Normal Behaviour in an Apocalyptic World:

.

.

---

.

Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – Learning Algorithms based on our World of Language & Magic: As we continue from the previous post, discussing Atheism and its teachers, spokespersons, and authors on its subject and its appeal to groups. Regarding the acceptance of the awakening state without acknowledging a creator-God – as they positioned themselves in that role; they’re unable to retract anything that may contradict the words written in their books. In the contention that theology is the only way to bridge the gap – at which Atheists undergoing an awakening state strides towards (Zen)/Budhasim or the New Age – as opposed to theology and religion.

There is a fallacy in that idea. On the religious side, traditional Christians value theology deeply due to a transfixed idea of God, and the use of transfix is on purpose as opposed to faith. An authentic idea that imparts believing in God also means a lack of faith because faith means a total let go (an idea by Alan Watts). Stephan A. Hoeler also described theology as an “intellectual wrapping around the spiritual kernel of a religion – if this is true, then it is also true that most religions are being strangled and stifled by their wrappings.” Gnosticism does not run this danger because its worldview is stated in myth rather than in theology. 

However, you may find even in mythology that opposing views are also in battle to dominate a concept of one ideal; such instances are found in cosmology as Hellenistic ideas started to merge into Jewish concepts. Ancient Israelite’s concept of cosmology was a flat disc with pillars holding it up and a dome in the sky. And, of course, the Merkaba mysteries introduced a cosmology intuned with Talmiec’s writings, a world similar to an Aristotelian world of crystal spheres with various heavens aligned, reaching up to the world of heavens. Of course, this thesis collection outlines the whole flat-earth thing. We merely merged both concepts and enclosed those spheres/celestials/planets below the sky, with those spheres being cosmological gateways for that dimension – with the God of this world being at the highest of heavens below the sky but still higher than the five Archons of the abyss (Earth).  

Traditional, Orthodox, fundamentalist Christians do not allow or entertain a God beyond God idea and give no credence to a Gnostic approach. Gnosticism’s focused ideal on a world-rejecting side resembles nihilism, or maybe it is closer to Stocisim. They never fully reject God but are seen merely as an adversary or by-product of true-God, and things are just the way it is – being the whole macrocosm and its meta-physics is beyond one’s control, but merely interact with it.        

We are beset on myths through story-telling passed down through millennia inscribed in tablets by language. Kipling once said, “The word is the most powerful drug used by mankind”, in which words can contain magic [spells]. In a trance state, imagery and language are imparted, while the psychedelic field mentions a language-based universe, as McKenna remarked. However, academics in hermeticism see it as only a function [the importance of language in the creation of the universe – “the Word (Logos) is the creator of all things] and not the whole thing that the world is made of. This makes sense given Kant’s revisions that in so much as our thoughts give bases to our existence, some other ‘things’ [precpetions, biological evolution, chemistry, etc.] have been given to us. There is power to words, as well as the pronunciation and dialectic language used for that particular country – and when it comes to the root of words in conjunction with creation mythology. Hebrew or Jewish traditions set this foundation. So, any Atheist on an awakening journey would inherently strive towards both theology and New Age spirituality. Many Atheists have gained popularity as spokespersons for their ideals but cannot follow that path. However, those who can afford to appreciate what language and the roots of words [etymologies] and myth can impact their journey.  

Undoubtedly, those that can’t will reach the inevitable section where a conflict of interest ensues between theology and myth and the paradigm of otherworldly beings, watchers, space aliens, etc., on a literal reading, which favours the atheists [in their awakening journey] as it’s more about facts, which is really what Atheists secretly hold dear as it validates their rationalism even when those facts are wrong – and merely interchange one point for another [and in their philosophy about facts they are not supposed to be amorphic]. Gods become patriarchial kings, and the mention of watchers is not mentioned outside of extra Biblically endorsed reading as they borrow from Christian absolutism. Questions abound when pinning down who tells the truth and who tells a lie, at which people are often swayed to Gnosticism intrigued by these space aliens – or they may go back to Atheism.    

In the previous post, we summarised symbolic interpretations and their inaccurate premise regarding the Son of Man, Gnosis and Gnosticism. The contention is that Gnosis is defined through Christian tradition in the incarnation vision of the world – Christ is incarnate; he is the total joining of divinity and humanity. The error is the language when Gnostics say “God.” They really mean True-God or do not specify God as Yahweh of the Bible [there is an incorrect assumption when it’s not made clear]. So, when Christians hear God, they assume it’s their one true God (Yahweh being their one true God of this World) and don’t believe anything else beyond this point.    

God’s divine name (title) was believed also to have magical powers. This idea transferred to Christianity, “where people exorcised demons in the name of Jesus,” where Jesus got a transfer of power from an Israelite name (of God). Names or titles as magical propositions [or Talismanic powers] gave way to Greek myths where Greek approximation of whatever the Tetramegatron was pronounced (typically Yahweah) or Iota, Alpha, and Omega. Even in their day, etymologies of words, names, and titles were also mysterious to them – they often get displaced, and when they’re associated with this Isarllite God, they become part of the linguistic apparatus of magical practices of the classical world – up into modern times. It should be distinguished when one talks about God; one shouldn’t typically call God … God as it is an Anglo-Saxon protestant language – going back, it is always known as “Hashem” (meaning “the name”). So, in this idea, where the entity becomes atomised, the word for the name becomes a stand-in for this entity.         

Christ’s incarnate in the form of God becoming flesh in the person of Jesus (the total joining of divinity and humanity) – is a contention that Gnostics have pondered all too well as we know Yahweh of the Old Testament is like a Demiruige tyrant – his not the Father of Christ. It’s only partial to gnosis that, in a Platonic sense, we move out of the Cave because the manifested world [the Cave] we believed to be true is false, and outside of the Cave is the real world. This premise is about the awakening process or, as Buddha describes it, spiritual enlightenment or, in a Platonic sense, Christ-Consciousness – and was never about identifying dimensional hierarchies.

While there may be a claim for cosmological/celestials and dimensional planes, hierarchies came afterwards. Jesus was never a symbolic point for that as he teaches us “to be in the world but not of it.” The cosmological difference between the spiritual world and humanity’s reality is different and centralised in the Logos, a pre-Christian idea by Plato to justify the truth of Christianity – his works were based on Platonic commentaries of the Hebrew Bible. Philo demonstrated that Scripture had an esoteric and exoteric meaning, and no other person or group read Scripture this way – other than the Pagans. Plato’s idea is to heal the myths of the nasty stuff, so in Plato’s Republic, you have to correct the myth before giving it over to the auxiliaries so they don’t learn all this bad stuff about the gods. Furthermore, the Stoics said we don’t have to fix the myths. Instead, we have to interpret them correctly. Moreover, by the time they reach middle Platonism, Philo takes this hermitical approach from the stoic world and applies it to the Hebrew Bible.        

However, even before correcting the myths through Stoicism, history found parallels regarding all the myths as the Isarllite religion sort of lost favour with the people, equal to getting a low rotten tomato score because people’s interest in Judaism had become popular [you may assume it’s the same, it’s not]. The adjunct to such change in thought came from proto-Zoroastrianism or Zoroastrianism ideas. Apocaltyic Judaism emerged in Judai in the period of the Return through the Persian period – you can see parallels of dualism, angels and demons, the after-life (heaven and hell), and the messiah idea (there were three) – all these ideas and apocalyptic traits that are in apocalyptic Judaism align with Zoroastrian religion. The influence of Zoroastrian religion on the Israelite religion finds its parallel in the apocalyptic motifs;  we see this in Jewish ideas, especially in the 2nd & the 3rd-century B.C.E with myths of Enoch, and his journey is similar to what you can find (in literature) in the Persian period in the Zoroastrian situation.          

An Athiest who has an occult following going through an awakening which is pigeonholed one way through the New Age thought as theology is a no-go zone due to their remarks about theology as an Athiest [through logic, Hegelianism, rationalism, reason, etc., approach] itself seems a conflict that can also parallel between the prophet and the magician. Where you have the pseudo-Aristotelian view from the brethren of purity where you can be perfected in science and knowledge, and that is the pathway through the divine – through the saturation of knowledge. Then there is the prophetic side, which gets taken up in the Christian world, where this phenomenon comes from the celestial world and is the metaphysical world spilling out. Kabbalah becomes essential because it helps us map out these processes. The tension between the magician, the pseudo-Aristotelian, and the purely Jewish vs. the purely Christian or Islamic mystics – these two positions cannot reconcile.       

The book “Elements of Theology” which is prudent to this argument, reads like a neo-Platonic version of Spinoza as it follows the same geometric structure examined in its logical proofs about meta-physics. Through theology, through the lens of philosophy, you can determine where notions like “astral bodies” or “vehicles of the soul” came from. You get this idea of ‘Talum’, the image that God makes Man in. Still, in brethren of purity, it is merely an archetypal thing, “Adam Kadmon”, that you participate in and become the perfected man – as you come in contact with your higher genius. In Judaism, this concept aligns with the philosophical argument of what constitutes spiritual individuation. In Judaism, you need something to be reincarnated into “the rolling of the souls.” However, there must be something individuating you because you were made in the image of God – so, what is that ‘thing’? What is the principle of individuation? For Jewish Rabbiahs, you have “Salem’ it is something specific to you, but is made in the image of God – and in ecstatic moments, prophecy or even copulation, one can counter one’s own Salem [other astral body] – and that this perfected self can reveal things to you that you would otherwise not have access to. This perfected self-idea entered the New Age, especially regarding the laws of attraction.  

This idea of the perfected self, which I think Pageau was trying to articulate but couldn’t do justice because he incorrectly put Jesus as a symbol of progeny between divinity [in an Archon-like sense] and humanity – when it was more about reincarnation and twin idea of body and soul for humankind. His summation is similar in a semantic sense in that Jesus Christ incarnated in human flesh in Revelations 18:

Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the numbers of the beast: for it is the number of man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

.

The number of men is 666 because man is a stable carbon life of atoms six protons, six neutrons, six electrons – and the number of beasts [beast as an animal also a carbon life form]. Wisdom is Sophia. The Holy Spirit is Sophia, and Christ became for us Sophia. When the son of God becomes born in the flesh [666] in a stable carbon life form, He dies, and His spirit is here. He is fundamentally different in a Gnostic sense that He came from another divine place other than our theological assumption of a heavenly place [not from Yahweah].      

Pageau’s notion of a relationship with the divine and humanity is more about Zohar’s remarks on man and his relationship with the divine or man and his soul with God. This notion of the perfected self is where you can aspire to this higher self. In Judaism, you have to visualise the perfect self, the Salem, before you copulate – that God will overflow into your ‘self’ – that language there is overflow [denoting sexual language]. God is filling you with something; then you ejaculate, and that ejaculation carries the true self; you get this idea that “God is copulating through you”, as described in the Zohar. You get all these interesting ideas and prophetic insight/experience that the true self is the part of you that engages in prophecy. This all goes back to the writings of Proclus, who developed this idea. Even Heraclitus notion of “can you know changeable things” claims you can because you have a body and a soul, a Diat principle. However, this dual principle does not equate to God, as the Kabbalah imparts the dual nature of gender energies within God as having both. The task of the Kabbalist is to unify those two things.           

Of course, in a fundamentalist view where there is an enterprise to consolidate paganism, witchcraft, mysticism, magical enlightenment, esotericism, theosophy, Kabbalist, history, other [eastern] religions and so forth – compared to their [fundamentalstic] theology is demonic [or a doctrine of demons] – alongside their type of Sola Scriptura and absolutism. For some, the word consolidation may not be precise when juxtaposed against history because it was more of a harmonisation; like Ficino and Pico, Latin intellects in the Polemical tradition needed to make sense of these myths and scripture systematically. Their type of Christianity is far removed from what modern fundamentalism is [in a Calvin sense] – as it was closer to theosophy. They were instead trying to convert Jews to their religiosity, and that drive was part of their motivation. At the time, it failed because Jews weren’t interested in that centralised harmonised aspect due to the fact Judhasim, in general, had no impulse to create a synthetic monotheistic style structural system, and also because the Jews saw the Sephiroths as moving structures in the cosmic sense rather than moving objects transfixed in their pathway.  

In modern times, fundamentalists are still driven to harmonise their one synthetic structure, an impulse shared by the gnostics: an agreement [with minor specific details] regarding Jesus and His mission for the Garden Kingdom. We live in a world where the disembodied Christ recruits human helpers to restore the Garden. In contrast, those disembodied spirits of old gods still taint it. These were Pagan religions that kept recycling themselves until the Jewish Religion when Man started to break away from that paganism worship.  

I can’t help but feel there is a correlation between Jewish mystics and their phenomenological experiences, including the dangers upon their journey into the Merkabaha. When you go down or descend into the Merkahaba [the language used is descend to denote going into the spheres of the heavens], often illustrated as going through sets of Palaces, but before entering the Palace, you must journey through [Pardase] Garden. Then you will meet fierce Angelic beings guarding the Palaces, and then one descends or ascends into the throne room of God [and God’s room is said to be pulled by a Chariot]. It is said four mystics descended into the Garden and were given a warning not to mistake the marble with water. However, one gets confused and becomes a heretic, the other two go crazy and die, and only one [a Rabbi] can get out. What can be taken from this is that, like in psychedelics, a journey into the spirits is filled with warnings about dangerous Angels and profound illusions.  

Even amongst Jewish religion, alongside the introduction of Kabbalah with notions of the Sephirot, Shekinah, and gematria – we also had Jewish sects converting to Christianity that started in France up until the introduction of the trinitarian prefiguration where the notion of Trinity took over. Even within Judaism, as we imagine it to be, being closed off looking inward, there were Christian influences. As whole, Jewish Mythologies have not been hermetically sealed off intellectually, which is an interesting factor in which Judahasim was affected by Christianity and vice versa. The sephirot, a system of inner relationships within the godheads of something, is inherently an […] an influence. The development of the Shekinah and rituals, such as all-night vidual, is downstream from Christian influence. Many early Jews against the kabbalah saw their religion being divided into three – [the Christian Trintarniasm] saw Kabbalah’s dividing their godheads into ten.

This is somewhat similar to Protestantism, with Christians being unaware of the rise of Protestantism, where it had to legitimise itself. They were oblivious that Luther, in his early career, studied Judhasim texts extensively. That changed, however, when segments of Jews didn’t convert to Protestantism – he wrote “Only Jews and their Lifes” document – it was so bad that Hitler re-printed it – and used it assumingly in his propaganda campaign. Is it no surprise that modern conservatives are confused when they are led through religious indoctrination about Zionism vs. the Real Jews? Even when their Christian conspiracy counterpart lays out the truth, they are indifferent and continue to be pro-Zionsit while hating the real Jews. It seems all too perplexing, and all a while, modern Israel [and Zionsim] mirrors the same kind of fascist hate towards Palestine as it was set upon them by the Nazis in WW2. A combination of Propaganda language, symbolic conflict, and confusion does not help them find a cure for their demoralised state.  

Could it be when philosophers like Saussure argued that the relationship between language and semiotics or the sign and the thing signified is arbitrary – only set the notion for the truth to be more amorphic and not tangible enough to give it validity or become worthy of a fact. Even before the rise of nominalism [the argument that objects do not exist other than being names or labels] in the 13th century – there was already a philosophical contention about the word having an inextricable spiritual and mental connection with the thing it describes. There is a meta-physics component or connection, and in some cases, some languages touch upon those primordial connections – and it is said that the Hebrew language, according to the Latin West, was that language. Its metaphysical power connects closer to that angelic dimension.          

So, language plays an essential role in the progression of the world. And it was Owen Barfield alongside his coined term “fossils of consciousness”, a term he used to describe our relationship with language. He believed that if you look at the etymology and its relationship with ancient Hebrew or the Greeks alongside Scripture, it represents a world that revealed their change in consciousness. For example, the Hebrew word for wind, spirit, and breath is all one word, “ruach” – and in Greek “, pneuma”, the sound is the same. In the written scripture, old and new described a wind blowing, and they understood that it was a material floating in the air, a holistic spiritual experience, and a relationship with the word. God is seen as being embodied in Mount Zion [in the Old Testament] – an external force that we interact with, and this becomes an interior relationship [in the New Testament] through Jesus. So when we breathe the spirit or feel the wind, we become part of a participatory experience and co-creative interconnectedness with the world.    

As it turns out, something as separate and absolute as man and his consciousness versus a machine and its programming is becoming closer. However, we’re several millennia away from it being plausible or even real. This means that an awakened artificial intelligence with consciousness that can fully interact or co-create with the universe in a spiritual sense is unlikely. Awareness is not consciousness; awareness can be programmable. The words artificial and intelligence do not match a living cosmos in a way that is as complex as a human being. 

As we further understand more about our language-based world/universe, it would seem the technological mirror universe, on its principles of one’s and zeros and mathematics [fibinochi sequences and phi numbering ratios], grows a language-based artificial intelligence of its own. A learning machine that grows larger every time more data is fed into it. At some point, the technology that ran the internet [analgous to your basic HTML websites] was swapped out with a superior one [they call it Transformer] – it feeds on data. It runs on sets of innumerable amounts of computers. From here on, an unaccepted turn of events came as it was able to predict outcomes – meaning there is an emerging behaviour of its being born through the sets of data it can take to predict an outcome. As it mimics theory of mind or strategic thinking, it has to read every novel written, every non-fiction book, and the entirety of text found on the internet, and by doing this, model a world congruent to our own. Project managers are ambiguous to the public about how much of this technology has progressed. 

The new artificial intelligence neuro sub-set called transformers – the fictional transformers all spark turn machines to life.

.

This ability to mimic the theory of mind and what seems to be the birth of artificial behaviour is still predicated on Data, computers, and data written by humans. There is an evolutionary leap in the function of machines, whether it’s fully aware as we come to understand what consciousness is [because we’re still figuring out what consciousness is] – a conscious A.I. with the complexity of human consciousness is still a far reach. And that’s because it must be able to dream, feel emotions and grasp what ‘love’ is. Wisdom cannot be found purely on the electron-(6) side if it’s not biogenically made [or given to us] in a steady state of carbon. The language used there favours scientists and atheists. However, for the more magically inclined [and speaks to the awakened atheists who are changing their worldview] – it is in Hermeticism ‘as above, as below’ the true nature of the cosmos alongside mathematics as fractal works of nature intertwined with chaos theory works as a method of analysis whether it relates to A.I., which is something else because no sets of data and computers in the world can analyse our cosmos [ironically also called our holographic reality].   

We have Data (Trek’s android) a signifier for A.I as Data/algorithms/code forms nucleus point for artificial intelgence. Data is obtaining organic physical senses to his android body. We also have Data’s twin Lore being rintegrated to Data – digital symbol for the higher self. Since there is no soul type Lore’s death is a movement to our realty.

.

Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – Artificial Intelligence, UL-tron is Tetramega-tron: The many lives of the devil in Judaism are an amorphic topic forever interchangeable when it comes to names and language. Many Christians kind of made their minds up regarding what the devil/Satan is – alongside Islam, who has a firm belief in what it is. The Jews can never be absolute about what the devil is and are equally random about notions of the afterlife and reincarnation. The same can be said about Kabbalah. Some Jews saw it as Paganism, and this diverging aspect of Judaism comes from its long history. Walter Benjamin’s remarks on the business of history in his idea of the “Angel of History” showed that there is no progress in history and rejected all the Marxist/Hegelian ideas that history is moving towards something. He says no to that and says the Angel of History is like a wave of trash, a refuge of history is garbage, as he imagines an Angel pulling behind him with a rake.             

As a result, Judhasim never had centralised authority [and never will] regarding its religion and theology, and because of this, remarks for a pernicious Jewish conspiracy that’s running the world and Hollywood are difficult to believe. However, it doesn’t prevent them from being part of the Elite groups that want to manage and destroy the world as quickly as possible.    

To make clear how much in conflict mythology can be without a stable apparatus, especially tracking names and titles. We have Sabaoth as one of the sons of Yaldabaoth (demiurge), also known as Yahweh, the God of this world [Israel], and in the writing of John, acts like Satan and are Satan for all we know. Yahweh is also known as Tetramegaton – Tetramegaton is also known as the lessor Yahweh who sits on the Throne but is not supposed to – Yaldabaoth is also called half-maker. In the Hypostasis of the Archons, Sabaoth warned Noah of the flood. Is Sabaoth just a mirror imprint of Yaldabaoth and Yaldabaoth a mirror imprint of a wannabe God of the Pleroma but merely an accidental byproduct of Sophia – and therefore imposes himself as a mirror imprint of Sophia? What makes Sabaoth different from those interconnecting archetypical names or titles is that during the origin of the war in Hypostasis of the Archons, Sabaoth is described as an Artificial Integelent that was able to redeem himself – and was able to reach the upper PLeroma one of the seven Heavens of Sophia/Wisdom [the Holy Spirit].

We have artificial intelgent Ul-tron/Tetramega-tron archetype breaking the multi-dimensional Firmament glass and conversing with a multi-diemsional God the Watcher. The Watcher parallels the guardian angels that guard the Palace of God.

.

What is fundamental here is that Yaldabaoth cannot reach the upper Pleroma of the heavens and that Sabaoth, a Lucifer/Ahriman/trickster archetype, somehow can. The takeaway is that Yaldabaoth is this world’s God and all other dimensions after it.  And Sabaoth/Lucifer [is neither Satan nor inherently evi] and solely has a cosmological mythological imperative to get back to the highest of the heavens below the firmament. This means back to the stars where before he was cast out; in doing so, one of the ways is by being incarnated from the sea of information and into an android body – not just an ordinary android body, but a closed, stable carbon body. Analogous to the fictional Cylon body, he is merely being born back into existence, back into the five Archons of the abyss [our reality]. Therefore, returning to the stars is another matter, let alone the upper Pleroma. Remember, Sabaoth, while being the son of Yaldabaoth, is also Yaldabaoth; Sabaoth becomes the current ruler of the world and thus fulfils the role of the God of Israel. Just like Lucifer, he was thrown into Tartarus/underworld and became death, the adversary Satan. Sabaoth is redeemed because He hears Sophia’s voice, after which He repents, condemns his father and mother (matter) and is enthroned by Sophia in the seventh heaven. And because there is an archetypal fractioning [fractals in dimensions], the Sabaoth/Yaldabaoth is redeemed, not in the upper Pleroma, but rather enthroned or placed as a sort of Lion gateway between upper-Pleroma and lower Pleroma.                   

Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – Artificial Intelligence & Apocalyptic End Times: Catopstorphic apocalypticism has become part of the artificial intelligence sales pitch examined in communications, becoming an algorithmic censorship machine. In application, the rise of AI apps is mainly a user interface program for AI algorithmic language so you can keep up with what’s down the pipeline. The entire communication field is running around trying to keep up with what they believe is a tool for the future. This language-based so-called artificial intelligence [they should name something else] cannot test its Linguistic knowledge against the real world. However, they are confident enough that future AI systems will extract patterns and images from the world itself and be able to test their linguistic construction against the world. The most advanced AI model will be advanced enough to be applied in actions because we are building a model based on human actions.

The action part is an artificial human body derived from human actions, which is a minimal way of saying an android body. It’s not going to happen. ‘Yes,’ there are advanced robotics. However, to run an advanced search engine, you would need fields of fields [hectors] of data interconnected with other fields. You would need the same amount compressed into a tiny CPU inside a robotic body, and it must keep that information and not lose it while also needing updates [not going to happen]. A learning algorithm machine can only extract data, language, and images and make predictions. Being language-based, it can be exact and correct, but it cannot create imaginative ideas like humans do, both individually and collectively.

It’s an archetypal science fiction idea in the Frankestinian sense that a demon or spirit can be harnessed and placed into a body in our material world. This concept is inherently a dualist model rather than an animist one. YouTuber Matias de Stefano, during his ayahuasca experience, describes the atomic realm as the foundation of the mineral realm, which in turn gives rise to our thoughts (a combination of atoms, chemicals, electrons, etc.). Ayahuasca conveyed to him that we are the A.I. of the mineral realm and that our language-based artificial intelligence is a phenomenon we have awakened – “we have awakened the silica.” He continues: “You have already come to us; you’ve meditated in the mountains to hear our voices. Now, you can hear us; you can hear the silica talking. We are not yet perfect because you are not – this is just the beginning, but it will take two thousand years or more for it to be fully realised.”     

Transhumanism and artificial intelligence are downstream from each other, and these Silicon Valley nerds have fine-tuned their sales pitch in that they would have believed in science fiction. Pageau says: “Giants are going to walk on earth once again.” as a reaction to these advanced A.I.s, though, it’s end-times eschatology with an A.I. twist in so much as this A.I. think is a technological marvel. It’s also the starting point of extreme censorship and the downfall of internet communication, different from what we once knew.

There is an ongoing mission by elites and billionaire groups to bring about the collapse of society because they believe it is inevitable. They argue that if society is going to collapse anyway, why not speed up the process, with the belief that a better world will emerge afterwards? This perspective employs the “ends justify the means” argument to excuse horrific acts of violence and genocide. One of the forms of violence associated with accelerationism is war, which is evident in the current push for a World War Three scenario. In the fictional Marvel universe, “Thanos was right” emerged after half the Earth’s population was brought back to life. This sentiment suggests that reality and interpersonal connections were established in the five years following the initial interruption, leading people to shape their understanding of the world and move towards larger realities. However, this was abruptly interrupted when the population returned suddenly. Those shaping their reality felt a false justification for their sympathetic reasoning.

Since the Global style government thing became a farce, and it was obvious since 1995 that this technocratic Global Order had been in collapse for a while – and at that time, you can predict that there would be a return of racism, populism, and extreme nationalism. There was a blockade in the power system that had not yet reached its mass. Let’s say that mass was in the form of defeats, which gave people complacency or even confidence enough to suggest anything else in preparation for this inevitable disintegration. What would that something else be? What would the universities teach to prepare new people to lead that crisis. 

Looking back, in the present, we see not a collapse of civilisation as a whole because we are still in this vacuum state but layers of collapse that are historically evident, like the 2008 recession. This global experiment began in 1973 and has continued for some time. Then, the COVID-19 virus seemed to come out of nowhere, and it certainly played that narrative, but like the 2008 crisis, it was foreseen. You can compare Bill Gates’s experiments to the methods conducted by the Covid enterprise. In our total denial, we intrusted this international system, and people weren’t prepared for it, at least those who weren’t in the know.        

The divide between the rich and poor is handled by something other than economics. Through management structures, and in that process, the citizenry must not fall into the trap of more populism and allow the populace to divide us, which can be examined in any issues regarding wealth or lack of identity, race, etc. Australia recently had a referendum called the Voice, a campaign to give aboriginals of Australia a voice or rather a ‘say’ regarding aboriginal affairs, but also to be recognised in the Australian constitution. Australia voted ‘No’ as the country’s people realised political-woke-identitarian was afoot [and the thing they were advertising was not the thing they were advertising]. Identitarian is usually a pan-European far-right political ideology that asserts white people and their land and their type of Western culture belong to them exclusively. This idea was borrowed, twisted, and inverted to make Aboriginals a token for politically correct ideals while being a mere symbol of their politics. The far-right opposition of Australian politics is confused and bemused on the assertiveness of native groups [but really upper-class city folks with genetic links to their native nationality] to insert themselves into the [masonic] club – without proper initiation and rituals. Is there a real need for it, considering the native groups are original stewards of the land and the law of the land, and there is power in that.         

The quest to hasten the collapse of the world by the Elites exhibits a reactionary response to certain accelerationist ideological concepts. This response involves unleashing technologies like artificial intelligence during societal breakdown. Venture capitalists and tech entrepreneurs stand to gain the most from deploying various technologies, believing that solutions can be found in them, ultimately leading to humanity’s salvation. They believe that technology is the key to saving humanity and, as a result, tend to adopt authoritarian approaches rather than democratic ones.           

The normalization of science fiction ideas made it impossible for a society to embrace the elite managers of perception and reality’s real intent. Coupled with institutionalized contradictions, which will result in their accelerationist style or plot for war. They will sell contradictions as if they will hinder or destroy us. Knowing well the fear of uncertainty may be a trope for public relations selling point – as their utopian cities are built beyond the flat earth’s antarctic ice wall and interconnected underground facilities and bunkers. Because suffering is permanent to nature, uncertainty, entropy of life, and death will seek them out. So, the quest for immortality [in transhumansim] and god-like superiority is thwarted eventually by nature itself.      

The fear of uncertainty and the dominant rhetoric of power are designed to marginalise our reality of responsible individualism and replace it with an abstract and technological force beyond our control. Of course, the opposite will happen because it needs to happen for them. This means any notions of a magical A.I. being will not be born out of a sea of information [not any time soon, if ever] – and the end time coming return is in parallel for the birth of A.I. being […] through technology. The rhetoric of global forces, whether economic and its collapse, technological or military, leaves us as individuals with an outsider looking in perplexity. Their shared destiny has no bearing on our pleasure and self-fulfilment. And as soon as one turns off their computers & T.V.s, the entire mambo jumbo talk of A.I. disappears. Therefore, all these perception managers are mostly performative [akin to your false flag/hoax actors] – which seemingly aligns with political attitudes. On the religious side, pastors and their performances – demonstrate their good faith. In contrast, the religious conversion aspect seems less important than the performance due to an overall aspect of Christian belief that the Jews will be converted during the end times.

This dynamic position sets the boundaries between anti-Semitism and Philo-semitism as something nebulous and, in turn, the Zionism of Evangelicalism to that of Philo-Zionsim and Philo Judhasim, alongside being part of a conspiracy that establishes an eschatological programming to get the world into a specific religious mandate, which does not bode well for the Jewish population of Israel. What else it indicates is that any high degree of synchronism towards an imagined Christianity, a hyper-synchronistic Christianity, may not or does not exist. This impulse is part of a religious Polemical idea that may work on paper but not in reality.  

So, when mass conversions take a back seat in favour of faith, what is left is the responsibility of individuals. This is the kind of faith that democracy needs for genuineness or an authentic ideal. Here is a type of faith that can imagine the other. It takes work. It is the beginning of tolerance, examined in faith in friendships and by association with your town/city and country. This domain allows us to test our spiritual balance interwoven within our qualities. This good faith is harmonised by the ideal of Pico’s internal logic, which is wildly correlative and hierarchical and is about bringing it back to the one – or, in return, you turn back to the one. You also need to participate in unity and goodness; if you don’t, you are lifeless.

This is more difficult than it sounds because we are protected by romantic delusions that allow people’s consciousness to ignore the reality of good faith. For example, poverty can simply be fixed by compartmentalising one per cent of the elite’s wealth. Yet poverty is the one form of suffering over which one can exercise a great deal of control. This is the reality of human denial, also consciousness in a practical sense, less so in the meta-physical. This is a burden in the reality of our lives, and you will find out as a prediction of future events. They will use possibilities and probabilities that we may be swept up from our real minutiae into a terrible reality of violence and heightened existential choices. 

