Christianity as a Doomsday Cult:

.

.

---

.

It’s an Apocalypse [Originally posted on 6th May 2018]: Fundamentalist Christianity and, to a lesser extent, mainstream Christianity have an offset base or a counterpoint in their beliefs, predominately about the anti-Christ and the second coming. It could be shocking to hear that it’s a lie perpetrated by the Jesuits 400 years ago. Modern terminology for this kind of scenario is called Futurism. The second coming isn’t mentioned in scripture and the Bible. The power of people believing in that notion has a consequence: fundamentalism; it becomes a tool to invalidate a fear-based program.         

For some, the notion of an anti-Christ is like Atheism, a passé afterthought, which means you have broken away from the shackles of mind control. Human-directed evils often led by the elites and their magic(k) perpetuating the outcome result in many upheavals that people must face and overcome even though they’re inherently part of the game or play, whether conscious or unconscious. When they’re aware of it, their suppressed guilt creates a scapegoat to deflect their manifestations of culture that in many ways can be evil – to a Lucifer and Satan figurehead. Perhaps being stuck between the polarities of an existing mythical figurehead and something that’s been made up – is a new type of demoralization. And working on your individuation is the key to being free from it because to say that such a mythical figurehead cannot exist is too easy. There is the notion in Gnosticism of a divine experiment, and maybe this is all a means to obstruct you from reaching the divine experiment. 

Those in that mental frame are still demoralized; in The Matrix, Morpheus says, “a prison for your mind”, or another way to describe it is that people live in the cave, from the Greek myth allegory of the cave. So often, those managers of perception that keep you in the cave’s sole purpose is to come up with ideas to control your thoughts in the cave. When there is so much more outside the cave, their ideas are to instil anti-enlightenment and anti-science (not science for the betterment of humanity, but science through scientism, which advocates criminal capitalism). Also, futurism, technology, and seemingly (although unlikely) promote the entrapment of souls or consciousness to an artificial machine or a man’s version of a simulation. And promote the idea of loving your state and obeying its every whim when institutions like religion are a means to keep your spirit shackled.

And this is by no means an anti-Christian manifesto. Still, it is just a means of reporting what viewpoints are out there and that fundamentalism/evangelism and, to a lesser extent, mainstream Christianity can’t be excluded from the conspiracy they love to wield. No matter how much the Christian-Conspiracy-Groups want to believe in their solipsistic/inverse-solipsistic fantasy of exclusion. I aim to convey such exclusions do not exist. And to better understand why through one’s process. In much the same way as I described in the analogy of Shakespeare’s quote: “Love goes toward love, as schoolboys from their books; but love from love, toward school with heavy looks,” written in part two of this thesis.

Mysticisms go hand in hand with ”Myth” while Eschatology goes hand in hand with fundamentalism. And this is why esoteric or mystical Christianity has always been at odds with ecclesiastical authority. The Gnostics were one such group. So, this aspect of history is the template for Christians with a mystical fascination to exclude themselves from the churches instead of being excluded by them. This could explain the rise of esoteric Christianity. While fundamentalist conspiracy groups do the very opposite, they impose fear of knowledge and obedience to a (non-existent) Church of Christianity, whatever that may be. Why is there such a division between Christianity’s mystical and eschatological streams? The reasons are complex and varied – one aspect is that Eschatology, or ”the study of the last things,” deals with the end of time and the last judgement.

Most of these end-of-times mindsets came from John Nelson Darby, the founder of Plymouth Brethren, a small evangelical sect. He argued that when properly rearranged and reinterpreted, specific Bible verses revealed a system of seven ages of ‘dispensations’ and detailed predictions of the world’s end. The details in his 12-volume books, which circulated in the United States, resulted in a massive following. This gave way to fundamentalism, and soon, fundamentalist churches would become the core reactionary political movement.

The End of Times is also [exemplified by the verse in the Lord’s Prayer that says, “Thy kingdom come,” this view implies that the kingdom is not here (not here on earth, at any rate), but that it will be established here sometime in the (perhaps imminent) future. Much of early Christianity was preoccupied with this eschatology. Paul wrote 1 Thessalonians, the oldest text in the New Testament, to deal with his disciples’ concerns about their loved ones who died before the Lord’s return. Some scholars, most famously argued that Jesus himself belonged to this camp.   The Mystical Stream on the other hand, evokes a verse cited earlier “The kingdom of heaven is within you.” From this perspective, the End of Time is far less crucial. If the kingdom of heaven is truly within us, why do we need to wait for the last judgement to find it? This was the perspective of the Gnostics as well as many esoteric Christians ever since.   Seen from the perspective of two thousand years of history, the case for eschatological view is a weak one. The current din about the End of Times that we hear in best sellers an on TV programs is nothing new: Christ’s imminent return has been proclaimed unceasingly since his own time. And yet Christ has never returned. At this point we can suspect that he never will – at least not in any form that would be recognizable from popular imaginings.   Mystical experience, on the other hand, is verifiable. The encounter with the inner Christ has been described and discussed countless times over the last millennia. It has been granted to countless times over the last two millennia. It has been granted to devoted seekers as well as to many people who did not ask for it and did not want it. In fact, mystical experience is far common than is generally believed. If it is ignored or dismissed, it is largely because people often do not know what to do with it.   And yet, against all evidence and against all experience, the eschatological view has consistently triumphed, both institutionally and in the popular mind. Among the authorities, its appeal is obvious. Absent Christ himself, the priests and ministers remain as his vicars and stewards. They would not be nearly so necessary if everyone were aware of his or her own direct inner contact with the divine.   In the popular mind eschatology is attractive largely because it is easy to understand. Jesus will descend from the skies in cloud and majesty, to be joined by the raptured faithful. Resurrection is not the resurrection of a spiritual body but the resurrection of the flesh, the literal rising of corpse from their graves. (And yet, as we have seen, Paul explicitly says. “it is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body,” a curious instance in which a central teaching of a religion is explicitly denied by its own scriptures.) Esoteric Christianity, with its mysterious talk of subtle bodies and inner lights, seems baffling by contrast.   There is much talk now about the resurgence of evangelical Christianity – which is eschatological Christianity – in America today. But whatever the situation may look like in the short term, in the long run the tide may be turning against the eschatological perspective. Science is a Key factor. It is much harder to believe that the world will end tomorrow now that we know it has been around for several billion years. (No doubt this helps explain the antipathy many evangelical Christians feel toward science.) And while it may seem that conventional science detests nothing more thoroughly than mysticism, the two may prove to be allies in the end. In their different ways, they both rely on empirical investigation, certainly their methods vary – one relies on reproducible research, the other on meditation and introspection – but they may still find meeting point. We may even find, soon or in some remote time to come, that the long-sought grand unification theory somehow reconciles the two. -Richard Smoley, Jay Kinney, Hidden Wisdom]

.

The Jesuits planned for a second coming of Christ, but this was thwarted by the event being centuries overdue. In the current century, a similar scenario is emerging, involving futuristic technology that aligns with our modern understanding of futurism. During the Watergate era, a proposal from the White House involved surfacing a submarine off the coast of Cuba and using holographic (Blue Beam) technology to create an illusion of the second coming of Christ. The aim was to disrupt communication channels long enough to facilitate a military invasion by the American forces. I suspect this mission was ultimately scrapped, but it could have played a role in the events surrounding 9/11.

This information remained secret until the attempt to use a hologram to simulate a plane during 9/11 failed to convince the public. While the Blue Beam theory is often dismissed as a hoax, the technology itself is accurate, making such scenarios plausible, especially among white Christians in the South American region. Many would likely believe it, as there are still individuals who insist that actual planes struck the towers on 9/11.

Of course, fundamentalist Christian conspiracy groups would be the first to figure out it is fake and make it known to mainstream Christians. And conveying the hoax of the second coming is based mainly on rituals financed by an oligarchy and is Orwellian in nature. There was some spiritual backlash, mainly towards anything open to spirit, presumably the New Age. Some may or may not believe it, but those that don’t believe in such a thing – will be cleverly truth-managed; fundamentalist conspiracy groups are in front of any dramatically changing worldview, which gives them a kind of safety net. It’s a vicious circle because the truth is always cornered and often profited when adequately marketed.

There is a doomsday, but a gradual one: This doomsday hides as an Altruistic program: fluoride in the water to help with teeth, Chemicals in the air to reduce global warming, GMA in foods to help with health, and mercury-filled vaccines to help us with flu. And propaganda, flags and hoaxes to establish a false evil (ISIS) conjured by them to promote false truths and obedience, increase militancy (both state and country) for protection, and so forth. Most of these agendas are well known among conspiracy circles but are also surface-layer stuff, and the deep-layered stuff is out there for you to realise.

Then there is the artificial doomsday scenario (as depicted in Watchman’s time clock illustration of a timer reading five minutes before 12) in which a nuclear disaster would become something real – between the superpowers of the United States and the Soviet Union. Then, of course, there are other doomsday upheavals presumably natural in origin, like the global warming hoax (melting ice caps, which are the effect of men’s progress to industry). Still, Global warming is about reaching a specific time in the Earth’s cycle. Other scientists claim there is a global cooling down – Teutonic earthquakes, the sinking of continents, meteor objects colliding with Earth from outer space, and so on.

There is also this attempt for one unifying religion to adhere to. Yet, at the same time, there is a new conditioning method to promote that believing in religion is the effect or cause of mental illness. And this is a gradual doomsday in the metaphysical sense where your faith and spirituality is under attack.

Christian fundamentalism and any minor agents of the oligarchy controllers are small factions of a bigger game from an even higher controller. As I said, truth is cornered, and nothing can grow positively. When religion is declared a mental illness, according to the American Psychological Association (APA), the APA is in the business of control and not so much in science.

Their reasoning is due to a five-year study from the APA about devout religious people who often suffer from anxiety, emotional distress, hallucinations, and paranoia. And those who perceived God as punitive were directly related to their health. In contrast, those who viewed God as benevolent did not suffer as many mental problems. It would also seem that the article in which this story comes from implies through their article photo that devoutly religious are disproportionately poor and non-white.

Furthermore, APA will lobby to legislate doctors the right to force life-saving treatment on those who refuse it for spiritual reasons because they are mentally incapable of making decisions about their health. This will open the door to numerous possibilities, and not the good kind; it will allow any religious/spiritual belief of any kind as an excuse to declare a patient unfit. And this seems ridiculous when it has been proven that religious/spiritual belief contributes to emotional and mental health. This aspect is accurate, and a whole article can be written about it, proving it legit.

Gregg Braden, often associated with the New Age movement, explains in his lectures about a field of energy that holds everything together and that humans are part of that field, with our bodies being the source that holds it together. He also outlines the importance of emotion being the language that translates quantum possibilities to realities of our physical world. This field is also known as the divine Matrix.

Gregg Braden exemplifies his explanation about focused thoughts and emotions by showcasing a video of a woman with cancer (a tumour in the abdomen) being healed in less than five minutes with focused thoughts and emotions. This incident was held in China. There was also a claim found in Christian channels of a woman who had leukaemia. She listened to the Gospels at the behest of her husband. She listened to it every day. The good news was that she eventually improved, and her cancer went into remission. This comes from Christian channels of whom other experiences are cleverly selected to set up bias. For example, a Buddhist who had a near-death experience and his vision came across the road on which he saw a pit, and in the pit, he saw Buddha grasping for help. What he is trying to infer is that Buddha was in damnation because he didn’t have Christ in his heart (it’s funny because Buddha died centuries before the appearance of Christ) – fundamentalist propaganda working as an agent to inflate the uncertainty of spirit. But I digress because it’s about positive thoughts and emotions; therefore, you won’t see the APA considering this aspect.      

Perhaps it’s a last-ditch effort by the seemingly dead (New) Atheist movement to spark a new ascendancy – [to speculate] align themselves with institutions like the APA. Because if mocking, attacking and insulting people’s beliefs (Dawkins comes to mind) don’t work – then let’s be more insidious about it.

The New Atheist movement is essentially the project of the cultural left; it’s their religious project. Religion doesn’t have to be theistic. [A religion is simply a system of belief that is used to bind a community together. Communism and Nazism were religions they were consciously designed to be as much].

The cultural left has been trying for decades to co-opt the old mainstream Protestant denominations and, in some cases, succeeded. At particular times, they seized power over various hierarchies of the Episcopal, Lutheran, and Presbyterian denominations. And in doing so, advocating explicit leftist reforms in the canon bylaws, the parishioners abandoned the churches in droves. This cause resulted in the Left ruling with no kingdom, and now the effect of all of these resulted in a radical polarization of American religion, with Fundamentalists, Evangelicals and Pentecostals on one side and secularists, agnostics and atheists on the other.

Fundamentalists, however, have a new focus – their energies are focused on the head hydra of the Roman Catholic Church. To seemingly make known their Pagan roots, it must be exercised by their Fundamentalist churches using fundamentalist conspiracy groups as their soldiers.

At times, the fundamentalist solipsistic mindset adheres to a form of inverse-solipsistic saviour figurehead. Can, at times, lean to the political right movement while ignoring myths/truths and mysticism along the way. Using them but warping the interpretation to control a naïve population can, at times, provoke a type of mental illness. However, this group and their ideology are small, similar to the size and scale of Atheist groups. Both are insignificantly small and yet the loudest – and believers of religion, in general, all have an inner strength and peace that even the hardest sceptic or (New)-Atheist may lack. This is more predominant in fundamentalist and ‘born-again’ types.

These small groups coincide with mainstream religion, especially fundamentalists. No one can identify the difference firsthand, and it can be regarded as part of the mainstream. Christianity as mainstream is where the focus is. And that focus is a sleight of hand – an illusion to set your focus on iconographic patsies that seem to align themselves as lifetime actors to play the role of a political leader or some other false hero. While this misdirection is happening, [anonymous armies of think-tank and NGO-fed drones mindlessly work day in and day out to create an endless index of insidious menaces like these]. To declare believing in religion is a state of mental illness is absurd.

The mythical doomsday: It’s written in the Septuagint, Isaiah 13, the judgment against Babylon, The vision, which is Esau’s son of Amos Assar against Babylon

		23	I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was without form, and void; and the heavens, and they had no light.
		–	For the stars of Heaven and Orion and all the host of Heaven shall not give their light and shall be dark at sunrise and the moon should not give her light.
		24	I beheld the mountains, and, lo, they trembled, and all the hills moved lightly.
		–	Rejoicing at the same time and insulting a voice of many nations on the mountains.
		–	The earth shall be shaken from her foundation.
		25	I beheld, and, lo, there was no man, and all the birds of the heavens were fled.
		–	And day that is left shall be a flee in fon, and as a stray sheep, and there shall be none to gather them so that a man shall turn back to his people, and a man should flee to his own land.
		26	I beheld, and, lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness, and all the cities thereof were broken down at the presence of the Lord, and by his fierce anger.
		–	For the heaven shall be enraged and the earth shall be shaken from her foundation, because of the fierce anger of the lord of hosts.
		27	For thus hath the Lord said, the whole land shall be desolate; yet will I not make a full end.
		–	For behold the day of the lord is coming, which cannot be escaped a day of wrath and anger to make the world desolate, and to destroy sinners out of it.
		–	Therefore every hand should become powerless; every soul of Men should be dismayed.

.

