Mystics & Artist-Prophets:

---

.

Concluding our Evacuation Discourse: Awaken the Non-Voters: The discussion revolves around the fundamental question of evacuation—specifically, the idea of “evacuating the middle” across contexts such as politics, corporations, ideologies, religion, and the balance between scepticism and truth. This middle ground has become problematic, yet it is also fleeting. Its form can change, which means we can reshape it while preserving elements that are good, ethical, and moral. The core questions are:

• How do you evacuate the middle and assemble the form that remains while preserving the polarised citizens’ belief in democracy?

• How do you promote healthy scepticism within conspiracy theory without the right-wing pipeline engulfing it into their firebrand, and the left-wing simulating it into their hyperrealism and (false) facts branding?

• How do you then update a traditional (pre-Bruno) worldview while integrating the forms that seem probable from our modern/ contemporary one while dispensing scientism (hyperrealism) altogether?

• How do you evacuate fundamentalism from Christendom as these Christian adjacent cult groups of power grow and metastasise into something else as it engulfs into (nationalism) politics and conspiracy theory.  

• How do you evacuate New Age thought from normal behaviour because like fundamentalism it has its own cult groups driven by spiritual grifting selling a great awakening or deliverance from an apocalyptic world to higher consciousness; ready for the invite for a larger galactic federation.

All these questions share a familiar theme of evacuation and reassembly of form. I may not be fully qualified to answer them, but I do have some ideas. Regarding the first question about democracy, I propose that the United States initiate a law requiring every citizen to vote. This law should include efforts to educate non-voters about both current and past fascist regimes and emphasise the importance of upholding democracy alongside the constitution as a vital blueprint. If non-voters participate in elections alongside those who typically vote, we could create a majority that would make it difficult for fascist nationalist movements to regain power. This participation would also help expose any corruption and guilt among democratic leaders. This approach has hope as opposed to completely splitting the country in two. There is hope for evacuation, as demonstrated by New York City, where democratic socialism has gained significant traction. The mayor is actively working to educate the population about these issues.

In this era of awakening, the challenges seem less daunting than they did during the Obama administration, when the backlash against Obamacare became intertwined with broader cultural conflicts. Society appeared more stable back then than it does now. Modern-day Democrats have lost their fortitude, having been weakened in the post-neo-liberal Clinton era. They are often forced to align with APEC and comply with Republican overreach. This is exemplified by Chuck Schumer’s betrayal of his constituents, as he has capitulated to corporate oligarchs and their agenda. Schumer has not compromised just once, but twice, during a government shutdown, failing to uphold his position on healthcare.

Neoliberalism, which originated during the Reagan era, has remained influential and is shaped by historical colonial powers. This ideology is based on the belief that civilisation advances only when a select few enlighten what are often referred to as “animist” tribes—reflecting an authoritarian mindset. Historically, symbols of war have been associated with civilisation, influenced by iconic heroic figures. However, conservatives often view war as a fundamental truth, believing that all life forms are destined to compete for limited natural resources while promoting their own ideologies. For Christian fundamentalists and conservatives, violence is seen as an inherent aspect of life. They regard it as inevitable and take pride in preparing themselves for it.

This same concept (of how we shape progress) is still in place today, the same moral sleight of hand that justifies capitalism—the CEO’s burden to uplift the working man by exploiting them while bringing us up with him. Trickle-down philosophy is a repackaged white man’s burden for modern capitalists. Capitalism itself is an inheritor of much of colonialism’s logic of time and progress as justification for exploitation and conflict. And violence is seen as this natural evolutionary process for progress; it’s a politically neutral worldview.

The idea combines American exceptionalism with evolutionary progress, suggesting that our natural progression towards a predetermined destiny is rooted in technology. During the Reagan era, archetypal heroes—often depicted as CEOs, financiers, managers, and brokers—were ambitious men whose personal successes were believed to benefit the working class through the trickle-down effect of their wealth. Reagan’s vision was infused with a sense of American nationalism and exceptionalism, in contrast to Thatcher’s belief in neoliberalism as a natural order of civilisation. Over time, this concept evolved into a focus on technocracy and a techno-fascist perspective, with figures like Elon Musk and Sam Altman leading the charge.

The so-called “techno-Alphas” who are leading the charge are merely portraying a fictional version of an Alpha type, the swagger in space persona. A persona that does not exist in real life; instead, they cling to a made-up character that allows them to express their megalomania and hidden desires through a distorted image. These individuals struggle to form genuine love or emotional connections, as this would require true empathic intimacy. Their inherent narcissism drives them to seek dominance over those they perceive as beneath them. Even when their behaviour is framed in terms of conquest, victory, ego, or control, it remains insincere and serves only as a facade for public relations.

Concluding our Evacuation: Seriality an Answer to Conspiracy Theory Uncertainty: The word “Kirk” has both symbolic and etymological connections to the concept of the traditional Church, which is referred to as “Kirk” in Scottish usage. In “Star Trek,” Captain Kirk commands the Star-ship Enterprise, which can be seen as a metaphor for the endeavour of building churches. This idea of enterprise may help explain why many churches are divided into different denominations. Additionally, the term “Kirk” is related to the Roman word “Ceres,” the name of a Roman goddess known as Mother Ceres. This name can be traced back to an even older goddess from Greek mythology named “Circe.” Circe is often depicted as a goddess of magic and, at times, as a nymph, witch, enchantress, or sorceress. According to most accounts, she was the daughter of the sun god Helios and Perse, an Oceanid nymph.

