Normal Behaviour in an Apocalyptic World:

.

.

---

.

Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – a Double Edge Sword [Posted initially on 14th July 2023]: Philosophical symbolic utilitarian mysticism often expresses itself in the impossible balance within our human qualities, such as an example can be found in Biblical myth. Fifty days after Christ’s ascended, the Pentecost would arrive (this is God’s spirit delivered or Sophia and Prudence’s promise in (Ephesians 1) – this is commonly known as a gnostic awakening or a Pentecostal illumination, an act (or gnosis or wisdom) that illuminates within the hearts of man (the light and the way). Pentecost, a term generally associated with Protestantism or evangelicalism, was associated with a movement that started while Christians were hiding. Christ was the vehicle and the announcement of the coming of the Pentecost and the Holy Spirit, the illumination. It is represented as the spirit of God moving and symbolically associated with the ‘breath’ [Pneuma]: he breathed on them and said to them, ‘Receive the Holy Spirit’.    

The global covid simulated false flag method for abating a virus in its reasoning impart wearing a mask, knowing all too well the evidence to such methods does not match common sense and the reasoning against it. It was a worldwide symbolic representation of masking the breath or pneumonia, masking the Holy Spirit and the truth. The struggle of our brain’s left and right hemispheres indicates the struggle of our polarised governed reality, which is fine. However, when the balance becomes too weighted on one side, it becomes a problem. Hating and loving something to a degree are forms of worship; we are imbuing things with a co-creative faculty that most of us are unaware of. We are changing the world as we perceive it, and our perceptions are being manufactured by external stimuli such as hoaxes [with varying degrees of truth embedded in them] like the virus (false flag operations), ideologies, Hegelianism, etc.   

Such external forces are often connected with technology as a double-edged sword; we are reminded that certain technologies do not progress linearly or optimistically. It is merely a technology humans can use for whatever purpose, such as a vaccine or immunization for our newborns and influenza patients. Ignorant of our complacency but open to unquantifiable uncertainties, we ignored the limitations of vaccines as a technology and that they cannot lead. Furthermore, such an effect opened it up to dangerous and romantic gestures, a corporate covid endeavour (for the pharmaceutical industry). We were led to believe in lies because we thought technology could not make mistakes, or we believed in a technology that does not exist or made it look like that technology exists. This impossible balance is significantly linked to earlier cosmic significances and human existence.  

Steiner invoked in his revelation about a cosmic being called Ahriman; he examined that superstition science [or scientific superstitions] was the illusion and means employed by Ahriman. Humans and their different groups are at odds, as seen in our modern-day political arena. [“These Ahrimanic powers are at work wherever disharmonies between groups’ people arise” – Steiner]. Ahriman is the name of the evil principle as portrayed in Zoroastrianism. Also, by contrast, Ahriman is responsible for our mechanical ingenuity and technical inventions [Ahriman’s technologies].

Ahriman is also different to Lucifer (and Lucifer, the morning star or light bringer, often gets disconnected from the fallen Angel Samyaza and is perceived as Satan, a name derived from Saturn). Ahriman is closer in association with the Demiurge as well as Satan. In the gnostic sense, the Demiurge [commonly known as our creator God or God] acts similar to Satan or is Satanic in some sense. The leader of the fallen Angels is associated with the title of Lucifer; these fallen angels, often called Watchers, would show or educate humans about technology. And in that, Ahriman and Lucifer share the title that inspires technology but are seemingly distinct. Lucifer is seen as the overseer within this cosmic technology project to give humans, and undoubtedly, Ahriman oversees Lucifer – or is likened to Lucifer, the project manager, and Ahriman, the stakeholder. Gnosticism worldview is based on the spiritual rebellion against God, at which God is not the True God, but the Demirgue. This conflict or imbalance juxtaposes rebellious Christian groups vs. Traditional Christian Orthodoxy; a debate ensues about whether there is a God beyond God. Furthermore, even at the earliest historical cosmic significant event from the very moment, we were given technology alongside the Christ event. Jewish authors were inherently gnostic even before Gnosticism became a thing, which they coded in hymns, notably in Pslams.   