Back then, they didn’t have motion pictures or cinematic universes to unload all their knowledge passed down through the centuries. Instead, they had monks in Babylon libraries conjuring mythological allegories – often from actual historical events and other times described through a fantastical setting. Then, revise it (or in the Matrix sequel – Reloaded) or give it a New 32 to coincide with its time. Even if you dismiss the symbolic meaning in these passages, their exoteric narratives often reveal common values entirely consonant with the Mystery traditions.

Richard Carrier, PhD, emphasizes in his lectures that the Gospels are fictional and that “fiction” can be synonymous with “myth.” His academic credentials are notable, highlighted by his PhD and numerous books discussing historical and religious inaccuracies. His perspective is overly simplistic and reductionist. Although I do not hold a PhD, Joseph Campbell would have provided a more nuanced examination of myth in his extensive work. Additionally, factual evidence, such as the discovery of giant human-like bones in archaeology, particularly in locations like Cydonia, challenges Carrier’s conclusions.

Moreover, many individuals report numerous UFO sightings and experiences that they interpret as prophetic dreams or encounters with spiritual entities, often described as night terrors, possession, or sleep paralysis. These experiences are supernatural or metaphysical and frequently intersect with our material reality. Therefore, categorizing myth entirely as fiction seems to reduce the complexity of truth and our world

Richard Carrier identifies several issues within the Gospels, using bullet points to outline their fallacies. These include a lack of proper historical structure, markers that suggest mythological elements, various improbabilities within the Gospels, and the absence of credible sources. At the same time, it is intriguing—and perhaps a humanist ideal—that anybody can study myths through criteria that connect with exegesis and align with modern myths and much older stories.

Militarism is a hallmark of the modern myth for the human and otherworldly figure: the Lord and his warriors are coming. The more you look back on historical myth, the more fantastical our world was once: Giants/Nephilim, Angels/Archons, a possible silicon world, giant trees and so forth. Most of those stories can’t be pigeonholed as fiction – so I’m convinced the Lord’s warriors are not just an allegory on war as a human story but something more literal: watchers/angels cast down becoming part of the human story. That resulted in a battle between the dark and the light. And this conflict spurred a polarity of hate throughout history, which never ends. 

In these narratives, myth writers convey the most incredible story ever told, while modern writers explore the facets of human life as potential extensions of that astonishing tale. War is one such aspect. From its inception to today, it involves soldiers or warriors who are part of something greater than mere patriotism—something more mythical. History recounts their stories and the moments that could have emerged or been thrust upon them.

The science fiction show Battlestar Galactica encapsulates this theme, which glorifies a militarized society engaged in an existential struggle against an entirely alien threat. The show introduces the concept of artificial intelligence, notably the Archons, understood around UFO circles as biological androids serving reptilian overlords. A central plot point of *Battlestar Galactica* is the idea that this cycle of events has occurred before and will happen again reiterated in several episodes. Interestingly, this concept aligns with Ecclesiastes 1:9: “What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.”

If immortals/gods/goddesses exist, then myths cannot die; they get re-interpreted. The only way it dies off is through the end of a cycle or an age. A catastrophic event like a flood could reset the human story for the better. However, the self-proclaimed rulers of the world often go underground or make their way to Caucus Mountains – then the whole play starts again with the same outcome. Ideologies, conversely, can die off, and at times, ideologies can be initiated through myths.

Fiction is a projection of reality and is simply a conjuring of writers to express our deepest fears, visions, beliefs and ideas in tangible forms such as a book or a film. The art of the period is usually a reflection of the time itself. Writers routinely draw from real places and actual events. Within these retellings, some notice the patterns that seem too frequent and consistent to be a coincidence and too prevalent to ignore – these recurring themes through symbolism are often at the behest of secret societies. A symbol’s meaning is useless when analysing a single retelling without context, and the timeline window has been altered; it’s challenging to discover which retelling is literal to that of the symbolic. However, if one is only concerned with the overlapping concept, the meaning surrounding the symbol becomes clear. This has limitations as the idea of telling the same story on repeat becomes less inspirational. 

The Lord of Hosts parallels the Solar Saviour/Horus, and identifying the Solar Saviour is another hallmark in myth. It often defines modern mythology because this Lord of Host is bringing down destruction. People would also assume he parallels with Enki (and for some Christians, he is also known as Lucifer/anti-Christ); it’s not clear in the Septuagint passages. The name title Lucifer denotes the planet Venus – and the Vulgate describes it as “the light of the morning”. The title was also applied as a metaphor for the King of Babylon (Isaiah 14:12) to the high priest Simon, son of Onias (Ecclesiasticus 50:6), and also Jesus Christ himself (2 Peter 1:19; Apocalypse 22:16; the “Exulted” of Holy Saturday) the true light of our spiritual life.

Thanos (a Marvel comic book character) alongside Mafista (a version of Satan in Marvel comics) seemingly resembles an infamous illustration of Satan and Christ on the mountain cliffside. It’s unsurprising to see dual/morphing archetypes in comic book characters. This questions the concept of Satan being Lucifer as more ambiguous or separate.

.

In some circles, predominately fundamentalist Christians, the Anti-Christ already exists and has a Jewish name – and all left is Armageddon followed by the return of Christ. Then, the victory of the good forces over the Anti-Christ is followed by the millennium rule of Christ, followed by the last judgement, which entails the end of the world and time. And this is the paradigm of the extreme wing of Christendom.

The secular has a similar scenario in which the end of history begins; this is a 19th-century notion linked to evolutionists (Darwin), which establishes history moving towards something, and this something is the end of history because there is no more development. This approach sees history as a sort of evolution. First, it evolves to an inevitable end. It stops – much like Marxists view the ultimate rule of the proletarian being established in which millions have to be slaughtered, but never came, then it’s the end of history. When considering symbolic truths, the former has more merit than the latter.

When you view history through the matrix of time of not existing, history is not a consideration; it’s what Mercia Iliad calls the refusal of history or the myth of the eternal return. This myth is not Western and is more related to ancient southern India. The myth has two concepts: the first is about cosmic spiritual cycles (in Greek word cycles means Serpent). Therefore, cycles denote a circular concept of time, returning to your origins. The ancient Hindus discuss chronological cycles that are millions of years old, categorized as munvanta, culpas, yugas, etc. At the present moment, we are in the Kali cycle, the Dark Age. The Kaliyuga cycle entails an age of materialism. Eventually, these cycles pass and head towards a new vast cycle, a cosmic reincarnation of the world. The second concept is Karma (in San script, it means action), which is the cause of existential evils and slowly minimizes suffering within reincarnation. Mercia Iliad suggested that perhaps this concept was devised as a way to accept total liberation. So, when a person looks at these vast, incredible schemes, it forces them to change their worldview. And this is liberation, although liberation not within time, but from time, not curing suffering, but instead rising above it and out of it.

In talking about cycles and reincarnation, one must understand to get there, one must understand death. In the Avengers-Infinity-War case, it’s about death and sacrifice. I don’t know the conceptual artist for the film Avengers-Infinity-War; it seems they got inspiration from a painting by Manly P. Hall in his 1928 book “The Secret Teachings of All.” Manly P. Hall is an author/teacher of Alchemy. The language of Alchemy is the crux of Avengers-Infinity-War; more precisely, this scene combines Pagan ritual death sacrifice and an alchemical fermentation process. The fermentation process starts with the inspiration of spiritual power from above that re-animates, energises, and enlightens the alchemist. Then, out of the blackness of Putra-faction comes the yellow ferment, which appears like a golden wax flowing out of the bowel matter of the soul. 

In the film, a bright, shiny yellow stone (soul stone) appears in his hand as Thanos wakes up from a blackout after the ritual. Manly’s book cover illustrates a middle point between above and below (Heaven and Earth). A reinterpretation of the ferryman guides Thanos as not being an alchemist or maybe it hints more towards Anubis. Lastly, within the scene is a monolith akin to the 9-11 Twin Tower. Many conspirators also regard the 9-11 events as a Stargate – Gamora is sacrificed, depicting a fall that mirrors people falling from the Twin Tower buildings. The 9-11 event was transcribed in pop culture media decades before it happened–it seems it’s still being transcribed in the entertainment media post-9/11.   

The myth of Giants having had a hand in destroying the Earth has always been retold. Unfortunately, in our modern age, it acts as a retelling for entertainment, possibly propaganda, but often synch-masters will tell you those news/films/ TV shows as entertainment don’t tell the truth; instead, they tell a coded truth.    

In Genesis 6:4 – compared to Septuagint: Esaiah 13

		4	There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of  God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
		–	Giants are coming to fulfill my wrath.

.

The Book of Enoch, excluded from the Biblical canon, references a group of heavenly beings known as the Watchers. Among these Watchers is a faction of fallen angels who occasionally descended to teach humans about arcane arts. However, Enoch is generally not regarded as canonical in most Jewish or Christian traditions. This lack of recognition is likely due to its reliance on Lebanese (or Phoenician) magic and folklore rather than authentic Jewish sources.

Many Christians today believe that the Watchers were interdimensional beings that entered our world through gates or portals. This phenomenon is said to be associated with Babylon, a city whose name means “Gateway of the Gods.” This perspective raises the possibility that interpretations of the Book of Genesis regarding the end times have fallen out of favour with both Jews and Christians. The Book of Enoch, discovered among the Essene literature hidden in the Qumran caves, reinforces Essene Literature made evident by the Dead Scrolls.

When Joshua and the nation of Israel entered the Land of Canaan, they were instructed to wipe out certain men, women and children of certain tribes. According to the story, the tribes they killed were non-human hybrids called the Nephilim – and their height was said to have reached between 10 to 30 feet. These were the offspring of spiritual beings and are said to be the primary reason God sent the flood. Satan knew about the prophecy that would defeat him. Before any of the prophets came to explain how it would occur, the only thing Satan knew was that the Messiah was going to be human. The Nephilim was an attempt to infiltrate the entire bloodline of humanity so that the Messiah could not be a full-blooded man. And this would have worked if not for Noah and his family. When Abraham found out from God that the land of Canaan was to be given to Abraham, Satan also found out, which resulted in the Nephilim being around for 400 years, attempting to thwart God’s plan of God. From the Genesis text, it would seem that they were around before and after the flood.

The New Age circles, who mainly abide by the notion of being ‘spiritual but not religious,’ see it through the evolution of consciousness. Between the fall of Atlantis and the dawn of the first civilization (Sumerians and Egypt 4,500 BC), there was a 6,500-year gap. During this time, it was about consciousness evolution (in scientific terms, waiting for codons to switch on in the human DNA – and DNA is described as the physical soul) – the wait in evolution had to happen to be ready for the next set of instalment (knowledge) of the Human play. Around this time, the flood occurred and is said to be caused by the hyperreal notions of pole shifts and the precession of the equinox. This incident would have caused an ice age, and afterwards, it would melt, causing floods. (I believe something happened to cause three-day darkness or a void, but I don’t think it was a polar shift).

Researchers were still trying to understand how ancient Sumerians and Egypt evolved rapidly during the dawn of the first civilizations. Therefore, they categorized that civilization’s evolution as a stair-step evolution. Other researchers who lean toward esotericism describe their leap in knowledge and technology as something otherworldly given to them by (some beings).

According to Thoth, every level of consciousness has its consciousness grid and chromosome chain. The higher level of consciousness correlates with height, which is the primary difference between those particular DNA factors (codons). The second level of consciousness has 44 and two chromosomes, which is where we are right now, with the average height for men 6-7 feet tall / women 5-6 feet tall. The third level has 46 and two chromosomes (the height in men is 14-16 feet tall, and women are 10-12 feet tall. The fourth level translates to 48 and two Chromosomes, which is 33-35 feet tall in women and 30-32 feet tall. A being named Metatron (a Hebrew Archangel) reached 55 feet tall – It’s written in the Book of Enoch – (Book 3. Chapter 1) that Enoch was transformed into an Arch Angel Metatron. The book describes Metatron spreading his wings. I guess what is being questioned here is whether Angels (Sons of God) came in unto female humans – an allegorical story for Gene’s manipulation.   

The illustration on the left depicts Metatron with his wings; those wings are said to be accurate in a literal sense. The illustration on the right is a Celestial character (cosmic entity) from Marvel Comics – a creation from Jack Kirby specifically from ‘The Eternals’. In the film Guardians of the Galaxy, from which the image is taken, the collector describes,’ only beings with extraordinary strength can brandish the (power) stone’. (The stone is on top of Celestial Giant’s staff). While there is no significant aesthetic similarity, it’s about the relatability in archetypes, in this case, ‘Giants’- the Giant Metatron Archetype is the very peak of Giants.

.

Thanos was said to be half an Eternal being, a mutation (a deviant among his people); his premise for domination or to make the universe perfectly balanced by destroying half the population in the universe was for Death, on her orders. (Death is a Marvel character – a sort of goddess of Death or time, representing Kronos in female form. Thanos becomes infatuated and falls in love with ‘Death’). He acquired the stones and the Gauntlet in the comics and the film. With it, he destroyed half the population with a finger click; however, some of the remaining half-remembered people had disappeared, a mandala effect scenario). In the film, the Celestials destroyed the planet Titan; in the comics, Thanos eventually destroyed the planet. The film outlines Thanos’s mission to persuade the leaders of his world, Titan, to destroy half the population and save it. His people denied him; now, his calling or mission is to destroy half the population in the universe – by acquiring all the infinity stones (which seems to be a symbolic concept of the Alchemical philosopher’s stone split into six). Thanos would then be known as the ‘Mad Titan.’

Thanos is a Giant, although not a peak Giant, but a Giant that stands around 14-16 feet tall (in the third level). Thanos is coming to destroy half the life of the world ordained by ‘Death,’ does that sound familiar? In Esoteric/Gnostic teachings, there is a triune story of IS(IS), RA, and EL: Israel; ISIS – the mother Goddess; RA – the Sun; El – the Demiurge. The Demiurge represents God, the construct of this world, and Saturn (rings) binds it together as Saturn represents (Father) Time. The God of this world is the Demiurge, not the True God, and he ultimately loves Blood. Blood represents the inner spirit coursing through our bodies. It constitutes the breath of life on all spiritual levels. ‘Death’ represents the Demiurge or Saturn (Cronus), Mafista represents Satan, Celestials are peak Giants, and Thanos is both […]

The retelling of Giants is nothing new and will most likely continue. From Cronos and Cyclops in Wrath of the Titans to the Giant in the hypersexual anime film ‘Urotsukidoji: Legend of the Overfield’. This seems to be a copy of the anime series Evangelian to the artificial celestial size of tech-Giant Pacific Rim. However, Evangelian thought pilots were spiritually linked with their Giants. And the Giants already had a sense of the spirit while also being mechanized. Pacific Rim stripped that away and made the giants more Machines, leaving only the pilots with a sense of spirit. Then, there is the Giant in ‘Jason and the Argonauts to the Giant Apollo in the original Star Trek episode ‘Who Mourns for Adonais.’ To children’s stories, Jack and Beanstalk, Spielberg’s BFG, and the cartoon Iron Giant. All repeated representation from myth and probably the Book of Giants, in which Giants are mentioned in the tale of ‘Gilgamesh’ and the list continues … Allegorically, it’s all still about Giants.

Scott Weiland (who died in 2015) was a prominent grunge singer in the 90s with the band Stone Temple Pilots. He sums up this exploration well with his last track from the first album ‘core’ – especially the Chorus; the song itself is open interpretation – I’m comparatively using it as an example in both a literal and ethereal sense.

.

I wanna be as big as a mountain

I wanna fly as high as the Sun

I wanna know what the rent is like in Heaven

I wanna know where the river goes

.