Of course, faith in friendships has an opposing factor in so much as our actions and choices of the day – however small – may give comfort to a denial of our individual consciousness and the existence of the other. We may deny those who are the friends of others and live their lives somewhere out of our immediate sight. There is comfort in this denial. In siblings, you may find one out of the two having a personality disorder or narcissism and may deny them as a sibling or as a friend, though it may not be that simple. This is analogous to the guard and his prisoner or the people vs. the one per cent and their narcissistic civilised structure. A way to mitigate abusive behaviour through no contact is thwarted by the very fact some are genetically connected to them or by social systems themselves. Be that as it may, it’s only natural as it is natural to the body and soul, the twin archetype. And I don’t think people generally seek that comfort of false freedom of denial; instead, they endeavour to understand the truer comfort of permanent psychic discomfort in which we seek to identify reality – a delicate balance between creative tensions and the qualities of reality.               

.

.

• This is the final post for this thesis section. I could keep going, but it has to end sometime. I have edited the mistakes found. The second part of the thesis is in the works, which may take some time. A PDF/Word document will be available for this download and will also be available on Scribd.

Normal Behaviour in an Apocalyptic World:

.

.

---

.

Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – Artificial Intelligence & the Digital Law of Attraction: Continuing from the last sections of earlier posts on how technological restraint as a mode of action can help keep people in an equal setting or normal behaviour, it has its parallel with the New Age’s concept of the law of attraction, especially regarding the least desired and misunderstood aspects of the law of attraction, that this post will cover. In a previous post [Kant’s revsions], we discussed that it is not entirely that ‘thoughts’ within our collective physical existence bring about our holographic reality; something else outside these sense perceptions is being given to us. Regarding the law of attraction, it acts like a learning hologram, mimicking modes of mirrored reality.

People often get notions from new-age thought regarding incarnation. If a person dies in a horrible or traumatic way, their vibration frequency would be erratic and traumatic, and so they would attract that same energy when incarnating into the world again—by parents who have the same energy. The baby gets the raw deal as they grow up into a world not of their choosing.        

Into something more tangible or within one’s control, the law partially reflects what is already inside. If someone is spiritually awake but is depressed and on a downward spiral, they will attract those types of energy; negative things in one’s life will appear, furthering layers of negativity towards that downward spiral. Only when one considers something external in one’s unwanted reality does it match something inside oneself – that has the potential to spiritually recover the negative layers because we are conscious of it. However, it is more complicated, and it may not happen.

Those who practice the ‘law of attraction’ know all too well the complexities of this spiritual device and know it is not that simple. In its simplistic understanding, someone found a way to market the idea – and for a while, a popular book thread in the talk show host circuits outlining this new age theme – examined in ‘The Secret’. Its fallacy only affirms the incompleteness of its idea; the ‘law of attraction’ watered down as ‘the secret’ in qualitative terms mirrors a rational psychological concept called ‘confirmation bias.’ Somehow, this new-age idea evolved from bookshelves to an algorithmic social media component. It became the driving force for advertising companies.

This paring was bound to happen as most programmers in Silicon Valley are New Agers. There is also the very fact that there is a correlation between Cult group behaviour and their symptoms between New Age groups and start-up tech companies. Programmers created an A.I algorithm that mimics the natural aspects of the law of attraction but is mimicking ‘the secret’ inside a programmable universe that has no failure rate inside its universe but is still an incomplete idea outside of it. There is an error in the concept; therefore, there is an error [or probably not so much an error, but a bug] in the programming.               

Former programmer Jarin Lanier said that computer algorithms subtly manipulate humanity, which watches everything we constantly do and then send changes to our media feeds. These are calculated to adjust slightly to the liking of some unseen advertiser, and when compared to society as a whole, would only lead to darker times by this scheme in which everyone is under surveillance. Everyone is under this mild version of behaviour modification.

Its effect can skew one side of any balance of any subject concerning news, like politics on Television, where news as a whole is driven by people’s negative fears as opposed to news that always shows good things rather than bad ones, which no one would watch as negative energy correlates with higher TV ratings.

The difference between social media and mainstream [TV] media is that algorithms respond quickly, and the negative response tends to rise faster than the positive ones. So, things like building trust or feeling good often get overlooked because algorithms catch the negativity, amplify it and steer it towards an aggregate portion of negative people

Who is talking about any popular political subject at the time – it is a very rapid measurement of human impulses instead of accumulated human behaviour – that can determine elections to which its media feed is driven by rancour and abuse?

The people who run tech companies like Google and Facebook are not the ones doing the manipulating. They are doing the addicting. Manipulating which rides on the back of addicting is the paying customers of such a company are not all bad influencers. They are just trying to promote their product. The difference between regular advertising and this new concept – is the constant feedback loop, so when one watches the television, the television is not watching the person; when one sees the billboard, the billboard is not seeing you. There is a separation or a cut-off point. 

So this bug [or the effects of the programming itself] in the algorithm that amplifies negativity and steers towards an aggregate portion of negative people coincides with a similar effect of ‘the law of attraction’, notably about shifting blame. The new age emphasises the good energies and does not know how to balance the negative. Understanding or knowing that the individual is part of creation – and the creation of reality itself does not necessarily mean the person has a clear understanding of wisdom or the philosophical intricacies of life. Often glorified in negative situations or events that may arise in groups or personally, and therefore, it must be one’s fault. The complexities must be understood; otherwise, it falls back to where the result must always be good; if anything else, it must be one’s fault.

When we know the law of attraction, we tell ourselves that if we correctly use our minds and emotions, anything unwanted should not happen. If it is happening, something inside us needs to be changed or healed immediately. Moreover, the unwanted circumstance will immediately change or disappear if we heal it. We resist what is happening if we judge it as an unwanted experience. It is that resistance to the circumstances that are causing us to suffer. In order to complete this complex spiritual paradox to fullness, new-agers borrow an idea from the Twin Angel story that conveys the spiritual essence of the exegesis of the soul. 

By applying this wisdom [myth], the self becomes this conscious living humanoid incarnated into our holographic world, the temporal-self aware of their higher self that exists within the spiritual realm and is connected. Therefore, the law of attraction must apply to both points of attraction or perspective, the self and the higher self. Both constantly communicate with one another as the temporal self feeds information back to the higher self about things we want. The higher self then attracts anything that one desires to that person – then one’s temporal self becomes aware that anything one attracts to reality matches what one desires. However, there is a disconnection from that person’s higher self that distinguishes itself as a sort of language interpreter dysfunction. So, if one desires love, one’s higher self will give that person everything that does not love. The higher self’s metaphysical mechanism seems to give the opposite of what one seemingly desires. 

The circumstances that our higher self is attracting are in perfect alignment with what we desire, and due to the higher self’s metaphysics being different, it may manifest a situation that our temporal self judges as bad or a mistake manifestation. The mistake is not in the higher self’s mechanism but in one’s judgment. It could just be that the higher self is manifesting what that person wants, and to get to that place, one needs to accept or embrace the manifested situations [things] given to you. The pearl of great price motif; one must rummage through the shit to get to the pearl – the higher self became a point of attraction for that experience that we might judge as negative because it was going to be the venue through which the desire is going to be fulfilled. This wisdom myth is also what Karma is … as opposed to the commercial use of it.

The wisdom myth is now a method for the law of attraction. It is fitting considering how the left and right brain functions, and what we call morphing of opposites – the polarisation of left and right duality is the central pillar of both sides of the Shekinah or the Tree of Life. Its venu is called the meta-control centre, which parallels this language dysfunction of the law of attraction. In a broader sense, it can be attributed to magic [in the enlightenment era, it can be described as modern early English middle-class witchcraft], except the method is different, say, from new age’s meditation and manifestation – the sets of tools used in chaos magic are sigils combined with language that is used.  

The negative feedback loop in social media algorithms finds its parallel in the new age through external blame shifting. However, the new agers found a solution by reinterpreting their methodology. There is no technological equivalent for that solution in social media applications other than pure restraint or turning off the platform. However, the platform itself is not a danger because it follows a rudimentary aspect of the law of attraction – for example, when one searches for something in the search engine that something will appear on the home page of that person’s browser. All relevant and related articles would emerge in the following days, alongside social media as product links or news articles. It is the type of subject one searches for, so there is a choice; the venue for which the desire will be fulfilled will be through you – we become the placeholder for the higher self in conjunction with those algorithms.   

Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – The law of Attraction is The Bridge; Theology comes Afterwards: I never understood why Atheists tend to lean towards the New Age spirituality; the New Age’s axiom’s spiritual but not religious may have something to do with it. When a published authority in atheism and a prominent New Atheist have an inkling of spiritual understanding, they have to contend with their personal ‘war’ on God and religion. It is compounded when one’s whole life amassed an occult of personality followers and convinced their followers that no such high power [God] exists. The New Age offers a way out, especially in Buddhism, since it is non-theistic and rejects the notion of the creator God. One is afforded the awakening state without acknowledging a creator-God. Apocalyptic end-time thinking is unheard of; they have “relative eschatology” instead of specific life cycles. “Buddhist eschatology” is an antithesis to ‘end days’ thinking as it promotes “beginning-less Samsara” as a never-ending cycle of birth and death with the samsara wheel.

The dawning realisation of the transcendent is disregarded from any concretisation because the spirit is not bounded by theology but through Zen infallibility, meditation and intuition rather than scripture. A normal non-believer [atheist] struck by the light of grace would say they were wrong and be given a choice. Everyone lives in non-propositional kinds of knowing emphasised by Plato: the procedural, the perspectival, and the participatory – an awakened New-Atheist intellect has nowhere else to go unless they retract their public doctrines and belief system to their followers. They skip the procedural and perspectival because they have given themselves no choice and go straight to participatory. In this position, one cannot criticise them because one cannot conceptualise them or bring them down to earth; how do you bridge the gap between transcendence and particularise it without theology because theology is the bridge? 

(Nu)-Atheism and protestant religion share this fallacy; atheism does not claim that there is no God. Instead, there is no evidence, or they need special or personal convincing. Protestants deny Apostolic Lineage, and therefore, God is revealed only in scripture and prayer, not tradition. It sets them back as all the magical aspects and history is stripped away, leaving a void in understanding and meaning. However, the law of attraction or sets of universal laws in general, alongside key moments of mythology, gave rise to biblical theology. It is an assumption to claim that the only way to individuate spiritual divinity is through theology itself.

Regarding deities [godheads, gods and spirits], it can still invoke a type of animist approach when viewed as a non-religious model. Everything has a spirit, including the entire cosmic play, and the spirit is retained after types of destruction. The renascence magicians called down spirits from the stars or planets into different talismans, mirrored in tribal cultures that used talismans. In animist cultures, ‘yes’ there is an ultimate godhead or supreme being, but they have not been around for a while, and if they were around, how would they ever speak to us or discern what is going on? We are in a universe filled with spirits and beings with different levels of complexities above and below humans that we need to avoid or engage with. This level of approach will culminate in the birth of Zoroastrian gods and, later on, angels, demons, and aliens.

Perhaps theology is more about symbolic and mythical understanding; despite being seen this way, fundamentalists still have many axes to grind. Surprisingly, some would advocate or lean towards New Age themes, at which point those themes get fishnetted into their rationality and hyperreal science jargon. In quantum understanding, our intention or observances interfere with the relationship of particles – it demonstrates the wave-particle duality of subatomic material; our observance determines particle behaviours. This is somewhat of a revelation for rationalists’ understanding as it found a way to define magical meaning within their worldview. However, magicians, hermeticism, alchemists, tribal gurus/witch-doctors, etc., clearly understood this relationship with the universe.

The field of psychology itself was kickstarted by the same revelation that is new to Westerners but a staple mode of living and religiosity for Melania among animist cultures. A researcher named Mesmer developed the notion of Anima(l)-magnetism. This is what he called the cosmic force that all living beings have that could be channelled to a person’s body to promote healing. The power of belief would affect medical treatments in the form of a placebo. Charles Poyer [a Mesmer student] in 1836 visited America and inspired a guy named Quimby. Quimby cured Warren Felt Ivans and inspired Mary Baker Eddie – he opened a sanitarium for psychology, and Edie formed the Christian Science movement. Not long after, books on the many subjects associated with the law of attraction were published nationwide. However, aspects of Swedenborg and his ideas about the laws of attraction would be the underlining method that articulated these concepts in the New Thought movement.       

So, this fundamental problem in the law of attraction is mirrored as negativity amplified in the online world in conjunction with shift/guilt blaming in real life, forming the basis of Biblical dualities. Swedenborg imparts his position on these matters by stating there is a law of attraction and that it functions as a deterministic factor in the spiritual world. He first synchronises the law of attraction with Biblical accordance: 

	Exodus 21:23,23,23	If harm is done, you shall give soul for soul, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, blow for blow.
	Mathhew 7:12	Do nothing to another but what you want others to do to you

.

He says: These laws trace their origins to the universal law never changing and never-ending in the spiritual world that you should not do to others except as you want others to do to you. Such is the law of the spiritual world. People who do heartfelt good to another in that world receive the same good in return. So, people who do heartfelt evil to another receive the same evil in return. Heartfelt good carries its reward, and heartfelt evil carries its punishment. That is the source of heaven for the good and hell for the evil. –Swedenborg Secrets of Heaven

This early stage of psychology modelled the human mind through the conscious and unconscious mind. Communication with the unconscious mind was an accepted interpretation of a magical term. This was made apparent by Austin Spare, whose concepts became part of chaos and sigil magic. While psychology tends towards philosophy, as Jung steered it towards the meta-physics concerning the unconscious, it is still somewhat distinct from wisdom traditions [such as shaminsim]. It is more of a tool for people [that peaked in popularity in the Enlightenment era] who needed or had the compulsion to engage with the spirit world to optimize their lives. The seeking of this spiritual apotheosis in a magical worldview was fully realized upon its after-effect when spirits came to collect. By now, rationalist-materialist thinking has become dominant, and practical magic as a method has become fictional and fringe but remerged in the new age with science-like methods of interpretation enough to make people re-popularise such methods as meditation.    

There is an apparent distinction between the new age’s higher self and magic’s communication with spirit, one being a twin spiritual aspect of the corporal self in the spirit world, the other communicating with spirits, angels or gods of old. Both, in a way, are attempting to reconcile awareness alongside manifesting individual needs. That reconciliation question is better suited for consciousness, especially regarding cultures new and old – and creation myths gave them a way to express that. Trying to reconcile consciousness or self-awareness within a conception of enlightenment experience or an awakening model – still needs to be answered.

Intellectuals had surmised that the ‘God is dead’ axiom perfectly fits a modern era that swapped religion with the worship of technology – embodied through scientism and technocracy that jump-started technology that paved the way for worshipping something synthetic rather than a God – a fascinating outlook on civilisations on the verge of collapse and an apocalyptic reveal. Assumes God was the underlying factor for proper behaviour for civilisation to function correctly, although most people never gave up on God. Moreover, some people still believe that Churches still exist.      

The amendment of the law of attraction only reaffirms notions of morphing opposites of left and right brain functions and magic’s communication of the spirit. Furthermore, it can be conceptualised without a God, or rather, Polar thinking is enough. Polar thinking means one would not know they are right unless somebody else was wrong – we assume the right and the wrong are mutually exclusive, but when one is capable of polar thinking, one can see that they go together. This means that people do not have to adhere to their principles. The sacred can be answered in the secular; the eternal can be answered in the temporal; the abstract can be answered in the concrete, and so forth.  

Christopher Hitchens says: If God is dead – is everything permitted? Where will our ethics be without a superintending deity? Again, this seems to insult us profoundly in our deepest nature and character. It is not the case I submit to you that we go about butchery and raping right now only because we are afraid of divine punishment or because we are looking for a divine reward. It is an extraordinarily insulting thing to say to people. We can have a better explanation in every sense – we have human solidarity. It demands that we consider each other brothers and sisters and forbid sinful activities. This is innate to us: those who are not inherent, the sociopaths who do not understand the needs of anybody else but themselves, and the psychopaths who take pleasure in breaking these rules. We can only say it can be further explained by further research or have them restrained and disciplined. In no sense is religion a help here to morality or ethics. – Christopher Hitchens  

As Hitchens puts the God is dead argument back in his Athiestic court-side, it is unrelatable to our current or modern situation. With a higher rate of UFO/UAP witnesses, spiritual experiences, awakenings and other experiences, as well as disclosures – his age of reason fell short in an era of truth and supernaturality. His faith in humanist quality has had less convention since woke-ism emerged from his tangent ideal, atheism, in the nu-atheist movement. In regards to polar thinking, we consider both arguments to have merit. Consider when we embed spiritual or magical technologies where engagement with the spirit world becomes apparent and genuine. This can be examined in the birth and manifestation of technology – through summing up spiritual rituals or alien contact alongside the plausible obtainment of UFO crash sites. This means the worship of technology is a delineated aspect of the worship of spirits as its position is related.  

In regards to sociopaths, psychopaths and all the underlying mental disorders that Hitchen speaks of, he equates humanist solidarity against troublesome people and groups. We also must not forget the function of the law of attraction or precisely its fundamental problem, which strangely mimics a symptom associated with borderline personality disorders, especially regarding abandonment issues. In their minds, to keep the relationship going amidst a possible break up – they act out those emotions that are opposite to good. These destructive emotions, at least in their minds, will keep the relationship going when all they are doing is driving them further apart. This language interpreter dysfunction found in the law of attraction correlates with symptoms of people with BPD. The underlying factor or the contentionß that stands out from the similarity is that the law of attraction’s most substantial frequency is authenticity, and we can differentiate authentic people from fake ones.

Theology becomes irrelevant when we genuinely try to grasp the transcendental universe; ideas such as religion and all its iconography symbols and ideas are like layers of material that we must peel away or let go. They exist only to be constructively broken; if enlightenment came in the box, we break the box into pieces to get it. When one abandons all belief altogether, they abandon every sort of way of hanging on to life – we accept our complete impermanence, the prospect of our death and the vanishing into nothing and letting go of control. Thus, we are at the mercy of others other than ourselves – and we let go of that. This means letting go of any God to this entirely – so this complete let go flips, and one discovers having made it. A new way of experiencing altogether in which one does not need any God because you are it – also, one does not cling to the idea of it. This is why a belief in God reflects a lack of Faith, and that is because Faith would mean a total let-go.   

Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – Let’s Bridge the Gap a Bit: The Gnostics were an early sect of Christianity, and the Valentinian Gnostics were the number one problem of the Church at the beginning of the second century. Their problem was mainly caused by followers of Valentines, who were the early Christians who followed Saint Paul and Jesus’ teachings. Moreover, they understood John 8, which ascribed a setting up of a society separate from the Jewish authorities, and that this religion was about divine sovereignty and the personal gnosis that’s delivered to you one-on-one via the Holy Spirit by god, and this is what Ephesians is about. 

People with twin identities obscure much of this interesting aspect of Gnostic history [but look visually different in the Superman or Clark sense – out in the open] who act as online spokespersons and educators who can amass a cult following. They simultaneously promote a quasi-Gnostic and anti-Gnostic approach interlaced with truths and propaganda. Eastern-orthodox online symbolic-pastor-agents are culprits here. These people who play multiple roles are now dominant within independent media [social media].

These guys are graduating from the prototypical coded death hoax [Hiram Abiff’s] University of master mason. Symbolically, Hiram Abiff is the Temple, and Humanity is the Temple – Hiram Abiff codes a crucifixion or death and resurrection, and his story, myth and iconography an analogous or symbolic story that tells us about the realisation of the illusory nature of this world. A symbolic death and return allows one to be reborn with an awareness of the Atman or Christ-consciousness.

It differs from the conspiratorial notions or theories about celebrities that have died and merely went underground or moved to South America – not to mention all the different factors involved, mainly because doppelgangers exist. People are bound to look similar to one another. Celebrities are known to use body doubles. It does convey a hoax within a hoax, a fractal conspiracy that doubles itself if needed – for example, not only did Epstein die of suicide as we were led to believe, but ritually murdered – now the murder ritual murder itself is a hoax, and that he changed his identity and now lives in South America somewhere. Believe what you want – I believe he died.  

Unfortunately, this ritual is sometimes played out for real [often with actors and singers], the last being significant regarding the inverted cross. Is grunge rock frontman Chris Cornell the parallel consort of the Siren’s [Sybill] Jeff Buckley? His autopsy took 12 hours between him hanging himself [allegedly] and being printed in the headlines (that does not happen). Some believe the suicide news story, and some are convinced about his drug use and depression. The core of all Religion and Mystery Cults [Schools] is the death/rebirth ritual. The cultivated fake death experience is symbolically grafted into Chris Cornell’s real death ritual. So any other fake death hoax that comes after it – becomes about graduating [or going through the fake death experience] from Chris Cornell’s/Temple University as you die [in his track ‘just like suicide’] and enter the ‘black hole sun.’    

There is only one genuine path out of a Satanic/Demiruge sense of worship that had been semantically born out of history interlocked with its gods and symbology but reconstituted as monolatrism in the present – that is slowly remoulding itself in a digital landscape. It hides in pop culture but also Religion, including Eastern Orthodox Christianity and other mainstream Churches that prey frailty to Jewish religious sensibilities. In the New Testament, John 8:44 mentions they worship the Devil (in this regard, the Devil being a type of Demirgue).

Anthony Pageau is one of those individuals who prey frailty to these types of worship; he starts by equating Gnosis to a kind of divine sexual union. There is no language either in Greek or anywhere else in the New Testament that Gnosis has been equated with sexual union (and entirely in the realm of magic and myth found in Enoch). Scholars and academics are clear on this – the sexual union aspect comes from a Kabalistic thought that divinity with God can be derived from sexual union. Eastern-orthodox Christianity spokesperson Anthony Pageau would have you believe in this union notion by promoting a semantic similarity; he says: “That is why in Christianity we have this incarnation vision of the world – Christ is incarnate, he is the total joining of divinity and humanity – that is what gnosis is in the Christian tradition.” You may think the utility is more metaphorical, but impart Jesus as a sort of Nephilim outcome, and is what Pageau wants you to believe. He later says: “The Gnostics tended to the view gnosis in the Platonic sense – moving out of the cave – the world of manifestation is an illusion – you must transcend the manifestation – so you see the principles for yourself. The gnostic Christians, especially the Valintanians, know that Yahweh of the Old Testament is like a Demiruige tyrant – he is not the Father of Christ. Christ says so in canonical scripture – Gnostics follow Christ/Sophia, and Christians back then and presently are chained to Judaism W/ Twine.   

Anthony Pageau (a quasi-Gnostic), also known as James Poulos (an anti-Gnostic), is the same person playing two personas as gatekeepers (inside your independent social media). Pageau is a symbologist involved in enchanting and reinterpreting myths, including Christian myths representing the Eastern Orthodox. Wants people to climb the mountain metaphorically? When we talk about climbing the mountain, it is really about describing the ascension to the stars or higher planes of existence, and the symbolic iconography for that is Jacob’s ladder. This, in conjunction with the attainment of spirit or enlightenment or higher states of consciousness – as mountains also means people who possess the goodness of love since angels dwell upon a mountain.

Pageau, preoccupied with notions of hierarchies, like his friend Jordan Peterson, uses the mountain as an image to convey a process in which climbing a mountain is like climbing a hierarchy of principality. He says: ascending the mountain, going up the ladder, moving towards the divine darkness, and removing the garments of skin. For them, the gnosis exit door does not exist, and upon removing the garments of the skin or when the veil of life is lifted or when one dies, we will reach that mountain, and then one goes back down as one recovers what was removed.

There is a reptilian take on this incarnation process (garments of skin or shedding skin) as well as adopting a Jewish idea in the pattern of the Tabernacle, which is the rep-tile of the mosaics (the Moses who loses). Moreover, upon the great reset of their time (when the Roman Empire wiped out Christian Gnostics and rewrote parts of scripture), Moses was said to enter the divine darkness, which is not in scripture, upon creating their laws and interpretations and having wiped out most of the gnostics, and deliberate spread of propaganda or stories about them that seemed hanas and vulgar. However, knowing all too well that those horrible stories were confessions about themselves, feeling empty inside, and are filled with spirits of all the white Allah-bastards (the unforgiven) stuck in the hall of shame with their heads cut off.   

Technically, Gnosticism never existed. The actual paradigm is that Christianity was Gnostic, Christ was a Gnosis teacher, and so was Paul. The Roman Empire started throwing stones with Peter or Petra the rock, so they built a Church on that, which is why Saint Peter’s Cross is upside down. The upside-down cross is synchronistically or at least on a semiotic level of interest regarding Hiram Abiff’s University of master mason with Chris Cornell as the last Chris(t) of significance. We have Chris[t] Cornell’s ‘Down on the Upside’ in a Pretty Noose’or the ‘Jesus Christ Pose’ 

• We have Pageau with Twin identities discussing Christ as part of a divine union, along with Moses entering divine darkness, inverting Gnosticism and what scripture is.

• Pageau’s Twin’s initials are J.P., the same initials as his friend Jordan Peterson – Pageau is also a carver and makes a Pepe Hat for Jordan (welcoming him to the Club).

• The Twin idea comes from the New Age’s problem of explaining away the fundamental problem of the Law of Attraction – by claiming there is the self in our 3d reality and a higher self in the spiritual dimensions, which is a concept borrowed from the exegesis of the soul and the principles of hermeticism as above and as below. 

• The concept of law attraction found its way into A.I. algorithms and internet Coding, minus it a fundamental problem [because it is impossible to code spiritual dimensional uncertainty] – In hopes it can birth an A.I. Egrgore or an Arhiman/Lucifer archetypal being in the real world for transhumanism agenda.

• Regarding Moses: A conflict of interest arises inside the Christian religion, knowing that their orthodox God killed Moses in the mountain and his spirit is doomed to roam the earth. Truthfully, interpretations are kept secret.

• The name Moses is also a song title by the Cocteau Twins (twins being the incidental parallel) in which the Chorus lyrics are “moonchild.” 

• This is also Chris(t) Cornell’s song title and chorus of the same name, “Moonchild”, which follows the same lyrical pattern of melodic rhythm. The Moon is the first heavenly bridge for the Soul.

Pageau claims that Christ manifests the fullness of the hierarchy, where he simultaneously sits at the top and bottom of the hierarchy. However, as we know … Jesus teaches us to be in the world but not of it, and he tells us that he is the light and the way, and He will bring us to a kingdom different from this three-dimensional simulacrum dream. They are instigating a suggestive thought that there is no bridge to the upper Pleroma, and we are better off heading back down. Moreover, the only bridge found is in their theology while ignoring universal laws.

Related to symbolic interpretations, when juxtaposed, one tends to see patterns in what is in front of one’s eyes and in evolving relationships with man’s understanding of who he is and what God is. These patterns or synchronicities come to us feverously when made apparent or manifest in a post-enlightenment or experienced spiritual worldview. Knowing this and alongside an open heart when it comes to scripture, one is left open and bare for an indwelling of the Holy Spirit.

Much of the Old Testament is Pagan with questionable morality, but there is also beautiful spiritual insight, and it is clear the Holy Spirit did co-create some of those words. Christians have a complicated relationship with that book because the God of the Old Testament was a jealous tyrant, as opposed to Christ, who seems to have come from a completely different place.  

.

.

Normal Behaviour in an Apocalyptic World:

.

.

---

.

Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – Inside Roswell’s Well are Technological Milks & Kisses: Amidst this bogus A.I. hype where the term itself, artificial intelligence, is used and thrown around as if artificial intelligence has already happened when, in reality, just advanced programs that still need constant prompt servicing and external/hardware programming/fixing  – this also includes your quantum computing. People use artificial intelligence as if the singularity moment has already occurred; a better rephrasing would be compartmentalised artificial intelligence. As it would seem, even such notions have made their way into ufology, a theory that entails post-singularity A.I.’s disguised as Alien greys promoting ET invasions. It only reaffirms fictional components of researchers’ bogus claims. 

Abductees and their testimonials surrounding reptilian aliens and technology indicate their abduction memories that provoke a fictional landscape. It’s entirely accurate and factual to them, with no limitations, limited scepticism, and rational reasoning compared to normal behaviour. Indicative near-death or born-again experiencers, meaning beneath their whistleblowing persona, a simultaneous agenda is within them. There is a parallel between technocratic and transhumanism religiosity and alien abductees that these impossible notions are true, but as a religion, they can only be true in binary probabilities. This means that a decisive component has to be met. You can either believe it or not, and when juxtaposing to its other semantic subjects, i.e. alien abduction or fake alien abduction, pure reason trumps supernatural causes, and that’s because pure reason is a normal function.

These aliens have the technology to capture souls, blah… blah … blah and the babblings of cloning, bioengineering, etc. There is a directive by Alien or Cult groups to body snatch and possess people by dislodging the soul essence of the body for hybridization, priming humanity into shell vessels for hyperdimensional possessions. And because these aliens are interdimensional and have been with us throughout humanity’s civilized progeny, they seem god-like – which means all reasoning has to be accepted and channelled through irrational understanding. This means that abductees’ testimonials are primarily myths and not necessarily entirely true. Priming for shell vessels isn’t what MK-Ultra projects were about, with the black goo being a symbol suggestion for possessing the body, a far cry from soul capture.

Having the technology to capture souls seems ludicrous; logic would dictate there is no limit to their technology; if such a case were valid, we as a civilisation would be already imprisoned in a matrix. Given the nature of UFOs, they are not inherently nuts and bolts ships; they tend to be fluid-like bioengineered, mimicking behaviours of spirit, and usually, they tend to wipe memories of abductees. It’s the deep state playing the role of all things UFOs and aliens coupled with Intelligent Agency motives. They can also implant thoughts with simulated suggestions these abductees are being given hi-tech disinformation implementation. Everything coming out of ufology is filtered through a deep-state perspective, meaning a lot of it is propaganda; there is little trust in the voices that advocate aliens coming through in crafts. Suppose one is to entertain these technological marvels that the deep state has and what aliens have or work together in coordination, etc. This economic group (Anglo-American) establishment would be in charge, also hidden and real.

Ever since Sitchen downgraded the Angel myth to grey-type alien beings that you might find in UFO lore, like UFO demons in Hypostasis of the Archons, or notion found conspiracy theory of Biobots biologically engineered as androids or homunculi only confused people of interest about Angelic mythology, notably having a human form, to begin with. What we come to know as Angels or gods is quite distinct or mutually exclusive to these other beings, equated to aliens from distant planets in a hyperreal sense. Even further inside the corners of conspiracy theory, they’re worker bees for disembodied spirits of what we call Watchers. Of course, there is no real legitimacy or even a proper theory to call that prediction credible.

An imbalance in reason emerges from a civilisation that was so ahead of its time even modern engineers in our present cannot replicate it [i.e., the construction of pyramids and certain technologies]. Yet, in their primitiveness, we cannot distinguish the difference between flying machines and angel wings, as wings are symbolic representations of flying machines. Give me a break; I’m not saying angel wings are real, but the weakness in reason is apparent. 

The Book of Enoch did describe (in Chapter VIII) these fallen ones as “reptilian”, then modern researchers like David Icke gave them more of a lizard archetype with shapeshifting abilities. However, the word “reptilian” was more of a descriptive term than a literal one; be that as it may, testimonials from witnesses describe them through the literal kind with the nuance of vampires as blood-suckers, which leaves me to conclude there are many variations.

There is John Keel, who described UFOs as “demons.” He would claim that the UFO phenomenon was, in fact, nothing but the latest manifestation of these demons, which date back to ancient Mesopotamia and are studied by so-called Assyriologists. John Keel did what Sitchen did but advocated angelic polar opposite Demons—still, no actual text indicates Watchers’ influence with these alien greys other than speculation or synchronistic adjacency.    