You will see how this imbalance systematically and semantically, in one way or another, finds itself fractioning every denomination and every religion. Furthermore, this is not the kind of struggle that appoints doubt in Art and democracy, which has positive aspects – this is the type of imbalance that confuses religion as a whole and core cult belief systems. For instance, the Jewish God, Yahweh, mistakenly gets associated with the Demiurge as Yahweh, but Yahweh is represented as Saturn [Satan]. As we know, the Demiurge is not inherently Satanic but only acts as Satanic, and the Demiurge is above Saturn. Already, there is confusion about the roles and which true title belongs to which archetypal gods. Yahweh, the God who kills Moses, after which Moses’s successor is Joshua, and it’s Joshua who brings the Jewish people to the Promised Land.

Why did Yahweh [God] kill Mosses in Deuteronomy 34? Mosses claims Manna ‘from heaven’ Man + NA is Sodium, which also means salted fish of the Portuguese, but in Egypt, it’s salted Fish People. In other words, cannibalism was involved; canninite/cannibalism – eating the flesh and drinking the blood of Christians, Moses wanted to prolong his 120-year-old age. Moreover, anybody conducting cannibalism is prohibited in the Promised Land, so Joshua had to wipe and clean him in the river. Joshua means Yeshua means Jesus. In John 8:44, Jesus tells Sadducees and Pharisees that they guard the gate and do not let the people and that they worship the devil. And this is why Jesus continues to challenge Moses’s law. The New Testament imparts that ‘I came here to uphold the Law’ in all sincerity; it’s Yahweh who upholds his Law with Moses by killing him at the foot of Mount Nebo by putting a death curse. Furthermore, it’s no coincidence that the Book of Psalms (Psalm 47) is Gnostic as it claims ‘for the Lord most high is terrible’ [the Lord Most High in this analysis is Yahweh] and that God [True-God] is a different Deity altogether. Of course, Deuteronomy 34 is censored as Exodus 4 with the moralities of circumcision practices; maybe cannibalism is too much for Sunday school.  

How does one come to terms with this imbalance? Are we to believe in miracles? Manna (food) fell from heaven; no technology is being taught here, and we were asked to believe in miracles. Biblical censorship is, for the better, the choice between knowing and advocating a theory of truth for the public as opposed to a censored private personal established scripture. The latter invokes freeing oneself from a place where they are the only one who knows – and the quality in which an intuitive moment of clarity is seen as godlike or as babblings of a demented mythical conspiracy theorist. The other implies censoring mythical attributes that may be beyond human quality understanding. In that regard, it comes from a place of love, which involves a state of being, which may be a gift from the gods, whether religious or mythological.      

In our modern-day predicament, how does a historical cosmic event regarding technology given to us by fallen angels impart this impossible balance? The spirits (fallen Angels) who fell are the spirits who teach, whether it’s to make swords, knives and shields to run a civilisation – let us not forget they also taught the secrets of magic. These spirits favoured teaching women intermingled with a sexual component coupled with the fall; it became central to Western magic and witchcraft. Furthermore, by their fall, they are fleshed or embodied in the physical; they do not remain in the sky. Moreover, to fall also means to fall in battle; these men of renown were part of the battle in Heaven and would bring that battle onto Earth. War is the hallmark of myths as well as empires and civilisations.   

Normally, we believe these non-canonical tellings of spirits who fell and taught humankind technology with a positive zeal. Alongside the very dualist nature of scripture, meaning good angels exist. The spirits who fell helped humans unlock the thinking faculty of man and his imagination, which would impact every step of civilisation. Suppose you see each step as an archetypal keyframe in time in which certain types of technology are made apparent for that time. Such a claim can otherwise reduce human achievements and be given into spiritual external factors. In doing so, it tunnels our intuition into superstition and positions the world into something self-referential into a delusion. It’s only ironic if we see myth parables as truth and not as superstition. Maybe a better way of framing it, post-original contact, is through the attendant spirit that inspires human faculty and guides us throughout civilisations. It’s slightly different from fallen angelic teachers because such attendant spirits impose themselves within our co-creative faculty, which has implications for how we perceive the world.