The podcaster Charlie Kirk is, therefore, the captain of his own Star-ship; he sits in a chair under his Church and wants to convince people to join his enterprise. However, I struggled to understand the admiration for Charlie Kirk, a podcaster known for his racist, sexist, and pro-Nazi views. While his death should not be celebrated, he also shouldn’t be viewed as a martyr or a saint. He has become an exaggerated symbol for racist nationalists within the MAGA movement, showing all the signs of being an astroturfed icon. His status implies a seriousness that doesn’t merit attention, and his bleak outlook resonates like nihilistic rays in his key efforts. He exploited the insecurities of young college students to convert them into Republican votes, taking advantage of their youth and inexperience to manipulate them in debate scenarios.

After his death, conspiracy theories swept the internet, suggesting it was a false flag cleverly designed to resemble an assassination. This alleged false flag reportedly used holographic cameras, mirrors, and shadows to create a deceptive illusion. The technology, primarily used by film and TV studios, can render realistic depictions of various scenarios. This represents a modern take on a mid-nineteenth-century illusion known as “Pepper’s Ghost.”

.

In Star Trek, they often have a specific room called the Holodeck. It uses holograms, force fields, and other technology to create a realistic, interactive 3D simulation of a setting, environment, or story.     

The issue with conspiracy theories is their inability to establish fixed positions within a broader context, as their propositions have no limits. They tend to gravitate toward right-wing ideologies due to a combination of populist psychological predispositions, political context, and media dynamics. Ironically, the process used to analyse conspiracy theories can be confusing, as those engaging in this analysis often exhibit lower analytical thinking skills. These individuals typically align themselves with right-wing authoritarianism and social hierarchies. In the 1980s, this alignment manifested as a heightened perception of threat, encapsulated in the “five minutes to total doomsday” mentality. The media landscape has been heavily saturated by right-wing outlets, from Fox News to various podcasters, which has resulted in these perspectives overshadowing more progressive viewpoints. Political leaders have also drawn on conspiracy theories to bolster their ambitions and profiles, thus providing populists with a false figurehead to depend on.

They distrust mainstream government media and prefer to follow information silos and echo chambers, and as a result, promote their own motivated reasoning through ideologically aligned conspiracies. Alongside low institutional trust in government and the media, it’s a type of scepticism filled with cognitive dissonance. Similarly, left-wing scepticism is about following legacy news, and their left-wing firebrand is self-referentialism, “scientists say” dogma. They ignore scepticism from conspiracy theorists that might have some rational validity. Therefore, where does that leave the truth?

Sartre’s concept of “seriality,” as discussed in his critique of dialectical reason highlights a fundamental issue with conspiracy theories. In this context, serial social ethics can serve as a temporary placeholder for truth, with individuals collectively adhering to norms to ensure the best possible outcomes. Any resistance to this ethic is unproductive because it prioritises the establishment of laws that everyone must follow over individual rebellion or personal connections. The effectiveness of this experiment relies on a specific group’s willingness to conform to social logic, often motivated by a fear of being left behind. As a mere placeholder, seriality is interchangeable. To truly embrace a cohesive, liberated social existence, individuals must break free from this ordered structure. By doing so, we can exert our will to reshape our social and political realities. This process resembles establishing criteria for truth through laws that are subject to change, which may eventually prove certain truths wrong. For now, however, these laws define our understanding of truth.

Concluding our Evacuation Discourse – MAGA-Republicanism and the Crying Game: The personas that technocrats like Musk, Thiel, and Andreessen project allow them to express their hidden desires through a caricatured façade, particularly exemplified by the archetype of the “swaggering man in space.” This phenomenon closely resembles the fictional character Captain Kirk from Star Trek. I previously wrote about Elon Musk’s relationship with power, comparing him to Sartre’s exploration of Jean Genet’s homosexuality. After making a Nazi salute in front of the world, Musk became a representation of an inversion of Genet; he seems to have been liberated from morality by power. His Nazi gesture appears to serve as a symbolic tool, designed to ritualise his power and maintain his sense of untouchability.

Genet is portrayed as a monster after being caught stealing a cookie as a child, and the guilt thrust upon him through people’s gazes and assumptions penetrated him, transforming him into an object. The hand in the cookie jar is the crisis; the condemnation and guilt afterwards was the rape. Sartre says: “In our moral consciousness, a true rape can become unjust, yet inescapable condemnation; and, conversely, a condemnation can be experienced as rape. Both transform the guilty person, and he feels this objectification in his heart as a feeling of shame and in his sexual being as a subjection to coitus. From now on, Genet is deflowered; an iron grasp has made a woman of him; all that remains is for him to get used to being” [– Sartre]. After which, he would become a vestal of homosexuality.

Sartre’s examination Genet’s explores homosexuality, crime, and abjection not as simple identity but as a subversive performance, often focusing on the “macho” man and a system where the debased homosexual partner worships the heterosexual “pal,” exposing the theatricality of societal norms, and using the language of the oppressor (hetero-normative discourse) to critique it by revealing the constructed nature of “natural” masculinity and desire within a world that criminalizes difference.

