Occultism and Post-awakening Natures:

.

.

---

.

Countries Don’t Build Culture; Music and the Fungus Among Us Does [Posted initially on 16th June 2021]:  In the last few posts, we covered general semantics to cure blockages in one’s states of consciousness (towards a higher spiritual goal or oneness). However, these underlying matters must be recognised, such as the etymologies of the word and its use in modern society juxtaposed with its historical meaning. The text discusses manipulating images and symbols to create new meanings. This includes simplifying or reducing them to a basic or debased version of the original concept, particularly concerning the word “occult.” It also mentions the practice of altering words slightly while changing their definitions. If one cannot reconcile these changes, it’s best to acknowledge their existence and continue life as usual.

For decades, the university hosted a multicultural event in my town where groups with different national backgrounds, from various long-standing generations to early immigrants, celebrated their cultural heritage with dance, music, and food. Showcasing the many other traditional and ethnic cultures that suburban traditional homes might not be aware of. Intellectuals often use politically correct terminology to promote their views, especially when discussing multiculturalism. However, this term needs to be more accurate, and its definition needs to be revised. It is essential to understand that while multiculturalism may be a contested concept, multiracialism does exist. Multiracialism refers to individuals who are the offspring of two different cultural traditions.

These attempts to redefine an established concept, as culture cannot change, grow, or transform into something entirely new. For example, consider early paganism before occult traditions and mystery cults emerged. These early practitioners revered nature and expressed this reverence by celebrating the harvest during the early agricultural era. Their celebrations took the form of rituals, which evolved into mythology featuring various deities representing fertility and nature. The recognised system was closely tied to their cosmology, which recognised the sun’s journey into the underworld during sunset. Over time, these beliefs would evolve into something more dynamic.

Some have equated this dynamic change through psychedelic mushrooms, made evident through McKenna’s work on psychedelic mushrooms, which stated that early civilisations introduction of psychedelic fungus [magic-mushrooms] in the food source of early agriculture civilisations gave new rise to spirits and gods. Out of that came shamanism, which then was codified and became a religion. It became a celebration by tribes, and they would gather after the hunt and bang on the drums around the fire. The entheogenic trance of those drum beats would be reconstituted or reborn in the mystery religion of the Dionysian expression of musical culture. Occult tradition’s understanding of ‘time’ was extended in their music, which required dancing and singing around a communal experience.

These were counter-cultural movements of that time, meaning they went against the Church, so Mystery cults became a rebellion against the authoritarian state-cult gods of Zeus. The mystery cults elevated the minor gods as the saviour godhead, notably Dionysus and Isis. Isis incorporated other goddesses’ archetypes with their identity. And we know Isis turned into Mary. The Isis’s cult, with its initiation process, is described as ecstatic and psychedelic.

The Church’s suppression and patriarchal dominance didn’t outweigh those movements but only refined those expressions. In modern times, in the guise of new Christianity, centre-right intellects have equated this type of religious authoritarianism as the evolution of Judaic-Christian ethics, and it is what holds Western societies in check from slipping into chaos. Could this be an ethical imperative since everyone has a sense of just and unjustness? This would later be an abstraction in the form of fair or unfair. Is it ideology posing as truth and the accompanying certainty of belief? The antithesis force that comes with it is that other thing I mentioned, ‘the rock that’s attached to the one who can call spirits’, but in this case, it’s the constant ambition of self-interest. Evangelical Christianity is a canonization of suburban-capitalist consumer culture and has nothing to do with historical Christianity at all. It’s all about convenience and consumerism.                

These movements extrapolated among the many other cult-centred groups of the ancient mystery world, culminating in the Dionysian cult, which explored public sex, singing, dancing, and inebriation. The Dionysians incorporated the mysteries of Demeter, Isis, Kybele, and Mithras. Early cult groups in the mountains started these types of music and rituals—they became a culture full of vibrancy as they moved west to Greece and Rome.        

The contention I’m trying to make here is that two cultures of different expressions may not cohere in a multi-cultural sense from a technicality viewpoint [definition]. However, the underlying constant here is music and the growth of new cultures that can be derived from it. All of the different tribes of the world have danced around the fire at one point, and its synthesis grew into something else, something new, and the details and differences in that process are merely semantic. Some cultural-inclusive-individuality guides the resistance to this view. While this is important, it only ever relates to cultures and their nations that have a long history. Countries built on federation don’t have this ‘history’, and their culture is derived from an amalgamation of different cultures from different countries alongside their history. And even those countries with a long history have a modern model of civilisation and society that aligns with those federation countries, the model of capitalism. And so, in many ways, culture is a memory of history. 

Memory and history often lead to romantic myths. The idea of Rome prevails in New Atlantis and New Jerusalem. New Jerusalem is the romantic idea presented in a Manichean manner [light vs. dark]. The avenging superhero [gods] that may choose at will to do good or evil things. Or become fragile and can only find strength in reason by becoming a creature [possessed], so it loses itself, detached from life. However, ethics is the opposite of romantic tendencies. In reality, New Jerusalem is really about the return of Jews to Palestine, described by the Anglo-sphere [Britain, US, Australia, Canada] as a significant moment in history. Fulfilling an ongoing realization for the revelation of the Bible – where Biblical demands were part of the last phase in the European colonization plan. However, these religious principles are centred in the United States since Christian Zionism goes further back than Jewish Zionism. Israel is essentially a military stronghold for the U.S., and whether it’s a good thing or bad thing is always debated endlessly.        

Throughout the centuries, the excitement of the mystery cults was put to rest when Rome went from worshipping sky-gods and headed towards individualism towards authoritarianism and a consolidated synthesis god. This would then lead to the rise of Henotheism, which would later become Christianity, and the of-shoot of that would become Christianity, with the idea of elevating one god above all other gods. As we covered, this was a guise: the one-god [solar saviour] is not different to any other sky-gods [Jupiter]. The idea was more important as it was far-reaching.

The mystery cults would have gone underground disappeared or was forgotten. Its magical practices and ideals would re-materialize or be co-opted as secret society cults like Freemasonry and Templars. Freemasonry originates from the middle Ages, in fraternities of actual stonemasons. They would interact with other secret groups inspired by the mystery-cults like Rosicrucians, Kabbalists and Alchemists, and this interaction were the basis of a new revival of the ancient mysteries in Europe. Freemasonry gets a lot of credit from Christian-conspiracy-theorist, who act as a reveller of truth for the people but, at times, do the very opposite, thereby invoking a type of controlled opposition. Anti-masonic revolution would rise in France, and these secret groups would find themselves in Scotland.  

In reality, Freemasons in the late 17th century did not reflect the ancient world [but tried to be in a romantic sense] because most of the ancient text hadn’t been discovered or translated yet. The early revolutionary period worked its way through secret masonic lodges. They broke away from England and created the confederation of the United States as a new governmental system. Successful revolutionaries often become reactionary, and after the Revolutionary War, they were ruled by the ruling class. During that time, you had settlers and explorers who were part of masonic groups around the new country and constantly disagreed with each other, usually over land titles. Not all founding Fathers were Freemasons, but most were part of other particular secret orders and often were rivals.            

There have always been ‘Cults’ [secret societies] throughout cultural civilisations. A misconception is that they are an aberration, but this is untrue. They were the rock to those who could call spirits, but it would seem they’ve become the rock who can contact spirits and rule a country. While the rest of the people would experience great forgetting, the spark within them would be extinguished. A modern notion of secret societies is just the elite ruling class that has sway over managerial governance—an elite ruling class that is very religious, capitalistic, and pro-Empire.  

Choose the Middle Way: From here on, civilisations embraced secular beliefs from a satellized cosmos [Atheism] to a form of theistic Christianity [a paradoxical theology] that followed that same idea but with a firm belief in God. Because both are secular in many ways, both have gone (and are going) through their versions of a micro model of the fall of Rome. The collapse of confidence in institutional Christianity paved the way for Atheism, which began with the satellite idea, which is still present in the modern day. The fall of Christianity started with the notion of ushering in the kingdom of God, which was/is played out in the middle-east … a continuous undertaking that started many centuries ago. Right-centric Christians believe that what had held American society together, which is ‘Christianity’, has begun to implode. And what replaced it was Atheism and Nihilism. Although at this stage, it’s fifty-fifty [meaning for a half millennia, both religion and atheism concepts were present] because it’s an assumption to conclude that Christianity or society acting out the Christian ideal is the sole factor for stability in society when this is just an ethical imperative brought about by reason not so much religion. Let’s not forget that reason is only a tool to help us deal with many shades of ethics and is not the source of truth. Treating it as such leads to relativism.    

Both camps, Christian Religion and Atheism-Scientism, like to use ideology that poses as truth – and both have ambition for self-interest. Self-interest [narcissism, to a lesser extent] does not hold the core of our ethical principles. Take, for instance, Evangelicalism, which would become a modern concoction for corporations as an adversary for Bolshevism in the 1920s. Along with this denomination grew the fear – a fear of something that hasn’t been around for almost 100 years. At the same time, they preach a version of their truth alongside a post-Bolshevism fear – a fear with missing context is an ideological reason and not so much for God.

Atheism, new atheism, and scientism use reason and general semantics—exceptionally corrupted orders of abstraction—as tools against arguments. To them, ‘reason’ is the only thing that can articulate ethics, and our imagination and memory are inferior to reason. Their problem is approaching ethics as a sub-genre of reason. However, it’s about the assumption of intellectual form, central to distancing ethics from real life. A satellized worldview is also flexible enough to have a God in its equation [at least for theistic Christians]. So an Atheistic Cosmos [and its off-shoots evolution, etc.] along with the Christian ideal had both held together society. The contention as to whether each side was responsible for causing more chaos, I will leave that for debate. Just consider that wars have broken out in the last two centuries, and there is the ongoing mandate for heaven on earth to mirror a modern war in heaven. And that it was Christian Civilisation that took part in the mascara of Jews in the world.          

So, there is only falling with the other. It’s not that Christianity imploded and took on Nihilism as a consequence of Atheism, which gave rise to communism; perhaps this is a misconception, given communism is a religion without a theistic aspect. A better claim is to suggest a point of measure that a percentage of Christians took on Nihilism. Fundamentalism’s inherent fear of communism is an intrinsic dysfunction. Communism to right-centric Christians is rather like their debased definition of occultism that mirrors an occult of personality ideology rather than what it is – an unethical and immoral increase of power to the government and the occult as something hidden or secret. Although it became two modes of the same ideal, Atheism and religion, it’s just that Atheism likes to act out a religious structure rather than deny it. There is also this false assumption that Atheism and the rest of its ideological subsidiaries, nu-atheism, scientism, etc., are not masonic [remember, it’s a religion without the theistic aspect]. 

The two modes share a commonality in that they are both religious. However, this is often portrayed as a split between two opposing viewpoints. The public perception is that a divide exists similar to the one seen in early Greece, characterized by a conflict between the mythical and the rational mindsets. This divide manifests today in the contrast between Atheism and Theism, with both sides employing various argumentative models to support their positions. Atheism often incorporates ideas of objective morality and scientism—not to be confused with science but rather an approach that aligns more closely with faith—which can be challenging to counter. In response, Theism takes the arguments posed by Atheism and asks, “Who is responsible for the existence of all these elements?” It also introduces animism to argue for a supernatural being rather than a purely supernatural power in its reasoning. Atheism, on the other hand, tends to focus less on who is responsible and more on understanding how things function. Thus, the debate continues indefinitely.

The mythical to the rationale [logical] was a gradual process in the early times, and Plato played both sides. This would bring us forward to the age of reason. I believe today there is the same movement but in reverse – there is an apparent uptake of the mythical to the rationale. However, those types of splits back then were never clear-cut or absolute. Francis Cornford [Religion to Philosophy] made this aware that both dictums are needed; he called the two permanent needs of human nature.      

To elaborate further on these splits being in reverse today, we first must understand that early philosophy could hold to myths symbolically rather than literally. Then, the essential split would take form, not in the explicit but in a literal sense, by trying to understand what symbols mean in a larger symbolic way. This is what the Neo-Platonists started to do. They, however, would lose their grip with the rise of the practical (or quantifiable) way. This approach gained favour throughout the decades, so the idea of the imagination took a back seat. The mythical traditions, having had a cognitive grasp on how we perceive the world, were undermined.      

However, in our modern time, there is an apparent reversal that what we hold as quantifiable or practical is being exposed as false or a simulacrum. And this is mainly due to scientism, and to combat this fall – in a last-ditch effort, they [possibly] instigated a program called ‘Woke.’ However, the question of whether it’s a conspiracy or something that came about organically – is put into question. Scientism has come undone, realised in the scientism community upon their technocratic and futurist endeavours, having had nothing to show for it. All their efforts, even with all the billions of dollars given to their programs, cannot be denied.       

The implosion of Christianity and the rise of communism is more about a fundamentalist fear of old gods awakening and, therefore, a fear of our imagination rising. And more so in the fear that protestant-religion may go more gnostic or even Catholic. The truer fear is the change away from the status quo of a static religion. Due to religious idolatry, dogmatism, narcissism, corporatism, and being pro-military/empire – the so-called Christian conspiracy theory groups happened to act more like damage controllers than altruistic speakers of the morally just. This can all be stifling and cult-like, which incidentally mirrors the same kinds of processes being made with woke.

Therefore, the inevitable change from both sides takes form through changing camps. One can only hope one chooses the middle way rather than switching from one extreme to another. And having awakened from psycho-spiritual transformations, you’ve come to realise you are living in a simulated satellized-cosmos. And you come to know it’s one domino in an effect that grew a life of its own. Furthermore, realising a split in the conscious reality also wreaks havoc on consensus reality. Or, instead, perhaps our holographic reality is changing because of that split.

Woke Woke and Cult Jam: French philosophers took on the idea that words, ideas, and thoughts are patterns with traces that never really go away. So, if you use a word associated with something terrible and if that word is still used today, then it carries a negative trait. The moral panic on the psychological side is fuelled by an incomprehensible idea that words have to mean what they mean in the first place.

This is similar to my earlier contention about etymologies [Restraint and Catharsis post]. How ‘words’ are used in modern society juxtaposed with their historical meaning, and not just the history, the idea of context because it must be heard in the context of others at that time [which requires memory] – this is when memory can morph into its opposite. This is why I defend the word multiculturalism because people must hear it in the context of this [present] time. Funny enough, this contention was raised by centre-right intellects [who didn’t believe in the definition of multiculturalism] to separate politically-correct-contention in ‘words’ for articulation and differentiating oneself from politically correct concepts with woke-ism [which has other connotations].           

Moral panic, on the psychological side, combines the corruption in the levels of abstraction I discussed in general semantics with ‘reason’ as a tool. For instance, film director James Gunn faced condemnation on Twitter for joking about controversial subjects. These posts, made over a decade ago, were already addressed by Gunn with an apology. However, they were resurfaced and seized upon by conservative Christian groups, leading to Gunn being vilified long after the original events. This situation predates the era of cancel culture and did not involve so-called woke groups. This dynamic overlooks personal growth, suggesting that a person’s past actions will forever define who they are.

The contention I’m trying to make here is that the tools, for a reason, are not the culprit. They’re just the tools. It’s the varying groups that wield it. Blaming it on the tools opens it up for confusion and generalisations towards an idea that is predominately safe. This confusion would be a modern misunderstanding. This pre-cancel culture would find itself in the woke group, which happens to have no religious structure but acquired religious cult ideologies as well as religious cult processes for indoctrination. That uses tools for reason as a mechanism in which there is no way to argue.

The result will entail scenarios such as this: white middle-class people wrestling with inner fears about race, and within their inner turmoil [white-fragility], concluded that the very act of wrestling with it means all white people are, therefore, also conflicted [racist]. Not only is there this narcissistic quality entailing the assumption that one white person is the spokesperson for an entire group of people, but a quality inherent to fundamentalist-Christian-(Conspiracy)-groups, and that is solipsism. Although in this variant, ‘I exist and everyone else is an illusion,’ in as much as ‘when my thoughts change, so does everyone else.’ They have not concluded that their inner turmoil lies within them only.     

In general semantics, the referent must be experienced to function as quality or a ‘thing’. From here, it would go towards ‘reference’, which is about acquiring states of consciousness [memory or thought files]. How does one go from referent to reference when the context of meaning for the word changes every often? The answer is your intuition. The success of falsely labelling woke-isim as a radical-left, Postmodern or cultural Marxism exemplifies what I’m talking about. Remember, cultural Marxism has never been about culture but about class. Woke-isim is normative, not postmodern, and non-ideological. The confusion lays in postmodernism jargon being appropriated by woke-isim, hence the false label to which centre-right intellects have popularised it. However, we know we can’t go from referent to label without the reference, without the relationship of function.    

Another example of mislabelling and exclusion of quality is when the ‘right’ purposely mislabels the word ‘fascism’ or ‘Nazism’ as a leftist or socialist ideology. There is only one problem: This argument is untrue. Although the Nazis did pursue a level of government intervention in the economy that would shock doctrinaire free marketeers, their “socialism” was, at best, a secondary element in their appeal. ‘What’s in a name’ – Shakespeare. The Nazi regime had little to do with socialism, despite it being prominently included in the name of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party.

The concept of the simulacrum, which involves the transformation of opposites to sustain itself in a controlled form, can be utilised as a tool, similar to a Trojan Horse. This approach distances people from the fear of ethics, suggesting that ethics may be appropriated by any specific religious or non-religious group, thereby emphasising perceived divisions and differences. However, one can observe no objective ethical differences across all significant religions when examining the hierarchy of spirits or gods. Ultimately, the focus shifts to developing the erroneous aspects of abstract orders. For example, the Quran reflects many themes found in Judaic and Christian texts.

The standard or confusion in the orders of abstraction towards Islam is that Islam is violently militant, promotes its martyrs to paradise and admires revenge. But Christianity has precisely the same tendencies within it. Both cases are expressions of ‘transcendental good intentions,’ not of their ethics. When it comes to history, Christian militancy has wreaked far greater destruction than anything managed by Islam. The ongoing mission for New Jerusalem and the war in heaven is further clarified when we know Christian Zionism predates Jewish Zionism. This can indicate European and North American aggressive nature towards Arabs. And that over the last half-century, it has less to do with Middle Eastern politics but almost a psychotic need to forget. This comes from a guilt-ridden past that entailed Christian civilisation’s responsibility for past atrocities like the genocide of six million Jews.

You will better understand what woke is because of this guilt-ridden past. This guilt would manifest in the West as a wound through civil-religious movement [shared spiritual, political, moral vision and ideology with a national foundational impact] with German guilt pride. It’s grounded in Christianity and republic pride, focusing on activism, moralism and social issues. It marks a shift from theological transcendent values. Civil religion had schisms that matched modern-day political schisms. Woke-isim and what it is to be a leftist is fundamentally in opposition, meaning woke-isim has never been leftist but is post-leftist.

When it comes to left and right politics, its experience or quality is different from what it once was. Left meant a republican mindset – and the right meant a monarchy mindset. This would change with the rise of Marxism and became more of a socio-economic designation. The left became more of a socialist who was more critical of capitalism and took on working-class causes. The right became a modern capitalist, which favoured a liberal market and was anti-communist. It’s a modern misconception to think woke-isim comes from the left because leftism is with identity politics, and woke-isim is not primarily political or economic but about identity or hyper-individualism. It doesn’t value class issues or capitalism’s struggle, so it aligns more with the left of neo-liberalism.      

German guilt-pride is a reactionary idea stemming from post-war Germany, where the country was divided about their fascist past. In East Germany, notions of Communist Germany found themselves anti-fascist. They saw themselves as victims of the Nazis as well as liberators for Germany from fascism. West Germany acknowledges that it was a state of Nazi Germany, but it also believes that it was also a crime. So, they admit the guilt but simultaneously adopt a sort of penance to clear away the debt for that crime. After the breakdown of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, Germany united from their schism. They formed a new Germany symbolised in the holocaust memorial centre, representing the acceptance of guilt but also knowing that it can never be paid off. Guilt inherited from previous generations is internalised. Paradoxically, with this admittance, they have elevated themselves morally and can be proud of accepting such enormous guilt.   

Guilt-pride becomes this paradoxical redemption and moral self-elevation through guilt admission. The same can be said with former Prime Minister of Australia Kevin Rudd apologising to the Indigenous people of Australia and Torres Strait Islanders in 2008. Woke-isim is this sort of German-style guilt pride in identity politics that took form in 1989 after the breakdown of communism and the fall of the Cold War. However, America is problematic as they’re deeply proud, and adhering to notions of ‘admission’ is probably out of the question. Still, it can’t deny the fact their guilt is deeply rooted in colonialism and slavery. Having no guilt admission, it manifested itself in woke – a combination of American individualistic liberalism and civil religion with a strong focus on identity.    

Now you know what woke is all about. It doesn’t make it less dogmatic than any other cult religion with certain taboos and thoughts. Even humour becomes suspect. The dogmatic side comes from this decisive-morality component that parallels Biblical notions like Matt 12:30: ‘He who is not me is against me, and he who does not gather with me scatters abroad.’ This binary good vs. bad distinction gives no credence to a middle ground. Then, this ritualistic conformity became popular among celebrities and Hollywood studios. Then there is the woke washing of capitalism and imperialism, which serves as a moralistic profile creation of capitalist and imperialist institutions [the intelligent agencies vs. billionaires]. Then, there is this strong personal internalisation of woke-isim that matches the zealotry of fundamentalism.  

At the same time, there are these complex issues regarding culture in countries built on a federation state with no real history compared to those with it [particularly of identity]. On the other hand, the Chinese gave us the Tao Te Ching, yet most of them do not live out those philosophies. This could be the effect of countries with longer histories becoming static. While in relatively newly formed countries, this energy matches those early mystery cults of Greece. The negative impact of this federation enterprise, however, would come into effect among the disenfranchised white males, having had no real identity to cling to. They have this emptiness among those generations, even though they are among other ethnic cultures [perhaps there are these micro-cultural-separations]. Having no real identity, they started heading towards something ecstatic or metal, a new rebellion. Like the rise of punk culture intermingled with the increase of (Nazi) skinheads during the late 70s and early 80s. However, beyond that dreary cultural descent, other micro-cultures started to arise, and they became leaders in cultural trends.

However, anything culturally related is under threat by woke-isim, and so one must realise that institutions or cults do not hold our imagination. They are only the rock to those that can call spirits. Imagination transcends the self, and Adam Smith elaborates on this truism. Realising that we don’t initially have ‘immediate experience’ of what others experience or feel. We can only try to conceive what they experience and feel. And it’s by the imagination that we can form any conception of what others think. So, here lies the heart of society, and it’s anti-narcissistic, or at least that’s what we wish it to be.

Both imagination and ethics are not inherently romantic, and talented people are not automatically romantic either; they possess exceptional skills. Along with the transcendent self and the intuitive act, these abilities can be a powerful force for creativity. It’s important to remember that assigning cultural heritage to the subject of creation cannot be owned. The concept of “woke” often struggles with shared knowledge as a form of common sense. It does not attempt to own the subject but seeks to dictate who promotes creative subjects for a specific agenda. This limitation prevents it from reaching beyond itself to engage with a sense of the other, a key aspect of true imagination, allowing creativity to be free from dictation or agenda.                          

The Dionysian expression of Drum Beats is the modern expression of syncopated breakbeats intermingled with loops and acapellas rhythmically accentuated with scratch notations of turntables, mixers, and beat pads. The marriage doesn’t end there, as the Dionysian expression of dance is modernised as breakdancers pop to a tune developed by a musically synchronistic madman on the turntables. The dance engulfs amazement as they play out the cymatic sound of musicality and language coming to life in dance.          

.

.

Occultism and Post-awakening Natures:

.

.

---

.

Darwin Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Creationism) [Posted initially on 03rd June 2021]: Science misrepresents itself by excluding other notions that don’t match their rigid interpretation, resulting in a transfixed interpretation that hinders the intellectual development of undecided people. The last post raised a question regarding how one acquires memory files [images] or states of consciousness for the quantum world – given we can only describe it but not see it. This invokes faith, but in the scientific world, they call this a ‘theory.’ This is essentially a play on words; the false-to-fact referent is similar to calling ‘Man’ a ‘Person,’ which are similar but distinct.

To them, science theory is the highest-level form of referent because it’s supposedly well-supported and open to refinement. What if their foundation and support are proven wrong? Would they change their mind? Are they open to refinement? The answer is ‘no’ because their support is found in self-referentialism, which is always tunnelled through specialisation and privileged access to truth. Incidentally, this is not for them because that’s for science, but they’ve adopted it as scientism—man as Persons, Science as Scientism, and scientism as truth.     

The levels of foolishness and prejudice among the self-appointed guardians of reason are the most vocal people in the media. However, they’ve become less vocal since the Epstein case. In a philosophical sense – the paradigm of thought that doesn’t fit a rigid interpretation has no long-standing fixture (not permanent), as it shows through history; paradigms of thought and even myth are fluctuating concepts or transience.

We develop states of consciousness by understanding the best way we can about consciousness itself, and we will then have a clearer understanding of evolution. What is consciousness …if it’s not energy and not matter? Matter, substance, and all objects are concepts that arise in consciousness. These are things we conceptualise (we created) within the matrix of our consciousness; we think matter, and we think energy. Energy itself is a difficult concept to pin down; the fact is that these are concepts that arose from consciousness; it is the primary source of reality, and it is the fundamental aspect of existence. It is the one thing that was never born and is the one thing that never dies, and essentially the fundamental element of everything. Of course, explaining consciousness as an absolute is impossible; it’s like trying to look at your eyes without a mirror [the seen and not seen as it were]. We can, however, determine through excitation and experience of consciousness to that of reality because reality is experience. Consciousness is that which thinks, observes, speculates, creates models, and generates explanations, and by modelling patterns and regularities through experience, it can be determined within the laws of nature and laws of psychology, which are similar aspects of the Jungian archetype.

Any notion of idealism that consciousness reflects a process of evolution is unattainable because there is evidence to conclude that the universe formed before consciousness life arose. It is to assume consciousness arises out of biology and is therefore circumscribed by biology, so before biology arose, there was no consciousness; therefore, evidence of the universe existing before biology denies idealism and reinforces a secular argument by assuming materialism for the argument. When, in actuality, life is the localisation of consciousness, it’s a disassociation of consciousness; living beings are a disassociation alters, alter egos of the one mind behind all reality. Consciousness does not need to depend on biology for it to exist; biology is just certain images in the processes of consciousness.

There was a social movement in the late 1700s and early 1800s, a movement of liberation from the controlling system of religion, which focused on superstition as the focus of its control over the people. At the same time, the industrial era was present, with the combination of the two people turning to science to explain the truth. Constricting consciousness has led to many systems being categorised into a box labelled “mysticism/superstition.” This classification unfairly places fundamental concepts like consciousness, intuition, human connection, and paranormal phenomena within the realm of superstition. Doing so creates the assumption that empirical data and evidence are the sole foundations of proper thinking. Secular groups support such reasoning in this fallacy to uphold materialism.

Reinforcing the false assumption that consciousness is just part of the brain, even though they have no idea how it works. Even more frustrating is that the scientific process, especially in Noetics and the works of biologist Rupert Sheldrake, has proven that mass consciousness exists and is separate from the brain. Still, people seem to disregard this because to do so would be taboo, as well as one’s reputation and other scientific factors.

At least three concurrent processes are working in nature that humanity is subject to and participates in physically, mentally, and spiritually. Current evolution theories need to explain the higher faculties of the human being, such as self-consciousness, intuition, and inspiration. Esoteric philosophy has value to offer here; for instance, the sacred language of consciousness can be equated to the sacred geometry of life.

Consciousness moves through different states of being, constantly moving closer and closer to divinity to phi; every time consciousness moves towards a different stage, a rapid biological change occurs, changing into something new (ancient Egyptians called this resurrection). We are in the process of conscious spiritual evolution, and within those biological changes that follow, there is evidence that modern science has evaluated concerning DNA. A child was found to have three DNA strands rather than two, going from a double helix to a triple helix; this is not relatively new …the study has been around for two decades or so.

There was also a convention in New Mexico around the early 2000s, and the main topic of that day was genetic mutation; science acknowledges that we are changing, but with all the rhetoric aside, the result of such genetic changes is unknowable. From what hidden history tells us and also through sacred geometry, we can determine that humans once had 12 strains of DNA activated, but due to some event, ten have been turned off, which we call junk DNA. 97% of our DNA is unused, leaving us with 3% active. Still, those junk DNA are slowly being activated, going from two to three, and by imagining the possibility of getting back to 12 strands of DNA being activated (a crystalline being as opposed to carbon-based) that coincides with the 12 Chakras, the possibilities are limitless. The Bible mentions the coming of Christ, which happens to be the name of the third level of consciousness called Christ-consciousness; we are moving to Christ-consciousness, and some people are already there. We are moving to the level of understanding that Jesus had, which is the Christos to the human species.

Epigenetics and the Environment: The study of cloning stem cells opened up a lot of debate surrounding ‘genes.’ Those genes that control life, ‘genetic determinism,’ have been uprooted when considering the environment. When exposed to different environments, a test on the same genetic material produced different results. This means that genes don’t control life, but the cells’ fate depends on the environment.

New science delves into epigenetic control based on genetic control (control by genes). In this model … it’s essentially a victimization philosophy. This means you’re not responsible for your genes; you become victimized by your heredity. The new science of epigenetic control, which is about control above the genes – determines in response to your environment – as you change and respond to your environment, you change the fate of your cells. This gives you the choice to master your perceptions and, therefore, your perceptions and responses to your genes.       

This is fascinating because it is like biology’s version of the observer effect (and its waveforms) or magic’s language-based world that can engage with us. All of these are modes to answer the prevailing eschatological end-time scenario. In this model, however, the contention lies in misperceptions; if our misperceptions are wrong, like our simulated social structure, they can be detrimental to our health. This means there is nothing wrong with your biology, but our misperception of it causes brain signals to produce undesired outcomes that manifest physically. What are those misperceptions that relate to this topic?

Contention	The belief that ‘matter’ is all that matters (Newtonian / materialism)
Response	Quantum physics says; it’s not the physical matter that is most important, it’s the invisible stuff; fields, energies that shape matter – as the same way magnets shape iron filings. Which the mind plays a factor in. which shapes the world depending on what we believe.
Contention	The belief that genes control our lives.
Response	A disease in the body causes irresponsibility, if it can’t be controlled ‘genes’ why should people care. It’s not the genes, but the mind that controls hereditary.
Contention	The world is based on the struggle for survival (Darwinian model).
Response	Evolution is based on a corporation, a balance, as opposed to a struggle.

.

The Dialectical Timeline Discrepancy: Christians were unable to counter the emerging scientific findings (alleged evidence) that challenged the Bible-based view of creation. Dialecticism arises between a rigidly materialistic science, which tells us that the earth is billions of years old, and Christian theology, which insists the world was created 6000 years ago.

Darwin’s method (theory) makes us a chance creation with no divine intervention, an accident that relies on extremely long events. What they do when they have a theory they can’t prove is extended periods (distances) in a way that makes it difficult for you to comprehend in your mind (millions and billions of years). While introducing secular arguments that are impossible to argue against, for instance, the notion that an infinite number of monkeys in an infinite number of typewriters will eventually write Shakespeare’s plays. You will notice that they have mentioned that humans are just intelligent apes; being just animals, we can be ruled over, which is what it’s all about). All this is weaved around the Darwinian myth alongside cosmic, chemical, stellar, organic and macro; all centred on evolution that propagates this falsity.

Geological Conundrums: There was dialectical debate over Radiohalos or pleochroic halos, and they are evidence to conclude that Earth is indeed 6000 years old, as stated in Genesis. These halos are spherical shells of discolouration within minerals such as biotite that occur in granite and other igneous rocks. Including minute radioactive crystals (zircon, apatite, or titanite) within the host crystal structure results in circular shells (zones of radiation damage). This gave them enough to conclude that rocks didn’t form from molten but by creation, with more tests concerning halos of Po-218 to that of U-238, that these polonium inclusions decayed with a half-life of three minutes, reaffirming this notion.

Geological Conundrums: There was dialectical debate over Radiohalos or pleochroic halos, and they are evidence to conclude that Earth is indeed 6000 years old, as stated in Genesis. These halos are spherical shells of discolouration within minerals such as biotite that occur in granite and other igneous rocks. Including minute radioactive crystals (zircon, apatite, or titanite) within the host crystal structure results in circular shells (zones of radiation damage). This gave them enough to conclude that rocks didn’t form from molten but by creation, with more tests concerning halos of Po-218 to that of U-238, that these polonium inclusions decayed with a half-life of three minutes, reaffirming this notion.

The opposing view is that discolouration alpha particles emitted by the nuclei cause discolouration; the radiuses of the concentric shells are proportional to the particle’s energy (Henderson & Bateson, 1934). [Critics of Gentry, including Thomas A. Bailieu (Baillieul, 2005) and John Brawley (Brawley, 1992), have pointed out that Po-218 is a decay product of radon, which as a gas can be given off by a grain of uranium in one part of the rock and migrate to another part of the rock to form a uraniumless halo. Many radon atoms are caught or absorbed at a particular point. This phenomenon has not yet been observed experimentally but is supported by Gentry’s “polonium halos”, found along microscope cracks in rocks containing uranium halos (Wakefield, 1998). (Wikipedia)]

Fundamentalists often rush to support claims that lack solid evidence. For example, there was an incident in which they asserted that a specific Buddhist text states that the supreme enlightened one will prophesy a saviour 500 years after his passing. They further claimed that overcoming sin is akin to wiping a marble clean, where the time taken to wipe it determines that time and practice have no bearing on the redemption of sin. This alleged text was copied and displayed on a Fundamentalist Christian website. However, it was refuted by Buddhist monks and historians. This raises the question: Why would Fundamentalist Christian groups misrepresent themselves in this way? The answer may lie in their emphasis on “faith over spirituality” rather than “faith and spirituality.” This significant fallacy is often present in Kent Hovind’s teachings, notably lacking any references to consciousness.

[Back to the subject] Iron meteorites consist of iron, nickel, and alloy; 95 per cent contain iron-nickel metal, which means the metal is mostly iron but contains 4 or 30 per cent nickel, as well as a few tenths of a per cent of cobalt. Nickel is a metal rare on Earth, and it displays a unique feature that is never found in ordinary terrestrial material, which gives it an otherworldly perspective; mainstream science claims it is found on Earth. Possible hoaxes invented by mainstream geologists to misinform society of a grand designer, meteorites suggest a hyperreal space. Therefore, the notion of fragments of something otherworldly has merit, but not in the hyperreal sense, but in a flat and transfixed kind. Moreover, it could be a longer time frame for our Earth’s existence.

Epistemology Revisions: The false fact that we live in a physical universe governed by immutable laws is highly questionable; scientists have figured out that the speed of light is not constant; it changes and is in a state of flux. The notion of immutability disregards the quantum model, also consciousness being the crown of all beings, and the holographic reality. Instead, it reaffirms rigid interpretation, and science is the authority. In the previous essay, “The Only Way Out is In”, I mentioned that scientism is a form of magic; what is missing from that statement is that they are run by elite groups who practice that magic. Scientists under the thumb of agents practising magic, but not ordinary magic as nature-loving neo-pagans would have it, but magic(k) for gain, power and control. That has sinister connotations towards the four tenets of Satanism. ‘Satanism’ is understood as moving against God and not its early mythical etymology.  

					1.	The worship of the Ego (or self)
					2.	Moral Relativity (situational ethics),
					3.	Social Darwinism (survival of the fittest)
					4.	Eugenics (I decide who lives or dies)

.

Basic Darwinism is the survival of the fittest in a social context; only the species can get the most resources and fight. Genetic homeostasis is a scientific fact that can mutate and breed a species to the point that it becomes sterile or goes back to its original shape, but it can go outside those parameters; to make evolution a fact is to break homeostasis, which is undoable. The elite class needs Darwinism in order for social Darwinism to occur, so the guy who can manoeuvre around business is the guy who can make his way. The survival of the ruthless (corporatism) allows psychopathy to rule the world, and they need Darwinism as a model for social Darwinism as an implementation.

Basic Darwinism is the survival of the fittest in a social context; only the species can get the most resources and fight. Genetic homeostasis is a scientific fact that can mutate and breed a species to the point that it becomes sterile or goes back to its original shape, but it can go outside those parameters; to make evolution a fact is to break homeostasis, which is undoable. The elite class needs Darwinism in order for social Darwinism to occur, so the guy who can manoeuvre around business is the guy who can make his way. The survival of the ruthless (corporatism) allows psychopathy to rule the world, and they need Darwinism as a model for social Darwinism as an implementation.

New Age and the Accelerating Evolution: The sacred Geometry, the language of consciousness that employs the spiritual evolutional change from second to third levels of consciousness, coincides with the many dimensions of the New Age. The New Age holds much of its existence to the conventional current thought, especially with the human potential movement, which centres on personal transformation, which is that individuals can accelerate the evolution of humanity. This idea is removed from the Darwinian notion of natural selection, which states that an individual can do nothing to further the development of a species; one gene will prove advantageous to survival.

There is also a link between emotion and genetics; a researcher […] put photons in a scattered vacuum, and a DNA sample was inserted. They measured the photons and found them aligned with the axis of the DNA. Then, as they removed the DNA, it remained present, also known as the phantom DNA experiment. Science has bridged the gap between the physical and ethereal (or spiritual), and our emotions affect our DNA, which directly shapes the physical world we experience every day. Which mirrored the change in the heavy bodies; astrological motions serve as a clock to map changes and transitions, which reflects the changes in existence (as above, so below).

Evolution concerning the human potential movement bears more resemblance to French naturalist Jean-Baptise de Lamarck (1744-1829), who preceded Darwin by half a century. Unlike Darwin, Lamarck believed acquired characteristics can be transmitted to one’s progeny. Creative evolution is intriguing (whether you believe it or not), and it embraces the progress of the species more actively than a mere sac of genes. It was further elaborated by Friedrich Nietzsche ‘Overman’ or ‘Superman’ he wrote:

I teach you the overman. Man is something that shall be overcome. What have you done to overcome him? All beings so far have created something beyond themselves; and do you want to be the ebb of this great flood and even go back to the beasts rather than overcome man? What is the ape to man? A laughingstock or a painful embarrassment, and man shall be just that for the overman. (Nietzsche, F, Thus Spake Zarathustra n.d)

.

So this implies a distinguishing aspect of man and Superman, but man can enhance himself to be closer to Superman; Michael Murphy, co-founder of Esalen, states: “Meta-normal capacities…seem to develop best in conjunction with love for other living things.” He lays out the importance of love, and that love transcends and reveals fundamental unity with others. He also outlines that this new evolutionary domain is both spontaneous and transformative practice and is not limited to exceptional feats of physical prowess or paranormal abilities but includes transcendent empathy and altruism.

Alien Intervention Moment: There is a place in Africa called the Adams calendar where an unsupported truism is mentioned—not the place but the myth. It is assumed that a group of beings named Anunnaki artificially genetically created the Adamu, the human species that has links to Egypt.

The research that supports Zecharia Sitchin’s Annunaki concept of history needs to be more consistent with Gnostic and Genesis teaching. The notion of Adamski was developed to conjure enslaved people to mine monatomic gold by taking out part of the rib of the Adamski to manipulate the DNA, then implanting it in a woman for the woman to give birth to a genetically modified human. It is a retelling; according to Arcanum’s teaching, such a similar event occurred, and Sitchin possibly incorporated parts of those teachings into his myth (agenda). Some scholars claim Annunaki and Elohim are the same beings of people. Backed by numerology, Elohim = 31, Adam’s Calendar (Zimbabwe) is 31 degrees East longitude of the Great Pyramid, although I need to find out how much truth that is in a flat Earth model.