• The burgeoning Flat Earth movement has determined that mountains with horizontal plains were once giant trees, perhaps chopped down by giants.

.

• Zack Snyder’s take on Frank Miller’s 300 represented giants. The sequel explained how Xerxes became a god-king due to a transformation bathed in Gold—and Gold has an alchemical meaning. Then there is the ancient astronaut theory of mining monoatomic gold to inevitably live longer, stronger, and more god-like.

.

• In Wrath of Titans, a scene in which Hades is talking to Kronos, although Kronos at the time seemingly looks like a pile of stones, the stones are shaped like giant heads contoured among the mountains—which is a coded message. Researchers have determined that rock formations that look like body parts are fossilised remains of Giants. Photos have been taken to resolve this.

.

• Alex Proyas’s Gods of Egypt depicts Horus and Set as giants with gold for blood. Reviewers and critics slammed it; perhaps it was too on the nose; people like their Gods as superheroes.

.

Michael Keefe.

.

… End of part three … to be continued.

_______________________

.

Evangelical Conquerors of Spirit and History:

.

.

---

.

There is an attempt from the Evangelical fundamentalist to evangelise people into the occult or cults, but not through understanding and meaning, but instead a warped version of (quasi-esoteric-Christian) control. When they discuss the Christian Church not advancing but in retreat from a world that threatens her – by a front of evil that takes many garbs, predominately by philosophers, psychologists, and psychiatrists that they are all in a conspiracy or part of that evil to push back the Christian Church. One questions what kind of Church they’re talking about because it certainly is not the Catholic Church, considering Protestants broke away from the Church centuries ago. When it happened, they were deemed satanic. Ironically, in our current times, Evangelism (which had its beginnings as Protestant renegades) has the delusion that they were all manifested out of God’s realm (a delusional exclusive viewpoint), and anything outside that viewpoint is satanic, including the Catholic Church.

An offset of this mentality (or delusion) is found in racist Christians who love Hitler, who hate Jews, who love Jesus – one wonders if they’re aware of their hypocrisy because Jesus was a Jew. There is hypocrisy within the Church, especially towards a disdain for divination, but certain priests who expel demon possession is an act of divination in itself. The only fact separating them from Neo-Pagans or the Wiccan groups is that they have a badge or license to practice it with the permission of the Church. 

Fundamentalists’ mission now is to resist the force that threatens their (so-called Christian Church and) worldview with scriptures and their interpretations of that scripture to enforce the Word of God in its fullness and the spirit of life to be conquerors for Christ. (“Not by might nor by power, but by my spirit, says the lord of hosts” – Zechariah 4:6) I don’t know about you, but it never said to be conquerors for Christ in that verse, and that’s because they introduced an interpretation to that verse. They hope to answer anything that can warp their viewpoint (as Evangelical conquerors) by bending the interpretation of scripture for their will (or ideology), even if they contradict themselves.            

This mindset is similar to the Nazi regime of a master class, where propaganda was to change the hearts and minds of the people. From an outsider looking in, these types of people seem Alien, with their worldview slightly displaced from societal norms; it’s interesting to know then that it’s the same way they view people who are not within their Christian-right-fundamentalist-covenant group. They see outsiders (ordinary people with an affinity for occult understanding and, to a lesser extent, the truth) as human beings with flesh and blood, not supernatural caricatures. And they see the value in people but pity them simultaneously. That’s because they realise those people were not captured by the devil and, therefore, surrender their citizenship as human beings with spirit. However, instead, they identify with those people and see their value and worth to God and that all the resistance towards the fundamentalist warped worldview as Evangelical conquerors is due to their ignorance – (is it ignorance towards knowledge and truth? If it’s true, one must consider that the Christian right began as a radical racial movement and now acts as a judge of Western spirituality or as a spiritual-militant conqueror while inherently being a political movement).

The battle can’t be one by might or power, but through one’s spirit, it hints that the game of spiritual warfare will be one in either dimension. Our battle is not against flesh and blood but against powers and principalities (Eph. 6:12). It takes the Word of God, His beloved Son, and the incredible power of His Holy Spirit to defeat them. It must be a wonderful feeling to have such an unshakable faith. However, for outsiders looking in, that can adapt itself with the maxim of Shakespeare’s quote: “Love goes toward love, as schoolboys from their books; but love from love, toward school with heavy looks.” Lessons from the fundamentalist spiritual-police mindset that is in circulation align with evangelism. The meaning of this quote is entirely different from a love tragedy (Romeo and Juliet) context when seen in the context of truth (or for the seeker that seeks truth). ‘Love goes towards love’ can have meaning in the context of the law of attraction. But, on the other hand, it’s the antithesis that ‘hate begets hate.’ ‘As schoolboys from their books are about the naivety or ignorance towards knowledge as written in books or the seeking of knowledge untamed by youthfulness and discernment – because from birth to death you’re seeking knowledge; a natural process. And the verse ‘but love from love toward school with heavy looks.’ Explores having the answer before the question or being enlightened by the love and grace of God – at the same time, not having any gnosis, at which point one heads towards the school of mystery or gnosis, from the point of being already enlightened, is ‘the way.’ It also acts as a filter for better discernment. ‘With heavy looks’ is about doing the process but having your results look cool or creative; there is a hint of a type of vanity, but it is more precisely about the betterment and reflection of self and that deep down, it’s all just a game.      

In a world where truth is fluid and such certainties are in a constant state of transience, coupled with history, it starts to merge itself with myth, and history becomes genre-driven allegories. Where there is evidence to support that Jesus Christ existed and evidence to support that he didn’t – this is a dialectical polarity that one must face, considering that Christianity is the one unifying religion. There is no evidence to support that it’s in retreat. It just gets appropriated to another form of Christianity, but it’s Christianity. 

God spelt backwards is Dog; this is why we have the word ‘Dogma’, and the root word for God coming out of Europe is Goth in German, which gives us Gothic Cathedrals/architecture. In Scandinavia, the word for God is ‘Gut’; when you say you have a gut feeling, it is like saying God is telling you something. The word God is derived from Egypt’s ancient religion of a powerful divine being, Osiris. Osiris said that the gods came from the star system Sirius that came to Earth – and would instil a divine arrangement on Earth, notably in Egypt. And this is where we get the word ‘Sir’. It comes from Sirius/Osiris; Sirius is known as the ‘Dog Star.’  

There is a divine presence in the Universe that many have called God, and what the Gnostics call True-God or a divine Matrix. Suppose one is inclined to describe it as that. Unfortunately, this divine presence often gets misrepresented through ignorance and maybe other reasons like profit and power, but it’s more so with lacking knowledge.

Fundamentalist disdain is not necessarily towards researchers of the occult but actual practitioners of the occult as a magical craft; in history, the occult means hidden. It was the understanding that hidden knowledge was for the few that merged into many esoteric (cult) groups. In modern times, general knowledge is no longer hidden; however, it is safe to assume more hidden knowledge is still to be revealed (and you’re not part of the in-crowd), and general knowledge, once deemed occult, has become exoteric. Fundamentalists like to group magic with the occult. This includes both practices of black and white magic; this inclusive quality conflicts with ‘nature’ that is inherently magic itself.

The magic practice involves magicians having knowledge of one’s future and then holding it over them. To impose fear and gain is morally unjust, but equally unfair is to claim that eternity is only available through and in the faith of the one perfect Human Being. Anyone who has felt the light, gone through an awakening, and becomes enlightened knows this to be false (although becoming enlightened is a process of gnosis that never ends until upon death). And this is the unconditional love of God (agape), as described in scripture, and it’s very much divine. 

He considered that Jesus as a person is a symbolic story. He is a crucial symbol within the metaphor when he says, ” I am the way, the truth, and the life; no man cometh unto the Father but by me.” (John 14:6). What is the truth of all truth if it isn’t the light or the sun in a literal sense? In the dark, nothing is seen, but in the day (light), everything is seen. The Egyptian priest would go out early in the morning to sit and face the rising sun (the Risen Saviour or Horus). Horus would walk across the sky in twelve equal steps; Horus can be seen as Hours, becoming twelve hours; when it reaches noon, he becomes the highest god. The sun is in god’s temple at noon, and he is teaching men the light (Light in Latin is Lucius, Lucius in English is Luke. Luke was presented in Star Wars as Luke Skywalker, the light archetype of his father’s dark side/darkness, Darth Vader, the prince of darkness). When the light breaks through the dawn and the temple of noon, he is (en)light(ening) the human race. When the sun leaves, he leaves the world in the hands of the prince of darkness; in Egypt, the prince of darkness was called Set because it got dark at sunset. Christian Religion is a story between the Light and Darkness between Horus and Set.      

To be a Church or not to be a Church, that is the question: Fundamentalists realise occult practices within other Churches but exclude their Church because their Church is apart from any hierarchy or infiltration. There is no such thing as being apart from those hierarchies; we are all born with an assigned birth certificate, essentially giving your ownership of yourself to the sea, maritime law, and a corporation. They’re just imposing an idea and that idea of a perfect institution that can match the ideal human when that idea is just a unicorn. They make it clear that the true Church is in the body of Jesus (Col. 1:15-20; Eph. 6:12) and is the head of all principalities and powers. In other words, the true Church is in the heart of oneself [a seemingly protestant view]. The Church acknowledges that it can be both, but its doubtful Protestants would ever think that way. It’s, therefore, hard to associate institutions that define themselves as the true Church outside of Catholicism when that true Church doesn’t exist because it’s in the body of Jesus. So, it becomes a symbolic Church while simultaneously being an actual Church within the material realm. You see how they can slide back and forth between the two if their arguments become unanswerable.

They realise that those churches deemed infiltrated (except their churches because they’re incorruptible) are all going through apostasy, a state of corruption that rejects historical truths yet preserves outward appearances. It’s within context to assume, then, that a church can accept historical truths but helps play a role in shaping ideas (fundamentalism). The same ideas of those who infiltrated the Churches by advocating conspiratorial truths of those Churches while claiming they stand apart from them are similar to those truth media idols like Alex Jones.       

They realise most of the revolt doesn’t come from philosophers and science (which they deem satanic) but from behind the pulpit and theological seminaries. A seemingly true notion that any hardest sceptic can agree upon is that those who defend the faith through preaching the gospel are agents of a higher order, commissioned to proclaim it. [There is a division between the conservative theologians who seek to defend the faith and the liberal theologians who de-mythologise most of the substance of the Christian gospel and then re-mythologise it all over again, retaining only its moral and ethical values]. Ironically, the New Testament was re-written at the behest of the Catholic Church, and prior Bibles before that were extractions from Gnostic text and other sources that excluded cannon from other significant sources, all in the comfort of the Babylonian libraries.  

Aside from all the dialectic notions between the Churches, one explanation for the idea of the Church comes from the Scottish term ‘Kirk.’ In Star Trek, the captain is named Kirk, the starship captain of a ship named Enterprise, the Church Enterprise. That is why so many Churches are divided into denominations (except the fundamentalist Churches – because you know they morphed into this dimension from heaven). ‘Kirk’ refers to the Roman word ‘Ceres’, the name of a Roman goddess, mother Ceres. A name traced back to a more ancient goddess from the Greek mythologies named ‘Circe’, often described as a [goddess of magic or sometimes a nymph, witch, enchantress or sorceress in Greek mythology. By most accounts, she was the daughter of the sun god Helios and Perse, an Oceanid nymph -Wikipedia]. So, we have Mother Circe in Greece, Mother Ceres in Rome, and Mother Kirk in Scottish, which then became Mother Church in English. 

Mother Circe (in Greek mythology) was able to hypnotize people and bring them into her home; she would turn them into pigs and animals and then feed on them. This allegory has a symbolic similarity with the Mother Church enterprise or appropriation of other cultures’ spiritual beliefs – the early Church once referred to itself as “soldiers of Christ,” the word soldiers broken down is sold-to-die, sold to die in the name of Christ. This enterprise began around 1600 years ago with Emperor Constantine in the city of Nicaea (France); Constantine brought all the magic-practising priests of the Roman Empire to form the councils of Nicaea, the first councils in the early history of the Christian Church. For the reason of finding a way out of the decline of the Roman Empire, the Roman Empire appears much like modern-day America, and just like Rome, America is also in decline. 

Fundamentalists realise that the Church is divided and, therefore, see an opportunity for evangelical Christianity to present something it needs: to be a beacon of an undivided Christ and an unchanged gospel. They will not adhere to any notions of a ”new” evangelistic approach nor intermingle with other denominations like the Mormons because they feel those cults intend to bring destruction to orthodox Christianity. For all the fundamentalist Christian conspiracy groups who advocate their truth and their Church, this statement hints that the Church they wish to exist is in their fantasy realm because it’s non-existent. This reinforces the notion that fundamentalism is an idea, not a group per se, which makes it an ideology far more dangerous, but ideologies can be transient; they come and go.

What Sun-worship really is: There has never been the notion of sun worship in ancient times; however, the Sun has been used as a symbol of man’s concept of deity, and the Sun represents the idea about God that man holds within them. The Sun was a gift from the creator, and the people 6000 years ago appreciated that in a time when darkness seemed cold and dangerous to live in. The Sun itself is a giver of life that resides in the skies. The skies are also known as the heavens, so God’s son is in heaven. In ancient religion, the Sun was referred to as a risen saviour because, in the morning, the Sun would rise, and the Egyptians felt that their Sun was their saviour. From a biological viewpoint, the Sun is essential in keeping humans alive; hence, it has risen as a saviour. The Sun gives energy that plants and animals use to sustain life, and the Egyptians knew this. The Sun had different names at different times throughout the Egyptian Empire. When the Sun came up in the morning, the Sun was referred to as the newborn son, also known as Horus, which became Horus the Risen Saviour. And this is where the notion ‘the Sun comes upon the Horizon (Horus-Risen)’ originated. So, God loved the world and gave his only begotten Sun (Son) because there is only one Sun. When the Sun came up, everything was peaceful, but when it came down, chaos ensued as it was cold and the animals were in full swing, so this is where the notion of God’s Sun becoming the prince of peace (or ruler of all princi(e)-pality) comes from.         

Principality as a Christian angelology comes from the fifth-highest order of the nine-fold celestial hierarchy. In the Occult world, ideas are expressed through nine men, also known as the Council of Nine. The name title is expressed specifically for three (as in three times three is nine), so it can match the triune (three, or triangle) god because religion and god have equated to three, it’s the opposing of the gods – this is why we have three Abrahamic faiths: Christianity, Judaism and Islam three major religion also known as people of the book – there is Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva also Osiris, Isis, and Horus.

On the first day of winter, the Sun is at its highest in the northern hemisphere, and the constellation that begins in summer is Leo (the Lion); therefore, when it’s in the Constellation of Leo, summer begins. So on the first day of summer, the Sun is at its highest and also at its hottest – three months later or 90 degrees later (if you have 30 days in a month and three months later, it’s 90 days), the Sun is halfway down we call this the ‘fall’ the Sun falls until it hits December 21st. Now, the Sun is dead because it does not go farther south for three days or back to the northern hemisphere. It just sits there in the same degree (the winter solstice). The Egyptians equated this to God’s son being dead (in his Tomb) for three days. Then, on December 25th, the Sun moves one degree north and is now born again – to start its annual journey to the northern hemisphere. Ninety days later, it is springing back to life, commonly known as spring. Spring’s prominent constellation is Virgo, as in Virgin; God’s Sun was born of a Virgin – ancient Egyptians say when you die, you pass on, as in passing the equator, because we know he would return. Passing the equator is known as Passover (an Egyptian celebration); the Hebrews and Jews celebrate Passover on the first day of spring. Christians do not celebrate Passover, but on the same week as Passover, Christians have something called the resurrection of God’s Son. Both belief systems are based on the astrology of the Sun.          