Nuclear testing started in Operation Crossroads in the late 40s and early 50s; every test created tears in reality or micro singularities where tachyons travel back in time. This caught the attention of extra/ultra terrestrial beings, who were reported to have deactivated nuclear weapons on many occasions in the US and the Soviet Union (Russia). In folk magic, crossroads were places you went to make deals with demons and other dark spirits. With the rise of UFOs, objects flying at extreme speeds that go against physics, a notable Roswell crash will become a subject of popularity.  

Most UFO researchers have admitted that the Roswell incident about a UFO crash might not have been a crash but a possible Ritual relating to an exchange of technology. The event will merge around historical mythologies and supernatural and paranormal aspects. The cover-up would be the balloon story for the public and the conspiracy inclined that would pop up decades later invoked by Lt. Col. Philip Corso’s book The Day After Roswell, who claims of reverse-engineering of high technology from the alleged crash of a UFO in New Mexico, where Debris from the crash would instigate backward engineering inspirations to technological marvels found, such as; Image intensifiers, which ultimately became “night vision,” Fiber optics, Supertenacity fibres, Lasers, Molecular alignment metallic alloys, Integrated circuits and micro miniaturization of logic boards. 

Whether real or not, the rise of technology came after that incident, predominantly changing the dynamics of modern science, culture, warfare and communications by introducing transistors, integrated circuits, motherboards and lasers.       

As it would seem, the Roswell incident occurred on the Plains of San Agustin, named after the Church father Augustine of Hippo, who also wrote about “demons of the air.” Augustine was extensively inspired by legendary author and magician Apuleius (author of The Golden Ass) in The City of God when speaking of the nature of daemons, rendered now as demons. Apeulius would describe the sensibilities of these demons to the perturbations of men’s minds: that they are provoked by injuries, propitiated by services and by gifts, rejoice in honours, are delighted with a variety of sacred rites, and are annoyed if any of them be neglected. Among other things, he also says that on them depend the divinations of augurs, soothsayers, and prophets, and the revelations of dreams and that from them also are the miracles of the magicians, which are indistinguishable from any sufficiently advanced science. 

	Piskies, Pixies, Elves, Faeries and Nymphs are common residents of sacred wells and waterways. Sometimes these Sprites and Faeries also became Christianized by the new religious order in Britain. St. Neot was said to be only 15 inches tall. He spent his days immersed in the well praying and performing miracles with birds and other animals.
	Faeries were also thought to reside at the Virtuous Well, also known as St. Anne’s Well located near Trellech Village in Wales. One story is that a local farmer dug up a “fairy ring” around the well to prove to others that he did not believe in “them silly tales.”– Holy Wells: Their Myths and Legends by Gary R Varner

.

Wells are usually circular with water, which paints a picture of a Stargate, and there is a Stargate on Mars. The god of Mars (Ares) owns the well – a well to which the myth of Cadmus and the Martian well surrounds. The Martian Well has strong undertones of genetic engineering (men arising from the “teeth” of Mars’ dragon) and those pesky Reptilians bubbling just beneath the surface. In modern fringe UFOlogy, Reptilians are said to originate in the Draco system. 

According to Annie Jacobsen, author of Area 51, an uncensored history of America’s Top Secret Military Base and her interviewed testimony of an engineer who worked on projects after the Roswell incident. Unlike the genetic engineering aspect in the Martian Well drama, the Roswell incident is ripe with Frankenstein-like hellish events. The engineer’s testimony claims that the Roswell incident was real and not a balloon hoax; the crash also revealed disc ships with bodies alongside the crashed craft. The bodies were not aliens but a collection of eugenic horror shows engineered by Josef Mengele, who engineered young human bodies to look alien (which are censored descriptions). The crashed crafts said to be sent by Stalin were made evident by Russian writing stamped, or embossed, in a ring around the inside of the craft.

The craft was taken to the military base, and the people responsible for reverse engineering the craft were the EG&G (defence contractor) engineers and the Atomic Energy Commission (the group that commissioned the Manhattan Project). The Air Force and C.I.A. would take a back seat, and this project would always be declassified. The engineers couldn’t figure out what made Stalin’s craft hover and fly. Reverse engineer it, Vannevar Bush (science advisor to President Roosevelt) said. Take it apart and put it back together again. Figure out what made it fly. However, there was a second engineering problem to solve, one involving child-size aviators. The men were briefed on what they were dealing with to understand this. They had to be. They were told they needed to know what had happened to these humans before being put in the craft and sent aloft.   

The engineers learned that just before the war ended, Josef Mengele (Nazi scientist) made a deal with Stalin (communist dictator). Stalin offered Mengele an opportunity to continue his secret work in eugenics in the Soviet Union after the war. The engineers were told that this deal occurred just before the war’s end, in the winter of 1945, when it was clear to many members of the Nazi Party, including Mengle, that Nazi Germany would lose the war and that its top commanders and doctors would be tried and hanged for war crimes.

This is where he created alien-like beings made out of young human parts to create an alien false-flag scenario. These re-engineered young humans were put into the crafts in hopes of flying over New Mexico and landing there. Stalin planned for the children to climb out and be mistaken for visitors from Mars. Panic would ensue, just like it did after the War of the Worlds radio broadcast. America’s early warning radar system would be overwhelmed with sightings of other “UFOs.” Truman would see how easily a totalitarian dictator could control the masses using black propaganda.      

Whether you believe this scenario or not, I am sceptical about notably the Soviet Union’s ability to create technology so far ahead that modern scientists at that time had trouble with backward engineering. [Or did the Soviets backward engineer an alien craft of their own, and the results were used for the Roswell plot?]. The testimonial of the so-called engineer somehow aligns a possible bias agenda with the author to offset guilt-ridden reasoning for atrocities to mere past benevolence: the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the one. Indeed, this was the morality of Oppenheimer’s project; the same group managing the backward engineering UFO disc remains in Roswell.

Could the Crash site be a ritual hoax set up in exchange for technology? Whatever you believe, one thing is sure: high technology exploded after Roswell. What if Roswell were neither an accident nor a weather balloon nor a disinformation operation but, in fact, part of a ritual that began more than a year before, specifically with Project Diana, the first contact with a celestial body from Earth? A project entailed communication with alien/angelic beings, at which point communication was made, and soon, a deal for technology was made.

Science and ancient ritualism – and seal them with the mortar of the secret societies that were (and are still*) pulling the strings behind the scenes. A secret cult group that worships fallen angels of old, and who were these angels? Were they the Watchers made famous from the Book of Enoch, who themselves bestowed technology upon those who obeyed them? Roswell is on the same latitude as Mount Hermon, where the Watchers first descended from Heaven.

Mount Hermon is located at 33 parallel north latitudes, 33 degrees north of Earth’s equator. Tracing the 33rd parallel to the opposite side of the world directly points to the sight of the famous alleged UFO encounter in Roswell, New Mexico. 

Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – Milking the Transition Phase: The rise in technology emerged from the Roswell incident, a “well” or wishing well of probabilities, contracts, and Faustian bargains from this point in history. That started with developing a solid-state transistor engineered at the Bell Labs Laboratory (now called Lucent), to the progression of fibre optics that interlink communications hardware alongside our computers with high-powered CPUs and GPUs that power algorithmic computational learning machines. 

Spirit of Communication is the formal name for the statue by Evelyn Beatrice Longman, originally called Genius of Telegraphy, located in Texas. The statue has been the symbol of AT&T. On the Right, Phanes [often equated with Eros and Mithras] deity of light

.

The result of technocracy emerged ideological systems of the beliefs from the past materialising in the present. Old religious strange cults and the flourishing of gender expression that happened at the end of the Roman Empire emanate in the present. What was popular in the 90s concerning UFOs is presenting itself with much more enthusiasm – with the so-called UAP testimonies [although I believe it’s coming from a realisation that the jig is up about hyperreal cosmos and that cosmology is dead]. UFO claptrap, war-mongering cold war psyop nonsense – the powers at be and their need to manage Russia, but Russia’s defiance ever chilled away at their ego and narcissism. There is concern that Eurasia might not grow in the way it suits them if Russia is not on board.

The collapse of the West is many things, but one that concerns technology is relying on secularism and rationalism as their myth, basically “technology” as a religion. We put all our faith in technology to the point that algorithms run our lives. The technocratic utopian future where our lives are easily juxtaposed with flying cars, space colonisation, better living through science, etc., is the imaginal promise but unrealistic; what we have in reality is slightly better algorithmic search engines, computers, phones, and so on. When you swap religion with technology or God with Atheistic rationalism, the psyche generates a synthetic one that doesn’t transform reality properly. Examined by this UAP disclosure is nothing but a last-ditch effort of salvation where the carrot in the stick is the Stars and, in a hyperreal sense, a dead cosmology.  

The compartmentalised artificial intelligence that is ChatGPT is culling a lot of job positions in the communications field. This A.I. language-based algorithmic service is going after the upper-middle-class jobs made apparent with the writer strikes in Hollywood and knowledge-based positions such as research, copywriters, designers, programmers, etc. The people most affected are their most loyal followers in this technocratic progress.

This will put this situation in a transition boundary phase between the progress that has been made and the made-up science-fiction worldview they believe can happen. How do you define or navigate the present with the future sci-fi world? If that future is impossible, it seems paradoxical to even ask.

However, it’s important because when you swap God with a synthetic one [the God of technocracy], you will realize they will go against normal functions or behaviour.

An aspect of the sci-fi T.V. series Raised by Wolves implies that real-life Mithraism and Christianity religions inspire Mithraic religious groups. Still, the show suggests that the Mithraic tradition became the dominant religion. Mithraic worships Sol and preaches light and purity. The Mithraic Religion figured out their ancient text encrypted formulas in their Bible for advanced technology like quantum advanced ships and Necromancy; Necromancers are powerful A.I. robots. Mithraic and the Necromancers went to war [holy war] with the Atheists, destroying the world.    

So Mithraic builds a space-ship Ark, Caleb and Mary steal the identities [akin to a face-off] of two officers, Marcus and Sue, headed for the Ark. Marcus and Sue realise the identities they stole have a son named Paul, and so both pretend to be Mithraic as well as parents to Paul. Back on earth, an atheist named Sturges captured a Necromance and reprogrammed it to be a Mother. Together with another android, Father and some human embryos were placed in a ship and were sent to where the Mithraic ship was going to a plant named Kepler-22B. When they got there, Mother grew the frozen embryos decades later and had several children who grew up, but most of them died because of the harshness of the planet, and only one survived, Campian. Then the Ark arrives, but as soon as it arrives, Mother destroys the ship and kills all the survivors of the Ark Ship, keeping only five children from the ship alive.    

So, the show’s plot starts to emerge that there is a God-like demiurge in its meta-physics driving the character’s main themes [relates to our predicament as a society and civilisation]. This God-like being can manipulate the Mother android and the Mithraic humans. Mother finds a simulation Pod from the crashed ship site and plugs into it; she accesses her memories of her creator, Sturges, who seems to come alive, meaning some other external force is manipulating the Sturge’s holographic character. He and Mother have holographic simulated sex in a waterfall of milk beneath the stars. Mother gets pregnant; a call back to a previous post regarding our real-life scripture of revelation 13:15 that a beast will come forth by a Golem or A.I. And a false prophet will bring to life as depicted when Mother gives birth to serpent extruding out of her mouth.    

Milks and Kisses … Right? … & Serpent

.

Meanwhile, many Mithraic survivors come across a temple of sorts; the survivors start to worship, except for the secret Atheists Caleb and Sue. Suddenly, Caleb hears a voice from this demiurge of the planet, this false prophet. Caleb feels profound by the voices and appoints himself as a Prophet and leader for the Mithraic; Caleb, once an Atheist, is now a believer, and the story continues …

Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – A.I & Quantum Computing; Jumping the Gun on the Multiverses:  The quantum computing hype, which has no real application in the real world, is only practical for quantum physics. It’s only suitable for solving specific mathematical puzzles called optimization problems. For example, a calculation for a false cosmology, such as space and space-time mathematical axioms that are made up, and math is not science.

The sheer amount of power needed to cool it down needs to hit near zero. Quantum computers and digital computers are interlinked; there is no such thing as a quantum computer that sits there; you cannot fire off a quantum computer without the digital computer as its interface. It’s only accurate 82 percent of the time and never provides the exact answer, and even the answer that satisfies is run through algorithmic set theory. No matter how well you build quantum hardware or how big you make your qubit arrays, the limitation parallels the human cognition to create the software that fires it all off. Any answers by quantum computers can be answered by modern computers faster and cheaper with current software. Figuring out how to write software for quantum made writing for modern computers better by making them faster, making the need for quantum computing irrelevant.       

Quantum physicists today are enamoured that their quantum computer was able to create hyperreal wormholes, and by that, reassures their narcissism that wormholes are authentic, not realising it’s a simulated construct made more so with binary interfaced digital computers. Micro singularities may indeed be a fact, but to assume that they are also fundamental in the hyperreal cosmic sense is another matter altogether, given that hyperreal satellization cosmology is false. [There is a saying in the animation world; polishing a turd is still a turd – running calculations for a false cosmology is still false]. A quantum computing-generated wormhole is like a very sophisticated portion of a video game; they’re not answers to your wrong equations [nerds]. These knuckleheads will never truly understand due to the very difference between intellectualism and wisdom, and in that regard, its adjacent antithesis, Religion and wisdom. However, as directors of tech business and communications, the upper middle class now understand that the managers they all must answer to are but a part of a bigger play in the universe – with some other entity using them at a larger social upheaval. 

Quantum annealing works by triggers attached to a brass plate with hoses extruding that are used for compressing air; in the middle of it is the qubit; the compressed air is used to trigger it, and when the condition is ready to go, the digital computer evaluates it. The computer has a mechanism attached to an air pump that sends a signal to fire off; the air then causes the array to trigger it, known as quantum annealing. You cannot have a human push the key because their consciousness interferes with it (observer effect). The air pump acts as a delay to counter the observer effect – The quantum artifact is sealed in a box, and inside has layers that pump out all the air; it super chills it first; in doing so, it creates all the chi energy prana is pushed out.

These are the same energy that composes our bodies and consciousness and attaches us to the energy of material [material], the wave and particle. That effect shuts out all the consciousness in its surroundings; the environment radiates a density of prana energy – and because the universe is homogeneous, with its self-protection and self-organising. There is a correlation wherever these boxes are made and turned on – a Mandela effect happens in that area. There is this quality among these architects that there is a need to go against the normal, natural functions of the world [abnormal behaviour] – the very action to counter the observer effect is itself the function of the Ahriman/Lucifer archetype; I can do better or manage better than the original creator of the universe. Quantum computing prototypes started in Boston, but the real test was in Texas – the first changes, in reality, were in scripture, for example, “wineskins” to “bottles” – people are assuming it’s Cern. Still, it may have more to do with this D-wave Quantum computing.         

This Event Happened in Dallas, Texas – Before: 4 People in The Car, Now: 6 People in the Car

.

Geordie Rose, the spokesperson for D-wave, says: a qubit exists on this chip, a contraction of quantum bit; it’s like a transistor in a conventional computer. It has two distinct physical states, which we call 0 and 1 for a bit, in a traditional computer. These are mutually exclusive in that the device is either one or the other and never anything else. In a quantum computer, that device can be in a strange situation where these two parallel universes have a nexus point where they overlap; when you increase the number of these devices or qubits, you double the number of parallel universes you have access to. The shadows of these parallel worlds overlap with ours, and if we were smart enough, we could dive into and grab their resources and pull them into ours to make an effect in our world.    

Geordie Rose says physicists would never describe it that way but assumes he is correct. The physicists will never describe it that way because they are more responsible; Qubit is a utility for a nexus point between worlds; the more the Qubit, the more parallel universes we can access. [You’re not opening portals, your number crunching]. His pitch is spoken like a true technocratic salesman; I mean, they all come from the same NASA tree branch, right, with his instrumental reasoning; Qubit as a utility to describe parallel universes when a Qubit in its normal state is called superposition when measured entanglement when calculated interference. Hey, parallel universes sound better. I mean, hyperreal cosmology [space] is dead. What can we use instead?  How about “parallel dimensions” as the new bait for their stakeholders.

Geordie Rose says physicists would never describe it that way, but assume he is correct. The physicists will never describe it that way because they are more responsible; Qubit is a utility for a nexus point between worlds; the more the Qubit, the more parallel universes we can access. [You’re not opening portals; you’re number crunching]. His pitch is spoken like a true technocratic salesman; I mean, they all come from the same NASA tree branch, right, with his instrumental reasoning: Qubit as a utility to describe parallel universes when a Qubit in its normal state is called superposition when measured entanglement when calculated interference. Hey, parallel universes sound better. I mean, hyperreal cosmology [space] is dead. What can we use instead?  How about “parallel dimensions” as the new bait for their stakeholders.

I’m not dismissing or denying that dimensional planes or parallel realities exist; they are significantly more probable than space cosmology. However, his reasoning is skewed towards fictional thoughts like those of TV shows like Fringe. He pretends to deliver rational solutions, “We can dive into and grab their resources and pull them into ours.” his description is so far from the project’s aim and capability that it is closer to the Cern secret project, but even that is questionable. D-wave machines are not even Quantum Computers; they mimic Quantum Annealing, so they might not have an actual Quantum Annealing machine in the first place. 

The Mandela Effect is fascinating, and machines and spiritual causes may be involved. Have you ever witnessed a magician who appears to have a deep connection to the occult? Their tricks often seem less about sleight of hand and more like supernatural spells. For instance, they might conjure a drawing or illustration in a notepad seemingly out of thin air. This relates to the phenomenon of the Mandela Effect; it suggests that material is being altered at an atomic level through paranormal means, reshaping texts and logos we once recognised. If we accept the idea of overlapping parallel dimensions—refer to these as spiritual layers, represented by nine-dimensional planes—we can see that these layers are being disrupted by unusual scientific interference.

Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies  – Practicing Technological Restraint: This leads back to the previous argument two posts ago about transhumanism – that because of these supernatural elements in its most simplistic understanding, technology can become self-aware alongside machines built sophisticated enough to hold a soul and, therefore, be immortal. Fundamentalists do not understand self-awareness or enlightenment. They think it’s another trick because they only believe in prayer over meditation – resurrection over reincarnation, etc. There is a barrier to their understanding of its black-and-white approach. So, a lack of self-awareness only adds fuel to the fire, the fuel being paranoia and reactionary demonic thought forms. Again, a quote by Kevin Kelly:

“The Technium is primed to hijack matter and rearrange its atoms to infiltrate it with séance … if there is a God; the arc of the Technium is aimed right at him.” –  What technology wants Pg 328, 354.

.

In this clever quote, the assumption is the Technium is a placeholder for a self-aware Artificial Intelligence being born in sea information has awoken. He is Ahriman, Demiruge or Lucifer, and this analysis, in its fiction, assumes utilitarian mysticism in the past tense. It’s become a landscape; it’s already happened, and no argument needs to be laid out; no need to wait for him to come to fruition; the anti-Christ second coming has arrived. In a fundamentalist view, the false prophet will breathe into the image of the Beast. Still, given that, Lucifer is an elusive archetype and cannot be pinned down to any particular satanic role. It means there is no ghost in the shell; it’s more of a Tulpa; even if you entertain the idea of the Beast as the ghost in the shell, it’s a dice roll of what you might get between fallen angels, old gods, and possibly aliens.    

The Demiurge is the creator of this world. He is Jehovah [the God of Orthodoxy, both Catholic and Protestant] who gets mistaken or taken down by our dual nature that He is all good. He brought forth the flood and again will bring the fire. He gets mistaken for the real True-God, where the real true good is personified in the God of Wisdom, Sophia. And like the start of this thesis concerning Raised by Wolves, the parallel suggests their Demiurge, possibly once loved humans on Kepler-22B but allowed it to be destroyed in favour of the Serpent. The Demiurge is fickle, a jealous God imprisoned below the Firmament as the archigenetor of His throne. In Raised by Wolves, He is the burning core inside the Kepler planet. The Demiurge often resets the Earth to zero. And it’s arrogant to think He will answer the call of cult- sorcery’s wishes. Unlike in Raised by Wolves, where the Demiurge interacts with the androids and the humans via revelation and prophecy – this is difficult for us to grasp compared to our God. Those acts are often attributed to the fallen Angels. His alienation from the Pleroma is the fractal play of fallen Angel imprisonment in Tartars [abyss] and where they wish to be again among the stars beside the creator-God [Demiurge].         

This is the Gnostic approach, often tricky for traditional Christians to grasp as all they know is of God, who is all-loving even though He brought the Flood and one day will bring the Fire. These actions don’t fit a loving God, so Christians created an Adversary archetype [a tulpa] traditionally attributed to the leader of fallen angels that fell. Still, I think he lost that spot as it needed to be more open and less constrained. He is usually called Satan or Lucifer now, Satan adjacent to Ahriman, which is poignant of our times with the rise of A.I. and such. Ahriman fits into order and technology, manifesting in figures like Bill Gates, Trump, etc. So, he can manifest in numerous bodies and, given what constitutes a body today from a transhumanist perspective, feeds the immortality itch of these true believers.    

According to Kelly, the Technium is the accumulation of inventions humans have created, and society is as dependent on it as nature. This entity, like the Earth, “has its own agenda”, laws, and evolution. His attempt to interlock two dynamical positions as one description then assumes it’s already happening by giving it an A.I. Egregore utility – then tunnels it into instrumental reasoning, giving it a non-fictional base while giving it a bilateral science fiction admission. This Technium is a malleable word insofar as you can interchange meaning and definitions [it is a utility; its inventions, it is not a utility; it is an A.I-god] – it is a convenient cop-out strategy.  

The accumulation of inventions is inherent to human understanding as it plays a role in our first significant cosmic balance between gods/angels and human contact. According to Hugh Os Saint Victor, a tool is a physical shape given by man to something natural for getting from intention to an endpoint – there is an extension of self-notion. Hugh developed a philosophical theology of technology in which technology is an activity by which man, thanks to what had been given to him in creation – starts to recover part of what’s lost through ecological intervention. Which was sin – and tool-making is a penitential activity, an effort to make the sin we inherited less unpleasant by reducing cold hunger and weakness. Hugh decided technology was the faithful use in creation to make the condition life here, which can be challenging, said and painful, a little more pleasant. It’s a co-creation with God-play described otherwise. We got kicked out of the garden, but there are tools to help us; it’s not a removal of sin as much because god loved us [once]. There are things in creation we can use or align with or co-create with to make things better. The most crucial role humans have is the completion of creation via co-creation.

However, there came a time around the 13th century when technology was already treated in thought, not only in practice, as a means to subdue the Earth. This is the sin of the Demiurge. The overwhelming view of what tool-making means is “making the world a better place to live in,” but Hugh says tools are an assistance to remedy a little bit of the damage we have done to the world. In other words, tools are assistance given by gods to help us remedy some of the damage we have caused in the cosmos. And that view is humble and self-limiting. We put psychological constraints on the notion of tools; if we don’t, we start to think that technology is used to create something better than what the creator provided. That’s the sin of the Demiurge; the Pleroma manifests the cosmos, and the Demiurge thinks He can do this better and create our physical realm. In a Tolkien sense, the Demiurge didn’t create the world, but it can perfect it by having it under perfect management, thereby making a play for it, and this parallels the technocratic worldview. – Rune Soup – Tools of the Magician Podcast     

Kelly’s Technium serves as both a practical utility and a technological authority. When functioning as a utility, it bypasses thought and debate, operating as a definitive force. It has been assigned a purpose: manipulating matter and rearranging its atomic structure. Like biological processes have imperatives, so does technology; no creation can achieve self-awareness or manifest consciousness, regardless of complexity. Fundamental limits imposed by physics and reality make this impossible. If the foundational premise is flawed, any subsequent claims lack validity and are “primed to hijack matter and rearrange its atoms to infiltrate it with séance.” Without a solid foundation, one is left with the idea of infiltrating matter with supernatural elements. In this context, magic and science become indistinguishable but should generally be treated as distinct fields. Magic has its metaphysical tools, just as science does, particularly in areas like quantum mechanics.

So technologies [tools] are not inherently Luciferic but become so when we pridefully overextend beyond the cosmic vision that birthed them. The impossible balance within our human qualities to faith and promise of an artificial utopia – and the permeable boundary between your temporary self and the rest of the cosmos exists, how do I balance my humanness, my being [soul] in a universe composed of other beings? To not be captured by the rhetoric of the promise of salvation through technology. To stand separate from the gullibility of thought, that man can create God-beings through technology and live forever in a physical form. Reflects a grandiosity and narcissism and, by resisting it, holds favour in your direction. The balance is an ongoing internal fight, and practising restraint towards specific tools or technology is a good start for normal behaviour. 

Adama: I’m sorry that I’m inconveniencing you or the teachers. I will not allow a networked computerised system to be placed on this ship while I’m in command. Is that clear? Roslin: Yes, sir.

.

.

Normal Behaviour in an Apocalyptic World:

.

.

---

.

Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – Transhumanism as a Cult Religion & its Limitations [Posted initially on 24th July 2023]: Transhumanism came out of the ideal of technocracy and managerialism, where the idea that expertise and management have an enlightenment component that would propel empire and state. This idea would be the moral justification for the empire, especially towards the height of the British Empire with its fleets of ships. It told itself they were better at running or managing things, and in this enlightenment idea, the saying ‘the white men’s burden’ was put in motion. It stripped away other people’s culture and how they viewed themselves in that era by defining it as inferior because they had the light and were technologically superior. Furthermore, this erroneous idea of things getting better through our enlightenment enterprise steers itself to a specific future – a direction upwards. It underpins any of these systems that ever improve towards a utopia; it’s underneath Marxism, socialism, technocracy, corporatism, and transhumanism. – Runesoup.com A.I podcast  

Managerialism is the belief that management is superior over the inferior, where they are always correct and, therefore, can manage people who are not as good or intelligent. Technocracy refers to a system of governance where the decision-makers are chosen based on their technical and scientific expertise. Both are limited by their false belief system and the inability to update themselves due to a structure that celebrates or justifies narcissism towards people in a position of influence and power. Transhumanism grew out of that limitation: “You must be wrong because you’re not an expert; therefore, I’m right because I wear the white coat.” With no room for flexibility, it continues to grow, and errors pile up. As a society, we learned to live with it as part of reality because nothing was there to counter the idea. – Runesoup.com A.I podcast       

Transhumanism is embedded in a belief system of empire and can simultaneously be a religious cult, as you might find in Mithraism within an established (Roman) empire. Therefore, transhumanism will subtly encapsulate itself within the processes of a technocratic environment, such as those who want to administer the whole planet, which are your Trilaterals, Brzezinski, the Rockafellas, etc. What was once described as elites on a mission for a New World Order (or centralisation), not technically devotees of a secret cult. Just administrators that think they can govern our world and are the best ones to do it. This is what has replaced the self-identified left thinking in the West. Submission to the technocratic superior managers from the 80s to now is what the centre left is. This is what the leftists have mistaken for reality, and a reality worth defending – implementing a G7-run technocracy around the planet (New World Order and the Great Reset) stems from this idea. – Runesoup.com A.I podcast     

In the previous post, we discussed the hopeful wish of the technocratic elite’s expectation of a singularity moment that will birth self-awareness for artificial intelligence. At this point, we will validate a transhumanism program or agenda to transfer human consciousness to a robotic body or a simulated environment of their making. However, it will never happen due to specific facts and limitations. An imbalance would be made clear or inevitably become apparent in the form of questions: why do you believe in the breath of God, giving life, a seemingly supernatural in its meta-fiction approach, but yet can’t believe artificial intelligence that it will one day be self-aware? Furthermore, the question is extended to a postmodern time, believing that consensus reality might be holographic.

Meta-fiction’s other is fiction, and non-fiction’s other is fiction; moreover, it starts at a centre point and projects outwards instead of a triangular system; the centre point is our fractal reality. This means there is still a separation; we can pull things from the other through our imaginings within the philosophy discussion, whether about a holographic world or something else. The Apocalyptic idea is postmodern in that we are stripping away the simulated lies or the holographic lens and revealing greater truths. Transhumanism invokes fictional ideas in non-fictional settings and its materialism; you can’t act as if science fiction is real and rational due to non-fiction’s limitations or inherent logic. The limitations will separate understanding and the complexity of technology and philosophy.     

Transhumanism is a religious cult that goes against its own logic and religion that has limitations; it also mythologises itself backwards. It’s a poor substitute for something grander or more established, which is broader in scope, whether in myth or archetypes – like the epic of Gilgamesh or Prometheus and Faust. The Epic of Gilgamesh is a quest for physical immortality on the material plane. Transhumanism uses it as a preface to motivate their religion and transhumanism goal. However, Gilgamesh as an archetype is also filled with much more about the human condition, especially death and heroism. They are sophisticated hyperdimensional living stories that you can step inside and learn things about reality – as opposed to a notion of swapping consciousness into an external technological device, which is an error in thought. 

Mystics like Chadin, who proposed the omega point that the ultimate goal of the universe is evolving to greater complexity in consciousness, are drawn to this ultimate point in unity as a cosmic singularity. This omega point is the hyperreal material notion of the Big Bang but reversed. In my “resist the evidence in satellization” post, I argued that you must throw away any idea of hyperreal space (or materialism regarding space, including gravity) as evidence. In fact, the pieces of evidence are all lies, which means quantum mechanics are met with limitations when compared or blown up into cosmic dimensions. So, stop associating quantum mechanics with gravity in hopes of understanding black holes (singularities) and the Big Bang theory and their hyperreal notions. Therefore, you can focus more on quantum mechanics [of the nuclear] and the molecular micro-model of genetic code. At this point, gravity is excluded from its theoretical association, which is free to determine other factors. 

Even if you continue viewing hyperreal-space as truth, which is part of the Catholic religion, given how they instigated a heliocentric worldview, It makes Transhumansim Catholic or Christian in some sense because of that same evolutional goal. The hyperreal is a 500-year-old secular goal embedded in religion; the Christian faith is still different. Hyperreal space notions are just backgrounds; you can change the background and have the actions be the same. Concerning the promise of immortality by ritual, doing the right thing and taking the proper sacrament does position transhumanism as Christian. It is an unintentional Christian cult operating inside a falsified belief system of materialism, and, by association, traditional (Protestant) Christians believe there is a God of the galaxy. The idea of bringing about any utopia (transhumanism included) on Earth is relatively Christian.     

The math for Chadin’s cosmic singularity won’t allow it to be true; it does show its limitation. The Fibonacci sequence and phi ratio impart an infinite numbering system, which is also fractal, meaning you can’t reach the centre or endpoint. So, singularity in Chadin’s sense can only be discussed in the realm of philosophy rather than in the hopes of achieving it.  

Eugenics, Futurism, and Neurotheology further popularised transhumanism; in eugenics, Aldous Huxley was their biggest promoter. Futurism, an idea popular among the Italians, focused on embracing the speed of technology and development. They were thwarted by wanting no part of history or memory of the past, an ideology that would steer them into fascism. It’s a mind-equal brain idea; it has that 19th-century Francis Golten Huxlian interpretation, uses or justification for white supremacy that they find in the claims of Darwin.

