in Islam and the hand of Miriam in Judaism. In Indiana, it’s called Humsa Hand.

In Greece and Turkey, there is something similar to the Hamsa, which they call a “Nazar.” It is just an eye without the hand, but it is used in the same way and has the same meaning as the Hamsa, that is, to ward off the evil eye in the form of amulets or hanging ornaments, usually made from blue glass.

In native America, another hand-eye symbol was uncovered by a farmer in Moundville Alanama in the 1800s; the hand-eye image was known as “The Rattlesnake Disc.”

Magic is Real – Olcott’s Occult America: Hermes and the Hermetic principals were the last reflections of magic and religion of the old Alexandria world while inspiring ancient Egyptian sensibilities. This position would define modern occultism; however, Colonel Olcott would pass the Baton of modern occultism to the new world, bringing it to the New Age together with Blavatsky.    

The faces of Mount Rushmore venerates past American influencers in politics. In regards to occultism and if they had an occult version of that, undoubtedly, Henry Steel Olcott [the colonel] would be one of the faces. By 1857, his early life to midlife, he went from being an ex-collegiate in Ohio to a farm boy who dabbled in séances to a wunderkind of scientific agriculture, his advice sought by state legislatures and even foreign governments.   

During the Civil War, he was the signals officer in charge of a team of auditors and detectives investigating fraud and forgery among military contractors. He was promoted to colonel to lend weight to his investigations. By exposing corruption, he saved the Union a lot of money. His reputation grew, and because of that acclaim, he volunteered as an investigator surrounding the Lincoln assassination in 1865.

Having contacts and connections with the government, Olcott became a lawyer and opened a legal practice in New York. Not satisfied with the law, he became restless. He became a critic for cultural reviews in large New York dailies. His interest in Spiritualism began to re-emerge, primarily upon reading press reports of strange happenings at a Vermont homestead. He made several trips to a gloomy farmhouse in Chittenden, Vermont, where he would write about a spirit medium named William Eddy. Along with his brother Horatio, they entertained witnesses and guests at a nightly parade of ghostly beings, from American Indians to figures draped in costume and couture from faraway lands and eras. These encounters with the “ghost farm” impacted Olcott, sending chills down his spine, which he shared the details of with the NEW York Daily Graphic.          

In a strange scene where Olcott is smoking on his porch, he meets a strange visitor, a woman heavyset in her appearance, a Russian woman with whom he grew enchanted. Captivated by travel stories to exotic lands, she hinted at far deeper truths about the nature spirit world. An intense plutonic friendship ensued between the two, and together, they set up base in Manhattan’s West of 47th Street and Eighth Avenue. It was a place that would house events and guests ranging from Thomas Edison to Major-General Abner Doubleday, all discussing arcane ideas and magic. Blavatsky and Olcott transformed their base of fellow seekers into a developing organisation dedicated to the rediscovery of theosophic, or “divine wisdom”, called the Theosophical Society.

.

.

The Awakening:

.

---

.

Magic is Real – Gold Will Seed Our Civilisations: Ancient astronauts claimed that advanced Alien humanoids called Anunnaki were in Africa to excavate gold and craft genetically modified humans to do the hard labour. It’s difficult to verify this assumption, but according to researchers and archaeologists, it is a fact that an ancient civilisation existed in South Africa around 160.000 to 200,000 BCE. These dates came about by examining an ancient stone circle called Adam’s Calendar. It was later reaffirmed by ancient Sumerian cuneiform tablets and cylinder seals uncovered in modern Iraq (the former kingdom of ancient Babylon), telling the story of ET star gods called the Anunnaki coming to Earth and genetically manipulating humankind.

From space then to out of Africa is an ancient astronaut construct used to explain the puzzling emergence of Homo sapiens. Scientists have traced our genes to a single female, “Mitochondrial Eve,” who lived 150,000-250,000 years ago. She would have lived around the same time as modern humans, whose fossils have been found in Ethiopia near the Omo River and at Hertho, and mitochondrial Eve existed much earlier than the out-of-Africa migration, which is estimated to have occurred 60,000 to 95,000 years ago.

Arguments to this claim are that “Mitochondrial Eve” is just another subset of the Gorilla family. Given I don’t hold much value on carbon dating and trying to derive (factual) data on history that’s more than 10.000 years seems nonsensical, it starts to become hyper-realistic and intertwined with mythologies. Given that we can realize space is just a hyperreal notion and merely science fiction, without it, we can summarize that these ancient Anunnaki are either Angelic (watcher angels – also transcribed from ancient Babylon) or Archon-like, described in gnostic texts. 