Elon represents a perversion of virtue; he is a figure who, having gained power, has severed his ties to morality. His sense of guilt manifests through a troubling gesture that reflects his techno-fascist ambitions, which go largely uncondemned by both the elites and the general public. He is the one committing the violation, and it is impossible to instil morality in someone who exhibits narcissism and possesses an inflated, fragile ego. His actions have transformed those around him into monstrous versions of themselves, even causing his followers to adopt a certain “gayness.” This includes right-wing podcasters and mainstream media journalists who have publicly claimed that his gesture was merely an act of compassion, saying, “My heart goes out to you.” However, this “gayness” is not traditional; it’s more about guilt by association. Elon has turned them into his pawns, stripping them of their integrity and burdening them with his guilt and shame.

This situation with Trump’s ICE agents, manipulated by his Nazi senior advisor, whose fascist agents resemble the loser Proud Boys types and MAGA anti-woke individuals who arrest brown-skinned Mexicans, fuelled by Elon’s depredation of guilt. Arresting and importing with it that vestal of Guilt.

In an era where confident (Christian) Nationalist Republican leaders seem to protect abusers and gate-keep the release of Epstein files that could implicate the president, it is troubling to note that many of these leaders have been rumoured to be closeted homosexuals. The vice president, in particular, has often been criticised as a failed drag queen. They claim to hold the moral high ground, yet their actions reveal deep hypocrisy. Recently, Fox News commentator Jesse Watters (whose sexuality warrants further investigation) suggested to JD Vance that transgender individuals constitute an organised terrorist group. Vance responded by stating that any encouragement to commit acts of violence against the U.S. government or fellow Americans is characteristic of a terrorist movement. This statement feels out-dated, especially considering the ongoing discussions around the events of January 6, 2021, when Trump encouraged his supporters to storm the Capitol. This act, regardless of the extent to which it was planned, qualifies as a terrorist act. The comparison to transgender individuals as terrorists appears to be a straw man fallacy that distracts from the real issues at hand.

Transgender individuals want to live in a society free from discrimination. However, it often feels authoritarian and seeks to exploit them for propaganda purposes, similar to the oppressive tactics seen in Nazi regimes. Interestingly, data shows that some Republicans have an obsession with transgender erotica, with Oklahoma and Texas leading in searches on search engines. This contradiction highlights how their support for a regime that seeks to prosecute transgender individuals is at odds with their private interests. Moreover, there is a tendency to demonise women regarding their reproductive rights, especially in debates about abortion. The far-right and tech-fascists share a disdain for women, rooted in a cultural and religious perspective that views sexuality as shameful. The feeling of same sex lust, passion or desire is so abominable that they hate the object of their desire, leading to self-hatred and alienation. Such feelings can manifest as hostility towards the world, sometimes described as demonic in a spiritual sense. It’s essential to recognise that transgender people are victims of right-wing extremism, not the perpetrators of violence.

I recall Alan Watts describing the role of an actor as a means to momentarily convince us that they are not merely playing a role but truly living it. This illusion makes us believe, if only for a moment, that the fictional drama is real. Watts viewed this as a form of cosmic play, in which everyone plays a role (a persona) while forgetting that they are part of a larger drama—essentially, part of Brahman expressing itself. When we contrast this view with conspiracy theory phrases like “crisis actors,” “deep state,” and “false flags,” as well as with real organisations funded by intelligence agencies that create false flag events, we must acknowledge the very real implications of these terms. Currently, crisis actors are depicted as gun-wielding terrorists. Still, in modern discourse, the label of “terrorist” has shifted to include individuals associated with the transgender community and the incel movement.

The question arises regarding the monstrous nature of conspiracy theories, particularly as they have become increasingly aligned with right-wing and fascistic ideologies. There was a time when conspiracy theories distanced themselves from the extremes of right-wing fundamentalism; however, it’s possible they were never entirely free from it. This is similar to the concept of the “ace in the hole,” which connects with New Age beliefs and spiritual enlightenment, as it serves as a foundation for discussions around cosmic consciousness.  Given this situation, we can attempt to transform these ideas by separating them from extreme ideologies. As I’ve suggested in previous posts, we should focus on a more holistic and balanced understanding, integrating concepts such as synchronicity and mysticism. For conspiracy theories and synchro-mysticism to remain relevant and beneficial, they must distance themselves from extreme right-wing viewpoints and adopt more politically neutral perspectives Otherwise narratives whether in schizoids’ memes or something else misrepresents itself concerning subjects that have not properly utilised Art as a balance between the individual and groups. Synchro-mysticism must remain neutral; otherwise, it risks becoming a form of conservative-synchro-mysticism, leaning too far towards one side.

Connecting MTD (Mystical Therapeutic Deism) with woke-ism may be a stretch. However, the approach of new atheism often involves stacking (false) facts in a way similar to how woke-ism assembles (politically incorrect/correct) morals to reach a rational conclusion. There’s a suggestion that “woke” emerged from the mystery cult movement and has been modernised, suggesting possible ties to contemporary governmental State-Cults; this idea may hold some truth. Furthermore, at various times, the transgender community has emphasised that they do not identify with or represent the state-cult’s own woke and transgender representatives, who often portray them as straw-man terrorists or agents of media propaganda. We must recognise these two distinct modalities: one with an agenda and the other seeking to exist authentically in the world. It’s essential to have the intuitive capability to discern between actual acts of terrorism and those that are clearly false flags.