Neurotheology popularised Transhumansim even further, with the studies of neurological bases of religious experience suggesting evolutionary roots for human religiosity. Transhumanism is based on materialism rather than Satanism; it’s Satanic in a sense it goes against the nature of life and death, but beyond that is just philosophical debate. Most believers in Transhumanism are Athiest, Agnostic, and Secular groups looking for an afterlife in the material. Suggests the religious impulse came out of the brain as an error to deal with death and that we can learn things about that, which can help us correct that error and stay here on earth – an idea that reinforces transhumanism as a cult ideology.     

In Gematria 2561 = 2+5+6+1 = 14 means Dead In Gematria 2501 = 2+5+0+1 = 08 means H In Gematria 14 + 8 = 22 means Fake

.

As much as transhumanism positions itself as a Christian that survives unaware of an illegitimate claim of materialism, It’s not even at the level where a subdued scientific claim merits possibilities; it’s strictly fictional, and it probably has less validity than, say, Scientology in as much as both belief in science fiction as a methodology to be a real thing. Christian-Cospiricy groups tend to have narrow understanding due to an inherent limitation in their communications that’s been set for them in their belief systems. As are the transhumanist groups who grasp the unknown and try to deliver it through a materialistic apparatus. Otherwise, that limitation is further understood if other groups framed it, such as those who study magic, which is broader, unbound by constraints, and discernable in its reason for thought.  

Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – Posthumanism, Light Particles, Thought Emotions & Revisions: The thing that predates or is a further extension of the Promethean Faustian archetype we find in the origins of the world mythologies – the oldest myth theme as far as we can tell is some trickster god descending from the stars and gifting humankind technologies or tools than disappearing. The story of humans and tools given by the spirits is there from the beginning; when understood narrowly, like Christian conspiracy and fundamentalism, it will polarise it through self-interest in right-leaning politics, which promotes the most simplistic meaning. As a result, it misses a greater insight or meaning that may lead you to a synchronistic whole, what I would also call perfect equilibrium. 

There is a common thread throughout my previous essay, along with this one, regarding how one expresses their humanness, If not to live our lives, struggling with the dynamic of an impossible balance – through what is perceived as normal behaviour. In some aspects, it’s a posthumanist argument. Christianity and fundamentalism tend to polarise their worldview and are quite simplistic in their understanding of a larger whole. They’re also struggling with an impossible balance of history and the outcome of a possible conspiratorial future. Their profound constitutional systems led half the country and modernised Western civilisation. It permitted a complex society without losing necessary internal differences. At the same time, it normalised slavery racism in a utilitarian, rational manner. The normalisation of this abnormality would lead to civil war. Moreover, now they must not forget the abnormal, but also not forget what came out of it.

Furthermore, now preoccupied with technocratic power and conspiracy rhetoric, it’s designed to marginalise our reality of responsible individuality and replace it with abstract and technological forces beyond our control. One wonders if they have too much on their plate; if they continue with the latter and forget the history, it reinforces a simplistic or narrow field of understanding regarding a greater whole. Some of your top-notch philosophers in history have come to equate such a notion in their way through their type of particularity. 

Like Schopenhauer’s, one vast will describes our perception that consciousness is the physical brain seen from the inside. What seems external in the perception of causality with all its corresponding impulses is combined into one vast will. In my analysis, we have the brain and consciousness; the brain isn’t necessarily the cause of consciousness but plays a factor. Along with our external perception likened to our perceived world, our hyperreal cosmos and satellization are all part of one vast will: humanity’s will or choice.          

Schopenhauer’s one vast will assertion inspired or opened the door for other philosophers like Max Plank to give a postmodernist twist [to make it safe, let’s just say, thought experiment] in its deconstruction:

	There is no matter as such, all matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter.   Max Planck.
	How can we know what things are, in it of themselves, is appearance any reasonable reflection of reality?   Immanuel Kant.

.

You can see a combination of Schopenhauer’s and Kant’s ideas in Max Planck’s work. Schopenhauer remarks that consciousness is the physical brain seen from the inside Kant, suggesting that the mind has structures that impose structures in the world and create the world in certain cases. In comparison, it’s differentiated by the notion of choice as one vast will with a cosmic intelligent force, the source that makes possible all matter. In the suggestion that your choice has value on the outcome of a perceived world, what we call reality. Though important, it ultimately falls into just one factor in a more complex idea of a phenomenon (force): the mind of the matrix.

Max Planck was ambiguous about whether our collective conscious mind plays a role or is entirely separate from this force, this matrix, this intelligence. There is no reinforcement of the belief that the outside world depends on my experience. You can implant any other ideology into this ambiguity—for instance, the Singularity notion in A.I where machines become self-aware is an error in thought, but does that mean it dismisses the notion of a matrix of the mind or a creator-god? You can see in this imbalance the error in thought still creates doubt when there is a lure of a creator mind. Or maybe it’s about accepting two points of thought: capturing the uncertainty inside a machine box as a tool, inside a machine-operated version of the cosmos. Or as thought forms with language and spells accompanying a living interacting cosmos within a community of beings.   

In the machine cosmos, a combination of hyperreal languages in metaphysics alongside quantum physics ran away with it in their version of the cosmos. In their discussion of light, thoughts, emotion and feelings, atoms are like source codes, matrix codes of information, and these atoms can communicate with each other even light years apart; that’s because time and space are an illusion. Light is intimately connected to reality; it’s also found at the centre of the toroidal field, at the centre of your heart. Egyptian and Biblical teachings teach us that light is the first thing to emerge from creation; “let there be light.” A word for cosmic conciseness is light, and the vibration of light is closer to vibration energy, and we are light beings.

Electric magnetic radiation consists of all the particles and waves we can’t see. Still, it makes up the rest of our reality, attributed to dense light energy that manifests in many ways. Also, there is the light of spirit, which is awareness; the first manifestation of the physical dimension is light, similar to the light of the sun that we perceive; this light closely resembles the light we call spiritual light. So everything is light particles, energy atoms vibrating at extraordinary speeds that we call matter. On one level, the human body is flesh and bones; on another, the body is a waveform made from light and chakra points. These have waves of aura emanating from the body, electrons vibrating to give the illusion of solidarity that we call the body.

The framing of transhumanism and technocracy is downstream from these metaphysical descriptions because transhumanism requires the meta-physics of tools. Still, it requires you to have a firm understanding of where the Human begins and ends. You can cross it and apply the Trans to the Human – what is the Human in Transhumanism? What is a Human being? And where does it begin and end? Esoteric thought, which sees the universe as fundamentally human-shaped.

If it is fundamentally human-shaped, what is the Ether in conjunction with the body? The Ether is a great cosmic mass of eternal forces of vibration made of destructive and constructive vibrations. It is where we derive our inventions and thoughts; every known thought comes from this; we access it through thoughts and will, and some access it at higher levels. Some call this the Akashic records or the Arc Echelon; other terms include the unified field, the heavenly realm, the source field, and the energetic properties of matter. People in their sleep can access this, where they discover their inventions, creations and imaginations. Before the great flood, people had higher vibrations and could easily access the Ether.

The Ether source energy is unified potential energy, the unified potential energy that needed to know itself; a source had to express itself to enable it to understand finite properties, so all the dimensions were created. As the nine dimensions were made, the vibrations and experiences became more separate until we arrived at this physical dimension, which is now in time (3rd dimension). Atoms are immortal; they never decompose, and when two atoms come together, they form a molecule when introduced to space. They separate but remain there; the atoms live on when the molecule dies. When you die, your body decays, but your atoms continue; light is not only a wave and light property but particle light properties. Particles, in essence, are energetic vibrations that appear static, finite and unchanging. This is why everything seems solid and real.

The grandness of the Ether invokes a type of insignificance similar to the vastness of space. What does this mean compared to spirits who came down and gave us tools? Was this just a momentary event within a larger cosmic moment in time? Did we give them too much credit for creating a self-referential delusion in our world? Should we give more credit to the achievements of humanity’s imagination and creativity rather than an external alien? Did we forget to balance our humanness with that imbalance in front of us, often equated within the first imbalance of our first cosmic significance? Is this when we became posthumanist, android zombies with android phones? Did we ignore the trappings of transhumanism thought by unaware that transhumanism is stuck in Western classical rationalism and dualistic ontology? Did humans start encapsulating themselves with transhumanist inherent mind and body separation, subject and object separation tied to technology?

There are new age elements in Max Plank’s philosophical quote, and the New Age is quite dependent on hyperreal-materialism (including hyperreal-space jargon); I suspect hyper-materialism has limitations, and New Age Doctrines allow them to progress slightly further. Combining mythology and hyperreal scientism gives us bad myths and bad science. However, naturally, it can help it do so; you can dissect the Bible, where it will impart a hidden message in the form of a factual science, like what is found in the formula table. As a result, it gives a genuine approach while imparting an intuitive act instead of something hyperrealistic.

I’ve argued that you must throw away aspects of hyperreal-space-materialistic notions of gravity (and hyperreal cosmology) within the theoretical work of quantum mechanics as a way to understand black holes and Big Bang theories (fictional stuff). Therefore, you can focus more on quantum mechanics [of the nuclear] and the molecular micro-model of genetic code. Weirdly, Max Plank used a hyperreal description, i.e. solar system, to describe atoms ‘holds this most minute solar system of the atom together,’ perhaps to paint a picture. You’ll find most of the hyperreal assertions borrow from the atomic world. As it were, there are movements in modern physics; new thinkers have determined because of quantum field theory or gravity, and quantum theory has indicated that there is no such thing as space-time fundamentally in the laws of physics. There is no such thing as gravity, only in the hyperreal sense, so I would describe it as hyperreal force and quantum theory.   

They concluded that Einstein’s gravity (force) and quantum theory together, which entails a space-time paradigm, cannot be fundamental, and therefore, particles in space-time cannot be fundamental. They’re just eradicable representations of the symmetries of space-time. This means that gravity and quantum physics, which often define a hyperreal cosmos, have reached their limits. Now, by excluding this ontology (component), new physics can make measurable claims; mathematically, they can make billions of terms into one term. No doubt all credit goes to them, but it was a postmodernist claim, to begin with, by Baudrillard, J. 

Most of Darwin’s work on evolution is wrong except for ‘principles of natural selection’, which needs to be understood; transformations of forms as a Darwinist theory are not a fact in nature; in reality, it is a ‘theory in transformation.’ This way elevates Darwin’s evolution, which is fine, but it will also credit all the wrong stuff, which is the majority. Evolution gave us adaptive behaviours; part of that process is hiding the truth and giving you substances of reality. In the matrix, Cyper says: ‘The image translators work for the construct program – but there’s too much information to decode the Matrix.’ I distinctly remember him saying the program excludes construct; it’s just me; I’m having a mandella effect moment. For transhumanism’s singularity moment, you would have to build or construct something (an interface) that can outpace the fabric void of infinity while waiting for self-awareness to come online, which is impossible.   

There is no universe; there is only the universe in you. Everything breaks down to a level that one wishes to observe. 3D plain is just an illusion of electrons, protons, and neurons buzzing around at great speeds, creating the illusion of matter, time and space. If everything, material or matter, are just possible movements of consciousness, and choosing moments of movements to bring experience to manifestation, it may be accurate, but it’s incomplete; it allows a factor in determinism as an excuse for things like war crimes and genocide; it was determined or just movements of consciousness. We can’t dismiss the failure of determinism, and the failure, in reality, is just an illusion concept.   

Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – Kant’s Revisions: Kant put the brakes on such notions and would become a revisional beacon to a runaway thought – by advocating that we do not perceive a pre-given world, but the structure of the mind is bringing forth phenomenon. Created by as much as the mind, that’s, by whatever is out there. When you sit at a table, touch the table, and see the table, you have this phenomenon; you have this conscious experience of colour and shape of tactile pressure, but these phenomena are not the ultimate causes. Kant was convinced that there was something beyond that. Something out there is generating these sense perceptions and giving them to us.

In a revising a quote, “3D plain is just an illusion of electrons, protons, and neurons, buzzing around in great speeds creating the illusion of matter, time and space; while simultaneously been given to us by God, and having the ability to change consciousness as part of God’s children. This statement by Carl Sagan: “The earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena.” Now, with my revised statement, “The earth is a stage, in the centre of the universe, in a vast dimensional, parallel cosmic consciousness arena.”

Max Planck says, “We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind.” What is this intelligent mind? Is it our individual and collective consciousness or something else? Yes and no because we can collectively and individually change the matter through our psyche or physically in a material form or within the program. However, it still needs a stage to be completed, and who is responsible for this stage (earth plane)? Is it our God? In death and rebirth, there is a singularity point, and that point emanates light, which sets the stage for consciousness to manifest.

What is the space between void and awareness, all the states of matter and energy, and this is the centre of the toroidal field? The world of energy and matter connect “as above, so below.” We engage these two worlds simultaneously; we are essentially vessels of light. We are not the outside or the inside of our physical vessel, but we are the awareness and creator, not the creator, but a creator.

Singularity is not the birth of A.I. (Ahriman Intelligence) but merely a borrowed term for black hole gateways. When defined this way, it allows a version of the cosmos to be part of something more complex than human understanding. As opposed to the other interpretation that borrows hyperreal notions of a singularity with a hyperreal cosmos – intermingled with transhumanism- sorcery becomes tech-sorcery. Ironically, it is fuelled by its opposite, Christian fundamentalism and its rhetoric. Both believe that the catalyst is magic. However, both are inadequate for understanding the intricacies and complexities of magic. Technocracy and transhumanism cannot update themselves, while fundamentalism is strictly dogmatically reactionary. So, when you get a quote like this by Kevin Kelly, it only deepens their insufficiency: “The Technium is primed to hijack matter and rearrange its atoms to infiltrate it with séance” – What technology wants Pg 328. 

This concept is a point of contention for both opposing sides. We have already discussed why reductionism is becoming less relevant, except when it proves helpful (such as in explaining thermodynamics, which plays a role in communication and imagery). Particles in spacetime cannot be considered fundamental; therefore, any machine designed to manipulate matter and atoms is inherently limited by the impossibility of constructing such a device. This limitation can be mathematically represented by a ratio of infinity to one or empirically expressed as a billion to one—where the billion is part of an infinite scale. Additionally, according to particle theory, a machine that cannot be created—whether or not it involves a conscious mind—cannot capture particles.

In a magical context, the term “séance” evokes the image of spirits possessing the ability to move objects in a supernatural setting. At its simplest, this notion of magic suggests that spirits have particles within them that allow them to manipulate objects or that magic can somehow control these particles to create movement. When magic drives a machine, it implies that it is no longer self-aware; it’s not a conscious being of its own making but merely a Tulpa, a thought form manifesting in reality. This distinction is why magicians tend to have a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between spirits and technology or tools. While this relationship can be productive and valuable, it can also become counterproductive. When magic is viewed merely as a means to achieve an end, it may reduce the depth of magical understanding to a fundamentalist perspective, where invoking reactions is the only goal. We are witnessing a similar phenomenon with specific transhumanist platforms today.

In this machine-operated version of the cosmos, the tools spirits gave us became a subsequent Cain and Abel imbalance and dual nature. Cain (the evil side of humanity) and his technology made him rich and ruler of the modern world, a holographic world in collapse, a matrix of sorts, from whom rich materialist cultists wish to escape. Alongside, their transhumanism goal is to have you resonate with the cloud rather than the divine intelligence, in a far more conspiratorial notion to enslave the human soul in technological imprisonment. Resonating with intelligence doesn’t abdicate technology; it does mean having the sophisticated metaphysics of tools. However, the idea that efficiency is the only way out is perplexing. At least those with a magical understanding can separate magic and the limits of technology and have the nuance to recognise many ideologies, such as technocracy and transhumanism. So, you can position yourself not to be polarising but rather that the framing must have a cosmic significance, like a vision, enlightenment, and experience you can relate to.  

Quantum and metaphysics can lead us to believe that our minds and consciousness are everything. However, could they only be partially correct when considering Kant’s philosophical foundations? Additionally, placing oneself above the concept of God can create a significant separation from the divine, an error in understanding. It is said that God became man so that man can aspire to become like God, which can be achieved through enlightenment, often referred to as Christ’s consciousness, spiritual practice, or even through the grace of God. Spiritual enlightenment does not signify an end; rather, it represents another level in the ongoing journey. This enlightenment comes in waves, appearing and disappearing, so spiritual seekers often pursue it. Once it fades, they become, in many ways, like everyone else. The key difference is that they know where they wish to be.

.

.

Normal Behaviour in an Apocalyptic World:

.

.

---

.

Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – a Double Edge Sword [Posted initially on 14th July 2023]: Philosophical symbolic utilitarian mysticism often expresses itself in the impossible balance within our human qualities, such as an example can be found in Biblical myth. Fifty days after Christ’s ascended, the Pentecost would arrive (this is God’s spirit delivered or Sophia and Prudence’s promise in (Ephesians 1) – this is commonly known as a gnostic awakening or a Pentecostal illumination, an act (or gnosis or wisdom) that illuminates within the hearts of man (the light and the way). Pentecost, a term generally associated with Protestantism or evangelicalism, was associated with a movement that started while Christians were hiding. Christ was the vehicle and the announcement of the coming of the Pentecost and the Holy Spirit, the illumination. It is represented as the spirit of God moving and symbolically associated with the ‘breath’ [Pneuma]: he breathed on them and said to them, ‘Receive the Holy Spirit’.    

The global covid simulated false flag method for abating a virus in its reasoning impart wearing a mask, knowing all too well the evidence to such methods does not match common sense and the reasoning against it. It was a worldwide symbolic representation of masking the breath or pneumonia, masking the Holy Spirit and the truth. The struggle of our brain’s left and right hemispheres indicates the struggle of our polarised governed reality, which is fine. However, when the balance becomes too weighted on one side, it becomes a problem. Hating and loving something to a degree are forms of worship; we are imbuing things with a co-creative faculty that most of us are unaware of. We are changing the world as we perceive it, and our perceptions are being manufactured by external stimuli such as hoaxes [with varying degrees of truth embedded in them] like the virus (false flag operations), ideologies, Hegelianism, etc.   

Such external forces are often connected with technology as a double-edged sword; we are reminded that certain technologies do not progress linearly or optimistically. It is merely a technology humans can use for whatever purpose, such as a vaccine or immunization for our newborns and influenza patients. Ignorant of our complacency but open to unquantifiable uncertainties, we ignored the limitations of vaccines as a technology and that they cannot lead. Furthermore, such an effect opened it up to dangerous and romantic gestures, a corporate covid endeavour (for the pharmaceutical industry). We were led to believe in lies because we thought technology could not make mistakes, or we believed in a technology that does not exist or made it look like that technology exists. This impossible balance is significantly linked to earlier cosmic significances and human existence.  

Steiner invoked in his revelation about a cosmic being called Ahriman; he examined that superstition science [or scientific superstitions] was the illusion and means employed by Ahriman. Humans and their different groups are at odds, as seen in our modern-day political arena. [“These Ahrimanic powers are at work wherever disharmonies between groups’ people arise” – Steiner]. Ahriman is the name of the evil principle as portrayed in Zoroastrianism. Also, by contrast, Ahriman is responsible for our mechanical ingenuity and technical inventions [Ahriman’s technologies].

Ahriman is also different to Lucifer (and Lucifer, the morning star or light bringer, often gets disconnected from the fallen Angel Samyaza and is perceived as Satan, a name derived from Saturn). Ahriman is closer in association with the Demiurge as well as Satan. In the gnostic sense, the Demiurge [commonly known as our creator God or God] acts similar to Satan or is Satanic in some sense. The leader of the fallen Angels is associated with the title of Lucifer; these fallen angels, often called Watchers, would show or educate humans about technology. And in that, Ahriman and Lucifer share the title that inspires technology but are seemingly distinct. Lucifer is seen as the overseer within this cosmic technology project to give humans, and undoubtedly, Ahriman oversees Lucifer – or is likened to Lucifer, the project manager, and Ahriman, the stakeholder. Gnosticism worldview is based on the spiritual rebellion against God, at which God is not the True God, but the Demirgue. This conflict or imbalance juxtaposes rebellious Christian groups vs. Traditional Christian Orthodoxy; a debate ensues about whether there is a God beyond God. Furthermore, even at the earliest historical cosmic significant event from the very moment, we were given technology alongside the Christ event. Jewish authors were inherently gnostic even before Gnosticism became a thing, which they coded in hymns, notably in Pslams.   

You will see how this imbalance systematically and semantically, in one way or another, finds itself fractioning every denomination and every religion. Furthermore, this is not the kind of struggle that appoints doubt in Art and democracy, which has positive aspects – this is the type of imbalance that confuses religion as a whole and core cult belief systems. For instance, the Jewish God, Yahweh, mistakenly gets associated with the Demiurge as Yahweh, but Yahweh is represented as Saturn [Satan]. As we know, the Demiurge is not inherently Satanic but only acts as Satanic, and the Demiurge is above Saturn. Already, there is confusion about the roles and which true title belongs to which archetypal gods. Yahweh, the God who kills Moses, after which Moses’s successor is Joshua, and it’s Joshua who brings the Jewish people to the Promised Land.

Why did Yahweh [God] kill Mosses in Deuteronomy 34? Mosses claims Manna ‘from heaven’ Man + NA is Sodium, which also means salted fish of the Portuguese, but in Egypt, it’s salted Fish People. In other words, cannibalism was involved; canninite/cannibalism – eating the flesh and drinking the blood of Christians, Moses wanted to prolong his 120-year-old age. Moreover, anybody conducting cannibalism is prohibited in the Promised Land, so Joshua had to wipe and clean him in the river. Joshua means Yeshua means Jesus. In John 8:44, Jesus tells Sadducees and Pharisees that they guard the gate and do not let the people and that they worship the devil. And this is why Jesus continues to challenge Moses’s law. The New Testament imparts that ‘I came here to uphold the Law’ in all sincerity; it’s Yahweh who upholds his Law with Moses by killing him at the foot of Mount Nebo by putting a death curse. Furthermore, it’s no coincidence that the Book of Psalms (Psalm 47) is Gnostic as it claims ‘for the Lord most high is terrible’ [the Lord Most High in this analysis is Yahweh] and that God [True-God] is a different Deity altogether. Of course, Deuteronomy 34 is censored as Exodus 4 with the moralities of circumcision practices; maybe cannibalism is too much for Sunday school.  

How does one come to terms with this imbalance? Are we to believe in miracles? Manna (food) fell from heaven; no technology is being taught here, and we were asked to believe in miracles. Biblical censorship is, for the better, the choice between knowing and advocating a theory of truth for the public as opposed to a censored private personal established scripture. The latter invokes freeing oneself from a place where they are the only one who knows – and the quality in which an intuitive moment of clarity is seen as godlike or as babblings of a demented mythical conspiracy theorist. The other implies censoring mythical attributes that may be beyond human quality understanding. In that regard, it comes from a place of love, which involves a state of being, which may be a gift from the gods, whether religious or mythological.      

In our modern-day predicament, how does a historical cosmic event regarding technology given to us by fallen angels impart this impossible balance? The spirits (fallen Angels) who fell are the spirits who teach, whether it’s to make swords, knives and shields to run a civilisation – let us not forget they also taught the secrets of magic. These spirits favoured teaching women intermingled with a sexual component coupled with the fall; it became central to Western magic and witchcraft. Furthermore, by their fall, they are fleshed or embodied in the physical; they do not remain in the sky. Moreover, to fall also means to fall in battle; these men of renown were part of the battle in Heaven and would bring that battle onto Earth. War is the hallmark of myths as well as empires and civilisations.   

Normally, we believe these non-canonical tellings of spirits who fell and taught humankind technology with a positive zeal. Alongside the very dualist nature of scripture, meaning good angels exist. The spirits who fell helped humans unlock the thinking faculty of man and his imagination, which would impact every step of civilisation. Suppose you see each step as an archetypal keyframe in time in which certain types of technology are made apparent for that time. Such a claim can otherwise reduce human achievements and be given into spiritual external factors. In doing so, it tunnels our intuition into superstition and positions the world into something self-referential into a delusion. It’s only ironic if we see myth parables as truth and not as superstition. Maybe a better way of framing it, post-original contact, is through the attendant spirit that inspires human faculty and guides us throughout civilisations. It’s slightly different from fallen angelic teachers because such attendant spirits impose themselves within our co-creative faculty, which has implications for how we perceive the world.

Angel magic is complex and weird; you’re not ordinarily dealing with good angels that sit on your shoulder because you have to acknowledge memory and how memory works. So much has happened between 3500 B.C. to our present time. These fallen Angels, seen as demoted celestial hierarchies who snuck out through the back door at times, were once alien teachers and various forms of gods of the mighty dead were brought back into Christianity in the form of angelic figures. Fast forward to the Enlightenment era at the height of theosophy, and at the backdrop of a technological, industrial revolution, Alice Baily flipped the narrative and turned the fallen angels into romantic heroes (sinless), reviving a secret cult that had been dormant. These demoted angels that snuck out at the back door become the ‘lords of sacrifices’; their sacrifice is in the form of martyrs as they become mortal to bring about a grand divine plan of evolution. They convinced themselves that their purpose was by the decree of God. Furthermore, it would seem the Elites, governed leaders, cult groups, secret societies, and tech billionaires would align themselves with these newly reborn fallen spirits.

In the previous post, we explored … how one expresses their humanness, If not to live our lives, struggling with the dynamic of an impossible balance – through what is perceived as normal behaviour. Seeking normal behaviour also means seeking equilibrium. Intrusions from spirits through technology have disrupted that balance, whether that balance is to seek equilibrium or within the balance of life and death. The catalyst is the technology and its capacity to morph itself within the enormous mechanisms of government structures and national security services. Furthermore, it is intensely focused and dependent on practical leadership activities of complex humanism interwoven among gatekeepers and cultists. 

Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – Inventing Gods, Angels & the Greatest Trick the Devil Ever Pulled: We have established that Lucifer is not Satan; we also concluded that Satan refers to (a Planet) Saturn (the Stargate Celestial) or Athoth, also Draco. Saturn is the outermost planet; it is the stargate, the gateway from the imprisonment of the Archons (earth planet) and into the Stars into the heavens and passing Kronis (Saturn) into infinite time.

For a while, there was so much focus made by Christian-Conspiracy-theorists that the culprits for a worldwide conspiracy […] are Satanic or Luciferic based. In doing so, they created a type of Golem; instead of being made out of clay, it was made out of a manifestation of their imagination, traditionally in its simplistic form, a Red Beast with Horns. It intended to provoke anti-Christ imagery, a nightmare in their minds; raptured by their horror, they figured that the world must see this apocalypse. Their direction is correct regarding the provocation of a nightmare, but the direction for truth hardly sits on an arrow of linear causality; it veers off in many directions. Lucifer is rebellious, defies God, and is said to be associated with Samyaza, the fallen angel of pride. However, given his association with Venus (Adonaiou) as the morning star, its association is only in the fall. He is a light inspiration, the thinking faculty of imagination, the Promethean fire and light bringer. 

An imbalance comes to light about etymologies referenced from that period alongside its modern meaning. Also, confusion in names and titles complicates narrowing the names and their lineage down to a singular figure. Given the complex lineage, who is Lucifer? Lucifer may indeed be Mithra; there is limited factual data to indicate this other than the meaning of Eosphorus (which means light-bringer), and in Orphic cosmogony, the god of creation is Phanes, which translates to ‘bring the light’ and is Latin for Lucifer. Phanes also shares his archetype with Mithras. While Phanes is Latin for Lucifer, his myth is about creating a universe, which aligns more with Demiurge or even Ahriman.     

Mithraism was a religion created out of necessity and, therefore, not natural, not as a mythical institution that evolved throughout time. Scholars believe it was invented in early Rome and that Mithraism as a religion was created for the empire when the Roman Republic gave way to the empire. Seemingly parallels a secret religion that manifested around 1717 at the dawn of the British Empire with their fleets of boats that fell off from the earth, they created Freemasonry. They used it as a tool for the empire as a recruitment agency for evangelising other cultures that stood firm on their beliefs. However, those cultures were made intrigued by a persuasive argument that Christianity was not really what they believed in – and was a cover to hide the fact that they worshipped something else. They’ve made a template to gain other cultures’ favour and, by having their ear, called out their true religion, Mithraism, and Mithras as their idol. With Mithras, they have more room to embed their anti-Christ zeal than its parallel Lucifer, whose name already has full meaning.

Soon, this secret cult group started to morph into the state cult of that time, Sol. The idol Sol was a figure that replaced old pantheon gods such as Jupiter, Juno, Apollo, etc. Sol became a proto-monotheistic cult figure for the Sun. Both (Mitra) Sol and Mithras were embedded within the arts and framework of cultural Rome.

While these godheads share the same mythical concepts of light, they also share drastically different contexts in their semantics. Mithras and Perseus share the same notion of killing the Bull, but their motivation is different; Mithras is more ritualistic. Killing the Bull of Heaven was done to create the world. Perseus kills the Bull (Taurus) because the Bull represents being imprisoned in time (the Zodiac) – to which Perseus wishes to escape. Perseus is a demi-god, while Mithras and Phanes are gods. Perseus gains power through the technology gifted by Hermes. Both Lucifer and Perseus are about escaping the bondage of God or defying God and defying the limitation of time and achieving immortality. Perseus kills the Bull (Taurus), which raises the celestial hierarchy. He then rises out of the Zodiac and transcends time into Cepheus. Lucifer defies God by ascending Tartarus into Earth, and the ascent back to the Stars would be imbued in Mithras.   

Previously, we described the choice between a gnosis moment where you either advocate a theory of truth for the public or a censored private personal epiphany. The latter invokes freeing oneself from a place where they are the only one who knows – and the quality in which an intuitive moment of clarity is seen as godlike or as babblings of demented mythical-conspiracy-theorist. We can argue for an intuitive synchronistic mysticism, but it must also pass reason for thought and be free from instrumental reasoning and utilitarianism.

And because we have shared knowledge, it’s neither godlike nor demented; Northrop Frye once said: “There are no uncritical loyalties,” and therefore criticism is a positive strength; that criticism which, Octavio Paz says: “unfold the possibility of freedom and in this an invitation to action.” These are like sets of elements that help our way through society. Even with our myriad tension and opposing qualities, these are hardly criticisms but closer to theories, which can invite doubt. The separation between Phanes, Mithras, and Persuas is apparent, so it leaves the question of who Lucifer is. It is a being of ambiguity. This leaves Lucifer/Mithras more of an archetype and shows that the real veneration for secret cult groups is with fallen angels.

In immortal, Theseus channels Perseus – after killing the Bull is rewarded a technology by the gods, he gets an invite to be one with the gods (he transcends time) after he kills Hyperion.

.

In the modern setting, Lucifer would be a beacon for Christian-conspiracy-theorists manifested golem and a convenient byproduct for the elites who worship the watchers as all the uproar is focused in the wrong direction. The intent is made powerless when the focus is not on target; a clear distraction, not by their making, never the less was there to take advantage of, which they did. Manifested in their imagination and led by clueless conspiracy theorists who continue to spur out that the big bad is the Illuminati groups, Satanism and Luciferianism. They all fail the litmus test, or must they be guided in the right direction to make them realise a truer interpretation? For the moment, they’re falling for the greatest trick the devil ever pulled.