According to esoteric wisdom teachings Gods were androgynous, Shiva – Ardhanareshvara, and the Aztec God – Ometecuhtli. In the beginning, God created Elohim (meaning male/female, gods/goddesses); Elohim means the governors of creation, who were both male and female and were also known as angels. Genesis 2:7 states: “Jehovah Elohim formed man from the dust of the earth. He blew the breath of life into his nostrils, and man became a living being.” In Genesis 1:27, “God created man in his own image; in the image of Elohim created he them: male and female created he them.”   In Genesis 2:8, “Jehovah Elohim planted a garden in Eden, in the east, and placed there the man he had formed.” This man is what we know as Adam, along with the Garden of Eden existed in the 4th dimension. According to Esoteric teachings, seven fundamental dimensions exist: 1-2-3, 4-5-6-7/0 (illustrated in the Tree of Life symbol); angels traverse these realms and are represented as Jacob’s Ladder. 4th dimensions that exist as vital energy in Hebrew is known as the Yesod. Humans (Adam) needed to grow spiritually. And so Jehovah Elohim took the hermaphrodite man’s rib then closed up the flesh, then Jehovah made a woman from the rib he took out of the hermaphrodite man. Then, Jehovah said, “She will be called woman,” and since that time, man and woman have existed, seeking each other’s anima and animus.

.

So, within this narrative, it is easy to formulate that Sitchin took the notion of Angels and swapped it with Aliens/Archons, which brings his notion into question. Angels were clearly in some human form originally. DNA evidence could link human ancestors to common ancestors. So, one can conclude from apocryphal texts that those ancestors are from Adam and Eve and Kane (this is a heavy subject and is for another thesis). In Gnostic groups, ‘Jehovah’ is something of a bad word; it is believed that Jehovah does not want a man to be a reflection of him, the creator, and not a reflection of the Supreme God.

The Theosophical Option (for consideration purpose only): Blavatsky gave a third option in her Secret Doctrine (1988); she claims Earth is millions of years old and one of the countless universes ceaselessly out of the Absolute. The Secret Doctrine has an extended commentary on a cryptic text called The Stanzas of Dzyan. Some Scholars suggest that this work forms part of the Kanjur, the immense cannon of Tibetan Buddhist scripture, although sceptics follow such claims.

The doctrine suggests “the Eternity of the Universe in toto as boundless plane… ‘the playground of numberless Universes incessantly manifesting and disappearing’” (Blavatsky, 1988). [The book teaches that behind the generation of numberless worlds lies the Absolute, “an Omnipresent, Eternal, Boundless, and Immutable Principle,” which manifests in dual form, as “spirit” and “Matter”; the interplay of these two forces causes all things to be. (Hidden Wisdom, Smoley, R. Kinney, J 2006)]

[Furthermore, all souls are fundamentally one with a cosmic Oversaul, which is itself, but an aspect of the Absolute; hence, the “Esoteric philosophy admits no privileges or special gifts in man, save those won by his Ego through personal effort and merit throughout a long series of … reincarnations.” (Hidden Wisdom, Smoley, R. Kinney, J 2006)]

This alludes to the central idea of Theosophy: the doctrine of involution and evolution. A far more comprehensive teaching than the Darwinian method, Theosophy ascribes to the progressive development of everything, including atoms. All existence is taking part in an enormous cycle of the descent of Spirit into Matter and its eventual return to the bosom of the Absolute. Evolution is not a blind or mechanical process but is guided by conscious forces, personified as the seven Dhyan-Chohans, “Cosmic Gods”, who rule over nature.

[The Secret Doctrine teaches evolution although differentiated by the concept of seven root races, of which ours is the fifth. The first race, known as “the lords of the moon,” had only begun the descent into the matter; they did not have solid matter (Blavatsky jokingly describes them as “pudding-bags”); the second race is the Hyperboreans, named after the country in ancient Greek myth located beyond the North Pole. The third race was the Lemurians; the fourth was the race of Atlantis; the fifth was ours, the Aryans (not a particular ethnic group, but a particular human race that began a million years ago). We are the race firmly embedded in materiality, and we will be followed by two more Root Races, who will again become less material and more spiritual in substance. Eventually, we will reach Dhyan-Chohans. In the Secret Doctrine, there is a subtle dynamic between collective and individual evolution; throughout the gestation of universe cycles of races, each being, indeed each atom, is given to attain cosmic consciousness. Evolution takes place through karma, as played out in reincarnation. Although these two concepts have become deeply embedded in the popular mind, they must be clarified. (Hidden Wisdom, Smoley, R. Kinney, J 2006)]

Conclusion: The Darwinian evolutional method that changed the paradigm of human perception acts as an absolute authority, which may seem progressive, but in actuality, it is backward. Anyone who follows such a notion is misled. Moreover, for the most part, this is everyone because of the indoctrination of such theories to young children in our school systems. The result of such misleading intellectualism forms an excuse or myopic viewpoint that does not get challenged. Intelligent design questions the dialectical contention towards the Darwinian evolution method. The truth is … to the surprise of the majority collective whole, it tends to lean towards intelligent design and, therefore, also creationism, but it must include evolution’s micro-evolution variations as it explains an aspect of consciousness mutation changes; anything beyond micro-evolution is dogma, such as cosmic, chemical, stellar, organic and macro-evolutions.

Evolution is the movement from within to manifest certain “inborn” principles; the idea that a DNA molecule’s existence is formed through chance is wildly refuted by esoteric philosophy. There are ordering factors in the development of a cell; scientists (outsiders to scientism) have formulated through their calculations the formation of a molecule through mechanical and molecular forces and are astronomically small, let alone the formation of a cell. Biologists will realise there are deeper organisational forces of life at work beyond what they understand now, for instance, the biogenic radiation coming from a cell when it divides. Aside from the current scientific idea about evolution, there are more levels to evolution, and separate lines of evolution are coming together into the human being.

There is, however, a place for natural selection in esoteric philosophy (or teachings), the correct parts of Darwinism, like the ‘principles of natural selection,’ but the transformations of forms as a Darwinist theory is not a fact in nature. It is a ‘theory in transformation’ (more explanation can be found in Purucker, G. ‘Man in Evolution’). Reductionists, including Darwinists, fail to acknowledge subtle factors at work in the human race and in this world, many have shortcomings. Stephen Meyer’s book Darwin’s Doubt outlines Biological and Paleontological evidence that can convey the failure of Darwin’s approach. A respectable Dutch magazine reported that Palaeontologists discovered fossils in the layers of the earth that contradicted mainstream evolution theories. Instead of showcasing such findings to the world, they abandoned their excavation and kept silent about their discovery; one must wonder how many other findings are found and kept away from the public.

Nikola Tesla once stated, “The day science begins the study of non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than all the centuries that have come before.” Science should not confine its potential to preconceived theories but should remain open-minded. This idea is explored by asking, “How does consciousness affect biology?”—not just biology, but various other factors.

.

.

Occultism and Post-awakening Natures:

.

.

---

.

Dancing in the Sliding Scales of Ideals [Posted initially on 23rd May 2021]: Refers to the natural processes of our amorphic cultural descent – It’s a dance because as much as we know what is going on, we can’t dismiss the fact that there is this other ‘thing’ attached to the effect of those movements. Take, for instance, the very unrestrained and politically correct [woke-isim] barrage on the entertainment industry, notably on writers and directors who must balance their artistic integrity against an agenda. An agenda is run by a group that thinks they know what ethically correct ideals are. And we know ethics without debate is ethically unsound, and we know there is confusion towards ethics with morality. However, most of the social issues being brought up by woke-is still need to be addressed with some restraint; otherwise, it’s a recipe for disaster. 

Ethics doesn’t pay; for example, social security’s socialist model is always tunnelled through a managerial no-win situation. Following the rule in bureaucratic ethical policy, not setting yourself up for fraud imposes the other for disclosure of personal information. When denied, it’s cancelled [meaning you don’t get paid]. The ever-prevailing maritime law juxtaposed with natural law, the latter chooses to see the value in people, not as an individual of the land but as a corporation and authority built upon people’s consent. It relies on ignorance and false memory files to impose fake referents of the word. By defining man as a person, a person is a corporation, and man is not. This system doesn’t benefit the individual; liabilities are disguised as benefits. 

Recognising ethics as a serious matter is appropriate around any subject that implores debate, such as the death penalty and feeding the poor. Socialists often use ethics as their talking point, but ethics usually doesn’t pay because it’s not utilitarian. Ethics doesn’t pay in so much as you’re dammed if you do; dammed if you don’t. It parallels entertainment groups with a lot to lose and is then brought down, knowing that if groups go woke, they’ll go broke, or if they don’t, they’ll still go broke. Both are a gamble, but one has a chance of a sure thing, while the other is doomed from the get-go.   

Woke-isim acts on Strindberg’s quote, “Kindly control your imagination …That is what makes men beasts” – although they’re not identifying the fear of uncertainty. They are, instead, controllers of your imaginations, a politically (in)correct meme virus with an agenda. The assumption is that creativity can be bottled and manufactured like a factory process line. We first had glimpses of this when rationalists or scientifically minded worldviews were introduced to creativity as an approach to that creative process. And we know it’s not science because science is pedantic; this is quasi-science [science-fiction] – the fictional aspect acts as a small window for the imagination inside an infinitely vast universe, but we know that the vast universe is just the backdrop for the imagination.

And we know there is a version of science outside science fiction, but it is still science fiction or scientism. This is where the new atheists and rationalists established their religion, but it’s failing, and I believe this was due to the flat-earth movement infamously having had an impact. This version of scepticism, which is unhealthy, had morphed into the woke-movement groups. Given how sceptics and Atheists have been recruiting geeks to their cause, it gave the first clue to creativity being hijacked by the imposition of identity politics. This seems essential in the media realm, but outside of it’s just something to laugh about or laugh away.

There is an argument suggesting mixing science with mysticism is a bad idea, but perhaps this mutual exclusivity can only be definitive in a way that matches the notion of anti-oneness proposition – given it’s a fact outside sensory perceptions are being given to us. Science’s mysticism aspect is Scientism because they’ve taken the icons of gods and reduced them to a satellite cosmos with all the made-up laws they’ve adopted. A more accurate distinction is perhaps not mixing science that requires tests, evaluations and results with mysticism but mysticism that is more in tune with superstition.

A rock may not have spirit as an animist might view it, but it may have vibrational frequencies that keep it static and impenetrable. At the same time, Niels Bohr declared: “There is no quantum world; there is only a quantum description.” How does one acquire memory files or states of consciousness for the quantum world? We can only give theoretical qualities [referent]. It’s asking for faith, which is religious.

Spiritual science conveys liberal subjects, such as literature, music, etc., as physical science. Then, spiritual materialism came about to identify that there is an all-pervading spirit underlining various forms of phenomena. It’s the categorisation of where the identity of the spirit or psyche functions instead of mere brain functions like spiritual materialism.

When science fiction or pseudo-science (often called scientism) goes beyond narrative entertainment, it can become a form of manipulation. Actual science can be seen as visionary and mystical art, much like the contributions of Newton and Tesla. They have illuminated concepts such as the electromagnetic field surrounding us, reinforced by the ley lines notably found in the pyramids of Egypt. This process has become an idolatry symbol for the imposition of pseudo-scientific principles in real life, like the innumerable concepts of satellization. At the same time, in this weird paradox, satellization acts the same way as myth-makers, but narrow in its imagination, but infinite in its backdrop [the endless universe]. From the likes of Kaku, who identified that string theory mirrors the concepts of Zohar and Kabbala, Maybe so. Still, the result is always reductionist as the mysteries gave it more personality.  

What is missing is Jung’s concept of psycho-spiritual-transformations, what he calls [possibly incorrect spelling: ‘enantiodromia’ process], which has similarity with the spiritual-awakening-process, which nobody knows what to do with when it strikes. It’s about being aware that creativity is the result of what is around and inside us and how it penetrates the human essence, resulting in awareness that man is the creator of spirit and that he possesses it. And so this brings us to those with great imaginings, what Schopenhauer describes as the one: ‘who is endowed with imagination as able, as it were, to call up spirits’ These are the artist-prophets that sit at the highest mountain, whose contributions had an impact on culture and society. Schopenhauer also concluded that exact quote that can best describe the dichotomy I’m talking about: ‘Therefore the man without imagination is related to him, as the mussel fastened to its rock’ the producer by numbers, the committee and now with woke-isim is the man without imagination and is there waiting for those with great imaginings to come down from their mountain. 

Woke-isim may have grown out of sceptics and new-Atheism, given that its process of thinking is similar, so one can conclude that this is indeed the case. Although woke-isim acts more like a decompiling virus, I believe the notion of identity politics originated in Christian theology with a focus on eschatology, the idea that ‘the marginalised will triumph at the end and the kingdom of heaven.’ Woke’s new label as Puritan can only support that claim. The contention argument, or perhaps the elite’s, recognised that and concluded there was no way it would happen, so they employed these woke-puritans to even it out. The theory that it may originate from a far-right totalitarian group is evident in their tendency to downplay a radical racial movement. 

Woke’s ideological simplicity and Fundamentalism’s ideological absolutes and absolutism are both recipes for disaster. Still, only one seems to be a permanent constant because it attaches itself to a timeless myth. You could argue that absolute ideology came to light due to how biblical literature is parsed, but that would assume that Christians can’t distinguish what the Holy Book said at that time from how people live their lives now. Given what memory is and how memory acts, there must be a benefit of the doubt.

Evangelicalism, outside conspiracy theories or political agendas, is similar to traditional Christians. Attempt to manage the creative-imaginative process through Evangelical filters. This means a Christianized imitation of some secular genre or style. Christian sports stories, Christian detective stories, Christian sex manuals, Christian heavy metal, and Christian self-help books – it’s all second-hand recycling of old mainstream ideals. These are all pretty much stale in comparison – this is due to how linear Evangelicalism is when it communicates – with the immense pressure to conform to authority, it destroys the creative process. This is insidious, but it’s within its bubble where creativity is stifled as managed creativity starts at the roots. Meanwhile, woke is parasitic and attaches to creative ideas that have already been fully realised, which is far-reaching. Evangelicalism wants this but doesn’t have this kind of reach, and it only reinforces my speculation.

Their linear perspective doesn’t allow a means for better communication. The need to conform and submit to authority is a habit that diminishes any creativity an Evangelical might have. The outcome will always be derivative. There is a habit of discouraging individual thought, ironically promoting individuality as a staple of right politics. However, outside of Evangelicalism and conspiracy theory, the same sorts of debasement happen even amongst creatives outside the shackles of biblical authority, but adhere instead to a corporation, and in some ways, can be a modern marginalization of the imagination.

If woke-isim is indeed an offshoot of (atheism) scepticism, reductionism, and rationalism, where does that leave intuition and imagination? It’s as oppressive as the Evangelical filters. It points to the notion that secularism can lead to nihilism. In the last post, we discussed the process of Vitvan’s general semantics, which is about images and feelings appearing as substantive, heading towards synthesis rather than oneness. This makes woke-isim a repellent to general semantics because woke is a process in reductionism that doesn’t grasp complete synthesis.   

As opposed to being woke, the awakening realises that they have awakened to a simulated world and, to go deeper, a holographic world. This event creates many existential dilemmas about reality. The film I Heart Huckabees is about a group that hires existential detectives to solve their existential problems. Albert hires them to solve his coincidences, whether they are insignificant or meaningful. 

Albert’s ark goes from being superficial to nihilism to self-actualization. His coincidences [represented in an African door-man] would lead him into a Christian home where the Sudanese man lives as a home-stay. This is the film’s subtle way of showing his self-actualization would lead him to Christianity. Given how Christianity [perhaps not faith itself] in some ways can be secular … and in light of awakening to a world that is simulated and driven by reductionism. His self-actualization, his synthesis leading into oneness … is that his coincidences lead him into spirituality. There is also something to be said about existential detectives that can be surmised more profoundly as of-shoots of synchronistic mystics. 

Earth-Image and Evolution-idolatry Cyphered through General Semantics: Christian fundamentalism is also an off-shoot of those ‘men without imagination’. The theist sects implore or even support the satellization cosmos as well as the wrong aspects of evolution. In the last post where, we outline Vitvan’s general semantics about restraining from using words/images with no proper referent has been established.  And it would be from traditional Christian fundamentalist Kent Hovind that took this process or tool [unknowingly] and recognized that the images that were used to convey many of (Darwin’s) evolution fallacy.              

The tool for this awareness [Vitvan’s Semantics] can usually be challenged by groups with an agenda who are aware by giving false references, which means they can establish a false absolute. Evolution and its notable subject, natural selection, turned out to be … in one particular sense, not the cause of evolution but ensures the bad ones don’t survive. However, it won’t change into something else entirely, and a more definitive word to use is variation. Embryo development identifies gills in the embryo cells; this is incorrect. They are the proto-growth for the ears and throat and have nothing to do with breathing. Haeckel illustrated these fake drawings in 1874; however, Haeckel’s assumptions are wrong and proven as such as actual photos became evident, although his drawings were still used in educational textbooks until the latter part of 1999 (not sure of the present time). 

Hackel’s attempt at a false-to-fact abstraction coincides with the hyperreal space’s attempt to create a fake universe map when the map is not the territory. Akin to Baudrillard’s fable, only in his view, is the map, the simulacrum that has meaning but, as a model, loses all reference to reality. Hackel’s fake image (illustrations) is not the label, the reference, or the referent. And it’s an attempt to be all of those through hyperrealism, through the simulated.

A simulated hyperreal space where Earth’s image blends various data sets from multiple instruments into one picture, and a notable person in charge of this is (NASA’s) Rob Simmons. He says, “It is photo-shopped …but it has to be,” and so this is where one set of suspicions lies, hoaxes (moon landings and space travels) act as a simultaneous ‘false and real’ referent or reference when all they have is the false Label. This leaves us with a hyperreal-space notion. Space shuttles and rocket take-offs are accurate to a point they are not; our inability to pass a certain point is halted by something unimaginable to human understanding.

Scientists don’t know where all matters come from, where the laws came from, where the energy came from. Also, the notion that is the conservation of angular momentum (if the universe began in a swirling dot), why do two planets spin backward? (Venus, Uranus, and possibly Pluto rotate backward from other planets). Six of the 63 moons rotate backward: Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune. Intelligent people have concluded that scientism (not science itself) is a religion because it asks for you to believe. So, the same can be said for the majority of what Evolution advocates. The dialectical argument of believing God created heaven and earth 6000 thousand years ago to that of life stemming from a rock or a pool 4.6 billion years ago. The many assumptions of different species having common ancestors are thereby differentiated by the many original species it has in common. This is another example of a secular argument assuming materialism for the argument that the many different species of birds that Darwin found in the Galapagos Islands have a common ancestor, and that ancestor is still the Bird. The many species of birds cannot be equated (or related) to something different entirely, and they are just mere variations.

The fallacy of fossils is that such evidence cannot determine related species and that all the ancestors are, therefore, determined by bones, and within that inclusion of false to-fact reference that certain animals back then could do something that animals of today can’t. Steven Gaul states, “The absence of fossil evidence for any immediate stages is a persistent and nagging problem for evolution” They can look for the missing links as long as they wish, but how do you find something that doesn’t exist?

The fallacy of carbon dating ascribes to assumptions, and so, therefore, is unreliable, using Kent Hovind’s analogy of a burning candle; if someone were to come across a burning candle and another person asks, ‘When was the candle lit? It’s undetermined, as the candle was burning before he got there. Through empirical science, the candle’s height and rate of burn of one inch per hour are determined by the burn rate, but the fire in which it was lit is still being determined unless you are willing to make assumptions. So, you can determine the amount […] this can be measured and the decay rate, but that is all. How much […] was in it at death and whether or not the decay rate has been constant are not provable. Samples of known-age Radioisotope dating don’t work, while samples of unknown-age Radioisotope dating are assumed to work.

Iconoclasm; Cyphered through General Semantics: When talking about intent and symbolism [images], it becomes a grey area because the symbols become their own stories once it’s in motion. Symbols are part of a program on several levels, in our conscious and unconscious minds, DNA, and culture. Sure, a designer might be exploring with symbolism or has an allegory to tell, but it’s all very nebulous. You can try to be methodical, but more often than not, it’s a recycling of an image. There is only one way to draw a square, triangle, and circle. Then, there is the aspect where the symbolism creeps in because the artist is playing with themes and finds himself being pulled under. Symbols start to tell their own stories; the symbols activate the part of the brain you didn’t even know was being activated.

A symbol taking on its form and stories can be hijacked if its true intent has been dormant for millennia, like the Swastika symbol. This is a heresy [reject the image’s meaning, but keeps the image] for another label to define a false referent. The Swastika was adopted and inverted to corrupt its symbolic meaning, and the term ‘Aryan’ has a sinister history since the Nazis used it for their idea of the ‘chosen’ people being the German race. The original term ‘Aryan’ is mentioned in the Indian sacred books, the Vedas. ‘Aryan’ alludes to the wise men, the rishis or seers of northern India. It was later redefined by the Orientalists who have made ‘Aryans’ of all Europeans. The Nazi writers then adopted the word and redefined it to mean the German race. Extreme right-wing groups have also been found to use the term “Aryan race” to mean the white race; the national alliance, a right-wing group, adopted the term ‘natural order’ to convey their idea of the position of the white race.  

This confusion of meaning arises in people’s minds and thoughts, and they need to realise what Blavatsky’s definition of such a notion means: ‘type of consciousness, ‘principle of consciousness to be developed’, etc., and not that of skin colour. Indians view this connotation as something to be admired as it is part of their Vedic terminology, as opposed to the racist one. The corruption of this symbolic meaning has been finger-pointed to theosophy; however, it was Jorg Lanzvon Liebenfels, who is a Nazi writer to a large extent, responsible for this denigration of ancient symbols and scriptures. He is responsible for developing the movement of ariosophy, a debased version of theosophy. They’re responsible for the debased version of Friedrich Nietzsche’s term “Ubermensch”

The first capital city of Sumerians was called ‘Ur’ by the Chaldeans. The surrounding area also encompassed Akkadian, Babylonian, and Assyrian at around 4000 B.C. Sumerians was an important city that spread the basis of many global technologies. An example is the written language, which took the form of iconographic writing [cuneiform] – notice the words icon and graphic coming out of ‘iconographic,’ a series of lines creating pictographs. Then, it was replaced by the Phoenician alphabet [some icons have similarities with the English alphabet] near the neo-Syrian empire.     

In the Fertile Crescent [cradle of civilisations spanning Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Jordan, and Egypt] in the Neolithic times arose humanity’s early form of religion. Mesopotamia [Iraq] is the land between two rivers, Euphrates and Tigris; those two rivers meet together to the south near Basra, called the city Gurney. In this place, there was a Garden of Eden and a Tree of Worship; the Tree was called Adam-Tree. In light of the flat earth and one’s intuitive component, the Garden of Eden and Tree representation are symbolic alters for the sacred centre.

As we know, the Phoenician people [sea-people] were remnants of Atlantis civilisations, and the location of the city of Atlantis has been debated. Still, I believe it to be the once fertile area, the concentric island located in the North. The Atlantians (or Phaeacians) worshipped their central pillar, which has cosmological value to the Polaris Star [tail end of little bear constellation] in conjunction with Ursa Major [great-bear], which makes a swastika symbol. This symbol depicts the four seasons that rotate or move around the Polaris Star [North Star] instead of the Earth moving around it. This symbol is a cross with horizontal lines at each point, symbolising the rotations of the stars and constellations (aside from a few static). Without those horizontal lines, it is essentially a cross, a symbol to mark the spot, such as the centre, pillar, tree, etc. The Phoenicians used that symbol for a thousand years, which the Templars would later adopt.        

A sculpture of a king depicting Shamash in the British Museum depicts him wearing a cross necklace that predates Christianity. The statue was erected in the capital city of Kalua (modern Nimrud) by the Assyrian king Shashi-Adad V (reigned 824-811 BC). The king wears a prominent Maltese on his chest as an alternative symbol of Shamash, the god of the sun and justice. The cross is also known as the croix pattée alésée arrondie, and would later be co-opted by the Knights Templar, primarily in the stone carvings. The adoption of this cross is identified with the Sun god eight centuries before Christ by the Templars; the Templars themselves are possibly a branch of solar cults such as Shemsu Hor (followers of Horus). This certainly puts into conflict the argument that Christianity and Solarism are contiguous systems separated only by politics.    

In the Stauros, it is defined as an upright stake; what the Zionists added was [hence a cross (the Rom instrument of crucifixion)], which was not originally there. The cross was used in ancient Pagan religion, notably Egyptian religion, as a symbol of good fortune and luck. Other cultures, such as the Babylonian, Persian, Indian, and so forth, also used the cross symbol; the symbol itself is universal and pre-dated the Messiah, and can be validated in the Encyclopedia (Britannica). However, the Esoteric-Christian-Movement would call the Messiah (or the Father) … Yahuah/Yahusha and are adamant that words such as ‘Lord’ and ‘God’ are not names but are titles. The Egyptians had the cross and the Ank, the Ank being a variation of the cross, which was utilised in many ways, not just as a symbol that reflects nature but as a tool for revitalising sexual energy.               

In the x-files ‘The Gift’, the circular cross-symbol or divine cross is described as a medicine wheel, a symbol for healing associated with North American shamans. The circle represents the continuum of life, death, and the intersecting lines; one represents happiness, the other sorrow. This is somewhat similar to the divine cross in Kabbalah, the wheel of incarnation. The shamans use it as a symbol to summon the soul-eater that would eat away the sickly (literally).            

Then there is the 2012 Madonna symbol. Madonna recently had strange [social-media] diary posts about the Covid quarantines, describing it as ‘the great equaliser.’ The pop singer has a net value of 600 million dollars and probably chose the wrong word for her reference. Use the phrase atomiser instead. The symbol used in the ritualised Super Bowl half-time event seems to depict the letter M intersected with the X symbol – she stands above the symbol, above the sacred centre, with the letter M standing in for wings. The letter M also means mother-goddess-[scarlet or anti-Venus] – it’s also a zig-zag depiction. In Kenneth Grant’s book cover, the zig-zag depicts contact with daemons. I’m not saying there is an association, merely pointing out that in the early ’60s, some celebrities were deeply fixated on Crowley’s world, which Kenneth Grant was a student of. And Madonna is no stranger to kabbalah.             

Sages may condemn using images to perceive the nature of being as it may lean towards idolatry, and denying it becomes iconoclasm because thought images manifest language into matter. Ironically, it’s the iconoclasts with their imperative disdain to consciously negate the image that put forward the image’s actual value. Much the same way Atheists dissected the Bible to prove to the world its inherent fallacy (one of those fallacies – which truthers are on board with – is the Bible having been re-written by the Catholic Church), and in doing so, give themselves more of an understanding for the transcendental than your average Christians, Atheists only being limited by their passive role and nihilism.

Researchers that sway towards an Esoteric-Christian-Movement but do not inherently define themselves with such a label have pointed out (in a post-Zeitgeist world) that Jesus was not hung on a cross but hung in a tree – the image of that is illustrated in the Arcana cards. It is also stated in Deuteronomy chapter 21-23 that the punishment for sin is worthy of death and is to be hung from a tree. However, what is not in scripture (this includes the Torah and Old Testament) is any mention of being hung on a cross; I guess you could say these are some of the first transcribed fake news/hoaxes that can be validated.

.

.

.

.

---

.

Image and its Dialectics [Posted initially on 13th May 2021]: There is no doubt that ‘truth’ can be an ambiguous notion, and when it comes to history … notions like ‘facts’ slide between facts and myths. So, adding ‘movement’ after truth, as in ‘truth movement, is like a wave set to hit the shores of contemporary ideals. We know Christian-conspiracy- theory can be self-defeating, but in a modern context, it plays a role in shaping social and political ideals. It’s gnostic but a debased version of Gnosticism. Often, their absolutism creates a duality of ideals or dialectic polarity of truth and can usually lead to a perpetual stalemate. All this is a form of an information war waged upon you and is strongly Hegelian and rational in its dialectic approach, making no room for the true spiritual Gnostic self.                 

The debasement version of Gnosticism would mean that the word ‘meaning’ would not reach its synthesis. This means the evaluation of ‘things,’ events, people, etc. When one can see/perceive a value in/of something, someone, etc., one can establish a meaningful relationship with the other (being ‘thing’). Meaning is a perceived value attached to something, some person, situation, or event concepts/beliefs (religion with its symbols and ideas). This type of meaning is fully charged (emotional issues)… often there are several levels to ‘value’ and ‘meaning’, varying from survival value to aesthetic value and intangible value. The association with meaning can take time; specific frameworks and contexts must be present for meaning to emerge. We can further appreciate authentic content by developing our simple perception and intuitive awareness. Marty Monteiro has developed a theory of interaction that incorporates some essential features in this regard.     

This can benefit and connect people with meaningful context and meaning, which otherwise may be perverted; this process can stimulate intuition in oneself, determining the result from the work they set up upon themselves. A gradual comprehension of information allows intuition to grow. The spiritualist teacher must often finish, re-educate or re-contextualise mainstream Christian’s many claims of truth or half-truth. The canon paradigm in which Christians follow to a fault without question is concerning. Due to occult texts (like the Nag-Hammadi, the Book of Enoch, and so forth), the Gospel of Christ and occult (hidden) teachings cannot be separated.

The term ‘modern myth’ as a focal point at this time is inaccurate; one must view it timelessly and truth as a timeless quality. This attribute can never really be modern in a post-Jung, post-Campbell era. View it in the way of new units coming in, but the name of those units (myth) is still the same. A typical case … using the movie The Matrix as an example: the ‘Agents’ (gatekeepers, techno-archons) are Angels (or Archons) of old. Within this, also viewing ‘myth’ as something more important than fact – facts can change, and there is a transient quality to facts. Blavatsky also mentions that one must go through several factors in interpreting myths.

These units are often understood with more meaning, which usually coincides with an awakening in the spiritual and the false constructs of the world. The archetypical ‘hero call’ is often led by that awakening and afterwards a ‘mission.’ The illusion of a system that sits upon a false one hints at an allegorical truism in today’s society. Stephen Hoeller, paraphrasing Alan Watt, ascribes to the notion that our lives are about: “taking away the pejorative meaning of disillusionment and we should re-establish the idea that we all need to be disillusioned, having our illusion taken away …because only in that way, we can find our way to reality.” (Hoeller, S)

The viewpoint of living in an illusory world and that we need to cut through that illusion world and awake from it, and when we awaken, we are not going to awaken to something good right away, but rather the awareness of things that are darker and more powerful, more conspiring, the result of that presence … maybe, is a way to achieving our freedom (the first steps before taking physical action) by the liberation of the self within. It is slightly differentiated by Christians’ belief in the faith of Christ, but not the Christos; there are many steps to this, and at least they have the first one (or be it a transfixed step). 

This, in turn, has ultimately dampened society’s transcendental progression, and so when one is confronted by such extremism, people lack spiritual strength because they are not connected with anything. Except for our bodies, money and ideals, this will be an unsustainable living process during a specific time and when reaching that peak. The answer to such a problem is to recover your spiritual roots but realise there are no recognisable differences between transcendental awakening and spiritual recognition of human potential. On the other hand, one aspect of the two …must go deeper; there will be no spiritual effective potential as long as we stay in a limited state of consciousness; an example of such limitation takes form in a dialectic approach, but before critical dialecticism, one must understand symbols and images through general semantics, as to identify any blockages.

This, in turn, has ultimately dampened society’s transcendental progression, so when confronted by such extremism, people lack spiritual strength because they are not connected with anything. Except for our bodies, money and ideals, this will be an unsustainable living process during a specific time and we are reaching that peak. The answer to such a problem is to recover your spiritual roots but realise there are no recognisable differences between transcendental awakening and spiritual recognition of human potential. On the other hand, one aspect of the two …must go deeper; there will be no spiritual effective potential as long as we stay in a limited state of consciousness; an example of such limitation takes form in a dialectic approach, but before critical dialecticism, one must understand symbols and images through general semantics, as to identify any blockages.

Korzybski (Vitvan’s) General Semantics: Vitvan’s re-interpretation of (Korzybski) General Semantics is about developing forces and energies that are in Mother Nature by understanding it to an extent that is helpful to everyone, and in its simplicity, becomes effective in the understanding process. Through ignorance and reification of symbols and words, over-intellectualisation and 2000 years of knowledge being suppressed have steered the human population astray. This turning point has blocked the natural flow of energy to a large degree, and it has become an expression of something else entirely. This is something else that now forms the basis of what we know civilisation to be. An overemphasis on materialism fuelled by egoism is a distortion of the minds of the human race, resulting in the forgetting of our true purpose and destiny.

Vitvan emphasises that we live in a dynamic energy world, out of which eventuate ‘things’, ‘bodies’, the configuration of units of energy. The conception of ‘things’ and ‘bodies’ are part of a semantic device, a sort of artefact that helps people remember that those artefacts do not exist. Therefore, energy and the configurations of units of those energies are all there is. Vitvan expresses that subtle energies are a natural phenomenon, intrinsic to nature and somewhat a proto-antithesis to a metaphysics mindset. This distinction is not new, but a way to express an aspect of consciousness through a filter of a science-spiritual definition; Vivtvan foresaw a change of this mentality, a change in orientation towards life, a splitting in the mind taking place in the world. One is stuck in a static ‘material’ world; the other is about new ideas on how to live sustainably.

A way to view general semantics is through one of two paradigms: one, using the analogy of how a camera works: how the lens processes images through a plate, and two, by the focused manifestations of the mind through electrical and magnetic neurons. The difference or (a closer truth) between the old and new paradigm is that ‘light’ is thought, and the thought of what we are intended to see is implanted within the liquid crystal prism of the brain.

---

What is an abstraction? It is ‘to draw from’, drawing/receiving stimuli while also meaning ‘drawing inferences’. An essential factor is that the image is not the ‘thing-in-itself’. Identifying the two in the same way confuses the order of abstraction. The zero-order must come before the first, and that zero order is the ‘energy configuration’; any confusion with an image of the ‘thing’ itself is to live in ignorance about the dynamic nature of life’s processes. Physicists postulate that there is no ‘static world’; everything changes and transforms internally and externally. Furthermore, only a tiny portion is registered and processed from the infinite range of frequencies/energies. This means that only some bandwidths can be registered in the very nature and structure of the human nervous system, and so many aspects of nature are unknown to us. In the film, the matrix neo approaches cipher after his slumber and asks Cypher, ‘Do you always see it in coding?’ where Cypher replies, ‘‘well, you have to; image translators work for the program’. – (The Matrix 1999)

Spiritual evolution takes form in cellular upregulation through light waves and other factors; the result is having more enzymes waking up or a re-connection both in the cells and psyche to a past where we had a higher spiritual self. If you think the old paradigm is abstract, the new paradigm goes deeper. The dialectical response to the ‘thing itself’ not being the image is that ‘thing itself’ is pre-implanted through our brains as subliminal suggestions, and we believe in these senses when all it is …is light.

The second order of abstraction is labelling, when one assigns a label (word) to the image, which becomes substantive. This is an unconscious expression, ‘a tree’, ‘my body’, ‘my wife / my husband’, etc. General semantics is about identifying symbols (words) and becoming aware of the conscious and unconscious aspects of it. Order of abstraction is a natural process, but it has pitfalls, and one of those pitfalls is identifying the word with the label when the label stands for the image or the ‘thing itself’. Korzybski said: ‘The map is not the territory’; this is what general semantics is about. You won’t find these thought processes in our educational system; the corruption lies in ignorance. If such a notion is embraced by academic institutions, such knowledge can work as programs that can factor in …a collective change of thought.

Corruption (confusion) in the orders of abstraction: Understanding general semantics is a way to decipher mind viruses brainwashing mechanisms (advertising, media –alternative/mainstream), which is a way of controlling or managing truth. Liberation from such structures validates a higher truth to recognise well–funded, well-planned false flags and hoaxes, which rarely have victims, but not always (one event that stands apart is the 9/11 event, a false flag event that had victims, a constructed situation using technological advancements with corrupt institutional backings, which makes this event a pivotal point in history because they made themselves known).

Post 9/11 showed or awakened people to a new enemy, an empire, to which most people were oblivious. Also, the realisation of how deep the control goes from media (entertainment/reality) to corporatism to government. The result of this event paved the way for a rampart disinformation and misinformation dialectical war on everything under the sun. Many vested interests are at stake, so being alert to mainstream, independent, and alternative media raises self-awareness and can change the structure from the bottom up. Subgroups will emerge within each group, such as alternatives to alternative media, because truth can be manipulated or bought. Ultimately, individuals must take responsibility for discerning the truth. An essential factor is having ‘faith’—not just faith in God, but also a broader sense of faith itself.

Examples of confused abstraction:

There is a Human tendency to identify them with the images they abstract from the dynamic configurations in the energy world. Along with adding values attributed to these images, a world of false-to-fact abstractions is built, hampering a free flow of creative energy. This leads to what we call ‘blockages” (also leading to blockages in the nervous system, ‘body’, etc.) The solution is to abstract consciously, about which Vitvan writes in his booklets’ Veil of Maya’, ‘Perceptive Insight’ and ‘Clear Thinking’. (Euser M, 2007)

Vitvan recommends not using words for which no proper referent or reference has been established, building up words, labels, and so forth for higher order abstractions. We form notions upon hearing words we don’t have referents, so the nervous system creates artificial referents after repeated exposure to such words. As a result of false-to-fact notions, continual, habitual use of words that do not have referents is devastating, both individually and racially. There is no way to Jump from ‘C’ to ‘A’ without proper indication, and strictly advice not to use words with no referents.

.

.

Occultism and Post-awakening Natures:

.

.

---

.

Occult Traditions and State Religion [Posted initially on 02 May 2021]: After the Dark Ages, people forgot where they came from, and the Bible was the only way to know themselves. However, the Bible would be meaningless without the context, and the Church had destroyed a vast network of knowledge. Other nations have rediscovered and preserved these lost classic works of literature. People who understood them and translated those works were viewed by Catholic society at the time as sinister—the same can be said with the attitudes in fundamentalism today.

It was frowned upon to know or understand anything about the ancient world during that time, which meant knowing anything before Jesus was looked down on. Understanding solar symbols regarding Christ was the common consensus; anything beyond that is heresy. The same can be said in the last decade, where most traditional Christians are illiterate in theology and only going by what they know through preachers and fundamentalists – who withheld the solar connection to Jesus. To them, this connection would be affirming occultism [something terrible]. We have politics repeating itself inversely throughout several millennia. We have a group earlier wanting to know if there was a historical Jesus – and a modern group who believes in the historical Jesus so adamantly that they forgot the solar mystical aspect beyond the resurrection aspect.

The rediscovery of symbolism as a reaction to something terrible is about fear – to something so agreeable that it was part of daily life in the ancient world. Nothing was sinful about it – it was part of their vocabulary, and they used it to express their ideas. In modern times, fundamentalism and Christianity, in many ways, are becoming aware of something that was forgotten: an esoteric past. And this reflects the present time, which is out of their control. And by being aware it, means [for them] a resistance to that – for them, it’s all too pagan; all too occult.

What we call the animist or pagan mindset resulted from agriculture concerning the nature of harvesting, which was about the mother mythology and its mysteries. With the rise of cosmopolitanism, the surge of mother mythology and animism morphed into something that paralleled the agriculture and technology of that time. From mystery, religion appeasing the harvest became a personal relationship with those deities. This also came due to people becoming disenchanted with the old religion. So, the ancient mystery cults [secret cults] at that time introduced gods [the pantheon Greek gods], which were imported from the eastern Mediterranean [Syria, Phoenicia, and Turkey]. The mystery cults fed a deep spiritual hunger that was brought on by this malaise and dissatisfaction with the old religion.

These gods, now known as Hercules, Aphrodite, etc., were ecstatic, loud, and vibrant. It reached the point that these cults were outlaws, disreputable, and controversial but would later be respected by political leaders and soldiers. This would result in a worship of the (cult)-state.

This would later change into henotheism and then into Christianity. It is more about worshipping the priesthood, state, class, money, and government; these were the monotheistic traditions. This would then again carry on through the late Roman period through the Middle Ages and up to the Renaissance—and from the Renaissance, it would go into the age of reason and enlightenment.

I assume through common sense that there was a time when the monotheistic state and traditions had yet to be consolidated. This means there were two sets of understandings regarding monotheistic theology. The first was the worship of Apollo, Athena, Zeus, etc., who represent the god of the polis/state, which reflected what was happening with the culture at the time. The second would be about a change from worshipping those gods to something more unified – this came about through the rise of individualism and henotheism, to which Constantine was a significant contributor. Apollo, the god of the state during Hellenistic Greece, would become a monotheistic Christian god, Jesus. 

