Mystics & Artist-Prophets:

.

---

.

Superpowers – Economic Game of Thrones: So, in the last post, we discussed the failures of instrumental reason, or rather, it does not exist, and also discussed utilitarianism being used as reason will fail. Such causes can have a split in reason, to which Agrippa’s method helps us or rather engenders Kant & Baudrillard’s observation of simultaneously accepting both rational and irrational. Agrippa came to reconcile his split in reason with the Church alongside a proto-protestant interest in magic (mystical faiths). That magic would be the method by which one reconciles oneself with God. A view that McKenna shares, though, his idea is about the redemption of the world through magic.

This suggests that certain Western civilisations are fundamentally corrupt, with goodness buried beneath these corrupt layers. Our flawed system, the metaphorical Egregore, is destined to collapse, repeating the cycle experienced by other civilisations that have risen and fallen throughout history. In this rational framework, the lifeblood of our system is our economy. The current U.S. Empire is in decline; it integrated the Northeast, the Midwest, and the Southern states, which resolved the issue of slavery with its abolition during the late British Empire period. The growth of capitalism followed the emancipation of enslaved individuals, who were never compensated for the years they were treated as property. With no competitors, capitalism accumulated vast wealth. However, over a century of exceptional growth, signs of trouble emerged. For the past forty years, wealth redistribution has primarily benefited the privileged elite, facilitated by various methods, including changes to tax laws that favour the wealthy.

The distinction between capital and labour had never been more defined due to stagnant wage distribution, meaning any wage increase would have no bearing if the cost of products also increased. The last real wage increase stopped in the 70s, and because of a lack of real wages, banks started handing out loans and credit cards, creating a country that was in debt. It was never a solution. As productivity grew, the wages were still flat. In this apparent inequality, they produced crisis/hoax scenarios that further propelled people into dystopia: the coronavirus, rising inflation and interest rates.

A strange parallel is unfolding, resembling the economic despair that contributed to the rise of fascist ideology at the end of World War I. The German working class, believing they were building a new Empire, experienced dissolution after their defeat. This led to rampant inflation in Germany, followed by a severe depression. In this atmosphere of collective despair, they rallied behind a failed artist who transformed himself into a charismatic speaker, ultimately paving the way for fascism and Nazism. Similarly, in the contemporary United States, issues such as healthcare, wages, homelessness, and racism create a landscape that mirrors the economic disparity of the past. In this climate, demagogues have emerged, positioning themselves as leaders promising salvation. When corporatism aligns closely with the government’s self-interest, it can lead to totalitarianism, where elections, the Senate, and public debates become increasingly detached from genuine populism, devolving into false populism and, eventually, empire.

As empires decline, they often take their allies down with them. In Australia, despite having a robust universal health care system, the government strongly encourages the adoption of private insurance. The government even subsidizes insurance companies by billions of dollars, based on the rationale that it reduces the burden on the public system. This means taxpayers effectively fund subsidies that benefit those with private health coverage while uninsured individuals continue to pay taxes without any benefits. Data shows that private insurance does not alleviate the pressure on hospitals, especially regarding reducing waiting lists. It contributes to inequality and harms public health systems, diverting resources from public care to private enterprises. While healthcare corporations and CEOs profit from these policies, the reduction in surplus means that even higher profits can be achieved. This policy was implemented by a short, conservative prime minister who held office for 11 years. His tenure is characterized by poor decisions and unwise policies that squandered Australia’s wealth.

The current US tactics are pretty much the playbook of this odious Australian politician, though less extreme in its execution. Nevertheless, this little [Napoleon Complex] guy originated that template tactic. He introduced the Border Protection Bill; he also aligned with Bush on the supposed war on terror post-September 11 against UN approval. As is the case, the sovereignty of Australian waters was merely a PR opportunity for future oncoming elections. Illegals on boats seeking asylum inland were victims of conjured fake news about babies being thrown overboard for political points against the morals of immigrants on board. This was a proto-culture war that spurred debate among the Australian populace. This guy introduced border control, GST taxes, work choices, citizenship tests, and the Workplace Relations Act, which reduced union control and Negative Gearing in real estate. Negative gearing created highly inflated housing prices, which no normal young people in the future can achieve or buy. And, of course, Australian conservatives blame it on immigration rather than this stupid policy that only empowered landowners and oversees owners monopolising the housing markets. He balanced social leftist concerns with a centre-right earnestness that allowed him to stay in power for so long.