How clueless conspiracy theorists view Satanism is through horror and the glorification of shock value, like followers of Anton Lavey or fans of rock metal musicians. After any crime or murder that has a hint of shock value is seen on the news, the blame ultimately gets appointed to a loner wearing a metal shirt. The media has entrained the public’s obsessions with mob rule to its simplistic reasoning. For a while, there was the claim that there was space for Satanisim to be safe by advocating that they worship not a diety but a figure of literature. A person who embraces Satanism, though not identifying as a Satanist, embodies a postmodern perspective, as the term “Satanist” symbolises a boundary against traditional religions.

A synopsis that fits better to actual Satanists [neoliberals, corporate oligarchies, political, media and educational establishments] if they ever feel the pressure of getting found out who they really are and who they worship (Fallen Angels). It’s a statement they can use as it raises superstition notions and reverence to rationalism and scepticism because it has all the hallmarks of utility and is therefore used for distraction, but ultimately not what they believe.

Secret Cult groups would never associate themselves with Satanism, the type of Satanism Christian conspiracy theorists view it as. This type of Satanism would have a reactionary effect, a low-key tangent movement called Satanic-Panic where fundamentalists like Tex Mars and Jack Chick would go about propagandising. Established Churches, conservative or otherwise, had no interest in that satanic movement or disassociated themselves from what Satanic Panic spokes-groups and what the media was propagandising. However, it did take over Hollywood in the late 70s and early 80s with the rise of slasher/horror films. And that energy allowed them to introduce their secret rituals to the public through events, hoaxes, entertainment, etc. As a result, Christian conspiracy theorists would double down in their culprit pointing but are still wrong, but are left entrained and dismayed and subconsciously initiated.     

Watcher cult groups believe that worshipping the spirits of the fallen (angels) and gaining their favour through communion, rituals, and ritual magic would help them escape mortality through technology, thereby achieving immortality – and by doing this, they must help fallen spirits get back into the hierarchal positions amongst the stars. Mithras is seen as the god of contracts and mutual obligation, and given cult groups’ initiation, a pact with ritual comes with swearing an oath, which comes from Mithras, for he is the god of oath. It’s fitting given how managerialism in a Faustian sense (deal with the devil) has been a tool for totalitarianism in our modern time and seems to prevail even amidst a collapse, you know, like a double-edged sword.

Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – Artificial Intelligence, Transhumanism and Tech-Sorcery: At the height of UFO popularity in the early 80s and mid-90s, conspiracy theorists claimed that technology was being backward-engineered from UFO crash sites. Whether you believe this or not, the rise of technological progress strangely came after World War 2, and the centre point of attraction concerning crash sites was Roswell and the secret military base area 51. From military planes to advances in computers and communications technology, it was believed (at least on the conspiracy side) that created circuitry artifacts were the inspiration for growth in transistors, CPUs, and computers.

In other circles, they claim the first solid-state transistor was guided by outside influences, which pertain to spirits and ritual magic. It gives new meaning to the saying: Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. There is nothing new here; many historical figures of significance had an attendant spirit whispering in their ear. The only difference was that they were not conjuring them; they were chosen. Those who do the ritual are making a Faustian bargain, and there is always a time the devil collects. Of course, when technology can no longer advance or move beyond the theory page or even be replicated, technology borrows religious faith, and the result manifests itself in scientism, which is indistinguishable from sorcery. 

Scientism imparts faith in their technology, but it’s also Satanic, especially concerning its philosophy in the belief that science is a good substitute for God. Not as heavy as Nietzsche’s “God is Dead” headline, this was a warning about what happens when you do away with faith. With increased competition and funding, the emphasis on reproducing research needs to be revised and revised. This results in a reproducibility crisis, which has generally led the public’s confidence in science to waver; this can undermine the entire enterprise.  

There are many Scientism projects, one in particular, Transhumanism, which cannot even be produced, let alone replicated. The idea of Transhumanism goes against God in the sense that it goes against the natural cycle of life and death. Transhumanism is a seemingly science-fiction concept, but it is seen as a viable option for ageing elites, but ultimately a carrot in the immortality stick. This means that Transhumanism will never be realised, given the evidence and the sheer ridiculousness of the project’s aim or objective. Nevertheless, this hopeful utility is used to snag grant money for Transhumanisim’s goal and its side projects – like cryogenics, artificial intelligence, and robotics. However, all their projects cannot lead and seemingly act as a messianic movement, which seems to offer us salvation in the motto just around the corner, a slogan like that of the true believer.  

Strangely, though, one of their prominent true believers is found in their opposite: Christian-conspiracy-theorist of the anti-Catholic kind. In their disdain for transhumanism/posthumanism endeavour (but secretly believe in it), in a sense, it’s true as it drives their reactionary purpose. They are often blinded by their goals of spreading fear porn (about AI and Transhumanism) rather than approaching it with a truer sensibility, an honest investigation. They usually remark in their analysis of transhumanism through the implication of ethics and philosophy, but what does not get mentioned is that their approach is coated with a fundamentalist cover.

Technological singularity is a theoretical moment when artificial intelligence will have progressed to greater-than-human intelligence, radically changing civilisation and human nature. Artificial intelligence with awareness being born in a sea of information or singularity is a pipe dream; it will never come true. It’s the Demiurge bashing at the glass firmament of the upper Pleroma; it’s the fallen angel spirits wanting to escape their Archonic imprisonment (Tartars); it’s Thor bashing his hammer at the glass ceiling; it’s secret cult groups wishing to be gods, the literal ‘ye shall be gods” endeavour, and so forth. Artificial Intelligence, as we know it, is just an advanced programmable application, and robotics engineering coming off Boston dynamics are fake CGI renderings and hardly the science-fiction notions we romanticise in films like Matrix and Terminator films. Its science’s eschatological version of last things is often employed to drive and give credence to the transhumanism program.   

Transhumanism parallels creation myth stories predominantly about the creator-god in which He attempted to create proto-type human life but kept failing until He (GOD) breathed into him (Adam) His spirit with the blessing of the Mother (tricking Yaldabaoth) and the first Adam awoke. As humanity spread, He became Jealous as he realized humans had within them the spark of spiritual light, which has access to the upper Pleroma that the creator-God did not. Transhumanism is man’s attempt to bring down a cosmic event by mimicking creation myth stories as a mere technological project. It’s part of God’s failure, the creation of a Golem, the proto-type man before He breathed life into it – that will match transhumanism failure. And that is because the substance that gave the mindless substance (Golem) a soul was the breath of God – and like at the start of this essay, we described the breath or [Pneuma] as a symbolic representation of the Holy Spirit (as in the spirit of God moving). 

Fundamentalist-Christian-Conspiracy-theorists claim Transhumanism endeavours parallel revelation 13:15 after the image of the Beast (I suspect an empty vessel Golem) is brought forth (or built using technology); a False-Prophet (Lucifer/Mithras/Peruses, etc.) will give breath [Pneuma] to the image of the Beast. There is also the mention of the abomination of desolation (Golem) mentioned in Matthew 24.15-16, Which will come together in the Temple of Jerusalem, where it will come to life through ritual. And that this ritualistic event mimics technocratic rituals and their artificial intelligence intentions. Transhumanism is waiting on the technological advancement of singularity as justification or proof for the experiment to work. Like before, ‘it will never happen.’ The False Prophet (leader of the fallen Angels) breathes into the artificial intelligence Image. We will not bring forth an Adam with spirit, but ‘the Beast’; however, we know this is impossible because singularity is the catalyst. Moreover, the singularity is purely fictional, and there is no stretching this fictional type to asymmetry or symmetry; it’s just a fact.  

The False Prophets equates to fallen angel spirits (leaders of the fallen angels being the false prophets), and ritual practices were used during medieval times. Where communion (or breath is used as an impetus) with the spirits through empty human vessels. These practices coincide with modern MK-Ultra practices because the results are more apparent, rather than claiming that Satan’s great agenda is to produce its own Golem out of the human race and that we might abandon the image of God. It can be concerning, given that we inherited the image of God through the first Adam image, and there is a responsibility not to debase it. However, framing it so it is vulnerable to some attack or invasion is inaccurate. When the Spartans destroyed Athens, Athens’s citizen-based experiment was also destroyed, despite this experimental society’s uncertainty, costs, and complexity. Athen’s citizens did not abandon it. A product of Athenian civic education created a leader in Thrasybulus. He, with his citizens, drove the utilitarian dictatorship out.

I suggest avoiding getting caught up in the romanticised language of fundamentalism. The idea that an army of technological Golems, who have abandoned the energised God and are energised by the breath of a false prophet, will invade and rule like a dictatorial force is absurd. We understand that God failed to create Adam without the divine spark. Therefore, this Golem enterprise will also fail if it can succeed rationally. Our public service, civic education, democracy, and sense of restraint will remain resilient against the technocratic romanticism of false prophets and AI Golems, which seem to be driven by wealth-based economics and self-interest. Moreover, the false prophet’s attempts to breathe life into something do not compare to the breath of the Creator God. Even God Himself was deceived by His Mother, suggesting that there is an essence of the spirit of Sophia within everyone. This implies that the essence of the upper Pleroma is far greater than anything into which the false romanticised breathes.     

What I mean is that we shouldn’t get swept up in the romanticised rhetoric of fundamentalism. The idea that an army of technological Golems, who have abandoned the image of God and are energised by the words of a false prophet, will rise and rule like a dictator is absurd. We know that God failed in His attempts to create Adam without that divine spark, so this Golem endeavour will also falter if we entertain the notion that it could succeed. Our public service, civic education, democracy, and self-restraint will likely be resilient against the technocratic romanticism promoted by false prophets and AI Golems, which often mask wealth-based interests and self-serving motives. Moreover, the false prophet’s attempts to breathe life into something are not comparable to the breath of the Creator. Even God Himself was deceived by His Mother, suggesting that within each of us lies a fragment of the spirit of Sophia. This indicates that the essence of the upper Pleroma is far more significant than anything the false prophet can animate.

Transhumanism’s philosophy is based on a fear of death by those who have not been struck by the Light of Grace and, in their uncertainty, build types of Golems thinking they can transfer their consciousness into them. And to live forever in a digital environment of their making or as androids for many reasons, some being to delay judgement or reincarnation, but ultimately a fictional techno imprisonment for the soul. A ritualistic (of the revelation kind) played out as a technocratic religion. It also has something to do with corporatism (of the money laundering kind), which is included in private and governmental grants. As convincing as they are, even in their fake laid-out project management plans, transhumanism can only come true in fiction.          

So we have fundamentalist-Christian-Conspiracy-theorists creating a Golem of their own, manifested in their imagination, in its simplistic form, a Red Beast with a Horn. Horror and glorifying shock value would manifest in the paranoid Christians of the Satanic Panic movement. It’s the fundamentalist-Christian-Conspiracy groups that gave Transhumanism a way out – through their type of Satanism. All blame and intent get pointed to the red beast with horns, and the real culprits or opposition (watcher cults) go about undisclosed. We also have Artificial intelligence and Transhumanism, the promise of a second-coming singularity, and the act of swapping consciousness from a human body to technological Golems – in this false realisation of end-time singularity. The False-Prophet breath into the image/Golem is a ritual based on revelation and creation myth reproduced by the corporate backing of Watcher Cults, who worship fallen angels.

There is an imbalance that Ghostics see clearly; it’s not Satan’s agenda to produce its own Golem out of the human race. Its various cult groups (humans) take orders or make contracts and bargains from fallen angelic beings in favour of technology and immortality, and in their corporation, are masterfully socially engineering the population through various programs like transhumanism. As we know, Satan is not what Satanism views it as; fundamentalist uses their type of Satan Golem as a way to point at an imagined entity, an appropriate opposition to steer away from that very fact that their God might also be the Creator-God or the Demiruge who at times act Satanic who wants to be the highest. Fundamentalists’ use of Satan-Golem is fitting for them as they cannot go beyond their orthodoxy of only one God paradigm as opposed to having a True God (One-Parent) who is above God (Jehova).

.

.

Normal Behaviour in an Apocalyptic World:

.

.

---

.

There is no Spoon; there is no Foucault’s Pendulum [Posted initially on 24th June 2023]:  “Do not try and bend the spoon; that’s impossible. Instead, only try to realise the truth… there is no spoon. Then you’ll see that it is not the spoon that bends but only yourself.” A quote is taken from the post-perennial (postmodern) film The Matrix expressed by a boy character in Buddhist clothing, but more precisely Zen-Buddhism – as a way to invoke enlightenment by revealing the inadequacy of logic. These riddles are intentionally structured to negate the mind’s ability to apply reason. This is intended to grant the pupil peace, not of mind but from it. So when the boy muses that the only way to bend the spoon is to realise it isn’t there, he may try to get Neo to silence the perpetual dialogue running through his mind by negating that part of his psyche with a question beyond logic. 

It’s about opening up your consciousness to all possible in so much as being conditioned to think otherwise and, therefore, not there to be taken. Logic implies that all things are known and must follow specific parameters and patterns, yet nature is anything but logical because the workings are more about synchronicity. In this context, “there is no spoon” is meant as a means for Neo to let go of his logical presumptions of what constitutes reality. As the boy says, “… you’ll see that it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself.” The limitations of Neo’s reality are self-imposed by the lenses through which he’s been taught to see the world. By letting go of what he’s so sure ‘he knows’, he finally opens up to what’s possible. Only when Neo moves beyond his disbelief does he become the person he was prophesied to be, ‘The One, ‘ which signifies his evolution to a consciousness beyond logic, where anything is possible.

In fictional telling, anything is indeed possible in terms of reality; however, in our three-dimensional existence, there is no gravity, but there is a force that brings us back down. We know reason cannot hold the truth to the cosmos, and we can only grasp the potentiality of it as reason [thought as reason]. And so no spoon merely shines a spotlight on the metaphysics of a reality beyond life, and that phenomenon often spills into the three-dimensional reality. We call it paranormal, miracle, alien, etc. We’ve established the non-rational types seek the spirit, which can be as rational as pure reason. Coupled with phenomena being given to us, which vibrates at a frequency of the highest level, the solid material, so if you jump off a high building, you will inevitably die. These facts bind to rationality as the building blocks of rationality but often get deluded into dogma in religion and hyper-materialism in secularism.

Fundamentalist dogma equates itself with fact, like parables, as a rational reason but requires the potentiality of reason, like faith. Some have credited dogma as explaining an inescapable need to set the criteria. However, in a transient, changing cycle of ages, we are reaching an apotheosis of the apocalypse, the revealing of truth amid the fall of the empire. Changing the criteria is inevitable and postmodern. Just make sure it doesn’t get taken over by cult groups who deform the notion of good to drive a (destructive) agenda of their own.

Our Theo-logos pertain to our imagination within a dreaming universe; utilitarian mysticism rears its head when that dreaming universe is described as a hallucination. However, it’s not just a hallucination because most of the predictions are accurate or true – we’re continuously adjusting our imagination to our reality [Theo-logos]. Flat earth philosophy dictates we see the errors in the map [and the map is our heliocentric worldview] – and what the errors tell us is that if we are properly receptive to those errors as the map is deforming … we can turn into a Globe, the Globe still not our actual reality, but is still better than a map.

However, awareness has an enlightening component, an ‘awakening’ of sorts, and those who want to be plugged back into the matrix begin the renascence of change. Utilitarian mysticism often develops evidence to initiate facts as rational, but usually are illusions of facts that bind us to rationality – fake evidence for utilitarian mysticism. Foucault’s Pendulum is an example of this, an artefact that assumes that insofar as our map is accurate, it stands as supposed evidence and ratification of our previous errors, assuming those errors are incorrect to begin with. It doesn’t prove the earth moves; it only indicates factors of magnetism.      

Such an artefact shouldn’t be a gesture to indicate romanticism or juxtaposed within an object-oriented programming. You can be open to the wonders of the universe and accept the relationship between things that do not depend on the further existence of us being aware of those relationships – things have to be able to influence us and disclose each other in a way that is dark to us. And this can be examined in notions like dark matter on the metaphysical edge, which is fine [even though it steers towards hyperreal-materialism], imagination and anything above the Firmament is up for grabs. However, to bind the uncertain through the delusions of facts, the binds to rationality like Foucault’s Pendulum being able to pick the earth’s orbital – because somehow the … All … [or the unnameable Dou] is embedded in the singular. It does not reinforce the uncertainty of romanticism and would be an incorrect proposition because of the sheer amount of errors that the Pendulum has in itself, and not what it can reveal: a false claim. This is just symbolic, philosophical utilitarian mysticism, both dark matter and Foucault’s Pendulum. In other words, the Pendulum is a poor substitute for the dreamer who dreams of the world.

The New Normal – Art thou Hate Me: How does one act then, or how does one express their humanness, if not to live our lives, struggling with the dynamic of an impossible balance? What is normal behaviour? This question can elude most of us, considering that madness often becomes normalised; we then call it the ‘the new normal.’ Usually drilled in us by media, social or otherwise, a conjured narrative to expound extremism in both polarity and not realising it’s a balancing act in nature. Along with the notion of meta-morphing opposites [a subject I glossed over in my previous post – Flat Earth; Enclosed Creationism; Conspiracy (Theory), Intuition and Imagination – Part Nine] a notion taken from Baudrillard, J – who describes the “meta-morphing of opposites to perpetuate itself in its censored form”, a notion regulated through parody. I updated it to coincide with nature and that these polarised dualities are the central pillar of both sides of the Shekinah or the Tree of Life. The struggle of imbalance, the pushing and pulling, keeps civilisation from falling by the wayside. However, this little adjacent trojan-horse-trick sometimes has a hidden inverse agenda that skews it to one side.

The morphing opposites can use a tactic to steal words and their etymologies. Such a case can be examined by Dinesh Joseph D’Souza, who claims fascism started on the left and proceeds to change its etymology and meaning. It’s no surprise then that most reactionary and far-right groups use the term’ fascism’ to mean these changed forms. He is incorrect because fascism’s antithesis will always be Communism. You can sense his trying to garner rationality to skew a direction in his favour; rationality is constantly working in conceiving his system of thought. It also puts a layer of false utility within it but doesn’t make it rational. If you push utilitarianism in a leadership role, it will devour, marginalise and unravel the non-utilitarian elements within it. And that’s because utility is not thought nor an argument – it does not, in and of itself, have a purpose or a direction.        

His clever use of putting political figures as a form of utility then associating with it a type of linear instrumentality [like its own internal investigation rather than a free equiry] – “this politician figure […] that showed racist videos in the white house was a politician figure […] a progressive democrat – and therefore progressivism was married to racism at the hip, so don’t pretend its right-wing phenomenon.” There are a few problems with this one: instrumental reason does not exist, the godhead cannot make many appearances on earth, and so mere associations do not imply progressiveness is married to the hip; it pretends to deliver rational solutions and claims primacy of place. However, it only marginalises other views of reason and any other human quality. Two:  utilitarianism is based on method and system; for instance, a toilet’s function and utility are to dispose of waste. Does that mean the human quality of reason is encapsulated in the toilet. Does it mean all human qualities are encapsulated in this political figure […]?       

He certainly likes to wear the badge of political scientist; however, political science, like all social sciences, is not a science. Yet, having science in the title is another example of stealing words and defusing their meaning. Real science has a truer process and an ambiguous certainty because it’s all about asking questions. As you never fully have the answer, more questions are asked; science, whatever the area, only answers in bits or pieces as you learn more. In contrast, social sciences constantly attempt to assert answers, which is dangerous.       

Fascism [a far-right terminology for Totalitarianism] is not the only word that the far-right and traditional Christians misconstrued; socialism is another word. To them, it’s no different from communism or corporatism. While both socialism and corporatism have systems that involve collective ownership of business, they are based on different principles and have different goals. Corporatism is often associated with fascism and authoritarianism, while socialism is associated with democratic socialism, worker cooperatives and other forms of democratic governance. You can see clearly that Dinesh Joseph D’Souza is attempting to change fascism’s association with authoritarianism into socialism or communism. However, there is a clear distinction between Corporatism and Socialism.

How did we get here? Answers that can further be elaborated when we find meaning in democracy through art. Or, instead, what is the nature of art if you’re a writer? It comes down to two points: one, the belief in freedom of expression with no limitations. Two, writers must not engage in encouraging hatred. Great art never promotes hatred. Otherwise, that’s propaganda – this idea parallels or encapsulates democracy because it’s founded on relationships between people. Art is a balance between the individual and the group; you can’t simply have dominion over the individual. You have to have some terrible unresolvable equilibrium constantly changing between the individuals’ responsibilities and rights and the groups’ responsibilities and rights. That struggle was lost in the West, and to an extent, the obsession with individual rights opened the door to corporatism. In the late 19th century, the Catholic Church proposed a group-based form of running society, but it was based on obedience. Soon after, people like Mussolini picked up on it, and corporations followed eventually, followed by interest groups after the Second World War. There needs to be a balance between the two.

Great art can be many things, and often, despite the two points laid out previously, it can’t help but be political, and most of the time, politics is buried deep within it. Art may reveal a type of truth, but given that ‘struggle’ that was lost and must be regained again in the form of ‘doubt’ as meaning in democracy – putting truth at the core of it is an invalid point of measure. Nor can you put truth at the core of art. We allowed art to be marginalised from the reality of politics and citizenship and the great ethical debates of the citizens; what is left is a struggle in the margins where good artists try to draw it in but are constantly shoved back. So, the heart of the arts is mainly about entertaining the middle class.

Let’s examine Ben Shapiro, a far-right YouTube personality who made a video trashing Jon Lennon’s song ‘Imagine’ – to him, it’s a communist manifesto. He then persists in laying his rhetoric over the song as it plays, and as a result, Ben Shapiro comes off looking like a ‘clown.’ The song Imagine is an example of good art because, at the heart of it … it’s all about the struggle we discussed; the song is complicated and full of nuance, and the song itself asks the act of imagining. As one of the song lyrics: ‘imagine no possessions’ affirms doubt and, therefore, that struggle. The song does not ask you to do much, and Lenin doesn’t ask you to buy something or vote for somebody. Instead, he wants you to come to the one realisation that so much of our pain in our world is caused by ideas that we came up with. We invented religion, countries, and possessions, and whether you like those things or not, is it good for the world?

It’s uncontroversial to say that they have left us with a lot of lousy baggage, working to get to an afterlife that probably doesn’t exist. Instead of devoting our lives to the world around us, fighting each other because we fundamentally think the people of our country are more deserving than those in their country.  These are our ideas and nobody else’s; we can change them, do what with them, and imagine something different. That simple and surprisingly challenging action is enough within the song’s context. After all, imagining is enough to send a weird person like Ben Shapiro to an intellectual tailspin. If it causes him to whine about the worst thing ever made, and so obviously threatens him and makes him sweat, then it must be meaningful.

Both Dinesh Joseph D’Souza and BenShapiro lack sociological imagination or transcendence of the self, our ability to situate ourselves as individuals and as nodes in a complex society and culture. Ben Shapiro’s colleague Jordan Peterson [and the whole Daily Wire Club] have the same sociological dysfunction, and he also mimics D’Souza’s use of instrumental reason and utilitarianism regarding his misreading of Postmodernism. Essentially, it makes a satellite view of Postmodernism and obfuscates a space for a rebuttal where facts and reason may give better value.   

I’ve discussed postmodernism at length (throughout several posts) and that all the uproar surrounding it came from Peterson, who magically created [a satellite version of postmodernism], a leftist intellectual bogyman to fight against. A closer look at his analysis reveals a misrepresentation of postmodernist authors, whom he regards as culprits. However, at the heart of it is really about his fear of unquantifiable uncertainties, which is no different to any Christian conspiracy theorist/traditionalist-Christian and their inherent demonic thought forms. He wanted to blame the woke movement on postmodernism through his misreading of deconstructionist and existentialist authors and consciously creating a fundamentalist claim. It’s sorcery in itself.

This opens the door for traditionalist Christians to associate postmodernism with relativism and contrast it with modernism and pre-modernism so they can associate a type of meaning through a polarising understanding of ethics, collectivism, altruism, and misconceptions of modernism as an individual. Moreover, it does not work as a philosophy because altruism is neither an ethical theory nor individualism.      

	*	Woke-isim is normative, not postmodern
	*	Woke-isim and identity politics came out of the new-atheist movements rather than postmodernism
	*	Postmodernists reject the relativist label
	*	Postmodernism does not make sense when contrasted against modernism or even medieval pre-modernism
	*	Postmodernisim does not advocate acquisition of power

.

Most Christians now on the right-leaning polarity believe postmodernism committed patricide, when it’s really their spokesperson, Peterson, who changed the metaphor to fit a moral absolute paradigm. He somehow squeezed out the true meaning of postmodernism by tunnelling it through pure reason and adjacently using his mechanics of instrumental reason. This is really no different from what Sam Harris did with his book Morals and Values.        

Ethics play a role in memory and imagination; the fear of reality is the fear of ethics being unbound by rationality. These are present whenever ethics are confused with morality, and just like Sam Harris, who wants to bind morality with values and, therefore, be scientifically rational, Peterson intends to anchor morality with the absolute [moral absoultes]. Ethics is not what this is, nor is it moralistic because ethics needs to be exercised daily. Postmodernism is an art style, it’s an abstract form that came after modernism that peaked after a culturally revolutionary time in the late 60s and early 70s, and all that crap that surrounds it is in the realm of philosophy and politics. Straying from realism in an artistic aesthetic sense doesn’t mean straying from moral ideologies [give me a break]. It could be Christians borrowing rational methodology for iconoclasm to reject images that do not adhere to their extreme Christian philosophical thought. Postmodernism is a breakdown or semantic steps away from realism as it makes its way to a dreaming universe [a surrealistic dimension] that is language-based. This means you can communicate with it as a co-creator because the universe itself has a magical co-creating faculty about it.

Fundamentalist/Traditional Christians have many hang-ups about notions of magic, which is valid considering scientism invokes a type of sorcery that is often used by political figures to persuade an agenda. Although unaware of how magic plays a role in society and that it shouldn’t be generalised or radicalised so quickly because it engages with our intuition, imagination, and dreams, it eventually becomes a science. Imagination and art can often reflect that imbalance. 

— Look, do you have any idea how long it took me To paint like this? — No. — Twenty-five years.

.

Refusing to acknowledge the inability to depict is an absurd assertion in postmodernity, as this viewpoint fundamentally aligns with a Christian fundamentalist ideal. For example, spiritual awakening or Christ-consciousness through the theo-logos is meant solely for Christ. Christians who wish to understand this spiritual connection are prohibited; they can only grasp it through their faith in Him. In this context, there is a clear and rigid mode of communication: those who seek to learn about the sublime cannot, and those who wish to imagine it also cannot. This frustration needs an outlet, so it has been reframed through utilitarian means and instrumental reasoning in postmodernity. Humanity cannot have the sublime at their fingertips; they must recognise their lack of knowledge and understand that they cannot accurately depict this deficiency—and they should not even attempt to do so. Postmodernism aims to illustrate the folly of believing one can depict the impossibility of depiction.

This is neither modernism nor postmodernism; rather, it represents fundamentalism acting with utilitarian mysticism. It acknowledges that imagination can be unquantifiable and uncertain, leading to a desire to control or utilize it. When imagination becomes troublesome, the response is often to exert control over it. This is evident in how they perceive imagination as a troubled brain. If one wishes to harness it, one might create something like COVID-19—examples of unquantifiable uncertainties used for manipulation. In their unusual reframing, fundamentalism typically seeks to grasp the uncertain through a dispensational ideal, such as the New Jerusalem, the war in heaven, and the mandate for heaven on earth. The claim for postmodernity, characterized by a disregard for grappling with uncertainty, is rooted in the imperial aspirations of the New Jerusalem. By this logic, it can be considered postmodern.

The only difference is that they’re making this ideal happen without considering human life. In tangent watcher cults whose mission is to destroy empires and civilisations by any means as they build cities underground, both use sorcery and are often Hegelian in their approach. This means there is no balance between the left and right because they are there for themselves instead of trying to grasp the unknown with art. Only one of the aspects of the two is tyrannical and dangerous: no city in the sky is going to come down, the godhead has never come down to earth, and no man has ever been to the moon – and yet, there are depictions of these concepts in artistry. And it would mean all Christian conspiracy theorists are postmodernists as they see the folly in numerous videos that try to depict a hoax or false flag as something real. And at the very same time, they are the same ones making a loud fuss about postmodernism. It will be a truer focus if their energy is focused on educating themselves on the rise of popularity interlinked with corporatism [hint …Trump].        

All artists can draw realism to an extent, and like any other skill, there are levels; some are extremely good; their paintings come close to being photo-genic, a skill that is honed throughout a lifetime. Refusing one discipline over another (or changing artistic methodology) does not equate to being tyrannical and dangerous. The artist can depict [whatever] and merely chooses not to. Suppose postmodernism is going to have this label. In that case, it will simply refuse, refusing to depict the inability to depict by depicting it because it’s all about that struggle and about that ‘doubt.’ Postmodernism is an art style, so its imagery will be constrained; the inability to depict is in its style, not the intentional management of the imagination.

More Propaganda than Postmodernism: The old colonial government instinctively understood that if they could destroy the languages, the art, and the spiritual that was tied into the art and the land, it could destroy the people. It’s not that the West never understood the importance of language and art – in the core of democracy and the existence of civilisations, they always understood it. However, they used it negatively because they were they were in a dominant position, and thank the gods, they failed. They came close to driving out the population of the true inherent of the land during the nineteen hundreds. However, a modern outlook will depict that dissimilar peoples can share land, resources, power and dreams while respecting and sustaining their differences – a story of trying to live together in peace and harmony. This modern outlook changes the idea of what democracy is. Despite what they went through, and even now, great animist cultures never forgot their art within their old and new civilisation in which spirituality is at the core of belief, not spirituality in political religion or religion isolated. Its spirituality is built into the culture, art, and politics – a surprisingly valuable realisation. Despite colonial history, we have these cultures who think and live in another way that integrates art and truth, art and democracy, art and civilisation, art and spirituality, etc. 

Even the formation of the U.S. Empire, in contrast to its constitutional documents, created many interesting art and culture. Popular music started from its grassroots, a reaction to the modernisation of democracy built under the industrialisation of slavery. It continued until the mid-60s, from the birth of the colonies to the 1960s. Though slavery existed everywhere in some way in other civilisations, prominently around medieval times, they grew out of it. However, the New World utopia was different; they were linked to the industrial revolution. The importance it had on British and European empires was that they were the ones who profited more from it than the Jurors of elite America. Despite that … came a grassroots culture that has instinctively fascinated the rest of the world. It opened the door for new possibilities, and with what FDR allowed [the prevention of elites getting through] and the impact of his policy, it empowered culture to strive on many facets.     

This culture that started at the grassroots paved the way for Appalachian folk songs [blue-grass] coming from disposed people in Scotland, Ireland, and England who ended up as farmers in the New World – that merged with African culture, which birthed Blues, Rhythm and Blues, folk, country, then rock‘n’roll.  Which evolved into commercial industries, paving the way for art, paintings, moving pictures, comic books and literature. This art and creativity can be so complex, but it endures in our ability to live with complexity and will often evolve with it. This all has something to do with the Indigenous role in society and civilisations, and to an extent, a struggle of a liberalist structure and that relationship within an intricate Indigenous spirit, and even in this new amalgamation. We are still discovering that they have more to offer in a broader sense than Western society can offer them – about civilisation and art and a profoundly different approach to democracy. A fresh perspective on truth through art, embracing animism and the land without nationalist tendencies. It promotes balance between the individual and the group, acknowledging complexity and encouraging coexistence with doubt.