Kai Anderson is a manipulative, power-hungry cult leader who uses fear and chaos to gain control, embodying both radical political extremism and toxic masculinity. He represents right-wing nationalist extremism, and his blue hair serves as a symbol of a more “woke” ideology. Kai gathers followers reminiscent of Nazi-like groups to narrate the story of the Jonestown Massacre. This is juxtaposed with a false-flag shooting in Nashville, carried out by a transgender woman wearing a red hat, which symbolises hatred. This contrast between the red hat and Kai’s blue hair highlights symbolic contradictions. The name “Kai,” which means “sea” in Japanese, is significant because it draws inspiration from Trump’s 2016 election, which fuelled the character’s terrorist arc in the show’s narrative. It’s suggested that Trump has been synchronistically associated with various archetypes, such as Ahriman, a MAGA hero (an inverse of Perseus holding Algol’s head), and the Beast from the Sea, often represented as a seven-headed creature. Additionally, the Nashville shooting involved three children and three adults who were not killed, making a total of six fatalities. When combined, these numbers result in 33, which raise further questions about hidden meanings and connections.

The State Cult further demonises Transgender people after the Charlie Kirk assassination, where the straw-man motif was in play on the shooter or by his association with his transgender partner. The fabricated document, written by intelligence agencies as false evidence to support their text conversation with each other, is reminiscent of an amateur writer developing their first screenplay, which does not convince anyone.

There is an online community privy only to Gen Z members, and contradictions, ignorance, lack of knowledge, and a lack of awareness of others characterise this world. In parallel to online white neo-Nazis and white supremacists, there exists a significantly misogynistic element within this group. Many of these individuals identify as confessed incels, and among them are subcultures known as furries. These groups often intersect, challenging the assumption that they cannot be part of the MAGA movement. In fact, some young people in the MAGA movement can become radicalised, reflecting a complex interplay of closeted transgender identities that intersects with furries and incels. They see the MAGA being too liberal for them, so they gravitate further right.

Marginalised individuals often grow up in overtly religious MAGA households, where they are expected to conform to gun culture, fundamentalism, and racism. In such environments, there is little room for them to express their true selves, leaving them isolated and seeking a sense of belonging in the darker corners of the internet. This search for connection can lead to further radicalisation, as algorithms work to distort their perspectives. There is a profound fear of coming out to their parents, peers, and church members, which can be overwhelming. This fear sometimes tragically results in suicide. When we consider this alongside the way state-backed groups use these individuals as propaganda figureheads, and how right-wing populists demonise them, the feeling of isolation only deepens.

In the aftermath of Kirk’s assassination, the government took significant measures to silence free speech, particularly highlighted by the firing of Jimmy Kimmel. Kimmel made remarks about Kirk’s connection to the MAGA movement, prompting the Trump administration to pressure the FCC to intervene against ABC’s affiliate, Nexstar, leading to Kimmel’s dismissal from his show. Unfortunately, the First Amendment did little to prevent such actions. Sinclair Media, a conglomerate that operates multiple local media outlets and is owned by major networks such as ABC, FOX, NBC, and CBS, has shown a coordinated pro-Trump bias in its broadcasts. They have proposed honouring Charlie Kirk during Kimmel’s former time slot and demanded an apology from Kimmel for his comments about Kirk and Turning Point USA. This effort to mainstream a controversial figure appears absurd, especially considering that individuals who simply echoed Kirk’s own statements have faced arrests and cancellations. Meanwhile, MAGA supporters seem to be rewarded with donations for using racist slurs against others.

Protesters led by taking the networks off, resulting in Kimmel’s reinstatement. Ironically, as comedian Kimmel faced the threat of being fired, Elon Musk, the owner of X social media, made a comment at CPAC about legalising comedy, claiming that the left is making comedy illegal. This reflects the same victimhood narrative as those who censor free speech—ironically protesting against the very thing they are guilty of.

.

If this does not convince you that the numerous anti-woke memes flooding the internet are merely reactions to the failings of neoliberalism, then consider this: they serve as a parallel inverse atomiser that undermines the entertainment industry. The supposed apocalypse associated with it is a harmless projection, mirroring propagandised memes that aim real harm at the subliminal. Regardless, those who created the concept of “woke”—namely, billionaires—are the same controllers pushing for theocratic fascism. The key difference is that real threats are unfolding in real time, particularly during Trump’s administration. South Park’s Eric Cartman stated, “woke is dead,” essentially urging us to stop fixating on woke talking points that merely generate debates about gender-swapping roles in entertainment or diversity in acting. Instead, we should focus on defending our freedoms from actual authoritarian events.

Often fuelled by a group of billionaires who come together around a vision of a technological utopia –the narrative of our natural evolutionary journey toward destiny is deeply intertwined with technology, particularly as embodied by a prominent figure that many believe is to be Elon Musk. He is often seen as a visionary contemplating space colonisation and aspiring to create a utopia. However, this ambition raises questions about his perception of entitlement, as he seems to believe he has the right to do whatever it takes to realise his vision. These attitudes reflect a mindset characteristic of capitalism and colonialism, now prevalent among tech billionaires. This perspective draws from Darwinian ideology—particularly the phrase “survival of the fittest”—yet overlooks the crucial aspect of traits that best adapt to an environment over multiple generations. Moreover, cooperation may prove to be just as vital, if not more important, for survival than competition alone.