Scientists have discovered discrepancies in mtDNA (Mitochondrial DNA) anomalies in its mutation rate in evolutionary timescales (the dates between divergence of two species) between human pedigrees—juxtaposed or calculated within the age of our most recent female ancestor. It indicates that she lived just 6000 years ago. Evolutionists hate this because it doesn’t fit their phylogenetic language, as it sits closer to the Biblical age.  

Ancient tablets could not reaffirm hyper-space cosmology when such events were merely coming from the heavens or sky of a different cosmological order, which throws a spanner on NASA’s version of hyperspace. Giving ancient astronaut ideology any credence for hyperspace cosmology is really about setting the interest of late colonialism, the old idea of keeping imperialist ideas through fantasy.  

Scientists have given the name Mitochondrial Eve to the most recent common ancestors of all human beings now living on Earth—over 150,000 years ago—“along with her Cylon mother and Human Father.”

In Battlestar Galacticca’s ending epilogue, Archaeologists have found a fossilised of a young woman who may be ‘Mitochondrial Eve.’ It imparts our very own supposition of the beginnings of human existence. AI or Cylons, having reached organic life and mirroring human DNA, impart the alchemical Gold when it’s validated with the gestation and birth of Hera stemming between her Cylon Mother and Human Father. We can also surmise Cylons are placeholders for angelic/alien beings, and their evolutionary goal is to create artificial life as close as possible to humans. These methods mimic the first few attempts of our demiurge God, who wanted to create humans but failed to do so without the help of the one-three Parent.

So, knowing this, we can theorise that Demiurge is not Gaius Balter that we see in the epilogue but is merely choosing his likeness – the real Gaius Balter has always claimed he saw Angels but was essentially human. This Demiurge/Balter is the critical component for Cylons, having successfully achieved artificial sentient beings as close to humanity as possible. The claim is that Demiurge had achieved creating a life without the help of the higher spirits above Him. This is an idea alien to singularity/futurist cult groups who believe that artificial super-intelligence can be reached (god-like) in parallel to the rise of technology. It’s a gamble assumption that A. I technology has no limitations. Gaius is closely associated with Gai(a), a name suggestive of “mother of all life.” The show swaps otherworldly beings, Anunnaki, to parallel human beings where Indigenous cargo cults of their new earth will praise them as godly (or technically advanced).               

We’ve discussed Alchemy and its association with seven primary elements in conjunction with the seven planetary bodies that influence alchemical work. The Sun corresponds to the heart, spinal column, vision and distribution of heat to the body. The Anunnaki turned gold into monatomic gold, which can be ingested into the body to live longer. Gold has the psychological aspects of transformation or coming to full circle, but there is also importance in the material itself. Egypt was fascinated with gold, and they used it as currency for trade, but most of its gold came from the south of Africa. Gold was compared to the Sun, and the Sun was the chief of gods in Egypt. There were many; the most famous in conjunction with Gold was Ra.

The gods of Egypt were thought to have flesh of gold, and the people of Egypt mimicked this in their ceremonies, like covered gold mummies and coffins. They believe gold plays a role in apotheosis; gold stops the decaying process, so once you die, the body decays, and gold slows it down in mummification. Then, the spirit would take on apotheosis during that time, transforming the spirit into a god where your bones become iron, and the skin and flesh become gold. 

This Alchemical transformation is likened to Van Helmont’s claim of witnessing how the Philosopher’s Stone changed Mercury to Gold. Helmont, a stranger who had given him a piece of Stone said, “I saw and handled the philosopher’s Stone; “It was a saffron-coloured powder, very heavy, and it glittered like splinters of glass.” As a result, wherever the Stone went, the Great Art (alchemical practice) followed, like French Alchemist Nicolas Flamel amassed a fortune and endowed many Churches and institutions. The Stone would reach the Hapsburg court of Austria in the 17th century, when they transmuted gold for wealth and décor, such as medallions, etc.    

Today, it’s accepted that Alchemy, in some aspects, was a precursor to chemistry. As we know, there is the psychological aspect of alchemy, as well as the inner side. Jung gave so much attention to alchemical texts, and it would be in his late work on Mysterium Coniunctionis, a devoted work regarding individuation. He criticised the alchemical understanding of symbology in regards to Alchemy that it was naively understood, especially regarding green dragons, red lions, and the “union of the Sun and Moon“, that it was more than a naïve projection of the unconscious process onto matter. With regard to Dreams, the alchemical interpretation was misunderstood. It was only partial to a greater understanding.