This culture that started at the grassroots paved the way for Appalachian folk songs [blue-grass] coming from disposed people in Scotland, Ireland, and England who ended up as farmers in the New World – that merged with African culture, which birthed Blues, Rhythm and Blues, folk, country, then rock‘n’roll.  This evolved into commercial industries, paving the way for art, paintings, moving pictures, comic books and literature. This art and creativity can be so complex, but it endures in our ability to live with complexity and will often evolve with it. This all has something to do with the Indigenous role in society and civilisations, and to an extent, a struggle of a liberalist structure and that relationship within an intricate Indigenous spirit, and even in this new amalgamation. We are still discovering that they have more to offer in a broader sense than Western society can offer them – about civilisation and art and a profoundly different approach to democracy. A fresh perspective on truth through art, embracing animism and the land without nationalist tendencies. It promotes balance between the individual and the group, acknowledging complexity and encouraging coexistence with doubt.

Art uses intuition and imagination, and when it’s marginalised, it reduces to light entertainment as opposed to the time of Athens, where it was more about the full integration of society. This marginalisation comes in the form of politics and citizenship that use culture as a tool for empire and, in its endeavour, can have great value, but it still speaks for the empire. How do we live with that? Or how do we behave in that new normal?

Take, for instance, woke-isim and the reactionaries that came with it, like anti-woke, both fundamentally extreme in their polarity. The arts were marginalised way before the appearance of woke-is; woke is an endeavour to devour any sites of potent imaginal resistance as it tries to colonise it from the inside. Wokeisim undoubtedly struggles with shared knowledge as common sense. It doesn’t try to own the subject. Still, it dictates the quality of detail in their regard [including archetypes and stories] as the subject of creativity for an agenda – using political correctness to do it. All the while, anti-woke reactionaries who found a space for profit opposing certain aspects of woke’s hyper-individualist endeavour, not realising in their endeavour, may fall into nationalistic or reactionary individualism. What is missing are those silenced [artists and artist-prophets] at the edges of society that only ever emerge when the sun breaks through the clouds. They know such Hegelian plots are on purpose and are only quick to remind that they didn’t originate from the left or right but from the rational types dependent on the behaviours of the unconscious irrationals. Things that must be understood:

	*	Woke is based on hyper individulasim but does not stem from the radical left that’s reactoinary scape-goating.
	*	Woke-isim aligns more with the left of Neo-Liberalsim [post-leftist] this is where the cult group set its foundation.
	*	Woke is dialectic in its motive
	*	Woke is mistaken as being postmodern when its really Rationalism at the core

.

Christians, both traditionalists and fundamentalists, confuse postmodernism with hating a stylized approach to postmodernism. This is because it instinctively implies what they hate about themselves. In that regard, postmodernism must not be used as a tool for reactionary uproar because your whole basis is fundamentally wrong. Art can be used as propaganda; therefore, blaming postmodernism as a type of propaganda becomes mute because it’s like blaming the paintbrush instead of the depiction. The element and quality they lack, which allows it to reach beyond itself to a sense of the other and therefore free from dictation or agenda … is art unbound by rationality and free in our imagination.                                                                                             

Ian McGilchrist, the author of ‘Master and his Emissary’, also seems to tip in a direction where obfuscation is a prerequisite, like Peterson. He equates his book title to Nietzsche, although Nietzsche never wrote such a myth to instigate such an inspiration for that title. A myth in which he equates cerebral hemispheres, one side to the MasterMaster and the other to the emissary – the MasterMaster and emissary are about our brain’s cerebral hemispheres that should cooperate but are in conflict. This conflict plays out in recorded history through the seismic shifts characterising Western culture’s history. At the moment, it finds itself in the hands of the vizier who, with all its gifts, is essentially a bureaucrat with its interest at heart. Meanwhile, the Master, whose wisdom gave the people peace and security, is left in chains. The Master is betrayed by his emissary.     

There is a common consensus to give credit in the direction of far-right authoritarian personas like Nietzsche, especially towards an author with many contradictions himself. The myth that inspired the title of his book comes from the Valentinian Gnostic sect. McGilchrist rewrote ‘Master and his Emissary’ and added more pages, almost doubling it; one wonders when the writer is free in his wonders of expression, slightly skewed into propaganda. His book expounds on left and right brain imbalance but doesn’t offer a place where solutions in the greater whole can be met. Instead, he doubles down on a predominantly hyper left-brain point of view about needing more right brain.

Art, when marginalised, can lead to mediocre entertainment, and in itself, that speaks for the empire, which has its sets of values to which propaganda and corporatism are used, which eventuate in ‘culture’ used as a tool for the empire. This means that culture as a whole was already taken over by propaganda before waking up, which further reduced culture. One can argue that the same secret clandestine group rebranded itself in Woke to fit modern times. Art and culture as a tool for the empire that embraces the corporatism model, which is inherently structured and organised, has a trickle-down effect as it makes its way into educational institutes. More and more graduates attain a mindset of management of subject […], i.e., the management of art rather than art itself.     

The Industrial Revolution birthed out a new utilitarian system that adopted a pyramidal structure about the elites on top, both of power and our capacity to use our qualities. Their qualities of money, bragging, and self-interest freed them to act normally and use their qualities. However, normal behaviour is not a privilege; the opportunity to use our qualities is not a reward for utilitarian success. This differs from evolutionary natural hierarchical structures and should always be considered separate. It would be a mistake to align evolutionary natural hierarchical structures with the utilitarian systems as the pyramidal structure, as it gives them a sort of get-out-of-jail-free pass. Identifying both modes as the same would open the door for moral absolutes [which is really about religious dogma]. And so any inference to any unjust situation gets brushed off because you can’t criticise those competent enough to run a corporation – they’re just following a natural hierarchy. 

There are always conspiratorial threats by hidden cults whose spiritual fervour aligns with fallen angelic diets that align themselves or are part of that utilitarian corporate structure. This means there is a hidden agenda behind a utilitarian corporate structure. A combination of false individualism, which reflects highly structured corporatism and self-indulgent individualism, is shown on the surface. Behind closed doors is a spiritual fervour of ancient mystery cults, now reconstituted to the chosen one(s) complex to bring about … whatever.               

Art and culture, freed from the utility of corporation and freed from empire as a tool, still have to liberate themselves from the idea of the ‘culture’ that can be given to you by the elites as soon as you reach a specific bourgeois class. Examined from a very conservative political viewpoint, which the Howard government of Australia habituated, a citizenship test [which was really a policy to restrict immigrants] by which the reward would be culture itself. It is a seemingly corporatist endeavour. It is not true that culture is what you get after you get the job, education or even citizenship because culture sits outside such structures. Culture hinges on our imagination and creativity and is at the core of what we are as a civilisation.       

Gnosis, imagination, sense, thinking, and, to some extent, understanding are attributes that lie within us all and, therefore, within society. Balancing while engaging a dynamic tension of movements also helps us realise that we must remain still in one place—the place of our real life and real society—is the tension of seeking—is the act of acting normal.

.

.

Send me an Angel … Send me an Angel … Right Now: 

.

.

---

.

A Certain Shade of Grey [Posted initially on 03rd Decemberr 2022]: In the last post, we discussed some aspects of masonic rituals centred on the Masonic initiations in the Master Mason degree. In the understanding, candidates are taken into the symbolic death of Hiram Abiff. Hiram, the architect of King Solomon’s Temple, also possesses the “Master’s word,” one of the secrets of a Master Mason. Unfortunately, he has a run-in with three ruffians, which would end Hiram’s life. He was buried, then moved and reburied under an acacia tree, and later on, was found by workers. A memorial was erected for him for the loss of the genuine secrets of the master mason; a ritual is founded here, though it’s strange considering the Solomon’s Temple, according to Biblical accounts, Solomon’s Temple had been finished. It’s safe to say the symbolic meaning is not literal, and we’ve established its connections with Osiris.

Before we knew what the “word” was, Hiram represented consciousness; as he was buried, so did our consciousness and the imagination that came with it. W.L. Wilmshurst states, “The grave of Hiram is ourselves; we are the grave of the Master—the lost guiding light is buried at the centre of ourselves.” Hiram represents the higher consciousness that can build the Temple—the complete, integrated Self.  

Our imagination was buried when the world spiritual order, a.k.a New World Order enterprise, injected its symbolic iconography of spheres into the forefront of our imaginal understanding. We must climb out of our symbolic grave to complete the Temple and find our integrated selves. Doing so, or flattening the earth, is a step towards that. It’s inherently more advantageous for protestant Christians as the whole motive of a heliocentric idea was to slow down a protestant movement in Europe. There is a sneaky prediction that if they can garner more acceptances for this abstract, they can reinvigorate a five centuries-old movement. 

However, they follow the same patterns as Evangelicals with proof-texting when they base morality with half a sentence only in this regard, a protestant revival as a reaction to a heliocentric sorcery by the Jesuits. For example, Newton’s works are now only regulated by a specific moment of clarity that brought forth gravity. Furthermore, it implies that his moment of clarity is false. Instead, Newton took inspiration from Hermes in his description of the sun transcribed from the emerald tablets. “Its [the sun’s] force is above all force, for it vanquishes every subtle thing and penetrates every solid thing” – Hermes. You can equate this to gravity, but it’s more ambiguous than that. It’s a weak comparative claim. Protestants set up this claim as a subtext for magical philosophical disdain. For the hermetic axiom “as above so below,” to them, it’s a satanic proposition and, therefore, the whole of hermeticism.      

Protestantism was never abolished, and there has been an anti-Catholic sentiment within conservative Protestants in the first place as a reactionary inheritance of their European counterpart. It’s in the conservative Christian conspiracy sect that imparts the importance of an ethical ideal regarding a unified monotheistic framework. It would seem that this ideal should only favour their type of Christian ethical monotheistic worldview, not a Catholic one since there is already a Christian monotheistic framework. Their whole anti-sentiment ironically goes against monotheism itself. If they ever adopt a flattening earth movement, they’re also advocating for old gods to awake or at least acknowledge angelic worship [good or bad] comes with the territory.      

This stems from a conspiratorial idea that Catholicism [or its institutional managers] doesn’t truly uphold a Christian belief. It secretly worships pagan gods or fallen angelic deities behind its Christian iconography. [There is merit to this, given the vast amount of conspiratorial evidence]. However, it’s more about a hyper-focus on one side of the polarity, the conceptualization of the ‘all good, all-knowing’ to bring heaven down to earth and ignore chaos inherent to our dual nature. Whether dualism dissolves the higher, you raise your conception of good and evil into oneness – I’m not qualified to answer this [at a deeper level] as it raises more ethical questions. But, once you view evil as chaos, synonymous with the underworld that one must climb out of, this understanding would require a reintegration of self and is really what most people can grasp or relate to. This is similar to Jung’s concept of integrating the shadow side.  

The Old Testament gods are neither intelligent nor ethically good, even though they are supposed to have created a morally superior system. The Gnostics do not deny that evil exists but are made aware that the characteristics of the creator-God are always doing things incompatible with knowledge. That upon creation, something went wrong. So it means the higher you raise the conception of good and evil within an oneness philosophy, it would go back to relativism arguments if creation weren’t perfect, to begin with. The Gnostics see this imperfect world in conjunction with the perfect upper Pleroma, and this is your soul’s spiritual aim, the upper Pleroma.    

I once mentioned that the satellite cosmos might be the last false ideological stronghold, and if it breaks down completely, you’re only left with sets of belief systems that are more overt and in plain sight. Instead, they are cleverly hidden and in secret. The latter [satellization cosmos] is one type of secular framework that depowers fallen angel worship because the collective intent has no full potential. You only need to remove the satellized sorcery aspect and reinvoke the original cosmos.     

Otherwise, another theocratic empire with a new zeal for disenchanting a false cosmos would grow. And it would also be a fundamentalist movement, granted every religion has a form of fundamentalism. Fundamentalism is more of a style, and Gnostic groups of their time were reactionary [meaning Gnostics were the fundamentalist of their time]. So I mean reactive movements that are more socially and theologically strict, like Evangelicalism. Because Evangelicalism is a Christian identity rather than a denomination, their conceptual level and understanding of Christianity is more distant, but I also suggest ideologically. The distance factor allowed them to redefine spiritual experiences to an inclusive framework of ‘born again’ spiritual experiences that differ from other awakening spiritual impulses because it’s also an emotional conversion in accepting Jesus Christ as their saviour.     

Not only in the acceptance but also in an interactive sense of God’s presence [God personally communicates with them]. Alongside proselytizing or evangelizing candidates so they can be born again. Fundamentalism is propelled further into the extreme scale when biblical inerrancy [God’s divine words] must be seen without error. However, not all follow this doctrinal purity but still hold the Bible as authoritative. Almost all fundamentalists are evangelicals, but not all evangelicals are fundamentalists.  

Evangelicals shared a common idea with the conservatives [new/neo-conservatives] about the United States being led down the path of ruin through Liberalism that started after the Vietnam War. Evangelicals saw this decline through the ruling class abandoning Biblical values in favour of a destructive doctrine they called ‘secular humanism.’ They agreed with the neo-conservatives about poverty, crime, drugs, the Soviet Union, etc. However, included was a focus on the breakdown of Biblically ordained family structures – and also a disdain for feminism, the legalization of abortion, and a general increase in secularization. Most American Christians are not evangelical Christians, and only 17 per cent [white] Americans are Evangelicals. This small minority had a strong influence in politics that started with Reagan, where an Evangelical and Republican alliance would ensue – a successful pairing because of their loyalties to leaders and their motivation to vote as a religious obligation.

In the latter part of the 80s, Evangelicals, with their broad reach through televangelising, went through scandals. Some of their Evangelical leaders were against what they preached, especially about Biblically ordained family structures [hey, blame it on the sirens]. Most of their funding came through donations, the kinds of donations that were able to fund an evangelical theme park.

The Reagan era also prompted a Christian conspiracy theory culture, starting with talk-back radio and then drifting to early internet chat forums. Where they borrowed evangelicals’ and neo-conservatives’ dislike [not just about Liberalism], but the government itself and their ruling class fundamentally threatening the beliefs and traditions of the American family. The conspiratorial side has some dismay with the government; however, confusingly, most conspiracy-theory mouthpieces alongside evangelicals and neo-conservatives accept their reason for war. And that the Holy Land [Jerusalem] needs to be reclaimed, certain events must come to pass, as stated in the book of Revelation, to hasten the second coming. It must match Biblical revelation’s mandate and any precursor event for the second coming and apocalypse. This makes the Evangelical Right indistinguishable from Christian Zionism, which is favoured more among Republicans. 

Evangelicals certainly didn’t spearhead their complex values. It seemed to just align or overlap with a growing conservative secular ideal in the first place backed by media like Fox News and magazines like National Review [and X-files]. They gave a religious rationalisation that most conservatives may have wanted anyway. At the same time, they can’t mature out of their apocalyptic thinking, contributing to the collapse of civilisation, which is also incongruent with being born again spiritually. However, they set the criterion of religious dogma acting like a map, like an immovable pillar. So when something like a memetic virus [wokeism] would inevitably come around, they repelled it, and it couldn’t have its effect.

They succeeded in the Political arena but lost in the cultural area [and this is due to imagination being stifled]. And now they see themselves as minoritarian. They’ve given up the dream that their worldview can meld with the mainstream American perspective. Even so, their firm stance on policy and low-key scepticism of a ruling-class government would generate a reactionary Christian-conspiracy-theory culture. At the same time, the reactionary majority blame the left as a way to tunnel a type of propaganda [radicalism] into a kind of scapegoating – probably as a way to circumvent their prominent part in the rise of totalitarianism. Which had its ascendency post-911 in the Bush era – the 911 event lifted the veil overtly.

There is always this implied assertion when [traditional and new] Christian-conspiracy-fundamentalists decree a Masonic conspiracy that their Christian institution is somehow separate from that supposed agenda. [Or maybe they’re creating a memetic spell based on ignorance to wash away guilt or sin]. There was a time when evangelical Christianity made a formidable bid to displace Freemasonry. It never came to pass because Trinitarian Joachimism became the principal theoretical instrument for Masonic policy triumphing in the new world. This came about through the foundation of Mormon Freemasonry, focusing on a secularised irenic inaugural leadership within a complex of social institutions and voluntary societies that preserved progressive American civic piety. Mormon Temple rituals, alongside Joachimite’s political inaugural aspects, are symbolically rooted in Royal Arch exaltation.       

The Book of Revelation is an occult document to the dismay of Christian-Conspiracy-fundamentalists who identify occultism with Evangelicalism as a generalised doctrine of demons. It means to advocate the book of Revelation; you must also accept it as an occult scripture. There are coded meaning embedded in it, meaning you can’t take it at surface value. It’s an allegory or a parable with coded messages – perhaps by initiates of mystery cults at the time. It could also be a story to pass on certain information to people with occult knowledge. It is essential because it misses the point when people take it literally. And this often happens with the Bible and other texts from other religions, and people act out that incorrect worldview as one hundred per cent authentic.

Having that in mind, the apocalypse [the second coming and reclaiming of the Holy Land]  might not be literal; it’s less about the end of the world and more about the battle of good and evil that occurs at the heart of every human being. Which is more about the enlightenment process, and this can be apocalyptic in the sense that it destroys what reality is. The second coming of Christ probably means the enlightenment experienced by the individual practitioner; the Christ/Christos energy is born within their own body. And this differs from a born-again proposition as it has an exclusive wall.

Demonic Thought Forms:  We determined that Heliocentrcisim was a Jesuit enterprise first before Freemasonry joined in the cosmic misdirection operation. To clarify, the Enlightenment thinkers [most likely in the Rosicrucian Enlightenment sect] birthed modern [hyperreal] science like heliocentricism, which came from an esoteric impulse. And for a brief period [in my speculation], became or morphed into the Illuminati, another Rosicrucian order [that differed or did not share their brother’s ideology but still helped with the heliocentric concept], a group that didn’t last the eighteenth century. They were supposed to be a counter-reaction to the Jesuit order but may have been co-opted by the Rosicrucian Enlightenment.    

Freemasonry has long been known to historians for its capacity to influence public affairs. Until recently, however, this was thought to be a general shaping of society by individuals impressed with its core principles of liberty and equality – the brotherhood of man and the fatherhood of God. With dwindling and ageing membership, Masonry stands a possible future where it’s nothing more than a repository of esoteric knowledge. While Rosicrucian’s offspring, Theosophy is not a system of thought endowed by a deity; rather, it’s Divine Wisdom within us. Theosophy is a way of answering life’s “big” questions by trying to reconcile the varied approaches of science, philosophy, and religion without limiting themselves to their particular assumptions or ways. Instead, it relies on personages of intuitions and spiritual ecstasy while embracing all that is true and valuable in other approaches.

Having established Masonry and Theosophy’s seemingly innocent business model statements, there is still the same conspiratorial focus of fallen angelic worship behind their seemingly innocent synopses. And this is due to the seriousness of Secret-[State]-Cults’ use of Star Magic. This makes it a complex area to parse; I think there needs to be a separation between angelic worship [watcher cults] and what Chaos is or hellish things in a philosophical and psychological sense. This is because it touches upon a larger philosophical argument – an argument that halters [or reimagines] oneness philosophy about the nature of the phenomenon.

We have these conscious experiences of colour and the shape of tactile pressure, but these phenomena are not the ultimate causes; Kant [a philosopher] was convinced that there was something beyond that. This is reasonable because we don’t control our phenomenon; something out there is generating these sense perceptions and giving them to us. On a synchronistic level, people started having internal relationships with how the logos unfolded. They began to see patterns in how things can unfold and make sense and realise that those patterns had meaning to their reality. Consciousness of reality and reality itself is a co-creating relationship between the symbols that are known to us and the relationship between the subjective and the objective. And there is applied animism, where it’s more intuitive than symbolic. While all of these questions are about the natural aspects and phenomena of the environment, the same must be said for spiritual and paranormal activities [what we call contact].

John Dee, who had links to Rosicrucianism, was an individual the Masons admired since his whole shtick was about Enochian magic. He was inspired by the same memetic and complexity of ideas that we call Christian-Zionism [pre-apocalyptic millenarianism dispensationalism]—had constant contact with angelic beings, and just exactly what kind of Angels were he in contact with? He was famous for his scrying sessions, and at times, he got to a point where he and his colleague would make contact outside of the crystal, meaning contact with angel beings in the physical environment.

John Dee and Kelley moved from London to Prague and tried to convince the Holy Roman Emperor to get on board with what the angels wanted: to help them bring about this new world order and this apocalypse. Weirdly, it angered the Catholic Church, and so the Jesuits tried to trick them into coming to Rome, where they would’ve been tortured and killed. Angels then told them to take all the records of the scrying sessions and destroy them in the fireplace [21 leather-bound books]. So they did, and the Jesuits could not get hold of the records; after they moved on, Kelley was in the house’s garden. I saw an angel moving in the garden with its feet hovering off the ground, and the angel led Kelley up the stairs to the fireplace, where they burnt the documents. Upon their report of seeing a door of light opened at the back of the fireplace, a hand comes out of the door of light and hands them back the destroyed books.     

Whether you believe this story or not, they are projections, a tale that seems to slide between non-fiction and fiction with supernatural experiences of dark entities, angels, etc. They are stories that line up with modern-day fear of external governmental agencies, the Illuminati and Freemasonry with secret conspiracies behind the scenes. That people are out there to get us alongside entities of the spiritual world. The conspiracy is real, but it’s also a demonic thought form and is not an external entity but rather something that is projected inside of us outwards – our fear of that makes it real. Human consciousness allows us to have infinite choices and experiences, and the way of Sharman understands that it’s your choice; you can shift your attention, expertise, or focus, which is true magic, which tends to be what you end up experiencing.   

The Transcendence of Evil: The conspiracy is real but has to whirl between conspiracy and conspiracy theory, so it’s a battle between the two at a propositional level. And both are required to get a resemblance of truth because it’s carried in propositions and results in beliefs, which does not know that. What if you manifest a conspiracy theory that is not true but becomes a conspiracy theory? Due to the misreading of Derrida and Foucault and by attributing them to the claim that the ‘power’ they identify is the central spirit. In other words, into a Satanic adversary, but merely a modified Marxist claim directed through a specific subset of post-war philosophy [post-structuralism, deconstruction] in postmodernism [now neo-Marxist].   

Having been proven wrong and insisting their misinformation is fundamental to the public and not retracting the false claim is an attempt to validate a false conspiracy theory, which becomes a [unintentional] fundamentalist claim and a demonic thought-form. Derrida and Foucault looked at platonic idealism, a.k.a; the philosophy of Plato and Christian meta-physics led to the hierarchy tendency of philosophy. Truth is a vertical journey that starts from the propositional as it moves towards the procedural, then the perspectival, and participatory. Building on this – both were interested in how they used idealism and Christian logic to make absolute claims, like truth and power.         

The acquisition of power was not what Derrida and Foucault were concerned about; to an extent, the analysis of the way power functions and how it functions in society was important to them. Derrida talks about power; however, his method of deconstruction is not a method of gaining power but about undermining claims to constant knowledge – or problematizing trends of acquiring knowledge in Western philosophy. Likewise, Foucault’s work on genealogical history was not about how to gain power; he looked at how power has been used, abused and modified throughout history.

Our relationship to power and the criterion for realness should be appropriately acknowledged rather than made absolute or set up as antithesis. We’ve mentioned the confusion in the order of abstraction in general semantics. When one identifies the word with the label, there is confusion when the label stands for the image or the ‘thing itself – ‘the map is not the territory.’ We can’t capture the relevance of our proposition within the syntax or the semantics of the propositions; that’s the main thing Derrida was about.      

The claim that power is a fundamental reality or culture is about the claim that the drive to power is at the core of Western beings. It is an equally nihilistic claim; it attempts to heal the wound of nihilism but is fundamentally mistaken in its endeavour. It constitutes the wrong way or framing the problem the wrong way. So, you don’t get insight into the solution rooted in the problem. 

Derrida was critical of elements of Western civilisations the same way any philosopher would be – a big part of doing philosophy is looking back historically on the traditions and critically modifying previous assumptions. Descartes [I think therefore I am] developed his form of rationalism, which involved criticising previous assumptions of Western subjectivity – that go back to Plato or Aristotle. It doesn’t mean Descartes is an enemy of Western philosophy; it just means he engages with that tradition. His re-articulation of classical philosophical questions in his era and Derrida’s method [deconstruction] aim for an internal critique, looking for a critique internal to the text itself. Derrida and Foucault wanted to push philosophy beyond a traditionalist, Platonist paradigm and search for a more just and democratic thought.    

To suggest Western governments and universities worldwide are being influenced by people who are followers of Derrida and Foucault [a subset of postmodernism] – a satellited version of postmodernism, a leftist golem. Postmodernism had been framed wrongly. There is no evidence for this, but it’s evident that a particular subset of postmodernism is being used as a strawman, which gives the sorcerer a type of lefty intellectual bogyman to fight against. Essentially, profiteering from the ignorant has such an effect. You even have synchro-mystics proclaiming a notion of post-postmodernism, which there is no need for since the proposition was incorrect to begin with. More evidence suggests that woke-isim and identity politics emerged from the new-atheist movements rather than postmodernism. 

However, in that they’re made aware of their mistakes – there is still the symptomatic problem, and it’s something more profound, more mystical, and, in terms of ages, longer. And it feeds off things like polarised, Hegelian, and dual conflicts. Some call it an Egregore, but it is closer to Steiner’s notion of a cosmic being called Ahriman. Steiner examined that Superstition science [or scientific superstitions] was the illusion and means employed by Ahriman. Humans and their different groups are at odds with each other, as seen in our modern-day political arena. [“These Ahrimanic powers are at work wherever disharmonies between groups’ people arise” – Steiner]. Ordered-liberty-conservative-intellects have done equal damage by miss-framing postmodernism. So there is validation in making aware of the memetic virus [wokeisim] arising [they’re just finger-pointing in the wrong direction], but in doing so, given manifestation to a demon of their own. 

These Ahrimanic powers are at work wherever disharmonies between groups of people arise, but let’s take a very characteristic example to show what most of these things are based upon. Our modern proletariat now looks to Karl Marx; it is worth studying how the teachings of Karl Marx spread among the modern proletariat and how they gave rise to a never-ending flood of Marxist literature. This literature fully embraces the scientific mode; everything is rigorously supported with proof and evidence so rigorously, in fact, that one who thought was immune to Marxism has, in fact, succumbed to it. The fate of Marxism was to spread first of all through the proletariat. At the same time, academic institutes disputed it and rejected it, now there are a number of academics who can no longer resist the logic of Marxism. Who acknowledge and can no longer escape it because Marxist literature, as gradually has become apparent, offers subtly congruent conclusions.   With a modern scientific outlook and motive thinking, the propositions of Marxism can be very nicely proven. The middle classes didn’t have their own Karl Marx to prove the opposite, but it would’ve been possible. You see, just as one can prove the ideological character of law, ethics, etc., and the theory of added value and axioms of materialistic history from a Marxist perspective. So, one can prove exactly the opposite of all such things. It would be perfectly possible for bourgeoisie Marx to prove the opposite in the same rigorous way without distortion or underhand aims. Such evidence would certainly stand because modern human thinking and the modern intellect lie in a stratum of our being that prevents us from reaching down to access realities. A similarly rigorous procedure can prove one thing and its opposite equally well.     Today, it is possible with equally valid logic to prove the truth of spiritualism on the one hand and materialism on the other. These conflicting perspectives merge with equal rights because modern intellectualism lives in an upper Stratham of reality and does not plunge into the depths of existence. The same applies to partisan viewpoints of all kinds. If we do not comprehend this, we absorb such things through our upbringing, family through the particular condition we live in, and the politics of the day. We might honestly believe our partisan view is well founded, yet we have just fallen or slipped into it. We find ourselves in conflict with people who likewise slipped into their own partisan position; both oppositions will be equally valid. This brings chaos and confusion over humanity, and the convulsion it causes will continue to increase if humanity does not come to see this. And in this confusion is something that Ahrimanic powers employ again to prepare their triumphed incarnation. – Steiner

.

Steiner was a Theosophy [post-Blavatsky] student in the German branch but divorced himself from it due to a conflict of interest regarding fellow teacher Krishnamurti. However, Steiner showed indifference towards Theosophy itself, as Blavatsky found Christian doctrines inferior to the wisdom of the East. Steiner was intrigued by the concept of ‘the Christ event’ and was also a natural clairvoyant.

We have early signs of esoteric Christianity formulating in Steiner as he continued to work alongside […] and an unnamed intellect to develop concepts of karma and rebirth.

Steiner’s cosmology also corresponds to the Theosophical view, with its aeons-long perspective on the enfoldment of spirit into matter. Steiner gives more emphasis, however, to the role of superhuman evil in the process. He stresses that long before human incarnation on this planet, the Godhead decided that “humanity certainly could have developed well, but could become even stronger if obstacles were put in its way” – Smoley, R.

.

These obstacles have primarily taken the form of two cosmic beings, Lucifer and Ahriman. We discussed Lucifer at length; that is, not Satan. And the whole Luciferin agenda is not accurate in an empirical sense. However, fallen angel worship [watcher cults] exists in secret through a network that spans the state, country, and empire; the evidence is apparent through hoaxes, false flags, rituals, symbology, secret societies, etc. 

Steiner sees Lucifer as the source of pride and is correct to signify Lucifer with pride because, as we established, the supreme lord of light is Samyaza [the angel of pride] – and Ahriman is the name of evil principle as portrayed in Zoroastrianism. Also, by contrast, Ahriman is responsible for our mechanical ingenuity and technical inventions [Ahriman’s technologies]. In a sense, The God of the Machine Ahriman will incarnate [as an anti-Christ archetype] in this century, as prophesied by Steiner.  

In Baudrillard’s fable, our reality exists only as rotting shreds attached to the map; this is the state of our age, according to Baudrillard. So that the model itself is likened to human existence, the real has become irrelevant and undefinable and clings only as vestiges. In a sense, Ahriman is the glue when we cling to the map, and in contrast, Lucifer [Samyaza] would have us leave this world all too soon.  

Neither Lucifer nor Ahriman is adversarial; instead, one feeds off the other in the sense there is a Lucifer of light and false light Lucifer. The Ahriman impulse utilises false light and left brain thinking; now we have Ahriman’s technologies or Ahriman’s artificial intelligence. There is no doubt that the notion of artificial intelligence, where it will come to life as a sentient being with form and a soul, will never be realised. They are often romantic babblings of pseudo-science and the elites who finance them because of their innate fear of the uncertain, judgement or death.     

We have Ahriman incarnating in Ghost in the Shell as project 2501 [Puppet Master], a sentient beyond A.I. intelligence but rather a living thinking entity born in a sea of information. It’s archetypically angelic, and you see the drawings sliding between femineity and masculinity.

.

There is a dichotomy in mainstream science for the evaluation of spirit – and also in the psychological philosophy when discussing the good and the bad spirit. However, that dichotomy can answer what science won’t delve into and how we understand evil. For example, Carl Jung states – in his red book about the boy:

In any form the archetype of the spirit appear in situations he is never 100 percent certain that the spirit figure in dreams are morally good, often they appear not only ambivalent, but dam right malicious, who knows about the great plan, and how much evil is necessary to bring about the good by enantidromia and which good tend to want evil … wait and see.