Elon Musk promotes social Darwinism and eugenics, driven by a misguided sense of fascistic heroic ethics, while being oblivious to the concept of an enlightened social Eden that his utopia should embody. He completely misunderstands and disowns his own transgender daughter, revealing that this supposed futurist embraces technological advancements without a corresponding commitment to good moral values. Issues such as structural racism, homophobia, political freedoms, and total economic security need to be addressed. Yet, those who position themselves as guardians of the Promised Land have yet to grow emotionally and spiritually.

.

He views his daughter as a victim of woke ideology, failing to recognise that his resentment is directed at a specific subset of woke transgenderism promoted by the State Cult’s own agenda concerning sex and gender. This ideology did not develop authentically and naturally over the past thirty years. Furthermore, he seems unaware that the State Cult’s motives reveal their hidden ambitions—though perhaps he does know, responding in a manner as sterile as the Hittite myth discussed by Pseudo-Plutarch. In this myth, a question arises: why does Mithras make a rock pregnant? The answer is that Mithras hates women. Initiates of these mysteries, much like those in Freemasonry, were exclusively male. The State Cult’s woke ideology surrounding transgenderism inevitably transforms into a reactionary stance, ultimately feeding into right-wing anti-woke nationalism and fundamentalism.

This argument revolves around the relationship between sexuality and spirit versus biology and fact. Biologically, it is a fact that human sexualities and sexual organs are typically associated with their respective sexes. However, variations can occur due to hormonal or chromosomal imbalances, and both hermaphrodites and intersex individuals exist, alongside that undergoing hormone therapy for gender identity. Critics (Trans-investigation) who create rigid templates based on assigned sex to evaluate transgender individuals are misinterpreting the complexities of human sexuality. To achieve accurate empirical data and statistics, one would need to conduct precise imaging scans of the bodies in question. Their flawed methodology leads to conclusions based on assumptions rather than facts. For instance, the misconception that women lack an Adam’s apple exemplifies the shortcomings of this approach. In reality, both men and women have an Adam’s apple; it is simply less prominent in women due to the more obtuse angle of the thyroid cartilage.

Trans-investigating reactionaries often exhibit paranoia similar to that of Christian fundamentalists. They believe that society is becoming more accepting of queer identities due to some unseen, insidious force. They become distressed when they realise that the women they admire and have framed on their walls might have been born male. While they claim to have nothing against transgender people, their anger stems from what they perceive as dishonesty and manipulation that threatens to confuse identity. These individuals see themselves as victims of a supposed agenda that inflicts guilt and promotes homosexuality. What they’re furious about is having the option taken away; to be found guilty or otherwise when they’ve already become the vestal of guilt/homosexuality. While most men are secure enough to shake off these concerns, some react with confusion, obsessively searching for signs of gender nonconformity. Ultimately, the issue is not solely about an unseen force or agenda—though that can be a factor—but about self-reflection and discovery in modern society, which has made being queer more acceptable.

Transgender individuals often identify as transgender (transgender woman or transgender man) rather than conforming to traditional gender constructs of woman and man. They acknowledge biological sex in its binary form. However, discussions about biology and sex, which tend to dismiss gender, have led to a scientific understanding that suggests gender exists on a spectrum rather than being strictly binary. This perspective is often linked to ideologies that create divisive spaces, as well as the bureaucratic machinery of state entities that aim to expand women’s rights while simultaneously challenging traditional masculinity. In the current political landscape, MAGA Republicans are not focused on expanding women’s rights; instead, they seem to be dismantling those freedoms through their political actions.

Here you can see the contrast between a country grappling with its insecurities and one that has none. The latter often chooses the least convincing transgender spokesperson as their representative.

The movement towards androgyny and transgenderism often emerges historically in the later stages of a culture, coinciding with societal decline. In the past, without access to hormone treatments, individuals who took on androgynous roles, such as sodomites, were typically initiates within their communities. In modern times, the increase in transgender representation can be linked to the rise of pornography and the evolution of the internet and technology. Late-stage civilisations, alongside these technological advancements, exhibit a unique sophistication. As a reactionary result, you get people in power convinced of the power of heroic masculinity (closeted or not) on the edges, starting to mask reality.  

MAGA-Republicans and the Christian right’s focus on controlling women’s bodies reflects a more profound, subconscious desire to break free from their own spiritual limitations regarding sexuality. However, they have essentially imprisoned themselves due to religious and political beliefs, causing them to project their feelings of alienation and resentment onto those who are free from such constraints. This phenomenon can be seen in the ongoing efforts to restrict abortion rights, particularly as part of Project 2025. In several conservative states, laws are being proposed that would require young women who become pregnant as a result of rape to carry their pregnancies to term, even if it poses a risk to their health. These measures indicate a desire to control women’s bodies, often reducing them to mere vessels for childbirth. When policies are enacted to uphold a false moral stance, there is frequently a lack of support for that view, and social benefits that could help address the economic challenges of raising a child are often denied. This highlights the priority placed on ensuring that babies are born, regardless of the circumstances surrounding the pregnancy.