Australia’s abundant reserves of coal and other mineral resources were outsourced to the Chinese government in 2000. By 2012, this arrangement had generated $188 billion solely from gas exports. Former Prime Minister John Howard squandered these funds by failing to invest in future wealth through research and development, education, and renewable energy. Instead, he used the revenue to implement tax cuts, such as raising the corporate tax rate by six percentage points and reducing the income tax rate at the end of his tenure. As a result, many are still questioning what happened to $1.3 trillion of Australian wealth. Furthermore, most mining companies operating in Australia are foreign entities, and three-quarters of their profits are sent abroad rather than reinvested in the Australian economy.

International currency has always been measured against the US dollar; this is no longer the case as the Chinese dollar has become as stable as gold. Countries define themselves in their GDP, and the currency of the People’s Republic of China shows all the signs of a rising empire up against a declining one in the US. The US’s conflict against Russia is just for propaganda as its real competitor is its ally China; throughout the years, it has orchestrated warfare; currently, Ukraine is a victim country between economic powerhouses that are playing economic games of thrones. Who wants to weaken the ally of China, “Russia.”

Although they are called the CCP, China’s wealth has been built on socialism. Unlike other countries, they did not achieve their wealth through invasions or strategically placing military bases worldwide. Instead, they welcomed and promoted capitalist enterprises within China. The wealth generated here is distributed between the private sector and the state, unlike the United States, where wealth has become increasingly concentrated in private and corporate hands. In the US, government and taxpayer wealth have often been funnelled to the already affluent, while China maintains a balance between private and state ownership. Hong Kong emerged as a hub for Western trade, influencing the rest of China’s economic development.

To the detriment of the American people, Neoconservatives have narrowed the perception of China and communism to a single point in Stalin’s history, turning it into a symbolic evil bogeyman. Despite having a strong economy and a rich history marked by imperial rule and internal conflicts, including wars with the Mongols, China is aware of the empire’s failures. It finds itself in uncharted territory as it moves forward, yet it still prefers its cultural roots. From a Western perspective, China may not seem like an ideal place to live. However, aspects of its system could inform a robust social wing of Western democracy, particularly socialism. This understanding might represent the best possible approach to engaging with China.

Australia, having no backbone when it comes to foreign relations with the US, is stuck appeasing a Narcissistic big brother [U.S.] and also keeping equal footing with its most significant economic trade partner, China. Corporate oligarchies, taking the playbook of John Howard, blame immigration for the US’s despair; however, the result of a capitalist economy of 330 million people, that an undocumented 10 million of the poorest people in the US is the cause of their difficulties is stupid. The US is a very racist country, made evident by slavery, Klan & secret cult ties, conservatism and an uneducated right-wing populace that is all willing to believe this claptrap. Farmers left with no workers still voted for Trump on blind faith that people in power and governance are considering their concerns. Here lies the fundamental problem of blind faith and stupidity.           

It’s a concern, and as such, all demoralised persons should slowly be educated away from decades of right-wing propaganda because such a cure is possible by forms of disenchantment. It starts by pointing out robber barons’ philosophy that they are anarcho-capitalists for you in the adage “pull yourself up by the bootstraps” with no support for the government, no social safety net, you either sink or swim. However, for them, it’s about self-interest and profit that includes government support in corporate welfare, socialism for the rich and rugged individualism and capitalism for the poor. They get subsidies, tax cuts, corporate welfare checks and government contracts. Low-income people must find their way, exemplified further by denouncing social security altogether but keeping corporate welfare flowing. They want grants from the government in corporate welfare, while the rest of the people get none, yet the people pay the taxes that these guys would take from corporate welfare [absolute lunacy].        