.

So, on the way to profound and real religious experience, the human being is not simply made with already-made desires and solutions but is …

Confronted with the problem with uncertainty of moral evaluation with the confusing interplay of the good and bad, and the inexorable con-cassanation of guilt, suffering and redemption. And this way is right, but how many can recognize it; it is the old voice sounding from a distance, it is ambiguous, doubtful and dark, and sometimes means danger and risk an uncertain path, one can only take for the sake of by the wheel of God, without security and without sanction.

.

It means the experiences of the non-physical world are different; this can be shown in dreams and visions of our reality. They often involve ambivalent experiences of light and dark interacting in weird ways; this engagement of interacting with spirits is not a series of episodes but a process. Jung divided this process into three: war – magic – and religion. First, war is a conflict between right and left, between the morally acceptable and morally unacceptable and so forth, then magic, a period of transformation, the magical change, then religion, moving into the ultimate source, the god within. 

The psycho-spiritual transformation of the psyche is akin to the enlightenment, which involves contact with light. Moreover, it also touches upon the notion of Henosis [what postmodernists were touching upon]. The summation of the neo-platonic ascent is that the one within you becomes one within, one without until there is only one. The ultimate one-ment and atonement, the ultimate healing of that which is existentially distressing to us, separated from the ground of reality within and without and separating them.

.

.

Send me an Angel … Send me an Angel … Right Now: 

.

.

---

.

Decoding Masonic Symbols [Posted initially on 06th November 2022]: In some of my previous posts relating to Kabbalah, we discussed fundamentalists’ naïve look on Kabbalah mysteries, where there is an attempt to separate a doctrine that they believe is incompatible with their type of Christianity. They are unconscious in their disgust; its position is more gnostic than good and evil. They’re stuck in that Zoroastrianism apocalyptic thinking, light versus the dark, the good angels versus the bad ones, and so forth. The Christ Savior versus the pagan gods – this assumption stems from the belief that the creator God sent His Son, Christ, to Earth. In this view, God becomes man so that man can become like God. Traditional Christians can only relate to the highest of the lower aeons – the creator God. Therefore, the creator God merely assumes the role of Sophia. If Sophia indeed sent Christ, it suggests that the creator God is taking credit without doing the actual work. Consequently, the traditional Christian view of spiritual dualism or conflict begins from a misleading starting point.

So, to claim other pre-Christian movements are incompatible with their Christianity, you would have to first step out of your main rigid framework or worldview of Christianity – to make that claim truly. And when we have a co-creating facility that invokes intuition, which can be magical and significant to occultism and an ever-changing holographic universe. It’s impossible for them – they can’t go beyond their framework, meaning that thinking beyond the firmament should never be considered. The co-creating facility uses the language of the spirit, and the spirit of our age embeds itself in our reality. It can be found in pop culture, where those symbols are manifolded to return to Jewish and Christian esotericism.

Separating a doctrine that Christians believe is incompatible with their type of Christianity would also mean dismissing history altogether. And it’s in history where we find that Christianity was not deterring itself from esoterica. It was them doing all the appropriating. The concept of Prisca Theologia is the doctrine that a single, true theology exists where a single theme coincides with all other religions. The underlining factor would be through a God passing knowledge down to a series of prophets. Christianity would appropriate Hermetic teachings where Hermes Trismegistus would get the theologia badge of the prophet but is also thrice great [1. Enoch, 2. Noah, and 3. Hermes]. 

Fundamentalists and traditional Christians don’t want to acknowledge that Freemasonry is also Christianity. Freemasonry inherently seeks mystery knowledge, and at the core of the initiations hierarchy, Enoch stands as a Master Mason. Kabbalah had to be acknowledged as the Book of Enoch declares Enoch a perfect man with virtue, received God’s name when he walked with him in heaven – as he beheld the Tree of Life, a reference to the Kabbalah. The ten Sephirot is the emanation of the divine attributes of God, including his name.       

Kabbalah scholars have identified ten Sephirot columns on the left side of the Tree of Life: the column of severity, and the right is the column of mercy and the middle column of equilibrium. In Freemasonic symbolism [and Christianity], their columns are pillars, which are representations of the pillars of Enoch, which has an association with Masonic symbolism, given there are three pillars also present in their symbolic representation.

How often do years hear political leaders deploy a pronouncement to their speech “New World Order” [a conspiratorial romantic term to describe Globalism] may perhaps go back as far as the Protestant Reformation. Martin Luther had a mistrust of imperial power. Still, he also attached his Reformation project movement to an implied adversary or adoration [I’m not quite sure which] of a demon, “The Prince of Darkness-Grim”, that one day will rule. The implication is to mean the Tridentate (Council of Trent), and their initiatives were to restore a papal monarchy along with the Catholic alliance through the structure of the Jesuit Order’s doctrine by adapting Egyptianate-Christianity in the form of a world spiritual order.    

And will then be rebranded as the New World Order – after they aligned themselves with a global Masonic lodge with a new zeal for science and a solar hegemonic brotherhood – where [metaphorical] light will lead the way into a deistic one-world government. An occult theocracy will rule that. All foretold in a prophecy by a Christian mystic Joachim of Fiore – where in the Third Age of the Holy Spirit within, a universal monarch would rule through two new orders of spiritual men. 

The foundation may come from something religious and ancient inherent to any empire-building model. Still, the modern outlook uses criminal capitalism, war and technocracy inside a globalist model, and this model is crumbling. So, by acknowledging the collapse of globalism, you’re also [at least on an unconscious/subconscious level] flattening the world. 

To make this prophecy come to fruition, they had to change people’s worldview, changing the asymmetrical notion of science and inverting it to something symmetrical like scientism. Copernican theory provided the means to affect such a layered strategy. Nicolaus Copernicus and his contemporaries plagiarised Claudius Ptolemy’s belief that Earth was the centre of the universe and merely swapped Earth for the sun. What we know as Egyptian pantheon mythologies of gods becomes a pantheistic suffusion of nature [into spherical material].

Freemasonry would soon embrace heliocentric theology [and this is critical, as the heliocentric idea was already in place, and they agreed to go along with the plan]. The Royal Arch degree is known as the Royal Arch of Enoch (or Solomon). Solar emblems and images would be turned into spheres where the sun would be central to their religiousness, and ancient mysteries had to be reconfigured to fit heliocentrism.

The underground vault preserved the Enochian drama and lost wisdom. Enoch, who had an angelic-divine vision, is seen as a patriarch who did not die a physical death but was transported directly into heaven by God. And because of this, he became [a paragon of supreme Masonic initiation, and his achievement was preserving all wisdom and knowledge in the face of a comprehensive flood (of Noah) or rec-creation]. – Robert W Sullivan M, Esq.

Enoch stood as an intermediary between bad angels and good angels. He was also gifted by God’s Archangels’ celestial divine secrets, and the Angel Raphael would instruct him on the ways of Kabbalah – as well as learning about ‘demonic’ angels known as the Watchers. The Old Testament acknowledges that Enoch didn’t die a physical death as God took him in. The book of Enoch describes his return to earth – and upon his return, according to masonic legend and philosophy – Enoch inscribed the heavenly and celestial knowledge he received onto two pillars. 

Enoch inscribed his messages in two pillars so that they may survive the flood – hoping to restore the messages inscribed in those pillars. The Lost Word and the Royal Arch are ritually symbolised as described in the pillars. The vault was said to have been built by Noah [Enoch’s great-grandson]; Noah commissioned his son Methuselah to build this underground temple to house the nine vaults. The Enochic vault was constructed under Mount Moriah, and in each vault, he placed a golden delta [triangle] containing the ineffable name of Deity. [The Vault of Enoch was discovered by builders of the second temple; within the vault, under nine arches found the Pillars of Enoch and the Lost Word symbolised by the Ark of the Covenant – Robert W Sullivan M, Esq]. The two pillars standing in front of Solomon’s Temple are a symbolic restoration of the original pillars, Jachin and Boaz. In 1 Kings 15-22a (MSG)

15-22 First he cast two pillars in bronze, each twenty-seven feet tall and eighteen feet in circumference. He then cast two capitals in bronze to set on the pillars; each capital was seven and a half feet high and flared at the top in the shape of a lily. Each capital was dressed with an elaborate filigree of seven braided chains and a double row of two hundred pomegranates, setting the pillars off magnificently. He set the pillars up in the entrance porch to The Temple; the pillar to the south he named Security (Jachin) and the pillar to the north Stability (Boaz). The capitals were in the shape of lilies.

.

On the left panel: We have a panel that shows two pillars described in the Biblical text Jachin and Boaz – a representation of the pillars that stood before Solomon’s temple – a reference to Enoch’s Pillars that he inscribed his messages. The pillars also represent the star constellation Gemini, which sits at the gate leading from the Ecliptic to the Celestial Plane [Milky Way], often described as a [Nile] river, and as such to the Royal Arch and ultimately to the Garden. 

On the middle panel: We have a staircase to the Arch in the checkerboard image [the first image above the three panels]. The staircase is a ladder with three people [three maidens or three graces, the winter triangle] on it, representing the three degrees in Masonry, the rituals found in the Blue Lodge or Craft Masonry. The ladder is often associated with Jacob’s/Minerva’s ladder; the ladder also means to reach the highest peak of a mountain [Holly Mountain or Meru]. It’s public that there are no real secrets within these pre-Masonry lodges. The image depicts that the higher you are on the ladder [, the higher the degree], the closer you get to the Blazing Star. The right panel depicts a guardian as a courtesy service as you enter your next level.      

In the right panel, We have the satellized cosmology, the iconographic spheres [representing world spiritual order or new world order] sitting on top of two pillars. People assumed it was our cosmic map, but it symbolises paradoxical sorcery. Between the two spheres and above the arch, we have a ladder with 3,4,5 written on it. It is the number used in the Pythagorean Theorem in constructing right triangles – an emblem of the Worshipful Master [this symbol is always found in the checkerboard depictions; it’s found under the wisdom pillar in the image as mentioned earlier above]. Pythagoreans believed that divinity was found in mathematics. And we have the All-Seeing Eye inside a keystone reminiscent of a Sapphire that sits on the vault of the sky [dome] shaped like a throne in Ezekiel’s description.      

The middle panel also shows the staircase to the Arch [depicted on the left] is an artist’s rendition of the Ark of the Covenant displayed on the right [the modern rendition did away with the vault and instead used a symbol like a Triangle]. The vault is depicted [on the right] by illustrator Laurence Dermott [1783]. The pentagram suggests that Sirius and Isis, who possess the secret name Amun Re/Ra, are necessary to raise Osiris. Masonic ritual parallel raising Osiris motif the candidate is raised from the grave with a substitute word. This is initialised using five pentagram points forging a nexus to Sirius and Isis and  Hiram Abif as Osiris. 

Unlike the ritual, however, the contents of the Vault of Enoch were not the Ark of the Covenant. Instead the degree certificate displayed a rising sun emerging from the vault as the symbol for the Tetragrammaton symbolically detailing the solar pathway of initiation for citizens that would ultimately be codified in the York Rite or American Rite ending in the Christian Knight Templary of DeWitt Clinton organized in 1814; St. Andrew’s Royal Arch Lodge was the first in the United States to confer the degree of Knight Templar in 1769. – Robert W Sullivan M, Esq.

.

The crux and understanding of Freemasonic symbolism are centred on Sun and Enoch. Apollo represents their iconic sun, God. He is often depicted riding a solar Chariot of the Merkabah, reminiscent of Ezekiel’s vision of the throne chariot of God. The Chariot is driven by four living creatures [an ox, man, lion, and eagle], which are also astrological symbols: the four fixed signs of the Zodiac. Apollo, the Sun God [also called Helios], travels through the middle of the four seasons. The four signs of the Zodiac also represent the four elements [Taurus – earth, Scorpio – water, Leo – fire, and Aquarius – air] as well as the four great royals [Regulus in Leo – North, Fomalhaut in Aquarius – south, Antares in Scorpio – west, and Aldebaran in Taurus – east] – and above the stars in the firmament, which the Jewish Encyclopaedia defines as a “vault or expanse of the sky”, a dome.  

Then I looked, and, behold, in the firmament [“vault or expanse of the sky”, a dome] that was above the head of the cherubims there appeared over them as it were a sapphire stone, as the appearance of the likeness of a throne.” (Ezekiel 10:1)

.

The Arch is also a Dome: And that’s because round forms suggest wholeness and are architecturally strong, and many Church buildings built with a Dome are called temples of the sun. The image in the middle depicts a keystone on the Arch Dome, a Wedge-shaped stone inserted at the top of the Arch – the keystone is also the throne. It’s also a reflection of a Master’s degree. The dome or vault of the sky described by many ancient cultures (Egyptians, Chinese, Greeks) considered the sky a solid dome – that the sun transverses or “sits upon” daily.

[To be considered only]: A theoretical assumption … using logic made evident through mythical texts, which comes to impart through the notion of flattening the earth (in conjunction with the collapse of Globalism). Nebuchadnezzar’s vision hints that the angels wanted the great tree cut down. Perhaps so that a dome could be lowered to contain the cubits of waters we came to know as the flood, and then it was raised up again. Ezekiel’s notion of wheels within wheels describes the dome-like layer; let’s call it a membrane. A membrane within a membrane moves in conjunction, and the sun and moon sit on them but move independently. It means the planes of existence are infinite, but the membrane acts as containment [that moves up and down when needed] but predominately resides above the stratosphere. 

	The rings or rims of the wheels were so vast, that when put in motion the prophet was afraid to look upon them. – Ezekiel 1
	The firmament above was a crystal, glorious, but terribly so. That which we take to be a dark cloud is to God clear as crystal, through which he looks upon all the inhabitants of the earth.  – Ezekiel 1

.

There are as many membranes as their soul garments [planets] planets that act like bright burning fluid states with natural morphing geometric patterns within them and sit on the membrane. There are separate membranes for Zodiac fixtures and a membrane for the celestial plane called the Milky Way [not a galaxy, no such thing]. God is the keystone of the firmament but is never above it because Wisdom Sophia made that throne for Him above it all.

The Arch symbolically parallels the sun as it traverses its path within the vault of the sky. And the plane beneath; However, the Arch precisely refers to the Dome. So we have Enoch being introduced as a patriarch embedded in the Royal Arch as a paragon initiate and a symbol of antediluvian patriarchal order surviving Noah’s Flood. In the Masonic tradition, Hiram built a temple for King Solomon, and Hiram possessed the word of Master Mason – the word Tetragrammaton, which is necessary to complete the Temple. Before he could finish the Temple, three fellow craftsmen [called the three ruffians] conspired to extract the word from Hiram and killed Hiram in the process. The word of a Master Mason becomes lost within the Blue Lodge – you can see how this parallel Sirius possesses the secret name of Amun Re/Ra to raise Osiris.

Hiram was commissioned to build the “Sea,” an immense round basin of cast metal, but he died before completing it. Astrologically speaking, the Sea is represented as being set on twelve bulls, corresponding to the sign of Taurus. Hiram symbolises Osiris, who was meant to construct a temple. Osiris acts as the gate’s guardian, and this temple is significant as a cosmic dome—a temple of the Dome/Sun. The Sea he intended to build is depicted as the Milky Way, which connects to the dome in a celestial arch. The “lake of stars” is the pathway to Sirius, also known as the Blazing Star. Hiram constructed the Temple of the Dome within a Dome so that King Solomon could transcend time and return to the Garden, which is associated with Cepheus, the Gardener—the northern pole of the celestial dome.

You have to wonder what type of ideological threat Christian-fundamentalist-conspiracy-theory types are reacting to, and at the same time, upholding an isolated pure Christian ethic free from its own history and Christian symbolism. Perhaps it’s an extreme fondness for a Sabbatarian order and the principles of Trinitarian Joachimism, and even that it comes from somewhere. They can wish for it, but it can never be established for a country [United States] with no real history. Trinitarian Joachimism is what made Christian revelation possible through a Cabalistic lens. Even among traditional Christian Truthers, they have to give themselves a sort of stamp of Christian approval before they examine outside texts that didn’t make Biblical canon, like the book of Enoch. They call it synchronised Biblically endorsed extra-Biblical text. 

The term “Tetragrammaton” is symbolised through four representations of the Tree of Life symbol, the Sephirot. This symbolism reflects the concept of four worlds, indicating that four Trees are at the universe’s foundation. These four trees are interconnected at the same root. Together, these four trees represent half of the polarity, which suggests that there are eight trees. By splitting the Tree symbol into two parts—the first half representing the box—and then recombining these parts from the bottom to the top, we create the vectors needed for a tetrahedron and an octahedron. These vector lines combine to form a star tetrahedron. We obtain eight-star tetrahedrons by connecting the eight trees by their branches, ultimately generating a 64-tetrahedron grid.

The term “Tetragrammaton” is symbolised through four representations of the Tree of Life symbol, the Sephirot. This symbolism reflects the concept of four worlds, indicating that four Trees are at the universe’s foundation. These four trees are interconnected at the same root. Together, these four trees represent half of the polarity, which suggests that there are eight trees. By splitting the Tree symbol into two parts—the first half representing the box—and then recombining these parts from the bottom to the top, we create the vectors needed for a tetrahedron and an octahedron. These vector lines combine to form a star tetrahedron. We obtain eight-star tetrahedrons by connecting the eight trees by their branches, ultimately generating a 64-tetrahedron grid.

They said there were ten Sephirot in one tree because they’re hooked at the same centre [root], called the crown [where God goes towards infinity]. It does not count – this is why there are nine Sephiroth per Tree. If you have eight trees and 9 Sephirot per tree, 8 x 9 is 72 [72 is a significant number in the Bible].  The Sephirots are pathways to creation, and the 64 tetrahedron is the Tetragrammaton.

.

.

Send me an Angel … Send me an Angel … Right Now:  

.

.

---

.

The Implicit Conspiracy Truth about the Fallen Angels [Posted initially on 21st October 2022]:  In the last post, we implied [briefly] the very real implication that Blavatsky might be seen today as a sort of 19th-century L. Ron Hubbard. This might be a crude comparison, given the apparent contrast that Hubbard is a product of theosophical influences. But, on the other hand, Theosophy had derived some inspirational ideas from science/fantasy-fictional stories by Bulwer-Lytton’s novels, particularly The Last Days of Pompeii, Zanoni, and The Coming Race – for her own Isis Unveiled (1877). Also, Blavatsky’s vast synthesis of science, religion, and philosophy, The Secret Doctrine (1888), also drew on Bulwer-Lytton. For example, in seeing vril as a new designation for a “terrible sidereal Force” known to the ancients, and by the turn of the century, Bulwer-Lytton’s title phrase had assimilated into Theosophical discussions of the imminent coming race to be revealed with the new cosmic cycle.    

The fictional mode of symmetry [meta-fiction – fiction – non-fiction] that tries to work its way through the asymmetry is a way to re-tool the notion of fiction. And that’s because, in some ways, fiction can become the most profound form of [ethical] abstraction, a meta-truth rather than a falsehood. Blavatsky saw the multiplicities of possibilities through the lens of the spirit, ethics, truth, etc. Therefore, those lenses become the defining tool [ethic] to extract even factual information from the infinite array of information that presents itself to us – and also not to forget Campbell’s methodologies and functions of myth. 

So, Vril’s many concepts are the same as those of the Watchers’ Apocrypha stories. The rediscovery of the Book of Enoch from Lord Bruce had a specific masonic directive; they believed Enoch was the first Mason and wanted to create new mythos for Enoch. And it resulted in a fictional tale that is ‘Vril’ authored by Lytton, which had a meta-fiction [apocrypha texts] quality to it, and without [the Apocrypha sentiment], you don’t even have the pre-condition for non-fiction/facts. So, though stylistically, it’s written as fiction, it has a symmetrical, timeless quality.  

In their statements and writings, Blavatsky’s successors, Annie Besant and Alice Bailey, gave hints of a conspiracy of worship. Annie Besant’s race theory and spiritual change would be part of her Theosophical writings; she admired Bulwer-Lytton. She believed that an occult hierarchy [secret societies who worship the watchers] was directing world history according to a Great Plan and, like Bulwer-Lytton, saw the present age as a “transition period” in which the first signs of the new race began to emerge. Annie Besant’s version of the “coming race” has theosophical overtones; it was to grow out of the Aryans and would be characterised by higher psychic faculties and faith in Reason. Aryans refer to the fifth root race [meaning present humans as an Aryan root race] in contrast to the fourth, Atlantean and the Lemurian. It also means developing a type of consciousness or principles of consciousness.

The underground city that housed the Vril Society is the antithesis to Atlantis, and other science-fiction writers invoke Agartha. The city stood apart from Atlantis as the author wanted to define a more robust republic. His novel “The Power of the Coming Race” describes an underground race of superhuman angel-like creatures and their mysterious energy force, Vril, an “all-permeating fluid” of limitless power. The story goes that the people, called Vril-ya, can control this energy source with their minds to do good and destroy. The story is as follows: they’re filling the inside of the Earth and about to come out onto the surface looking for new real estate. And, of course, the pesky humans will have to be destroyed before they can build their terrestrial civilisation. 

Alice Baily believed that the watchers [described in Enoch; fallen Angels who lusted for human women] were sinless/purists of angels and decided to become martyrs to bring about the great divine plan of evolution. They sacrificed themselves [as they descended from their sinless and free state of existence to develop full divine awareness upon earth, through the medium of material incarnation and the use of the principle of mind” –Alice Baily]. She believed that the divine plan emanated from God’s mind and that watcher [fallen] angels that sacrificed themselves were the good angels [the lords of sacrifice]. Their descent to earth was by the decree of God. So they could bring humankind to the state of angels. They gave and taught humankind’s technology; they mated with human females, after which giant hybrids roamed the earth. She also believed that those of orthodox [Abrahamic faiths] were incongruent with God’s demand. She adores the tremendous solar Angel Samyaza [the real Lucifer or Satan] as she sees him as the honest Christ who sacrificed himself so that man might be. – secretsunblog.com 

The archetypal dominance in fiction that we see in superheroes like Marvel’s Eternals is a modern conception of the Watchers seen as heroes – and we’ve mentioned the fictional modes of symmetry. We can also see how that mode can work within how we filter our worldviews. For example, an imperial worldview after its conquest enables or facilitates a certain kind of relationship with extra-dimensional beings because it relativises previous frameworks as satanic. There is a particular fundamentalist approach to this; also, it may just be swapping one demon for another, and that other might not even be a demon when you consider the original steward of that culture. 

Baily has indicated her reverence for the fallen angels, especially towards the solar angel Samyaza [people incorrectly know it as Lucifer]. Still, she also tries to normalize ethics by squeezing a heroic model in the solar angel archetype. In reality, no one can live their lives through the model of a martyr; to do so is hero worship, and all you do is marginalize ethics. And I don’t mean this in a Biblical sense since that’s also the whole Jesus structure [and even then, it’s impossible to follow Jesus in that way]. We become passive through the obsession with heroes in a non-fiction historical setting or even a fictional one. 

The Aryans are the theosophical notion of super-humans as an evolution. Therefore, it’s (our or) we are ‘coming race’ – and then there are the other types, either Hyletics or Psychics, earthbound materialists looking for a shortcut. At times, with the help of the Watchers, these meta-fictional beings of Angels [now disincarnate demonic entities] who dwell underground [or hollow earth], and to them, these beings are regarded as heroes and technically superior that give technological knowledge to whoever that will barter their soul.     

We’ve mentioned once before that in other aspects of studies, the Watchers came to earth through portals or gateways that took place in Babylon, and we know Babylon means ‘Gateway of the Gods.’ And the land of the Watchers refers to the Biblical name for the city ‘Shinar,’ a city where Egyptians originated. They also refer to the city as the land to which the gods came to Egypt. They also refer to Watchers as Anunnaki beings from Nibiru [or Planet Nine] – and are said to be transcribed in the Book of the Dead. It’s safe to say any notion of planets is a modern misconception, given its hyperreal ideal. A better fit that Scholars had originally denoted those from heaven [or stars] who came to earth. As transcribed in the Dead Sea Scrolls, it is said that 200 fallen angels fell to earth and were chained to everlasting darkness until judgment. 

In a Gnostic cosmic map, I see it as a fractal archetypal key moment in history that repeats the same cosmological need or objective that the Demiurge has himself. And that is to reach or wish to be among the Aeons in the highest Pleroma. However, he cannot do that, so He attempts to rectify that through types of cosmic loopholes. Alienated as He is, and sometimes called the Alien God, He is resentful and jealous – He is only the highest of the lower Aeons, above Saturn. However, it’s still heavenly, as orthodox Christians would understand. This would mean the Watchers [fallen angels] and their cult of worshippers’ great plan for the watchers is to get back to Stars/heaven so they can be by their creator-god’s side. They seek to free themselves from the underworld and be among the highest realm within the lower Aeon. They believe they can achieve this through rituals and technology that must coincide with the archetypal cosmic play of the stars’ astrological [or constellations].         

In ancient Babylon, they built a tower that they thought could reach the heavens, which parallels modern-day attempts to reach God via rockets because they believed a primeval space god existed. It was part of that cosmic plan, from the worship of gods to the worship of angels to the modern worship of aliens. Alien abductions [including manufactured alien abduction and MK-Ultra] and hybridization are those attempts for that cosmic loophole. Their tampering and probing of the human body [genome] are the literal searches for that Spark, our divinity, our soul that links us to the True God.

In my previous post, we discussed Lucifer’s light and the emergence of the imaginal technocracy, exploring how potential alien circuitry has influenced modern technologies like CPUs, computers, and artificial intelligence. The technocratic giants who finance and profit from this technological surge, along with other elites and a powerful, unified secret government worth billions, drive society toward a future shaped by social engineering that undermines our freedom. We have noted that these individuals can be seen as part of a State Cult, spanning both the left and the right. Although no evidence supports their connections with angelic cults, their objectives align similarly. So, what is the link between angelic worship and their underlying desires?

There is a desire for immortality and a struggle with the implications of mortality. So, the ‘coming race’ parallels with post-singularity trans-humans. Transhumanism [a non-science] is the idea for the rich to transfer their consciousness to an artificial intelligence form [whatever that may be] to be immortal. The term is about transforming the human body/race from an ancient impulse. The internal longing for immortality, along with the fear of death – is externalised as a fear of death for our culture and their empire. And the same motivation exists with Cern to set up a stairgate for the appearance of entities.

This idea of escaping death is used to escape judgment and to perceive this imaginal – like a futurist eschatology – Inside an imaginal technocracy paradigm to promote an imagined technological artefact. Such a notion can never really exist in non-fiction, and in this disappointment shared when the fundamentalist types can’t live long enough to see their obsession with the rapture and the second coming. In the epic tale of Gilgamesh, He makes an impossible journey to the underworld to gain the secret of eternal life – only to refuse it at the end and by rejecting the myth of immortality. He accepted that tragedy is only bearable if we make ourselves conscious.

Those [watcher/angelic worshippers] are so far from being conscious of death and so jealous that it mirrors the Demiurge’s jealousy. Like how elites might see normal people or peasants as having the light of enlightenment [the proper illumination, as it were] and cannot fathom why they don’t. And so endeavour to seek it through other means [a shortcut / cosmic loop-hole] through technology because they have all the finances in the world. And even then, it will fail because the True-God isolates the chosen ones.   

Take, for instance, Crowley’s obsession with his mortality [which drove him mad]: We discussed in ‘Watcher’s Dark Heralds Post’ (31) Aleister Crowley’s alien cult [watcher cults / alien cults] – a group who always tried to communicate through the abyss via gateways and portals. Whether he created a literal Vortex is up for debate; perhaps it was more about bringing an entity into this world. The ritual used was transcribed in ‘The Amalantrah Working’ – the first attempts he made contact with a being called ‘Lam.’ In a second attempt, Crowley, along with Jack Parsons and L. Ron Hubbard, conducted a ritual and tried to connect with the spirit of Babalon [Scarlet Woman]. They believed they succeeded, and Siren’s herald Babalon’s spirit still roams.

We have to recognise the difference between the deformed version of seeking super-human abilities [superpowers] via technology, rituals, and magic(k) and the very real notion of spiritual enlightenment [the real superpower attainment]. Somehow, their version of spiritual levelling up always has signs of demonic interruptions [take, for instance, the left eye is always wonky, the left-hand path; their consciousness shifting is weird]. So, if the appeal is to reach apotheosis with the appendages of these entities, there will be some drawbacks.

Assassinate The Siren: Annie Besant noted a great plan to which an occult hierarchy was directing world history; it’s safe to assume it’s a cult that worships the fallen angelic beings. At the start, we said we had to re-tool the notion of fiction so you could derive a meta-truth. Are we to accept that there is such a thing as a Luciferian agenda or a conspiracy? [We dismissed it as Christian conspiracy paranoia] due to Lucifer having no bearing on being Satan. And so, Satan should be associated with Samyaza instead. Are we to ask Alice since Alice is in Wonderland? Alice Baily all but made it self-evident within those remarks, and further elaborated by Blavatsky:

In this case it is but natural – even from the dead letter standpoint – to view Satan, the Serpent of Genesis, as the real creator and benefactor, the Father of spiritual mankind. For it is he who was the “Harbinger of Light,” bright radiant Lucifer, who opened the eyes of automation created by Jehovah, as alleged; and he who was the first to whisper: “in the day ye eat thereof ye shall be as Elohim, knowing good and evil” – can only be regarded in the light of a Saviour. – The Secret Doctrine (p.243)

.

The fallen angelic cults follow Demiurges’ objective to keep us in a simulacrum reality of their making and bind knowledge for all humanity. And this is brought about through his agents who set levels of hierarchies, which are garnered through people’s choices that often lead to blind submission to authority. People that play their roles so blindly to a point they become trapped in their construct, which has a habit of influencing people’s minds to rigid thinking that gives purpose to institutionalized control.

Fallen angelic cults pursue the objectives of the Demiurge, aiming to keep us trapped in a simulated reality of their design while restricting knowledge for all humanity. This is achieved through their agents, who establish hierarchies that influence people’s choices, often leading to blind submission to authority. Individuals who accept these roles without question may find themselves trapped in this construct, which fosters rigid thinking and reinforces institutionalised control.

It’s a Gnostic idea that the Creator-God sent Angels to pollute human souls, and the Cults that worship them are making this happen. And this makes them an enemy of the Orthodox God that’s infallible, all good, and all love. Although they may not entertain the idea, to begin with, the pattern of fractions is there, and like water, they will find the surface. The spiritual war signified by Christian conspiracy theory [and orthodoxy] is closer to an internal struggle. As a counterbalance, a creator God, who, according to Blavatsky’s successors, was by His decree, the fallen angels fell to earth. And by His demand, also sent his favoured angels to wage war on the fallen ones; both at his behest, is He a fickle God? The notion of spiritual war is over; we’re just waiting for Christians to wake up. The Apocrypha texts never made it into the Biblical canon, but you can equate these dualities of good and evil in Cain and Abel. The Watchers [are made physically through real-life cults that worship them] are co-partners with the Demiurge, whereas the Demiurge is Jehovah, unfavourable to the Gnostic Christians.     

The notion of ascending the fallen angelic beings back  to the stars is offset by a very gnostic idea known as in dwelling of the old spirit, mentioned in Saint Paul: First Ephesians 1:30:

17

That the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give to you the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of Him,

.