There is this tremendous disconnect between the transgender movement and woman’s rights alongside with what’s going on with right-wing government. In this context, morality becomes distorted, opening one door while closing many others. A clear example of this is when an adult imposes their moral beliefs onto a developing child’s body, which constitutes child abuse. A child is not emotionally or physically ready to make decisions about reassignment surgery. Therefore, there should be a law requiring individuals to reach a certain age; notably, eighteen before making such significant decisions. While the right-wing is against re-assignment surgery for children, it’s more about upholding nationalist talking point – as they fail in general to create social policies regarding children in the first place.

In ancient Gnostic creation myths, the Demiurge’s first breath of creation, known as Adamas, was androgynous, embodying both male and female aspects. This being was described as unified and complete, indicating that these early creation myths began with an androgynous existence. The subsequent division into male and female—represented by Adam and Eve as separate entities—was perceived as a “fall” into multiplicity and imperfection, resulting in entrapment in the material world. This separation is seen as the true fall. To attain gnosis (secret knowledge) and achieve salvation, one must reunify the separated masculine and feminine principles. Thus, the ultimate goal is this reunification.

In another Gnostic parable, the “Hymn of the Pearl,” the story depicts a reunion of spirit with spirit. It represents the human soul (the Prince) awakening to its divine origin (the King and Queen/Father and Mother). This awakening involves shedding its earthly and forgetful state, symbolised by the Egyptian clothes, in order to reclaim its true spiritual identity and return home. The parable serves as an allegory for Gnosis (knowledge) and spiritual rebirth, where the soul discovers its lost “pearl” (wisdom and self-knowledge) and reunites with its divine source. When considered alongside transgender identity, the story further illustrates the theme of the spirit’s body, shell, or clothing not aligning with its true essence. This misalignment is akin to wearing “unclean clothing” to fit in. Until the spirit reunites with the appropriate garment, it cannot fully express its true spiritual nature.

Concluding our Evacuation Discourse – Mithraism as the Unconscious Side of Christianity: There is an ongoing debate about whether all of Elon Musk’s children were conceived through traditional methods or via surrogacy. The Mithraic idea of creating a child from a rock has a modern parallel in the flat practice of artificial embryo creation. Musk and the so-called “Techno-fascists” align with Republicans in marginalising women and the transgender community. In the world of tech entrepreneurs, there is a notable desire to repopulate the planet in anticipation of an impending apocalypse, resembling a techno version of the Christian rapture. This is accompanied by a paranoia regarding declining birth rates and fears of demographic replacement, while also endorsing eugenics and a totalising brand of white nationalism. They tend to view individuals merely as utilities to be managed and exploited.

The State Cult’s religion is an ancient belief system characterised by a hyper-realistic understanding of space, where technology plays a crucial role in transcending this hyperrealism and driving profit. This religion is filled with contradictions, misleading its followers with a false sense of empiricism and relying on a distorted interpretation of science as its foundation. Ultimately, it seeks a deeper, secret objective: to escape the constraints of time by following a path rooted in ancient wisdom and symbolic understanding. This reflects the technocrats’ belief that space and technology parallel the pursuits of past secret cults, which sought immortality through ecstatic experiences. This delusional quest for technological advancement mirrors a desire to reach the stars via rockets. Ultimately, this is all a form of altar worship that leads to an opposite end: world accelerationism. As they safely reside in an underground civilisation, they prepare to emerge and seek out new lands, including those beyond Antarctica or the Ice Wall.

There is an ongoing debate about the historic connection between Iran’s version of Mithras and the one that emerged in the Mediterranean world; it seems this connection might be only in name. The earliest practitioners of Mithraism were members of a cult group from Cilicia that also worshipped Perseus. Mithras and Perseus share commonalities and may even be manifestations of the same cosmic deity. The mythic mystery represents the shadow side of the unchosen path, known only to secretive cult groups, while the rest of the world has pursued the more mainstream path of Christianity. This narrative is now being unravelled, revealing attempts to misdirect the general populace into believing something different.

.

Mithraic symbolism embodies significant feminine principles of creation and the cosmos, linking Mithras to time (Chronos) and nature. This suggests a broader understanding of a non-binary divine nature. There are Grades in which the second grade is a specific character called Bridegroom or Nymphus, associated with Venus, and a humiliation ritual involving cross-dressing of the initiate. Mithras is not typically depicted as strictly androgynous; however, the cult embraced gender fluidity and duality, with male/female aspects (Mithras/Mithra), and influential cosmic figures like the Leontocephaline (lion-headed, serpent-wrapped). Mithraic symbolism encompassed powerful feminine principles of creation and the cosmos, linking Mithras to time (Chronos) and nature, suggesting a broader, non-binary divine nature.  

Lady Liberty has a symbolic parallel to the Sun God of Mithraism (Helios), but not to Mithras, who is a cosmic being. The Sun God is male, while Lady Liberty is female. In a conspiracy-theory sense one could argue that there is a deliberate attempt to perplex the subconscious by State Cults who manage perceptions to confuse the spirit that follow ancient cults. Or is this a subconscious initiation for the people brought about deliberately or by accident, where the anima and animus converge in one artifice? The Moon Goddess of Mithraism is Luna/Selene, yet she receives little attention. Within the slaying bull depiction there are two torchbearers, they represent each end of the equinox their crossed legs symbolising that. Incidentally Lady Liberty holds a torch also, thus fulfilling three key Mithraism symbolic meanings. Is this part of a state cult’s intention to conceal an agenda, or is it merely coincidental, alongside logistical reframing to save time and labour costs?