Another essential contributor to this state religion was Josephus, the only person who wrote accounts of the messianic movement throughout Judaea. Joe Atwill’s Caesar’s Messiah draws a parallel between the events of the gospel and the events described in the military campaign of the Romans, which Titus ran. He concludes that Jesus’s whole ministry was invented based on military campaigns. Jesus was a fictional character invented as an alternative [Caesar’s Messiah] for the messianic movement that could exist within the empire.       

Josephus [possibly a fictional persona] is similar to Constantine. Both had contact with the divine, a common thread in moving specific agendas. This makes the notion that contact with spirit is unconscious or less credible. Superstition used as a construct for campaigning is possible, but the phenomenon surrounding contact with the divine is an actual occurrence. His inspiration came from a supernatural event in which God appeared to him. He advocated that the old covenant between God and the Jews was broken and that a new covenant between God and Rome was to take place.

Another account was with Vespasian [a Caesar], who was in Alexandria; he went into the Serapis temple and prayed. While there, he came into contact with the divine [the Egyptian god Serapis]. Vespasian came out claiming he was the new Serapis – for ‘Serapis has come into me’. Then he works miracles, cures a withered arm, and makes a blind man see.          

These were common psychological mind operations or political routines when Caesar’s rulers would take on the personage of local gods. Other ruling countries/empires used these techniques long before the Roman Empire. The absorption of traditional religion is a point of control.

When it comes to the Son of Man in the Gospel, it can run parallel with Titus Flavius, who claimed to be a Jewish Christ. His court historians said that the Jewish prophecies of a messianic world ruler foresaw the Flavian Caesar. The Son of Man that Jesus envisioned to come within 40 years was a Jewish Christ [Titus Flavius] who had political motivations in developing Christianity—the Roman Caesar.
And so Rome made Christianity a state religion because, at the time, you were either a Roman Catholic or Jew. The state religion was a way to mitigate rebellion. In this way, the Pont of Maximus [Pope] could operate as Caesar, but not through the guise of a circular conquering warmonger, but rather through the likeness title of minister of Jesus Christ. This was a challenging feat for the Romans to accomplish. The Empire required the worship of Caesar, and the Jews of Israel wouldn’t agree to that – their strong religious stance not to accept graven images only reinforced a stronger belief in their God. So, there was a rebellion.

However, this rebellion [messianic movement] was unique because it had a religious component and was often bloody. It allowed them to push the Romans out for a specific time, and then the Jews were able to establish their nation-state – right in the middle of the Roman Empire at its very height. Their fervour was so strong that upon having military control of their armies, they were able to commit mass genocide towards the Gentiles. 

Jewish scripture had a lot of genocidal concepts concerning the Gentiles, notably the position of the fundamentalist Jews who saw them as racially distinct. The Romans saw this aspect of the liturgy as what would motivate the Jews. And it would dawn on them that Christianity was a way… to impose a slow simulation on their empire. There was widespread dissatisfaction, particularly in Alexandria, a Jewish city outside of Israel. You have the Egyptians, Jews, and the Greeks mixing. A group called the Sethians would come into the scene in this mix. They thought themselves descendants of set(h) – or Jesus was an emanation of Seth. You can discern in their scripture that they were unimpressed with Templar Judaism. They were distancing themselves from the Davidic elite.

You can see this concept mirrored in the Christian identity movement. The difference, however, is that they were more radical in their racial stance than being dissatisfied. The Sethian gnostic group would inspire Philo of Alexandria to introduce the Hellenic idea of logos – into his esoteric Judaism. So, there was an esoteric Judaism that picked up Hellenistic ideas and Egyptian ideas. Eventually, the combination of warfare and the new Religion took hold, and the Romans physically forced the Jews out of Judaea and would see the end of that struggle.

Constantine only began the process of the state religion [Christianity] because the state religion had already become a feudal system following a collection of bullet points that other leaders had to obey for the empire. Constantine used military force to put Christian Churches around the State, a Church that had military backing. Christianity was put there as a psychological operation or propaganda to prevent rebellion by the serfs. It was easier for them to follow the Pope [which was Caesar in another name] than the Caesar of Rome.  

A specific tribe or chosen family from Judaea became part of the Roman Empire, notably the Philo of Alexandria. The central bloodline family of the Roman Empire chose particular groups, and the Romans would have a Jew leading their troops from a famous Jewish intellectual family. It was a soup of bloodlines and theological claims mixed with political-military and financial issues. Everyone else would either be banished or something worse unless they joined them under the banner of Christianity.

Christianity was formed to mitigate peasants’ rebelling, and Christianity’s role in the feudal system brought up many suspicions. It was a slave system that existed for more than a thousand years, and the ruler was the Pope. It boils down to a money grab and power, with Christianity being the controlling apparatus for that feudal system. And it would be Christianity itself that would also play a part in the fall of Rome.

New Atlantis and the Phoenician Connection: So the question that aligns with this thesis becomes … When did an enlightened rebelling new world on the backs of the dream of the New Atlantis become the empire that would continue in a slightly different – but ultimately the same apparatus? On the ideals of a sola scriptura and the absolute, it’s a secular style, new religion, new Christianity. On the other hand, the equilibrium of restraint has been set by an empire that has gone through it before. And they would come to break down those restraints [equilibrium] on a mission for a literal New Jerusalem [the antithesis of the lost Atlantis] – a fictional city [akin to a fictional re-return of Jesus] that would never come.      

And what is new Christianity if not a combination of secular heliocentrism and [protestant/evangelical] Christianity? What is Christianity if not Freemasonry, and what is Freemasonry if not Mithraic and Druidic revival, made famous by Thomas Paine’s research? Researchers found a link between the Masons and Templars [two different secret societies] was that the Templars were a bridge between the ancient and modern secret societies. The common thread of Masonry and Christianity is the worship of the Sun. Thomas Paine outlined that the only difference in Christianity is that they put a man called Jesus Christ in the place of the Sun and paid him the same admiration, which was initially for the Sun. In masonry, the many ceremonies of the Druids are preserved in their original state—the Sun is held as a logo embedded within the iconography of that religion and followed into the secret lodge.

Paine also concluded that many Temple designs, notably the Solomon Temple, were inspired by the Dionysian Artificers of Phoenicia (also known as Zidonians). Paine derived Masonry to the Druids and further back to Shemsu Hor. Manly P Hall also recorded the influence of the Mithraic Mysteries of Freemasonry, such as the importance of initiatory degrees. The image of the cross plays a substantial symbolic role in Mithraism.  

Initiation into the rites of Mithras, like initiation into many other ancient schools of philosophy, apparently consisted of three important degrees. Preparation for these degrees consisted of self-purification, the building up of the intellectual powers, and the control of the animal nature…. After his initiations were over, he was hailed as one who had risen from the dead, was instructed in the secret teachings of the Persian mystics, and became a full-fledged member of the order. Candidates who successfully passed the Mithraic initiations were called Lions and were marked upon their foreheads with the Egyptian cross.

.

New Atlantis is a book by Sir Francis Bacon, a new incarnated title version of the lost Atlantis idea.  And it’s said that the book was a Masonic blueprint for creating the American Republic. Bacon was just one of many other occultists in Queen Elizabeth’s [the first] court. He was also touched by the divine spirit coming to him. Ancient mysteries were revived centred on England and interactions with esoteric groups like the Rosicrucians, Kabbalists, and Alchemists. The founding fathers were Freemasons, members of secret Masonic-type societies – it’s a type because its derivation comes from Europe. Masonic degrees of Initiation adopted rituals and beliefs in their expression. 

In the Odyssey, Atlantians are called Phaeacians, which are fantastical clones of the real world of Phoenicians. The mystery deepens when the sea people [nomads of the sea] come to Phoenicia and influence their culture. Researcher Ignatius Donnelly claims the sea people were nothing less than the remnant of Atlantis. He also claims they chose Phoenicia for its important topographical position and sea roots. It matched the area that the old Atlantean Empire voyaged to. When Columbus sailed to discover a new world or re-discover an old one, he took his departure from a Phoenician seaport, founded by that great race two thousand five hundred years previously.

After Phoenicians having mixed with the sea-people it furthered intrigue by weird mystic researchers like David Icke who would claim that these Phoenicians were these white-skinned and blue-eyed people that matched his reptilian-human crossbreed theory. This is a subtle nod to the mythical elder beings and the bloodlines that came out of them. This parallels angels coming down from Heaven and breeding with human women, which spawned Nephilims. In all prehistory, and among important archetypal key points in civilizations; have always had some contact or experience with spirits. These beings of intrigue are varied in their archetypal form: the Reptilian – and its vampire-like nature. An older myth of intrigue is Elve-like beings; blue-eyed super psychics that once roamed the fabled centered city, where once the Sun was just a shimmer. And their true light came from the plasmic nature that illuminated out from the Saturnian sky. 

After the Phoenicians had mixed with the sea people, it furthered intrigued by weird mystic researchers like David Icke, who would claim that these Phoenicians were white-skinned and blue-eyed people that matched his reptilian-human crossbreed theory. This is a subtle nod to the mythical elder beings and the bloodlines that came out of them. This parallels angels coming down from Heaven and breeding with human women, which spawned Nephilims. In all prehistory, and among important archetypal key points in civilisations, there has always been some contact or experience with spirits. These beings of intrigue are varied in their archetypal form: the Reptilian – and its vampire-like nature. An older myth of intrigue is Elve-like beings, blue-eyed super psychics that once roamed the fabled centred city, where once the Sun was just a shimmer. And their true light came from the plasmic nature that illuminated the Saturnian sky.

Phoenicians not only influenced Freemasonry but also influenced Greek and Jewish Culture. It influenced the many Greek gods: Heracles, Dionysus, Cadmus, etc. The word ‘Bible’ itself came from ‘Byblos’, which meant ancient paper.

Solomon’s Temple was built in 996 BC and was an integral part of Freemasonry. Furthermore, it was built by King Solomon, King Hiram, and Hiram Abiff. The Temple and its Pillars and its influence on Freemasonry are further intrigued by King Hiram and Hiram Abiff, Phoenicians from Tyre. The Templars financed the building of that Temple. The Knight-hood we understand today is a direct outgrowth of Mithraic Cults of ancient Rome, which also influenced the Knight Templars. Both had a commonality. Mithraic Cults influenced the Roman legion as well.

The Templars came to fruition in upper Normandy and radiated into England, but it was a Norman enterprise, first and foremost. These Normans were a mixture of Vikings [Scandinavian] and Franks. Striking motives, these Normans/Templars are intrigued to find lost artifacts, notably the ‘Ark of the Covenant,’ but before that, the mystery intrigues them. They had to battle with French king Charlemagne, who wanted to Christianize the indigenous beliefs of Northern Europe. The Normans would be converted in the 10th century, but this conversion as political expediency went no deeper than aristocracy, as paganism was still practised secretly. 

These rebel Normans, who kept their pagan religious fervour, made their way to Venice. These rebels, now gangsters and pirates aligned with Venice as a military force, were able to take over Normandy. The first crusade was the Norman Conquest of England, directed and financed by Venice … And, of course, Venice was nothing more than the old Phoenician empire reborn in the heart of Italy. The Normans would grow their claim to occupying North Africa, Malta, Sicily, Antioch, and England under the Templar Flag. Then, it expanded to France, Jerusalem, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Cyprus. This empire-building was forged on the impetus of the Crusades. The Norman/Templars had reconstructed almost entirely the old Phoenician Empire. Phoenicians became Venetians.

The Normans made anew in the Templars and continued in the Crusade. The Knights Templar was created to complete the work the Normans and their Venetian partners started. In that campaign, the fake news of the time was to claim that the Templars’ mandate was to protect pilgrims on the way to Jerusalem. This is put into question when there were only nine Templars at that time. When they reached Solomon’s Temple, they started to excavate for hidden tunnels and treasure.

In history, the Phoenicians were the conduits of Shemsu Hor – Sun worship dissemination to the Celtic people and perhaps the establishment of Druidry itself. The Druids were a combination of priests, magistrates, scholars, and physicians. People admired them, in common with Brahmans of India, the Magi of Persia, and the priests of Egyptians. The Druids taught and believed in one god, whom they named “Be’al” (the life of everything), associated with the Phoenician Baal. The Roman Church defeated the Deuids but was revived in secret by Freemasonry.

Paine linked Christianity and Freemasonry to the Druidic sun worship, but Ignatius Donnelly took it further and traced it back to Atlantis. Phoenicians, known as sea-people, emphasised the Pillars of Hercules as part of their identity. Given my ongoing fascination with sacred space/centre, the pillars symbolise the actual North Pole a.k.a. sacred centre. Atlantean religion and culture were brought to the world, but there is a mystical quality to this race of people that is open to fantasy writers and high-strange authorities. Some try to rationalise this by linking to other Bronze Age cultures, but it could be another variation of the sea people.   

Francis Bacon argued that the mysteries were defeated by Constantine but laid dormant in the heart of the new state cult and were waiting for some genius to come along and liberate them. Bacon, “who sailed his little ship far out into the unexplored sea of learning through the Pillars of Hercules, and whose ideals for a new civilization are magnificently expressed in the Utopian dream of The New Atlantis.” – Hall  

Though Christianity shattered the material organization of the pagan Mysteries, it could not destroy the knowledge of supernatural power which the pagans possessed. Therefore it is known that the Mysteries of Greece and Egypt were secretly perpetuated through the early centuries of the church, and later, by being clothed in the symbolism of Christianity, were accepted as elements of that faith. – Hall

.

So the question asks … has it been liberated? And to me, ‘yes,’ but inversed the new Christianity, as I mentioned earlier, is no different from Christianity of Rome. Both use the same spree décor tactics, but ignorance [and conspiracy theory] is playing a part, not in the lack of knowledge because it’s there to be taken, but the refusal of knowledge – then truth. This is the fundamentalist aspect. … the tail end of Constantine came to an end. Still, the tail end of a secret society that perpetuated that old religion as a mirror to Constantine… reemerged in the stars and stripes of soldiers with automatic weapons in the guise of Christianity.

Modern Misunderstanding: Western worship of deities gets murky when the hyperrealism narrative gets introduced. Whether it’s Christian conspiracy theory propaganda and hyperrealism or New-Age-&-the-accelerating-evolution and hyperrealism, both lack a common truism, and that is cultural/historical amnesia. Understanding occult traditions, even in their basic form, gives you more context; therefore, you’re less prone to react with a closed mind. Without it, you will find that the word ‘occult’ gets redefined not on purpose but through a consensus of ignorance.

Most traditional Christians define the occult inaccurately due to their ignorance. The word ‘occult’ came about during a time when the Church was seen as powerful. As a way to suppress competition, knowledge became occult or hidden. After the Dark Ages, Christianity evolved, and while doing so, they forgot memory and context. They forgot where parables, revelations, and prophecies came from. 

Fast-forward to our present moment, and our modern world has gone through an apocalypse, meaning a collective uncovering of truth. This would mean the definition of the occult no longer applies because it’s no longer hidden—somewhat similar to an exoteric meaning.      

The emergence of a state cult [old gods awakening] alongside an apocalyptic reveal of truth [due to the information age] can parallel what the mystery cults felt when they had to fill people’s dissatisfaction with their old religion. The modern parallel lies after the revilement of truth, and for those from the far-right as well as the traditional Christian populace, who feel disenchanted with a Christ-Jesus that can’t be proven through historical records – would mean for old gods to awake, their monotheistic singular god must sleep; However, this doesn’t have to be the case.  

Before you label me a heretic, consider these old gods to be just the many Children of Adam(as), as explored in the Apocrypha text, Cave of Treasures. Adam, the first anthropologist, thought that Christ was the template that inspired the creator God for Adam on Earth. I’ve hinted that Adam is the original archetypal model of Horus, then Christ [Logos]. In this regard, old gods can exist amidst the original Logos.

It’s not about the fear of old gods awakening but about the Celestials of Spirit beings put back into the hierarchal order of things. Non-secularists viewed planets not as orbital spherical objects but as spiritual entities endowed with their own will. Surrounded by invisible angels or spirits put in place by God as part of the mechanism that weaves together the fabric of the microcosm [lesser world], that is, elements, minerals, vegetables, human beings, and so forth.  

In the secular view, planets were modelled or based on the old gods stripped of their spirit and magic. They were given a Darwinian probability model of chance and randomness that would instigate evolution. The North Pole would act as a simulacrum, while the true North would be many degrees away, just like the Earth, as the centre of its concentric system gets dislodged from its central place. True North [a concept known to civil and architectural engineers] is fixed and symbolically [also figuratively] and linked to the Polaris Star – [also known as the tail of the little bear] represents a transfixed symbolic / star-fixture for the pole of heaven. The little bear symbolizes man’s divine part anchored to the pole of heaven; this is the pledge of eternal stability.

This eternal stability, when demystified, can be described as a coaxial orbit. It’s when all the planets are in alignment on one axis. Take that image and filter it back again through myths, and you’ll find that this image was one of many arrangements in the sky; there were no orbits, just this coaxial stability. Then, something happened; the myth goes Saturn fell, and Jupiter would take the reign. Jupiter would then bring the four seasons. Hesiod once described Jupiter as bringing in the harshness of the four seasons, but Saturn maintained one season. The Polaris star is known as the tail end of the Little Bear constellation, and Ursa Major, the Great Bear constellation, makes a svastika symbol when depicted in all four seasons.

Saturn, Satan, and also Sut are allegorized as transforming themselves into beasts. This elementary power became embodied in the forms of life below man and in the animal part of man himself. Saturn is also Kronos – the god of time, who sits at the top of the celestial hierarchy, while the soulful and fleshly Anthropos sit above Saturn [Kronos], and the creator-God sits above Saturn.

Saturn or Satan, or more precisely ‘Sut’, is a name that commemorates cyclic events, usually through carnivals. The derivation of Saturnalia to Satan is about misconceptions when it’s really about recognising Saturn as the chief of the primary seven powers [the seven planetary soul garments]. The chief has gone by many names: Sevekh, Seb, Set, Sut, or Satan. Genesis, through Job, states he was released for the seven periods of the cycle where Horus had to do combat with him. Horus or Iusa (Jesus) in the “house of a thousand years” was the bringer of the millennium, while Sut or Satan was bound for a thousand years, the millennium of peace. Saturnalia, the idea of release from bondage and its elemental powers, represent human nature and its in and out aspects. Saturn or Satan and their elemental powers are unbound when god comes into incarnation, and, as Paul shows, they bring sin [time] to birth. In astrology, Saturn is the power that limits or constricts the native. Horus and Sut alternatively bind each other and as often escape bondage. 

Saturn has always been Kronos or (Athoth). The slightly incorrect assumption that it’s Yahweh has a bearing on the Jewish elite that somehow they’re responsible for all the high conspiracy. However, Zionism is still favoured among traditional-right Christians. There is undoubtedly a conflict of interest here. The conspiratorial contention [a Gnostic idea] arrives at the notion that the God of the three significant Religions, the Creator-God, Yaldabaoth or Demiurge [or, incorrectly, Yahweh], is a negative one. That particular group of the elite has created these mind control type religions where they have indicated a peaceful loving God, but deep inside, intuitively think otherwise. This negative God would give a reason for worship that adheres to certain types of rituals and occult practices on the back of that notion.

This worldview is slightly narrow because rituals by secret societies are evident. They are either in secret or in public. The overt aspect is usually grandiose, like in sporting events with a focus on symbolic intent—a sort of subconscious initiation pact with the viewer. The subtle is found in media in all forms, while the other is false flags.

The Brotherhood of Saturn is an extrapolation of what Jews are. Conspiracy theorists add the conspiracy of Satanism to invoke a symbolic image of a red beast with two horns. The Jews perpetrate no evil death cult – no matter how much paranoid Christian-conspiracy-theorist claim. They align in the worship of Saturn as an astrological marker – that beyond Saturn is God’s realm, and below Saturn becomes more manifest until it reaches the material.         

The Saturnian cult associates itself with the Black Cube. Muslims go to the Kaaba and then go around the Cube in an anti-clockwise position. Essentially, the Cube depicts the rings of Saturn; Saturn is the black Kaaba. They also wear a cube on their foreheads, signifying worship of that altar. Unknown to Westerners, they also unknowingly give the same kinds of worship—when you graduate and get your degrees, you wear a black dress and square hat. These are Saturnian rituals.

It is said souls are released through the rings of Saturn [the wheel of incarnation] at the tropic of Capricorn [represents where the souls descend], and opposite Capricorn is Cancer [where the moon is positioned], which is where the souls come in. [Tropic of] Cancer is the gateway of Men, and Capricorn is the gateway of the gods. Both of these nodes in the arc of the circle are found in the divine cross – where the ecliptic crosses the equator in the heavens [Gemini and Torus and Sagittarius and Scorpio].  As it turns yearly, so does the incarnation process.

Old gods were put to sleep and became planets with materialistic processes instead of spiritual ones. A monotheistic endeavour is a secular endeavour as well. This is a unification model that matches a globalist template. This seems odd considering there is resistance to it among Republicans who hold their individualism in high importance. Not knowing their religious monotheistic framework is set upon that same unification model, which is the model engineered by Constantine and heliocentrism afterwards.

Protestant symbolic detachment from the Church – a spiritual symbolic detachment of the monad [the Trinity; oneness] means all worship goes through to the Son and His Father [Creator-God] and no other. This is where fundamentalism sits, and it metastasizes in the heart of Christians – what Allan Watts called an attempt to put democracy in heaven. Confuse the son of God as the political Messiah [the boss’s son] from the suffering serpent that was despised and rejected by men. Then, we are asked to follow an impossible gospel. In this detachment, sin is forgiven just as long you follow Jesus, and so guilt becomes institutionalized. I take it further and say it was also weaponized, like how narcissists use guilt to manipulate. Fundamentalism and conspiracy theories exact the same process

An example of this fallacy is found in Christian-fundamentalist-conspiracy-theory types, which would examine the Cube and equate that the Hexagram symbol can be derived from it. They would then find links to the Star of David in the Israel flag, go to its history, and link it to Cabal magical working and link it to Paganism and the New Age. Then, throw in a few Bible quotes, associate Saturn and the planet, and link it to the Occult, Buddhism, Islam, Theosophy, and Hinduism. The relation to Orthodox Judaism and the book of Talmud then includes Maimonidean Rationalism, Kabbalistic Mysticism, and Chassidic Philosophy, and then the link between cabal and occult teachings, throw in King Solomon’s and the book “History and Practice of Magic Volume 2” describes how the seal of Solomon came to be. From this, outline how the Rothschilds started this Zionist movement, and then finish it off by calling for repentance and accepting Jesus Christ as your saviour.

The fallacy lies in memory and context; consolidating groups and philosophies means a conclusion of simplicity. Woke witch hunters use the same process. Ultimately, this leads to misinformation and contradictions. The Zionist movement has the backing of protestant and evangelical groups and is equal in its enterprise; the group that they speak against is the same group they speak for. The hexagram symbol lives in all of us, and it starts as a fertilized egg in utero; it splits, creating the first pedal in the flower of life called Vesica Piscis. Then you get an egg of life, draw a male line in each circle of the egg of life, and you get Metatron’s Cube, and within this Metatron’s Cube is the Six-Sided Hexagram. This knowledge was once occult, but it’s now common sense as shared knowledge.

Fundamentalist Christians attack occult symbolism as if they have actual power, whereas their priests have no real connection to God. In much the same way, attacking a group that may have tried to overthrow monarchs and oppressive governments … Freemasonry was a way to separate Church and State, depose the king of Europe and create public education. These were radical notions in the 1700s. Freemason was originally a tool for serving the class. Instead, they focus on these symbols and are enamoured with fear and hysteria by misunderstood symbols. They are also preoccupied with celebrities covering one of their eyes with their hand. The injustices that they speak for, like a rising police state, are mitigated by their lack of action and are distracted by attacking institutions that did something about it throughout history. Freemasonry and Rosicrucians, as did the Vatican in Europe, slowed down or reduced the medieval royal families’ power. And even then, tens of thousands of them would fall victim to slaughter camps with the rise of Hitler.

We know Christian-conspiracy-theory-(fundamentalists)-groups can be Gnostic with a cutoff point. People can either believe that they have mistaken the Demiurge for the True God or they’re correct, and there is nothing beyond the creator God. This is more of a political move, given their motivation. Theology has been called an intellectual wrapping around the spiritual kernel of a religion. If this is true, then it’s also true that most religions are being strangled and stifled by their wrappings. Gnosticism does not run this danger because its worldview is stated in myth rather than in theology.

.

.

Occultism and Post-awakening Natures:

.

.

---

.

Conflicting Conspiracy theories [Posted initially on 12th April 2021]:  In the last post, I mentioned that Flat-Earth Fundamentalists (Christians) tend to perpetuate a theocratic agenda in light of a Flat-Earth paradigm. [Maybe they are unaware of their actions, but it’s there]. Will Duran’s Caesar and Christ describe Constantine’s intention to save the Roman Empire through Christianity, which brought Western Europe into the Dark Ages? Durant denotes Edward Gibbon; “Christ’s victory had been Rome’s Death.”

It would seem history is on its way to repeating itself, at least for monotheistic religions like Evangelicalism and Protestantism, whose eschatological viewpoint is centred on a religious belief that’s based on literalism. This would, in turn, show itself in the form of interest: Evangelicals that support Jews and the Zionist movement. Alongside this support of Israel, there is the futurist development of the literal coming of New Jerusalem/Jesus Christ [second coming]. “The fact that evangelical Christians express such interest and a sense of shared destiny with Jews and Israel is both fascinating and peculiar given the long-standing anti-Semitism embraced by many Christians and their secular and religious authorities. A shift away from historical anti-Semitism began during the early days of the Protestant Reformation.” – Cambridge University Press.     

The British promise to assist in establishing a national homeland in Palestine was inspired by evangelical support. Another interest for Israel was its connections and predictions of the second coming of Jesus. Books [religious novels] would emerge out of this contention, popularizing the evangelical support of Israel. Of course, these authors/preachers would add their blend of futurist context. These books outline Jews and how the State of Israel plays a central role at the end of the day. Gorenberg identifies the “one potential evangelical motivation to support Israel is grounded in messianic expectations and participation in the divine plan for redemption.” (Gorenberg)

What I’m trying to get at is to point out the parallel between Protestantism’s need to return to a primitive form of Christianity, almost a Judaic form of Christianity. That uses messianism as a way of politics to move government with their military-industrial backing as a modern-day crusade for another theocratic empire. This attempt is somewhat different from other historical theocratic empires that came before. This is due to a denial of the Trinity and that their version of Sola Scriptura is what sets them apart. Sola Scriptura denies early Christian traditions other than the tradition of the canon of scripture [selective acceptance and goal post moving again]. These types of issues were plentiful back in the day of early reformers. They had no resolution then, and none exist today; divisions have increased, and sola scriptura has been doctrinal chaos.

David Icke brought this modern-day crusade apparent to public consciousness through his lectures outlining Zionism as Rothschild-Zionism. He outlines that there is a clear distinction between Jews and (political) Rothschild-Zionism. The majority of Jews are not familiar with the Talmud in which the initiated elite Jews are, and that Jewish people are victims to the Zionists. He says Rothschild-Zionism is not anti-Semitism because Zionism is not about Jewish people and is predominantly a political system putting its secret agencies in power. Zionism and Judaism are opposed, and the Rothschild dynasty created Israel. It outlines that Jews are only two per cent of America, yet they dominate the controlling money for both Democrats and Republicans. Only three countries are left without a Rothschild-controlled central bank: Iran, North Korea, and Cuba. He describes Palestine as a perfect example for the definition of Genocide in which Israel (Political-Zionists) have systematically taken over their land (nation) and racial and religious infrastructure with violence and death.

As a reaction to this fundamentalist-Christian-conspiracy-groups who follow dispensational ideals as well as a belief in a sort of singular monolithic conspiracy of Cabal [out of Earth -Satan, back to earth – Jesuits/Illuminati, etc.] running the show can’t ignore this aspect. To do so would mean disregarding your whole foundation for a New Jerusalem as well as denying Evangelical support for Zionist Israel. So, they promote a Jesuit conspiracy – by claiming that the Jesuits and the Vatican are responsible for the creation of Zionism. Is there merit to this argument, or is it essentially truther/Christian-fundamentalist propaganda for dialectical debate over the conspiracy of power between Jesuits and Zionism?

Fundamentalist-Conspiracy-Groups ascribe to Eric Jon Phelps – a self-proclaimed Jesuit expert that’s part of the Evangelical, anti-Lucifer, and anti-Catholic groups that believe Catholicism is secretly worshipping Babylonian King Nimrod or the potentiality of that (Babylon Messiah). His claims or conspiracy-(theory) entail a disruption of the cosmic order by which the Catholic Church [the Vatican] will put into power a satanic position, the Babylon Messiah. [Well … if you describe apostolic succession this way, of course, you’ll sell more books]. Jon Phelps himself was ousted as an Israeli Diamond Trader, which leads truthers to conclude that he was a Zionist shill, a possible white supremacist, or a Jesuit Temporal coadjutor. This isn’t very clear when you’re all the above, from all the extremes.   

He believes the Jesuit order created Jewish-labor-Zionist [Rothschild-Zionism] came from their Fabian socialist in Britain. Beatrice Sidney Webb and Bernard Shaw were part of this group, which was formed in 1884. This group was also implicated in Orwell’s 1984 writing. As well as supposedly being responsible for communism in Russia. I tried to find evidence or text supporting this claim that Fabian-Socialists created Zionism, and all I saw was not its inception but support or sympathy for Zionism during the war effort [the world wars]. Nor did I find any evidence to support the claim they instigated communism in Russia. Besides being an intellectual think tank for specific political alignments and educational institutions, it also plays host to the movers and shakers of policy or political influencers of that time.

Most of this claim is brought about by a disdain towards intellects such as Annie Besant, head of the Theosophical Society, after the death of Blavatsky, who was among intellects who were part of the first members.[ It remains, however, simply one of many pressure groups in the complex patchwork of power in the modern world, and attempts by twentieth-century conspiracy theorists to define it as the “One Big Conspiracy” have little in common with the relatively modest reality of its influence and achievements. – Element Encyclopedia of Secret Societies]

There is also an obvious straw man tactic being played here. I don’t know how many of these assumptions are true, but for any bold claims, outside external forces/ factors/context and memory must always be considered. Eric Jon Phelps’s conspiracy theories conflict because they have many contradictory claims. As well as (false)-labelling people as Jesuit infiltrators or coadjutors, and no one is safe from this labelling: any prominent political figures from left or right. To him, Jesuits are responsible for any conspiratorial notions known to be sinister, from skulls and bones to Rothschild. All of these: ‘all roads lead to Rome conspiracy’ come clear when you realise that his intention lacks credibility because it’s coming from an Evangelical and Protestant conspiratorial lens. This means being pro-Zionism as well as conveying a slanderous imposition on the Catholic Church, exemplified in claiming the Jesuits are responsible for Communism and Nazism alike.

What’s happening here is a type of narrative play through disinformation consolidating information about certain institutions, governments, secret societies, events, and so forth – to maintain a censored form through sensationalism. Ideologues loyal to either side do not matter in this case – as opposites are nullified through a monolithic Cabal, but it’s never that simple. There is a clear bias to swap the blame from Zionism to Jesuit.

Along with it, a need to perpetuate a fear of uncertainty under the guise that Jesuits are formulating a big war, a coming World War Three, and that it would not be enough for one general to orchestrate it all, so he believes they’re going to need two black-popes. Black pope is the unofficial title that conspiracy -theorists came up with to describe the position of Superior General of the Order of the Jesuits. 

The War in Heaven – and the Mandate for Heaven on Earth: This is made clear when you have two vying factions for the mandate of Heaven. What is the mandate for Heaven? The mandate for Heaven is an assertion from Philip. K.Dick’s book Valis – which describes our geo-political situation on earth, is a reflection of the cosmic relationship that we have with the Demiurge. That we live in an autocratic police state system and matrix-like financial control grid [slaves to our political/elite masters] – is also due to this reflection of what’s going on with the larger cosmic universe. In which we are enslaved or imprisoned by Demiurge. 

This concept can be broken down or simplified as disrupting the cosmic order in heaven (the spiritual world) and its connection to contemporary social and political movements. This can be illustrated by the competition among various factions that believe they have a stake or are chosen to fulfil a prophesied revelation, with Jerusalem playing a central role. In this context, the mandate of heaven is significant, along with the notion of a war in heaven.

Eric Jon Phelps is playing (or adopting) the Protestant/Evangelical mandate for a New Jerusalem and the second coming of Christ. Naturally, his political rivals with different ideologies or religions are these supposed dark forces, and the team he plays for are the light. The most dangerous types of cults are those who think they are not villains but are a force for good.

In reaching this goal, Phelps describes a two-way eschatological process: the first being Jesus Christ, for all the authority has been given to him pursuing Mathew 28:18:19, which offers him juror control. The second is the devil/Satan, in which he has de-facto control. These two heads of Kingdoms need to complete their prophecy. Israel must be re-gathered or reconstituted as a nation so it can enter into the time of the 78 weeks of years of the prophet of Daniel (Daniel: 9:24:27). So there is a future time in which Israel will be re-purposed so when the devil attempts to destroy the Jews, the messiah will come (or return), and the Jews will look upon him and realise the one they hated from its inception is the one that’s going to deliver them. For this to happen, there must be a habitat of Jerusalem with Jews –this is the biblical position – in the satanic position; Satan wanted to establish his Babylon Messiah since the day Adam fell. This anti-Christ is represented as the Babylon Messiah, which is described as the final Pope dying and coming (resurrecting) back to life. For this to happen there must be an Israel, a third temple and a rebuilt city of Babylon.  

So here he introduced apostolic succession but described it especially, where the solar ritual has become part of eschatological revelation examined through the opposite. The anti-Christ can only appear through the final pope, who will die and come back to life as the anti-Christ/Babylon Messiah. What’s happening here is an example of ideological simplicity being played out while keeping the eschatological key point absolute, with a need to attach variations of the futurist narrative around those key points. For instance, the space Cube/New Jerusalem landing in the sacred-Centre – to Phelps’s version of redemption for Jewish people through the enlightenment of Jesus, but won’t happen if there is no habitat or a New Jerusalem. 

Any disruption or resistance to that mission contradicts the cosmic order. This is where the characteristics of war come into play. All forms of evil, hatred, and murder stem from this underlying concept. It is the very thing Christ came to abolish; ironically, Christ has been adopted as the symbol to further this mission. Historical analysis reveals that various movements gained prominence in Medieval Europe, anticipating the Second Coming of Christ as an imminent event. Many of these groups focused on the First Crusade (1096–1099), which was perceived as a holy war leading to the end of days.

A modern examination of this historical event takes on a new Protestant or evangelical perspective. One aspect to consider is the U.S. rationale for war—specifically, the response to post-9/11, which included the goal of eliminating weapons of mass destruction. This approach may distract the U.S. populace from the Military’s efforts to acquire historical artifacts from Iraq’s museums. It raises the possibility that these artifacts are essential for advancing the preparation and mandate of the New Jerusalem initiative. Additionally, some analyses perpetuate conspiracy theories, where individuals claim to represent the public’s voice but ultimately serve as perception managers with their agendas. For example, theorists like Phelps assert that the Jesuits orchestrated a large-scale war reminiscent of World War III. He suggests that it won’t be sufficient for a single general to direct such a conflict; instead, they will require the leadership of two “black popes.” The term “black pope” is an unofficial label created by conspiracy theorists to describe the position of the Superior General of the Jesuit Order.

Of course, this all ties back to old myths concerning Lucifer (or Prometheus), angelic gods who upset the order by taking the light (the faculty of thinking) and giving it to humanity, thus upsetting the cosmic order (there have also been other incidents in heaven, evident throughout historical myth, that caused some other cosmic disruptions).

Phelps would have you believe it was a means to fast-track the final position to become the Babylon messiah. Still, as we know, this is an added narrative borrowing from historical myth – the mythical resurrection. The singular monolithic conspiracy of Cabal that works for Satan/Lucifer [Lucifer is not Satan; more on this later] in this case, Satan is realized in the evolution of the final pope’s ascendancy – is followed by the outgrowth of Satan having a plan, and that his in charge and his lieutenants are the Illuminati and the New World Order.

In the Babylonian version of Lucifer, he was not the devil; he was more akin to the “firstborn son of God” and the “shepherd of mankind” who was “the door” that blocked the gods of war. He was even called on to drive out demons (parallel with Jesus). The Babylonian Lucifer defended his people with “Zeal.” Lucifer is the latest incarnation comparatively to other historical incarnations of the past; he was condemned and exiled in an age where heavenly authority shared common ground with the collective consciousness of the people. He is bound to be freed in an age when authority is seen as corrupt and illegitimate, no matter where you sit on the ideological spectrum. Lucifer’s mythical history goes back to the twenty-fifth century before Jesus, and he was called upon by magicians and sorcerers for thousands of years – Sumerian, Akkadian, and Babylonian Magi; the Jewish people also recognized his elemental power. Lucifer was a god of the people and not the temple and was called upon when things seemed to hit an apocalyptic level.  

Fundamentalism’s whole ideology is dependent on the absolute, especially towards biblical key points, but with slight flexibility towards a narrow version of the imagination – and along with it, a need to conflate certain types of truths [like the literal word of God], and that their interpretation and understanding of that ‘word’ is the only correct and accurate translation. There is an assumption of omniscience that gets passed on as truth to God – and this is what fundamentalism is. Together with conspiracy theory – it has a habit of formulating its truth, and fundamentalist Christians mostly create it. Given that fundamentalism conflates their interpretation and passes it on as truth to God – they attach that same principle to any other subjects, ideas, conspiracies, entertainment, art, imagination, and so forth to any argument they deem wrong. The validation is there before the proof, debate or analysis, and anything regarding what they preach swings in their favour by default. Given that most of their audience is symbolically illiterate and deprived of knowledge of myths. 

This could be a product of an inherent dysfunction; Conspiracy-theorist describes United States history as founded by two parallel forces, one, the Christian, and two, the occult dating back to the 1600s. The god-fearing Christians known as Puritans (pilgrims) came to the New World to seek religious freedom from the Church of England, the Anglican Church. This event paved the way to define the United States as a Christian nation, but other groups settled that weren’t Christians. These groups were deep in Masonic secrecy, deep in esoteric teachings; this included the forefathers, and during the time of the declaration, those people were involved in Masonry; however, at the same time, most of them were also Christians.

There is romanticism portraying pilgrims as colonialists who broke away from tyranny. The lives of those Puritans in the New World were harsh, with a high death rate and consuming evil – that can only be likened to the kinds of evils that Christian conspiracy truthers label satanic.   

Theocratic Empire vs. Theocratic Empire: The quest for New Jerusalem and its mandate for heaven on earth is a rope in a tug of war played by two opposing factions [… well, that’s what we are led to believe] between modern crusaders and right-centric-middle-United-States with their religious supporters; protestant/evangelicals/Zionism – against the Vatican who wishes to seize control of the old city of Jerusalem out of the clutches of the State of Israel. This is history repeating itself with different variations on the fundamentalist aspect of that purpose.

Constantine’s intention to save the Roman Empire through Christianity brought Western Europe into the Dark Ages. Constantine’s change of faith was shocking at the time, and spiritual visions were behind the reason for that change. At first, Constantine was a sun-god believer; he saw himself in the image of Apollo. Many visions inspired his conversion from Polytheism to Christianity. Constantine saw a cross-shaped trophy formed from light resting above the sun, and attached to it was the word ‘by this conquer.’ The symbol was the Chi-Rho symbol. He also claimed Apollo came to him in a vision and prophesied he would live a long life and rule the world. Romans often associate Apollo with the sun and even identify Apollo with Sol-Invictus. Many coins depict the Sun-god; some coins depict Constantine standing beside the sun-God. He believed in a more syncretized version of the Christian g/God as a solar god. Something else must have changed his mind so drastically; maybe it’s akin to what Christians call born again. So, he tied that vision of Apollo to Jesus. Constantine’s conversion to Christianity didn’t come in an instant but a gradual process throughout that era.