Angel magic is complex and weird; you’re not ordinarily dealing with good angels that sit on your shoulder because you have to acknowledge memory and how memory works. So much has happened between 3500 B.C. to our present time. These fallen Angels, seen as demoted celestial hierarchies who snuck out through the back door at times, were once alien teachers and various forms of gods of the mighty dead were brought back into Christianity in the form of angelic figures. Fast forward to the Enlightenment era at the height of theosophy, and at the backdrop of a technological, industrial revolution, Alice Baily flipped the narrative and turned the fallen angels into romantic heroes (sinless), reviving a secret cult that had been dormant. These demoted angels that snuck out at the back door become the ‘lords of sacrifices’; their sacrifice is in the form of martyrs as they become mortal to bring about a grand divine plan of evolution. They convinced themselves that their purpose was by the decree of God. Furthermore, it would seem the Elites, governed leaders, cult groups, secret societies, and tech billionaires would align themselves with these newly reborn fallen spirits.

In the previous post, we explored … how one expresses their humanness, If not to live our lives, struggling with the dynamic of an impossible balance – through what is perceived as normal behaviour. Seeking normal behaviour also means seeking equilibrium. Intrusions from spirits through technology have disrupted that balance, whether that balance is to seek equilibrium or within the balance of life and death. The catalyst is the technology and its capacity to morph itself within the enormous mechanisms of government structures and national security services. Furthermore, it is intensely focused and dependent on practical leadership activities of complex humanism interwoven among gatekeepers and cultists. 

Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – Inventing Gods, Angels & the Greatest Trick the Devil Ever Pulled: We have established that Lucifer is not Satan; we also concluded that Satan refers to (a Planet) Saturn (the Stargate Celestial) or Athoth, also Draco. Saturn is the outermost planet; it is the stargate, the gateway from the imprisonment of the Archons (earth planet) and into the Stars into the heavens and passing Kronis (Saturn) into infinite time.

For a while, there was so much focus made by Christian-Conspiracy-theorists that the culprits for a worldwide conspiracy […] are Satanic or Luciferic based. In doing so, they created a type of Golem; instead of being made out of clay, it was made out of a manifestation of their imagination, traditionally in its simplistic form, a Red Beast with Horns. It intended to provoke anti-Christ imagery, a nightmare in their minds; raptured by their horror, they figured that the world must see this apocalypse. Their direction is correct regarding the provocation of a nightmare, but the direction for truth hardly sits on an arrow of linear causality; it veers off in many directions. Lucifer is rebellious, defies God, and is said to be associated with Samyaza, the fallen angel of pride. However, given his association with Venus (Adonaiou) as the morning star, its association is only in the fall. He is a light inspiration, the thinking faculty of imagination, the Promethean fire and light bringer. 

An imbalance comes to light about etymologies referenced from that period alongside its modern meaning. Also, confusion in names and titles complicates narrowing the names and their lineage down to a singular figure. Given the complex lineage, who is Lucifer? Lucifer may indeed be Mithra; there is limited factual data to indicate this other than the meaning of Eosphorus (which means light-bringer), and in Orphic cosmogony, the god of creation is Phanes, which translates to ‘bring the light’ and is Latin for Lucifer. Phanes also shares his archetype with Mithras. While Phanes is Latin for Lucifer, his myth is about creating a universe, which aligns more with Demiurge or even Ahriman.     