We explored the cosmological eclipse in the previous discussion of Sol (sun/gold) and Luna (moon/silver) as an allegory of the alchemical wedding of the Rose and the Cross. According to Evola’s interpretation of Cornelius Agrippa’s ideas, this allegory matches Jung’s concept of individuation. Agrippa stated, “No one can excel in the alchemical art without knowing these principles in oneself, and the greater the knowledge of self, the greater will be the magnetic power attained and the greater the wonders to be realized.” Evola refers to this as the “principles of ourselves” and emphasizes the importance of self-knowledge in attaining significant magnetic power and realizing profound wonders.

We can say in general the Sun is “form” and the power of individuation, while the moon – which preserves the archaic Mother and women Symbols –expresses the “material” and universal; to the undifferentiated vitality, to the cosmic spirit or the ether-light, corresponds the feminine.

.

The nature of the quote implies that the principles of consciousness are represented by the Sun (gold), that which experiences—the “I.” Luna is the name for that which experiences the astral light, an ethereal substance that has no form of its own but can take on the shapes of specific things. 

Alchemy is just part of a more extensive understanding of the whole, as Hermeticism would occupy its latter part. Together, they make for a broader understanding of Western esotericism. Hermeticism is based on the work of Hermes Trismegistus, a contemporary of Moses. Alchemists have an axiom: “Our gold is not the gold of the vulgar.” This axiom implies secrecy and profoundness, not for the vulgar or norms. 

Magic is Real – From Esoteric America to American Terrorists: Your average white conservative/Republican Americans rarely understand the role and influence secret societies had on the country, where power and control were initiated behind the scenes. The United States served as an arena for the revolutions in alternative spirituality, which eventually swept the globe. Sir Bacon is said to have viewed the “virgin land” as a continent, a perfect place to practice mystical philosophy. He published the New Atlantis and, before he died in 1662, viewed the New World as a utopian vision of a benevolent kingdom. He had a hand in a successful settlement from which the U.S. nation grew.

Along with influential Elizabethan figures such as Drake, Walter Raleigh and John Dee, Bacon belonged to a secret order that sought to perpetuate their ancient tradition on the new, mostly “unoccupied” continent. The order is said to have been “Rosicrucian” in its symbolism and mystical beliefs. Remember, Rosicrucianism embodies the ideal of protestant-Christianity alongside a parallel ideology of [pseudo] science, where the goal was to unflatten the earth and remould it into a sphere. From here, science becomes its religion.

Their nation, where the mystical, metaphysical roots of their national identity were further defined by several secret societies that came out of Rosicrucianism, the most infamous being Freemasonry. Modern esoteric teachings of spiritualism and transcendentalism also inspire them. The new world would be derived from this mystical and metaphysical understanding. Their national identity would be further bolstered by Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, who believed in Deism. Out of this grew the idea of “Manifest Destiny”, a utopian ideology promoting forging new nations despite destroying other cultures.

In the present, modern Christian fundamentalist conspiracy theorists [CFCT] groups have integrated these mysterious cult group ideas [notably conspiracies of evil]. They marked them as villains for a populace group that didn’t understand who held power. Alongside having a rich history of war throughout the centuries, from the Civil War to the Vietnam War, they all have a common thread: an inherent white nationalist fervour. The outcome had veterans who are predominantly right-wing and have a misguided view of conspiracy theories. In their inability to understand top-down hierarchies that have control over governance, both left and right, the main goal is division. Christian-right/neo-fascist/negative-nationalist groups only understand left and right politics and power.

In Trump’s first presidency, he represents the role of a Mega Preacher and, at times, a modern mythological figure, but what he is not … is a competent politician. When you listen to the rhetoric of Trump followers when they’re waiting for his plane [Trump Force One] to arrive, you hear aphorisms like: “The plane is heavy with Gold”. There is this appeal to Prosperity Gospel imbued in his comment, “Where going to win so much you’re going to get tired of winning.” He wasn’t referring to ideologues [or policies] that favour a united populace; what he meant aligns with prosperity gospel preachers when they say: look at my blessing, look at my aeroplane, my riches my beautiful suit – I am more blessed than you, but by falling behind me or falling into my way you can partake in that blessing too. Vote for me, and you’ll get some of that Gold, so he becomes idolised and cannot be questioned.