Constantine had a complicated relationship with traditionalists; he ordered the destruction of Pagan temples and transferred money from those temples into his government. At the same time, he set up Pagan statues of the sun-god sol-Invictus – and he associated himself with Neo-Platonist philosophers. He was a savvy politician who needed to work with the imperial bureaucracy, which was primarily pagan, without alienating them. The conversion meant a gradual change. What he did in the name of Christianity seemed more in tune with a tyrant king [murder and war] than a Christian by today’s standards. Over time, pagan-gods depictions disappeared through his coinage, and he became a henotheist for Jesus Christ and Christianity.

Catholic-Christianity is under threat by right-wing propaganda like online Right-wing journalist sites like ‘Trumpet.com’ which promoted the ‘all roads lead to Rome’ conspiracy theory by focusing on the testimonial of Cardinal Bea corresponding to Alberto Rivera – a supposed Jesuit who defected to Protestant-Fundamentalism. Rivera’s credibility is questioned; his Status as a Catholic priest turned out to be false, nor was he a Bishop. Most of Phelps’s Conspiratorial claims come from Rivera’s allegations towards Catholicism that the Jesuits are a monolithic Cabal responsible for communism Nazism – the world wars, the assassination of Lincoln and Kennedy – the masterminds of the medieval Inquisition, and so forth.

Take what you will from this – it seems evident upon an either/or extremes, but an all-encompassing monolithic Cabal built upon by guilt through association is not research. They are creating more work for other researchers who must parse most of these false claims. If it’s about guilt by association, both parties are to blame, considering both interlocks with the Rothschilds. At one stage, the Pope borrowed money from the Rothschilds:          

Researcher Eustace Mullins writes that the Rothschilds took over all the financial operations of the worldwide Catholic Church in 1823. Today the large banking and financial business of the Catholic Church is an extensive system interlocked with the Rothschilds and the rest of the International Banking system. (Top 13 Illuminati Bloodlines, p.154)

.

At the same time, there is Rothschild-Zionism [a David Icke term] that implies Zionism is corporate-funded by the Rothschilds. Zionism is favoured by religious and political leaders coming from Protestant/Evangelical denominations of the United States. From which they’re also under the thumb of higher banking corporations – hence the name Rothschild-Zionism. As well as other higher corporate powers of Europe – this means right-centric Christian conspiracy groups must accept that those they follow as their spokesperson for their conservative ideal follow ideas of the external world – and not so much so for their separatist ideals and paranoia. These external ideals are technocratic based, aiming to hyper-specialise technologies.

The supposed testimonial of Cardinal Bea corresponding to Dr. Rivera outlined what he heard through secret briefings. A Jesuit named Augustina Bea showed how desperately the Roman Catholics wanted Jerusalem at the end of the third century. Because of its religious history and strategic location, the Holy City was considered a priceless treasure. A scheme had to be developed to make Jerusalem a Roman Catholic city. So the Catholic Church or the Vatican wanted the city of Jerusalem because they knew how much spiritual significance the city is; Jerusalem is also known as heaven from Galatians 4:26: “But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.” This spiritual significance is said to be the driving force for the creation of Islam. So, the Romans once possessed the city, but during its fall, it was taken over by heathens, so they made a plan (the creation of Islam) to take that land back. What Cardinal Bea shared in the Vatican was evidence (writings) that linked the Vatican to the creation of Islam, in which Rivera was present. Rivera wanted to defect from the Church, and the Church, knowing how much he knew, was aware of such information being exposed. According to Phelps, the Vatican also helped finance the building of these massive Islamic armies in exchange for three favours: 1. Eliminate the Jews and Christians (true believers, they’re called infidels) – 2. Protect the Augustinian Monks and Roman Catholics – 3. Conquer Jerusalem for “His Holiness” in the Vatican. Phelps says the Jesuits (Papacy) created Islam in 610 to put forward Islam as a sort of Church, and that is why Islam killed the racial Jews alongside Christians in Arabia and North Africa. This spread throughout Spain, where Muslims (Islam) were used to neutralise the Visigoths in Spain and southern France, who denied Rome as a pagan trinity (I.H.S – I-Isis, H-Horus, and S-Set). There was a time when Islam denied the Papacy; this was during the time Islam refused to give it back to the Pope. The Pope helping to finance Islam’s undertaking was not pleased, so the crusades occurred by the order of the Vatican. According to Phelps, the Masonic lodge in Cairo is the Islamic Brotherhood’s central point; therefore, whoever rules Cairo rules the Muslim Brotherhood.

.

So many of these contentions from Revera/Phelps are an exercise in revisionist history, making most of the claims (if not all) untrue [its conspiracy-theory-propaganda]. Islam arose in the Arabian Peninsula, where Orthodox Christianity had made significant gains among the population, with Gnostic Christianity also having a significant presence during the seventh century. The Catholic Church was based in Rome and was insulated mainly from the Arabian people. In a broader sense, Christianity contributed immensely to Islamic theology but did not create Islam.

The Catholic Church did support [charted] the crusade and sometimes directed it; as for creating it, this is not true. After the fall of Rome, an Islamic Campaign spread in North Africa and reached northern Spain. They would fill the vacuum left by the collapse of the Roman Empire. Charlemagne united Europe by consolidating Germanic central European kingdoms, becoming known as the ‘Holy Roman Empire’ under the Roman Church. Charlemagne’s empire met resistance from the Saxons, who fought against the state and made a new Christianity in favour of their native gods. Pope Urban II called for a crusade against the Islamic occupation of Jerusalem, thus the first crusade. 

The Crusade was led by the Knights Templar, a military order founded by several European noblemen. Their initial purpose was to protect pilgrims travelling to the Holy Land. They were given properties to serve as headquarters, one of which was located at the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. The Knights Templar existed from the late 11th century until the early 14th century and was respected as a formidable military force. As the Crusades waned, the Knights Templar returned to Europe and took possession of properties known as preceptories. This designation allowed them to operate businesses similar to sovereign states, answerable only to the Pope. They leveraged this unique position to establish one of the first banking systems, managing the wealth of pilgrims and others. Over the years, the Knights Templar amassed significant wealth and power.

So much so that some countries owed them money, like King Philip of France; Philip influenced the papacy and the Vatican and persuaded them to move their headquarters from Rome to Avion, France. He [Philip] was concerned about the Templars and once asked to join but was rejected. People started to wonder how they became such power – they did not realise it was a banking system [the way currency works], a new concept and something they didn’t understand at the time. So, they thought it was something magical or supernatural because of rumours that entailed satanic rituals among the secret initiation ranks. Philip sent people to confirm these rumours, and these spies confirmed them. Philip then used this as evidence to get the Pope involved in prosecuting the people of that order. Some were arrested and executed, burnt and jailed – some absorbed to other orders.      

From this point onward, the Templars become mythological in two central beliefs. The first is the idea of world domination, often linked to conspiracy theories about a new world order and Freemasonic connections, which emerged after the Catholic Church accused them of various wrongdoings. The second belief revolves around the notion that when the Templars were dissolved, they were wrongly persecuted and viewed as wise initiates who possessed the secrets of Western occultism. This perspective led various secret societies to claim ties to the Templar legacy and to continue their traditions. The Church concluded that the Templars engaged in satanic rituals based on confessions obtained through torture. During these confessions, the Templars admitted to worshipping the Baphomet. Additionally, the Vatican’s investigations, which did not involve torture, revealed confessions of other rituals that involved a denial of Christ, though they were not characterised as overtly satanic.

The Baphomet image that people commonly see it as is an image designed by [French] Alphonse Louis Constant, but those images had nothing to do with the Templars – or even in the same timeline as the symbolic representation of the Baphomet back in the days of that Order. Nobody quite knew what the Baphomet was; some have said it was a skull with multiple heads; some say it was the skull of John the Baptist. In this case, the Baphomet was a severed head through which the Baphomet would speak. Although it was more of a ritual where they take a severed head and embalm it – then they would put it on a plate. Then they would insert magical symbols on the tongue – to which it would reanimate itself to life – in which it would speak. The Baphomet is a demonic entity used through divination for prophetic insight and gain.   

This plays on the fears of traditional Christians; I can see why; it has all the perversity of evil, and the secret Order that was/is Templars certainly fits that bill. However, they must also realise that magic(k) and ritualism are central to all world events and technological advancements. That began in early creation and early civilisations. The motive to gain favour over spiritual entities is universal among all cultures and has a crucial point in mythology. For example, the Watchers fell from Heaven onto Mount Hermon, where they taught the tribes metallurgy and how to read the stars. Then there is the myth of the Greek goddess Medusa; upon having her head cut off by Perseus, her head is still imbued with power, casting any men who stare at her head to stone. There is a commonality of themes [of other-worldly beings giving technology] through the metaphysical and Physical that is bonded to civilisations and their people.

The Medusa plays on a psychological key point, portrayed through the example of a sci-fi show, Taken, which is a dialogue between Dr. Chet and Camille. The Doctor is trying to talk her down from becoming overly obsessive. If Skully had deep psychological issues, Camille would be an anti-matter version of Agent Skully [of the X-Files] character. 

		Dr.  Chet	Do you know the story of the Medusa?
		Camille	You look at her and you turn to stone
		Dr. Chet	Unless you know the secret, but you have to be an enlightened warrior to learn.
		Camille	This is going somewhere right?
		Dr. Chet	If you know the secret you can kill her, and then the winged horse Pegasus flies from her head, then the world becomes a  very, very beautiful place. I use to think we get something out of this ‘new science’, something, I even thought we can get the better of them somehow, but we’re not ready to be anything but spectators in this – anything more … ‘stone.’

.

In 2001, a document discovered in the Vatican revealed that the Church had investigated the Inquisition. This investigation found that the Inquisition did not involve torture. The cardinals interviewed the same Templar groups that confessed during France’s Inquisition. Ultimately, this investigation showed that the Templars were innocent and should have been absolved. However, this conclusion held little genuine significance, and the Templars still faced punishment. The findings served mainly to help the Vatican distance itself from any association with what was perceived as an essentially satanic order. Until then, the public believed that the Church had created this group, allowing it to gain total power and operate unchecked. This led the Templars to evolve into a secret faction seeking world dominance.

It is argued that the Church’s granting of absolution was part of its criteria for allowing confession, in which sins are pardoned through penance. This absolution or forgiveness, however, does not imply that the individuals in these orders were not guilty of the crimes they confessed to. This situation reveals a vast, insidious conspiracy, along with a denial of Christ, which goes against the teachings of the Church.

So it’s good to know where the distinction of interpretation is coming from; Phelps is taking the path of the first mythicized version of the story. That is, the Church is responsible for the rise of the secret order or for having created it, which is not the case, though you cannot deny the Church’s involvement. So here we have the Church detaching themselves [or washing away their hands of guilt] from a secret group that grew too large and unchecked.

We also have a form of detachment in the personalities of fundamentalists, where they wish Protestantism didn’t come from the Catholic Church. Protestantism gestated from the dimensional state of heaven that arose at the start of creation in a collective fantasy wish where the world has forgotten Martin Luther. Revera is a modern-day Lutheran, acting as a mirror to Luther. Still, instead of being the father of Protestantism, Revera is a sympathiser for Protestantism/anti-Catholic activists as well as a hoax actor during the sixties.

Trying to consolidate a monolithic big bad would also mean consolidating secret societies, which is impossible. Secret societies have existed throughout the ages, from the first agricultural ages to modern times. This is not only ambitious but impossible given the nature of secret societies, which sometimes are transient and have their own ideologies and belief structures. This means some groups change, some get disembowelled or reconstituted to another group, and the name changes slightly.

The Element Encyclopedia of Secret Societies is 400 pages book outlining secret societies from A to Z. Paraphrasing a segment of the book:

The Christian right has always been a racial radical movement that broke away from American Protestantism, then trickled down to become The Christian Identity movement which was a British Israelite movement as well. With the emergence of other churches to their cult it started to become anti-Semitic, then it found common cause with another fringe group “the two seeds” which gave the notion of two dividing bloodline; the evil bloodline from Cain and the good bloodline from Seth whose father was Adam. This became popular in the south; than the Christian Identity movement claimed they are the Aryans (white skin) and were the original true Israelites and that Jews were biological descendants of Satan. After a while they formed a secret group, togo against or revolutionize against the so-called “Zionist Occupation government” they failed and they reconsidered their plans for racial warfare. During the last decades of the 20th century they spread the racist paganism and neo-Nazi ideology, which drew many potential recruits away from Christian Identity movement. It remains a force in the extreme right of America that overlaps with neo-Nazi groups and surviving branches Ku Klux Klan. – The Element Encyclopedia of Secret Societies

.

So even amongst their ranks, there are more contexts to know than fully accepting a simplified, almost fictional telling to promote doubt. So, something happened to change the ideals of racial/racist groups in early Middle America; to change their ideals from hating Zionism to accepting Zionism, probably by preachers with political alliances who can fill stadium stages akin to musical bands, though it’s still a very racist group. It’s a political movement more so than a religious one.  

Protestantism is relatively young compared to the history of the Jesuits and the Catholic Church. Furthermore, calling the Copernican worldview scientism oversimplifies an institution that traces its roots back to the New Testament, highlighting a significant lack of historical context and memory. It is misleading to suggest that the Jesuits were responsible for the medieval Inquisition in the 13th century, mainly since their foundation began in 1539. Acknowledging these discrepancies must be met. Throughout history, yes, the Roman Catholic Church and the Jesuits have been guilty of various wrongdoings. However, should they be held accountable for what right-leaning conspiracy theorists describe as a central cabal, or is this merely a product of empire-building?

Regarding memory and context, the Catholic Church [Vatican] and Rome have already experienced a theocratic empire. It’s part of their memory and history. This is memory as shared knowledge [common sense] that they’ve learned from. They know it didn’t work then and know it won’t work now.

Constantine’s ideal for Christianity would follow through with the Crusade. The Christian ideal was through the ideal of a New Jerusalem. However, the city never came down from the clouds and certainly didn’t save Europe from disease and death in the wake of the fall of Rome. And if there is a lesson to be learned from history – it’s not to repeat it; the same outcome will ensue. The end-times notion won’t end – it’s akin to believing there is a restaurant at the end of the universe – makes the mission for a New Jerusalem a never-ending quest. They’ve already had several wars in the Middle East on the backs of that premise.

The mandate for heaven has cosmic significance in the sense that one party is on a mission to preserve a new (g)/God born out of its detachment from the monad [this is called the Lucifer Effect, a term borrowed from the New Age]. This is where an over-focus on individualism detached from oneness becomes chronic or alienated, isolated, jealous that usually act out its evils. On an environmental level, industries extract from the world till nothing is left. Not realising the earth gives without asking for anything in return. They forget that you need to live with the environment on a symbiotic level. The Protestant’s separation from the Catholic Church is a symbolic detachment from that monad – its effect is a reaction to seek validation, but they don’t know where to seek it since they cut themselves off.

On the surface, Catholics and Protestants both claim to be Christian, and both adhere to a lot of common fundamental ideas about Jesus, which suggests they are both a sort of Christian. However, those that look beyond the surface see another game being played. There is an awareness surrounding the old gods awakening and a state-cult re-emerging, and given our modern circumstances, this seems to be the case. [Well … at least symbolically]. The antithesis to this claim is a clear agenda by the protestant groups that have the drive to go back to a theocratic age. This is made clear by their Christian- groups who promote an Elizabethan Freemasonic big bad but cannot mention their clear support for their government’s religious/political quest for a New Jerusalem backed by their corporations and, therefore, support for militaristic order. Not realizing that Freemasons were primarily seen as [predominantly] protestant, the Protestant Knighthood.

Lucifer Effect syndrome would repeat itself in early Protestant denominations /orders [like Calvinists] thinkers akin to info-war types, but in the Enlightenment era, realised the Catholic Church professed Christianity in public but instinctively knew they practised/worshipped other idols in private. Those inherent memories have never left that detached group but moved towards modern times as they re-emerged in the mindset of the religious right of the 80s. However, back then, the dichotomy was apparent. I surmise they were simulated back into Protestantism/Evangelicalism rather than fading away. This explains the modern-day political landscape where there are no dichotomies to be had; both left and right politics are right-wing.    

The populace groups who are pro-militaristic/Zionist/conservative and their conspiracy-theory-propaganda followers have a sense of patriotism against a theoretical-conspiratorial notion of threat; Satanism, World War Three, and so on – while still keeping their support for a New Jerusalem. I feel their spokespersons are catering to their separatist followers with an absolute notion of the genuineness of their deity, which is pretty much defunct by now; he is real, but not in the sense they think he is. They’re appealing to their exclusive nature toward their g/God. While secretly worshipped another, much in the same way that an intuitive feeling leads to the conclusion – that early protestant groups/orders felt that the Catholic Church professed Christianity but practised another in secret. There is no real difference between Catholic Christians and Protestant Christians who are being duped. 

Secret worship of gods in private while advocating a monotheistic one in public has political connotations. Set aside the eschatological notion of a New Jerusalem and consider perhaps that narrative is more for the benefit of their Christian populace – when in private or secret, it’s more about power. Then, it’s about the Empire building that goes beyond living up to revelations.

Take the dichotomy of China and the U.S.; both are more similar than one might think. China is more capitalistic [on the extreme] than socialist – the modern system has no support [safety net] for what the West understands as socialist systems [policies; Medicare, welfare, education, etc.] to be. I’ve already mentioned the U.S.’s ever-prevailing encroachment to fascism. China is a sliding scale between Capitalism and Communism, while the U.S. is a sliding scale of Capitalism and Fascism. China attributes socialism by wearing a socialist hat, meaning it looks like a socialist country, but in reality, modern-day China is unrecognizable. The threat comes in their managerial systems of control, which no one in the West wishes or wants to live in. At least the West has a simulation of choice. Now and then, there is a show trial of corrupt officials that get put in jail or the death penalty – to show people they’re taking on corruption for the benefit of the public – while in secret, doing nothing to the majority of other officials.

In the last post, we briefly discussed Vitvan’s General Semantics and the importance of avoiding words and images that lack proper referents or references. We should neither elevate images to the point of idolatry nor dismiss them entirely to the point of heresy. This concept can be challenging to grasp, especially since Terence McKenna’s understanding of the universe is deeply rooted in language. A clearer way to approach this is to distinguish between applied imagination and imaginative fantasy.

The fundamental Jewish belief that one should “make no graven images” is central to their faith and is reflected in their religious texts and the Bible. The Jewish belief emphasises that no false images of God should be worshipped. In contrast, the Romans required statues of their emperors alongside their gods. The Jewish people understood that statues held no real value, whereas holy texts do.

The Jesuits used the same concept of heightening God’s image when it was merely a cover for their politics (- Simulation and Simulacra). The disappearance of God was a way to manipulate the consciousness of the public as they took the role of inheritor or steward of the Godhead.      

The image will play a part in whether old gods awaken and are worshipped secretly. Maybe there is no awakening or re-emergence if we know people are astute enough to see through [the abstraction of the God-image being brought forward that can parallel their self among the images and representation of that God-image, but for already enacting his death and his disappearance through the catalogue of his representations (- Simulation and Simulacra)] – while at the same time being aware that it’s dangerous to deconstruct images since it shines a light on the high probability that there is nothing behind them. Since there are no proper referents/inferences to the image, the implication of wavering meaning to the image is that it becomes stagnant. Any order deep within its occult history and practice can assimilate a simulated meaning or referent to the image.

Then, it’s just about ethical principles of good and evil. And the paranoid fundamentalists fear what they don’t understand or refuse to understand, [old gods awakening; to be afraid or not to be afraid] is directly in response or a reaction to a misinterpreted or misunderstood redeemer. Fundamentalist-right recognizes that people having that awareness means a slow apotheosis will not fall in their favour. Their drive and lack of openness for truth will undoubtedly fuel more hate. A state-cult guise as Christianity is not apparent, nor more so than a state-cult guise as a right-wing Christianity, but I fear this is too straightforward to be unassailable. It can disregard the genuine believers of Catholicism. History cannot ignore several centuries and more of history, memory, and context t; to do so would mean devaluing Catholicism.

Most Christian principles people enact come from first-century (Roman and Grecian) philosophers Epictetus and Seneca. They knew about the ancient past and were deeply connected to the higher schools of consciousness. Christianity is paganism with a different name: a sun god turned into a Jewish man. It is said the Flavians created much of what is known as Christianity.

The Dead Sea Scrolls indicate that the characters in those writings were militaristic and wanted to push the foreigners out of Israel; comparatively, in the gospel, the same characters were pacifistic. How did a movement like Christianity come to exist in a region that was occupied by Roman soldiers and Jewish zealots who wanted to push the Romans out?          

Modern separatist groups’ sense of patriotism is based on false pride. Also, there is an inherent need, helped by preachers who reinforce a New Jerusalem. Even if they’re shown their hypocrisy, for instance, Ezekiel once channelled God, and God told him to build a representation of Jerusalem and then do a ritual with it—which will cause the (New) Jerusalem to fall from the Heavens. Magic and rituals are always looked down on. How can they reconcile that?

This [populace group] are separatists that ignore the fact that their (political) leaders are controlled by billionaires – who agree on wars for empire, aggressive of the police, false dichotomy, divide, and rule politics. And I would venture to guess that they don’t worship the same God as the separatists do, but somehow, the separatists can forgive that or look the other way, or it’s just plain ignorance. They forever continue to propagandize their agenda. In actuality, it’s a group of elites who play both sides.

The most dogmatic Christians would not even entertain this possibility. Often, these groups don’t realise their government has used them and that the government uses Christianity’s good principles against them by preaching to the Evangelical population that war and the end times coincide, and so make them believe in their war effort as something virtuous. The greater Israel project, in which a theocratic empire is all but too happy to capitulate to any Israel needs. 

.

.

Flat Earth; Enclosed Creationism; Conspiracy (Theory), Intuition and Imagination – Part Twelve- Final

.

.

---

.

The Only Way Out is In [Posted initially on 27th March 2021]: In the last post, we discussed sacred and profane space and touched upon transcending duality and the mysteries of mystic space. This will be a continuation of what we call hyperreal-space [what we come to believe as the container that holds our satellized earth in its place] – compared to what I call space-real [can be seen as spatial concepts that illustration artists are familiar with]. And the transcendence of duality is about recognising that what we call hyperreal space is also what’s inside you. 

The secular worldview scientism and traditional-Christians [traditional-Christians are secular in many ways because, for the most part, they do believe in the hyperreal space as well as Evolution. The Theistic sect makes up much of the population that agrees with the secular viewpoint. They somehow manage to keep their religious faith alongside a dominant secular system. The debate surrounding subjects Atheism’s big bang that it came out of nothing – to the Theistic notion that there has to be a God for the possibility for something to come out of nothing vis-vee, the Big Bang. It seems to be a meaningless argument between two ultimately secular groups; the only underlying difference concerns details about the centre.

Then, an offset dialectical argument came after that and headed towards an argument between scientism and enclosed-creationism. One group [enclosed-creationists] identifies the hyperreal space as this abstraction of space, but it is predominantly more of a projection of the physical world. In the same way, we project measurements like the lines of latitude and longitude. They would view time as divisions like hours, minutes, and seconds, the world as a dial-in clock that measures change upon the result of the two changing processes. The changing process of the clock is similar to the changing process of distance; through this relationship, you get time. With this ability to measure distances, you get the concept of space. Apply this to the hyperreal space, and you get a mixed idea of something we know is fundamental with a hyperreal abstraction. The force that has brought us to this moment is rooted in the idea that hyperreal space does not exist; it is either absent or represents something different. This concept of an abstract “no-space” emerges from the drive toward discovering something beyond ourselves. That “something” is the infinite unknown, and since it is ultimately unattainable, we are left with no choice but to turn inward.

A Chinese text called the ‘platform sutra’ contributed to the sixth patriarch of Zen Buddhism; there is a passage where it says the mind is like the emptiness of space, and if you want to realise this, don’t exclude everything from your mind. So, if space contains everything, one must understand to empty the mind by making the mind small instead of great. So, separating the space between what it contains and what it holds causes suspicion to arise. Seeing this relationship as one entity equals out, nobody can see a shape without anything.

So, space is also ‘you’. Space is your consciousness, which acts as an infinite permeable continuum. ‘Space’ as a notion of a second heaven before the first, sort of a pre-nirvana, bears more truth. Or be it a metaphysical notion, so the conquest of space is the conquest of non-existent in an ethereal sense. The duality of polar thinking, of “being and non-being”, as mentioned by (Alan Watts) describes the world as ‘existence’ and space as ‘non-existent.’

We cannot measure ‘space’ (not the hyperreal space, and not the distance between two hyperreal points), the space within the walls of time, the ‘wall’ being the firmament. Time described within our magnetic field, and by association, ‘space’ is now an antithesis of the hyperreal, a ‘space-real’. The layer that gives the sun and moon buoyancy is hyperreal, and below this layer is what we call a ‘thing’, ‘stuff’, ‘material’, and linear time. What is in space is considered reality, and at the same time, space is something that is not there. Much like how we view the world through our eyes (optics), the eyes are receptive to specific vibrations of light, and therefore, where certain vibrations are not transmitted, the nerve ends are not stimulated and don’t receive stimuli. So this denial of stimuli is … ‘space’… we call it darkness. So, this ‘space-real’ is an interval between the real and the non-real. The law of the universe postulates vibrations and impulses that determine our material world, and if you saw this ‘space-real’ through the physical and not the spiritual (one comes to mind; he goes by the name of Enoch), you wouldn’t be able to make out the individual outlines which require this non-being interval for their being to be realised or outlined. So, to see the outline being, you must have the intervening space of the non-being, but non-being in this example means lacking stimulation of whatever perceiving instrument you are using. Hyperreal space (and space-real) can be something of a different order than ordinary.

Hermetic philosophy can explain the concept of space-real (in contrast to hyperreal-space). Hermeticism is rooted in the Hermetic Corpus, a collection of writings essentially lost following the fall of the Roman Empire. Christian Barbarians destroyed many texts, but monasteries from Syria saved some of them. The contents of the corpus date back before the pre-Copernican/Galileo era. Their influences and later ideologies could not distort the Corpus’s real meaning. As exemplified below, these three passages from the Hermetic Corpus offer insights into the nature of imagination, our planes of existence, and the relationship between space and spirit.

	The imagination: [transcribed from Terence McKenna quoting Hermetic Corpus lecture] If then you do not make yourself equal to god, you cannot apprehend god. For like is known by like. Make yourself grow to alike expanse, and leap clear of all that is corporeal. Rise above all time and become eternal then you will apprehend god, think that for you nothing is impossible, deem that you to are immortal, and that you are able to grasp all things in your thought. To know every craft and every science, find your home in the haunts of every living creature, make yourself higher than all heights and lower than all depths, bring together in yourself all opposites of quality, heat and cold, dryness and fluidity, think that you are everywhere at once at land at sea, in heaven, think that you are not yet begotten that you are in the womb that you are young that you are old that you have died, you’re in the world beyond the grave, grasp in your thought all this at once, all times and places and substances and qualities, magnitudes together, then you can apprehend God, but if you shut up your soul and your body and abase yourself and say I know nothing, I can do nothing, am afraid of earth and sea, I cannot mount to heaven, I cannot, I know not what I was or what I shall be, then what have you to do with god!! You’re thought can grasp nothing that is good and you cleave to the body and are evil. (Book 9 Corpus, Hermetica – Scott translation)
	The space: [not real title] Would that it would be possible for you to grow wings and sore into the air posed between earth and heaven you might see the solid earth, the fluid sea and streaming rivers, the wondering air the penetrating fire, the courses of the stars and the swiftness of the movement in which heavens encompasses all. What happiness is that my son, to sell all this born along with one impulse and to behold him who is unmoved, moving all that moves, and him who is hidden made manifest through his works.
	The mind and the (space) celestials: [not real title] But he, who, presents all things to us through our senses and there by manifest himself through all things and in all things, and especially to those to whom he wills to manifest himself. Begin then my son taught with a prayer to the lord and father who alone is good pray that you may find favour with him and that one ray of him if only one, may flash into your mind so that you may have power to grasp and thought that mighty being. For thought alone can see that, which is hidden in as much as thought itself is hidden from sight and even the thought, which is within you is hidden from your sight. How can he …being in himself be manifest to you through your bodily eyes, but if you have power to see with the eyes of the mind, then my son, he will manifest himself to you. For the lord manifest himself ungrudgingly too through all the universe, and you can behold god’s image with your eyes and lay hold on it with your hands, if you wish to see him think on the sun, think on the course of the moon, think on the order of the stars. Who is it that maintains that order the sun is the greatest of the gods in heaven to him as to their king and overlord and all the kings of heaven yield place and yet this mighty god greater than earth and see submits to having smaller stars circling above him. Who is it than my son that he always obeys with reverence and owe, each of these stars too is confide by measured limits and has an appointed space to range in. Why do not all the stars in heaven run like or equal courses, who is it that is assigned to each its place and marked out for each the extent of its course … (and so forth).

.

Thoughts and symbols go hand in hand. The togetherness of thought and symbols constitute what we experience within the physical and spiritual world through our senses – but upon realising, the physical world is the same as the spiritual. The physical must not be confused with the symbolic, although there is no real difference as it stems from one energy. Realising that we are all energies stemming from one source is a relief, and it dissolves all your problems; problems concerning the meta-physical are absolved. On the other hand, localised issues still arise in the practical physical world.

During the renaissance period there were many heterodoxy groups in Europe that had links to the late Roman period and partially survived through the dark ages. You have Neo-Platonists (a group of philosophers in the 3rd and 4th century, Platonist, etc.) they took Plato and turned his teachings into to a mystical doctrine of emanation – by taking the notion of the one or the unnameable or Brahman and so forth. Then they would have a serious of declensions into a more material and multiple view of expressions of being, and so became known as Neo-Platonist-Emanationists.   There theories on how the universe was constructed have become the unconscious bases of late magical speculation. They brought in the archetypal image of angels, for the purpose of making people recognise a hierarchy of being, upon doing that they had to compete with the archetypal image of stellar demons. That came from paganism; which is about bringing the powers of the stars down to earth, through sympathetic magic, by setting up resonance through rituals and by doing this relates them within one’s intention. Which tend to be intuitively linked to creativity and artistry.   Through this renaissance period of exploration of angel magic soon turned into demonic conjuration. This superstition obsession went on through the 16th century, alchemy, conjuration, telesmatic magic, and sympathetic magic are all prelude to modern science, and so therefore science [more so satellized astrology] is essentially a demonic enterprise. The only difference being is in the name ‘magic’ to that of ‘science’ for a modern secular definition, all stemming from the notion of turning led into gold, (which is a false image of the meaning of alchemy), but it is in the understanding of that process …to change matter …and to define science as magic is warranted. (McKenna, T, audio lecture)

.

Giordano Bruno, a Franciscan monk, was burnt at the stake for his heretic ideas, those ideas being stars are suns. This moment in time, when people’s worldview was about angels and demons, was outraged by this new notion. In this single moment, he slowly turned the universe into an infinite paradigm, going against Aristotle so the church wouldn’t have it, so they put him to death. Of course, Copernicus did the math and established the solar systems. However, Bruno came up with the idea that stars are suns during a drug-induced night, where his thoughts and moments of clarity were astute. It’s disconcerting that people back then, the entire cosmological worldview was about to be uplifted and become satellized – were brought about in a drug high. Bruno’s other works are about the geometry of language and not his co-partnership with Copernicus. Also, be reminded not to take free thought/speech for granted. Copernicus was a magician in the sense he changed the alchemical mindset of people from an attuned perspective to an infinite satellization concept. Conjuring images with false referents as their evidence for science, not realising magic is really at play.

Hermetica attributes humanity as the brother of god while also adhering to the notion that humanity is not tainted by original sin. Further layered by Marcello Pachino’s ß quote, “Man is the measure of all things”, this single quote took all that guilt away and made godhead out of man; this open-door ideology brought in abuse. Fostered by the recognition of a misunderstanding of dates – Hermes wrote the text that was not written at the time of Moses but more recently during the Hellenistic era. They thought the Romans revised the ancient text and concluded that it was not a post-Christian text due to the text not being older than it was. And this paved the way for another ideology to come in and imprint their doctrine. This imprint took form in ‘thought’ as a pathological ego-mind virus using the scientific process as a cover for their unmeasured theories, and it took form in science and prevailed as the scientism of today. So, it was swapping out of something old to something new, and what was used to reinforce that belief was through worship of images, from solar-gods deities to solar heliocentric balls.

In Vitvan’s General Semantics, he outlines the importance of not using Words/Images for which any proper referent or reference has been established. And all sages condemn approaching the understanding of nature or the ground of being through an image. And if you wish to perceive it correctly, you must not have an image of it because having an image of it will set you up for idolatry – but don’t deny to an extent it becomes compulsive that it becomes iconoclasm. When we start hating [or disbelieving] specific images, we’re still attached to them somehow. It is not wrong to make an image but to set yourself apart from it and to realise and experience the ground of being – you need to be free from images. You need to suspend the activity of thinking; there is a lot more to thinking and direct apprehension of the world, an unmediated concept of thoughts; this kind of apprehension needs to be understood to understand ‘space’.

Alan Watts’s notion of the inner space, with the notion of space-real, and the hermetic notion of space with the spiritual and the imagination, along with Bruno’s now-debunked stars, are suns. What exactly are stars if it is not the satellized version of the sun? One can only speculate, and by speculating and putting false referents to it, it’s always good to put a disclaimer. In saying that, stars are possibly a multi-dimensional aberration—the application of infinity to this possibility.

An ideal that moves to another similar idea backed by iconoclasm images implores modes of sincerity towards truth. Only upon revelation does it not adhere to the quality and relationship that can function as experience or states of consciousness, so it becomes invalid. As an example, the whole solar system is an abstraction, and if you look at the moon and see clouds behind it, this is a point of reference in which you can determine a false referent image imprinted onto you. If the moon is indeed 384,500km, clouds cannot move behind the moon, and yet it does. There are no actual pictures of Earth; what you get instead are rendered or animated images and depictions.

Many fundamentalist flat earthers have rejected the images from scientism’s satellization-cosmology. They’re adopting a secular style of war against images, their type of iconoclasm. At the same time, they cannot see their conformity towards religious images that seem to be stuck aesthetically in a renascence period, notably about Enoch, the great-grandfather of Noah, who was raised above the heavens and walked with God and did so without suffering death. This would undoubtedly conjure images of God as a bearded older man in the sky – because the only way to comprehend Enoch’s invitation to God [Enoch not having died] would be through literal personification. This puts a false referent image of God. This is a conformist example, which would also lead to the support of biblical futurism and a theocratic agenda.

Remember that Christianity in the middle ages had already undergone an Imperial theocracy through Constantine and Theodosius’ reign. And this impacted the peoples of Western Europe to centuries of abject poverty, ignorance, plague, and serfdom. Intellectuals such as Will Duran, author of Caesar and Christ, describe Constantine’s intention to save the Roman Empire through Christianity as what brought Western Europe into the Dark Ages. Durant denotes Edward Gibbon; “Christ’s victory had been Rome’s Death.” [More on this later]

The Dialectical Game of the Inward Path: The pop-culture scene (and the esoteric truther scene) has various inclusive qualities towards the media’s meta-morphing of opposites. It’s almost inherent (or even natural) at this point. There is also a more profound underlying game, for instance, how pop culture is a form of magic. However, it is not magic that employs initiations, rituals, and practices; it is a form of activation in which art/symbols affect the flow of reality. Sheldrake’s notions of long-term memory (as well as consciousness, will, and awareness) being stored somewhere else other than our brains, but rather, our brains are tuning devices that can access those memories from what he calls the God-verse (or the unnamable Dao), he calls this process; morphic resonance.

Therefore, this theory, coupled with creativity within its imaginative process, plays a role as well – if our brain is like tuning devices that tune into the resonance – this resonance is also broadcasting its frequencies much like a radio station. Then, some have higher frequencies to capture those broadcasts; within this type of awareness, things start to happen; coincidences, thoughts, ideas, and synchronicities are more abound and not exclusive to one. Therefore, shared dreams/thoughts/ideas/synchronicities are no longer an aspect of one individual but a collective.

Archaic symbols are being inserted into our technological matrix and transforming our reality. The more technologically advanced we become, the more these atavistic echoes reverberate. It reflects an ongoing process of revelation that many people are trying to manipulate and harness, but no one yet seems to understand. These aren’t just symbols we’ve been looking at; these are neural triggers that often seem to take on a life of their own once they are set loose in the meme stream. 

The game in which the Established elites are playing is negative, but they’re essentially playing the same game as everyone else (according to Grant Morrison), which is the game of finding out ‘who we are’. And ‘why are we here? Looking back at history, it would seem they had a hand in shaping the outcome and further enforcing their manufactured simulation of the future; what they couldn’t get their hands on due to its Meta relationship with Man is that history is pulled from something that is continuously trying to mirror itself in us. This is the force of progress, imagination, and intuition; we have a relationship with something […] we are trying to imitate something with myth, religion, technology, and so forth.

What the elites try to do is connect to it through their technology (for example, the trans-humanism agenda), through magic(k) rituals and occult knowledge, and make you believe that it is entirely exclusive when it’s a game of free-for-all. (Fundamentalist Christians help this exclusivity as they help portray something that is inherently in nature that can be described as mystical to something demonic). That something […] is always trying to connect with the mind and pull itself out through Man. Man encapsulates this in language and symbols to make an image of the unspeakable. What some might call the transcendental object, and what it casts through history, is the shadow of its immenseness. And this is what is referred to as God, the sacred heart of Jesus, or the philosopher’s stone; it’s all those things and much more.

This unknowable factor is always connected with the mind itself through man; this unnamable Dao is defined through man by his creativity, which has spanned since man became aware. Jason James states that inspired human creativity spanning from the Bible and beyond contains a uniformed cross-referencing coding system that involves iconography, numbers, and ciphers, which is natural and predictive. This is due to coming from a realm that doesn’t have the restrictions we find in three-dimensional space; points of time and space embedded to our system in a higher dimensional system of which we are a quasi-crystal simulacrum of tachyon, particles, and objects can move faster than the speed of light, therefore, exists in a realm that is invisible to man. This kind of intelligence that works with tachyons embeds itself through our media, is predictive, and leaves coded messages and puzzles that must be put together.

The game in modern times plays many sub-divisions but is ultimately one game, one process; this can be illustrated in the game of physical and biological entities of events. Jason Silva, who is a performance philosopher, artist, and film director, states:

To understand is to perceive patterns, of course what this means is the true comprehension comes when the dots are revealed, when you get to the long view and you see the big picture, this is the idea of patterns and recurring patterns with different scales of reality. We’re talking about the mycelial archetype and how the information sharing system gave rise to the internet and how it looks exactly like a computer model of dark matter of the universe that look exactly like the neurons of the brain. They all appear the same inter-twinkle filament structure; it’s the rise of network-isim as big data; aggregate stock systems are looking exactly like natural systems, the more we can measure the more we can visualize, the more it expands our consciousness. I see these recurring patterns that scales our reality, technology is increasingly becoming an expander of our human consciousness, it expands our thought, reach and vision and it reveals so much more. Jeffery West describes cities are like organism, allies are like capillaries, how is possible that man-made, artificial, technological system is behaving like a natural system, the more efficient it becomes the more it starts to look like nature. Steven Johnson says; ‘if we can understand all this stuff anything becomes possible, it’s the adjacent possible standing in a sort of shadow future, a map of all the ways the present can re-event itself.

.

I cannot believe that Jason Silva may be a pro-technocratic follower. This is just speculation on my part. Considering the New Age depends on the simulacrum of heliocentricism, it’s essentially secular, but the New Age gave a bit more of an outlandish narrative [or an inserted fictional component]. Like notions of hyperreal-space galactic federations, aliens from Zeta Reticuli, vibrating crystals, and so on – are also lumped in with subjects with far more significant memory and context, such as Gnosticism, Taoism, Buddhism, etc. We know these consolidations have an effect of simplicity, which puts it in a narrow perspective. This is something fundamentalists like to take advantage of as well.    