Mithraism was a religion created out of necessity and, therefore, not natural, not as a mythical institution that evolved throughout time. Scholars believe it was invented in early Rome and that Mithraism as a religion was created for the empire when the Roman Republic gave way to the empire. Seemingly parallels a secret religion that manifested around 1717 at the dawn of the British Empire with their fleets of boats that fell off from the earth, they created Freemasonry. They used it as a tool for the empire as a recruitment agency for evangelising other cultures that stood firm on their beliefs. However, those cultures were made intrigued by a persuasive argument that Christianity was not really what they believed in – and was a cover to hide the fact that they worshipped something else. They’ve made a template to gain other cultures’ favour and, by having their ear, called out their true religion, Mithraism, and Mithras as their idol. With Mithras, they have more room to embed their anti-Christ zeal than its parallel Lucifer, whose name already has full meaning.

Soon, this secret cult group started to morph into the state cult of that time, Sol. The idol Sol was a figure that replaced old pantheon gods such as Jupiter, Juno, Apollo, etc. Sol became a proto-monotheistic cult figure for the Sun. Both (Mitra) Sol and Mithras were embedded within the arts and framework of cultural Rome.

While these godheads share the same mythical concepts of light, they also share drastically different contexts in their semantics. Mithras and Perseus share the same notion of killing the Bull, but their motivation is different; Mithras is more ritualistic. Killing the Bull of Heaven was done to create the world. Perseus kills the Bull (Taurus) because the Bull represents being imprisoned in time (the Zodiac) – to which Perseus wishes to escape. Perseus is a demi-god, while Mithras and Phanes are gods. Perseus gains power through the technology gifted by Hermes. Both Lucifer and Perseus are about escaping the bondage of God or defying God and defying the limitation of time and achieving immortality. Perseus kills the Bull (Taurus), which raises the celestial hierarchy. He then rises out of the Zodiac and transcends time into Cepheus. Lucifer defies God by ascending Tartarus into Earth, and the ascent back to the Stars would be imbued in Mithras.   

Previously, we described the choice between a gnosis moment where you either advocate a theory of truth for the public or a censored private personal epiphany. The latter invokes freeing oneself from a place where they are the only one who knows – and the quality in which an intuitive moment of clarity is seen as godlike or as babblings of demented mythical-conspiracy-theorist. We can argue for an intuitive synchronistic mysticism, but it must also pass reason for thought and be free from instrumental reasoning and utilitarianism.

And because we have shared knowledge, it’s neither godlike nor demented; Northrop Frye once said: “There are no uncritical loyalties,” and therefore criticism is a positive strength; that criticism which, Octavio Paz says: “unfold the possibility of freedom and in this an invitation to action.” These are like sets of elements that help our way through society. Even with our myriad tension and opposing qualities, these are hardly criticisms but closer to theories, which can invite doubt. The separation between Phanes, Mithras, and Persuas is apparent, so it leaves the question of who Lucifer is. It is a being of ambiguity. This leaves Lucifer/Mithras more of an archetype and shows that the real veneration for secret cult groups is with fallen angels.

In immortal, Theseus channels Perseus – after killing the Bull is rewarded a technology by the gods, he gets an invite to be one with the gods (he transcends time) after he kills Hyperion.

.

In the modern setting, Lucifer would be a beacon for Christian-conspiracy-theorists manifested golem and a convenient byproduct for the elites who worship the watchers as all the uproar is focused in the wrong direction. The intent is made powerless when the focus is not on target; a clear distraction, not by their making, never the less was there to take advantage of, which they did. Manifested in their imagination and led by clueless conspiracy theorists who continue to spur out that the big bad is the Illuminati groups, Satanism and Luciferianism. They all fail the litmus test, or must they be guided in the right direction to make them realise a truer interpretation? For the moment, they’re falling for the greatest trick the devil ever pulled.

How clueless conspiracy theorists view Satanism is through horror and the glorification of shock value, like followers of Anton Lavey or fans of rock metal musicians. After any crime or murder that has a hint of shock value is seen on the news, the blame ultimately gets appointed to a loner wearing a metal shirt. The media has entrained the public’s obsessions with mob rule to its simplistic reasoning. For a while, there was the claim that there was space for Satanisim to be safe by advocating that they worship not a diety but a figure of literature. A person who embraces Satanism, though not identifying as a Satanist, embodies a postmodern perspective, as the term “Satanist” symbolises a boundary against traditional religions.