All three major religions of the Abrahamic faiths, except Islam, can be traced back to India, especially the Jewish religion. Their six-pointed star (the Star of David) originated in India and was also picked up by the Buddhists. It would later become the Star of David in the 1890s. Christianity’s own triune – the Father, Son and Holy Spirit or in Judaism, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob all come together in a triune godhead – and their particular names are titles. Their existence as actual beings is in question. In India, the highest represented priests were called Brahmas (and the letter ‘A’ was put in front of Brahmas to produce Abraham). Islam is slightly different from the Abrahamic faith due to its history, but later, it would become part of the triune with the inception of Mohamed; before Mohamed, they worshipped the planet Saturn at the time, along with the Moon and Venus. The planet Venus is associated with the colour green, which is the primary colour that represents Islam. So, the religion of Judaism, Christianity and Islam had their beginnings in ancient pagan religions.

Fundamentalists view Paganism as the antithesis of Christianity, with its ideas opposite to one another; for example, while Pagans worship many gods, Christians worship only one God. While it’s true, Paganism is the worship of many gods (polytheism). Advocating there is only one true God, which is different from the Gnostic Version of a True God. A Christian’s true God is somewhat similar to that of the God and ruler of this world as described in Gnostic belief. Christian’s version of a true God is an attempt to correlate all belief systems to one God, essentially a sort of quasi-monotheism. The Roman polytheists worshipped the king of the gods Jupiter and his earthly representation in his son Apollo. They also mentioned the mother goddesses, Isis and Venus. Unfortunately, the Roman system of polytheism wasn’t working too well because the Jews saw it as idolatry. So, at this point, the Church revamped its old religion and made it more all-encompassing to fit Christian sensibilities. Christianity is a polytheistic religion masquerading as monotheism (or a Judaism version of Roman polytheism).

From an astro-theological perspective, you have Apollo, the sun god who is the son of Jupiter and was re-branded as Jehovah, and Jesus represented as two gods. The father of Jupiter in this pantheon is Saturn – in Greek, it’s known as Cronus (the god of time and death). We see Cronus in the chronology as always having an hourglass; he is also known as the god of harvest (as harvesting crops, as in the cycle of life and death). So, you have Saturn and Cronus as the father of Jupiter, which incidentally makes Jesus’s grandfather the god of death (the god of time). Confusion of beliefs arises when they confuse the worship of Saturn with Satan when it’s a polytheistic cult (worship of many gods). Christians are confused or deceived into believing they are worshipping the True God when they are worshipping one pantheon of the family. It was never monotheistic; that was just an illusion; the Elites worship all of them. 

Fundamentalist Christians who steer towards conspiracy groups both in the spectrum of the new-fundamentalist and the traditional-fundamentalist who are advocates for an Evangelical program – work as a separatist movement while simultaneously being a recruitment institution to evangelize their ideology. Those ideologies can be many things. One of those is to cut you from your higher reality; platonic idealism is a term for it. It’s basically about praying to their idol, our white Jesus, which history tells us otherwise, but if you don’t do so, you’re a Pagan, Witch, Satanist, Devil-worshipper and so forth. This ideology can align with cultural imperialism, which is about the power to define reality for everyone.   

The same polytheistic cults re-branded this quasi-monotheistic (Christianity) religion 500 years ago as heliocentricism. The sun represents the centre of the solar system as an accepted astronomical model, which is still very much the worship of the sun. The pope is the Sun-god incarnate – that’s what the Vicar of Christ means; he represents the Sun-god – what triples six means. Religion is not the good guy; religious authorities have always been an instrument of power. The Church and State have never been separated. So, when they passed on the Christian religion to heliocentric, the Jesuits made an old religion more acceptable for a scientific age. The pope was represented with the triple six as every Sun god is, as evidenced by the Globe as it tilts 23.4 degrees to the sun, leaving 66.6 in the right angle – that is to show if you’re a heliocentric follower, you’re essentially bowing to Caesar.

.

Michael Keefe.

.

• [Is there a link between the fate of your soul after death and the Sun?] During the Roman era, there were several Mysteries. Solar mysteries were one of them, and they often aligned with power and precedence.

.

• Rome adopted sun worship from outsiders through foreign evangelists. Still, chief among these was the Syrian sun cultists who came to the Eternal City with the so-called Syrian Emperors, who were, in fact, descendants of the Phoenicians with their tremendous and small mysteries (Baalbek, for starters).]

.

.

Esoteric Agenda a Fundamentalist Rhetoric:

.

.

---

.

Spiritualty Sceptic; Spiritualty Rational [Originally posted on 27th September 2015]: Aside from atheists’ annoying detachment from God, Atheists and Christians have one thing in common: both believe, as Allan Watts puts it, that the world is an ‘artefact’ of nature; how the artefact came into being is another matter. In previous essays, I outlined that rationality breeds atheism. However, rationalism and scepticism are not bad things.

There are a lot of born-again Christians out there. Their internal experience with spirituality automatically makes them follow Christ due to their background and environment, which defines their individual beliefs and ideals. There seems to be self-elitism to the born-again Christians; their experience in the supernatural makes them think they are the chosen ones. This viewpoint and a solid Christian upbringing are a recipe for chaos. These types of experiences can occur in near-death experiences or sometimes taking hallucination drugs or by any other event in their lives. There is a slight difference between this experience and the present experience; one of these can be self-elitism over living beyond the ego.

There is a vast difference between spirituality and religion, and many people know this. They have realised that having a firm belief system and regarding it as absolute truth does not make you spiritual, no matter the nature of that belief. And this is the rigidity of Christian thinking; unless you think like them, I’m afraid you might be mistaken in their eyes. With the influx of Eastern teachings separating, religion and spirituality became more apparent, and it is more likely the Church took notice.

There are now intellectuals in Christian history who use Eastern belief systems, cutting and pasting those belief systems and fashioning something that can align with the New Testament. Their approach to recruiting people into their institutions also aligns with their propaganda. For example, let’s say a person who is a Christian has a spiritual awakening; a spiritualist will equate this to the grace of God and reinforce them with their study to come up with some truth. However, Christians will realise it’s the grace of God and Christ and identify it as an opportunity to be a Christian who is born again, and only through Christ will you be saved. See how problematic this approach is, and ultimately, it is fear-laden. Do you need the Bible when you know everything starts from the spirit? Do you need to go through Christ to be with God? You become closer to God after your awakening, and it often doesn’t come with the help of a Messiah.  

Fundamentalist Christians won’t have any of that; they will keep pushing only through Christ is the way, and that before in front of God you will be Judged. And this is an absolute farce; see how fear is the structure in which they preach. The truth is that reaching Enlightenment is reaching Christ’s Consciousness; that means that you will be saved through him. God is love, not fear.

The notion of being saved differs from the gnostic point of view, which is that gnosis is about knowledge of divine reality. [The Gnostics seemed to define the remote God of the Pleroma as ineffable, which means indescribable, indicating that God is beyond the realm of mere things. – Richard Smoley, Jay Kinney]

All sorts of questions can arise when you regulate the notion of being saved to an inverse form of solipsism. An answer that can stand apart from this militant notion [is that gnosis is knowledge of how we stand about the Unknown God and the material universe. For the Gnostics, without knowledge of the Demiurge, the Archons, the bridal chamber, and most importantly, the route back to the Pleroma, we cannot be “saved” but are doomed to wander in illusion both in this life and beyond. As in the Tibetan Buddhist doctrine of the bardos, one must maintain consciousness at one’s death and, armed with the correct passwords, pass through a maze of astral worlds (referred to as “the middle” in The Gospel of Philip) until one reaches the realm of Light. Such an approach to gnosis links it to specific crucial information (perhaps acquired experientially) necessary for salvation. – Richard Smoley, Jay Kinney]

A great example of this inverse-solipsism comes from Kevin M Sullivan, author, minister, and born-again Christian. He described his experience in his early twenties when he went through an event in which he sincerely asked Christ to reveal himself and come into his life. A huge weight was lifted from his chest after the energy of fire came through him and somewhat cleansed him. And from that experience, he knew Christ was real. He would later, through the Bible study, interpret that the fire was Christ’s spirit coming into his spirit, and from this, he was re-born again. In Sullivan’s experience, he embodies the word “I”; therefore, it will be the most significant error and profound truth in his preaching and writings.

So, having this experience and embodying the word “I”, together with the words “me,” “my,” “mine,” and “myself”, is misleading because the word “I”, as Eckhart Tolle describes, “a primordial error, a misperception of which you are, an illusory sense of identity.” So, Kevin M Sullivan would relate the passage in the Bible where the spirit must be born again – Kevin equates his experience with Christ’s Spirit coming into him – to an illusion. He interprets it literally through an experience he had. The passage must be born again can be interpreted in many ways; for example, reaching Christ’s Consciousness can be the same as being born again. He defends this by saying, “I know some people may not like to hear this, but I know it was Christ because I’ve experienced him.” Do you see the word “I” being used repeatedly – his experience, coupled with factual knowledge of the Bible, is misleading, and it doesn’t allow other people to be aware of God; instead, it stifles it. Albert Einstein calls this “an optical illusion of consciousness,” and Eckhart Tolle says, “The illusory self then becomes the basis of misinterpretations of reality, all thought processes, interactions, and relationships. Your reality becomes a reflection of the original illusion.” This is not a dismissal of his experience but of his process and interpretations. (Eckhart Tolle n.d)

He also states that if you’re not born again, if you don’t know him, you’re not ready for eternity – and that there is an evil wave of energy at work to lead people away. Those people who seek to push into the supernatural other than the ways of God, through divination, mediums, and psychics, it’s condemning the scripture – and it is said in the scriptures not to go down that wrought – if you proceed in doing this, it can open up demonic situations. This is a common trait now for fundamentalist Christians to condemn any forms of Esotericism, Gnosticism, Buddhism, and the Tao Te Ching, basically any institution whose only purpose is to make people aware of their consciousness of self. They will box those teachings into the form of an Esoteric Agenda – a conspiracy of which they are a part. This is simultaneously true and conjecture and doesn’t hold to scrutiny. He has self-aggrandised himself into a prophet and weakened the beliefs of his people (Christians) – do every Christian have to go through a near-death to have Christ in them and be born again? Do you see how it’s more about controlling than redemption? The New Age is not helping usher in this New Order movement. Instead, it’s the Church and the New Age; no institution can stand outside the Globalist Elites. What does stand outside is your faith in God, Christ, and your awareness of Consciousness and Spirit.

Divination, mediums, and psychic practice are inherent in spiritual practice. It is said not to practice it according to the texts of the Bible and is solely based on a warning not to do it to keep people away from harm. When channelling or meditating, there is no way of knowing whether or not you are contacting angelic or demonic spirits and why discernment should be practised. First, John 4 1-3 states, “Dear friends, do not believe every spirit but test the spirits to see whether they are from God because many false prophets have gone out into the world. And this is how you can recognise the spirit of God: Every spirit that acknowledges that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God.”

So even Buddha, the supreme enlightened one, was challenged by a demon; the demon Mara demanded to know who would testify that Buddha was worthy of attaining ultimate wisdom. His demon army rose to support him; Buddha said nothing, and then he reached down and touched the earth with his fingers, and the earth shook, and the demons fled. And then Buddha says, “The earth is my witness,” “Mara, you are not the earth, the earth is right here,” accepting the earth as it is. Mara was gone. Then, he meditated through the night, and his former life passed before him; he visually remembered that he had gained the power of birth and rebirth, the cosmic vision of the entire universe. Then, he said my mind was at “peace,” then heaven shook the Bodhi tree and rained down flowers; he had become the awakened one – the “Buddha.” 

This phenomenon becomes more prominent as the number of sensitive people increases. That is demon possession when people are sleeping, and sometimes, even when people are about to sleep but still awake, they get possessed. They’re more commonly known as Incubus and Succubus; some symptoms are a ringing tone in the ear, inability to move, pressure in the chest, your mind being hacked or electrical synopsis firing more and faster than usual, similar or a mind epileptic fit. If possession can occur in sleep or when you’re about to sleep – by the Bible and the Fundamentalist Christian’s logic, we shouldn’t sleep due to voluntary and involuntary divination practices. The brain creates DMT in the brain responsible for dreams; when Incubus and Succubus attack, the person’s dreams are vivid and often feel like they are not in control. Ayahuasca is a plant drug that Sharman uses for spiritual healing on people.

This plant induces DMT and is Holistic—and it’s like (from what I gathered through the interpretations of shamans that it feels like) dreaming while awake. This plant is natural and is part of the whole. Therefore, dreams, holistic healing, and meditation are concepts of the natural and do not exist in the Fundamentalist Christian condemnation; when such events happen to people naturally without their control, their argument is mute.

Satanism and Occultism have their form of magic(k), based on evil worship and sacrifice. So why would a Christian Fundamentalist group in the New Age with this group? I suspect to further their fundamentalist agenda and to keep people in a state of fear, and for that, I have no doubt. Undoubtedly, the extreme political left controls the extreme religious right, which the Fundamentalist Christian Church offsets.

If you’re a musician, there is a concept of improvisation. Musicians know about this when you’re playing a song through an instrument and improvising. Sometimes, you get into a zone, and suddenly, you are not playing the instrument; instead, the instrument is playing you. It’s when you subconsciously know all the notes, and there is little need to think about it, but what is the force driving the song notes to play? Tapping into the ether, this is where artists conjure their imagination and, in doing so, have finer intuition. Schopenhauer says, “The man endowed with imagination is able, as it were, to call up spirits.” Fundamentalist Christians won’t allow this in this act of divine creative nature, or are it an act of divination, so you see, it does not hold up to this primary human faculty of intuition and imagination. And this is why Alan Watt’s comment holds weight when he says: “We don’t need the Bible when we know we have spirit.”

The Tao teachings emphasize awareness of the Tao; the Tao Te Ching came before the Buddha, and their primary education is awareness of the Tao in themselves and the natural world. Sitting and watching the tree’s sway, seeing an aspect of nature in small animals like ants, this is, in a sense, a low meditative state. Sitting down with cross legs is just a detail of how Yoga, Zen and Sage teachers sit. Being aware of breathing is also meditative. So, do you see how nature is part of a creative artefact and that Church teachers dismiss nature and also dismiss your nature and spirit, even though they are agents of the spiritual Church?

Eckhart Tolle says, “What is spiritual realization? The belief that you are spirit, “no,” that’s a thought. It is a little closer to the truth than believing you are who your birth certificate says you are, but it is still a thought. Spiritual realization is to see that what I perceive, experience, think, or feel is ultimately not who I am and that I cannot find myself in all those things that continuously pass away. The Buddha was probably the first human being to see this clearly, so Anata (no self) became one of the central points of his teaching. When Jesus said, “deny thyself,” he meant to neglect (and thus undo) the illusion of self. “I” the self-ego is who I was, and it would be absurd to “deny” it.” (Eckhart Tolle n.d)

Kevin M Sullivan proclaims that while being a minister, he also banishes evil spirits that possess people. He also knows all the different types of spirits out there. One of those he mentions in his Darkness radio interview is Familiar Spirits – familiar spirits act like angels of light to deceive when they are demon spirits. It is said not to practice such divination, and yet he does himself, and he has not accepted that maybe the fire spirit that came into him might be angelic, not Christ. All the archetypes of Christ appearing in people come in as light; he appears in front of them, and people seem profoundly moved by it, and they start to cry. Everybody cries when they see Christ. Grant Morrison, a comic book writer, went through a near-death, and when he saw Christ, Christ said to him, “I’m not the God of your father; I’m the hidden stone that breaks all men’s hearts.” Jesus came to him in Gnostic form.