It can be challenging in light of not conforming to images with no accurate referent/reference, given a claim that a generated computer model of dark matter can be true. However, it’s no more valid than a computer model of a spherical Earth or the ritual event of the Moon landing. Jason Silva describes the fundamental aspects of the game quite well, and this is the mention of the human game of sub-divisions. This is the social-institution game that is predominately in the realm of the ego. As well as recognising the importance of pattern recognition [or synchronicities].     

Who is then in charge? Someone or something must be. You can view the gnostic esoteric position that the Archons are playing a game with Sophia, and we (humankind) are the players on a stage, with all of us acting as fools. And to break away from that role (or to hear the sound of the bell) is to shatter the vessel – to reach Christ-consciousness (through practice, psychedelics, or just by the grace of God). This fundamental change can be defined as one’s breakaway civilization, a civilization of one, but ultimately many; as you wait for other fools to graduate, you, having graduated, have a different world view, but are not entirely transfixed on an awakened perspective that can blind or polarized truth (whatever that may be).

Having a religious-far-right epistemological filter is a scourge on the truth community (if such a notion of truth community even exists); often, an intuition red alert pops up when you fall into their illusion. When we know all kinds of problems exist, but we always seem to ignore those fundamental problems and instead fall into a deep dialectic war (which is one of Jung’s three processes of experiencing light and dark forces, the other being magic and religion), often people get stuck in a state of war (the conflict between right and left, the morally acceptable and the morally not-acceptable). It becomes an incomplete process without the other two, magic and religion.

Viewing it in a gnostic esoteric position is not entirely safe also, as you have to filter out a growing movement that views itself as gnostic – the rise of the anti-gnostic (hyper-gnostic) that branched out from the truther movement, Christian-millennialism, and so forth. This movement has an inherently gnostic worldview; with its world-denying, everything is an illusion, and everything is a hoax viewpoint; however, simultaneously, it completely denies the fundamental aspect of classical Gnosticism. True Gnosticism doesn’t halter in any way the spirit-meta-experience, which the anti-gnostic does; these often come from Christian groups that deny the experience and instead view such notion as only for the redeemer, which is a misunderstanding of the true gnostic-Christ-redeemer.

And concerning viewing the world as a hoax, a practical joke being played on us is becoming a common truism backed by quantum physics. Quantum physics is a re-titled name for what you can find in the Kabbalah teachings. The anti-gnostic is predominately non-Gnosticism and is equal to a materialistic approach by appropriating the gnostic idea in a way that the story or the narrative is an illusion, a simulacrum, a holographic illusion, due to the material itself being an illusion – alongside science having a direct effect due to hydrogen being 99.99 per cent of space around a single proton. Adopting this consensus, they’ve concluded that the material is a hoax. These can lead to dangerous grounds because they can be used to put forward specific agendas without going through ethical filters or argument/debate. The anti-gnostic and the holographic oneness groups take similar paths, and researchers like Neil Kramer argue that everything, in reality, is made real through a collective dream. Still, there is a fallacy in this equation. The material being an illusion is just an abstract that can only be held in the mind and forever argued in Academia. Philosophers have concluded there are outside perceptions given to us, outside of our control, and that humanity works symbiotically with them – our insanity comes about in thinking we are set apart from it or fully responsible for it on the unconscious level.

Terence McKenna once stated that the Universe, at its core, is manifested through language, a concept supported by the idea that the observer plays a crucial role in the process. He suggests that we are on the brink of an evolutionary transformation in language that coincides with changes in our human form and genetic makeup. Take, for example, the Pineal gland. Throughout history, it has often been associated with the soul. This historical perspective may represent the complex evolution of an animal species striving to develop a true language, suggesting that we have yet to arrive at this point fully. The underlying idea is that true language is a phenomenon we have yet to comprehend fully. As we explore this concept, we realise that the world has an elusive mental dimension, but we are gradually moving toward a better understanding of it.

When people attempt to understand their universe and its complexities through notions of reality, space, and time, we often assume that the world is constructed from language. If we accept that the world is made up of language, it becomes challenging to identify its boundaries. Do we truly need to believe in the existence of distant galaxies? Imagine if the universe is being generated within the human mind, specifically in the cerebellum, as a phenomenon of language. What gives these distant universes significance, especially when they only register faint traces on telescopic instruments? This notion leads to a hero-worship model of theorists and their theories, particularly considering that telescopes were invented only in the 1950s. Yet, this invention now shapes our entire understanding of the universe. However, if we consider the total energy detected by all the radio telescopes since their inception, it would amount to less energy than that produced by cigarette ash falling from a distance of two feet. This is the foundation upon which our data is built, from which we extrapolate ideas about exploding galaxies and other phenomena. This model feels dismal and disempowering, reducing our sense of scale and relevance in the cosmos. It makes us appear tiny and insignificant, which is a flimsy perspective when contrasted with the immediacy of our existence.

Magical philosophy, having a few more centuries under its belt than science, has only been around since the Renaissance and has always claimed the world is made up of language. Western religion begins with a cryptic message; in the beginning, it was the ‘word’, and the word was made flesh. Reality is starting to lean towards the notion that it’s more like a novel than an integrated equation of the third degree, which is what physics would have us believe. Perhaps it’s a novel in which you are a character with all the emotions associated with your archetype. If the world is a novelty-producing conserving engine, and if we define novelty as the density of connectedness – then the Human Neo Cortex becomes the centre of the cosmic drama. The Cortex is a complex material in the universe – so, through a thousand years of marginalisation, suddenly, through the injection of science, there is permission to believe that the cosmic drama is really about us. That we carry the load in this play, and this is a play about the career and preservation of novelty and complexity. Thus, we are central actors in that drama, and if something were to happen to us in our enterprise, the universe would be vastly diminished. (Terence McKenna -The World and It’s Double, seminar n.d) 

These arguments point towards Positivism, The idea that everything in our physical reality only exists through verified scientific proof via logic and mathematics. And anything outside of it, such as metaphysics and theism, holds no consideration. Positivism allows academics and scientists to go further in their search for truth; such attempts are met with ridicule and loss of creditability. This materialist paradigm denies the inner life and instead promotes limited materialism, where we are fooled into thinking we are self-referential conscious beings. To accept that kind of thinking, you are being misled to believe that you are conscious by your brain; it is logical to think a rock can think of itself as an animal. The rock isn’t conscious; you must be conscious to be fooled. These beliefs must always be followed, especially in the scientific community. Even if those scientists have gone through some spiritual awakening; near-death experiences, MDMA experimentations, and so forth – they cannot speak about those experiences that hold clues to consciousness itself because of scientific dogma known as scientism.

This kind of dogma is not new to religion, especially towards fundamentalist Christians; a potentiality of Christian fundamentalism is Christian positivism. This explains why fundamentalist Christians don’t accept any Eastern spiritual teachings as they deem them occult (no doubt a misrepresentation of the definition of the occult). This seems ironic, given they believe God is all love, which coincides with Bagghavita’s version of a loving God. And yet, they deny outside teachings, maybe because of an enduring historical racial aspect – but can accept a God that stems from the Hebrew Bible, which is Jewish and also can be linked to the Demiurge. [They don’t accept the myths surrounding Demiurge – selective acceptance and the ever-prevailing moving goalpost].

Right-wing Christians who have the proclivity for extreme conspiracy theories use the Gnostic terminologies only to attack and vilify their opponents within the Church; both the left and right use it in ways to describe and denigrate institutions they hate or adhere to – from liberalism to Republicans; Nazism to Maoism and everything in between. It’s even more confusing when you both have Democratic Evangelicals and Republican Evangelicals. No longer should political polarities be seen in a linear format but through movements of swirls or circles. The realm of matrix-para-politics is for the people’s benefit – and memes that are not seen as culturally advantageous are suppressed. Regarding accurate decisions, they’re not made by an elective representative, at least in the macro world of politics, but are made by small groups of influential individuals behind the curtain.

While conspiracy theory has similarities with ancient Gnostics, especially towards the process of being sceptical, that’s where the similarity ends. Their process is always incomplete – giving it a self-defeating quality. And this is due to a quality that they can’t get over, an inherent far-right and totalising of fascism and fundamentalism. It’s a shallow modern incarnation of pessimism and suspicion of Ancient Gnostics given the fictitious nature of the ‘Illuminati’ or the imaginary ‘Luciferians.’ Meaning that having the same process does not make them equal or on par with the same beliefs.      

.

.

Flat Earth; Enclosed Creationism; Conspiracy (Theory), Intuition and Imagination – Part Eleven

.

.

---

.

The Only Way Out is In [Posted initially on 27th March 2021]: In the last post, we discussed sacred and profane space and touched upon transcending duality and the mysteries of mystic space. This will be a continuation of what we call hyperreal-space [what we come to believe as the container that holds our satellized earth in its place] – compared to what I call space-real [can be seen as spatial concepts that illustration artists are familiar with]. And the transcendence of duality is about recognising that what we call hyperreal space is also what’s inside you.           

I mentioned briefly in the last post that a creator’s conformity balances an agenda aspect and their imaginative individual commitment. Expounded in the film Mulholland Drive depicts Hollywood Types with money to make the film; they are particular, weird and hard to please. These types are known as ‘studio mafia,’ However, even those types [producers] work for somebody else […], which can be known as a sort of Hollywood conspiracy. And this is a bigger idea than a producer’s preferences. The balance between an agenda and an imaginative commitment is examined, notably in a scene – where Adam Kesher, the director of The Hollywood Dream, protests that the film is his. However, the studio mafia responds, saying it’s no longer his film. This shows that Adam has no final Cut, nor does he have the option to begin with.

Diane befriends Camilla, an amnesiac woman; they both get driven up to Mulholland Drive on separate occasions, and the driver stops on both occasions. Two different depictions of the same event suggest Diane and Camilla are the same people with split personalities. Illustrated when Camilla changes her hair to resemble Betty’s, they go to Club Silencio, where Betty receives some revelation that makes her shake in her seat. And when they arrive home, Betty disappears, leaving Camilla to take the lead role in the dream with her Betty-style haircut. Diane ceases to be Betty and becomes Camilla.  

The terminology ‘casting-couch’ is a term that’s known in the industry to mean another thing, notably sexual favours. Camilla also represents the casting couch as a human form abstraction. In Diane’s Hollywood dream, Camilla Rhodes is the blond girl with the pearls because she is a casting couch actress. This outlines that the brunette woman Camilla Rhodes is not a real person. Between the two main points of the film – when Diane enters the Hollywood studio set and when she opens the blue box- is a transition showcasing Diane falling in love with the casting-couch idea. This is a setup as a transition scene. First, there is a death scene in an apartment where both witness a dead body [the dead body is Diane/Betty]. This is to showcase Diane’s symbolic death of her naive dream and a wake-up call to reality. Camilla reacts strongly, but Diana does not because both Diane and Betty are too naïve, but the part that is Diane that is Camilla is not. The other is when Diane ritualises her idea of falling in love with the casting-couch idea [or being a movie star], which is depicted in a sex scene with Camilla [with herself essentially]. 

The Blue Box represents silence, the actual conspiracy when Diane shakes and kills off her naivety to be part of that Club, a club of silence [Silencio]. This is depicted in a scene when Diane and Camilla return from the Club. Diana holds a blue box with a blue key to unlock; she puts it on the bed. Then, Diana disappears. She disappears because she becomes the new Camilla Rhodes. The film conveys this when Camilla opens the box, and the camera zooms into the box, signifying Diana’s entrance or entrapment into the Club of Silence [blue box]. Diane had the blue Key beforehand, shown towards the film’s end. Diane has decided to prostitute herself for that dream; she gives her inheritance to a bloke named Joe. Joe is the sleazy equivalent of the real Hollywood as opposed to the dream; he is also a sort of Hitman. Joe holds the Key to that dream, which Diane now has.

	Pearl = innocence
	Blue Box = Silence
	Music = Movie magic

.

David Lynch has always used music to set a tone, and his 2002 movie had subliminal layers with situations regarding the many implications of behind-the-scenes movie productions. With the fall of Weinstein after which made public, Lynch hinted at this kind of perversity in this flick [The Other Side of the Hollywood Dream]. Rose McGowan is one of those at the forefront of that takedown. She recently started her support to the victims of abuse by Marilyn Manson. She mentions Hollywood is a cult but emphasises that the entertainment industry is also a cult, including the music industry. McGowan herself was engaged to Manson at one stage.

I remember Manson once hosted an Australian show, Rage, as a guest. The guest chooses his favourite music videos for the public. One of his choices was Celebrity Skin from Courtney Love. He gave a short remark about the old Courtney from the band Hole in Contrast to the new Courtney on Hole’s most successful album. At the time, I never understood why he gave a contrasting comparison to such a typical process for success. Until it dawned on me [my subconscious always connecting dots] about Mulholland Drive’s implications regarding falling in love with the idea of casting a couch and being initiated in a box of silence. For Courtney, it was about falling in love with the idea of (the occult of) Fame. The documentary film Kurt and Courtney outlines details concerning the accusation that Cobain was murdered as opposed to suicide. The film suggested that the primary motive for the crime was due to the inheritance of Kurt’s assets and wealth, but I feel it’s more than that.

Courtney’s first album didn’t take off, but the album Live Through started to get recognised due to Kurt’s help as a ghostwriter; many others claimed this as well. Four years after Kurt’s death, they released Celebrity Skin, seemingly a success; more success would ensue, leading her to the quintessential Hollywood dream.

In the last post, we discussed the synchronicity around the X symbol. Kurt’s influence on music is so visionary that no other influence has ever had a more significant impact afterwards. In the Greek canon, the symbol Chi Rho [also known as Jesus], which is the letter X and P placed together to form a six-pointed cross, which is also the Cube, X and P in gematria is 3 and 3, which equals Six. 3 and 3 are also 33, which is the length Jesus lived. In gematria, the names Jesus, Nazareth, Light, Lamb of God, and Chi Rho are all equal to 27, and 27 is also the Trinity Cube via 3x3x3=27. Kurt is part of the club of famous people who died at 27. Kurt is a proxy sacrifice of light from a Siren [… guess who …] woman for whom the watchers fell. In the First Book of Enoch: Chapter XIX. 1. “And the women also of the angels who went astray shall become sirens.”

There is also the rune X, which means Gebo: “gay-boo”– literally: “gift” – esoteric: fair exchange, sacrifice, sacred marriage – “for every gift a curse.” The Kurt and Courtney documentary depicted a home video of them between momentary lucid and high bathing their child, and at the time, both proclaimed a moment of happiness. Trying to make sense of a relationship between a Narcissist [malignant or vulnerable] and an unhealthy codependent empath will only leave you confused. Did they genuinely love each other? Whatever the case, there is always something larger at play.

In her music video clip “Malibu”, she thanks the Goddess of the Sea with the Gebo pose. An X marks the spot for the Pearly Dew Drop – pearly dew-drop is the fall of angels; X is where they fall, also called the sacred centre. The sacred centre is an Eliade-like concept regarding Odysseus. He had to pass through the island of the Sirens before reaching the centre, a.k.a. sacred centre. Courtney’s band name is ‘Hole,’ a hole by any other name, such as a Navel, the World Tree, or sacred centre.

The Journey to the Sacred Centre: The Iron Age poets’ understanding of the world axis provided a pivotal mythological concept that is timeless. In contrast, sceptic science introduced the same concept [however, infinitely outside oneself] of the world axis as the earth’s axis on a spherical orbit. This axis is an imaginary pole that tilts at 23 degrees; this imaginary pole is a secular debasement of the sacred Pillar. Hyperreal space stems from Mircea Eliade’s notion of sacred space and boundaries. This comes from his analysis of the ‘Odyssey’ in which he derived these notions of sacred space and boundaries; this sacred–space is the space around the centre, the centre being the world axis, also known as the world tree, the Pillar, and the mountain. And unlike the earth’s axis, it doesn’t adopt made-up modern cosmological notions.

The juxtaposition of differences in the contours of worlds and their axes finds its commonality in the centre, the New Age’s notion of inner worlds, flat Earth’s notion of Mount Meru and Atlantis, and even the hyperreal notion of galactic centres. Timeless archetypes and myths concerning the human condition evolve around their own central pillar. The Odyssey is about Phaeacian Island Scheria [also known as Plato’s Atlantis] in contrast to Ithaca, Odysseus’ home world.         

One of the many interests Romanian historian Mircea Eliade was contented with was the symbolism of space and spatial orientation, made more apparent in the singular understanding of the Centre [Center], also known as the Axis Mundi. This motif of the world, the Navel, the mainstay of heaven, also known as Axis Mundi, is a term he coined, but the concept was not his. In a way, Eliade inspired hyperreal-space and spatial concepts in Homer’s Odyssey’s grand story so it can fit nicely into a sterilization concept. In a post-Flat-Earth-hype, it just made it more confusing. Or it’s just about identifying two separate concepts but ultimately coming from the same idea.            

Eliade describes spatial concepts as boundary situations where characters or individuals come to recognise their place in the universe by becoming conscious. Such self-revelation fosters an awareness of the dichotomy between one’s sacred space and the profane space of the other. Sacred space is a microcosm of the external world; it’s consciously delineated, set apart, and ordered, but outside the sacred space, a contrary world exists, characterised by formlessness, chaos, and danger. In this cosmological framework, the world comprises many concentric circles, with the centre representing a sacred space surrounded by a profane circle. Eliade posits that the heart of sacred space is the most sacred, as it embodies sacredness through revelation, epiphany, or hierophany. This concept is inherent to humanity and is fundamentally necessary for human society. Every society inevitably exhibits this understanding of a ritually delineated centre for the encounter with the sacred, consciously or unconsciously.

The simple consequence of living in three-dimensional space while keeping within them the notions that some people, places, and things are sacred while others are not. These centres are expressed in several forms, primarily manifesting in cultic objects or abstract symbols – such as the world tree or pillar holding up the heavens, both appearing as symbols in the Odyssey. Eliade conceived that the powers of these centres are derived from the point of intersection between the celestial world (Mount Olympus) and Hyades and the world of Men (material world). In these centres, plane ruptures occur (this is where communication is said to pass between these separate planes). The conduit for these communications, according to Eliade, occurs through the motif of the axis Mundi (world axis), which at once connects and supports heaven and earth and its base is fixed in a world below.

It’s from this universal pillar at the centre of the world from which the entire world extends. If we think of it this way, all other centres are merely imitations eternally repeating the same archaic image: the cosmic mountain, the world tree, the central pillar, etc. In light of this, Eliade proposed a multiplicity of centres with a transferable nature. During the flat-earth hype, they mention other lands beyond the ice wall. The ice wall being Antarctica, and beyond Antarctica are possible outskirts of other centres from which a dome acts as a separation barrier. However, I believe the notion of a dome begins and ends in the firmament. In light of sacred space, you can assume the hyperreal-space cosmos’s whole motive was to separate you from the sacred. The multiplicities of centres are now solar systems among an infinite number of other solar systems in tangent orbit around a galactic centre. 

One of the many premises in Homer’s Odyessy (and Return to Ithaca) was about Odysseus losing himself in a land of mystery, magic, and gods. Odysseus’ journey from one sacred space to another is a quest to find his sacred space and return to Ithaca. Modern-day retellings come in the form of sci-fi shows like Battlestar Galactica Lost and aspects of Deep-Space-Nine, such as Captain Sisko embodying aspects of Odysseus himself. In Battlestar Galactica, Kara Thrace embodies a particular archetype, a prophet whose destiny is pre-destined. In the episode ‘Maelstrom’, she enters a symbolic centre with her spaceship and dies … well, everyone assumed she had. Symbolic Centre works in tangent with the Eye of Jupiter symbol she envisioned before it was known to others. The symbol was embedded in a temple, a road sign to Earth. Earth is Ithaca in this instance. Kara returns to life in a messiah-like fashion in the crossroads-part 2 episode. She tells Apollo, “I’ve been to Earth; I know where it is, and I’m going to take us there.” Kara Thrace to the Cylons is described as an “Angel blazing in the light God, an Angel who will lead her people home.” 

There are references to maritime centres being focal points for sacred spaces, serving as intersections between heaven and earth. The pillar often symbolises this connection, mythologised through the Greek god Atlas. The idea of a world centre is transferrable, suggesting that multiple centres can emerge from a single narrative. Notably, the “Center of the World” concept is not a fixed location; it is subjective and can shift depending on the narrative’s focal point. This notion can be interpreted in various ways, though it is primarily understood through metaphors. One prominent narrative or paradigm presents the sacred space or centre as a galactic entity in this context. According to Astro-Gnostics, the Pleroma exists in this realm as well. Additionally, there is the possibility of a literal interpretation of the centre itself, separate from the symbolic metaphors of narrative points. Flat-earthers hold this viewpoint, believing the centre is located at the North Pole.

In the TV show Lost, which is about groups of people who crash-land their plane on an island, the group finds the island filled with mystery and magic. In some ways, the island embodies the world-center motif. The island has a centre in which a mysterious light exists that the island’s caretakers have covered – to keep evil entities from entering the island. This is a nod to the ruptures of planes that Eliade alluded to, how ruptures allow communication between planes. The island acts as a location and an entity with no fixed locations. It continually moves. Then, the island reveals that electromagnetic pockets exist and a hidden ancient wheel exists underneath a specific research station. By turning the wheel, the island moves. The wheel becomes dislodged, making the island move through time. This seems to exemplify the world centre of the lost island, which has no fixed location but moves depending on the narrative’s focal point. Or the focal point of the co-creator as they tell their story [narrative].

The concept of the world’s centre—represented by symbols like the Tree, Mountain, and Pillars—serves as a reference point in space where past experiences and revelations can be anchored. In the ancient Mediterranean, the idea of a sacred space was dominated by a central point, where one centre’s experience was interconnected with every other. Each centre represents a boundary situation akin to what Eliade described, involving moments of personal reflection and subsequent revelations. The show Lost illustrates this interconnectedness through flashbacks of key characters, highlighting that their experiences are linked and exhibit a sense of synchronistic causality. As they reflect on their journeys, their insights have meaningful synchronicities. The characters find themselves on a magical island, representing this sacred centre—a literal sacred space—juxtaposed against their ordinary lives or profane centres. This sacred centre is so profound that it defies rational explanation; it has a familiarity that can parallel meaningful dreams and such analysis of the mystical realm of memory, influenced by imagination and dreams. Describing these deeply symbolic and surreal experiences is akin to explaining prophetic dreams, where the essence often gets lost in translation. This familiar centre, as tangible as the profane one, is understood through revelations that resonate with the island’s central light source.

Battlestar Galactica is set against the backdrop of hyperreal space. The show mashes myth and secular notions. For example, conveying that our long-lost brethren are ancient aliens that travelled among the stars to reach Earth. Once they arrive, they co-mingle with Earth’s natives, and the natives, in reverence to them, will become known as cargo cults. In this regard, space is an extension of the Pleromic Galactic centre, signifying a sort of infinite sacredness, but at times, it is limited to made-up astronomical rules. Each planet they visit is a journey from one profane space to another. Even when they thought they’d reached Earth, they discovered it was desolated as their collapsed empire planet Caprica. When they reach their new Earth, their Ithaca, it’s a relatively new planet. This is as close to Eden as they possibly fit in their worldview.

Back to Ithaca: In the Odyssey, the boundary situation is revealed through Odysseus’ moments of reflection and revelations. Upon being washed ashore in Scheria, Nausicaa, daughter of the Phaeacian king Alcinous, sees him. He pondered whether he had encountered a goddess or a girl with significant beauty; he asked, ‘Are you, god or mortal?’ If you are a god who holds light heaven, I think you are nearest Artemis, great Zeus’s daughter in figure or stature. However, this moment of doubt his mind offsets when Nausicaa’s appearance elicits a vivid memory in Odysseus’ mind while he stands locked in amazement. This amazement and beauty remind Odysseus of a palm tree that grew next to the altar of Apollo in Delos. For centuries, the ancients described Delos as a mythical centre of the Greek world as it was presumed to be an island that held the World Navel [or Olympus]. Therefore, the tree next to the altar at Delos would be an explicit centre of that world tree, which Odysseus recalls as the godlike Nausicaa. The immediate space around Nausicaa (because she is a goddess) becomes sacred at that moment. This event would set the tone for the remainder of that particular episode among the utopian Phaeacians. It’s as if hierophany [manifestation of the sacred in whatever object (symbols)] of the divine participates in one archetypal experience outside of time and space – which is so strange to its recipient that it can only be conveyed by metaphor, by recalling other examples of that experience.

Not long after this scene on the beach, Nausicaa plans for Odysseus to enter the Phaeacian town and be drawn into a new orbit Centre. These would be the pillars of Achanious’s palaces. From this point onward, the new Centre will become one of two dominant centres of the narrative – the central pillars [palace] of Alchanious become sacred space counterpoint to space around the pillars of Odysseus’ own Ithaca. Odysseus convinces Nausicaa to take him to her father’s palace. She gives him directions and instructions to find her parents’ palace and who might be able to secure safe passage home. She gives the Phaeacian city’s beautiful flowing geographical orientation with its walls, towers, shipyards, temples, and sacred groves. Odysseus is to travel through these landmarks; after that, he will reach the palace of Alcinous. He would enter a courtyard where he would find Nausicaa’s mother leaning against a pillar with her handmaidens. A sight to behold, and next to the pillar is King Alcinous. A pillar is an object with symbolic significance. It stands between the Phaecian King and Queen. It becomes a focal point, a symbol of the royal family’s godlike nature and of Odysseus’ longing to return to his world and the pillars of his halls. Once Alcinous and Odysseus meet, the king promises he will guarantee Odysseus’s return.

Phaeacia is a sacred space in a purely Eliade-like sense. It’s ordered and set apart; it’s safe and free from the chaos and unpredictability of the sea. It’s a land where gods are known to come down from the skies and feast with men. So, it would come to light that Odysseus would be part of this feast ritual, and a song is played during the feast. There are two Eliade-like boundary situations. One concerning a quarrel between Odysseus and Achilles at Troy, this moment is a self-revelation and an expression of power, characteristic of sacred space. The second is an affirmation scene in Ithaca from Odysseus’s Wife’s point of view. His wife Penelope stood beneath a pillar during a feast. She is moved to tears by the barred Athenian song, which floods her with thoughts of her husband’s absence and a realization that her own sacred space was incomplete and violated. Ultimately, the pillar barred and the realization of separation links these scenes together. Having spent time in the city filled with gods and magic, Odysseus still realizes that this sacred space is not his own. This is affirmed through these boundary-like situations.

The Phaeacians are prepared to send Odysseus home. We have a farewell scene between Odysseus and Nausicaa, which takes place beneath a pillar. Afterwards, with her god-like beauty, Nausicaa stands beside a column of a densely made roof, which reminds Odysseus of his life in Ithaca. He replied, “Nausicaa, would their heiress, loud, thundering husband Zeus, make it so that I may go home to see my homecoming day? I pray to you then, even there as a goddess. Every day, for you, my girl has saved me.” The ambiguity of the first scene regarding whether or not Nausicaa is a goddess, with its digression to a palm tree at Delos, is retained in this farewell speech. Odysseus makes a vow to the gods [religious act], promising that upon his safe return home [arrival to his own sacred space], he will remember and pray to the girl as if she were a goddess. Nausicaa symbolises his safety and reintegration into his sacred space after being lost amidst the sacred world.

As Odysseus bids goodbye to the girl next to the pillar, he bids goodbye to the Phaeacian palace and, by extension, to all the lands it governs. The departure of Odysseus marks the end of the Phaeacian utopia. This episode attests to the highly personalized and subjective nature of sacred space and its proneness to the ravages of the profane world. Once its boundaries are not well-maintained, the gods grow angry when the sacred qualities of the Phaeacian utopia are spilled out into the profane world in the form of escorts on magical ships from strangers lost at sea. The poorest boundaries of sacred space reveal the tenuous nature that the Phaeacians send away from their island. That is when they send pieces of sacred space outside their divinely sanctioned boundary. Both Odysseus carried the chaos of the profane world to Alcinous’s hall in the form of Poseidon’s wrath, and Alcinous granted safe passage to all exporting sacredness.

We see that it’s ultimately poor management of boundaries in the eyes of the gods, which is responsible for the mountain eventually being brought down upon Scheria. This is the disaster that snuffed out all the Phaeacian sacred space. By its very nature, sacred space can only retain its sacred character insofar as it’s set apart from the wider world. When it’s open and available to everyone, it loses its sacredness and set-apartness, diluted and swallowed up by a more prevalent profane world. Upon reaching Ithaca, Odysseus’ struggle will be re-establishing boundaries and expelling his sacred space from the profane world that has spilled in from his 20 years of involuntary absence and powerlessness to maintain his boundaries.

We see the Eliade-type model of sacred space with its centre based on the presence of an archetypal model axis Mundi – a vertically aligned tree or pillar that works happily within the Odyssey. It acts as an archetypal model now, although it may have been real throughout the early gestation of Man and civilization. We’ve seen how the symbolic objects set the scene for boundary situations when characters become acutely aware of their place vis-a-vis sacred and profane space and subsequently have an epiphany or revelation.

And let’s remember enlightenment, which can be defined through mystic space and a gateway or a peek towards sacred space. Why do many of Alex Grey’s prominent paintings signify faces morphed into psychedelic symbolic pillars more than coincidence? [He (Odysseus) would enter a courtyard where he will find Nausicaa’s mother with her handmaidens leaning against a pillar … a sight to behold.] Odysseus longs to be in a profane space when he has lived amongst gods and the sacred; Odysseus still wants his own sacred space, which is defined by his wife, Penelope. In a way, Penelope and the halls of his pillars are sacred spaces of his liking, an axis of his world. In doing so, it contrasts these centres – from the bittersweet utopian land of the Phaeacians and the much sought-after ruins of Ithaca. 

New-Age and Hyperreal-Space Eschatology: However, it is about an inherent longing to seek out that sacred space for the rest of the people within the profane space. A staple quality of (Astro) is Gnostics, who feel intuitively in some way that this world is not their actual world. Also, this intuitive longing is purposely being hidden from the people. There is a plot, perhaps a possible conspiracy – or various forms of resistance that are agenda-driven – to make such notions of sacred/mystical centres a nonsensical one.

Flat-Earth-New-Agers draws upon these old myths of profane and sacred centres while adding their truths to them. For it to have some credibility – they back their claims through multiple spokespersons that have been part of mind control programs and underground cloning facilities. What does Flat-Earth have to do with Mk-Ultra and underground cloning facilities? Its relationships rely on the claim that these subjects, now disclosure agents, were part of secret space programs now called breakaway civilisations, given space as we commonly know it is a misnomer.

They view these multiple differences in reality as dependent on how one can extract meaning from them. The dome version could have been disinformation. At the same time, it can have merit where the dome is simply the depth of space and void, where the electric-magnetic field of the earth is a field that no human can enter. The electric-magnetic field works symbiotically to keep life going. It’s like the field works as a soul for the earth; as humans, our energy and consciousness are tied into this field. If it were to leave, the body would shut off – the soul would return to the ether. And the body would just be there, floating in space. The dome signifies reality for the soul. However, it doesn’t mean humans can’t go out there. A substance commonly known as ‘black goo’ bombarded the planet. This foreign consciousness imbued itself to our planet, resulting in a mineral with a unique crystalline structure. Suppose one separates that or takes a piece to create a shield around a craft. They can leave the earth’s dome or electric magnetic shield to travel at that point.

Hyperreal-space notions and common scientific reasoning are described differently through the subject of MK-ultra to give it more credibility. Mind-control [Mk-Ultra], a subject about altar egos, soul transference, handlers, clones, celebrities, trauma, and teleportation, is always a mixed bag of possible truths with science-fiction added to it. At least science fiction gives us entertainment value when it’s in its proper lane. Testimonials from Mk-Ultra subjects now paid public-relations actors with close ties to hoax actors lose credibility in an instance as soon as they mention notions of teleportation. Being able to teleport from one facility to another espouses science fiction or something that comes out of ufology. Their heads often jumbled so much – which they started to believe their fantasies. Where once alien abductees were the norm, these guys are the new norm but leave the ‘science-fiction to the writers. Teleportation – Star-Trek and Fringe: Black Goo – X-files and Prometheus. The Black Goo, commonly known as Black Oil, was about psychotropic drugs used for mind-control programs.

The New Age and traditional Christian worldviews are dependent on the hyperreal-space worldview, and their flat-earth tangents merely work as damage control for them. They adopt various composites of narrative to their agenda, for instance, regarding my last post about memory and reason. We discussed memory seen through an unfathomable form of romanticism, which is geared towards shaping the unfathomable with experience to a romantic vision that often morphs into (cult) groups. That imbues perfect love, race, and nation, ultimately a deformed version of memory. New-Age-Flat-Earth and Christian-Enclosed-Creationist groups embody these characteristics of the romantic vision in their way. New-Age-Flat-Earth groups rally behind their Mk-Ultra disclosure/spokesperson agents because they believe them wholeheartedly when they say they’ve been to the centre. [I’ve been to earth; I can take you there, a notion of Starbuck]. There is a messiah/prophet complex to these testimonial agents. They say the only way to enter this sacred space, this centre, is to transcend their duality fully. I believe that they were mind-controlled, but anything beyond that is a deformed version of memory. They’re just mixing unfathomable forms of romanticism with new-age notions.   

The notion of transcending duality as a critical component to entering the sacred centre/vortex is an Eliade-like idea concerning liberation. He calls it the ‘refusal of history’ or the ‘myth of the eternal return,’ which was about cycles of time or a cosmic reincarnation of the world. The transcendence of duality [or liberation] is merely about understanding existential evils and suffering and having a means of minimizing it during the reincarnation process. He suggested a concept of accepting liberation, so when juxtaposed against the vast cycles, it changes people’s worldview—not curing suffering but rising above it and out of it. I doubt it’s about an exclusive practice of oneness. People enter this sacred centre every night. Terence Mckenna once suggested that when we dream [mystical-space], we go into another layer, a deep absolute [supreme-being] dreams we have no memory of.

Their bold claim is to suggest that memories are not stored in the brain but stored somewhere else and that within each clone, they can re-trigger or download those memories onto them. They can also re-trigger those memories to their original bodies if they wish. The memory aspect is taken from Sheldrake’s theoretical assumption that memory may be stored elsewhere. New-Age-Flat-Earthers, however, conflates his meaning. They miss his notion about telepathy-type interconnections between organisms and collective memories within species. There have also been discoveries about genetic memory encoded in DNA, which raises many questions about tribal groups that link back to the earliest family tree and the first Adam. You can evaluate that Sheldrake is a Jungian, equating his theories from the collective unconscious to collective memories. The ability to lock and unlock memories through Mk-Ultra trauma-based programs is another mixed bag. The ability to create soulless beings to do their bidding by activating personality types and false memories through symbols and triggers is probable. However, to claim the ability to capture consciousness or compartmentalize it regulates the soul to an etheric substance that can be controlled and redistributed between bodies – seems purely science fiction.

Where have I seen (heard) this before? Battlestar Galactica. The Cylons or Cy-clones have a ship called Resurrection to re-integrate the Cylon’s memories into a new body if they should die. To assume that it’s real would be a degradation of the individual and the spirit. And this has been a long story-telling fictional trope. This is the golem or Frankenstein character; these characters come back to life but are not quite the real person that came back, but a shadow of their former self. So, when they say subjects [seen in pop star icons] that spaz out or break down are due to consciousness snapping back into the body. Such a case may suppress memory or suppression of the true self coming back to the surface, but because of the degradation of the body and mind, it’s out of synch, so the body and mind break down. This is an extension of Einstein’s notion that time travel cannot exist, but perhaps consciousness travelling through time can—a trope adopted as an effect for story-telling, notably the science-fiction idea of time displacement.

The show Lost shows this example, where Desmond and the other by Charlotte. Desmond’s consciousness travels back into his younger self’s body, while his younger self’s consciousness travels to his present self’s body. A swapping of consciousness from present sacred space to past profane space and vice versa, but with each travel, the body is degraded. At the same time, Charlotte finds herself on an island (sacred space) moving in time, the displacing issue made apparent because the island’s wheel rim had been dislodged. During these time flashes, Charlotte’s body and mind start to deteriorate faster than the rest due to having lived on the island as a child.

They believed in their conjured hyperreal-space simulation so much that they’d forgotten it wasn’t real. The same can be said about these hyperreal-genetic-determinists equating the body and soul to a machine, but the aspect of soul and consciousness always thwarts them. The error comes in determining memory acts as the soul. Transhumanists have been trying to solve this roadblock for decades and have consistently failed. If true, it would be less about common P.R.’s promotion of longevity and immortality. Instead, it would be about the imprisonment of consciousness behind the curtain. Somewhat playing on the half-maker’s descent out of the Pleroma and his jealousy of the human spirit and the spirit’s journey to heaven. 

The breakaway civilizations are a grandiose rebuilding of Phaeacia (Atlantis) – but this attempt will always be a poor copy of the original. It may establish a similar trait insofar as it’s set apart beyond the fact that it’s missing a few criteria. The sacredness quality, gods, and the location being established beyond the ice wall are even farther than the profane; there are no literal pillars. Aside from these missing components, they’re also overly concerned with death, judgment, and the soul’s final destiny. They think they can bypass these concerns through their ace in the hole, betting it all on their technology derived from Nikola Tesla and crashed Archons (UFO) crash sites. Breakaway societies throughout history have always been in the form of secret societies. However, the manifestation to make it literal and exclusive came about through technologies that inspired them and other nefarious reasons.       

Flat-Earth-Christian-Fundamentalists and the Hyperreal-Space Eschatology: For flat-earth fundamentalist Christians, the understanding of sacred space/centre is similar to that of New Age Flat Earthers, both adopting esoteric thought like the Fibonacci sequence and Phi ratio. Enclosed Creationist Flat Earthers claim that the (inverted) vortex [centre] pushes down on the centre, creating ocean and wind currents and gravity.

However, what sets them apart is predictable at this point. Notions of transcending duality are out of the question; they see this as a deception. To them, it has to be one or the other; you’re either for Christ or against him. You cannot be for Christ and against Satan; there are no grey areas, and God does not have grey areas. We’ve long discussed the (non)-existence of historical Jesus to that of the Jesus [Logos], an archetypal staple in the spiritual drama, and that there is a clear distinction. This aspect of history in and of itself is a grey area, which makes the memory of it unstructured. So, this claim, ‘you cannot be for Christ and against Satan,’ is a conflation opinion passed on as truth to God. It’s as if they have this psychotic reaction to not admit certain historical myths valuable in understanding the whole story. They do this by mentioning Satan the Big Bad as often as possible, as well as the Triple 6, without giving it context. [This is where they conflate their interpretation of God].  

Fundamentalists are not all the same, and those who lean towards a belief in a flat earth are open to New-Age notions only to a point that can match biblical revelations. So it’s a clear ‘no’ to ‘transcending duality’ and ‘no’ to the hermetic reference of ‘as above, so below’ but yes to sacred geometry and the Fibonacci and Phi sequence. I don’t know if it’s hypocrisy, contradictive or selective acceptance, though you will soon see it’s all above.

Flat-earth-fundamentalist Christians believe in a new Jerusalem and that this new Jerusalem will be encapsulated inside a Cube. This new Jerusalem will come from heaven within a vortex and land in the sacred centre. They see this as a marriage of Christ’s returns, but it’s a flat-earth update concerning the sacred centre with the second coming. Revelation 21:22-27 describes the nations walking by the light of the New Jerusalem. After the second coming, the New Jerusalem will replace the Sun as Earth’s light source. Also, Revelation 21:22-27 describes the Kings of Earth bringing their splendour to the New Jerusalem but says nothing impure can ever enter it, only those whose names are written in the Lamb’s Book of Life, which describes the believers and followers of Christ. This Cube is made of gold – because it is referenced in Revelation 21:15-18: … 17 – And he measured the wall thereof, and HUNDRED AND FORTY AND FOUR CUBITS, according to the measure of a man that is, of the angel. 18 – And the building of the wall of it was jasper: and the city was pure gold, like unto clear glass.

Once this new Jerusalem comes down, ‘heaven and earth are made new,’ God will recreate everything perfectly without flaw. They believe 144 Cubits is also a reference to the pattern of the Cube found in the Fibonacci sequence, where you will find the infinite golden mean. The Cube is also 42. They believe we are in Satan’s upside-down world, a false cube. And the real Cube is the Tesseract. The Tesseract is also called an 8-cell or regular Octachoron or Cubic Prism in advanced geometry. It’s a virtual hypercube that can project a mirror image of one dimension onto another from the inside out before flipping one perspective into the other. It appears to have passed from 3d to 4d during a simulated hyper-dimension event.