In our previous discussion, we explored how utilitarianism is not a form of reasoning and how problems arise when utilitarianism is allowed to dominate in specific areas, such as the economy. This approach demonises, marginalises, and undermines non-utilitarian perspectives. Utility, unlike true thought or argument, often lacks depth. A billionaire named Marc Andreessen, who resembles a loathsome and stuttering version of Lex Luthor, exemplifies this by distorting truth and facts, as well as rewriting history to align with the utilitarian rationale that oligarchs use in pursuit of their dehumanising goals. For instance, he once claimed that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was “de-banking” people when, in reality, the Bureau was working to protect individuals from being de-banked. He also asserts that the American people are living under a form of FDR’s monarchy, even 80 years after FDR’s time, suggesting that FDR was merely replacing the DuPont monarchy. He hints at what he and his fellow oligarchs desire in his rhetoric: a demagogue, a malefactor of great wealth akin to Trump, to serve as their FDR-like placeholder King for a supposed fictional monarch.

The author characterises the Republic as a monarchy without a leader, explicitly referencing Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR), and argues that this is a misleading and fictional representation. The modern nation-state was created to replace monarchy and medieval systems, requiring a new framework to unify society differently. It was designed as “a rational, universally applicable code,” and subsequent laws have built upon this foundational concept of centralised administration. However, an important aspect that has been overlooked is the role of reason, mainly as programs have developed without a solid methodology, as seen in the case of neoliberalism.

He attempts to use history as a tool, portraying FDR as a type of King. In this view, this royal framework must encapsulate our capacity for reason. Consequently, all other human qualities are reduced to the title of King. This is a flawed interpretation, as the role of the federal government should be re-evaluated with every new leader; that is fundamental to the functioning of democracy. His argument is disingenuous because it implicitly advocates for a monarchical system without explicitly saying so. He suggests that we already live under such a system, lacking only FDR, and posits that the solution is to install a demagogic, malevolent King disguised as a President. These notions reflect a form of instrumental reasoning that dehumanises citizens and justifies treasury looting while undermining social security.   

There have always been billionaires that had sway in government behind the scenes, and due to our modern apocalyptic time, reality, shared knowledge, and conspiracy theories can put faces to these billionaires. Conspiracy theory, unfortunately, is collectively attached to right-wing worldview, c’est la vie. However, Agrippa, Kant and Baudrillard have implied one way or another that ideas, thoughts, opinions, and points of view don’t have to be dialectically polarised or pigeonholed one way – meaning one could be a leftist and have a clear understanding of conspiracy theory and reason.    

Superpowers – Gaia versus Egregore; [System versus Entities]: The failed assassin of Trump reassessed their strategy, shifting to Plan B: to become the salesman of a dismantled American Empire. This plan involves withdrawing from the world as a competitor, a course of action dictated by economic inevitability. The underlying reasoning highlighted in statements like “Drill Baby Drill” serves to mislead the public about the true intentions behind these policies, which are ultimately oriented towards failure. The narrative suggests that increased drilling will lead to more incredible wealth for Americans; however, the reality is that the United States cannot effectively compete in an OPEC-dominated oil market. Even if US production reaches a minimum price of $40 per barrel, OPEC can still profit by selling at $10 less. OPEC has the power to dismantle the US oil sector whenever it chooses but refrains from doing so to maintain price stability. Opting for competition in the hope that OPEC will reduce its prices is risky; OPEC could just as easily raise its prices, which would devastate the US oil industry, leading to plant closures and investor withdrawals. Many private sector billionaires—some of whom now hold positions in the US cabinet—are no longer invested in the success of the American economy, as their interests are global rather than national. This shift means they could drive the US energy sector into bankruptcy sooner rather than later, allowing them to acquire assets at a fraction of their worth.

Trump & Elon are puppets for OC GFC controllers of Global Financialised Capital – essentially the world’s superpower. For a while the military-industrial complex, which included the navy and military agencies in conjunction with independent government agencies, had more capital than a termite like Elon could ever gain influenced the policy of the US. It was a surprise when a new power emerged from the den of darkness, flexing its weight, the GFC. The MIC couldn’t account for trillions of dollars lost to defence sectors alongside conflicts, wars, corruption, and fraud that had accumulated. As a result, systemic shifts in the economy diversified from weapons of mass destruction to Digital & international platforms. China holds all the market value, like rare earth materials, to produce computers and circuit boards. The rhetoric of MAGA boasting about invasions and power between Russia, China and the US is propaganda when there is a symbiosis of economy at hand.  