Aside from Buddha or anyone who goes through similar spiritual practice, awakening is an act of grace. Once you have a presence, Eckhart Tolle says, “You can either try to go on as if nothing has happened, or you can see its significance and recognize the arising of awareness as the most important thing that can happen to you. Opening yourself to the emerging Consciousness and bringing its light into this world becomes your life’s primary purpose.” “I want to know the mind of God. Einstein said, ‘The rest are details.’ ‘What is the mind of God?’ it’s Consciousness.” (Eckhart Tolle n.d)

.

Esoteric Agenda a Fundamentalist Rhetoric:

.

.

---

.

Mystery Religion [Originally posted on 27th September 2015]: I was once asked a question, “Do you believe in Christ?” and I replied, “Yes,” but I don’t believe in the Catholic Church. His face appeared perplexed. He looked confused about my approach, and a question would probably instil him. How can anyone believe in Christ and not the Church? If one examines the propensity for truth in themselves, a thought might formulate in the mind that questions the current notion of the Church Institution. That it’s more corporate than anything else we might associate it with. Would Christ himself be an advocate of a corrupt institution? Any religious historian knows the story from the King James Bible, “and Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the money-changers, and the seats of them that sold doves.” The Catholic Church amasses billions of dollars, hoarding and not giving, the corrupt Priests and systematic abuse are so rampant it’s become inherent. At the same time, the Church goes out of its way to protect this behaviour. The Vatican only holds a hidden history and knowledge library for the initiated secret group. This knowledge is so profound that it could fix most of the problems that concern the world today. This is not a manifesto to conspire against all Church institutions; it is just outlining its overt fallacy. 

To understand why this is happening, you must first go beyond your programmed understanding and instead dive into esotericism and occult knowledge and an understanding of the Mystery Cults. ß In the early settlements of America, Europeans called this country the New World but secretly called it the New Atlantis. This country was a formation of a plan backed by the Royals (Windsor), and this country, on the surface, was going to be a democratic liberal Country with biblical principles. Its true intention, however, is an advantageous social engineering plan – formed by a principle of the ideal man in the perfect utopia. These brave devout pilgrims were known as Puritans (or “Separatists,” as they called themselves) and were little more than indentured servants to European corporate interests. That took place in a corporate colony – not a religious commune. Any so-called religious venture lurks behind a rich and powerful […] pulling the strings from the get-go. These ideas stem back to the Mystery Cults. 

What were the Mystery Schools? (Just small disclaimers do not take the information on the beginnings of Thoth Hermes as fact but as historical myth) Mystery Cult teachings are a pearl of esoteric spiritual wisdom and philosophy passed down by the initiates through generations. These mystery teachings were formed in the age of Atlantis, where they learned all things consciousness. An Atlantis Priest named Thoth went to Egypt, and through him and two Nacals helped introduce the first Pharaoh, Akhenaten; this Pharaoh was 15-foot-tall and had an elongated skull. He abolished all previous beliefs of God, instilled a one God belief, and used the sun-disk symbol to worship. Akhenaten then developed a new Mystery group, and after a while, the people revoked them and had him killed. During the end of the Egypt Empire, Thoth outlined in the emerald tablets that he met a man from Greece named Pythagoras, to which he taught sacred geometry. Thoth lived in Greece as Hermes Trismegistus. To understand Atlantis times, you must also understand dimensions, frequencies, vibrational grids, vortexes, alchemy, Fallen Angels and sacred geometry (etc.), which all stem from the Mystery Religion, and the average lifespan of an Atlantis being was 900 years.

Throughout the centuries, occult knowledge became prevalent. Then forgotten with the rise of materialism and kept secret through secret societies. Their intentions were innocent at the time; they just had more knowledge than the average person – knowledge stemming back to the Mystery Religion [Cults]. It is believed that the Church infiltrated these societies and then became a steward for that group. They intended to guard that knowledge and prevent it from leaking out. But instead, they demonised the original cult groups and those that would follow them. They have kept the name, but their true intentions are gone, replaced by a new Order (or Empire) to further push their agenda, NWO (Globalism), which is in place today.

Grace Knoche of the Theosophical Society outline in her document titled the ‘Mystery Schools,’ describing the origin and I quote: “Millions upon millions of years ago in the darkness of prehistory, humanity was an infant, a child of Mother Nature, un-awakened, dreamlike, and wrapped in the cloak of mental somnolence. Recognition of egoity slept; instinctual consciousness alone was active. Like a stream of brilliance across the horizon of time, divine beings Manasaputras, sons of mind, descended among the sleeping humans and, with the flame of intellectual solar fire, lighted the wick of latent mind, and lo! The thinker stirred. Self-consciousness wakened, and man became a dynamo of intellectual and emotional power: capable of love, hate, glory, or defeat. Having knowledge, he acquired power; acquiring power, he chose; choosing, he fashioned the fabric of his future; and the perception of this ran like wine through his veins.” (Grace Knoche, n.d)

Grace later explains the Atlantis connection, she says; “time marched on, and the race waxed lusty in power, as Lemuria gave birth to Atlantis, the third root-race to the fourth, the fiercest battle was waged: the war between the lords of light and truth and the lords of darkness and ignorance…Thus were established, some threatening to destroy themselves through spiritual iniquity, the first Mystery Schools. From these early centres sprang other Mystery Schools in all parts of the Atlantean world. By the time the Atlanteans were in their heyday of material splendour, these schools were working their hardest to stem the increasing tide of sorcery.” (Grace Knoche, n.d)

The basis of the Mystery School is predicated on the doctrine that creative knowledge and intellect were given to man, so man could achieve Godhood and become a divine being of who he was supposed to be. The doctrine is one of the same for the established elites – the exclusive knowledge to achieve immortality and become Gods without the help of the creator God – all while denying any accountability of sins in trying to achieve this goal. All this can be stretched back to Adam and Eve, when Satan said to Eve, “Ye shall not surely die: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as Gods, knowing good and evil.” (Satan to Eve, Genesis 3:4-5,). Satan knew that by eating the fruit of life, humankind was subject to death, the line “ye shall not surely die” a lie hidden in words. 

While a collective parallel agenda exists that can match biblical references in Genesis, it’s still a baseless assumption to believe that the New Age is subjected to the same representation. The notion that believing in reincarnation and spiritual evolution is another form of the apple, which I don’t believe. While Buddhists convey that reincarnation is something you must get out of the perpetual cycle, but implying that it’s another form of the apple when it’s just a mere parallel; by its logic, everything after the apple is a sin. It’s a conflict raised by fundamentalism that has some esoteric knowledge. This kind of thinking only reinforces a false Esoteric Agenda; there is splitting and combing history with beliefs. The New Age is relatively new and amorphic. Still, before the New Age label, it was known to be various groups that knew occult and esoteric knowledge in its early days, it was free from the established elite, but once infiltrated started to become more agenda driven. Hence this propensity for an Esoteric Agenda component that the conspiracy Christians loves to advocate – however, mutual exclusivity exists. Discerning truth and fiction should be exercised; this was true for early occultists as well.

Far Right Religion: So here we have Christianity, which works through politics; Christianity is an offset of Egyptian Beliefs; with the understanding of the Mystery Cult teachings, they took over the occult groups, now called Mystery Religions. The Vatican has a vast knowledge of the ancient text, which is not part of Italy and is controlled by the Jesuits. The Catholic Church is responsible for the New-Testament writings, changing explicit Genesis writing while not entirely dismissing the book of Enoch.

There is a contention where the Christian right is trying to convey that the new age is part of the New Order to be one of the same. A certain aspect of this is true; since the founder of Esalen died and the re-interrogation of the Rockefellers as new management to the Esalen Institute – paved the way for the New Age to rise only to become an agenda-driven institute. However, that’s not to say purists or followers of the old New Age can’t exist. And this gives the Christian’s notion as being one of the same as the New Order to be purely based on conjecture – because it would mean discerning many books. Since the Dead Sea Scrolls and Gnostic texts appeared, Christians have not afforded the same contention within themselves. So the spiritualist has to fight two fronts to manoeuvre around, the Christian right and the rational Atheist. The spiritualist has to explain why both are part of a deliberate dialectal polarity set in place for them to waste their time on. The spiritualist is in a way are the new Philosopher and stands outside of these two polarizing beliefs, and here is why?

Christian Right and Atheist institutions have offset followers, such as Christian Science, Agnostics and Humanist. They all have a common ideology, a lack of faith or blatant denial of God. While also having myopia to anyone wanting to reach enlightenment, be awakened, or reach Christ-consciousness, the Christian right will say “Christ” is the son of God, but no one else, just him. The New Age describes reaching Christ-consciousness as the same as reaching enlightenment or being aware or reaching Satori, while the Atheists disbelieve God outright until explained by science. The Christian right has moral ground to reduce the New Age group because it has no wall to stop any merging infiltration, so this gives the Christian right a way to box the New age from being corrupted. And this is dangerous; it gives them a judge-like complex. So, you have an infiltrated Christian right, reducing the New Age to a conspiracy with which the Christian right is also associated. It’s a form of deflection while suggesting their truth is absolute.

Eckhart Tolle, in his book ‘A New Earth,’ in the sub-section ‘Truth: Relative or Absolute,’ subheading ‘I am right you are wrong: outlines that it’s dangerous in personal relationships as well as in interactions between nations, tribes, religions and so on. The history of Christianity is, of course, a prime example of how the belief that you are in sole possession of the truth that is to say, right, can corrupt your actions and behaviour to the point of insanity. For centuries, torturing and burning people alive if their opinion diverged even in the slightest from the Church doctrine or narrow interpretations of the scripture (Truth) was considered right because the victims were “wrong” They were so wrong that they needed to be killed. The truth was considered more important than human life. And what was the truth? A story you had to believe in, which means a bundle of thoughts. (Eckhart Tolle, n.d)

Eckhart describes The Catholic and the churches as correct in identifying relativism that there is no absolute truth to guide human behaviour, one of our time’s evils. Then, stating that “it won’t be found if you look for it in doctrines, ideologies, sets of rules, or stories, and all this is common to the notion of thought.” He says: “Thought can be at best point to the truth, but it is never the truth.” Buddhists say: “The finger pointing to the moon is not the moon.” He then interprets this through the ego; he explains that you can use them in the service of the ego, or you can use them in the service of Truth. If you believe only your religion is the Truth, you are using it in the service of the ego, in such a way; that religion becomes ideology and creates an illusory sense of superiority as well as division and conflict between people. In the service of the Truth, religious teachings represent signposts or maps left behind by awakened humans to assist you in spiritual awakening, that is to say, in becoming free of identification with form. (Eckhart Tolle, n.d)

Eckhart further describes truth inwardly; he outlines: that the truth is inseparable from who you are – yes, you are the truth. If you look for it elsewhere, you will be deceived every time. The very being that you are is truth. Jesus tried to convey that when he said, “I am the way and the truth and the life.” These words uttered by Jesus are one the most powerful and direct pointers to the truth. If understood correctly, if misinterpreted, it can become a great obstacle. (Eckhart Tolle, n.d)

Kierkegaard, a polar opposite of Marxist thinking at the time, is a philosopher who explores Christianity subjectively. He is an existentialist and a kind of early Humanist. He, however, had no interest in external institutions like progress or consumer society, and that individualism was stifled. He says his views on religious belief: “What is this self of mine, it is the most abstract of all things, and yet at the same time, it’s the most concrete. Its freedom, the consciousness of being an individual, which is fundamental in man, is his consciousness of eternity. Christianity is not a doctrine; it is an existence communication, it can only be expounded, when being realized in Men’s Lives.” He later expands a more definitive verse; he says, “My task is so new that in Christianity’s 1800 years, there is literally not one from whom I can learn, on how it should be done? For all extraordinary men who hitherto live have aimed at spreading Christianity, my task is to put a Halt to the lying diffusion of Christianity to help shake off a massive number of nominal Christians. The worst danger for Christianity is not Hersey, heterodoxies, not free thinkers, nor pro-vein wordiness. Still, it’s the kind of orthodoxies, which is hearty twaddle, mediocrity with a dash of sugar, in every way that has come to this that what we all came to know as Christianity, is precisely what Christ came to Abolish.” (Kierkegaard n.d)

And this is no more apparent in contemporary America, especially in the Bible belt area, where they’re entrenched in this cul-de-sac that borders in cult-like status. Upon this, you will have people like Steve Quale (a fundamentalist Christian) preaching New Age ideologies (but more precisely historical myth) that he adopted from the Mystery School teachings, then using that as a vehicle of fear to reinforce an Evangelical following. He makes people aware of this and then brainwashes them by saying that teaching the gospel is the only way. Unknowledgeable Christians fall prey to this, while the New Age only advocates enlightenment within; Quale and his group of followers will use it as means of control through fear.

Alan Watt’s lecture on ‘Jesus and his religion’ outlines that Jesus was a human being like Buddha, Shera Krishna, Rana Hamachi and so forth. Who in their life had a colossal experience of cosmic consciousness, and that this can happen to anyone it’s like falling in love. And that you don’t have to be part of any religion to experience it; he says: “when it hits you, you know it; sometimes it comes from long practice of meditation and spiritual discipline. Sometimes it comes for no reason you can determine; we say it’s the grace of God. That there comes this overwhelming conviction that you have mistaken your identity, that what I thought was me was completely superficial, and I am an expression of X (God), the name that cannot be named, and the Taboo name amongst the Hebrews. There is no longer the separate you; it’s only this happening. And if you have the name in the background, this happening is God, or the will of God, or the Doing of God, or if you don’t have that word in your background – you will say it’s the flowing of the Tao, or it’s the Maya of Brahman, Maya meaning the creative illusion, the play.” This experience can make people feel genuine amongst others and be inspired to see the divine in people’s eyes. (Alan Watts, n.d)

Alan Watts further elaborates that Jesus’sJesus’s Cosmic Experience was not a product of omniscience; Saint Paul makes this clear that Jesus renounced his divine powers to be man, he says: “Let this mind be a new, which was also in Christ Jesus, who being in the form of God, though not equality with God a thing to be hung to, but humbled himself, and made himself of no reputation and was fashioned as a man and became obedient to death.” Theologians call this Kenosis, self-emptying, so an omniscience man or omnipotent would not be a man, so an orthodox doctrine of the nature of Christ, that he was both true God and true man, you must say for true God to be united with a true man. True God has to make a voluntary renunciation of omniscience, omnipotence, and omnipresence. So, therefore, if Jesus was to come out and say, I am the son of God, that’s like saying I am the boss’s son, or I am the boss. 