A synopsis that fits better to actual Satanists [neoliberals, corporate oligarchies, political, media and educational establishments] if they ever feel the pressure of getting found out who they really are and who they worship (Fallen Angels). It’s a statement they can use as it raises superstition notions and reverence to rationalism and scepticism because it has all the hallmarks of utility and is therefore used for distraction, but ultimately not what they believe.

Secret Cult groups would never associate themselves with Satanism, the type of Satanism Christian conspiracy theorists view it as. This type of Satanism would have a reactionary effect, a low-key tangent movement called Satanic-Panic where fundamentalists like Tex Mars and Jack Chick would go about propagandising. Established Churches, conservative or otherwise, had no interest in that satanic movement or disassociated themselves from what Satanic Panic spokes-groups and what the media was propagandising. However, it did take over Hollywood in the late 70s and early 80s with the rise of slasher/horror films. And that energy allowed them to introduce their secret rituals to the public through events, hoaxes, entertainment, etc. As a result, Christian conspiracy theorists would double down in their culprit pointing but are still wrong, but are left entrained and dismayed and subconsciously initiated.     

Watcher cult groups believe that worshipping the spirits of the fallen (angels) and gaining their favour through communion, rituals, and ritual magic would help them escape mortality through technology, thereby achieving immortality – and by doing this, they must help fallen spirits get back into the hierarchal positions amongst the stars. Mithras is seen as the god of contracts and mutual obligation, and given cult groups’ initiation, a pact with ritual comes with swearing an oath, which comes from Mithras, for he is the god of oath. It’s fitting given how managerialism in a Faustian sense (deal with the devil) has been a tool for totalitarianism in our modern time and seems to prevail even amidst a collapse, you know, like a double-edged sword.

Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – Artificial Intelligence, Transhumanism and Tech-Sorcery: At the height of UFO popularity in the early 80s and mid-90s, conspiracy theorists claimed that technology was being backward-engineered from UFO crash sites. Whether you believe this or not, the rise of technological progress strangely came after World War 2, and the centre point of attraction concerning crash sites was Roswell and the secret military base area 51. From military planes to advances in computers and communications technology, it was believed (at least on the conspiracy side) that created circuitry artifacts were the inspiration for growth in transistors, CPUs, and computers.

In other circles, they claim the first solid-state transistor was guided by outside influences, which pertain to spirits and ritual magic. It gives new meaning to the saying: Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. There is nothing new here; many historical figures of significance had an attendant spirit whispering in their ear. The only difference was that they were not conjuring them; they were chosen. Those who do the ritual are making a Faustian bargain, and there is always a time the devil collects. Of course, when technology can no longer advance or move beyond the theory page or even be replicated, technology borrows religious faith, and the result manifests itself in scientism, which is indistinguishable from sorcery. 

Scientism imparts faith in their technology, but it’s also Satanic, especially concerning its philosophy in the belief that science is a good substitute for God. Not as heavy as Nietzsche’s “God is Dead” headline, this was a warning about what happens when you do away with faith. With increased competition and funding, the emphasis on reproducing research needs to be revised and revised. This results in a reproducibility crisis, which has generally led the public’s confidence in science to waver; this can undermine the entire enterprise.  

There are many Scientism projects, one in particular, Transhumanism, which cannot even be produced, let alone replicated. The idea of Transhumanism goes against God in the sense that it goes against the natural cycle of life and death. Transhumanism is a seemingly science-fiction concept, but it is seen as a viable option for ageing elites, but ultimately a carrot in the immortality stick. This means that Transhumanism will never be realised, given the evidence and the sheer ridiculousness of the project’s aim or objective. Nevertheless, this hopeful utility is used to snag grant money for Transhumanisim’s goal and its side projects – like cryogenics, artificial intelligence, and robotics. However, all their projects cannot lead and seemingly act as a messianic movement, which seems to offer us salvation in the motto just around the corner, a slogan like that of the true believer.  