In 21:16, the angel measures the city with a golden rod or reed and records it as 12,000. In ancient Greece, the measurement of 12,000 Stadia was 4.9 million square kilometres, about three-quarters of Australia’s size. For comparison, we can only reach up to 120,000 feet high or 22 miles. For a secular heliocentric view, the Cube would pass the moon by 384 km and encompass a whole country and more when it lands. For Flat Earthers, this would pass the celestial planes, what we call planets and reach the sky. In other measurements, 12,000 stadia is 2220 km [1380 miles].

Secular Moon	384,400 km	238,855 miles	1,261,154 400 feet
Mythical Cube	2220.000 km	1380.000 miles	7,286,400 000 feet
Int. Space station	386.00 km	240.0  miles	1267 200 feet
Max. Reach	36.53 km	22.7 miles	120 000 feet

.

There is also the astro-theological connection to 144 cubits. The square root of 144 cubits is 12, and there are 12 tribes of Israel, 12 apostles, and 12 hours a day. One hundred forty-four cubits are usually measured or equal to 65 meters or 72 yards, which is assumed to be the thickness of the hyperreal Cube wall. However, let’s get – [sing it] … ‘back to life … back to reality,’ New Jerusalem has always been about the building of the Third Temple, which is said to be built in the City of David or Zion. Even Swedenborgians describe New Jerusalem in the Bible as a prophetic description of the New Church.

When you look at a Cube, you’re also looking at sacred Geometry, and the Cube also means Kaaba or Kaballah. There are six sides in a Cube. The Cube is a geometrical representation of the human body. The Cube encapsulates the divine principles of creation. The number 6 in occult meaning means Christ or Anti-Christ, and anti-Christ means who would follow after Jesus, and it’s not opposition, but a replacement. Anti-Christ means replacement after Christ, whose number is 666. This is called apostolic succession. Every Pope is known as an anti-Christ god-proxy. Further, into occult meaning, it’s the crystal light divider and sex origin. Breaking down the triple 6 in its letters or gematria equals 653, 6+5+3 = 14, and 14+14+14 = 42 – So, you can’t accept and deny another aspect of the same thing. In Revelation 13:18, 666 is not Satanic but is described as wisdom, and the number of men in the Slavic division of Jesus is JE=45 SUS=666. Logos is the original Greek word for ‘word.’ We associate logos as a symbol made from geometry, which interconnects with numbers. And the word God is Pi. Forty-two means… the oneness, the word of God, and the 42 generations of Christ.

One of the names in the 42 generations of Christ is Jacob. In Lost and Mulholland Drive, the same actor plays the symbolic reference. Jacob’s list of contenders plays on Moses’ roll call of redemption linked with atonement (reconciliation with God). The Book of Life held much meaning for other world religions as well. 

Though transcending duality may be a watered-down claim to that of greater meaning, it plays on the notion of oneness in some ways. The Tesseract is simply a three-dimensional representation of principle in the sequence of the Fibonacci. When you follow the spiral to oneness [or the centre], it reaches a point where it restarts again, forever repeating its cycles. Does it mean you moved the dimensions? The movement of dimensions, in this case, means the New Earth. Not necessarily; it could mean the end of time or the end of an age. The Cube-Tesseract implies a dimensional change without actually moving dimensions because the Cube-Tesseract is the catalyst that would change the world on an atomic level.

However, the Tesseract is a conflation of the mythical renewal of the Cube. Apocryphon’s text does not describe the how or what. It just says New Jerusalem is the heavenly city that will come down from heaven and exist on the new earth at the end time. The new earth and new heaven, when compared against an Eliade-like concept of sacred space [axis mundi], are made redundant because the sacredness is gone. It’s no longer set apart – or is it upon this new earth that only civilization exists inside New Jerusalem [cube city], and outside is new but a wasteland? It would still be redundant if you had nothing to compare it to other than heaven, but New Jerusalem is already heavenly.

The flat-earth update of these apocalyptic themes in Revelations raises more questions than it reveals. But for the most part, it is a Judaic mystical understanding of Heaven. That parallels an Eliade concept of sacred and profane centres. In Jewish understanding, there are two promised lands, the heavenly and the earthly, in which the earthly is a copy of the heavenly. So, a hermetic principle [as above, so below] is fundamental. According to Jewish mystics, Heaven includes Jerusalem, the temple, the Ark of the Covenant, and the Garden of Eden with the Tree of Life. Christian Premillennialism holds that – following the end times and the second creation of Heaven and Earth, New Jerusalem will be the earthly location where all true believers will spend eternity with God. New Jerusalem is essential in Christianity and Judaism, though it holds more importance in Christian eschatology. No more so than Protestantism and Orthodox-Judaism, who believe in these renewal and reconstruction myths literally. Comic-con fandom has nothing on these fanatics.  

Flat-earth-fundamentalists adopt dispensationalists’ belief in a New Jerusalem that it will come down from heaven, but with an added detail – that it will be inside a toroidal vortex. And if it’s in a Vortex, it must land in the sacred centre. According to the text, the correct place it will land is not in the sacred centre but in the Temple Mount. The only proper way to reconcile this incorrect assumption is by recognising that both Odysseus and John of Patmos [in the New Testament describe his vision of New Jerusalem] use a Tree as a signifier to determine their place in the centre. Among the sacred, Odysseus is surrounded by pillars that remind him of a Tree in Delos. John gets taken to High Mountain by an angel to Jerusalem descendants, and what stood out to him were the Garden of Eden and the Tree of Life. Wherever the Tree of Worship stands is also where the centre is.                                                   

It seems there is a deep-seated desire for a city like Atlantis to return—a city created by God, distinct and separate. This rigid exclusivity of faith plays a crucial role in determining who can enter. It reflects lessons learned from the mistakes that led to the downfall of the mountain, tree, or pillar, which ultimately caused the collapse of Atlantis. It must maintain carefully managed boundaries and remain set apart to preserve its sacredness. Furthermore, this exclusivity must be aligned with a specific faith, which can sometimes conflict with the truth and be harmful. The Cube, or New Jerusalem, represents a renewal and reconstruction myth, transforming an ancient sacred centre into a new form, visualised as a Cube that serves as a modern Pillar.

However, there are still fundamental differences in belief systems regarding true cosmology. The Creator God [a.k.a. the Demiurge] is within the Firmament in the Gnostic cosmology. In the Evangelical model, He has replaced Sophia and sits in the upper Pleroma within the lower Aeons [meaning not the upper Pleroma]. Here, the Trinity no longer exists within the common consensus of belief; he has taken the mantle of the only True God. When explaining away eschatology, it’s free will, but only till my Cube arrives. There is an intuitive component that is fundamental; this is what all these stories hint at, and it might also be a possible entrapment. 

.

.

Flat Earth; Enclosed Creationism; Conspiracy (Theory), Memory and Reason – Part Ten

.

.

---

.

Resist the Evidence in Satellization [Restraint and Catharsis] — [Posted initially on 18th June 2020]: I will continue with the many subjects discussed in my last post that outline the Hegelian dialectical trap of Left and Right politics. The current social climate focuses on individualism, socialism, postmodernism, and so forth; strangely, it all depends on how one views memory and reason. A conspiracy theory has an inherent implication regarding memory, and that is a habit of distortion. This linear perspective focuses on quantification, leading to extreme views relegated within its polarities. The choices of good and evil between light and dark tend to leave out ethics as it becomes a fairy-tale version of memory. To view history through heroes, clashes, triumphs, and tragedies where blood is spilled – the liberation of freedom upon which the national and the individual are built – is ultimately a product of romanticism. A more precise evaluation that’s missing is a component that slides between restraint and catharsis. Blood being spilled is courage for the cause (good or bad), and restraint is a strength of memory, though it’s forgotten due to the ransom hysteria of blood. And the periodic need to defend that cause.

During the Cold War, the suggestion of nuclear annihilation in Cuban waters was something that happened and is an example of restraint in political terms. This very restraint kept them from killing each other. More recently, Australia’s navy was engaged in war games in the South China Sea with the Chinese Navy warships, which was only mitigated by the quality of restraint. Even when the United States requested the Australian Navy to exercise its drills further into the South China Sea. [All of these seem to be a cover for added tensions concerning a trade war – beckoned by a political-right-centric agenda as an effect on an ever-increasing collapse of Globalism]. They denied it, but Australia reinforced its strong intention as allies to the US [so, negging in political terms]. Although not as striking as the fear of nuclear attacks as it was in the Cold War, that same fear with its reflections of Catharsis. Now embedded in comic panels as a doomsday clock [the Watchmen], it captures a time in history and is a symbolic commercial manifestation of memory. Being commercialised, it’s less interested in restraint as it doesn’t sell as opposed to hysteria.

Memory is a product of romanticism and a belief in quantification – the quantifying and ordering of experience is an obsession with stability, which suggests fear, not in its opposite instability, but rather uncertainty and the unknown. When seen through a linear or technical perspective, this makes the memory of history lean towards a psychosis of dysfunctional memory – a rigid memory that is false and, with its rigidity, breaks down compared to vast and unstructured memory. For example, consider Morrison’s view that such atrocities of World War II will never happen again, an assumption that may be true. However, the effect spun into fragments, notably the Korean and Vietnam Wars and the Cold War. Memories viewed through these great unstructured waves, with their experience in the personal and social – fit into a collective experience akin to the collective unconscious and conscious.   

Memory can also be spatial in addition to being filled with layers because competing elements construct historical events and the events in our personal lives. Memory is always tunnelled through a narrow field to a quantifiable substance and its alternative; memory is an unfathomable form of romanticism. This is often geared towards shaping the unfathomable with experience to a romantic vision that usually morphs into (cult) groups. That imbues perfect love, race, and nation, ultimately a deformed version of memory. However, the very act of restraint is where civilisation is most civilised.

Take, for example, when esoteric truthers or historians regard the significance of words in their infancy through their etymology for the proposition of authenticity regarding the ‘word’. The meaning, however, is no longer closer to the idea of context because each word and phrase must be heard or written in the context of others. As well as the significance of how the word was heard at that time, this ultimately entails a thin layer concerning meaning in a single truth because of the complexity of memory. And this is when memory morphs into the opposite of the truth, regardless of the word’s meaning in its current state. There are reverberations of its other, earlier senses. How significant is this concerning biblical literature? There are also signs of apparent uncertainty when it comes to Christian conspiracy groups and their formation of truth when they use the notion of ‘truth’ through the process of etymology.

Catharsis, however, is driven by a reaction more so towards a cathartic gesture, which is a passive, unconscious form of action. When it concerns public affairs, cathartic memory acts as the negative side of layering. It becomes a non-cathartic memory with subtlety and the complexity of restraint—it understands that each action creates new layers of memory. This can heighten the individual or societal bodies positively or negatively. Healthy memory requires an understanding of those actions.

Cathartic memories are experiences or occurrences of memories formed through one’s lifetime from birth to death, with all the intricacies that apply to society. Creativity is catharsis for the artist and the public. I suspect that, for the artist-prophet, it would transcend linear time. However, catharsis becomes dysfunctional when organised into an ordering society memory. Take, for instance, the whole ‘woke movement’ [a possible mystery cult movement that is modernised and uses political correctness as its motivation to enforce the discipline of silence. As well as be distractions when you’re being initiated – by proscribing thoughts, identity politics, ideas, and words themselves]. It seems to lack restraint, and so it becomes evident in its deception that it lacks genuine sincerity as it metastasises into a false leftist version of good, which will inevitably have the opposite effect. If one views the ‘woke’ movements as a flowing tap set to complete, it becomes misrepresented when the gradualness of reaching that complete state does not develop steadily.

Alasdair Macintyre eloquently describes these dysfunctions or struggles: “the fragments of a conceptual scheme, parts which now lack those contexts from which their significance derives.” What we have, he says, is the “simulacra of morality” studded with “key expressions,” but the context escapes us. It’s funny how a postmodernist philosopher can best describe what’s missing within this whole ‘culture of woke movement’, seeing how postmodernism is under fire from anti-socialist intellects.

Therefore, any claim to suggest ‘the woke movement’ began in the liberal arts of certain universities, which then made its way through to mainstream media, propagating its ideologies methodically throughout the decades. And this is no more valid than assuming that it was more of a management failure rather than a conspiracy. Woke is more in tune with ideologies being pushed in their most simplistic form, and when this happens, it’s a recipe for disaster. And in many ways, it can be a form of religion, making it cult-like. Like any other ideologies being pushed, it will inevitably be short-lived. The mention of conspiracy shouldn’t stop at the focal point of gestation. Still, they should also mention that the rule of secret societies and elites regulates many universities.

The entertainment industries have taken a hit because of the rise of woke, but primarily from the simulated virus narrative and gas-lighting. This will soon fade because ideologies are transitory, except for fundamentalist ideology. Its memory in context is longer and is tied to religion, making it an ideology with a long lifespan.

To further explain what I mean by this failure, let’s return to etymologies, their meaning, and their association with memory. Take, for instance, the word ‘Neo-liberalism’. The word itself has nothing to do with 19th-century liberalism and ‘Neo-conservative,’ which has nothing to do with conservatism. We have here stealing of words – or morphing of words to perpetuate ideas in that censored form, but ultimately, it’s something they’re not. The adoption of established names where their memory has a history, but their true intention is the opposite without memory. To be woke is to be awake stemming from the New Age; awakening – and to be liberal, new-liberal, but ultimately pro-capitalist.

There is a clear parallel between the “cult of woke” and the “cult of neoliberalism.” Both can be defined by understanding that political correctness and neoliberalism are utopian ideas. This resemblance sounds almost religious, as it involves replacing the worship of God or gods with something else, like capitalism or a distorted sense of right and wrong. An intellectual cleansing regarding the economy, originating in universities, has removed any possibility of questioning prevailing ideas. As a result, macroeconomists have fallen into the hands of ideologues. This failure in management within the educational system mirrors the shortcomings of universities that allowed woke ideologies to flourish if one is inclined to trace it back to the universities. This dynamic can lead to history being erased or forgotten. Once history is disregarded, memory fades. Consequently, we are presented with an understanding of the economy and political correctness that needs to reflect reality. This misunderstanding is further reinforced by theoretical experts who quote the market’s invisible hand, suggesting that “the market will lead,” drawing low-level religious imagery around these concepts.  

So, institutional system managers need ideas beyond maintenance and bailouts. And this is because all these business graduates are just repeating previous managers. Who, by this stage, also have no context or memory to run or bravely change that system when an economic crisis looms. The cult of woke or a cult of ideals is that it’s a movement that lacks thought and argument, destroying everything from within. In order of importance, being woke is not as crucial as corruption – not just ordinary corruption, but legal corruption. This is the kind of corruption Marxists understand, where corruption is the face of capitalism. Still, it breaks every rule of capitalism when employees and CEOs take the money out of the bank for themselves, which has nothing to do with job competency.

If the ‘cult of woke’ is about the discipline of silence, they’re overly vocal about it. And their ideas of good are emphasized in the uptake of cancel culture. The silence only comes when you assassinate intuition and imagination. A psychosis must forget by making them aware of certain social situations, but because they’re without the context, they’ve swapped real memory with a false one. Though real memory is not there, to begin with, it can be hijacked – so any enlightenment where apotheosis can be derived from memory will never happen. 

This makes the Woke movement a pointless endeavour. Catharsis is an enemy of healthy memory, which is prevalent in creativity. This can examined in moving pictures – the excellent good versus evil motif tries to be timeless but is always ritualistic and constantly accessible. What threatens them is when memory is aimed at permanent uncertainty through the evocation of the imagination and is always brought forth in literature first. However, moving pictures can sometimes capture lightning in a bottle, which captures part of its timeless quality, important archetypal key-frames embedded in the everlastingness of fiction.

The United States’ indecisiveness to be either a Roman Empire or the Roman Republic can be a silver lining. Its failure to be decisive has an unrecognized effect on restraint. This could be due to a country that had never developed as a true federation, as it was generated inside an Enlightenment nineteenth-century model. Countries such as Canada and Australia were conceived in a medieval form from as early as the mid-nineteenth century and never attempted to become classic monolithic nation-states. Instead, they were federation countries with multiple personalities, religions, and languages. While on the surface, the United States is much of that same goal of a national dream, what came with it was a memory of upheaval: racism and slavery, civil wars, etc. I’m not saying Canada and Australia didn’t have their fair share of imperial drama. It’s just that the United States context of memory is far greater, has become an inherited dysfunction, and is still healing from it.

So, what is part of the healing process? The need to forget, but often the need to forget, has a natural reaction, and that is to perpetuate classic racism. Woke is less about the discipline of silence but a reactionary need to forget. The United States is at the precipice of change, whereas Canada and Australia have already graduated. It’s akin to Mediaeval Middle Europe, where racism is included in its multiracial, multicultural, multilinguistic ideas of rational nationalism. The United States missed this and should strive for a continental dream rather than a national one – a decentralized federal structure and a celebration of multiracial, multicultural, and multilinguistic cooperation and creativity.

The Wake of Woke gave rise to anti-woke proponents that attempted to challenge woke-witch-hunters, but both woke, and their adversary [anti-woke] equally lacked context. Most take advice from intellects, which is also limited in its memory and context of the subject they debate [the essential-sing Stalin Socialism subject as a conspiracy] that it can veer off to negative nationalism. These types of definitions are technical, like the definition of multiculturalism, which can’t exist. I can’t entirely agree with people when they say there is no such thing as multiculturalism in an attempt to redefine its meaning through a technicality [remember the ‘word’ and etymology and the environment it’s used in]. Federation countries are built on many different cultures; new cultures grew out of it like Jazz and Comic Books invented.

Resist the evidence; in Satellization continued [Morals and Values]: There is a need to differentiate rationalism or rationalism in a philosophical sense from rational-scientism (Nu-Atheism). Given that this is a Flat Earth thesis, we’ve established that Earth’s rotation around the Sun is not a fact. And to proceed with it as a fact only by simulation is a balance between good conscience and a lie and makes for a good debate. The falseness of the current belief system [heliocentrism] as a technical mistake is not as necessary in the grand scheme. What is essential is how falsity is used as a fact to justify questions that may never be answerable in an absolute way. If there is such a thing as ‘objective moral values,’ which, in Sam Harris’s case, there is, this is explained through his book ‘The Moral Landscapes.’ Though my rationale, having never read it and can only really go by its synopsis – is to claim that his notions are an example of Alasdair Macintyre’s ‘simulacra of morality.’ 

The book’s goal is to convince people that regardless of subjective morality [manifesting as objective] or morality as we know it in general terms, it is not enough and that we should be convinced that it is objective and that it’s a fact of nature. And this is exemplified by claiming that values have facts. And you find those values in science by measuring the levels of your well-being. So it’s like saying evolution (natural selection) is absolute because, in this construct, I feel good even though my subconscious has doubts. Or it’s like making reason absolute through rationalism. So, the book has many premises: morality and values depend on the conscious mind. This premise relies on linking consciousness with the brain, or rather, it’s in the brain, and the brain is natural. For this reason, there must be right or wrong answers to questions of morality and values that fall into the science category.

So when describing science, he’s referring to the simulated constructs of scientism; it’s essential to know the distinction [remember stealing of words]. Those with context and memory know consciousness is a metaphysical phenomenon and can exist outside the body. Science viewed through simulated constructs means facts/values are false. Facts are only building blocks of rationality. For example, it was a fact that the earth was flat, then it wasn’t, and then it is again. And this is where it’s necessary to be divisive. History has shown that society has been threatened by either/or because of the dark forces that reason can bring, both pure and instrumental. So, it’s easier to accept that they do not exist, and it is better to manage the essential irrationality of the pure and instrumental. Then, it’s less complicated to understand that reason is thought, and non-rational behaviour can be a good thing.

The premise for explaining morality through consciousness only as a product of the brain, which you can measure, is an incomplete assumption. It’s that old philosophical argument about reality – the debate on whether to deny that something may exist outside or external to our ideas, as opposed to the concept of reality you have of it. Reality exists only in your subjective experience or thinking of yourself as subjects over against objects; subjects are self-sufficient beings, and objects are things they dominate and control to objectify. Self-contained objects are a Descartes invention and were only completed through Kant by simultaneously accepting that they are rational and irrational.

So what happens when what we believe to be objective facts is false? Like the Earth’s rotation around the Sun. That objective reason becomes a simulation. Let me explain … If the value has facts, this can be determined through objectivity and observance by questioning the stage: where is the curve? Why does the Horizon keep its level at 120,000 feet high? Why do clouds move behind the Sun and Moon when they’re supposed to be millions of kilometres away, and so forth? The supposed facts are incongruent with objective reason when observed than it’s a simulation. Therefore, the book’s whole thesis for moral value/landscape is impossible because whatever foundation you hold as an objective reason can be hijacked or false, which makes it non-objective.

Any notions that facts must be answered through the principle of moral values: ‘answer in principle, and answers in practice.’ It seems like a focus on methodology, technology, and managerialism, but those come afterthought and reason after it’s been through rigorous argument. Reason requires a relationship with other qualities to function. Irrationality shows itself in a taste for the absolute answers or truth, in self-referentialism or the belief that specialization implies privileged access to truth. And this quality can sum up rational atheism in a nutshell. What if reason does away with those other qualities? In my assumption, moral landscapes do – answers in principle and answers in practice would be irrelevant and irrational. Answers in principle and answers in practice are examples of expansions and can be found everywhere. For example, religious or ideological approach, purity plus application, abstraction plus action, and so on – It’s just about pure reason, instrumental or utilitarian.

Without argument or debate, irrationality wins by default because that’s how the collective is indoctrinated to think. Even if the argument for reason were equal in value on both sides, it would still be irrational because reason is a limited phenomenon in the first place. Let’s face it; this is Science’s version of ideology when reason is all-inclusive, pure, and instrumental.

They claim they’re waiting for proof that must convince them that God exists. By the logic of the moral landscape, unanswerable absolutes may not be answered, but it doesn’t mean they can’t exist. By its logic, it declares that God exists, but then the book spends 80% of its time invalidating God’s existence. It’s logical because it’s unbound enough to be agnostic and limited enough to be faithless. Those burdened by proof are those that match certain archetypes in films where the protagonist is only a hero when a moment of clarity comes over them. When a realization or a change of thought comes to them by external or internal means but would have gotten there faster if they were open to other people’s ideas, values, and experiences [there is a definite hidden narcissism quality in there somewhere] – and let’s say a (nu)atheist does have a change of thought or was struck by the light of grace, the individual’s result [for most] would still be mediocre because to view one’s filtering mechanism as pure reason is deeply for self-interest. And what was the point of needing proof once they have it and don’t deliver once the light has been struck? Those without intuition make for crappy prophets.

There is also an attempt to hide ethics through morality [objective reason] when it’s about using reason to protect us from the darkness. And any attempt to hold what we want reason to be becomes fantasy or fear of reality. There is an implication or a need to identify ethics as moral values as unrefutable pure reason, thereby directing them through the mechanisms of instrumental reason. Perhaps because ethics play a role in memory, imagination, and instinct, these other qualities maintain our overall ethical quality, and the fear of reality is the fear of ethics being unbound by rationality. There is merit for that since history has proven when good intention turns into ethically motivated injustice, violence, and murder. These are present whenever ethics are confused with morality. Ethical qualities are the weakest compared to other qualities – it’s where fundamentalist Christians and Islamic groups, as well as dictators and technocratic politicians, can slip into extremism because of the weakness of the ethical principle.   

So why not anchor it in moral values and objective reasoning and attempt to make it absolute [the rational scientism version of fundamentalism]? To do so would not mean accepting that ethics is about good intentions, which is not what ethics is, nor is it moralistic. Ethics is weak because it needs to be exercised daily. The idea that man and the world can be rational is to set nature up as an enemy. Francis Bacon once said: “the world is made for man, not man for the world,” and any attempts to squeeze reality or individualism inside reason will not work.

Resist the evidence; in Satellization continued [The Agenda Aspect]: To further claim my assumption that Moral Landscapes is an example of simulacra of morality. This is due to how much the thought experiment is driven by an Agenda – which has conspiracy written all over it. Sam Harris is one of the meme-notion of the fore-horseman and one out of many Nu-Scientist figureheads that Epstein bankrolled.

Epstein was arrested for sex crimes as well as other unsavoury acts. And he allegedly died of suicide in a jail cell, but not before letting slip that he had dirt on powerful people from politicians to celebrities. This made a lot of powerful people nervous and would entail a cleansing of sorts by executing pro-woke-public-relation groups to silence their cash cow industry proponents that inappropriately misbehaved. This effect on the entertainment industry would parallel the intellectual cleansing of universities regarding economics and social sciences, where it would fall victim to ideologies. The establishment of ideologues implanted decades ago has grown into something that’s unchallenged. Silencing would require an act of short-lived assassinations of guilt towards the proponents of the entertainment industry behind the scenes.

Graduates of these Universities become creative gatekeepers of sorts and instil an agenda, perhaps subconsciously, into their creative works. This suggests that imagination is conformed to strong, politically correct ideas coded in the entertainment industry’s creative outcome, ultimately resulting in bad reviews and box office results. The question here is the nature of ideology, not a particular outcome. Creators believe they’ve made a creative decision but are often coerced by higher management; their conformity balances the agenda aspect and their imaginative individual commitment. Therefore, where is the agenda coming from? Modern marginalization of the imagination can be found as early as Marsilio Ficino, who was partly responsible for the Platonist revival during the Renaissance.

Owen Lee describes the imagination not being lodged in the brain through the inverted argument of art as a solid continuum needing reinvention. We already know what there is to know about ourselves. Yet, we do not know how to express or realise it. This is a fundamental notion that managers of perception try to manage by claiming society has grown out of their fear of uncertainty. They do this by advocating a safeguard for people as they need more time to be ready for the truth. However, this is just the promotion of a conformist structured society that sees the imagination as the “sick brain.”

Realising that these unquantifiable uncertainties can be used to manipulate is ironically an imaginative process in itself: the coronavirus simulation on reality and the Maoist/Stalin-socialist conspiracy plot to undermine the entertainment industry and universities [social sciences] both have a similar function. Both are viewed as coming from the radical left. The plot of intellectual cleansing will result in profits being lost, though, at the same time, billions are being made from specific private sectors due to the Virus simulation. Entertainment sectors are getting hit, yet they’re accountable to Chinese demographics; ideologies take a back seat to profit in this case. The point here is that institutional structures depend on each other. The Republic government is accountable to a technocratic corporation. The Liberal Government is beholden to the Republic government and technocratic corporations.      

However, people will not see the apparent doubt in this conspiracy theory due to the memory of context not being exercised. They would rather believe in a conspiracy defined through a singular narrative [the Maoist/Stalin-socialist conspiracy] as opposed to any other context. This way of thinking is like catnip for right-wing fundamentalist Christian (conspiracy) groups. Now, in tangent republican reactionary anti-woke knuckleheads [I mean Youtube anti-woke personalities]. They come to realise the hypocrisy in celebrities when they’re inclined to be a mouthpiece for moral values. Celebrities are better off leaving the thinking to creative writers, and they should just as actors/actresses play [act] the part. Perhaps its damage control is due to anti-woke sentiments. At the same time, ant-woke influencers who remark on them is also without context, especially if you have a one-dimensional look at socialism. And at times, they always seem to confuse Socialism with Fascism.

Socialism is about the government regulating private enterprises so they are less self-serving or profit-orienting and redistributing wealth. Countries like Denmark, Norway, Italy, France, and Germany are known as socialist countries; Germany is doing well economically for itself. [There are other aspects to socialism, but it’s a loaded subject and can’t be explained concisely] Concurrently, modern society has moved beyond Stalin’s socialist era. However, it doesn’t mean forgetting that it once existed [especially socialism’s tangent ideal ‘communism’] because, like classic racism, it will rear its ugly head if it were to be forgotten.

Combined with instrumental reason, the need to forget is an advantage for a society conformed to a structure that doesn’t need it, with instrumental reason being another form of utilitarianism. The imagination is regulated to something uncontrollable [a super-villain of sorts]; this is done by deconstructing or changing the perception or action of ethics, intuition, memory, and common sense. The perpetrators of this master plan [or agenda] are neither your left and right political polarities but rival elites in a war for ultimate power.   

Sam Harris claims there must be correct and incorrect questions of morality and values that potentially fall in the per-view of science. We’ve already established that this is just an attempt to identify ethics as moral values as absolute pure reason through the mechanism of instrumental reason – to limit the imagination. For example, notions of well-being are utilitarianism concepts; ethical theories prescribe actions to maximize well-being (happiness) for the affected individual. He differentiates himself by grounding it in facts. And as we know [or it’s a fact that] facts are only building blocks of rationality. And it’s a fact that facts are not rational.

Even in the realm of psychology, facts can become interchangeable. For example, self-harm was once considered a characteristic of borderline personality disorder, but this is no longer the case according to the DSM. Your well-being, as a measure of facts, can be fleeting. Furthermore, these facts are confined within a narcissistic framework that underpins our society. We encounter a simulation of choices, presenting a one-sided perspective that lacks balance and equilibrium. Additionally, while reason may utilize facts, it is not fundamentally based on them. Rationality relies not on proof but on thought and argument.

The public needs common sense, along with memory and context. So, regarding the current predicament of entertainment, people will not watch a terrible film. Regarding simulations, people are obligated to choose to either embrace a conformist structure or resist it. Where the creative act is most feared by conformist society, it often has the least need for imagination. And so we are hidden firm ourselves, and only art can reveal what we already know and perhaps what we don’t know. That’s why the art process, whatever form it takes, must live on and be minimally managed. The marginalization of art, whether in the denial of imagination or guilt, is used as a weapon – and it did so by cleansing the entertainment industry. This is probably a sleight of hand that takes the focus out of a conspiracy regarding the Epstein case. It’s a cleansing, but someone financed them, which means the conspiracy doesn’t end with Epstein.

While scientism is a relatively new term, the same idea and conspiracy can be traced back to the Renaissance. And this is where certain groups introduced a rational hyperreal notion of the cosmos, which became the new religion. In modern times, scientism is associated with Epstein, their financial beneficiary. Others among his payroll, from Dawkins to Sagan and others, were all promoting rational Atheism/Scientism/Science. Epstein was also friends with Bill Gates, who funds a lot of bio-engineering of Viruses/Vaccines. So there is this merging of Science and Scientism where pure reason is a sliding scale between the two. And this can be damaging because you never know the real facts.

Our imaginations are being marginalised, and we feel trapped within a narcissistic structure built on a simulation where facts appear to lack absolute value. Over time, specific facts may gain significance. One example is the longstanding belief that the world is flat, considered one of the most widely accepted “facts.” Therefore, it must be the truest of all facts. Indeed, the most rational. There is no need to resist this notion; doing so only leads to a circular debate between those who accept the presented “facts” and those who question them based on reason. This creates an endless cycle of arguments over the reliability of evidence, where the proliferation of false facts tends to mislead further.

Jacob Bronowski states that “no scientific theory is a collection of facts. It will not even do to call a theory true or false in the simple sense that every fact is either so or not. All science is the search for unity in the hidden likeness” You can use this statement in both arguments. So, the underlying discernment is to put you back to the alchemical definition of science. In addition, do not deny what you observe and be open to your intuition.

Alasdair Macintyre’s notion of simulacra of morality comes from an ethical post-Marxist philosopher who also describes what Marxism is by the end of the millennium. It is not what Engels and Kautsky, Lenin and Stalin, Trotsky, and Mao once preached. What remains of Eastern Marxism is merely conservative; what remains of Western Marxism is academic.

There is also a suggestion among other intellects that our current state, especially in the West [the United States in particular], increasingly resembles a Mussolini state. And this is a type of corporatism where your loyalty is to a group and is for self-interest. Mussolini also established the National Fascist Party. He also inspired other totalitarian dictators. He represents what corporatism is today; it’s just that there is this facade of democracy on the surface. At the same time, corporatism and self-interest led to totalitarianism behind the scenes – and much like the ancient Romans who kept the same facade of the Republic [the Senate, debates, and elections] but gradually separated from populism to false populism and then an empire.

This makes the whole argument regarding a Maoist/Stalin-socialist conspiracy [that started in the universities and eventually manifested its way to society in varied forms, namely the entertainment industry] less of a conspiracy and more about finger-pointing. It is a conspiracy with a two-way process that starts from the purely fictional; it’s all academic. Then, it becomes fiction as we observe those ideas in a format in which action is taken. This argument and the simulated coronavirus are the same concept but inverse. The metanarrative here is that it’s fascist-based, technocratic, and totalitarian, which is from the far-right.

Resist the evidence; in Satellization continued [Hyperreal Space vs. Waters Above]: Given the last dictum about democracy, it was more of a facade to hide and impede an imperial order – it’s also used to describe democracy as a simulation of sorts. A kind of simulation that is flexible at which the simulation stands at the top of three levels. And at the bottom is the citizens’ belief that they live in a democracy. While in the middle is this gigantic and growing corporate system. The simulation is flexible, which means the form can change. So, how do you evacuate the middle and assemble the remaining form while keeping the citizens’ belief in democracy true?  

Jean-Paul Sartre once described democracy; “it was ridiculous to die for Danzig, but it would be reasonable to die for democracy – at least, that is what they keep telling us. I am not arguing about the principle: if one doesn’t give one’s life for ‘something’, one ends up giving it for nothing. But before I die for democracy, I’d like to be certain that I live in one.” There is uncertainty towards democracy, or at least there is reason to be sceptical about the genuineness of the idea. And that’s because it has morphed into something other than what people believe it to be.

This distinction coextends with the hyperreal space simulation, which is about recognizing that the Earth is flat and that space is just a simulation. The difference between the two is one of flexibility, and the other is a backdrop for your imagination. Perceiving both simulations is also about resistance to that—not necessarily resisting democracy or the imagination but seeing through the manipulation surrounding it, namely the structure, the background, or the stage.       

We’ve discussed how morality can be simulated, especially when it lacks context, which was described definitively by Alasdair Macintyre. Another postmodernist philosopher, Baudrillard, describes scepticism in satellization. A passage titled Resist the Evidence in satellization, which by its title stands as a sort of anti-statism notion not only towards a hyperreal notion of space but any other notion of resistance concerning simulation. For example, the simulated morality of morals and values and the fear of uncertainty [which for the manager elite is known as a fear of the imagination] – which in many ways can be known as a satellization, and we should resist any notion of satellization; this is a significant parallel or link. Resisting the evidence in satellization holds an overall meaning to other resistance that parallels it. Baudrillard says:         

Resist the evidence: in satellization, he who is satellized is not who one might think. Through the orbital inscription of a spatial object, it is the planet earth that becomes a satellite, it is the terrestrial principle of reality that becomes eccentric, hyperreal, and insignificant. Through the orbital instantiation of a system of control like peaceful coexistence, all the terrestrial micro-systems are satellized and loose their autonomy. All energy, all events are absorbed by this eccentric gravitation, everything condenses and implodes toward the only micro-model of control (the orbital satellite), as conversely, in the other, biological, dimensions, everything converges and implodes on the molecular micro-model of genetic code. Between the two, in this forking of the nuclear and the genetic, in the simultaneous assumption of the two fundamental codes of deterrence, every principle of meaning is absorbed, every deployment of the real is impossible. (Baudrillard, J, n.d.)

.

“He who is satellized is not who one might think” I assume this alludes to brainwashing mechanisms, and brainwashing mechanisms tend to have a conspiracy agenda behind them. And this makes the individual conform and not question the [ritual] initiations presented to them. ‘Through the orbital inscription of a spatial object’ is about introducing the hyperreal cosmos, where the advantages of time people would ascribe to this futile simulation program. ‘It is the planet Earth that becomes a satellite; it is the terrestrial principle of reality that becomes eccentric, hyperreal, and insignificant.’ This quote affirms a heliocentric world with its principle of satellization. But, it merely affirms that if the earth is seen as a satellite, your reality becomes hyperreal. In my analysis, this can be true if one believes in the hyperreal cosmos as the basis of our reality. However, once awakened from this simulation, satellization becomes finite, immovable, and internal to our reality instead of an external cosmos that’s infinitely large and moving. And what we know as space is more in tune with the (a)ether or the waters above. It can also be argued that is where thoughts and imagination reside. 

“Through the orbital instantiation of a system of control like peaceful coexistence, all the terrestrial micro-systems are satellized and lose their autonomy.” I theorize that this quote implies that simulation as a control system acts as glue for peaceful coexistence. Still, the rule of this orbital example and the rule of the micro or the atomic universe are vastly different. And any attempt to make it similar or satellized will not work; the structure will inevitably dissolve. We know gravity is a hyperreal [theoretical] magic glue. Hypothetically, if one is to view our reality that sits on a flat disk that spins like the rule of the orbital earth, everything from matter to micro-systems will move towards the edge. By this logic, our heliocentric world will eventually reside at the top and bottom of the poles with every possible matter in it.     

“All energy, all events are absorbed by this eccentric gravitation, everything condenses and implodes toward the only micro-model of control (the orbital satellite), as conversely, in the other biological dimensions, everything converges and implodes on the molecular micro-model of genetic code.” These arguments point towards quantum mechanics and the gravitational argument that relates to our reality. An argument setup based on impossibilities, and this is the argument of general relativity and quantum mechanics. And this is a clash of incompatible descriptions of reality. In general relativity, events are continuous and deterministic, meaning that every cause matches up to a specific, local effect. In quantum mechanics, realities exist in quantum leaps in direct opposition to linear reality and hyperreal space. The double-slit experiment introduced particles as waves that act in probabilities with a specific aspect of observance [and consciousness]. Relativity gives nonsensical answers when you try to scale it down to quantum size, eventually descending to infinite values in its description of gravity. Likewise, quantum mechanics is seriously troubled when you blow it up to cosmic dimensions. 

We’ve established that hyperreal space is simulated, so we can conclude that gravity, being its determining factor, is also simulated. So, throw the theory out the window. Forget associating quantum mechanics with gravity in hopes of understanding black holes and Big Bang theories and their hyperreal notions anyway. Therefore, you can focus more on quantum mechanics [the nuclear] and the molecular micro-model of genetic code. At this point, gravity is excluded from its theoretical association, which is free to determine other factors.

Resist the evidence; in Satellization continued [Synch-X-Philosophy and the Post-modern Sleaze]: Today, to be sceptical or, more precisely, to question the pre-established structure means you’re a postmodernist – a purveyor of post-structuralism. However, those quick to label this reinvented tag onto anyone lack memory and context for that subject. So, it parallels how fundamentalists view occultism, which is always an incomplete summary. Perhaps their goal is to assume an authoritative figure for a pure reason. Because of this, it will close the mind and the imagination.

Post-structuralism [also known as deconstructionism] is not structuralism. Structuralism uncovers the structures that underlie everything humans do, think, perceive, and feel. At the same time, post-structuralism builds upon or rejects the ideas within structuralism. So, in many ways, you can view it as science, the absolute, and the uncertain. When Post-structuralism becomes controversial, it discards the idea of interpreting media (or the world) within pre-established, socially constructed structures.

This can simultaneously be a problem and not a problem, a problem for those who fear uncertainty, those who like to play gatekeepers, and those still asleep. We know reality has all but disappeared [or consensus reality has all but disappeared]. So why would you like to go on with the charade? Perhaps it’s all about keeping levels of abstraction in an equal setting. The word ‘discard’ is final, primarily when associated with grand narratives and history. The words ‘discard’ to ‘rethink’ to be open-minded perhaps about the structure that you hold dear and to be true is nothing but a simulation that the dichotomies that the government, the media, and the religious and academic institutions give you can be wrong.

Philosophers Foucault and Derrida were more deconstructionists than postmodernists. Their teachings became prominent in the late ’80s and early ’90s when post-structuralism became part of literary theory in the universities. And this was seized upon by groups advocating equal rights who misused its context to unseat the elitist male from his ivory tower [which then morphed into ‘woke’ groups]. However, it seems more of a managerial movement to realign the university system in ways that are more to the liking of some larger foundations.