Everyone will view this as blasphemy or subversion; it’s like trying to introduce democracy into the kingdom of heaven; no man has seen God. In Jesus’s esoteric teachings recorded in the synoptic Gospel, he made it clear that he didn’t come right out there and say he was the son of God. Instead, he identified himself with the messiah described in the second part of the prophet Isaiah. “The suffering serpent who was despised and rejected of men,” and this man is the non-political messiah; it was convenient to make that identification even though it would get him into trouble. However, to his elect disciple, as recorded in Saint John, he said, “before Abraham was, I am, I am the way the Truth and the Life. I am the resurrection of Life, I am the living bread that comes down from heaven, I am the father are one, and he who has seen me has seen the father.” Upon the Jews found out, they put him to death for blasphemy. (Alan Watts, n.d)

And this is because it happens to any mystic who’ve had this experience; it happened to a Sufi Mystic in Persia. With this in mind, Christ was pedestalized, so his troublesome experience with cosmic consciousness would not come and cause a nuisance. Others, who had this experience and expressed it at a time when the Church had power, were persecuted. If you pedestalized Jesus, you strangle the Gospel at birth, and it’s been the tradition in the Catholic Church and Protestant to pass off an emasculated Gospel. Gospel means good news; what is the good news about Gospel ordinarily handed down? “Because here is the revelation of God in Christ Jesus, and we were supposed to follow his life and example, without the unique advantage of being the boss’s son. Now both traditions of catholic and Protestant Churches represent Jesus to us as a freak. Born of a virgin, knowing he is the son of God, having the power of miracles, and knowing it’s impossible to kill him, he will rise again. And so we were asked to take up the cross and follow him – when we don’t know that about ourselves. So, what happened is this, we are delivered by an impossible Gospel.” However, upon this, Christianity institutionalized guilt. (Alan Watts, n.d)

This is the Christianity of most people; now, there is a subtler form of Christianity with the Theologians, the Mystics and the Philosophers. However, this is not what gets preached, “What would the real Gospel be”? The real good news is not simply that Jesus of Nazareth was the son of God, but that he was a powerful son of God who came to open everybody’s eyes – to that fact that you are too. This was said in the 10th chapter of Saint James, verse 30, he said, “I am the father are one; many good works I have shown you from the father. And from which of these do you stone me,” and they said; “for good work we stone you not, but for Blasphemy for being man, make yourself God.” And he replied; “isn’t written in your law, I have said you are Gods, if god called to whom he gave his word, you can’t deny scripture, how can you say I Blaspheme? Because I said I am the son of God.” This isn’t peculiar to Jesus when he says; ‘I am the way, and no man comes to the father,’ but by me, this, I am, this me, is the divine in us. Which in Hebrew is called the Roich Adeni [possibly wring spelling]; this is best outlined in the Esoteric Jews, the Cabalist and the Hasidic. The Roich is the breath which God breathed into the nostril of Adam, which is different from the soul. The Roich (psyche) is the divine in the creature by virtue of which sons of are, or the nature of God, manifestations of the divine. This discovery is the Gospel; that’s the good news, but it has been repressed throughout history in western religion because all western religion has taken the form of celestial monarchies – and, therefore, discouraged democracy in the kingdom of heaven. (Alan Watts, n.d)

Until the teachings of the German mystics in the 15th century – a movement began, such as the Anabaptists, The Brothers of The Free Spirit, Levellers, and the Quakers. This spiritual movement came to this country and found a Republic. It is from the white racist Christians that we have the threat of fascism because they have a Militant religion. And this is not the religion of Jesus, which was the realization of divine son-ship, but the religion about Jesus, which pedestalized him and said only this man, is the divine, and you have better recognize it. Upon this realization, they proclaim themselves as the Church militant, onward Christian soldiers march us to war, utterly exclusive, convinced in advance that examining the doctrines of any other religion is the top religion. Not realizing what it teaches would be far more credible if it were truly Catholic, that is to say, re-stated the truth that has been known from time immemorial. Every religion should be self-critical. Otherwise, it will degenerate into self-righteous hypocrisy, and then we can see this that Jesus speaks not from the situation of a historical Deus Machina, of a weird and extraordinary event, but he is a voice that joins with other voices that have said in every place and time, “wake up man, wake up.” (Alan Watts, n.d)

To conclude: You only have to go to YouTube, and you will see the number of videos depicting the number of Christians still thinking this way; instead of Christian soldiers marching us to war, as Alan watts said, it’s Christian video propaganda spreading backwards ideals, for instance, the demonization of yoga, Zen, meditation practices, that’s just one of many other facets that they will drive to people.

.

• This Blog was really a reaction to bourgeoning New-Fundamentalist; comments on YouTube seem inefficient to get one’s point of view or analysis.

.

Rationality Breeds Atheism (03)

.

.

---

.

Part Three:  A Post-New-Atheism World and the Dangers of the New-Fundamentalist Christian [Originally posted on 19th December 2017]: The extreme religious right that stems from the Evangelical Southern Baptist Christian groups has the literal viewpoint of what Satan is and that he is responsible for everything wrong in the world. In Gnosticism, one speaks of the Demiurge (the architect of creation, a god, but not the True God), also known as the evil mind, aka Jehovah. Some have concluded that Satan can also represent the Demiurge. I can go along with both of these representations. However, not so much as to impose ‘Lucifer’ as ‘Satan’ because there is a clear distinction.

The person of Jesus alone revealed the truth of God; from their perspective, ancient cosmology brought forth its full context. The distinction between the creator and creation was made clear, and the futility of those first fallen angels was plain to see. Therefore, Satan had to reinvent the narrative and repackage himself and his message to convince the people of his worship as a supreme being. Satan for fundamentalists is ‘Lucifer’. Even though no historical text can prove this, there is a separation (but it’s for another subject). 

This narrative or this new perspective he would implement is not relatively new in history. The passing down of hidden knowledge would result in using our pride and arrogance to propel it further. The passing down of occult knowledge (although fundamentalist likes to use the word gnosis as well – In a clever way to re-imagine Gnosticism as something nefarious that aligns with the occult. Which is a non-gnosis or anti-gnosis interpretation from a fundamentalist hiding as an anti-gnostic-fundamentalist-Christian; true gnosis requires something else entirely). This forbidden knowledge was re-branded as science, and much of the groundwork was already in place from the philosophers of Greece. Eventually, it would become sanctified and harmonious with the teaching of the Bible; this harmony would go on towards renascence.           

Their influence started to carry weight amongst theologians and scholars throughout most of the predominant European Christian Countries. Primarily, works from Hermes Trismegistus were translated from Latin and circulated among the intellectuals. Kabala and Alchemy also got attention; the three doctrines formed the basis of the materialistic concept of what we know as ‘science.’ So, science’s origin story comes from pioneers greatly influenced by occult manuscripts as the core tenant of mysticism from the likes of Newton, Copernicus, Bruno, etc. However, in saying this, it’s still a reductionist view. It attempts to simplify those pioneers as mere re-packagers of ancient knowledge. What is missing is that they also brought something new, something of their own, to the material concept that doesn’t inherently tie in with their absolute cosmological viewpoint.    

Quantum physics, as we know it today, began with atomism, and atomism has a similar aspect of breaking things down to particle theory. Atomism soon became Quantum theory; this gave way to nuclear physics centred on central Europe. So, there must be a question about where the predominant physicists came from then. Niels Bore, Zillard, Albert Einstein, Oppenheimer Bros, and Edward Teller come from Central Eastern Europe. In this geographical area, the oral tradition of Kabala was most robust in Europe. Therefore, it’s safe to assume that there was an apparent attempt to make quantum physics fit with Kabala.    

Theoretical Physicist Michio Kaku states: “I’m a theoretical Physicist, and I like to say I walk in the footsteps of giants like Albert Einstein and Niels Bore. I’m not a philosopher; however, I’m rather dazzled by the fact that many of the basic mysteries we find in string theory and the theory of everything seemed to be mirrored in the Zohar and the Kabbala.” This awareness is not singular to Kaku but among the rest of the scientific Physicists community. They’re concerned about the New Age ceasing upon these discoveries as the confirmation of occult knowledge during the Renaissance – which would suggest that they were right about such a notion written in Kabala and other ancient forms of Hermeticism. 

Two aspects of the scientific community have two agendas that combine, like a fork in the road joining to one main road. One aspect of science is the propaganda aspect that employs non-scientists (or actors) as scientists (or Scientism agents) to set up many iconographic front-men as a direct answer (but this wasn’t always the case decades ago) to the ever-growing Flat Earth movement questions. They also align themselves with an Atheistic ideology to instil in the masses a hyperreal notion of space being absolute when it’s an illusion. What is absolute are particles that most physicists would agree upon, although most also believe in the hyperreal-space notion. The other aspect of this plan is the uncertainty part that correlates with the observer aspect (I say uncertainty because particles can’t be measured, but waves left by particles can). This led to a simulated theory aspect; there is still a discovery process. For the most part, a simulation, holographic or infinite parallel dimensions paradigm is almost certain at this point; too much evidence is piling up to say otherwise. Is there a plan for this part, common logic would suggest they would hide this, but they are letting everybody know – which suggests something else is at work. So, one aspect of science propagates with an atheistic viewpoint, and the other advocates a simulacrum, which leads to a creator (or an intelligent designer); how can both exist under the same banner as science? I guess one is a business model with a nihilism concept, and the other is a business model with varying degrees of truth.

The new-Atheist movement is declining much in the same way as Globalism; in the title of John Ralston Saul’s book The ‘Collapse of Globalism’ One little aspect of Ralston’s book through his synopsis States: “That ideologies come and go, God, Kings, Dictators and so forth – we went through a period of 30 to 40 years where for the first time in history economics has been promoted from 3 to 4 in the rank of importance to number one. It’s the most important thing, and everything is seen through economics – civilisations are being dragged or structured through the lens of economics. The loss of humanism and the citizen as a source of legitimacy has now taken a back seat to economics, becoming the new source for legitimacy.” Therefore, the hyperreal-space notion is declining in people’s worldviews. And that’s because economics forms legitimacy, but you won’t find NASA losing its grant money in the billions soon; if it did, it would affect the other science departments that play on simulation ideas. So, there is a morphing of mutual exclusivity between the sciences because they’re economically bound and funded.     

The anti-gnostic-conspiracy-Christian-fundamentalist would speculate what is at work – they have concluded that Quantum theory is just a repackaged occult worldview. This magical worldview has been made to look refined, polished and empirical but has been guided all along – That all stems from Babylonian mysticism. Atomism is an occult teaching birthed by demons intrinsic to Pantheism (Monotheism), which was re-booted by alchemy and hermeticism and gave way to the scientific revolution. At the core of occultism (or divination), the practitioners do not believe he is being fooled by demons, regardless of what method of practice they use, Tarot Cards, Wigi Boards, Sigils, and so forth. Speculating that it would result in a physical manifestation by spiritual beings, they could also manipulate particles themselves. Therefore, the demonic realm could manipulate those results, which are suggestive, meaning that double slit experiments had been manipulated – to further technology regarding Cern and other Colliders to perpetuate the coming of the literal anti-Christ ‘Satan.’        

‘You just have to shake your head and laugh’ not at the concept because I’m a conspiracy buff. But at the audacity to portray subjects that lean towards esoteric or occult knowledge. To something that can be summed up or simplified in the fundamentalist propaganda model – sprinkled with a veneer of the aethereal when they induce theological speculation. The kind of stuff they can come up with, it’s clear they love to reduce, simplify, slander, exclude their Christian history and re-interpret anything that can match their fundamentalist viewpoint. I’ve noticed that they become good at indexing occultism and esotericism, which is, ironically, a good starting point. Still, they do not give it or elaborate on what meaningful insights those teachings can bring. You have to look at those subjects deeply before making any conclusion. They suggest that science came from Kabala and Hermeticism, which is true, and those esoteric teachings started in the Babylonian Mystery Cults; however, so did Christianity. The Bible was birthed in the Babylonian Mystery Schools (or Cults). Science could be the result of the evolution of Kabala and Hermeticism because science is its machine. Much like how Christianity was formed that resulted in numerous denominations.                

You have to realize, much like the ‘D/Tao’that [Christianity is a way, even Jesus’s earliest followers were known as ‘the way’ even before “Christian” was coined (Acts 9:2, 11:26). A way implies direction, here the direction of the seeker as he or she moves toward God. Everything changes when one embarks upon “the way.” Having decided to move toward God, one finds that certain forces help while others oppose. Hence, Christianity tends to view the opposition in much the same fashion; the Hebrew word Satan, from which the devil’s proper name is derived, means “opponent.” The devil is the sum of the cosmic forces opposing the journey toward God – viewed as a conscious person. Individual thoughts and desires that oppose our way are known as ‘demons’ or ‘evil spirits’’ esoterically, these are the “enemies” mentioned by the Psalmists. While Christianity is not the first of the world religions to view evil in this light (that honour probably goes to Zoroastrianism), it is the one that has emphasised it the most. The struggle with the devil can be viewed as wrestling with everything that moves us away from God. – Richard Smoley, Jay Kinney   

It’s pretty straightforward that the anti-gnostic-conspiracy-Christian-fundamentalist is embarking on digital-evangelical-missionary work to show the way. Still, it’s not the true way because it employs a sort of militant intellectual point of view. Being digital, it has a habit of being amorphic and, therefore, changes it enough to convey its fundamentalist-intellectual-militancy. It’s not because Christianity is under attack or scrutiny. It’s because there is a troublesome aspect in embracing or calling oneself a Christian when you know that doing so results in all sorts of theological baggage,  particularly that of Christian assumptions and morality only reinforced by decades of politicised fundamentalism.   

The new-Atheist groups from Dawkins and Harris are starting to lose their hold on their not-so-demoralised followers now that something new has challenged them (the Flat Earth movement). It’s a given that Christians will always challenge them; it’s inevitable perpetual conflict, but that something new is not entirely new, but a rediscovery of absolute truth; absolute in the sense that what goes up must come down, or the ground in which we stand is transfixed or still. Was this new-Atheist movement a sort of resistance to the counter-reformation against irrationality seeping into the managerial class (the betas to the elite)? They came about because of them; it was cleverly collaborated and executed, using tactics like (puritan) shaming. 

Dawkins himself admitted in an interview with Ben Stein that nobody knows how the universe started and that we can only postulate that sort of event that might have been for the origin of life. It would have to be a self-replicating molecule when prompted with a question about the possibility of intelligent design. He stated, “In some early time somewhere in the universe, a civilisation evolved probably in some Darwinian means to a very high level of technology, and designed the form of life they seeded onto this planet. That is an intriguing possibility, and I suppose you can find evidence in the details of biochemistry/molecular biology that you might find a signature of some designer – and that designer could be a higher intelligence. That higher intelligence itself had to come about by an explicable process, and it couldn’t just jump into existence spontaneously, that’s the point.” Stein summarises that Dawkins is not against intelligent design, just certain types of designers like God. 

There is a subtle reverberation with Dawkins’s statement between people and not a positive one that they unknowingly listen to a type of science fiction (or a myth) disguised as probable theories. I recall William Shatner stating that science fiction and science are the same. For a gnostic, this can ring true. And this is what Dawkins has done more subtly. There is a hint of Ancient Astronaut Theology of a literal Alien God, and not the one described in Gnosticism, for the True God, is often described as an Alien God, but something more literal, more Archon-like. [The Gnostic creation myths portrayed the creator of this world as an imperfect lesser god, known as the Demiurge or Yaltabaoth, who was the accidental result of an attempt by Sophia (Wisdom) – a feminine facet of the true God – to experience the act of creation of her own. According to some versions of the myth, Yaltabaoth, in turn, created still lesser planetary rulers called Archons, and the world itself, including Man. – Richard Smoley, Jay Kinney]

The only difference is that Gnostics believe in a True God, and Dawkins does not; he cleverly adopted ancient alien theology for his own God Delusion propaganda. It’s because it can match a hyperreal-space notion. Furthermore, he adopted Erich Von Daniken’s concept of ‘Cargo Cults’ for his book ‘The God Delusion of how advanced technology exposure can affect tribal cultures and hints that Christianity began the same way as the cargo cults. He states, “The entire history of some of these cults, from initiation to expiry, is wrapped up within living memory. Unlike the cult of Jesus, whose origins are not reliably attested, we can see the whole course of events before our eyes (and even here, as we shall see, some details are now lost). It is fascinating to guess that the cult of Christianity almost certainly began in the same way and spread at the same high speed.”