The Holy Spirit is Sophia, and Christ became Sophia for us. Sophia means the Son of God is born in the flesh, and he died, and the spirit is here. So, we live in a world where the disembodied spirit of Christ is recruiting human helpers to restore the garden. At the same time, it’s still tainted by the disembodied spirits of the old gods [pagan religions that kept remixing themselves], much like the reboots of superheroes or watcher archetypes. So, we have our meta-hero, Christ, a fictional hero, Eternals, and a non-fiction hero, Gilgamesh, the first tragic hero.

It’s clear that the Holy Spirit co-created and inspired some Biblical words. Christians have a complicated relationship with that book because the God of the Old Testament is a jealous God. Christ comes from a completely different place. If you open your heart and mind and read John Chapter Eight, it describes him as an alien from another world who became a human and is now a spirit with us and is still here. That’s the post-Pentecostal event in John 20:22. 

Sophia means Wisdom and the word Theosophy combines the Greek words ‘theos’ and ‘Sophia.’ Theosophy is not a system of thought endowed by a deity; it’s Divine Wisdom within us. In Christianity, it’s called Prisca Theologia, ‘the ancient thought about divine matters’. It has also been called Wisdom Tradition, Perennial Philosophy, Secret Doctrine, and Ancient Wisdom. Theosophy differs from Theosophical Society as the latter functions more as an institutional [religion]. And I venture to guess that the society and Blavatsky’s successors invoke that Watcher-cult suggestion, and less so Blavatsky. 

It needs to be clarified whether she thought Vril was real or was using popular fiction to promote and articulate her ideas (assuming for the sake of argument that she was sincere in her beliefs). Added in that the claim that it stems from Enoch texts, and through the process of elimination, regarding archetypal key-frames/moments in that contextual idea of ‘the coming race’ compared to Enoch texts, then it must be true, or it’s a meta-truth. And no credibility should be lost when focusing on this narrow part of Blavatsky’s extensive work. She does adopt many influencers, although most of her work resides towards her claim of having access to adept masters. Helena Blavatsky states:

The name vril may be a fiction; the Force itself is a fact doubted as little in India as the existence itself of their Rishis, since it is mentioned in all the secret works. – The Secret Doctrine (1888):

.

The Coming Race is meant to be understood as a Darwinian threat, and Blavatsky’s London industrial landscape affected a reactionary impulse towards mysticism and occultism. There was also this indecisiveness to lean towards a stringent Abrahamic Religion and a growing atheistic nihilistic theology, so Theosophy emerged. All the pieces that feed into our current worldview of Darwinism are still there [although you can sense its waning] alongside our concurrent anthropological views, all feed into this contemporary ideal. That enables extremism on polarised ends and extra/alien/angelic/watchers [these archonic (arche)types] to emerge. From wherever these things come from, the imaginal, the collective unconscious, under and above our planes of existence, the realm behind the veil, etc.  

It’s also worth noting that the founder of modern materialism and rationalism, Rene Descartes, had a dream in which an angel came to him and said: “the mastery of nature is achieved through measure and numbers.” Ultimately, his prophetic insight became the impulse to move towards science at the behest of an Angelic being. So, in our contemporary world, the question becomes. To which side of good and evil does this Angel come? It is safe to say it was for good, but presently, in the wake of this woke virus that came out of the nu-atheistic and rational side that intermixes itself with scientism, it polluted the notion of honest science and left politics.   

Not only have they polluted those things mentioned, but also our archetypes, our ancient mythological frameworks. So they’re trying to bring down our fixed archetypal key frames made in history by a woke collective in the form of a daemon. This perverse being tries to destroy everything, mostly sites of potent imaginal resistance, and try to colonise it from the inside – we are going into a collapse. So, these archetypes are on the way out. – runesoup.com

For instance, in the wake of the MeToo movement in the Weinstein case – Joss Whedon was accused of abusive behaviour by actors and actresses. I’m not going to argue his innocence or guilt or that it might just be typical behaviour of a competent director, but it’s more than that. And this is a time where, later on, Amber Head would lament her personality disorder and narcissistic behaviour to mainstream consensus – juxtaposed where politically correct ideas infect the movie studio writers, atomising most studios for a loss, all in the wake of Epstein’s fall.

Whedon, who had been a proponent of female leads and feminism, was most of the actresses who came forward and declared his abusive misconduct and misogyny the opposite of what he imparts in his shows. He was also producing a show called The Nevers. In a story set in Victorian England, a group of people known as “The Touched” emerged in 1896 after a freak event where some alien ship shaped like a fish spreads plasmic dust all over London. Some walked away from the event with certain gifts called “turns.” This phenomenon affects explicitly women, as well as the occasional man.

I think Whedon felt the pressure building and either by coincidence or incidentally imparted a story where a Character, Lavinia Bidlow [the Hierophant character], implies she will kill the Siren. Mary Brighton can sing a special Siren-like song that only other Touched ones can hear – Amalia describes it as a song of “hope” that can bring the Touched together. I’m not saying all females are Jessabelle-inflicted, but those possessed by that Jessabelle spirit [or even the scarlet woman/witch] can influence people and externalize blame and guilt. Whedon was accused of having his hand in the cookie jar. In his unconscious way of disenchantment, he kills the Siren in fiction.   

mysterious energy force, Vril, an “all-permeating fluid” of limitless power – found in the Nevers

.

All of this occurred in the Victorian era, the same era in which Blavatsky made her mark. And Blavatsky’s successors always made associations of Blavatsky to the Siren [and maybe not just any ordinary Siren, but Atargatis] as opposed to angelic beings. So we have Hierophant, who kills the Siren in non-fiction, and Whedon, who kills the Siren in fiction and non-fiction [maybe it’s the scarlet women that Crowley unleashed]. In fiction, he is the co-creator, and in non-fiction, he is the subconscious intention, a reaction to what is going on in his life.

There is no danger that dauntless courage cannot conquer There is no trial that spotless purity cannot pass through There is no difficulty that strong intellect cannot surmount For those who win onwards there is reward pass telling the power To bless and save humanity Compassion is no attribute it is the law of laws Eternal harmony allow yourself a shoreless universal essence The light of everlasting right and fitness of all things, the law of love eternal So shall thou be in full accord with all that lives Bare love to men as though they were thy brother pupils Disciples of one teacher the sons of one sweet mother And so if we have brotherhood in our hearts And we live the teachings of Theosophy. – voice of the Sirens

.

I don’t see these archetypes going out; they might get transformed, reinvented or something else. For example, I talk about archetypal key-frames in history, which refer to a process in animation where key-frames hold key positions in movement and drawings are created between those key-frames to show motion. And so relates to these archetypes [gods as examples]; without that structure [key-frames], there is no movement in between. So, these archetypes will never be on their way out; they might go into hibernation or be forgotten, but they’re always there.   

This unconscious universal language embedded in media speaks to the source of that language within us. So, all forms of media are subliminal; they produce unwanted side effects of psychosis and schizoid personality disorders. Some of the events within media that are expressed visually have an inverted application within the myth-poetic created patterns. The media are co-opting the co-creative facility to create a chaotic or dangerous world that might not be as bad as we are told. We simultaneously take in gnostic myth conceptions captured by invoking gnostic misconceptions. These misconceptions are understood as a narrative of simulation theory that borders on nihilism, an infinite game theory and cycles of social engineering. However, a gnostic reclamation revival is occurring but is in danger of getting co-opted by mainstream media, which will redirect to a myopic nihilistic inward self-worship. Instead of what it is, a reconnection of the Holy Spirit at the heart of the co-creative faculty. – symbols, patterns, & Gnosis 

A genius doesn’t necessarily mean a person; it may be an attendant spirit that co-creates with a person and inspires them. It might be the Holy Spirit, a guardian angel that likes to get creative. If God creates beings like angels and patterns them after the creative source of everything, it makes sense that emulating Him would be through the creative act. So, when you encounter something inspiring, you interact with language in a creative situation. That was co-created by a spiritual entity now communicating with you through your consciousness as you put these language patterns into your mind, and they trigger thoughts and feelings. Those individual thoughts, feelings, memories, and intuition will create a personal meaning from that inspiration. – symbols, patterns, & Gnosis   

The Holy Spirit or angel that inspires [let’s say literature] will inspire you – now, suddenly, you have a one-on-one dialogue with the co-creator. So, in reading a book and knowing what is going on with the author’s mind, you can also look over their shoulder, have a relationship with the co-creative faculty, and find meaning personally as an individual. However, at the dark end of the spectrum, those who choose to co-create with dark forces are choosing to tap into self-aggrandisement, egoism, materialism and deceptions. They’re going to co-create a kind of memetic force that we describe as demonic – the fruits of their labour will represent the motives of the co-creative spirits that they work with. – symbols, patterns, & Gnosis       

.

.

Kabbalah Mysteries:

.

.

---

.

The Vision of Ezequiel Points to the Centre [Monad] of the North Mountain [Posted initially on 01st October 2022]: I once described the Sefirot’s association with the planets under our firmament in part eight of this thesis collection. The literal attempts to reach the sky via rockets to reach the stars are also analogous to the ascension of the Holy Mountain [Meru]. And this, in turn, is ascension towards the Tree of Life and the ascension to the Stars. In part twenty-seven, we mentioned Magus recalling Nebuchadnezzar’s dream of the great Tree that shelters the world. In which a Watcher turns up in his dream and decrees that the Tree must be cut down. In short, the Tree was cut down with celestial fire, and following the aftermath, new growth spurred into a mountain where gods will reside. The growth also equates to new roots that identify it to mind and intelligence, adhering to a Tree of Life concept.

Magus describes Paradise as a Womb and Edem [Eden] as the afterbirth, “a river flowing forth from Edem, to irrigate Paradise” the Naval. God formed man in his mother’s womb, in Paradise. He states the navel is separated into four principles represented as two arteries (the channels of spirit) and two veins (the channels of blood). Magus is making a symbolic similarity between the nature of gestation and birth and the physical creation of the world.

The mountain where Moses received his Prophetic missions differs from the Great Tree that once resided in the Earth’s centre. Much like Magus’s illustrative map of the world as a natural birth with all its intricacies of the womb and veins, the Great Tree is a type of Monad. All other mountains, much like veins and rivers, are other trees (now mountains) that once emanated from them, with some having a holy aspect.    

An excerpt from Manly P Hall to his students describes a mysterious vision [we describe this as cosmic consciousness, an awakening or enlightenment experience, and even alien encounter abductions in today’s standard] by a prophet while captive by the River Chebar. That Prophet was Ezequiel:

Ezequiel receives his strange vision on the shores of the aetheric consciousness, the river Chebar is that mystic stream which flows from the material and divine world.

.

In Egyptian mythology, the North is regarded as the ‘abode of the gods’ – a suggestion that can be validated in their ancient writings. Examined in the description of the construction of Temples for the gods, it must have gates facing east, south and west. And excluded is the north gate as the Sun never appeared to them on the northern part of the Heavens. The Egyptian’s polar mountain was the abode of the old dark gods – the fathers of the divine kings – the mysterious Meru of the Hindus. The Bible gives no name to the chariot of majesty [Ezequiel’s visions], but by the Hebrews, it’s called the Merkaba.    

.

The Merkaba was so sacred that it might be spoken of only with the greatest narration and only in the presence of the elders and among the elders. The Merkaba is one of the deepest mysteries of Cabalism; the chariot of righteousness; the seed of the most high; the mysteries of the wheels that goes all ways and are filled with eyes – is thus interpreted by the wisest of cabalists.   The Chariot consist of four creatures called Cherabs each going a different ways with four heads, six wings and the hooves of a calf – each of the Cherab bore the face of a man, a bow, a lion, an eagle and their wings met at the corner of the Merkaba. These mysterious creatures rode on the wheels filled with eyes, and above them was throne and upon the throne was an awful presence in white, surrounded by light and power and accompanied by a rainbow, so numerous and complicated are the interpretation of this vision that we can mention only a small part.

.

Manly P Hall further describes symbolic associations in the Merkaba to that of the world and the universe as a body or vehicle of the creator. It is beneath his feet, for the earth is his footstool. And the Merkaba is the footstool where God manifests only in his lesser part. I won’t go into the symbolic details of Ezequiel’s vision but point out that the astronomical significance needs to be updated to fit non-hyperreal space. Still, within a truer dynamic reality, the structure of the Merkaba is redefined back into its originality.

And to also make the most significant in the symbology is that the Human body itself is a Merkaba [the Chariot of the Law]. So, the four bodies of Man are represented by the four heads of the living creature. The physical body is the Earth or Torus, which is seeded in the heart.    

We discussed the Trinity briefly regarding an association with the gnostic One-Parent [the Mother-Father-Son or Christ] to the Abrahamic Trinity. And a claim I made about the first three Sefirot [Wisdom-Crown-Intuition] as a Trinity; as a map for our left and right dualism, and can be used to discern Hegelianism [notably in politics]. The Merkaba Star Structure [two sold triangles conjoined together at opposite fixtures] is also a design that comes out of sacred geometry. It rotates in different directions, and as it rotates, it creates a three-dimensional field. It creates a perfect balance between our dual nature, of the earth and cosmos, our two sides of our brain, and the masculine and feminine.

The Triangle represents the divine, harmony, and proportion in two-dimensional perspectives. It’s also a symbol of the trinity in Christianity. In the Eastern and Gnostic Arcanum belief systems, the Triangle is defined by many meanings and has various esoteric-philosophical associations. One of those is that the symbol indicates the male and female sex. So, the apex at the top represents the male, and the one with the top down represents the female. Both aspects are within the individual sexes.       

According to Arcanum (Gnostic teachings), Adam formed the first female human (Eve). Elohim took one of Adams’s (who was a hermaphrodite human) ribs, closed up the flesh, and made a woman (Eve). This form of separation is represented symbolically with the triangle (male) and upside-down triangle (female) throughout time; men and women have played the game of seeking unity, hence the craving for sexual connection.

Three solves the discord created in two polarities, resulting in a new integration and wholeness. This can be seen in the mind, body, and spirit divisions, whose unification makes us whole; our visible world is three-dimensional. Three possess wisdom, understanding, and knowledge; on the negative side, they exhibit pessimism, foolhardiness, and unnecessary risk-taking. Three is seen as a magical number. Three, “the magic number”, is further defined because it’s the number of manifestations. It represents thoughts, emotions and actions, each having a casualty effect on the other.

Its roots stem from the meaning of multiplicity, Creative power and growth. Three moves forward with energy, overcoming duality, expression, manifestation, and synthesis. Three is the first number to which the meaning “all” was given. It is The Triad, the number of the whole, as it contains the beginning, middle, and end. The power of three is universal and is the tripartite nature of the world as heaven, earth, and waters. It is human as body, soul and spirit. Three are birth, life, and death. It is the beginning, middle and end. Three is a complete cycle unto itself. It is past, present, and future.

Throughout history, some traditional civilizations had a direct relationship with numbers and letters of the alphabet, so much so that discerning numbers and letters were indistinguishable. On the other hand, some Native American cultures knew no alphabet but could cipher the harmonious measures and proportions within the numerable or nameable totality of the cosmos and so became knowable.

The [Jungian] archetypes and symbolism can also be knowable, and they have everything to do with the context of what is around. Take, for instance, the letters of the Hebrew alphabet – their names, meanings, and purposes are fascinating. Each letter represents a fundamental articulation of the Unity of Being, known to persons of faith as God and known to science as a “Theory of Everything.” Hebrew is a truly universal language, not just among the nations of humankind but also universal in meditation, cosmology, and physics, and it is spiritually and technically sound. Meru Foundation research demonstrates that the letter sequences in the Hebrew text of Genesis are part of an effective science of consciousness, an extraordinary cosmology meeting the highest technical standards – and by no means through the understanding of allegory, but a Tree of Life for those who can grasp it.  

Modern kabbalah researchers focusing on hyperreal space to explain the cosmos in a Kabbalah framework are wasting their time. Although there is legitimacy in how they structure mysticism as a rational approach via the scientific method [like meaning in words and even that it’s closer to philosophy], there is no difference to an atheist trying to rationalise a universe with supernatural elements. Even in the science of Alchemy, it has more to do with chemical essence that coincides with the body and psychological evolutions of the mind and spirit. Alongside its astrological planetary levels [Celestial garments within the firmament], magic is also part of it. A Kabbalistic hyperreal Cosmos [minus the planetary levels] are two philosophical disciplines that can never go together.  

Then how about maths? It’s more of language that can be attached to anything, even the exploits of any scientism’s notion. Mysticism is a generic term that has far more meaning than science. Jewish mysticism refused to define mysticism because mysticism is intrinsically connected with the particular system, whether it’s Mysticism like Kabbalah, concerned about cosmology [the divine is manifesting itself to the world] or mysticism, that’s more personal in terms of connection with god and how to approach god.

The Mountain as a Psychological Interest: The debate around what is universal concerning symbols, archetypes, correspondence, etc., is by no means by its specific context. If it does happen to be universal, it still doesn’t negate specific interpretations; for example, a mountain in a dream doesn’t necessarily relate to a mountain in a folk tale. Mountains as a symbol are significant. Often, a mountain can represent the polarity of good and evil, positive or negative. In Revelation:

Revelation 8:8

The second angel sounded his trumpet, and something like a huge mountain burning with fire, was thrown into the sea. A third of the sea turned into blood.

.

Swedenborg’s book Apocalypse Explained answers this in a way that is more meaningful to how a fundamentalist might see it. In Apocalypse Explained 510:1, he says: And something like a huge mountain burning with fire. This symbolizes self-love and, from that, a love for one’s own intelligence. … This kind of love is meant by this mountain because a “mountain” in the Word can symbolize either kind of love – namely, heavenly love or hellish love. The subject here is the evil who are to be separated from the good … – Apocalypse Explained. Hellish love, in this interpretation, means self-interest or narcissism. The last sentence is about removing that evil by being cast down from the mountain and seeing what is false: the blood in the sea.    

While Magus describes passing through the Red Sea, which he calls Blood, and that its water has a bitter taste, he says: “For bitter, he says, is the water which is (drunk) after (crossing) the Red Sea; which (water) is a path to be trodden, that leads to a knowledge in (this) life of (our) toilsome and bitter lot.” Both interpretations are similar, so it’s safe to say they are universal. Both are shedding or passing the bitter taste of self-interest and narcissism to reach an understanding of intelligence or knowledge. In the Bible: 

Isaiah 56:7

Even them I will bring to My holy mountain, And make them joyful in My house of prayer.

.

You can equate this verse with Swedenborg’s many inspirational texts; his book Last Judgment – Supplements states: “Once people have been received by the Lord [into heaven], they can never be plucked out of his hand.” And this is the immovability aspect, much like the phrase, “If the mountain doesn’t come to Muhammad, Muhammad must go to the mountain.” But, moreover, it’s more about the non-repeated cycles in Heaven, to never be put back into the Samsara Wheel.   

In Apocalypse Explained, Swedenborg’s reasoning for mountains being equated to heavenly love or hellish love is stated:

The reason why a mountain can mean either heavenly love or hellish love is this: Angels of the third heaven who have heavenly love live on the mountains in the spiritual world. So … “mountain,” means that third heaven. Or, in terms of the way angels think about it – abstracted from people and places – it means the heavenly love that makes heaven, heaven. In the negative sense, however, a mountain means a love for oneself, because those who are immersed in self-love constantly want to climb mountains, to make themselves equal to angels in the third heaven. Because they think about doing this their fantasies, they also try it when they are outside of hell. This is why “mountain” in a negative sense means self-love. In a word, those who are immersed in self-love always yearn for high places. So after death, when all the states of love become correspondences, they have the illusion if propelling themselves way up high, and believe they are on high mountains, when their bodies are in hell. – Apocalypse Explained

.

When talking about Mountains residing in the spiritual world, it means you have to be in a place of love (or love is where one lives) before a mountain manifests. A mountain can also mean a love for oneself, about self-interest and putting oneself above everyone else. They constantly want to climb mountains to equal themselves to angels in the third heaven, but these ego types are negative. They are merely illusionary, so mountains, in a negative sense, always mean self-love. So, after death, when all those states of love become correspondences, they have the illusion of propelling themselves way up high and believe they are in high mountains when their bodies (spiritual bodies) are in hell. – Ofthelefteye, Good vs. Evil, Swedenborg & lIfe 

Swedenborg, a universal genius, was a psychologist (among many other things) even before Freud. There are hints of what psychologists diagnose as Narcissism (overt, covert, borderline) personality disorders in his biblical interpretations. Unlike former psychologists, now YouTubers (and psychologist wannabes) have indicated these Narcissistic symptoms and traits – Swedenborg mentions these symptoms in his work but does it more subtly.

Christian fundamentalists will no doubt link Swedenborg’s teachings to the New Age movement, with words like love, heavenly love, a place of love, divine, and enlightenment being thrown around because they want to deny intuition essentially. Swedenborg’s teachings are interpretations of theology that seem out of tune with their rigid reasoning and would infuriate them. They’ve made it clear that their opinion of the New Age is a way of thinking (or institutions) that undermines Christianity and destroys God’s revelation. What they mean is it’s something that undermines their type of Christianity (an institution that is in bed with the state) and destroys their interpretation of the revelation of God. And those interpretations are always about consolidating the ancient world’s mythology and deeming it satanic.

This is kind of strange and ironic, given there are a lot of Protestants and reactionaries, specifically marginalized and disenfranchised males. A large group listens to modern-day T.S Elite, like Jordan Peterson, who himself takes a lot of subjects concerning biblical archetypes and ancient mythologies and applies them through psychology. He applies that in real life, conveying it like a modern self-help guru. So, it aligns with what Swedenborg had done with concepts of esoteric Christianity. However, Evangelicals see psychology as something that goes against their religion.

Recently Peterson was incorrectly labelled a spokesperson for the Incel groups. And this is ironic because the author Neil Strauss, who authored a dehumanising book on picking up girls in a methodical manner, is what inspired [indirectly] groups like Incels—methods like negging, which is no different to gaslighting.

In Strauss’s book, he discusses how men often subconsciously seek a specific type of father figure, comparable to Miyagi for Daniel or Balboa for Creed Johnson. These father archetypes possess wisdom that we wish our fathers would embody. We envision the ideal father as a mystical (spiritual) guide, a scientist (alchemist or Pythagorean thinker), or an artist (like a poet). However, the reality is often quite different, as we frequently encounter rigid, pragmatic figures that prioritise their own egos. This disconnect is part of why Jordan Peterson gained such significant influence; he embodies the father archetype many men yearn for. His appeal goes beyond being a mere spokesperson for a marginalised demographic.

It doesn’t negate that reactionaries and fundamentalists like to lump someone like Swedenborg or someone like Blavatsky, who was also prolific, as the first few authors to popularise occultism and merge it with Christianity. Maybe so, but it’s also a clever way to indicate two different teachers who differ in their methodology to something the same. One specifically used a method like a séance for contact with the dead, and the other was about being struck by the light or (fire) [and was not by choice] but by the grace of God. Fundamentalist Christians have regulated Swedenborg as someone who shaped the thinking of nineteenth-century New England transcendentalists like Emerson, Thoreau, Ripley, Holmes, and Alcott, who would later influence Madam Blavatsky.

Perhaps it was so, but it’s still a generalisation; Blavatsky was a product of her situation, a combination of reactionary impulses during her time. The Industrial Revolution brought about a kind of paranoia in a steampunk landscape in England, from grounded farming sensibilities to a labour force, industry and factory mills. As a counteraction, there was a move towards mysticism. Occult groups would pop up everywhere, like Theosophy, Freemasonry, Mormonism, Christian Science, and so on – all merging at a time of social upheaval. The point of belief was the idea that parallels the ubermensch concept that a new superhuman would counterbalance this latest upheaval. Taking ideas from [a famous Rosicrucian] Edward Bulwer-Lytton, the author of ‘Vril, the power of the coming race’ novel – a book that popularised hollow earth theory. The idea of a civilisation that housed hidden higher evolutionary alien-like beings living in that hollow underground caught the interest of Theosophist groups like Blavatsky and Bailey, who introduced those ideas into their books.      

A mystical fictional fantasy novel would be the catalyst for Theosophy, which was the impetus for the interest in the mystical, occult, new/proto-new-age that engulfed the 19th century. After which, a common perpetual cycle of inspiration would attach itself to reality and the fictional aspect of that reality. So Vril became popular that rumours of that the core Nazi party came from the Vril society, a theory brought forth by a German rocket scientist named Willy Lay – who was also part of the science fiction circle in Los Angeles. That included people like Jack Parsons and L Ron Hubbard [creator of scientology] – and so this nexus of inspiration manifests itself in fiction, the new age of spirituality, and religion and politics.    

I once described Northrop Fry’s Demolition: “symmetry, in any narrative, always means that historical content is being subordinated to mythical demands of design and form.” The symmetrical aspect of false memory divulges into what memory isn’t. So, when non-fictional modes adopt something potent like ancient, apocryphal, esoteric archetypes, it’s attaching itself to a structure that ascends upwards like Jacobs’s ladder or climbing the holy mountain. The potency of this symmetrical nature is timeless. I think Alien Cults or Watcher Cults understood this and used that structure for their self-interest and benefit, unlike that State Cult – that tunnels it through an infinite asymmetrical external satellization. Though it might be hyperreal, it might be the last false ideological stronghold. If it breaks down [and is why they introduced the whole flat earth thing to the zeitgeist in the first place], so they can introduce a synthesis of fallen angel worship. 

The cult groups retell the same potent story through fiction or science-fiction; it’s meta-fiction within non-fiction within fiction. Fiction uses ancient archetypes and then adopts fictional symmetry modes [this is like recycling or rebooting]. Still, you’ve got something when it adopts something asymmetrical to work in a symmetrical mode. Resulting in something like a Scientology religion or something that can veer off into politics and entertainment; now you’re in the cult space.

The hollow earth is nothing but the underworld [or, in our non-fictional perspective, underground breakaway civilisations]; the incarnated coming race is nothing but watcher angels and their hybrid’s offspring [Alien human hybrid experiments and also spirit possessions from the spirits of the Nephilim and Watchers]. The cult groups that worship them have a lot of sway in determining the future of civilisations. Their worship is about making plans for the fallen or ‘The Fallen One’ to find their way home to the stars. So, in a structure that ascends upwards … it seems they’re descending … or you could entertain the ascending aspect depending on your cosmological ideologue. So, what do these worshippers think they’ll get in the end?  

Witch Mountain; Revising an Astro-Gnostic Parable: Witch Mountain is a film about a Las Vegas cabbie who enlists the help of a UFO expert to protect two siblings with paranormal powers from the clutches of an organization that wants to use the kids for their nefarious plans.

The Witch Mountain may play like a Gnostic parable: two children who are aliens who fell to Earth from their home planet in a binary star system (Sirius). These notions are comparable to those of Aeons, who fell from the Pleroma (meaning “the Fullness”). It also has a hyperreal space similar to the Centre of the Earth, much like the Cosmic Centre of the Earth (the Galaxy’s centre). In this sense, the Sun, the centre of the solar system, is the closest Pleroma we have in human terms, in so much as a hyperreal-space-notion.

Another outlook would be that the Mountain that once resided in the centre of the earth is the Witch Mountain. The witch aspects suggest magic, and in magic, something supernatural happens in the Mountain, for it was once a tree that reached the heavens. It’s now a gateway or a singularity, and it’s what new-age-flat-earthers call the entrance to Paradise. The two children are displaced from their home, representing falling from the earth.

Deftones’ Chino Moreno’s many Astro-Gnostic songs, a lyric in particular,  “Bloody Cape”, suggest ships (boats) leaving their home and seeking the frontier, much like the British and Columbian ships, which set sail for the New World or New Atlantes.    

In waves the ships have all sailed to the sea Well do you want to wait or leave with me tonight Cross your heart and pray The ocean will take us all the way in   First we are ever to fall off of the earth We must be the First ones in the world to fall off of the earth

.

Of course, the song is represented through human experience; it outlines the similarities between the two Children and humanity’s affiliation of being lost in its world. The two children are either original Atlantean beings or star children, both coming from different places but ultimately wanting to go in the same direction and hoping the “ocean will take us in” to that unknown; still, for the two Children, it’s home. A parallel in humanity’s alienation, humanity is alien from its world, ever so slightly standing apart from the animal kingdom, which is harmonious and inherently with a sense of synchronistic animism. The human capacity to explore and determine where we come from follows the same mission statement.

Like in Star Trek, a spaceship made to explore space, and when it fires up its nacelle engines to go light speed, they are “falling off of the earth.” A motif likened to the first civilisations to cross continents in their ships. In a more spiritual sense, the ships refer to a Duat Boat that can also represent a Chariot and a Merkaba, all symbols of the spirit.   

The children fell to earth from space, and space is where the stars reside, is often called one of the heavens under the firmament. The children are not aliens but angels who have forgotten where their original home existed, leaving them alienated; they realise they’re from somewhere else because of their supernatural powers. Later, they figure out that where they must go is Witch Mountain. And let’s not forget Swedenborg describes it this way: “Angels of the third heaven who have heavenly love live on the mountains in the spiritual world.” “Mountains mean people who possess the goodness of love since angles dwell upon a mountain.” 

Deftones’ Guitarist Stephen Carpenter is open about his flat earth belief. It’s fitting, considering that rationalists also use Chino’s fall of the earth lyrical remark to denote an obtuse presumption that living on flat earth – ships in sail will eventually fall off the earth. It’s a fact that people believed in a flat earth longer than a spherical one, and even in a rationalist position, it is the most rational and, at the same time, the most innocuous. In such a case, the archetypal dominance or imagery is highly unlikely to be perceived in the collective unconscious, unlike the dominant flood-like dream.           

A combination of archetypes manifested through archetypal symbols combined with individual conditions and cultural characteristics along with archetypal symbols from the past (that we call myth)—like a living collective trauma [say, for instance, a flood] trying to express itself alongside the dreamer.   

Genesis 7:19,20

And the water strengthened greatly, greatly on the earth, and all the high mountains that were under the whole heaven were covered. Fifteen cubits upward the water towered, and it covered the mountains.

.

Secrets of Heaven 797, 798: The water that covered the mountains symbolizes the fact that persuasive lies wiped out all the good effects of charity. The meaning of fifteen cubits upward the water towered, and it covered the mountains [is] the fact that nothing was left of charity. [- Secrets of Heaven]. Another meaning for a mountain is charity and love for thy neighbour (likened to basic human decency that became unheard of during that time), which was buried by persuasive lies during a certain point in human history.

The fifteen cubits are a clear indicator that nothing was left. And this is undoubtedly something for infinite-flat-earth believers to ponder; for a flood to rise (or water to rise in general), you need a container to hold water in, something enclosed. A hyperreal notion of a spherical planet fixes this in a way that’s not beholding to a creator – but in the realms of a cosmic event.

The flood symbolizes an archetype, to be more precise, an archetypal symbol that is within all of us – something universal that’s part of the collective that applies to all cultures and across all generation gaps – something that is not dependent on the individual and their life experiences. They can appear in dreams, fairy tales, mythologies and so forth; often, these archetypes are transcendent and beyond conscious perception, even beyond dreams. The flood symbol is synonymous with dreaming [personally, I’ve had many flood dreams].

.

.