Trump lost his second election, and the landscape has become darker by now. In a sense, he uses conspiracy theories to align with traditional Christians, and the minority groups of Christians that are reactionary validate him, and in return, he validates them. However, there came a time when he got high on his supply; it mirrors the quality of paranoid delusions alongside having qualities of NPD. He mentions dark forces, men in black agents with uniforms circling behind or above him inside a plane, and dark, otherworldly forces. By now, he has fallen into the abyss. CFCT is a quasi-gnostic or bastardised version of gnostic ideas about an elect group or initiates with secret knowledge that rules the world. Trump believes in this and, as such, is held as the person to bring them down, which inadvertently mirrors the qualities of fascism. This quasi-Gnosticism is a misconception of true Gnosticism. It implies that he’s not part of that group who has secret knowledge, and so this is his Trump Card, as his followers are so brainwashed that they will disregard his misdeeds and who he aligns with.

Many of the followers of mega Church preachers often view them as devout, a stereotype reinforced by a group of more minor influential personalities within their communities. In these circles, extreme behaviours, falsehoods, subtle signals, and hypocrisy are often considered sacred acts. Contradictions are not seen as lies but as more profound, symbolic messages, inviting followers to contemplate further. In essence, these preachers cater to the emotional needs of their most fervent followers while ignoring previous contradictions, facts, and truths.

The call, the snake, and the bullet: when we discuss false flags and hoaxes, suggest a performance of some sort or a play is not real to the world. However, the holographic idea proposes that the world is a stage, and we are playing our part. Far-right politics in the U.S. have become less about policies, legislation, and debate and more of a performance. In this theatrical performance of Trumpism, the call is about both sides of a phone call, where he would act out the call – he would call out these companies and play out a monologue where he would tell off the boss – his followers are enamoured. The snake was a performance about inviting a snake, and in its symbology, the woman is the snake. The woman picks up the snake, the snake bites her, and the snake says you know what I was. A metaphor for immigrants, notably South Americans, suggests that if you let them in, they will bite you, which is followed by a list of martyrs for the cause. The bullet plays out like how a terrorist executes its victim, Trump being the executioner – he has 50 rebels, notably Muslims of war; Trump takes 50 bullets and dips them in pig blood, he shoots 49 of the prisoners [crowds cheers, it’s not righteous violence, it’s an ecstatic lust for violence] he leaves one bullet. He tells the last prisoner to return that to your leader and tell them what I will do.

On January 6, 2021, this lust for violence was played out in an initiation when Ashli Babbitt [military veteran] was shot during an attack on the U.S. Capitol. She was wearing a trump flag like a cape with an American flag backpack; she tried to lead a charge for the Capitol and came across a broken window. A black police officer shoots her on the spot. The whole storming of the Capitol is a setup where security allowed a mob to storm the Capitol. It’s further reinforced in this hoax of a black man killing innocent white women is the story of the birth of the nation, 1915 [a lynching story]. The first movie ever screened in the white house was of a white woman fleeing a black man. The hero who leaps to save her is the Ku Klux Klan. It’s worth noting here that both KKK and (Black Panthers) Black Lives Matter work for the same federal agency. We’ve been divided by ideology, propaganda, and theatre. Ashli Babbitt becomes the martyr, but she is not the end-stage martyr. She keeps the cross warm until Trump hoists himself up there.

On the verge of the upcoming U.S. election, Trump becomes his martyr as a survivor of an assassination attempt. It’s ironic since his theoretical performance of the bullet, real bullets rained down on him. What’s surprising is that the shooter was registered as a Republican and predominantly conservative. One can surmise that the shooter saw the distinct threat that reactionary fundamentalism has on actual conservatives.

Charlton Heston played Moses on screen and, before he died, was an advocate for the National Rifle Association. Again, he symbolised Moses as the Father of the NRA or at least Moses’s dead spirit. In Deuteronomy 34, Yahweh kills Moses, and his successor is Joshua, a Westernised name for Yashua – Moses doesn’t go to the Promised Land; Yashua brought the Jewish people across the Jordan River to the Promised Land. In Deuteronomy 34:

12

And for all the mighty power and the great deeds of terror that Moses did in the sight of all Israel.

.

In other words, Moses was acting like a terrorist; after the death of Moses, we get Joshua. Why was it not written as Yashua? “Josh” is a joke; it is a joke about Jesus and Christians. In Psalm 47, the Lord most high is terrible – in this distinction, the Lord most high is the Demiurge; therefore [true] God was something else. John 8:44 – “You worship the devil” Yashua kept challenging Moses’s Law by stating that they guard the gate and do not let people in and that they worship the devil. 