He would describe how those cultures would have felt; he says, “It seems that in every case, the islanders were bowled over by the wondrous possessions of the white immigrants to their islands, including administrators, soldiers and missionaries. They were perhaps the victims of (Arthur C.) Clarke’s Third Law, which I quoted in Chapter 2: ‘Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.'” What exactly is he trying to infer? – That Jesus was an Alien and that followers of Jesus became cults because he seemed magically/technologically superior. Or was he trying to infer by those two quotes that the god-man Jesus “began the same way” as the cargo cults, softened by liking it to a famous ancient astronaut narrative by Arthur C. Clarke? And this is akin to a kind of heresy; the fundamentalist Christians will surely think so, but also mainstream Christians. 

Atheism could be the effect of a dominant church history spanning two millennia; what if that history wasn’t so rigid or didn’t happen? You will find that spiritual experience is the driving force that propelled many of the earliest believers. And among the followers of this new religion, there were many approaches. One of those approaches came from the Gnostics, and the same sense of alienation among modern followers of the spirit came with it. This is where the distinction arises – to dispel or question the notion of a cargo-cult theology that is inherently material with a pinch of sci-fi. This is because both the cargo-Cult and a Panspermia theory require a container that is space, which does not exist but only exists as a hyperreal-space notion. A theory of dimensional barriers beyond the firmament is a theory that has more merit than a space notion. A localised universe doesn’t necessarily negate the existence of what we know to be Aliens or Archons that were manifested by the Demiurge – who could have had a hand in our evolution as Human Beings.   

.

Rationality Breeds Atheism (02):

.

.

---

.

Part two: Atheism, a Collective Push to Detach You from Yourself. [Originally posted on 30th September 2015]: Atheism is a collective push to detach you from yourself, your universe, and your notion of God. On occasion, intellectuals have made a strong denouncement of God. In their interviews, the word God comes up as a misrepresentation of what God may be. Atheists who bind themselves with science are portrayed as a group of intelligent people. However, they cannot differentiate between the mystery of the universe, actual events and dogmas. They become dogmatic in themselves and, at the same time, convince the people who follow them to be dogmatic as well.

For some, God could be the unknowable ‘D/Tao’, a word deriving from the ‘Tao Te Ching,’ meaning “the way.” It’s challenging to assume that this group is part of the plan to collectively promote this way of thinking (the nihilist or material way of thinking) or if it is just a bunch of individuals, through no fault of their own, collectively believing that there is no god.

Lord Martin Rees says: “Science of any kind that teaches us is that even the simplest things are hard to understand, the Hydrogen Atom for instance, and that makes me rather suspicious of anyone who claims to have a quick and easy answer, to any deep aspect of reality, I think the most we can hope for is an incomplete and metaphorical understanding, and therefore I’m not myself someone who can accept any specific religious dogmas.” In the simplest term, he says we have no complete understanding of science and therefore any understanding of the Universe, and god must also be incomplete, he says “quick and easy answer, to any deep aspect of reality.”  

Anyone who’s had an enlightenment experience will tell you, “Oh! That’s all it is, how I can be so blind. It’s been with me all this time; it’s easy and simple.” Being enlightened is not for the chosen; it’s merely arbitrary. Allan Watts describes it as catching a cold, it comes, then it goes – and it feels like a universal harmonizing feeling, but it’s a cold you don’t want to lose. Some people seek holistic drugs, Zen, and yoga meditation, but for others, it comes out of the blue. Lord Martin Rees has indirectly told the truth by saying the best we can hope for is an incomplete and metaphorical understanding, so by being aware of experience, the truth is complete. The symbolic interpretation is perhaps better understood through referencing rational calculation and the meta-physics with body and spirit. 

Refrain from being swayed by technical jargon and vocabulary; they can often serve as a means of trickery, a sleight of hand. Many conventional thinkers dismiss metaphysics as pseudoscience, even when undeniable evidence supports it within the framework of traditional science. These thinkers manipulate the truth and context by changing definitions and suggestions. I’m not advocating for pseudo-mysticism; I’m simply reporting what already exists in discourse. However, it’s worth noting that atheists often aim to demystify the supernatural. Even their concept of the Big Bang theory is inherently supernatural—after all, the idea of something coming from nothing is, by definition, magical.

Sam Harris discusses  neuroscience, says: “Everything about your mind can be damaged; by damaging the brain, you can cease to recognise faces, cease to know the name of animals, but still name tools, the fragmentation in which our mind is parcellated, the level of the brain, is not at all intuitive, and there is a lot to know about it, what we’re being asked to consider is that if you damage one part of the brain, subjectivity is lost, damage another more is lost, and yet you damage the whole thing at death, we can rise of the brain with our faculties intact recognizing grandma and speaking English.” For an intellect, it is a relatively simplistic way of grasping the brain’s functions and how the spirit functions.

Sam Harris is examining the brain as if it were a biomechanical computer. Most computers connect to the internet through the Net or the Web. Before they can connect, you must set up the Wi-Fi or connect to a device that enables connectivity. Similarly, the brain has the pineal gland responsible for dreams. This gland produces D.M.T., a substance that can be thought of as a form of “bio Wi-Fi” that connects us to a deeper source of understanding. Some may refer to this source as the unknowable Tao, a concept transcending our comprehension. If a computer is missing components, it cannot connect to the internet. In the same way, if a part of the brain is damaged, it may seek alternative pathways to reach that source of understanding. However, this process can result in losing other functions, such as memory or motor skills. Fortunately, the brain is designed so well that the pineal gland is positioned right in the centre, protected by layers of the grey matter surrounding it.

We know we can measure thoughts by measuring the wavelengths and frequency, yet nothing in the brain holds them (thoughts). Can you create your thoughts in the external world from your mind? And this could explain intuition, so you can still get your message across with a combination of emotions and thoughts. Have you wondered how animals communicate, all based on psychic connectivity? Harris says, “It’s not all intuitive,” it’s intuitive and more. Harris later proclaims that we rise from the brain – this is an attempt to demystify the supernatural. Metaphysics is a study beyond physics; this is basic 101; consciousness is separate from the brain and the body. Harris’s logic is outdated and backward.

Some great books outline the subject of meta-science to unravel an understanding of this topic. (Lee Blaydon), “The Science of Spirituality,” Dalai Lama, “A Universe in a Single Atom,” Dr Moss Amos, “The Basic Code of the Universe”, and Dr Charles T. Tart, “The End of Materialism.”

Richard Feynman, on religious stories, with his glib vocabulary, states: “I can’t believe the special stories that have been made up, they seem too simple, too connected, and too local too provisional, the Earth, they came to the Earth! One of the aspects of God came to Earth! Mind you! And look what’s out there; how can it be in proportion.” Juliana Hatfield, an alternative rock singer, described it well, “Simplicity is Beautiful,” I’m astonished at how he couldn’t say the word Jesus Christ. It’s a typical anti-Christ mindset, a damaging one at that.

The Flower of Life is a symbol that can only be described as simplicity combined with complexity. The understanding of this symbol is more predominant in the minds of the collective, as shown by the example of an embryo splitting into two and then four. Everything in creation comes from this sacred geometric symbol. Yet, no institution, country or culture owns this symbol. I can only emphasize this in small synopsis because the subject is complex. The formation of this symbol can be described as consciousness or Spirit floating in a Void. It then expands its consciousness, resulting in the first circle, and the circle divides and moves to the edge; this creates the Vesica Piscis. Within the Piscis is knowledge of width, length, depth, proportion, square roots of two, three, five, and light information.

It will move five times further, creating the seed of life, or some call it the ‘Genesis pattern.’ Each day of the book of Genesis can equate to each circle of the seed of life. On the second day, the circle moved, thus creating light; the first sentence of Genesis states, “And the Earth was without form, and Void – and darkness was upon the face of the deep, and the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. God said, ‘Let there be light,’ and there was light.” The key here is in the order: God moved, and then came light. After three spheres, you get the Holy Trinity. Half of the creation was completed on the fourth day of creation, and more information was given on the fifth day. On the sixth day, a geometric miracle appeared, and the circle completed a six-pedal flower; therefore, what we know as the Bible’s creation story was accomplished in six days. (Jordan Duchnycz, n.d)

When you continue with more circles, you get the Egg of Life. By connecting those centres, you will see a cube; this is also the morph-genic structure that created your body. Each cell around the egg has Zona Pellucida. If you eliminate that and add more circles, you get the fruit of life with a thirteen-pattern circle. You get Metatron’s Cube by combining male lines to the circles and adding straight lines to every circle. All five platonic solids can be found in Metatron’s Cube. And this is where alchemy and the zero-point energy come from. Everything about the elements of reality is tied together from Plutonic solids that come from Metatron’s cube, which is formed out of the Fruit of Life, which comes from the Flower of Life that Spirit makes. (Jordan Duchnycz, n.d)

Richard Feynman says, “It’s too simple, too connected,” well … ‘yes’ and ‘no,’ and as I mentioned, complexity mixed in with simplicity, his right about being connected and the Tao (God) is a poet. He later says, “Aspect of God came to Earth,” meaning Christ. But, this is hard for some to formulate because it exercises miracles; well, a Buddhist has no problems with miracles, and the practice of Psyche (Magic) was around before Christ. So, by describing the miracle of birth coinciding with the flower of Life, ‘do you see we are the product of miracles and that we are part of the Tao (God)? The only difference with Christ is that he was free from the Adamic X chromosome; this dives into Theology and History for another thesis.

Sam Harris again states: “Let’s say a three-day embryo has a Soul worthy of our moral concern; problems await this description. Embryos can split; we call them identical twins. Is this a case of one splitting into two Souls? Embryos can fuse and become a Chimera. Where is the other Human Soul? It’s time we realize that this arithmetic of souls doesn’t make any sense.” Well, with the flower of life I described, it’s doubling. Embryos splitting means two sets of Flowers of Life, each with its consciousness, made even more special with an inherent psyche connection. As adults, twins can feel their sibling’s emotions, even living in different cities. It only further supports a psyche connection and consciousness. Harris’s strategy to claim that only singular souls per one Embryo can manifest and, therefore, is a speculation of the absoulte; when the egg splits into two, it creates two possibilities, generating its flower of life by which each gets its light and life. 

VS Ramachandran on Split-Brain Patient claims in his lecture: “so, now here’s the big question; do you believe in God? So, the right hemisphere of the brain says yes, and then the same question to the left hemisphere, they answer no. So, here is a human being, with right brain saying yes, left saying no. So, if these people die, does one right hemisphere go to heaven, left hemisphere go to hell.” In the middle of that statement he also says that this finding should have sent Tsunami to the theology community, but it barely made a ripple. It didn’t raise a ripple because it’s not that profound. Instead, their reaction is like an equilibrium water state, and here’s why?

In his lecture on split-brain patients, VS Ramachandran claims: “So, now here’s the big question: do you believe in God? So, the right hemisphere of the brain says yes, and then the same question goes to the left hemisphere, which answers no. So, here is a human being, with the right brain saying yes and the left saying no. So, if these people die, does one right hemisphere go to heaven and the left hemisphere go to hell.” In the middle of that statement, he also says that this finding should have sent Tsunami to the theological community, but it barely made a ripple. It didn’t raise a ripple because it’s not that profound. Instead, their reaction is like an equilibrium water state, and here’s why.

Leonard Susskind says: “I don’t believe intelligence designed the universe; I believe the same way a human being was designed, through random mutation, a bunch of carbon oxygen and other stuff, for that mutation to work on. Upon this basic randomness, statistics and the law of physics that led to this design, the same is true of the universe.” he is talking about evolution through Darwinism.

Dr Stephen Meyer’s book, “Darwin Doubt,” is about the Cambrian explosion and the sudden geological appearance of most major groups of animals in a geological period – called the Cambrian, 530 million years ago. Darwin himself addressed this in his book. Meyer underlines two mysteries surrounding the doubt. Darwin believed life should unfold slowly and gradually. He described life as a branching tree, and at the base of the tree, it represented a one-cell organism, and all the terminal branches represented all the life we see today. The connecting branches represented intermediate forms that rose through time. He also thought this process should slowly unfold because his mechanism for natural selection acting on random variations also had to act gradually. Hence, fossil records came to be. The first significant group of animals came on the scene – fully formed abruptly through the sedimentary layer. (Stephen Meyer, n.d)

Darwin hoped future Palaeontologists could find that missing sequence. However, Meyer describes current Palaeontologist findings as only intensifying the mystery instead of alleviating the problem. Meyer underlines two mysteries concerning the doubt: the mystery of missing fossils and an engineering problem: what is the information generating life? If you want to build a life through non-living chemicals, you need information in the form of D.N.A. – to construct the proteins to make cells viable, but if you want to create a new life from the pre-existing form, you need reams of digital code. This requires everything to be new, and all of those require information. Natural selection and random mutation are inept mechanisms for generating new information; random information degrades, and mutated cells degrade. Finding new genes or proteins for the time allowed in the evolutionary process is mathematically improbable. (Stephen Meyer, n.d)

Meyer describes the intelligent design as the idea of certain features of the biological system that are best explained by an intelligent cause rather than an undirected process, such as natural selection acting on random mutation. (Stephen Meyer, n.d)

Leonard Susskind’s remarks are just opinion-based; they are not facts. Although, by his logic, he should have wavering feelings because of ‘Darwin’s Doubt,’ he believes in a myth formulated by Darwin’s incomplete scientific truth.

Stephen Fry on the natural world says: “The wonder of nature must be taken in its totality, it is a wonderful thing, it’s marvellous, and the ideas of an Atheist or Humanist don’t marvel and wonder at reality, is nonsensical. We wonder all the way; we don’t just stop and say what we don’t understand, I will call God. And this is what humanity has done historically. God was everything 1000 years ago because we understood almost nothing about the natural world, so it could all be God. God receded and receded as we understood more, so suddenly now, he is barely anywhere.”

Stephen Fry is saying that an Atheist or Humanist “goes all the way” in trying to understand how the world works and how things are and disregarding their ability to marvel at nature is nonsensical. And this is untrue because what atheists don’t understand becomes the thing they believe through hypothetical assumptions of what scientists theorize. Which gets blurred into fact and so becomes a stopping point rather than going all the way. Then he assumes we know as much as we did in understanding what we know 1000 to 2000 years ago, and by that, believing in God is people’s default thinking. The truth is never that simple; human history goes as far back as 100,000 years (maybe even millions). We knew a lot more back then than we know now. We were far more intelligent back then (research hidden history, Atlantis and the Mystery Religion). Through Greek history and the Middle Ages and Renaissance, we were at the lowest part of our history in terms of knowledge (with the exclusion of Pythagorean schools and philosophers). We are now waking up to the realization and understanding of our beginnings. Our worldview is now changing from an old Newtonian paradigm to a quantum crystallized spiritual viewpoint, and soon, disbelieving God will recede. This reductionist point of view will also cease to exist in the future.