Strangely, though, one of their prominent true believers is found in their opposite: Christian-conspiracy-theorist of the anti-Catholic kind. In their disdain for transhumanism/posthumanism endeavour (but secretly believe in it), in a sense, it’s true as it drives their reactionary purpose. They are often blinded by their goals of spreading fear porn (about AI and Transhumanism) rather than approaching it with a truer sensibility, an honest investigation. They usually remark in their analysis of transhumanism through the implication of ethics and philosophy, but what does not get mentioned is that their approach is coated with a fundamentalist cover.

Technological singularity is a theoretical moment when artificial intelligence will have progressed to greater-than-human intelligence, radically changing civilisation and human nature. Artificial intelligence with awareness being born in a sea of information or singularity is a pipe dream; it will never come true. It’s the Demiurge bashing at the glass firmament of the upper Pleroma; it’s the fallen angel spirits wanting to escape their Archonic imprisonment (Tartars); it’s Thor bashing his hammer at the glass ceiling; it’s secret cult groups wishing to be gods, the literal ‘ye shall be gods” endeavour, and so forth. Artificial Intelligence, as we know it, is just an advanced programmable application, and robotics engineering coming off Boston dynamics are fake CGI renderings and hardly the science-fiction notions we romanticise in films like Matrix and Terminator films. Its science’s eschatological version of last things is often employed to drive and give credence to the transhumanism program.   

Transhumanism parallels creation myth stories predominantly about the creator-god in which He attempted to create proto-type human life but kept failing until He (GOD) breathed into him (Adam) His spirit with the blessing of the Mother (tricking Yaldabaoth) and the first Adam awoke. As humanity spread, He became Jealous as he realized humans had within them the spark of spiritual light, which has access to the upper Pleroma that the creator-God did not. Transhumanism is man’s attempt to bring down a cosmic event by mimicking creation myth stories as a mere technological project. It’s part of God’s failure, the creation of a Golem, the proto-type man before He breathed life into it – that will match transhumanism failure. And that is because the substance that gave the mindless substance (Golem) a soul was the breath of God – and like at the start of this essay, we described the breath or [Pneuma] as a symbolic representation of the Holy Spirit (as in the spirit of God moving). 

Fundamentalist-Christian-Conspiracy-theorists claim Transhumanism endeavours parallel revelation 13:15 after the image of the Beast (I suspect an empty vessel Golem) is brought forth (or built using technology); a False-Prophet (Lucifer/Mithras/Peruses, etc.) will give breath [Pneuma] to the image of the Beast. There is also the mention of the abomination of desolation (Golem) mentioned in Matthew 24.15-16, Which will come together in the Temple of Jerusalem, where it will come to life through ritual. And that this ritualistic event mimics technocratic rituals and their artificial intelligence intentions. Transhumanism is waiting on the technological advancement of singularity as justification or proof for the experiment to work. Like before, ‘it will never happen.’ The False Prophet (leader of the fallen Angels) breathes into the artificial intelligence Image. We will not bring forth an Adam with spirit, but ‘the Beast’; however, we know this is impossible because singularity is the catalyst. Moreover, the singularity is purely fictional, and there is no stretching this fictional type to asymmetry or symmetry; it’s just a fact.  

The False Prophets equates to fallen angel spirits (leaders of the fallen angels being the false prophets), and ritual practices were used during medieval times. Where communion (or breath is used as an impetus) with the spirits through empty human vessels. These practices coincide with modern MK-Ultra practices because the results are more apparent, rather than claiming that Satan’s great agenda is to produce its own Golem out of the human race and that we might abandon the image of God. It can be concerning, given that we inherited the image of God through the first Adam image, and there is a responsibility not to debase it. However, framing it so it is vulnerable to some attack or invasion is inaccurate. When the Spartans destroyed Athens, Athens’s citizen-based experiment was also destroyed, despite this experimental society’s uncertainty, costs, and complexity. Athen’s citizens did not abandon it. A product of Athenian civic education created a leader in Thrasybulus. He, with his citizens, drove the utilitarian dictatorship out.