The infamous depiction of bull slaying appears to resemble a star map, with each icon representing symbolic meanings associated with the star constellations. Within the vast expanse of the stars lies the Zodiac, which spans a cosmic line across the sky. Additionally, there exists another cosmic line known as the celestial equator, which is essentially the Earth’s equator projected onto the celestial sphere. The Zodiac and the celestial equator intersect at two points in the sky, which correspond to the spring and autumn equinoxes. These equinoxes mark significant times for agriculture.

.

In antiquity, it was believed that the Earth was fixed and immovable at the centre of the universe, with everything else—such as the zodiac and celestial equator—revolving around it. What we now understand as the rotation of the Earth’s axis was once imagined as the entire cosmic sphere rotating around the Earth once a day. This sphere rotated around an axis known as the Great Cosmic Axis. There has never been anything fundamentally wrong with this view. In discussions about evacuation and form, we can update the pre-Bruno perspective by dismissing his transformed cosmic models and returning to their original concept. Currently, we are simply replacing the Earth’s rotation (which is considered inaccurate) with the idea of the cosmic sphere’s rotation—the movement of the stars. The precession movements we associate with a rotating Earth operate similarly to those of the celestial sphere. Furthermore, what appears to be a tilt in the Earth’s axis can be likened to the tilt of the cosmic sphere itself. Bruno, a solar cultist, placed himself at the centre of the universe and positioned himself above the celestial gods.

The line of intersection between the Zodiac and the Celestial equator creates a cross, and, from what Plato gathered about the Demiurge’s creation of this world, it begins at the intersection, symbolised by “x“. The Mithraic Lion-Headed God represents this intersection, and the image below shows the Lion-Headed God (a demiurge parallel) standing on a spherical cross. In his left hand, he holds a pole depicting the axis of the cosmic spheres.

.

In his right hand, he holds a key, symbolising the password that initiates must acquire to enable the soul, upon death or during ecstasy, to ascend through the planetary and dimensional spheres to the realm of the fixed stars. This journey of the soul after death to the heavens is perilous and challenging, with various obstacles to overcome and passwords to be learned at each stage of dimensional travel. Additionally, initiates employed magical breathing techniques, incantations, prayers, and sometimes mind-altering substances or ointments. They believed that a cosmic being capable of granting access to and moving between universes was worthy of worship, which gave rise to the practice of Mithraism. The symbolic death of the bull by Mithras represents a cosmic manifestation of the Lion-headed God’s power to navigate the universes, marking the transition from the constellation Taurus to Aries during the spring equinox.

In this mystical ascent, immortality is achieved by beholding the entire universe and upholding Mithras as a cosmic deity (not a solar deity). The ancient text also refers to a daughter who prepared the ritual ointment used by the initiates during their ecstatic or psychedelic ascent. Magical texts refer to daughters both literally and metaphorically, depicting them as apprentices. This could signify lower-grade (gender-bending) initiates. As is often the case, this makes me wonder whether Elon’s expostulation about his daughter is meant to distance him from a position that renders him ineligible for higher ambitions.

.

Mithra(s) is a cosmic manifestation of the lion-headed god. His emergence from a rock symbolises his miraculous, divine origin as a creator god who brings light and life to the cosmos. This sudden appearance signifies that he is a powerful deity who is both “born on earth” and greater than the cosmos itself, capable of transcending it. He accomplishes this by breaking through the cosmic sphere that surrounds the earth, an analogy reflected in the image of breaking out of the rock – He breaks from it yet has the power to control it.

.

As Mithras kills the Bull, he is positioned above the Bull in the constellation star map. Above Taurus is Perseus, who carries a dagger and wears a Phrygian cap, much like Mithras. Perseus serves as both a constellation and a hero. This journey of the soul after death into the heavens mirrors the modern State Cults’ mission to attain immortality through the allure of space travel and technology. However, it is essential to recognise that this quest is more spiritual than something that can be achieved through material means.

Concluding our Evacuation Discourse: The Techno-Manifest Destiny via New Age Accelerationism: In the last post, we discussed that self-awakening is a phenomenon that occurs in people, either directly or indirectly. Moreover, it offers valuable insight amid the new wave of age-old beliefs alongside modern spurious rationalists. Rather than merely providing an advantage, the experience emphasises achieving clarity amidst distractions. It serves as a reminder that awakening and enlightenment reflect a profound truth that remains very real, even in a sceptical and rational world. The phenomenon often parallels mystery traditions’ use of ecstatic travel via psychedelics alongside the miraculous experiences found in born-again Christians. However, differentiated by the qualitative needs of language that the new age provides as opposed to a more prophetic and mission interplay of Biblical Apocrypha or traditional mysteries.

.

Spiritual awakening is a transformative inner journey of realising one’s divine nature and unity with the universe, moving beyond ego to a higher consciousness, often through personal experience, meditation, and practices such as energy healing, leading to profound clarity, emotional shifts, and a deeper sense of purpose. However, it’s seen as a continuous unfolding rather than a final destination.  Even awakened individuals remain human, experiencing emotions and challenges, but with a more accepting, less attached perspective, acting normal within society, yet knowing there is sacredness to it.