Derrida referred to deconstruction as a radicalization of a particular spirit of Marxism. Without context, this could mean anything. The statement itself has a certain ambiguity. I feel this statement is where particular intellects have conjured a specific narrative from right-wing fundamentalism – a radicalization of Marxism in a singular meaning as opposed to its spirit. And this is the same backward narrative [notion] or conspiracy theory that started to rear its head from Christian-fundamentalist-conspiracy-theory-groups who voiced those opinions in radio stations and internet podcasts – before it reached any university classrooms.  

Deconstructionism and postmodernism are needed for flat-earth reasoning because deconstruction is an attempt to expose and undermine certain types of “metaphysics”, notably ones that are satellized by our simulated ‘metaphysical cosmology.’ I’ve suggested that satellization is more than mere movements of orbital objects; it acts as a symbol to impose or simulate fake evidence to be facts. This means that hyperreal space, the kind that NASA promotes, and the hyperreal space that science fiction promotes is the same. However, science fiction and the hyperreal cosmos are bound by the imagination and, therefore, are better at making certain truths. [Not the hyperreal cosmos itself, but other things] more indelible, as well as consistently updating newer conceptions or awareness that may arise in the collective.

Postmodernism [now satellized] is usually used as a label to designate large numbers of different thinkers, which means a focused critique is impossible. The misrepresentation of postmodernism and modernism is when you conflate postmodernism [with radical feminism or mistake it with post-colonial feminism when they are all about critiques of postmodernism and not postmodernism themselves]. Or to mislead memory and context by misquoting philosophers like Lyotard in his equation of power and reason, labelling postmodernism as an activist strategy against the coalition of reason and power. It’s not that the coalition of power and reason must be fought against; it is inevitable; it’s inherent to knowledge and power. It is neither good nor bad, but both.

Postmodernism does not make sense when contrasted against modernism or even medieval pre-modernism. For example, any attempts to define pre-modernism through ethics as collectivism, altruism and modernism as individualism will not work. Altruism is not an ethical theory, and neither is individualism. Postmodernism is defined by those who argue against it. Define postmodernism through forms of inverse (or reverse)-deconstructionism by claiming that it proposes outside the text and, therefore, its meaning is a form of subjective play. And this redefines postmodernism as something hyperreal, a sort of satellization. Derrida, the father of deconstructionism, opposed bringing text from the outside. He instead promoted an examination of the internal logic of the text. The pouring in of subjective associations is precisely what this prevents.    

Postmodernism was first used as an art movement that embraced many different approaches to art; the most famous was pop art. Postmodernism did not have the flexibility of Surrealism, as it was a reaction against modernism. The Modernist artist focuses their style on form, technique, and processes rather than focusing on subjects, a reflective mirror of reality or realism. That also matches their philosophy about idealism, reason, and a utopian vision. Modernists championed clarity and simplicity, while postmodernism embraced complex, often contradictory layers of meaning. Postmodernism was born out of scepticism and suspicion of reason. It challenged traditional notions of reason and claimed universal certainties or truths. Postmodern art drew on the philosophy of the mind to the late twentieth century. It advocated that individual experiences and interpretations of our experience were more concrete than abstract principles.

Postmodernism (along with abstract art and cubism) was a pre-cursor art style to surrealism, and surrealism did not have the associated political or philosophical baggage of postmodernism because the rule of subjects did not bind it. Nor is it subjected to right-wing critiques because surrealism is about desolating subjects and abolishing objects. It doesn’t associate itself with politics but rather through dreams and psychoanalysis. Surrealism is the enterprise of nothingness through an excess of being. It creates savage and magnificent forms [images], an unknown being. A state in which reality dissolves into itself and nothingness hovers around it. Through the landmarks of self-destructive objects, the spirit of surrealism resides without the restraint of imagination.

By abolishing objects, you, therefore, ‘blow up the outside world,’ a song title made famous by grunge singer Chris Cornell. And what is grunge, if not a postmodern style of music [one of a few musical revolutions to arise in two decades]? It recognises the spirit of surrealism with its nervous tension as it pursues an unrealisable intuition. Though it must be synthesised to become objective, a mysterious subjectivity looms behind it. It is also evident in the awareness of the difference between the imaginary point of dreams and wakefulness. This style would be more pronounced in the space-dream style of Deftones, a unique nu-metal style. A band that started in the mid-’90s heavily influenced by grunge and metal but would later become more hard-edged but equally embraces an uber-indie ambience. Today’s youthful influences are living off the vestiges of a grunge era.

Grunge transfixed a moment in time and stapled a generation of X’s to an era unforgotten, but Grunge had to be influenced by something as well. So don’t look further than artist-prophet and watchtower guardian of intuition and water – the Sibyl herself Cocteau Twin’s Elisabeth Fraser. Their proto-gothic/dream pop 80s style of music, notably Heaven or Las Vegas, heavily influenced Nirvana’s sound. Fraser would use words phonetically by abandoning their literal meanings and converting them to syllables. For example, in the song ‘Ivo’, she writes: ‘peep-bo, peachblow; pandour, pompadour.’ Fraser’s voice acts as an instrument, adding textures with its heavenly quality. Together with their noisy punk rock style, they would imbue the folk spectre of a pop band cloaked in walls of reverb sounds complete with muscular baseline intertwined with other invoking sounds overlaid with Fraser sighing vocals. 

They would later influence other music styles. One, in particular, came about by putting a drum box through fuzz pedals and guitar amps, where hip-hop would later adopt the same method. That technique would inspire the sound of mid-80s Synth-wave/pop. The most inspired musical styles they would influence would be dream-pop and shoegaze. From dream-pop bands like Sugarcubes [Bjork], Mazzy Star, Lush, the Sundays, and so on – to shoegaze bands like Jesus and Mary Chain, My Bloody Valentine, Slowdive, etc. Lastly, they would inspire the mid-90s sound of Trip-Hop, the pre-cursor style of the uber-indie format. Fraser herself would be a guest vocal to Massive Attack’s ‘Teardrop.’ The song has an eerie synchronistic metanarrative regarding her consort, Jeff Buckley. 

Trip-hop was also a defining sound for the 90s, much like grunge was for alternative rock. All thanks to generation tagged with X. Trip-hop band Sneaker Pimps put out an album called ‘Becoming X’ in which a particular song, ‘how do’ Kelli Ali, the singer, channels the Siren moans the Sybil spirit. Ali would later be let go from the group, which was a shame because songs like ‘How Do’ tap into the spirit of surrealism.

.

She also released a music video called post-modern sleaze, where the video’s narrative is about being on the run from southern conservative cops. And this seems to answer an ever-growing uneducated view on socialism and Marxism that somehow it’s a conspiracy plot. And this was promoted by Christian fundamentalist groups. And in that era, notions of equality and LGBT rights were marginalized. It was an era fresh from the Rodney King riots, a riot that had the hallmarks of genuineness as opposed to ritualized hoaxes. This was a time when there was an imbalance in societal perspectives where that favoured certain groups – especially those that had links to a secret clandestine organization whose punitive association was modelled out of fascist racism made anew in the far-right of southern United States. Fast forward to today, and the radical left is held up as a moustache-twirling villain in a republican mindset. It’s where politically correct ideals are being pushed – a speeding up of sorts, and for what purpose? Much of it is reactionary and needs to be forgotten, making it sound like it’s coming from that clandestine group [this is the meta-morphing of opposites mentioned in the last post].

Much of it lies in the spectrum of media; go to any small town, and these P.C. ideas still need to be made available. Of course, you can claim it’s a cult, but it’s just politically correct ideas being pushed without restraint. This is probably due to the ever-growing apocalypse and the ever-growing speed of the technical information age.               

Uber-indie groups would emerge from trip-hop, from the likes of Charlie XCX – while Deftones singer Chino’s side project called Crosses [their logo depicts three crucifixes [or XXX] – an Orion constellation reference to the Three Kings]. At the same time, the group Chvrches logo has three horizontal dashes on top of each other, symbolizing Hiram Abiff, which is tied to the Cairo symbol of Christ. Artist Dot Alison’s album ‘We are Science’ has a track called ‘Hex’; another group is called ‘The xx’. And lastly, Trashique Grimes x Hana does a cover [dark comes] for the uber-indie group Canadian twins and songwriters Tegan and Sara from their album ‘The Con X: covers.’

From those lists, Grimes comes to mind, whose husband is Elon Musk, the CEO of the hyperreal-space institution SpaceX. There are attempts to keep the hyperreal space travel simulation going in hopes of reaching/ritualising Planet X or other constellations, notably Sirius or Lyra. It’s all about rituals and worshipping altars. He also names his child ‘X Æ A-Xii’, a symbolic name signifying the number 12, which coextends to the revelation 12 cycles. This is another recycled myth [or be it slightly different] of the Demiurge and Sophia story with the creation of life in the heavens and earth. There are 12 significant constellations among the many heavenly stars that Demiurge [Dragon] creates. In worshipping this ritual, their child role-plays the soon-to-be ruler of those 12 constellations. In ancient times, [elites] kings and generals took guidance from oracles or Sibyls.

This leads me back to part five of this thesis collection, where I mentioned that ‘X marks the spot for the Pearly Dewdrop’s Drops, which hinted at a location: the centre of the earth once known as Atlantis, and possibly at an earlier stage once known as Mount Olympus [Mount Meru]. The centre was topographically illustrated as a target and cross symbolizing the four seas or ‘X’. Four seas refer to four sections of the island separated by four rivers intersected by the middle centre.

The cross has many religious connotations. It’s also used in magic. Wiccans use each point of reference to coincide with the four elements that each sister complements.

.

This place or Dewdrop refers to a story in Homer’s Odyssey about the World Axis [the stories revolve around the Centre or the Navel]. I will discuss this in the next post. This association regards this overall thesis; if you strip away the satellization aspect, those stories make more sense.

.

.

Flat Earth; Enclosed Creationism; Conspiracy (Theory), Intuition and Imagination – Part Nine

.

.

---

.

Act Four: Returning to the Source [taken from the philosophy of the matrix, with added parts – Posted initially on 18th June 2020]: The last act plays on the subsequent history of humanity and the gradual recovery of the elements of the perfect light. The spiritual realm is gradually returning to become one from where it once belonged. The final story is that everything returns to the one (Source), and the imperfect mistake disappears. Consequently, there is no end to this cosmic play; the four-act play is merely archetypal timeless key-frames in what seems to be a play that never ends. As the play continues, we make history. However, the soul will inevitably return to its Source for the individual.

Fundamentalism’s expectation of prophecy of the One (messiah), the son of Man who dies and gets resurrected, and does miracles are Christian notions that began in Gnostic traditions. They frame the fundamental human problem regarding ignorance, the solution being enlightenment. While the orthodox sect frames it as sin and repentance, it is really a system built upon guilt and shame, which can be used as a selfish construct; the effectiveness of this narcissistic construct is evident in the whole sociological environment.

In revelation, it suggests that the Man in the Sky, which we know as the first Adam, Horus, or Jesus (the Logos, the messiah, or the One), would be revealed at the beginning of the end. And if he is the first and the last – it points to a fundamentalist notion that the Man in the Sky will return. However, before the return of Christ, the anti-Christ will appear first – then, a great battle of Armageddon will ensue. After that, the second coming of Christ would appear and herald a victory over the dark forces. And this means apocalyptic doomsday for humanity, as this cosmic birth pain takes place; He will embark on a vast cosmic reincarnation or a cosmic eternal return. This would then be followed by the (millennium) one thousand-year rule of Christ, where the last judgment will begin before the world’s end. After that, it will bring forth a new heaven and Earth.

The new Earth also aligns with the conception of the new age of Aquarius, which insists history will end. This thinking is what the Buddhists call impermanence. This is natural as one’s life’s journey begins; it must also end at some point. Impermanence can also relate to field good schemes that don’t last, like the new age notions of thinking positively. It can also relate to political schemes, which have limitations exemplified in World War Two and the Nazi regime. Also, socialism and the Soviet Union have all broken down in one way or another. These political schemes were driven by a final judgment mindset slightly different from the end of the world but the end of history. Having inspired by the secularist Marxist and neo-Hegelians, which the evolutionary concept of Darwin had influenced – that history is moving towards something (worldly) and that something is the end of history. After that, there is no more development.

The apocalyptic alarm to the end of the world and the vision of the golden living dream of Aquarius – are inspired by the perception of the end of time or history. Historical time has only really been taken seriously by Mediterranean and monotheistic civilizations that bore Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. The truism for highly abstract metaphysics, as well as theological concepts and their doctrines, lie at the back of this circumstance and is very much a religious concept. Comparatively, scientism has the same notion that involves the universe breaking apart, stars journeying towards the edge of the cosmos to where it will inevitably fade away or break apart to a nothingness void. Our concept of history within time is grounded – in the idea that the world has all been created at a particular time (or at the beginning of history). From then on, historical time continues in linearity but will eventually end.           

What distinguishes fundamentalists is their delusion that they can capture something unquantifiable while attempting to interpret these uncertainties with religious policies for political schemes. Unfortunately, these unquantifiable uncertainties are abstractions—and abstractions only exist to be held in mind. They have a habit of acting like a virus that can deceive, but only if you let them.         

This fundamental problem parallels the interpretation found in the Apocryphon of John. It describes our souls being trapped in a material body and needing to escape. Given how the world is set up through various social engineering modes, which are essentially types of simulations, it makes us feel trapped. It can also match the Buddhist term samsara, which is about how we perceive our world in which ignorance is the problem, and the solution is awakening—achieved through knowledge.   

However, one of Demiurge’s objectives is to keep us in a reality of his making a simulacrum of his design. This repurposing programmer hides the true reality with a false one. Some have equated this true reality to the Pleroma. Moreover, the Demiurge; the Architect and Creator-God of this dimensional reality – wants to deny knowledge to all humanity. His Agents/Angels implemented levels of hierarchies garnered through people’s choices that often led to blind submission to authority. People that play their roles so blindly to a point they become trapped in their construct, which has a habit of influencing people’s minds to rigid thinking that gives purpose to institutionalized control. In this case, being awake merely means being aware of those social and political constructs in which people are entangled.  

Although there is more to blind obedience to authority, which is about creating choices and decisions, to break away from the herd mentality, man will overcome man and become uber-man (a spiritual evolution in man that ignites in the gestation of enlightenment). And this parallels the notion of God becoming man so that Man can become God. Nietzsche’s philosophy describes certain types of people locked in their constructs. Those born into systems of evaluation in which one thing is good, and the other is bad must do this and do that. What defines the hero (Heru, overman, ubermensch, or Superman) is that he rejects all of those constructs. He doesn’t give them force; he sees through them and decides to use his own will, his sense of volition.

Denying these constructs plays on the notion of Schopenhauer’s mindless desire. In his book Will and Representation, he discusses how human experience is subjective and that the only grounding you can come to is human will or human choice. Schopenhauer’s view describes our perception. Our consciousness is the physical brain seen from the inside. What seems external in the perception of causality with all its corresponding impulses is combined into one vast will.  

Schopenhauer’s Will and Representation has hints of monism. The underlying philosophical argument against oneness philosophy is the standing concern regarding the New Testament when viewed through a protestant interpretative context, free will and grace, a deep philosophical problem. And that’s because, in one aspect, things have to be a certain way, but on the other hand, they can’t. 

Determinism states that everything that exists or occurs has a cause, and that cause makes the effect inevitable. Combine those two claims, and it becomes a problem for free will. If we know every position of an atom at the moment, we can predict the next instant – an omniscient that has a snapshot of the universe in an instant. We can, therefore, predict the future because what happens at every moment is simply the deterministic outcome of the interactions of those small parts. Modern physicists say quantum indeterminacy is wrong, even if that’s true; at the macroscopic level, things seem to be determined in many regards. 

Then there is causality; casualty is like figuring out what gravity is. The result is often indefinable and immeasurable, but it’s constant, and what goes up must come down. However, with all its mystery, gravity is not consistent, given the buoyant force is the opposite of density. And this means density causes objects to fall, not gravity pulling them down. The pulling of forces is like consciousness; it needs a stage/body to rise. So, in one aspect, choice and free will seem like an illusion, but only as much as a certainty for gravity can be elusive. An outside force drives this illusion of choice – a sensory perception has given us the illusion of free will. This indeterminate-determinism aspect of free will is a paradox but remedied by seeing through the illusion. Seeing the illusion (or the process of enlightenment) forms the basis of Eastern religion, which has existed for centuries. And if one entertains the idea that having choices is already pre-determined – a more profound question to ask is why you made those choices. There is also a deep intuitive need to realise your identity with the All / Source point / Pleroma / Brahman, etc. Most people know they carry a spiritual reality intuitively, but that’s not enough; it’s only ever complete when you wake up.

Rationality can’t solve the problem brought about by these inherent simulated sociological situations (hoaxes, events, wars, greed, and so on); otherwise, society would have collapsed by now. You start by recognizing the limits of our knowledge; this sets the foundation for beginning to remedy those conditions beset upon us. Coupled with being awake, one begins their hero’s journey to a spiritual path to feel true enlightenment, given how we’ve established that Jesus is a hypothetical fractal simulation and simulacrum update of Horus. One can conclude the Christ figure is not an unrepeatable, non-fungible individual but something determined by the need for creation. The Man in the Sky Model is merely a particular iteration of a soul/self-type, ‘the one’ which may seem like a role only for the gods. However, it’s a universal type, as the spark, which is ‘love’, was the ingredient that made the first Man comes to life, which is in everyone. 

The awareness of love is the ultimate reality; it drives and motivates us. It’s no coincidence that most world traditions discuss love through abstract terms but concretize it. Not in terms of human love but divine love (cosmic consciousness), the highest love that can attain divinity. Love is what holds Nirvana and Samsara together. Love can conquer all. Love is something more than what rationality can give. Once it has attained love/light/awake-ness, something more opens up: intuition, synchronicities, perception, a kind of spiritual experience that comes in a flash. You essentially become aware or are in tune with the higher reality.      

Revelation’s apocalyptic theme is about impermanence and the acknowledgment of the one that will appear at the beginning and the end. We can view the end of time/history through the notion of love, light, the good being attained before death, and the good being one’s heroic journey to disseminate truth throughout the world. The reveal of Christ at the end of time is Christ-consciousness in mind, revealed in one’s lifetime. This is the literal Oil of Angels or the Oil from the claustrum. A brain fluid known as the Christos comes from the cerebrum descends the spinal cord and reaches the sacral plexus next to the sacrum, which is connected. This sacrum is five fused bones that pump the oil back up, and when the oil returns, we have illumination. The light of enlightenment will overcome the shadow through internal means, shining through the darkness of illusions.

The eternal return is journeying to the underworld and returning to the light. We all come from the truth, the light, and the good. And we have fallen onto these ladders of material. And we need to climb back up to where we came from. Enlightenment to the true nature of reality is the solution in and itself – a spiritual practice, by taking psychedelia, or through the graces of the Pleroma-God [or God to adhere to traditional-Christians readers]. We can see or peek at that unnamable D/Tao and learn that it’s honest, dreams, insight, and prophecy in a way you didn’t understand before.

Primary Jewish mysticism, Cabala, explains that in the beginning, God creates a supernal light, a divine light, not sunlight. These lights are contained in vessels, and the Shivera or the shattering cannot contain the light. The pieces scatter everywhere, releasing this light into the universe as sparks. This fundamental problem in Jewish mysticism is that these sparks must be reconstituted and returned to divinity.

Schopenhauer describes the manifest world as our physical reality, while outside it lies a more profound realm of actual existence. This deeper reality is perceptible by other planets, representing different dimensional planes. Within these planes, infinite parallel dimensions exist. Beyond all these dimensions and planes is the Pleroma, also called Nirvana, Moksha, and the Eternal Unnamable Tao. Perceiving these concepts remains unknowable until the material body’s death. Only upon death can the spirit be resurrected. However, before this can happen, the awakened individual must dissolve their ego to achieve immortality and prepare for reunion with the greater whole.

Act Four: The Meta Morphing of Opposites:  A particular part of the United States, predominately the South – has been exceptionally versed in Conspiracy Theory, the Paranormal, Ufology, Religion, etc. And for decades, radio stations like Coast to Coast have conditioned certain parts of the populace with fantastical other-worldly notions and theories. And most of them tend to lean towards a Republican political mindset, which is the Liberal Party in Australia, which is right-leaning. Australia’s Labor Party is the Democrats in the United States, which are left-leaning, and the U.S.’s version of a Liberal Party is Australia’s version of the Greens. However, these two main political polarities are not transfixed in their position of goals and policies and usually morph between their opposites. In both countries, liberalism is detached from its original meaning.   

Living in Australia, I could only capture the last five years of Coast to Coast (a widely popular radio station in the southern United States); it was broadcast in Australia when the pronouncement of the internet. In its early decades, Art Bell was behind the microphone. George Nory now holds the microphone. Disseminating esoteric subjects for decades towards the mainstream, how does an overall truth become integral to the individual? When you have a massive demographic of the populace proficient in conspiracy theory and UFO subjects that are united, especially on anything concerning a far-right Christendom that diverges into fundamentalism ideology? Whatever their notion of truth may be, they have a political mouthpiece now in the form of a leader who can cater to their ideals.

A strange political landscape never seen before, it’s still a psychological operation, but we are all willing to ignore that and prop up any mouthpiece as a hero for good. The notion of liberalism in Australia is pretty much Conservative, much like the United States. In 2019, Australia’s election outcome came about through Australia’s version of the United States Conservative followers, who all have shared perspectives on nationalism, Christian Values, individualism, and anti-communism. She also defended perceived threats from socialism, authoritarianism, and moral relativism. This sense of irrational fear helped determine the outcome of the votes. Their backward notion of socialism defined through communism lifted a campaign promoting that ignorance.

The search for genuine liberalism in Australia is non-existent and only stands as a reminder of what it was once. Alfred Deakin holds this idea as a symbolic reminder (minus the racism and protectionism aspect). In early Australian political history, he supported the rights of trade unions to organise and campaigned for better factory conditions. Aspects of genuine liberalism must hold the willingness to protect minority rights and the recognition that open markets are the best way to boost prosperity. His party’s issues soon matched the labour cause, but labour members still needed to make a common cause. Throughout the years, the liberals and the conservatives (the Labor Party’s ideal, which is Liberal Conservatism) would become a united front together. This union no longer exists in current political modernity, making labour the only party fully committed to the liberal notion. Labor’s central tenet is egalitarianism, which holds inequality as its primary goal to absolve. So, they introduced Medicare, superannuation, and National Disability Insurance schemes, which were drawn from aspects of liberalism. Labour is the party that introduced laws to ban discrimination by race and sex. Native title laws came about under a Labor government despite fierce opposition from the other side. You can use examples from the United States’ political history and current political climate. 

The political morphing of opposites seems naturally unavoidable throughout time, which gives it a natural quality. The notion of the morphing of opposites came about through Baudrillard, J – who describes the “meta-morphing of opposites to perpetuate itself in its censored form”, a notion regulated through parody. Though it would seem it comes about naturally. And this somewhat relates to the dual opposites found in T/Daoism. This notion is also used as a means of manipulation through psychological operations (hoaxes and false flags) to confuse the masses, often with the help of mainstream media.

These colliding interests can make any notion of truth murky and conflicted in mainstream, alternative, and conspiracy truth groups. It is not just a conflict related to dialectical ideologies that conflict with two opposing truths or conspiracy. At the same time, it is essential, but so is the conflict within their groups. Truth and conspiracy exist in a world where the good does not exist in a positive conscience way; this is hard to grasp when the truth is defined as an awakening (spiritual adoption of the word truth). Or when you realise how feudalistic government is, when deep down you know the Left does an excellent job doing the work of the Right.

Therefore, in this world of a matrix (simulation), one cannot exist actively or passively; consequently, one must view it in a way that is fractal, a spiral of causality in which positivity and negativity are generated, and in this pool of generated things – those things will overlap. This principle also relates to manipulation. Manipulation is always transient in its approach. Within the pool of generated things, we can view and determine those things in the spiral pool without prejudice. This model or perspective can calculate the act or the event within this perspective. Through their narrow, unconventional field, the perspective of the knower, the outsider, or the awakened can be maintained, even when they’re described as ‘ wackadoo conspiracy theorists.’ The pronouncement of this influence or hidden, symbolic messaging doesn’t come from Christian-conspiracy-theorist; they’re only bad interpreters of something larger at play. Isaac Newton and his work on anagrams were about deciphering symbolic meaning (anagrams) throughout humanity’s play (or game); a researcher inserted science behind outrageous theories. This leaves the notion of needing sources, peer review, and evidence redundant (or unimportant) because the evidence is apparent within the spiral pool.

An example of where it can emerge from is numbers like numerology and its unifying code theory – predictive programming and synchronicities. Both physically and spiritually (I’m sure clairvoyants predicated 9/11 or even the collective seeing it in a dream in some form of an archetypal image; pop culture manifests its predictive programming). And are often implanted by the audacity of agents of an un-original simulator (the established order/elite). All institutions define themselves through denial, attempting to simulate truth and escaping the (absolute) truth. The proof through the anti-[…] and, in this case, the anti-Truther/Conspiracy-theorist-Christians – the anti-[…] has become normalised and is pivotal in determining political hierarchies. These strategies are about the non-rediscovery of the possibility of absolute truth through an illusion and, in this case, through the political problem of dual opposites that often merge naturally. Though it comes naturally, you can capture the process itself and thus can use the illusion to manipulate.

Parody’s political problem is natural to metamorphosing opposites. The Australian government attempted to outlaw any parody surrounding political figures, which shows how Australia is becoming more conservative. Something is outside the scope of potential human intelligence. The media acts as a regenerator for that intelligence by diluting the truth. The people and media are engaged in social engineering and use conventional media and social (media) to embed esoteric symbolism. Any notion of staging an illusion seems too difficult to believe among the ordinary public. However, those aware of the manipulation also know that reality is an illusion and, therefore, can conclude that the illusion is no longer possible. Therein lies the problem with Parody. In general terms, Parody renders submissions and transgressions, and if an event is indeed a hoax or a simulation, people would assume its truth, then it’s placed in a reality that we call the ‘real’. The concept cancels itself out because the law it relies on becomes impossible to uphold. This can also be illustrated by the degradation of truth through memes, often structured as parodies. As a result, the implicit message is rarely questioned due to this structure. There’s certain rigidity in how it’s presented—while truth can be reshaped, it often remains unexamined because of how it is communicated.  

In Gnostic theology, a theory describes how we might live in a world that’s a bit flawed due to a lesser creator, God/architect/intelligence, who emerged by accident. Due to this imperfection, the creator left traces or fingerprints on the world. Those who interpret these signs, i.e. fingerprints or synchronicities, also write the events as co-creators and align with magic. This differs from the hero’s role and is more in tune with the prophet or the attendant spirit, the helper or guardian angel. Moreover, the assistance archetype proposes a simulacrum theory.

Simulacrum theory attempts to reconcile old millennial stories embedded with a singular message working within inspired creative human faculties. This is like Schopenhauer’s notion of one vast will, likened to oneness. Synchronicities’ version of one vast will points to unified synchronicities (or works their way to unification). Simulation theory is not a debasement of the objective reason but rather a thought experiment, like the thought experiment that is the theory of evolution, which, in some aspects of the theory, can be false in its grand narrative. Any other thought experiment surrounding human nature that may come to pass – aside from what we have is not to be feared. And that’s because the biggest criticizer of human nature has already taken that spot. Darwin’s evolution and society have already gone through the totalitarian aspect of it.    

Baudrillard’s notion of hyper-reality or simulations is detailed in his book “Simulacra and Simulation,” which is a continental or postmodern philosophy. The postmodern condition describes reality as all but disappearing, or the world is, in some ways, a construction of the mind (or reality existing only in your subjective experience). Leading into this abstraction was first laid out through the foundation of Descartes, who invented modernity. Then Kant proposed that the mind has structures that impose structures onto the world, so we do not perceive a pre-given world, but the structure of the mind brings forth phenomena. And this is created as much by the mind and whatever is out there. Kant convinced himself that there was something beyond causes. This is reasonable because we don’t control our phenomenon; if I look at the sky, I cannot change it from blue to pink. Something out there generates these sense perceptions and gives them to us. This notion has merit given its reason to observable facts and stands as an antithesis to oneness philosophy, or at least further analysis is needed.

Postmodernism is an extrapolation of what you get from Kant. It is comparable to conspiracy theorists, but for intellects – maybe this is an oversimplification, but it’s under threat by liberal/conservative intellects that undervalue it. Postmodernism explores phenomena and is open to infinite alternative accounts, while conspiracy theorists seize the same opportunity. However, it falls victim to its claim and purchase of “truth” through its self-created discourse. By dismissing the “truth” presented by established institutions, conspiracy theorists explain their version of “truth”. However, both opposing factions are discourses, and the Conspiracy Theory mirrors the account of the Liberal Government. This government is no longer liberal but deeply conservative in its formation of truth.

Given that the majority of followers of conspiracy theories are Republicans (conservatives), the very nature of conspiracy theory is to be sceptical. How does one call oneself a conservative with a rigid view on postmodernism when a conservative majority populace is all about scepticism? Or maybe postmodernism is a threat to them because they’re holding on to an old ideal of Liberalism that no longer exists under its liberal banner but lives on in their counterpart. And perhaps postmodernism asks you to be self-aware and open to other sources of interpretations and, therefore, spirituality, which doesn’t necessarily adopt dogma, i.e. Gnosticism (open-source spirituality). So, denying postmodernism is akin to fundamentalists denying other world saviours.  

So, we’ve established that morphing opposites is natural. At the same time, its base ideology can be used to manipulate through unquantifiable uncertainties. That fuels the imagination, which acts like a virus. However, we are made to believe there is only a left and right interpretation when it’s really both. This is a Hegelian trap that people must get over.

The polarization of left and right duality is the central pillar of both sides of the Shekinah or the Tree of Life. In the god-body, Kether is the crown with the Binah and Chokmah rounding of the Trinity. Binah and Chokmah represent the left and right – the shoulders of the god-body, equating to the good Angel and evil demon depicted in narrative stories (animated cartoons), often whispering in the shoulders of the main character. The left and right can also represent the twins. In the last post, I outlined the resurrection process concerning the incarnation process of explaining the soul and the soul travelling to her twin. As the body dies, the soul propels upwards, illustrated in the third season of Twin Peaks. A scene in which a boy gets run over by a car, and then a witness sees the spectral phenomenon leaving the boy’s body and rising upwards to the sky. The soul would essentially go through the light bridge; this light bridge is called Datt, a hidden aspect within the central pillars of the Shekinah.

The perplexing worldviews of both Grant Morrison and Jordan Peterson are examples of such polarities, which are the antithesis of each other. Their base worldview is clearly in their extreme (left and right), but as hard as they try to keep it in their position. The natural quality of morphing opposites comes to light, meaning any attempts to explain their position cannot hold firm. 

Grant Morrison – disinformation lecture on magic(k)
Left – thinking [in terms of Political Dualities left & right]	Right – thinking[in terms of Political Dualities left & right]
Describes absolutism in Orthodoxy [religious or otherwise] or any sense of Binary extremes as an attempt to prop up individualism as a way to separate man and his nature.   The individual is an illusion, a kind of conditioning that’s implanted in us. With the likes of Kafka and Orwell, who valued individualism, they used their doctrine to make us believe it’s essential – but what if you ask yourself that it may not be as important?	We, as the counterculture types, have dabbled in psychedelic drugs and broken a few rules but generally hate the police.     We create the police but hate them despite us (the people) putting them in those roles.   In retrospect, we should love the police.

.

Grant Morrison describes Nazism during World War Two as something we had to go through, a dark part of humanity that’s never going to happen again, but it had to happen. We had to go through it. Everything that is evil and every image of hell emerged. The world was a wasteland, cities destroyed, people annihilated, and why did it happen? Grant Morrison describes why, through the individual’s fallacy, the individual is an illusion, a kind of conditioning implanted in us. The likes of Kafka and Orwell, who valued individualism, used their doctrine to make us believe it’s important, but what if you ask yourself that it may not be as important? When you discuss or deal with the individual, you realise it’s filled with neurosis due to how the ego structure is constructed through what Julian James calls the bicameral mind when the mind becomes one.

According to him, back in the ancient world, people didn’t have self-consciousness the way we do; they didn’t have egos, nor was the concept of “I” unheard of due to the corpus callosum limiting the brain’s two hemispheres. So, hearing voices would mean hearing the voice of God. Julian suggests that the voice of the left hemisphere communicating with the brain’s right hemisphere can be interpreted as a god. Now we have the bridge, but we still have the ego structure created when the bridge wasn’t there; now we know of the “I am that I am,” but we still think we are separated from everything, from nature and ourselves. We are stuck in the individual because we believe in it so much.

Denying the individual is not entirely the answer either because what you’re left with would be akin to collectivism, or it starts to merge into something similar. Think of the Borg in Star Trek, with the ‘one mind, one hive’ mentality. [like I said in part seven of this thesis collection, that] it’s not about his unintentional approach to monism by using the concept of individualism as something nefarious, but about how magic can influence the synchronistic whole within space and time – and how we are seemingly connected.

He used the story of his alien-abduction experience as an allegory in his comic book writings, of how we are like ‘lava’ created by the maker. And he saw lava grow out of these dimensional beings, which exist outside space and time. They watch and observe the human condition as it’s the only way to observe space and time. He says if we look into our human condition backward in time, it’s always going back into itself – so far back as to reach the source point or the birth of life. Eventually, it will go through the very micro (not to be mistaken for the Big Bang theory as false, but the birth of life going back to the original human). People have forgotten this because they believe they’re separate from nature.

Moreover, we try to control it by building square cities, controlling weather patterns, and geo-engineering. We are like coral plants with different individual heads connected to one Oversoul. We are connected to the Oversoul or Gaia but with our individuality intact. However, Morrison is implying that the individual has taken over, and we cut ourselves apart (which is essentially the Lucifer effect) from the Oversoul. This result is one of many fundamental reasons for the seemingly pre-determined outcome that we are heading into, driven by the established elite.

It’s not about eliminating the individual but the relationship between ethics and responsible individualism. Yes, we are living from the results of the old ego structure, but the ego structure is the structure of the game or perhaps the nervous system. This structure was formed throughout the ages, and stepping outside while hoping for change is illegitimate because you have isolated yourself from that structure. All this unpleasantness resulting from the old ego structure destroys personal lives and families. However, suppose you believe in change, spiritual growth, and democracy and believe legitimacy lies with the people or the responsible collective whole. In that case, you must be part of the old ego structure, and then you can cultivate a new one within the old one.

While Morrison identifies individualism as a conspiracy – his antithesis, Jordan Peterson- he describes postmodernism as a conspiratorial Marxist plot to undermine individualism. Both can be correct and incorrect simultaneously; given the apparent paradox, one must view it through the basis of Daoism that it’s neither, but a distraction Hegelian blame game between the left and right when an Oligarchy is to be blamed – a Hydra with its tentacles of power reaching into every institution and every establishment. The peak of the power pyramid is not concerned with left and right but uses both. This means notions of Postmodernist conspiracy stemming from a so-called radical left are no more valid than the conspiracy of individualism guise as nationalism – when totalitarianism is the plot. Both points are wrong because the conspiracy plot comes from a higher order.  

Peterson defines postmodernism as a tool for great social transformation that can manifest itself in many places. Reducing it to a set number of principles is very difficult, and any attempt to define it is an oversimplification. Yet he proceeds to do so through a very narrow field – with the added component of postmodernism having some allegiance with Marxism. He describes postmodernism as an attitude of scepticism. They do share a narrative, and that’s through one group trying to dominate another group, but this happens a lot. It’s not necessarily through Marxist ideals because that would mean attempting to encompass Marxism collectively when such oppression is through criminal capitalism, which is different to capitalism, that the collective already sees as a credible utility. [To describe oppression in society as somehow “Marxist” would mean right-libertarians who discuss state and crony capitalists coercing the general public are “Marxist”; even evangelicals (minus the conspiracy theory crowd) are oppressed by powerful liberal elites are “Marxist.” Peterson defines “postmodernism” too narrowly and then uses “Marxism” in such a loose manner that it means nothing. https://notesonliberty.com/]

He describes postmodernism as a Marxist plot that’s self-evident through the works of Derrida and Foucault. [He wants to claim that postmodernism is this pernicious, all-encompassing threat that has consumed all of the humanities and social sciences, which hates Western civilization. He then defines postmodernism so narrowly that it merely describes the views of Foucault. [https://notesonliberty.com/] – The link between the two is merely genealogical. Many thinkers who typify postmodernism were Marxists, communists, or were otherwise involved in radical leftist politics at one point in their lives. Foucault, Lyotard, D&G, Baudrillard, etc., state that postmodernism is a reaction against Marxism’s dominance within French academia. Marxists since have generally been pretty anti-postmodernism.

A ton of the views he champions (a pragmatic theory of truth, a respect for Nietzsche’s use of genealogy, a naturalist emphasis on the continuity between animals and humans, etc.) are all views that are often called “postmodern” depending on how broadly one understands “incredulity towards meta-narratives,” and at the very least were extremely influential over most postmodern philosophers and echoed in their work. https://notesonliberty.com/ 

At certain times, Peterson breaks his own rules, similar to politicians who advocate for significant policies and then lie about how those policies get implemented. He has described himself as both a Liberal and a Conservative, yet he also claims to be neither, stating that he lacks the temperament for either because he is creative. He is quoted as being “a great sceptic of well-meaning attempts to adjust large social systems based on ideology.” Doesn’t this statement lean toward postmodernism?

Jordan Peterson – Identity Politics & The Marxist Lie of White Privilege
Right – thinking[in terms of Political Dualities left & right]	Left  –thinking[in terms of Political Dualities left & right]
Intersectionality has emerged within the postmodernist corpus because the theorists themselves understand that people differ on infinite dimensions.   This is why the West invented the concept of individualism. If you fractionate groups to the ultimate atomic level, you end up with the individual. You have to treat the individual as a unique nexus of factors.	Christ [Logos] was the human imagination’s attempt to represent the “perfect man” and is, therefore, of more ethical value than every other domain of human thought.   Even though the human imaginations in question were those of ancient but impressively genocidal Jews and 1st-century Mediterranean livestock wranglers.

.

The political left holds society and culture through Ethics and community; he wants that for the political right but has to contend with it being on the left.

Morrison’s evaluation of the corpus callosum must be more extensive to find a better context, perhaps due to a short lecture. And Peterson’s interview with Iain McGilchrist fills in what is missing. Iain wrote a book called ‘the master and the Emissary’, which describes the relationship between the left and right hemispheres of the brain. He describes the brain’s right hemisphere as the more dominant, which he calls ‘the master’ – the right hemisphere is more reliable, sees more, and understands more than the left hemisphere, which he describes as a high-functioning bureaucrat (the emissary). The master and the emissary assert that the master can’t do everything and delegate it to the emissary. With the understanding that it must not get involved with specific points of view; otherwise, it loses what was captured.

The Corpus Callosum that Morrison discussed briefly inhabits the other hemisphere because, over time, the two hemispheres had to specialize and become more selective because it enables the two to be distinguished. Of course, they have to work together to avoid having the same individual roles; a differentiation aspect is important for the two roles to work together. Inhibition is one way of distinguishing these aspects so effectively. The two roles take on the world that the hemisphere has but are only sometimes compatible. And not being aware of that because there is a level below consciousness. There is a meta-control centre that brings them together. So, in the ordinary experience, we don’t feel we’re in two different worlds, but effectively, we are. We have other qualities, goals, values, and meaning to the world.

The right hemisphere opens possibilities, whereas the left wants to close it to certainty. This is similar to Peterson’s Chaos and Order concept; chaos and order are necessary for order and balance. Peterson describes standing on the borders of order and chaos as a good idea. Iain elaborates that for anything to come into existence there needs to be an element of resistance. And things are never predicated on one pole of what is always a dipole. Certain assumptions are that certain things are good and others are bad, and getting rid of the bad is as detrimental as pursuing the good things so far that they become deficient. There is a need to be wary of left-brain certainties because it blocks out certain anomalies that the right brain detects – the right hemisphere pauses on those certainties and instead imposes a question or query that can come from insight. That could explain a better understanding. Hence, there is a propensity for theories to be updated with those anomalies included.                 