I suggest avoiding getting caught up in the romanticised language of fundamentalism. The idea that an army of technological Golems, who have abandoned the energised God and are energised by the breath of a false prophet, will invade and rule like a dictatorial force is absurd. We understand that God failed to create Adam without the divine spark. Therefore, this Golem enterprise will also fail if it can succeed rationally. Our public service, civic education, democracy, and sense of restraint will remain resilient against the technocratic romanticism of false prophets and AI Golems, which seem to be driven by wealth-based economics and self-interest. Moreover, the false prophet’s attempts to breathe life into something do not compare to the breath of the Creator God. Even God Himself was deceived by His Mother, suggesting that there is an essence of the spirit of Sophia within everyone. This implies that the essence of the upper Pleroma is far greater than anything into which the false romanticised breathes.     

What I mean is that we shouldn’t get swept up in the romanticised rhetoric of fundamentalism. The idea that an army of technological Golems, who have abandoned the image of God and are energised by the words of a false prophet, will rise and rule like a dictator is absurd. We know that God failed in His attempts to create Adam without that divine spark, so this Golem endeavour will also falter if we entertain the notion that it could succeed. Our public service, civic education, democracy, and self-restraint will likely be resilient against the technocratic romanticism promoted by false prophets and AI Golems, which often mask wealth-based interests and self-serving motives. Moreover, the false prophet’s attempts to breathe life into something are not comparable to the breath of the Creator. Even God Himself was deceived by His Mother, suggesting that within each of us lies a fragment of the spirit of Sophia. This indicates that the essence of the upper Pleroma is far more significant than anything the false prophet can animate.

Transhumanism’s philosophy is based on a fear of death by those who have not been struck by the Light of Grace and, in their uncertainty, build types of Golems thinking they can transfer their consciousness into them. And to live forever in a digital environment of their making or as androids for many reasons, some being to delay judgement or reincarnation, but ultimately a fictional techno imprisonment for the soul. A ritualistic (of the revelation kind) played out as a technocratic religion. It also has something to do with corporatism (of the money laundering kind), which is included in private and governmental grants. As convincing as they are, even in their fake laid-out project management plans, transhumanism can only come true in fiction.          

So we have fundamentalist-Christian-Conspiracy-theorists creating a Golem of their own, manifested in their imagination, in its simplistic form, a Red Beast with a Horn. Horror and glorifying shock value would manifest in the paranoid Christians of the Satanic Panic movement. It’s the fundamentalist-Christian-Conspiracy groups that gave Transhumanism a way out – through their type of Satanism. All blame and intent get pointed to the red beast with horns, and the real culprits or opposition (watcher cults) go about undisclosed. We also have Artificial intelligence and Transhumanism, the promise of a second-coming singularity, and the act of swapping consciousness from a human body to technological Golems – in this false realisation of end-time singularity. The False-Prophet breath into the image/Golem is a ritual based on revelation and creation myth reproduced by the corporate backing of Watcher Cults, who worship fallen angels.

There is an imbalance that Ghostics see clearly; it’s not Satan’s agenda to produce its own Golem out of the human race. Its various cult groups (humans) take orders or make contracts and bargains from fallen angelic beings in favour of technology and immortality, and in their corporation, are masterfully socially engineering the population through various programs like transhumanism. As we know, Satan is not what Satanism views it as; fundamentalist uses their type of Satan Golem as a way to point at an imagined entity, an appropriate opposition to steer away from that very fact that their God might also be the Creator-God or the Demiruge who at times act Satanic who wants to be the highest. Fundamentalists’ use of Satan-Golem is fitting for them as they cannot go beyond their orthodoxy of only one God paradigm as opposed to having a True God (One-Parent) who is above God (Jehova).

.

.