Experiencing the alignment of Chakra openings can lead to profound insights and understanding, often described as gnosis. Individuals may become hypersensitive and perceive orbs of light surrounding their bodies. The grace of god is frequently associated with a blissful sense of love, causing one to feel as if they are being lifted away. This experience can create a deep understanding of harmony and connection with the physical world, along with physical sensations that may include pre-cognitive dreams and psychic abilities. These transformative experiences can occur suddenly, leading to an overnight shift in perception. Instead of feeling like a passive observer, individuals may develop a strong desire to actively contribute to improving the world.

Spiritual awakening is a significant truth that reminds us that awakening and enlightenment are profound realities, even in a sceptical, rational world. In this context, there is a goal driven by the desire to improve the world, not through purely rational choices, but by tapping into deeper emotional connections. This awakening is fuelled by feelings of bliss and light, vis-à-vis our ace in the hole, in contrast to the motivations of techno-fascists, who often lack profound emotional spiritual experiences. This suggests that the elite may long to experience deeper emotions but are mostly limited to understanding rationality, dark magic (sorcery), ancient mythology, and the wealth generated by technocracy.

It’s clear that the tech-fascists have co-opted the language and core concepts of the new age, but they do so without fully understanding or experiencing true spiritual awareness. Instead, they adopt this language, along with its concepts and practices, to create a form of manifest destiny in space, using jargon associated with both technology and new-age beliefs. They fail to realise that genuine consciousness shifts are fundamentally opposed to this pursuit. The real advantage lies in the unique spiritual understanding that cannot be granted to those who are vulnerable to manipulation by their adversaries. Rather than engaging in a non-profitable exploration of ethics and morality, they would rather compromise their principles for technological advancement. As a result, we see a combination of reconstituted neoliberal ideas that prioritise profit over genuine spiritual growth.

Neoliberal democracies claim they are uplifting countries and bringing them into a better, more just society. This narrative is often framed against communism to justify its interference in other cultures, a justification that dates back to the Cold War and continued even after its end. The U.S. maintained this logic into the 2000s, particularly during the War on Terror, justifying the invasion of Afghanistan as a mission to stop terrorism, while also framing it as a moral duty to liberate women and girls from the supposedly backward and misogynistic Taliban.

This American intervention was deemed necessary to save Middle Eastern women through the lens of Western values. It follows a science-fiction archetypal motif of a post-sacristy utopia, despite its supposed evolution, running on the same logic: selling the dream of a better tomorrow while discreetly deciding who gets to build that future and who owns it. Similarly, modern tech billionaires continue this cycle of exploitation and justification. We see it real in time in Trumps’ administration that has started a war with Venezuela for its oil reserves. The costs to humans and the natural environment are often ignored. Yet, they are treated as necessary sacrifices to bring humanity towards its destiny—whether that means uploading consciousness to servers or travelling to the stars.

Marc Andreessen equates a Tech Manifest Destiny; not into a new west but into the stars, given space a false hyper-real assumption, and there is no more west to conquer – tech manifest destiny is all about effective accelerationism. A movement towards having a pro-technology stance, and assumes anything is justified in the pursuit of that creation. Their main crux argues that there is no restriction on their approach to technological progress. It pretends to have an ethical premise to overcome climate change, poverty, and conflict, but at its core are merely justifications for pursuing an expansive project with no limits on cost or regulation. In that pursuit, it ironically destroys its supposed ethical promise.  

The pursuit of fictional science fiction concepts in artificial intelligence and transhumanism is a false promise. This is not merely a lack of imagination; rather, it reflects something predetermined (a false fact) already written in the fabric of time. Consequently, what remains is the commodification of these false promises, which are treated as prophecies for power and legacy. It is not just about gaining credit for technologies they believe will eventually exist; it is about playing the role of the Wizard behind the curtain, distracting the masses while advancing their collective agenda. They aim to emerge from their hidden underground bunkers and rebuild civilisation. This reconstruction, born of the collapse they have engineered through capitalism, will take the form of a utopian, neoliberal democracy.

The Abundance movement derives its name from the New Age movement and emerged as a response to Trumpist fascism. However, it often blames progressive policies and social movements for being distractions or obstacles to economic growth. This movement advocates fewer regulatory frameworks, arguing that liberal cities, designed to promote equity and protect vulnerable populations, are part of the problem because they detract from genuine economic innovation. The Abundance movement seeks to eliminate these regulations and allow tech companies to operate without oversight. This ideology has the backing of Silicon Valley leaders, who are effectively handing control over to the oligarchs responsible for the current challenges we face. Ultimately, it reflects out-dated neoliberal ideas of trickle-down economics, rebranded for the Techno-bro era, and is packaged for Democrats who increasingly resemble a right-wing neoliberal party reminiscent of the past.

.

The Abundance Movement aims to create a world of plenty through policy, while its New Age counterpart focuses on experiencing abundance through belief. Both pursue the concept of “abundance,” but they take very different approaches. Trickle-down economics, promoted by proponents who resemble techno-Ponzi schemers, offers a misleading promise of abundance that will supposedly materialise once their technological dreams are fulfilled. This approach often repeats the same false promises of compliance, whether it’s about rebuilding solidarity with working people, uplifting immigrants, or protecting marginalised communities. Instead of genuinely addressing the capture of our institutions by fascist ideologies, it further empowers them—not through an overtly antagonistic political party, but through one that is deeply compromised.