The GFC shapes economic power and influences politics, and most of Tech Giant’s wealth comes from the GFC. Financialisation is fake money that integrates itself with pharma, healthcare, construction, mining and other sub-categories – driven by a-national groups or Oligarchs that corral together as diverse business interests for asset management firms like ‘Blackrock,’ Statestreet and Vanguard. Ultimately, work on global interest, not just one country or company. They control trillions of dollars alongside being connected to sovereign wealth funds worldwide that give them access to trillions more. This is why its odd robber baron oligarchs want to loot the government treasury as it has restrictions; it’s illegal.    

The populace will ultimately suffer the consequences of actions that were taken by their elites. The fall was going to happen, and it didn’t matter who was in the President’s role; Kamala and the Democrats would have slowed down the process, but ultimately, they were riding the tail end of this degradation and isolation of the empire. Populism, culture, and conspiracy theory without reason allowed a Western predatory [criminal class] capitalism to dictate the livelihoods of US citizens. Alongside culture and the civilisational peculiarities of the West, there is a symbiotic relationship and response to capitalism because of who they are. [What/who is the American populace?]. They put themselves on the chopping block, despite its inevitability considering the rise and fall of the empire.

Why aren’t they angry or in protest? Their ignorance and mistakes deflate half the populace who put a demagogue in power; furthermore, in their isolationism, they are apathetic. They agree with Trump as cults agree with their Guru. Even if it is towards a fascist movement, conspiracy theories without reason create echo chambers of sociopaths. It emboldens their inherited racism and frustrates and angers their inner demons towards their closet-ness latent homosexuality and fearfulness of transsexualism. The decline had to happen. It was inevitable, a fact agreed upon by fence sitters like Chris Hedges, who voted for the other instead of Harris or Trump. Who describes Harris as an inadequate leader and Trump as a symptom of deeper disillusionment of politics where they would rather vote for despair and anguish [a broken system] rather than any politics that builds something? Neoliberalism had alienated right-wing populists from government and civic engagement.     

There is no longer a true leftist reality; there is only right-wing and extreme-right-wing political base. The Clinton era distanced itself from traditional leftist positions and adopted a guise of Republicanism, leading the Republican Party to adopt far-right views. This shift has been further transformed by the rise of right-wing fundamentalism and cultism, which Trump later capitalised on. As a result, the establishment wing of the Republican Party merged with that of the Democratic Party. Many may not want to acknowledge it, but oligarchs have seized power at all levels, and what we are witnessing is merely a façade of democracy. The conflict is less about Democrats versus Republicans (or left versus right) and more about a battle between corporations and oligarchs. Corporatists seek stability and decorum within a democratic framework, while oligarchs thrive on chaos, aiming to dismantle the administrative state for a more raw form of capitalism through privatisation.         

As much as MAGA and Republicans are responsible for this decline in the West [by systemically changing nationalism into a neo-fascist movement] – here, it’s very necessary to be divisive because there is a clear difference between a leftist and democrat, but is both tunnelled left and does not exclude them from the same indoctrination and participation in the deception and deflection of that system. A system which we describe as the Egregore, a living system that implies we have no control over – is this just esoteric symbolic jargon or truths behaving as a piecemeal systemic illustration of them? ‘Yes’, GFC seems like a Titan compared to our capacity. The trick is to collectivise inside the rational system that is now in place and link the great truths and the building block illustrations. This can only be done if we have faith in the system to which our individuality with the collective, not ‘human capital’ [territory] belongs. The system is our rational backbone. The true system of nature is the concrete manifestation of the rational godhead, not a system built on numbers, GDP & corporate companies, and finance groups. We are rational because that natural system is – while utilitarianism and specialisation have roles as an organising principle, they undermine lateral thought and questioning.       

An example of instrumental divisiveness can be observed with DOGE, which harbours the misleading belief that it can replace established roles through its particular specialisation despite those roles having already been clearly mapped out. Proponents believed they could circumvent important checks and balances by promoting a false notion of expertise and responsibility, inevitably leading to layers of misguided assumptions. Their utilitarianism, presented as a methodological rationale, ultimately undermines the system’s wealth or diverts money into their own pockets. Furthermore, ideas must guide public policy for it to succeed, and this principle also applies to evolutionary organisms.