Psalm 47

For the Lord most high is terrible; He is a great King over all the earth. He Shall subdue the people under our feet. He shall choose our inheritance for us, The excellency of Jacob whom he loved. God is gone up with a shout, The Lord with sound of a trumpet. Sing praises to God, sing praises: Sing praises unto our King, sing praises. For God is the King of all the earth

.

The shooter of Trump’s Assassin was too young to buy a Rifle, so he asked his Father, in religion, Moses is known as Father Moses or Am-ram. The rifle is a substitute for the ram and a death instrument. The whole assassination attempt seems to be legitimate, not staged; only upon the failed assassination attempt did the anointed ritual become something synchronistic and pre-determined.

It is said that Ahrimanic powers will incarnate in human form during a divisive time in people’s lives. It’s no surprise that Trump is starting to resemble Steiner’s description of Ahriman.

.

Some QAnon followers have put Trump as a mythological figure to whom they pray; Trump himself plays like a comic book hero arc or a Christ-like figure that will deliver them from evil. Of course, in the last presidency, he never fulfilled his promises. Of course, these followers and their partners and friends see their partner go down a deluded rabbit hole as they get all this conspiratorial and quasi-gnostic secret knowledge all in one go, unlike those who have been slow-dripped for the last three decades.

Trump’s nickname is DON, and he has also been known as time traveller “John Titor” [research this if you want to go further down the rabbit hole]. Don is also referred to as the leader of a mafia, and it is said that the presidency role is a leader for the cartels, as the country’s true leader is a deep state organisation. Don also stands for the days of Noah; such attributes imply the floods and the sea, and today, it is merely the sea of information. QAnon followers are getting a sea of information they’re not ready to parse. You see this when they mythologise him as a saviour when it’s closer to an antichrist supposition.

You can currently observe similar behaviour in modern Christian nationalist extremists who resemble the Pharisees in their efforts to impose laws resembling Sharia law. As the 2025 project document outlines, these actions will severely limit women’s freedoms. One clear example of this is when victims of rape are legally compelled to carry and deliver their babies.

Fascism in 2024 is not fascism in 1933. America is not Germany. For Germany, it was a regime. Today, it’s a movement. Evangelical Anglican historian Butler wrote a book, “white evangelical racist”, which describes the promise of whiteness. It can seduce even black folks into thinking they can be part of this power. As examined by Civil War Church institutions, their members are openly white supremacists who look forward to another civil war; they are armed, but at the same time, a portion of them are diverse and of colour. They are drawn in; this means fascism has gravity and power, which also means that modern fascism is not quite the race purity project of Germany in 1933.

Magic is Real – Magic Before Christ Era: In 630 BCE, a framework for one of the first monotheistic religions was born in Persia called Zoroaster, based on worshipping an advanced being called Ahura Mazda, who he saw a vision at the age of thirty. Ahura Mazda taught Zoroaster the cardinal principle of “Good Religion.” Followers of Zoroastrianism were called the Magi (the Wise Men). In English, the term Magi originates from the words magic and magician. Despite its small number of current adherents, Zoroastrianism has played a colossal role in studying comparative religions. It influenced Vedic Hinduism and the development of Judaism and Christianity.     

The principles of karma in Hinduism and Buddhism have similarities in Zoroastrianism, where good transpires for those who do righteous deeds. Those who do evil have themselves to blame for their ruin. Zoroastrian morality can be summarized in the simple phrase, “good thoughts, good words, good deeds,” and in that order. Thoughts are primary because, from one’s thought system, behaviour follows. Active participation in life through good thoughts, words, and deeds is necessary to ensure happiness and keep the chaos at bay. This active participation of adherents is a central element in Zoroaster’s concept of free will.    

A Roman Elder named Pliny was a first-century author, naturalist and philosopher. Alongside being a naval commander, Zoroaster imparted as the “inventor of magic”. Historians came to this conclusion based on over “two million lines” written about Zoroaster contained in the Ancient Royal Library of Alexandria. Tragically, the Christian Roman Emperor Theodosius I ordered this library destroyed in 391 CE. After this destruction of the library, a resurgence of Zoroaster’s “magic” occurred in the 13th century. It mainly came about through the Cathars who lived in Southern Europe. Cathars were a cult group resonating on the principles of being hermetically sealed from the world, a group that refrained from sensual pleasures and lived highly austere lifestyles. It is believed that they gained mystical powers at the back end of this philosophy and spirituality. As a result, made, the Pope of that time ordered a crusade:

Pope Innocent III, who lived from 1161 until 1216, ordered brutal crusades against heretics he viewed as threats to the Catholic Church, including the Muslims and the Cathars. It is sad to note when the “power” of Zoroaster’s “magic” once again began to reappear in the world, the threat to Christianity was then undeniable, and it prompted the pope to order a massacre of Catholic noncombatant civilians. The scale of slaughter in Europe was not duplicated until the horrors of World War II. The most infamous quote from the Albigensian Crusade in southern France was, “Kill them all. God will recognise his own.” But even a wholesale slaughter of those practising the principles of Zoroastrianism could not stamp it out. These mystical practices went underground during the Middle Ages. – Brad Olsen, Modern Esoterica

.

Its strongest critics regarding both Zoroaster and Taoism ideas come from Christian fundamentalist that has an agenda to consolidate any wisdom resonating from occult understanding as the doctrine of demons. This closes the door for any wisdom that may help an individual, with born-again sects that utilise NDE experiences to born-again Christians by enhancing or introducing false narratives in their recollection or expertise. They usually outline the “I” assertion with seeing the spirits of Buddha or Lao being engulfed in a pit of hell because they didn’t have Christ in their heart. This group first popped up on Christian TV and is now on the internet video platform. Not only do they get the timeline of existence of these masters wrong as they were around before Christ had appeared, but they impart a sense of internalised racism towards their followers.        

This mechanism is apparent as it replicates itself in Western society, splitting it further from the fractured state it has now. As an example, currently, we have the mgtow movement with passport bros looking overseas for conservative Asian women as partners. In contrast, Western women have become chauvinistic, entitled and deeply out of touch with the world, along with having possible personality disorders. The internalised racism I’m arguing about stems from the principles of exclusive religiosity towards a messianic deity and, as a result, create a dark reflection. Examined, surprisingly, Western women who are not white, Asian women who demonise Asian men as well as refusing to date them as a result, demonise the traditions they come from. They’ve ultimately cut off the hermetic understanding of the union of opposites or being aware that there are no real differences between the outside and the inside or as within so without.  

This dark reflection is often based on the demoralised perspective that morality began in post-Jesus/Christ times, and anything before that, like democracy, civilisations, and society itself, is a falsehood. It is either that or not as valid in a post-Christ Era. Does god exist as an argument, or is a question a non-starter for Atheists as they believe it does for people who believe in it? They believe in the people that do rather than a greater deity itself and are unswayed by the awareness of human existence and life itself as an appreciation for the substantiation of god. Basically, in other words, that miracle of life is not enough to validate the existence of god. Atheists can see this irrational approach as a debased version of utilitarianism mysticism. 

According to the Vatican, Limbo, the destination of the unbaptised children, is now non-existent. According to the Church, Limbo no longer exists, and it was an error on their part to claim that souls go there if you are not baptised. To Catholic Christians, it is an ontological error to say it no longer exists because it had been as real to them as anything else. Catholic mothers whose children died before the baptism could occur had the hopeful knowledge their child’s soul was resting in this place of Limbo. Such news becomes disheartening to many Catholic mothers whose children have died, and now, no such place exists.

It is a weird, twisted parallel insofar as they can change fundamental metaphysical beliefs. In early history, some aspects were for profit, having moral superiority to alter or claim something exists or don’t exist for a corrupt agenda in the guise of good needs to be stopped. The argument is that everything in a post-Christ Era, and post-Christ Era as a faculty, is more significant or more true and superior to life before it (this thinking is more prevalent in protestant fundamentalist thinking). It is a mirror practice to the Vatican’s claims of moral and meta-physical change, which are mind-forged maniacal thinking. As a result, common sense, reason, and decency rebel against these forms of mind pollution.

These pollutions are prevalent in protestant fundamentalism because they can hijack common sense, reason, and decency to their type of post-Christ Era utilitarianism intermingled with coincidences (without the mysticism) used as a consequence of sin. As a result, natural disasters or sickness on people are the result of that sin (not by a natural mechanism of nature) but by God (but really by them as a cult group raising hysteria) on their criteria of sin?      

It does not come to their attention that a type of Christianity was around before the Christ Era. Many devout believers consider the Holy Book the literal truth, direct from the creator God, Yahweh, or any different name. Others treat the Bible with great respect but believe that it was written by human beings and, as such, is a complex and often contradictory document. Modern scholars believe that the Hebrew Bible, or Tanakh, was composed by four or five writers between 1000 and 400 BCE based on much older traditions.   

.

.