Garrett Lisi, a particle physicist, describes a discovery in the scientific field (it’s less of a discovery but a rediscovery of what has been written before in esoteric texts) that explains that having automatic free will is a given. Still, we’re also part of a whole. Quantum mechanics suggests a continual branching out of possibilities. As humans, we experience time individually as one possibility. It comes down to the consensus of geometry and its interaction between elementary particles that can be enhanced when everything is in balance. He demonstrates how particles that create point particles work when they plot them out and shows how they move; the result is a string of sacred geometric symbols.             

I’ll conclude with the first verse of the ‘Tao Ti Ching.’ “The Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao. The name that can be named is the eternal name. The Tau is both named and nameless. As nameless, it is the origin of all things; as named, it is the Mother of 10,000 things. Ever desire-less, one can see the mystery; ever desiring, one sees only the manifestations. And the mystery itself is the doorway to all understanding.” – Lao Tza.

.

Reference:

_______________________

Meyer.S n.d., Darwin’s Doubt The explosive origin of animal Life and the Case for intelligent design, Website Interview, viewed 30 Spetember. 2015,http://darwinsdoubt.com

Duchnycz.J n.d., Thoughts, Male & Female, YouTube Video Thesis, viewed 30 September

Lao Tza., Tao Teh Ching, First verse of the Tao the Ching, viewed 30 September 2015,

Rationality Breeds Atheism (01):

.

---

.

Part One: An Examination of Steven Hawking [Originally posted on 27th September 2015]: Most knowledgeable individuals are rationalists, and we hold them in high regard. In contrast, physicists, scientists, and philosophers often communicate in ways that sound intelligent. They can formulate complex mathematics and theories that seem very convincing.

We value what they are saying, and we see them as our leaders, but at the same time, you will find that most of these rationalist thinkers invoke a type of Atheism. However, not all of them are like that. Some know the truth through their experiences and dramatically change their viewpoint. This reversal of ideology gives them more merit; thinkers who changed their point of view are worth listening to even more than their opposite counterparts. Whether they’re aware of it, their counterparts are pushing for another plan that has been around for centuries.

Hawking is part of a group that redefined what we know to be Matter as something entirely different; before this, the assumption was materialistic in its explanation; this line of thinking then morphs into something more elucidated. Soon reinterpretation of points of Matter spread through time, and the notion of location began to give way to probabilities. The new view of Matter had a mentalist state of interpretation; it was no longer about transfixed calculations and variable energies and more about the possibility. And this started one of the first waves of groups to describe Matter as something that can tie in with spirit; this new paradigm shift is a u-turn from the intellectual universe that would halter such thinking. With this recent emergence, it would Link Matter with emotions.    

 We go about our days not realizing we move in the realm of spirit; this unintentional awareness is due to years of conditioning, the slow persuasion of an intelligent system, which gives no credence to spirit. Therefore, any validation we give ourselves is derided when it’s the effect of that conditioning. Hawking would take the new interpretation of probabilities to his own and apply it to astrophysics (non-science), resulting in a mixed bag of fiction and non-fiction equations.    

Most Physicists are still approaching their viewpoint in the Newtonian era of thinking (the mechanistic, linear way of thinking). It collects high-level math but dismisses what it means. They will push aside any notion of consciousness, free will, and the connection of all things. If they did, they would have to question or at least add to their calculation God, and that’s unacceptable to them.    

But with any worldview, much like ideologies, it can change – a developmental issue can start to occur; throughout history, we can determine this, but history itself is not subject to change except when it becomes a myth. Science has always been about evolving to change within paradigms. Thomas Coon, a sociologist, suggests that science develops through revolutions; an example is by examining the followers of Aristotle (Aristotelianism) that within their environment made good sense. The idea is that Matter is intrinsic to earth, with fire and water. And how objects move, that those objects moved in perfect circles and that God had made the universe in a particular way. All these things made rational sense with our understanding of the universe at the time. But with any world view, seeds of change are often planted, with Newton coming along and changing the normal perception that soon began the Newtonian perspective.      

And this allowed people to have a more comprehensive understanding of the universe and how this can occur by being aware of things that cannot be explained. For example, in the Aristotelian worldview, the problem that arose was the retrograde motion of the planets, whereby the Earth was at the centre of the solar system. All the planets and the sun revolved around the Earth in perfect circles; you would be able to calculate how they move across the sky throughout the year, but certain planets went backwards in a retrograde motion. And this made no sense within the world view, so the Aristotelian scientist came up with a notion called epicycle; these were complex mathematical structures to keep alive the paradigm that matches their false truth about how the universe worked.   

Copernicus came along with other individuals and suggested that changing our worldview and recognizing that Earth revolved around the Sun and Mercury and Venus were closer to the Sun could immediately explain retrograde motion. Then Newton came along and explained Gravity; however, our understanding of Gravity is different from what Newton was trying to convey. All this resulted in a new/current world view; two in half centuries later would bring about the Quantum revolution made famous by Max Plank.

There is still this undeniable fact that within any worldview come this underlying problem of how the Universe functions in totality. In doing so, the scientific community must get over one huge problem. This problem was suggested in 1994 by (David Chalmers) a young Australian Physicist and Philosopher; he indicated that there is no explanation of how inanimate Matter and Atoms and Electricity within the brain can create consciousness because consciousness is a different thing from physical processes.

So, this is the current modernity; this is where science and spirituality are slowly becoming related, where once believing in spirituality or God became boxed into categories, and in this case, the superstitious box, this separation held us back for more than half a century.

Unlike Hawking, Newton was a wiser man than he was (I say ‘was’ as past tense because I believe the real Hawking died, and what we have instead is a puppet and ‘anti-Hawking’). Newton came up with the notion of Gravity upon sitting underneath an apple tree, and the apple has had fallen on his head gave him a moment of clarity for Gravity to emerge (there is meaningful symbolism in this story). Unfortunately, Gravity seems to be a loaded argument among Flat Earthers. And they claim it doesn’t exist in a sense that applies to the hyperreal-space notion. Suggesting a redefinition of Gravity and only applying it to density and dimensions gives it more credibility. And this is similar to what Hawking has done; he appropriated and applied hyperreal-space notions to probabilities, applying an illusion to probabilities that would result in nothing when you know the illusion no longer exists. 

Newton was a wiser man because he spent his remaining years decoding the universe, his surroundings, and the goings on that surrounded him. He viewed himself as a prophet of God. He wrote under numerous pseudonyms that coincided with his decoding method of deciphering anagrams. Mathematician John Nash would report similar findings though his process may be different.    

On being an Atheist or Agnostic: An Agnostic is just an Atheist free from blame, who would view the universe or the world as an automatic machine without a creator. In contrast, you can describe that being an agnostic is not having any certainty of ideological belief systems, which seems to give credibility. That’s because the heart of agnosticism is about opening up the interior space in which to “know” (to be gnostic), one must be ruthlessly honest with oneself about what one doesn’t know. I don’t believe in this notion that you have to be agnostic to be gnostic. Only because a person I’ve known for about 30 years described himself as an agnostic but would call me an ‘idiot’ for not believing in the moon landings, there is no openness to the truth when you’re simultaneously demoralized. Agnostics’ central assertion is that God or divine reality is unknowable, a reduction and seemingly untrue. It would seem they want to believe and to be shown the truth but aren’t inherently open to it, but on their surface, they are. And this is the state of mind in which the Scientism groups are.   

Steven Hawking says, “M theory doesn’t disprove god, but it makes him unnecessary it predicts that the universe will be spontaneously created by nothing, without the need for a creator.” There are a few things with this quote that raises questions. First, let’s put an underline under the word theory meaning it’s incomplete, and science is about seeking truth in its purest form. But because they can make mathematical equations about this subject, we pass it off as truth. Second, how can something come into being without creation? There has to be something to be nothing; in other words, if nothing is all, then it’s oblivion, but because the theory is the ‘big bang,’ there had to be something for nothing to be created. So in actuality, it makes God very necessary.

Mike Adams from divinitynews.com outlines Steven Hawkins’s views – on page one of Hawkins’s book, the Grand Design, it has a quote in which he says: “philosophy is dead; philosophy has not kept up with modern developments in science, particularly physics.” This arrogant statement infers that philosophy’s success can only be measured by the degree to which it keeps up with physics. Only physics alone can best understand everything; the grand design will come apparent if we can work out the math. Studying sub-atomic particles is the way to understand the mystery of being, those tiny moments and fractions that unfurl moments before the big bang. To kill philosophy is to kill of questions only philosophy can answer, questions like; what is consciousness? Is there a God? What happens after death? How do we know what we know? What does it mean to exist? Can love be measured? How does consciousness interact with matter and energy? And why are we here? (Mike Adams, n.d)

The God particle isn’t a particle: particle physicists who study particles don’t study particles because everybody knows when observing such things, it moves away. So instead, they study probability waves left behind from the particles. What they have discovered during these studies is the notion of consciousness, that consciousness collapses waves of probability into seemingly real particles – into our seemingly real world. Without consciousness and the observer, there is nothing to translate the apparent laws of physics to observable and testable events in the first place. Physics cannot be fully explained without taking consciousness into consideration. (Mike Adams, n.d)

Some of Hawking’s main contentions in his book emphasize that “we are all robots” (this is funny considering the high probability that he is a puppet agent who functions like a robot). Hawking does not believe in consciousness or free will. He firmly believes we are just deterministic machines that behave like biological puppets, driven by predictable mechanistic bio-mechanical impulses. He states: “though we feel that we can choose what we do, our understanding of the molecular basis of biological processes are governed by the laws of physics and chemistry and therefore are as determined as the orbits of the planets.” “Recent experiments in neuroscience support the view that our physical brain following the known laws of science determines our actions and not some agency that exists outside those laws.” 

Francis Crick, the co-discoverer of D.N.A, conveys that awareness is no more than a feeling generated in the brain. He says, “You, your joys and sorrows, your memories and your ambitions, your sense of personal identity and free will, are in fact no more than the behaviour of a vast assembly of nerve cells and their associated molecules.” In his book, ‘The Astonishing Hypothesis,’ both these authors firmly believe that we are just mindless robots with no souls. One can only ask, who then wrote their books, was the ‘Grand Design’ merely a spontaneous regurgitation of neurological ricochets cascading through his head without any intention behind them. Within this logic, his book is a mindless account of physics. (Mike Adams, n.d)

Hawking would also convey that recent research on the human brain can be determined by certain parts of the brain when electrically stimulated, it would make certain body parts move, and it could even make the lips move and talk. So, with this evidence, he would suggest that we have no free will. And this is a reductionist notion to convey; you can tie a string in my hand and move it like a puppet. It doesn’t mean I can’t choose to move it on my own with conscience intentions, translated through the body and to the brain. Hawking only proves that by artificially inducing electrical stimuli in the brain, there is a biological component to our existence, not that the biological component is in its entirety. (Mike Adams, n.d)

Hawking’s deterministic and reductionist views are dangerous, especially describing humanity as mindless robots. Determinism’s definition is the state of affairs, including every human decision and action; it is the inevitable and necessary consequence of the antecedent state of affairs. So, by definition, it can absolve anyone from any responsibility they choose to act on, even criminal acts, because they were just working through bio-mechanical impulses through no fault of their own. And so this idea is stretched so far as to be used to foreshadow any ethics. And then it can be a seed to commit outrageous crimes such as genocide or some de-population agendas, all in the name of a baseless scientific concept, this concept of a mindless, soulless, bio-mechanical machine. Steven Hawkins states, “Ethics hasn’t kept up with physics,” but at a closer inspection, it is physics that hasn’t kept up with ethics. (Mike Adams, n.d)

There are waves of these rational thinkers that think similarly in this way, invoking that a belief in God is irrational. People like Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hicks, Lord Martin Rees, Sam Harris, Richard Feynman, Noam Chomsky, Stephen Fry, Leonard Susskind, Bertrand Russell, Richard Carrier, Sir David Attenborough, Neil Degrasse and VS Ramachandran. I can’t go into detail for all of these people because the main contention for this thesis is Hawkins; that’s not to say they are free from analysis or examination of their teachings and preaching; that’s for another article down the line.

When asked any prudent theistic question, they all have a predictable, calculated explanation of their doctrines; they use a sense of magic in their vocabulary to trick or, more precisely, deflate the question. A perfect example of this is Christopher Hicks, you listen to any of his lectures, and it’s like listening to the character, the “Architect” from the Matrix. They do this because the question itself is far more profound than any high calculation or vocabulary; the question asks you to look within, like, “Who are you”?

These are knowledgeable people, well-read and eloquent in their field, does not mean we should take their word for truth. Much of what they say is true but tends to miss out on many literary facts, predominately religious history and spiritual and philosophical myths. They disdain the mysterious dogma so much that their science mutates towards scientism, which in turn becomes their dogma. They will always mention the religious atrocities that have happened in the past while leaving out important information regarding that the early mystery Christian-religion institutions were the subject of infiltration from highly funded secret groups, insidious would then push their agenda. Not all sacred institutions are free from this malicious group; the Muslim countries are the last institutions holding up a fight.

One must wonder if the Atheist groups are pushing for this Globalized/NWO agenda. Recent evidence promotes this to be the case. You’d only have to look at their chosen logo for this nihilistic group, its two lines from the pentagram symbol; incidentally, a symbol that warns of bad spirits.

It could be said that such high intelligence makes you think too much and by that you lose touch of what is real. Ultimately a belief in God is so simple to understand and easy to reach if one is initiated, Christ says “God is within,” the truth is, if you seek truth you’re simultaneously seeking God. It comes easy to people who are spiritually awaken. In order to be awakened you have to be open, but not in the way that views an inverted look at agnosticism, but to be open in a more spiritual gnostic sense, hence “god is within.”

Peter Russell worked with Steve Hawking when Hawking’s condition started to manifest physically. He is a mathematician and is an excellent example of a rational, pragmatic scientist taking a u-turn from conventional science and delving into meta-physic science. He combines the study of spirituality with science, which results in some comparative and interesting viewpoints. He travelled to the east and learnt the myth of Indian theology. His books “Waking Up in Time” and “From Science to God” can better illustrate subjects like free will, determinism, and consciousness. His approach to meditation, spirituality and questioning existence is relevant.

Many people think Hawking’s life is a charade when he is a puppet and that early in his career, he found something that could change the perspectives of how we view the world. Maybe so poignant that those views of conventional physics could change the mindset of the rationale community, but before he could deploy the changing paradigm, he was stopped. The voice you hear is not his own; the context from that backward technological voice box is not his own. The notion delves into the conspiracy realm; nevertheless, some conspiracy turns out to be true.

And this is just speculation on Hawking’s story, and would also perpetuate a false dichotomy about a hyperreal space, never the less. Before, the guys in black suits came for him. Could it be that what he found was, in fact – from the words of Jed McKenna; “That the universe isn’t expanding forward, but expanding backwards, all the seemingly infinite particles and fragments coming together following an incalculable precise trajectory back to wholeness. Fitting themselves together with miraculous an un-airing accuracy, and by observing the perfection of any part, we know the perfection of the whole. The universe isn’t flying apart, but flying together.” (Jed McKenna, n.d).

.

Michael Keefe.

.

_______________________

Reference:

Adams.M n.d., The God Within, YouTube Video Thesis, DivinityNow.com viewed 27 September

McKenna. J n.d., Spiritually Incorrect Enlightenment, All will arrive, YouTube Video Thesis, viewed 27 September