Not all of the populace is guilty of creating a class of national oligarchical elites whose private profit interests are no longer connected to the equilibrium nature of our system. Not all of the populace share in the creation of a psychopathic class of predators, but merely guilty of ignorance and limited knowledge where, for the most part, knowledge is concentrated at an elementary/primary level of education rather than the challenges of higher learning. At the same time, the rationality of universities inspires power rather than education. As a result, this new fascist movement that gestated from the Klan that swapped out swastikas for the cross and the mass recitations of the Pledge of Allegiance grounded in white supremacy merged on a national level. A bubble of ideology to which Trump exploited as he has none – the result of which had become anti-government fundamentalism and conspiracy theory without reason. However, they are all too willing to go along with having a utopian, like Tech, feudalist, networked state future.  

Superpowers – Elon; Neo-Demagogue; Power over Depredation of Guilt: Jean-Paul Sartre’s non-fiction work, “Saint Genet: Homosexuality,” presents the story of a character named Jean Genet in a way that resembles a novel. It describes a moment when a 10-year-old boy named Jean is caught by his adoptive parents while trying to take a cookie from a jar. In that instant, he’s accused of stealing, this marks a turning point for him. He stops being just a boy, someone with a clean slate and endless potential, and instead becomes defined as “Jean Genet.” But who is Jean Genet? At no point does the entire town truly understand who he is—a question that remains fundamental even in adulthood, let alone for a child. Jean is made to feel fear and shame, branded by the community as a “thief.” He recalls this period of his life as if it only lasted an instant, yet it left a lasting impact on his identity.

Unaware like a pre-lapsarian Adam free in his imaginative consciousness is shot back to earth in an instant awakening. Ignorant of the world, he can only acknowledge and agree with his actions. He reveals that he is a thief and pleads guilty, overwhelmed by an undeniable truth: he stole something and is indeed a thief. The boy, Genet, reflects on his situation and sees no way out. He desires to steal; what he did was theft, so he is a thief. A voice in his head—his intuition—protests loudly, but he refuses to acknowledge it. The act itself and the facts of the incident silence this internal protest. As an adult, he recalls the moment he decided to steal something, an act undertaken without thought, conceived and executed in the hidden, secretive space where he often retreats. This decision has become an objective reality, and it is in this transition that the course of his life will be determined.

Genet has become a mythical metamorphosis of a child rejected by his mother(s) – a mother who, without forethought, created a demiurge that prevails in Genet’s action that in his action was without forethought, like the demiurge driven from the Pleroma into the lowest planes. It is then refracted onto Adam, driven from Paradise Lost, and Genet is exiled from his childhood, guilty and isolated, which Sartre emphasises as “I” for isolated, separate, in short, like the outsider. He had been miscategorised among those with ego dysfunction, principles of the souls, which they lack as they produce the slightest movement of the soul. His adoptive parents have given him the mark of guilt/Cain/beast – where once he lived in peace with himself, where desire was made simple and clear; in the adage “what is mine is yours”, Genet, not knowing the axiom, felt it intuitively. Their transparency seems deceptive; they were designed with a false bottom. Little Genet is a thief; eternity is thrust upon him; he is a thief from birth and onto death. No recourse is made to God in this eternity; as magical conception of the world, nature and freedom are the same. He is free because he is condemned. This label will follow him for the rest of his life.

This label has its origins in the Calvinist idea of predestination, which accords the sinner full responsibility for evil while denying him any possibility of doing Good. It is a fundamental perversion of freedom, a constant inclination to do wrong, a sort of reversal of grace, and a weighting of free will that makes it always descend to the lowest level.

You can see such examples when Elon, the anti-mystic neo-demagogue, emboldens his platform-X, a century-old racist pseudo-science spreading misinformation about racial minorities’ intelligence and physiology as biologically inferior to white people. The appearance of instrumental reason embodies false empiricism where they mimic Hackle’s fake charts, graphs and illustrations of biological evolution.

As we are not dumb Trump voters, correlation does not equal causation. Actual scientists have stated that the fundamental concept of race has no basis in biology. The evolutionary model of genetic diversity is completely different from this social model of distinct isolated racial groups. Racial differences are flawed views of genetic variation, which do not follow the kind of racial distinction. This racist pseudo-science places itself like a virus into intuitions like the DEI – where the motivation was a way to respond to woke ideals of race/sex nepotism. Such a case can be examined where Harris got a double hit of pseudo-race science but also was in her position because of that. Her resume for competence overextends her coalition or opposition by miles, but not enough to make her stand out; she is a mere clone of Biden or the Obama administration. There is a fine balance in the divisiveness. Although it may not be necessary – as it is not the outcome of rationality but an ideological approach towards reason, counterbalanced by other qualities, reason is saved from this weakness and is drawn towards its strength.