You can find meaning by being open to uncertainty as much as you can tolerate being in an unstable position. And meaning through instinct or intuition makes you aware that you’ve balanced your left hemisphere with the open capacity of the right hemisphere – making you both aware while simultaneously expanding it. One could ultimately view determinism in this regard, where you can define its indeterminate aspect through time. Where time is a static slice that God has determined, and everything is just unfolding. At the same time, things are unfolding to the effect with an overall direction, alongside intuition that aligns with the co-creator aspect, which inevitability plays a role in determining the outcome.

There has to be a need to question the notion of hierarchies through biology and naturalism as a reason to justify inequality and, therefore, criminal/global capitalism. The basis for grounding reason in nature as anchors to validate dominant power is akin to fundamentalism and its absolutes. Peterson’s evaluation of postmodernism is singular and, therefore, only partial to the whole; he also repeats the notion of hierarchies through biology as a reason to single out postmodernism through moral ethics. However, where is the middle line regarding morality, given morality needs to be invented to mean anything?  

Peterson’s evaluation of postmodernism through Foucault and Derrida’s works is problematic, but postmodernism doesn’t start and end there. And I would argue that some of the problems he recognises within those teachings are New Age philosophical contentions, which esoteric scholars have been parsing out for decades.  

Peterson’s Marxist critique is solely focused on one aspect of history, notably through the Soviets under Stalin, which used Marxism and claimed to be Marxists – as well as other varying supplementary examples from that [the ongoing anomaly that is North Korea]. This strand of interpretation or understanding of Marxism during the Cold War ceased to be relevant in 1989. Marks died around 150 years ago, but his ideas spread throughout other countries with different cultures, histories, politics, and economics, all interpreted in distinctive ways. There is no Marxism in a singular sense. The assumption of identity politics coming from a so-called radical left is perplexing because he also imparts cultural Marxism (Cultural Bolshevism) to the argument, which is a far-right argument. Cultural Marxism has no actual application in Marxist theory; the closest cultural Marxismß got to actual Marxismß is determining how culture played a role in Capitalism (economic and cultural analysis). There is merit in suggesting that Marxism and the ensuing notion of identity politics originated through Christian theology’s narrative with a significant focus on eschatology, not Marxism itself. The Christian idea is that the marginalised will triumph in the end, and in the kingdom of God, the last will become the first and the last.    

Maybe there is an attempt for a conspiratorial decent of culture, but this doesn’t come from the left – the left is only the chosen mode from which the tyrannical tentacle decides to attach itself – It comes from somewhere else. Everything left of where right-thinkers are about fear or loathing, so they focus on the identitarian aspect of how democrats hijack identity politics to sell the same ideas and institutions. You can allocate the fear of inclusion in society within those terms with a sprinkle of conspiracy theories added to the Marxist and Postmodernism philosophy. It’s a misunderstanding that the good can only be found in the left spectrum [or genuine good is only for the right because the left is now labelled as ‘dreaded’] – when tribal civilisations lived without the concept of Abrahamic faiths and economic credit structures for millennia. No one would dare reduce Christianity the same way, given that the Catholics once had an inquisition – or the Christians that came to the United States (as well as Australia) and persisted in wiping out the ethnic population they found there. There needs to be accountability for what economic history has done in the name of Christianity. However, to define Christianity through this singular example would be unheard of. So, the same can be said with Marxism.  

Socialism is the critique of capitalism, a product of Marxist theory, and even those who aren’t Marxist were critical of capitalism. Marxism is the most developed tradition in that field. You can identify China as the best-developed form of Marxism. It would be challenging to identify China as a communist country, given the country’s objective has little to do with class. China can be described as a Communist country with a veneer of market economics, or is it a capitalist country with a nominally Communist government? Perhaps it is both: ‘state capitalism’ with a framework of Communist party rule.  

The most significant legislative critique of capitalism from the United States comes from the South (Oklahoma). During the great depression, there was a movement from the country’s working class. The CIO was the biggest unionization the country had ever seen. Two socialist and communist parties grew during the depression. It was the communists, socialists and unions that represented millions of workers. They initiated a meeting with the president then and proposed to the president to help the millions of workers during the depression. The president at the time didn’t want a backlash or revolution rising. He had a scenario where he could take advantage of an opportunity to hold his position of power, and he accepted the meeting. The government and businesses at the time proposed a strategy where they convinced other companies to give him finances to favour the American people on the condition the group stopped any notions of revolutions.

They divided the business community, but those who were pro-equality and the president established the social security system in the Depression era. Those from the age of 65 onwards would get a check for the rest of their lives. There was unemployment compensation, passing the first minimum wage, creating a federal employment program (those that built many of the national parks) and conservation work. WPA announced to all unemployed artists to create a group instilling cultural development throughout the United States. To do all of this, you had to have money, and for Roosevelt to make do with his claim, he taxed corporations and the rich, an action that had never been seen before. This action would gain favour from the people; he was then elected three times after that. And this all happened through a movement below from the left.  

There is a distinction between capitalism and criminal capitalism; with all its faults, capitalism is held up as a utility that people accept. The confusion comes about through the delusion that somehow it brought forth democracy, which is unfounded. Meanwhile, (Criminal)-Capitalism produces and reproduces inequality, as French economist Thomas Piketty’s evaluation exemplifies. Capitalism promised many notions of liberty, equality, and brotherhood but never followed through. Every place capitalism settled from England in the 18th century, all across the world’s dominant system, always followed an economic downturn with it. Every 4 to 7 years, this financial system lasted from 1929-41 until 2008, and 11 downturns became evident. J.P Morgan Chase Bank issued a regular report, predicting the next downturn would be early in 2020. 

Act Four: Wet Nurse the Flu [Dai the Flu]; Die the Flu: How convenient is it then that a (C-19)-Virus has emerged upon the prediction of this downturn, and perhaps it’s about fearing social change that gestates from the good, and not necessarily through conventions  [like in Roosevelt’s time, but a more extensive scale]. It plays on the notion of Christian theology regarding the last, which shall be the first concept. And in this realisation, an attendant co-creator, QAnon or ‘Q ‘for short, happens to come online. Then, they write the script at a particular time and feed the millenarian groups’ delusions. That inherently needs to impart an apocalypticism view.

So, I mentioned before how fundamentalists use something unquantifiable and the fear of uncertainty to move specific political schemes. And recognise that these are just abstractions that are only held in mind. Any notions stemming from those abstractions have a habit of deceiving like a Virus. This has relevance because, in our modern times, a literal Virus with (Bird) )-like Flu characteristics has emerged in our modern-day landscape. With all the hallmarks of unquantifiability and uncertainties that can strike at any time, this is the problem. The reaction is to observe the creation of uncertainty as manipulation. The more you feed into the uncertainty with imagination, the more it grows, acting like a virus. A solution is a low-level form of totalitarianism through a rational process of isolationism disguised as good intentions, while a technocratic plot is being played behind the scenes. That uses uncertainty for a reason as one of its motivations. The how and the why I leave that to alarmist researchers. These are very sophisticated types of False Flags that use morphing opposites. 

We’ve discussed the rule of morphing opposites or inversions, as conspiracy theorists define it. We’ve also discussed how the US’s political climate now imbues conspiracy theory as something normal to the mainstream. The so-called millenarianism and ‘Q’ can be controlled opposition because the political marketing campaigners know how to cater to an audience inclined to outlandish notions. I’m not saying their conspiracy theory is wrong; I’m trying to infer that the paranoid types can follow any spokesperson who uses the fear of uncertainty so mindlessly. Perhaps it’s all a distraction for them as a looming capitalistic-technocratic-plot is about to be bestowed upon them, possibly by the same government leaders they support as heroes.  

‘Q’ is the 17th letter of the alphabet and a signifier for Horus. Finally, the Character ‘Question’ in DC comics is inspired by ‘Mr. A’ a character inspired by Ayn Rand’s philosophy of objectivism. In some ways, this philosophy is similar to Descartes’s notions of self-contained objects. Objectivism is popular among libertarians and Conservatives. These philosophies are outside political spectrums, meaning both sides can adopt them. And the conservatives use their argument to prop up individualism, which always has a sprinkle of nationalism. Rand once said: “There are two sides to every issue: one side is right and the other is wrong, but the middle is always evil.” 

Similarly, Mr A used a calling card that was half-black and half-white, saying there was good and evil and nothing in between. The nature and rule of morphing opposites contradict these notions; nothing is ever black and white, and the middle is always evil because it’s the oligarchy. Wannabe creator-stewards will always be a poor rendition of the original evil deceiver because it is stuck in an uninvolved human state. We also have the character ‘Rorschach’, an offshoot of ‘Question’ who is now a symbol for the far-right conservative group in the sequel to Watchmen.

So we have ‘Q’ and ‘Mr. A’ a culmination of ‘Q’ and ‘A’ – Mr Peterson goes on Australia’s ABC show QandA. Similarly, by its very name ‘Q’ and ‘N’ (QAnon) ‘, N‘ for Non as in Nun meaning all things ‘Fish’ (also means None or Space) signifies you can ask questions, but there are no (real) answers. He also lectures in a Trump Hotel. He also fights the Senate on aspects of the C-16 bill, all while a C-19 Virus is about to loom. While the Conservative chief and master’s prodigal son dresses like Thanos on Halloween, Thanos’s ship in the Avengers film is shaped like ‘Q’ – and the fictional character Thanos’s main goal is to depopulate the world. The Trump Hotel in Las Vegas is shaped like the ‘Y’ symbol, which also signifies ‘destination’ and ‘Trinity’ symbol that has a strange association with the Mandalay Bay shooting. During that time, there were purposeful coded typos in news articles that describe the hoax event: “more than50 people were killed,” the typo ‘than50’ as in Thanos – the Thanos/Than50 are hinting who they are – the Thanos’s people. The gunman, Stephen Paddock, is a 64-year-old man. 64+32 [thirty-second floors] equals 96, the 6-9 false death codes.

The ‘Q’ group, which seems to act like Christian conspiracy theorists and conservative political campaigners, was once known as the Millenarianism group. Now, it is known as ‘Q’ [the meme think virus]. It is the anti-group version of the fictional Millennium group in the TV show Millennium.

As the 3rd millennium approached, the Group’s internal differences began to manifest into two factions—the “Roosters”, who believed in a religiously eschatological view of the end of the world, and the “Owls”, who believed the world would end with a secular natural disaster. Attempting to instigate the end of the world artificially, the Rooster faction began to develop a lethal virus; in 1998 they released this virus in the Pacific Northwest, killing upwards of seventy people before the outbreak was contained. A year later, a vastly depleted Millennium Group staged one last attempt to trigger the apocalypse, resurrecting deceased members in order to create the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse; when this plot was foiled by the FBI, it was believed to have caused the dissolution of the Group. – Wikipedia

.

The warring faction was said to be inspired by the creative’s study on the faction between the Knights Templar and Freemasonry. The overall group’s symbol was depicted as the Ouroboros. Millenarianism refers to a more cataclysmic and destructive arrival of a utopian period than millennialism. It often denotes a more peaceful arrival and is more closely associated with a one-thousand-year utopia. There are morphing opposites here to the extent the core belief is swapped.    

Rooster Faction, as in Bird faction, releases a deadly virus – birds in Egyptian mythologies are identified as carriers for the soul. Then, we have the Etheric alignment symbol or map drawn in blood and cloned twins.

.

The Twin aspect is significant here as it ties in with the number 17, and the 17th number of the alphabet is ‘Q.’ The number 17 is important because of its association with 153 (the fish). We discussed the concepts of resurrection and incarnation in the last post. So, we have ‘Question’ questioning the Man in the Sky about an ending world conspiracy centring on the Man in the Sky, a.k.a. the ‘Son of Nun’ (in this retrospective, it’s Superman, a solar Christ figure). I53 is the numerical value of the sacred geometric symbol of the Vesica Piscis.

This symbolically coincides with Eldarin beings, Star Trek, and the bloodlines of the gods, which were also mentioned in my last post. The Twin symbol signified in Star-Trek- Picard is the Vesica Piscis symbol. We have the bird-of-prey space-ship (birds are symbolic carriers of souls) flying away from it [the bird, in my symbolic assumption, pierces through the pearl contained between the two concentric circles]. Symbolically, the show is loosely based on the creation of the Man and the Soul twin or the concepts of the two divine sisters. We have Man (Dr Soong) Creating A.I. (Data), the God created Man; Man creating A.I. creation motif, repeated many times in films like Blade Runner, Battlestar Galactica, Ghost in the Shell, etc. Data’s positronic brain houses metaphorical DNAs, and Dr Maddox solves the soul transference problem, now in complete form, through the data’s techno-progeny symbolised in the twin. One of the Twins dies, and Picard becomes her shattered vessel; he must now find the other twin in which he and the vessel become complete.        

The link between unique bloodlines that are out of sync with the rest of the human populace is depicted in Star Trek’s utopian token figure – the Elve-like and humanistic being ‘Spock.’ Spock represents the left-right brain in balance; the Vulcans are a logic-based society with intuitive psychic abilities, which is incongruent with their archetype. The Vulcans have cultivated the logic aspect of their brain to the point that it had nowhere to go other than intuition, which is its polar opposite in the brain functions. Rationality rules only to the fact that it cannot go any farther without help from those highly intuitive aspects – those who have reached cosmic consciousness. Steven Hawkins was so left-brain that it came full circle that his right brain took over, a speculative notion. Still, his calculations couldn’t go any further without applying a postmodern deterministic model. And if it’s deterministic, it means there is a creator, which means there is a God [but only as much as logic permits it; ‘rationalists, go figure.’]

Spock, but more precisely, the pure Vulcan people, a.k.a. Elder Beings, represent this imbalance in mind and blood. However, X-files in the revival season eight, “My Struggle 2”, and season one “, The Erlenmeyer Flask”, outline the spooky link between a fictional alien blood virus and the meta-narrative/artefact of testing bird-flu virus. The story goes: 

Alien DNA has been injected into every American citizen to facilitate the widespread outbreak of the Spartan Virus. Designed to strip humans of their immune systems, this contagion quickly manifests itself nationwide. Scully and Einstein noted a sharp increase in patients admitted to hospitals and triage centres.   Scully and Einstein attempt to develop a vaccine using Scully’s DNA. Scully realizes that she is being protected from the contagion by a combination of the alien genomes that remained after she was abducted and experimented on and the DNA anomalies instilled within her at the request of Reyes. It is the absence of alien DNA that makes everybody else susceptible. – Wikipedia

.

DNAs counter type RNA (or DNAs opposite) plays a significant role in the whole meta-narrative of uncertainty. DNA within the nucleus is passive, but when the cell decides to do something, it will arrange the DNA to produce RNA. The RNA will produce proteins (messages), which every living creature has. Even viruses, bacteria, and fungi have RNA. RNA is malleable, meaning it produces and consumes again, which means the body doesn’t have the same RNA at any given time. The evolving drama about a pandemic is strictly based on some scientists in China who found some different RNAs. Finding RNA doesn’t prove it comes from a Virus – there has to be a set of purification tests done to eliminate similarities; tests never went through this process. And this makes it a speculative notion and, therefore, an epidemic of testing. The significant amount of false positives regarding testing is being ignored. Medical journals are enhancing an epidemic panic by interpreting the data only in ways that benefit the theory, even when the data are contradictory – which makes it a propaganda endeavour.

Bacteria are looking a bit Alien; at least X-files fictional [sort of] telling knows the process of purity testing.

.

X-files big bad the Syndicate is always attempting to create a human-alien master race and plot a spread of the extra-terrestrial virus via gene therapy by secret clandestine genetic determinists. While these conspirators use alien implants to track their human guinea pigs, along with homicidal tendencies that can be triggered by cell phones and other technologies, the episode “Blood” gave a shock to the cyber-hype of the nineties. But, of course, that was two decades ago; concurrently, the paranoia is still there; add in a 5G component, and you’re up-to-date.

You only have to follow archetypal imagery associated with this particular endeavour. Like all other hoax-like endeavours that came before it, you can find the synch trail. This specific event is a magnet for other conspiracies that have no bearing on the hoax but latch onto it. Due to a significant populace sophisticated enough to know, those conspiracy notions may exist. Nonetheless, ‘those higher up know that we know, and they don’t care’ – a baseline conspiracy needs to be recognised, which is the testing component’s artefact. The conspiracy aspect of causes like weak immune systems still needs to be acknowledged.      

There were many prototype flu viruses, but the most famous was the Zika virus. And this came from blood experiments on monkeys produced by a biotech company financed by the Gates Foundation. They used engineered GMO mosquitos (OX513A) with a kill switch gene to implement the spread. The disinformation that was funnelled to the public was combating malaria. The problem-reaction-solution implementation of a vaccine has repeated concurrently with the Coronavirus that seemingly coincides with the economic downturn – with the help of media, pushed a grander narrative.

In the epic Sci-fi saga-like series “Star Trek Deep Space Nine,” a godlike race of shapeshifters called “The Founders” created a genetically modified warrior race called the Jem Hadar. Who required a drug called “Ketracel-white” to survive – Jem Hader’s only way of getting it was through the Founders; hence, they relied on their makers. In effect, this is what Oxitec Company has done with OX513A. They designed the pest in such a way with its kill switch gene that it requires the widespread popular antibiotic to survive. While the coronavirus has no signs or qualities of a bio-weapon, the debate surrounding its origination can’t be agreed upon. There is no doubt a similar implementation regarding a narcissistic dependency, whatever that maybe [vaccines] has all the hallmarks of dreariness on its way.               

The corona-virus’s name has a strange association with the goddess imagery. Heraclitus says: “Man is a portion of cosmic fire, imprisoned in a body of earth and water.” Hints at the fiery spark within every man, but is contained in a body on Earth. Man’s body is Man’s Earth, and the destruction of man’s Earth is the destruction of man’s body. In that regard, there were uncontrollable fires on Australia’s east coast that lasted for months; a year before that, there were fires also burning in California – all seemingly repeated events guise as natural disasters. Fire embodies destruction and new growth, but man’s cosmic fire is the spark. What are on fire are the bodies on Earth; the destruction of man’s body on Earth is analogous to the destruction of the stage. Moses once asserted that “God is a burning and consuming fire.” This aligns with the two divine sisters and the coming end of the world’s revelation engulfed in fire.

Wet Nurse the Flu imagery—the morphing of Saint Corona and Isis—can also lead back to the Crown and the Lion.

.

So we have the potent Wet Nurse imagery associated with Isis on the backdrop of fire. Penny Dreadful is set in Los Angeles, and California was on fire a year or two ago. Some places hit were wine country, the wine, and the stone burning (the wine-stone, the blood from the stone is burning). Wet Nurse also means Dai – and Dai is Filipino slang for ‘dude.’ The dude is a character in The Big Lebowski – essentially the awakened Christ-consciousness figure; he is also the fool. The dude gets a call from the Masons. They need the dude’s help because, unlike the dude, they are without Christ-consciousness. It is a subtle nod to the physics explanation of the observer effect. Still, esoterically, it suggests that we are the narrators of (our) reality; reality is the stage upon which we play the fool. Distinctly, the fool with Christ consciousness within himself is like having the spark, which is all about reassembling the shattered psychic. The spark needs to get out, and it’s through death (the shattered vessel), but the psyche needs to be constituted first; that’s the Kintsugi-Alchemy aspect, which has a spiritual element.  

Act Four: The Sun shines a light on every individual while it moves on a Mobius strip. The sun’s nature is local and travels on the creator’s circuit—the sun also acts as a beacon for the individual’s rendering. The Sun and Moon are personally rendered to the individual—the observer of the holographic simulation, which we all share collectively. There is a morphing of postmodern and individualistic ideals here, which Flat Earth (philosophy) has made apparent.   

There is a logical base to Flat Earth’s notions. However, strong contentions still have unanswered questions that flat-earth logic needs help to answer. So it’s up in the air to theorize possible conclusions, not through logic but intuition. For example, the common consensus for the rotation of the Sun and Moon on a flat earth map is impossible due to the declination of sunrise and sunset, especially in the southern hemisphere. In a specific place in Alaska, it can be observed that the Sun never sets, and due to perspective, there is a sunset and sunrise.

Along with the anomaly that the rotations of the star around the Polaris star, which are transfixed, move counter-clockwise as opposed to the southern hemisphere, where it rotates around a supposed South Pole star called Sigma Octantis moves clockwise. While we can’t determine a definitive answer for the anomalies of star rotations, there is substantial contention to suggest it’s due to magnetic declinations. So, when you look from south to north, stars spin clockwise, and when you look from north to south, the stars move counter-clockwise. The celestial axis makes a cross or an “X”, and the “X” marks the spot. You can also be assured that water always finds its level.

Within this anomaly, it doesn’t mean going back to a false belief system. It means figuring out the answer; perhaps more than a rational explanation is required. Focusing on metaphysics and perception, with the understanding that we are co-creators, can help derive a plausible answer. Concerning the sunset and sunrise declination, there is a theoretical plausibility that the creator’s circuit is shaped like a Mobius strip [also known as an inverted infinity symbol], and the Sun and Moon follow that circuit. 

The natural rotation of the Sun and Moon imparts a philosophy for individualism and, simultaneously, is shared collectively with everyone else. The Sun and the Moon travel on the creator circuit – at the same time, the Sun and Moon are personally rendered for every individual as the observer. So, this notion is both a Morrison and Peterson point of view regarding individualism – although my view on individualism is not far-right, as opposed to Peterson, who promotes this position in his writings.

Peterson has never overtly described himself as an Evangelical Christian, but it’s implicit in his writings or mirrors the same views. Peterson proclaims that Christian doctrines elevated the individual soul, placing enslaved persons and enslavers on the same metaphysical footing, rendering them equal before God and the law. This particular importance was then valued in ‘works’ [minus the indulgence aspect], and within these works, it prevented kings from lording it over the commoner morally. In addition, Christians insist that one cannot attain salvation through work alone. Evangelicalism imposes an eschatological solid faith and belief system.

Regarding salvation, I would like you to impart a decisive spiritual deed not to burn forever. The distinction regarding ‘works’ and Peterson’s inclusion of that word is distinctly what someone does and what they are. This is made clear by the striking difference between Catholicism and other Christian religions. The opposite of works under Evangelicalism is your divine nature (grace-level). You level this up by accepting Jesus as your saviour and getting others to do the same: evangelising.

To summarize, the fundamental view that Peterson claims directly reflects Evangelical ideals – Evangelicals believe that all souls are equal, but some souls have more value than others. Unfortunately, Peterson explains this in an overly definitive way. The Christian version (or his) of equality is at the heart of the West, and it wasn’t in play before Christianity, but it’s also not in play now, even though it’s not central to the West.

If you don’t believe his tendency to lean to a far-right position, maybe a quote from his twelve rules for life can sway you: “Consider the murderousness of your own spirit before you dare accuse others and before you attempt to repair the fabric of the world. Maybe it’s not the world that’s at fault. Maybe it’s you… you’ve fallen short of the glory of God. You’ve sinned.” Peterson’s negative internal focus comes to light: be good because you’re awful, but he misses the Oligarchy and Hydra aspect within the hierarchies that he discusses – as well the conspiracy side that follows it, which is a quality that is not the fault of oneself.   

While Morrison’s lecture imposed considerable philosophical contentions in such a short lecture, denying individualism, proclaiming people with NPD (narcissistic personality disorder) are mutants and is, therefore, an evolutionary step-up because they have no context [which I disagree with], and magic. Morrison’s take on a reverse version of the Big Bang Theory [everything is flowing back to its source] so it can match the ‘oneness’ philosophy, which is only mitigated due to a false theory, to begin with. It’s a new take on Nihilism with a sprinkle of New Age notions. It’s okay if the world destroys itself because we are Lava; the higher beings watch over us. After all, they have no concept of time – they watch over their experiment, humans in time, and they’re waiting for humans to grow spiritually. As they change from Lava to a butterfly – the new age’s New Earth concept is akin to Christian end-time eschatology, where the next life has more importance than the one you have now; it’s the same thing.  

Peterson imposes his analysis on the eschatological aspect of Religion while proclaiming it comes from Nietzsche; he proposes that great philosophers mounted an assault on Christian thinking – which had to accept the proposition that Christ’s sacrifice redeemed humanity. And for that, redemption had already been borne by the Savior. And nothing of importance remained for the all-too-fallen human individuals. Nietzsche only claimed that the Christian faith as practised was not a proper representation of Jesus’ teachings – the distinction between acting Christian and Christ-like, not his statement mentioned above. He imparts that Paul and the Lutherans removed responsibility from Christ’s followers. This aspect of removal is an Evangelical argument. He further elaborates this notion through Jung while quoting Nietzsche [on pg.189, 12 Rules for Life]

The three critical dogmas according to Peterson that have dire consequences are:

Christs crucifixion redeemed the world	The idea that this life does not matter, it is in the next life that mattered – this had the added consequence of reducing the responsibility for problems that humans face and the drive to fix it
Salvation is reserved for the hereafter	Accept how things are because nothing you do can change your salvation level status
Salvation cannot be achieved through works	Jesus already did the heavy lifting so you can morally slack off.

.

These Dogmas somehow match Morrison’s New Age nihilism aspect, putting them on the same boat; it’s just a flip of the coin. Peterson takes comfort in believing that these Dogmas died [or God is dead], and what emerged was nihilism. Along with it, science brought a new totalising utopian idea: communism and Fascism [I’ve already analysed the wrong notions of these ideas, so I will skip that]. There is nothing to suggest that science can’t be dogmatic; science’s tangent mode, scientism, draws many ideas from the same source as religion.   

Peterson’s notion of Marxism and Postmodernism needs updated contemporary views and hints of historical facts. Instead of imposing a revisionist aspect of history with his followers, he states, “Christianity separated church from the state so that all-too-human emperors could no longer claim the veneration due to gods.” Historically, there are many accounts that Kings and Queens, notably in the West, claimed the divine right to rule. But, then, this divine right was used as an excuse to impose a feudal system; slavery was filtered down to the religious notion of good works that impart a reward system in the kingdom of heaven.       

Once you get past his analysis of Nietzsche, Jung, and Dostoevsky in association with Christianity, you will realise emphases on hierarchies and evolutionary determinism that can fit into a Logos philosophy. He is an absolutist in discrete; if it’s not ‘A’, it’s ‘B’ – if it’s not Heaven, it’s Hell with no room for ambiguity though he claims to stand in the border of chaos and order; maybe he is just full of contradictions. Or that he uses morphing opposites of ideas that confuse people. For instance, he cites: “It’s not as if Nietzsche was unwilling to give the faith – and, more particularly, Catholicism – its due.” Peterson points out Catholicism, but not Christianity as a whole, even though Nietzsche’s father was a Lutheran, not a Catholic, and who else likes to point fingers at Catholicism: fundamentalist Evangelical Christians. [I’m not saying Catholicism is without fault; I’m merely pointing out a parallel].    

Peterson hates postmodernism because of his absolutist way of thinking, yet he proclaims he stands on the borders of chaos and order. This contradiction is perhaps a meta-morphing of opposites to perpetuate itself in its censored form. He uses intuition as a reason, not intuition itself, reason guise as intuition. Though it is still part of the right hemisphere of thinking deductive logic and the ability to reason, it depends on the right hemisphere; however, it’s still not intuition; it’s reason propagating as logic. However, it’s still a step ahead of rationalist thinkers.  

Flat earth philosophy [a relatively new term I’m propagating] deconstructs the basis of current belief systems – it’s new and ambitious and could have implications if not understood correctly. Ultimately, it’s a bland philosophical abstraction because it hasn’t reached its peak point concerning a collective understanding [to them, it’s an intriguing thought experiment – for flat earthers, it’s a foundation for truth]. Flat earth philosophy only questions its foundation. Flat earth philosophy does not sit morally or ethically in the centre of relativism. It can sometimes be used as a gateway for relativism, not in mainstream arguments, but in conspiratorial ones. Some flat earth notions (New Age Flat Earthers) once advocated the Jews are the big bad, Hitler was a hero, and Nukes are hoaxes – there is no sense of responsibility regarding the implications of these notions. The most common thread in any psychological operations or controlled oppositions is what they’re for and what they’re not revealing. What was not revealed by New Age flat earthers is the Catholic Churches’ involvement in that totalitarian drama, and because of this, what they’re for is revealed. One must view it from a white-centred historical perspective to grasp it. Colin Wilson’s Outsider concept comes close to this understanding.  

To perpetuate itself in its censored form is a Trojan Horse aspect, a wolf in sheep’s clothing scenario – when deep down, it boils down to fear. In this case, it is the fear of inclusion from cultures that differ from their standard forms of normalcy. Whenever people in a dominant position get nervous about the security of their dominance, they like to anchor it in nature. Advocating notions like [Peterson’s]: dominance and naturally driven hierarchies, Logos, & Crabs are part of evolutionary processes – these notions now being natural superiorities. In equal measure, Morison says: there is nothing in reality that is not nature; nature made men, who invented things that we think are separate, but ultimately, this separation is an illusion, and it’s all part of nature. The obvious meta-morphing of opposites has found its constant ‘nature,’ though it seems to be an argumentative out for both because the contention lies in the imbalance. Morrison lacks logic; Peterson lacks intuition. Moreover, both can tell you certain truths because they’re at the forefront of managing perception. Flat Earth’s philosophy deconstructs the stage and the wrong aspect of evolution and holds as a reminder that they’re just social conventions, and you can change them.  

Postmodernism questions meanings and grand narratives, filtered through scientism and comparative-Christian-religion through the archetype of the Logos. Scientism issues a “meaningless” universe devoid of specific structures and, by extension, God. Christian-Religious-Dogmatism, being its opposite, lacks archetypal ancestry and holds Biblical literalism as an absolute. This is why Postmodernism is such a threat to any form of absolutist structure and philosophy. The supposed danger comes in denying grand narratives that supposedly hold society together for the proposition of a new one. It’s less about denial, an upgrade, a re-loaded simulation or a New Testament. Fictional storytellers outside absolutist conventions have been repackaging these old myths for decades. [I once described it as timeless archetypal key-frames in the human play]. There is no danger; civilization will not collapse because of archetypal indifference.

The proposed denial of the grand narrative’s proposition somehow makes Christion’s past endeavours non-existent in that their endeavour didn’t come with upheavals from those they conquered. Christian endeavours are free from historical atrocities – the same endeavour that imposes its grand narrative through evolution and cultural beliefs. Then you’re left with conventions trapped in a Hegelian web with no signs of progress as our imaginations are kindly controlled. The dogmatic side of science still evaluates the spirit through materialism; psychology denotes the term psyche as a phenomenon of the brain and the nervous system. Still, this opinion is a better evaluation of the psyche than science’s denial of everything outside the physical. The denial of everything outside the physical is where the denial of the grand narrative’s proposition is applicable, not through types of philosophy that generate ideas (postmodernism).     

Spiritual science is an old term used to express its modern meaning, found in the new term liberal arts (literature, music, etc.). The other is known as physical sciences.’ Jung revives the term spirit for a better understanding of culture. He states: “Spirit is the principle that stands in opposition to matter; by this, we understand immaterial substance or form of existence, which on the highest and most universal level is called God. We also imagine this immaterial substance as the vehicle of a psychic phenomenon or even of life itself. In contradiction to this view, there stands the antithesis; here, the concept of Spirit is restricted to the supernatural and anti-natural – and has lost its substantial connection with psyche and life.” So, what he’s implying is that both in Religion and Science teachings. The meaning of spirituality has been lost. Religion has lost the principle of the embodiment of incarnation, not of Jesus, but of the Spirit.

Jung was aware that archaic people were mindful of the autonomous and sovereign quality of the spirit entity. However, the archaic man experiences it as an immaterial breath-like present, which exists in his environment as if it were outside him. He states: “With growing development, however, it enters the sphere of human consciousness and becomes a function on the consciousness whereby its autonomous character is lost.” So this is similar to Crowley’s notion of magic through music: “The sequence of that impression, which constitutes our intellectual apprehension of the universe, is replaced by that form of consciousness.”  This all contributes to how we deal with reality, especially regarding the spirit we first project. Then, this intelligent force or entity outside of us has a measure of objectivity, and the individual has to be re-absorbed. Then, gradually, we begin to recognise the reality we previously assumed is out there, not out there, but somehow mysteriously in here.  

This general principle is vital to understand because it differentiates New Age’s co-creating new world concept, a distinction of postmodernism. However, it had its roots in spiritual materialism and religion. Spiritual-materialism was taken from the Archaic or shamanistic belief that the spirit has an all-pervading substance. That underlines various phenomena, which then turned into a materialistic doctrine. At the same time, Jung regarded it as the identity of spirit and psyche functions instead of mere brain functions (spiritual-materialism). Religion identifies God through the term “Supreme Good”, with the original identity of a substance expressed through fallen angels and the near relationship with Yahuwah and Satan. These come from old Jewish mythologies where the predisposition was to make the law of God have the premise of good and bad tendencies – as a way to explain theodicy. Then it split off to Satan being the evil one, but the focus here is that daemonic and the divine are both parts of that realm and what we refer to as spirit.        

Religion then lost its meaning of spirit; religion should then be reminded about the source and original character of the spirit – so that the individual never forgets what they draw into their field and with what they feel is their consciousness. After all, it’s not the individual who created it for himself; on the contrary, it’s what makes them create it. Our creativity is the result of this quality around us and inside of us; this is what we call the spirit; it penetrates the human essence – then man is tempted to believe to a certain point that man is the creator of spirit and possesses it. And this is the enantiodromia process. 

The enantiodromia process must be achieved before any notions of New World ideals; this is challenging given how the ego structure works. And this is based on Jung’s conception of the ethical dilemma of false creation. When it expresses, it cannot give creation inspiration (or ecstasy) without taking it away from somewhere else because our reality interweaves with other realities. To move past false creation, one must step outside the world creatively and enter another – because nothing is being taken if it’s drawn from the right source. What we call emptiness, or the higher world (the spirit), exists in abundance instead of reality, where we work with available resources. 

Suppose the mind is out of tune with the good transcendental consciousness. In that case, creativity is not readily available. Instead, approach it with emptiness, resulting in a shower of ideas. This Zen approach has value in determining the correct ethical value concerning the penetration or creation of new realities – must meet the alteration of the mind. Philo’s four kinds of altered states often described these alterations, which aligned with Greek pantheon gods. I then broke this down through four points of psychological analysis (or four points of Ecstasy: 1-Pathological, 2-Extreme Amazement, 3-Passivity of mind, 4-Divine Possession) through the study Mark P. The ‘Pathological’ entails a fallacy on the philosophy of individualism, which generally involves an unstable psyche overrun by a state of ecstasy, a mad delusion. It can be parallel to the political realm, where dictators become apparent. Tolkien described it as “the greed for self-centred power, which is the mark of a mere lower magician.”   

Jung’s Psychology of Spirit’s notion of enantiodromia is similar to the meta-morphing of opposites – although the enantiodromia can be more profound. The concept of psycho-spiritual transformation stands apart from the enlightenment process involving contact with light. The New Age has distorted the idea of light, leaving out the mind. The enantiodromia process manifests as a spirit in dreams through archetypes – it’s not certain that the spirit figures are morally good. Often, it appears morally ambivalent or downright malicious. Jung’s statement expresses these uncertainties: “Who knows about the great plan and how much evil is necessary to bring about the good by enantiodromia, and which good will turn into evil – wait and see.” So, the enantiodromia process is about the whole instead of certain details concerning arguments between dualities. He remarks that there are no readymade solutions but a confrontation between uncertainty and moral evaluation with the confusing interplay between good and bad. Emotions like guilt, suffering, and redemption must be acknowledged and resolved. Jungian scholars know for alchemy to take place, there needs to be an interaction with the opposite.  

Jung implies the reward that comes after jumping out of rational consciousness. Man’s propensity to spin its wheel is at one level of consciousness where logic, rationality, causality, and morality hold all the rules incompatible. So, there’s a need to rise out of that. Then, you will come into specific insights and recognitions that don’t belong in those modes but are as much part of that world when you recognise an infusing between ordinary views with a perspective that has a greater value.

This is where Flat-earth philosophy can open those greater perspectives. Flat Earth deconstructs while synchro-mysticism decodes together. It can be an intriguing method of thought. It asks the individual to step away from Pavlov’s conditioning and question their overall identity. And this challenges how you perceive the universe to ignite your power of will. To go beyond an active or passive mind or integrate both. In a time where Events and Hoaxes are so common, it’s almost normalized. All while warnings by conspiracy theorists no longer sway the public on possible upcoming events propagated by (Archonic) agents of descent. Perhaps this is a time for the synchro-mystics to rise and educate through asymmetrical foundations, making it more memorable – because we’re heading into a time where it’s up to the individual and the collective to manifest their type of reality. All awhile being impervious to tricks in the guise of some Pavlovian pattern response – this is bigger than mere political correctness (woke culture), a system of cultural descent predominantly driven by offspring of upper-middle-class families. The marginalized are all too silent in such debates; they are merely subjects for strawman tactics.     

At the same time, two significant cultural developments are emerging: the coronavirus pandemic and the rise of identity politics in entertainment. A common thread between them is a pervasive fear of uncertainty fueled by dialectical thinking. This way of thinking should be separate from politics or entertainment, as doing so can diminish the magic of these realms. Instead, love and acceptance can help alleviate the fear of uncertainty. With that remediation, you can create a new narrative as co-creators. It’s not about transforming one environment into another but shifting our mental perception.

Love and acceptance detached from the New Age’s notion of love promote something artificial. People often don’t like to infer New Age ideas, yet they still refer to it in their arguments with a slight disconnection. This is exemplified in the quote, “not to sound like a New Age … […]” – because, in many ways, New Age notions are a filtered-down mechanism of esotericism. Its backlash is usually through its distorted teachings, the complacency of mind, and the over-simplification of monism; all you need is a loving approach. The challenge lies in the interrogation, which corresponds to dissolving the ego and transcending duality, which is part of the gradual recovery of the elements of the perfect light. Love is held as the ultimate reality, which is universal, with cosmic consciousness being the highest love that you can attain. 

This notion of love is also a fundamental aspect of the Christian ethic. The rationalist atheist, being its polar opposite, is there to remind them not to fall into religious dogmatism. Because of this, the Christian’s ethic of love is regulated to its material form; its limitation transforms into something diluted into some abstract rationality. Rationalism can fall into utilitarian mysticism as it denies intuition. This was the same focus during the Enlightenment era as moral idealism was its kryptonite; they proposed that Enlightenment teachers, with their higher ideals, were fundamentally irrational. Spiritual-materialism is blinded by spiritual blindness when science (materialism) is conceived as pure knowledge of physical forces.

One must break through that to have gnosis. And some overvalue things of the mind – worshipping ideas, opinions, and concepts, denying gnosis. The grandiosity of intellect cannot admit that their ideas might be wrong. Still, it has room for flexibility, meaning a drastic change (or egoic alchemical change) in their perspective means they’ve moved beyond the mind. The Buddhists say that every human being is deluded until they have attained enlightenment. So, any objection raised in the process of enlightenment comes out of your deluded mind, which makes it invalid. The new age concept of creating our reality is thwarted by the assumption that you may not like it once it’s created. Moreover, the act of creating it for others will lead you back to a place that’s similar to where you started.     

In Baudrillard’s book, he comments on a fable where cryptographers create a map that is so perfect and co-extensive with geography that it touches real geography at every point. For Baudrillard, the map is what’s important; the map has meaning for us; the map is a simulacrum and, as a model, loses all reference to reality. In Baudrillard’s fable, our reality exists only as rotting shreds attached to the map; this is the state of our age, according to Baudrillard. So that the model itself is likened to the human game, the real has become irrelevant and undefinable and clings only as vestiges. He coins the term the desert of the real to describe our age.        

If the map is likened to our reality but rotting away, those who can’t see its progressive destruction have any reference to it. The question is why it is rotting away and who is causing its demise. And it’s easy to postulate an answer and link it to the Demiurge. Together with his archons and human worshippers, they are working hard to deny man knowledge. The map is a simulacrum because our reality is envisioned through slices of time images. Considering Flat Earth, our map is simulated, and reality is holographic. We are in a consciousness-building machine where we create our realities independent of the control systems that have been put over us.

.

.