Furthermore, they may be hiding their own insecurities about their inferior idea about themselves and so overcompensate in fiction. Other factors like blood have equal importance and focus on DNA and its Codons, as well as melanin; these are the factors with which supernatural powers can resonate. The traits of fair skin [that lack melanin], blue eyes, and RH-negative blood are components that want to embed themselves into fiction, notably the Vril kind, to appear less inferior. These were some of the determining factors in concluding a superior race, and this component was used [at least on the surface] as a reason for a war with the world based on race.

Symbology is powerful because it’s part of magic, and Elon the Neo-Demagogue [the Algo – Algorithm, Demon Star resonator] decided [or MK U-Altered to do so] that he would give a Nazi salute two times in his inauguration speech. There is no mistake to be had; it was a Nazi salute [symbol] – he is found guilty, and his hand was in the cookie jar. He is guilty as Genet is perceived guilty, unlike Genet; however, he is a full adult with awareness and is known or perceived to be the richest man on earth. He can deny his accusers while denying his guilt and revealing the evil present all around them. Their extreme actions forced this evil to be consumed alongside the good. In a state of indifference and despair, he can challenge the principles of public morality, invoking either a Nietzschean philosophy or anarchist ethics. They denied the existence of universal values and opted instead to acknowledge only the survival of the fittest or the law of the jungle.

Genet is just a child, lacking the motivation and means to defend himself against accusations. To him, adults seem god-like, and their authority has tainted his morality to the point where it feels inherent to his being. In this situation, he finds himself both accused and judged. We witness a virtuous rage being employed as a means of reasoning, ultimately devising a future devoid of cohesion and hope, resulting in a pervasive hopelessness. This manipulation, used by Elon as a symbolic tool, seems designed to ritualise his power and maintain his untouchability. Genet is depicted as a monster, and his future is seemingly predetermined, such as imprisonment or a penal colony. Before being labelled a monster, Genet existed in a ‘sweet confusion,’ unaware of his identity. Now, as he becomes conscious of himself, he faces the harsh reality that he is viewed as a monster.

Genet has become an abused child, and the rape is through people’s gazes of guilt. It had penetrated him and transformed him forever into an object. The hand in the cookie jar is the crisis; the condemnation and guilt afterwards was the rape. Sartre says: “In our moral consciousness, a true rape can become unjust, yet inescapable condemnation; and, conversely, a condemnation can be experienced as rape. Both transform the guilty person, and he feels this objectification in his heart as a feeling of shame and in his sexual being as a subjection of coitus. From now on, Genet is deflowered; an iron grasp has made a woman of him; all that remains is for him to get used to being” [– Sartre]. After which, he would become a vestal of homosexuality.    

Genet is portrayed as a monster, while in truth; Monsters have made Genet what he is. Before he can determine his sexual determinancy, Genet reacted to his condemnation by a general ethical inversion. He was turned inside out, sent back to nothingness; it was nothingness alone he wished to belong, or the impossible. The undesired, he was not born of a man, but of some incubus. – Sartre

Elon has the power to initiate a fascist symbolic gesture [where, for some countries, it is illegal to do so, including Australia] because his position allows him to do so. Moreover, he is an inversion of Genet; power has made him free from morality, and the focus of guilt will slide off him like water on a duck’s back. He is the one doing the raping, and you cannot grow morality inside someone with narcissism, someone with an inflated and fragile ego. Elon’s grandparents are known sympathisers of the Nazi party in Germany, and his associations were known to be part of the Apartheid of South Africa.  

His act had made monsters of everyone and made all his sycophants “gay”, all those anti-woke  right-wing podcasters and mainstream media journalists who overtly claim that the gesture is merely “my heart goes towards you.” Not in gay in a traditional sense, but guilt by association, flying monkies of Elon’s guilt and shame, he had made them his bitches [his object] as they are without their integrity. As they are not afforded the same power, they will face the full force of the law and the same condemnation Genet got to anyone who feels that they can copy this abhorrent action.

.

.

.